Missing the Point (Logical Fallacy)

An explanation of the Logical Fallacy known as Missing the Point or Ignoratio Elenchi in which an arguer makes the incorrect conclusion (Fallacy February & 90 Second Philosophy).
Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy and more!
Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy and more!

[@Nicoder6884]

I feel like this isn't so much of "missing the point" as it is "going overboard". "Missing the point" sounds more like whataboutism or just a completely off-topic argument. The examples here entail blowing the issue out of proportion, rather than targeting an incorrect/irrelevant issue.

[@robsim]

How does this compare to the naturalistic fallacy? All the examples in the video go from an IS to an OUGHT.

[@CarneadesOfCyrene]

Interesting point. This fallacy might overlap with the naturalistic fallacy, but it seems that it is just coincidence that all of my examples demonstrated that one as well. Good catch.

[@guillatra]

now I can learn all the english pronouncements of latin names.

[@TheRealisticNihilist]

This is henceforth named "the christianity fallacy."

[@JJPHILLYLG]

Ozy sent me.

[@CarneadesOfCyrene]

Good to hear it! I hope you enjoy.

[@nicoledelaguila2387]

Talking way too fast. Why? 🤷🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️