Contour Integral leads to Euler's Reflection Formula

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t 2 роки тому +3

    Great.
    I love complex analysis and ... Of course, I love this video too.
    Thank you so much.

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +2

      Glad you liked it!

    • @Jihad_Bankai
      @Jihad_Bankai Рік тому

      @@MathSolvingChannelCould you please tell me what the value of Phi of C2 and C4 paths are in number? And how do you get Phi of C2 and C4 path from? Or choose Phi between 0 to 2Pi?

  • @jbergamp
    @jbergamp 9 місяців тому

    Really good description of the solution. Thanks!

  • @richart4318
    @richart4318 2 роки тому +1

    this integral is tough, great video!

  • @RealLifeTop10s
    @RealLifeTop10s 2 роки тому +3

    Great Video!

  • @witness6347
    @witness6347 2 роки тому +1

    great video! this integral is very useful!

  • @sergiolucas38
    @sergiolucas38 Рік тому

    Great video, thanks :)

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 2 роки тому +1

    Noice!! Another way is sub z=e^x so you get integral e^(ax)/(1+e^x) from -inf to inf and solve with contour integration over the rectangle -inf to inf (real axis) and 0 to 2pi(Im axis).😀

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for sharing this :) This is the technique called "conformal mapping". Intuitively, exp-function and log-function they are mapping the region switching between rectangle and circle (or sector) 😉

    • @yoav613
      @yoav613 2 роки тому +1

      @@MathSolvingChannel good to know,i saw this in complex analysis book of princeton lectures.(great book btw)

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +1

      @@yoav613 Great! 😆

  • @slavinojunepri7648
    @slavinojunepri7648 Рік тому

    Excellent

  • @jarikosonen4079
    @jarikosonen4079 2 роки тому

    Looks very advanced math.
    Why keyhole is needed here? Test case?
    What is the result if its not complex analysis case?

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +1

      Result is independent of what method you choose, as long as you did it correctly.

  • @eamon_concannon
    @eamon_concannon 2 роки тому

    Why don't the integrals along paths C1 and C3 sum to 0? Intuitively, it seems that they should, although I understand your explanation.

  • @psp.643a
    @psp.643a Рік тому

    Hi
    Just like in C3 we took ze^(2pi*i), why dont we do the same (i.e. z -> ze^(pi*i) = -z)when calculating similar integral of sinx/x (in case of tunnel contour)

  • @צביקלברמן
    @צביקלברמן 9 місяців тому

    Why not plug in e^(2*pi*i)=1 at time=2.34 without carrying it further?

  • @xulq
    @xulq 2 роки тому +1

    can you do this for the same integrand but integrated from 0 to 1 instead?

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +2

      Yes, if the integral limit is from 0 to 1, then you can do the series expansion 1/(1+x)=sum (-1)^n*x^n, so the integral became sum (-1)^n* integral x^(a+n-1) dx from 0 to 1, this integral is simple, after integrate it you get sum (-1)^n/(n+a) where n is from 0 to infinity as the result 😉

    • @xulq
      @xulq 2 роки тому +1

      @@MathSolvingChannel thank you, i have another question:
      do you think you can find a closed form for sum[1/(a*n+1)^2] where a is just a real number but a =/= 0

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +2

      @@xulq It depends on what do you mean by "closed form". You can use digamma function to express it, only to "express" it. If you want a closed form such as some combinations of pi, e, etc, then answer is No.

    • @xulq
      @xulq 2 роки тому +1

      @@MathSolvingChannel aww okay thank you :v

    • @MathSolvingChannel
      @MathSolvingChannel  2 роки тому +2

      @@xulq You are welcome :) This is like the Gaussian integral (just an example for analogy), if the upper limit is not infinity, but some finite number, such as integral e^(-x^2) from 0 to 1, if we accept this expression as a "closed form", then it is just an expression. But we can't express it into the combination of those famous math constant.

  • @praxeria3680
    @praxeria3680 2 роки тому

    I think you should relefect how many videos you upload

  • @anonymousgawd..3047
    @anonymousgawd..3047 2 роки тому

    🐱🐱🐱🐱golchina