Lecture 03: The Book of Genesis - Dr. Bill Barrick

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @skipsmominhouston
    @skipsmominhouston 4 роки тому +8

    Dr Bill is full of knowledge and wisdom. I admire that he is also a man of deep faith and his love for God’s holy word is evident.

  • @larryjones2901
    @larryjones2901 2 роки тому +4

    Great study of Genesis! Answers a lot of questions.
    The Truth is always in the details

  • @ewita7272
    @ewita7272 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you God for Your servants, teachers.

  • @goldenpeacock9598
    @goldenpeacock9598 3 роки тому +1

    Dr. Bill is a ardent faithful man in God Almighty and so his wisdom and knowledge . This kind of people is necessary for China nation. Dr. Bill Barrick Brother is a Russian national in birthright I think so
    Dr. Daniel Simon Keralam India

  • @SAOProductions1955
    @SAOProductions1955 2 роки тому +3

    "God has a plan "A" but no plan "B". " Brilliant!

  • @JerseyGurl4Life
    @JerseyGurl4Life 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm sorry, what is missing in day 5 in the first chapter of Genesis? I can't make out what he's saying.
    In the transcript, that word or phrase says "he came". I know that's not right.

  • @sallylauper8222
    @sallylauper8222 8 років тому +6

    Skip to 20:51 for a good schematic overview of Genesis Verse 1-7.

  • @RobbertVeen
    @RobbertVeen 7 років тому +1

    At 17:51 he does not remember right, the text in Num. 7:12 says hajom harishon, the first, and not jom echad as in Gen. 1:5.

  • @nativeflight7079
    @nativeflight7079 4 місяці тому

    I want to get a bible so I can start reading it. Which is the mos accurately translated?

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому

    please, repeat the question, for the video....

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому

    I dont understand this ones explanation of the grammatical tense used in Genesis....as I was taught future tense, vs past tense....the world became, or the world was....

  • @kvelez
    @kvelez 2 роки тому

    12:15
    Interesting.
    45:15
    How should a Christian handle Ancient Near Eastern Context interpretation?

  • @DanasWanderlustCrochet
    @DanasWanderlustCrochet 10 місяців тому

    Overview, chapter 1 7:30

  • @greglogan7706
    @greglogan7706 4 роки тому +1

    Doctor Bill,
    Thank you for being very honest about how you your epistomology related to The Bible.
    Thank you for openly/honestly acknowledging that you simply "accept it by faith"
    My question - what does that even mean?
    I not getting that it means anything more than a lively imagination - essentially a child-like, made up fairy tale...

    • @williamnathanael412
      @williamnathanael412 2 роки тому +1

      Allow me to attempt to answer your question. I parallelize 'by faith' with trusting other people's testimonies. We tend to (and ought to) trust the testimonies of others (in the absence of counterarguments/counterevidence), despite no purely rational arguments can be made on why we should trust statements made by other human beings. Thus, if it is okay to trust other people, why are we so hesitant about trusting our Creator?

    • @karenstork4717
      @karenstork4717 2 роки тому +1

      A little child is humble, trusting, quick to rejoice, quick to forgive, and simple. He knows his place, has little ambition or greed, and loves with his whole being. He does not let his intellect hide his heart or soul. A little child is humble, trusting, quick to rejoice, quick to forgive, and simple. Jesus Yeshua said “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3), and “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18:3). An Overactive Imagination ?? A Fairytale ?? That's Wonderful Dr. Barrick has that characteristic (like a child) and Will be going HOME to his Maker When It's his time.

  • @greglogan7706
    @greglogan7706 4 роки тому

    Dr. Bill,
    Unless I am really missing something big, you still have not addressed the foundational issue of manuscript evidence and the fact that the Hebrew manuscripts date from the 10th and 11th century.
    I understand that there are manuscripts in the dead sea scrolls - therefore, that would be a key element to work through so that we actually have a basis for all the words that were so minutely dissecting.

    • @jonasanf
      @jonasanf 4 роки тому +1

      Hi, do you know about hebraic? I need to help for interpret Genesis 1, i'm writing a ebook about Genesis 1 and the relation with Flat Earth, but of a critical perspective.

    • @greglogan7706
      @greglogan7706 11 місяців тому

      @@jonasanf
      No - but there are critical Hebrew scholars - I would reference two or three -
      Try Dr. Kipp Davis, Dr James Tabor - James actually re-translated the Hebrew text in the more literal fashion....very interesting.

    • @jonasanf
      @jonasanf 11 місяців тому

      oh, thanks bro, but i resigned of the subject a long time ago hahah@@greglogan7706

  • @RandallJackwak
    @RandallJackwak Рік тому

    It's pretty obvious why you have the error mentioned at the 15 minute mark: you include God creating the heavens and earth on day one, but really day one is God conceiving light out of the void. That's it. But that separation of light from the darkness of the void is also time.

    • @RandallJackwak
      @RandallJackwak Рік тому

      "the heavens and earth" in Genesis 1.1 speaks of the entirety of his creation. We then move to a recapitulation of what is prior to creation, i.e. "without form and void" to the completion of his project "the heavens and the earth"---conceiving light is day one, and time itself.

    • @IndyFied
      @IndyFied 3 місяці тому

      In the beginning GOD created the Heavens and the earth: then GOD explains that the earth was void and without form thus since darkness was on the face of the deep, He said let there be light. He separated the light from the darkness calling the light day and the darkness night. therefore that was 1 day. Day 1... personally I do not think any of us will ever understand Genesis 1 neither Hebrews or Revelation. Grace alone by faith. The same reason Jesus said whoever believes in Me shall inherit the Kingdom . That is Faith. Genesis is Faith. Hebrews is Faith, Revelation is Faith that Christ Jesus died on the Cross for our sins and was resurrected on the 3rd day and sits at the right hand of GOD the Father. And will come back to judge the living and the dead. That my friends is Scriptural Faith. Knowing and accepting the Living GOD. Receiving His Grace through our Faith in His eternal love and Divine order.

  • @wrestle4life234
    @wrestle4life234 4 роки тому

    The peeps at AnswersInGenesis might have something to say about taking Genesis 1 by faith. I know they got lots of good stuff on Genesis 6-11

  • @philipbuckley759
    @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому

    a belief system, based on statistics.....it is not only not probable, but not possible that life could have arisen, by chance....regardless of the time, involved, etc....

  • @MichaelGaribaldi
    @MichaelGaribaldi 5 років тому

    Good comment about God calling his creation good. It's a good contrast to the Sumna Alu (Sumerian myth of creation!)

  • @jerryfortenberry1956
    @jerryfortenberry1956 4 роки тому

    I don't know Hebrew. I wish I had this chart but with the Hebrew translated into English.

  • @dunoze
    @dunoze 5 років тому

    The Jews counting the day as starting in the evening began in the intertestamental period as before that time the day had began from dawn .

  • @mugglescakesniffer3943
    @mugglescakesniffer3943 Рік тому

    there is proof positive the Earth is more than 6000 years old that is not in dispute. Gap theory or no Gap theory. Usage of the verb was for what they knew and believed at the time without the benefit of science. Do you think the author that used that specific verb would have written it that way if they knew all we know about science right now?

  • @RandallJackwak
    @RandallJackwak Рік тому

    25:41 "There is no plan B." **WRONG** God changes his mind all the time. Look at Genesis 6.6. He comes to be sorry that he made man. But then he changes his plan again when he sees Noah.

  • @mugglescakesniffer3943
    @mugglescakesniffer3943 Рік тому

    Gap theory is not origin theory. it's about what happened between the start and now.

    • @philipbuckley759
      @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому

      is this not the same thing.....

    • @mugglescakesniffer3943
      @mugglescakesniffer3943 11 місяців тому

      no, origin theory is how the universe starts. Not what happens after it starts.@@philipbuckley759

  • @aquillafleetwood8180
    @aquillafleetwood8180 5 років тому +1

    Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
    Google, Night Signs, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
    Genesis 1: 14, the stars shall be for signs!
    Psalms 75: 6, says exaltation comes from God out of the north!

  • @greglogan7706
    @greglogan7706 4 роки тому

    I don't think that Dr Bill translated Hebrews 11.1 correctly ....and, as such, I'm uncertain he has an accurate understanding of the what faith actually is...🤔

    • @philipbuckley759
      @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому +1

      could you please elaborate...

    • @greglogan7706
      @greglogan7706 11 місяців тому

      @@philipbuckley759
      Thanks for your question!
      I would have to go back to the class to provide an accurate assessment - and if I have a chance , I will do so...

  • @mugglescakesniffer3943
    @mugglescakesniffer3943 Рік тому

    If God's creation is good then why did it become corrupt if he knows all? In a sense he was caught by surprise because he never just simply looked a head and created a creation to be perfect from beginning to end. Why the oopsie? That is not perfection.

    • @philipbuckley759
      @philipbuckley759 11 місяців тому

      when was Jesus crucified....according to the Bible...who was the one....slain, from the foundation, of the earth....in Rev 13.8

    • @mugglescakesniffer3943
      @mugglescakesniffer3943 11 місяців тому

      Nice apolyptic language you're now taking as literal.@@philipbuckley759

  • @prico3358
    @prico3358 2 роки тому

    Why are they all dressed formally?
    I didnt know this was a thing.. i didnt noticed this.. so .. for some reason i imagine class to be casual dress code.
    I mean.. you are learning... The most brilliant scientist minds do not dress up. Also if this is a biblical class.. you should not worry about the clothes you wear.. so why dress up code?