Topic 2.10 The Court in Action AP Government

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @chloes1308
    @chloes1308 4 роки тому +5

    I literally love your videos, thank you so much

  • @supersonic2778
    @supersonic2778 5 років тому +9

    Out of all the books behind you which one is your favorite?

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  5 років тому +9

      Really, really, really difficult to say. Very tough to compare fiction and nonfiction. But I'll say East of Eden by John Steinbeck

  • @mandavi2009
    @mandavi2009 4 роки тому +5

    It is very helpful as I am from India and also to study for act and TOEFL excellent and thank u so much

  • @Nz11918
    @Nz11918 4 роки тому +3

    I appreciate these videos soooo much thank you!!!!

  • @apeconomics7739
    @apeconomics7739 5 років тому +3

    This seems to be covering the content from topic 2.11 - Checks on the Judicial Branch...

  • @auroraseekins5714
    @auroraseekins5714 4 роки тому +2

    Can you explain appellate jurisdiction a little more to me? I don't quite understand the difference between appellate jurisdiction and original jurisdiction.

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  4 роки тому +7

      original = first court to hear a case. so this court rules on the facts of the case, often issues a verdict like guilty/not guilty if it's a criminal case.
      appellate = after the case has already been ruled on in a lower court, an appellate court hears APPEALS, which are NOT based on the facts of the case, but rather focus on legal/constitutional issues. Were your rights violated in some way? Was the trial fair? stuff like that

  • @leithdessureault4778
    @leithdessureault4778 4 роки тому +10

    I dont think that the pronuciation of words is really that importeant

  • @mandavi2009
    @mandavi2009 4 роки тому +1

    excellent
    thank y so much

  • @brettdobson3122
    @brettdobson3122 4 роки тому

    I still do not understand how Congress can change jurisdiction.

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  4 роки тому +1

      Hey, so I knew that it's in the Constitution but that didn't feel like that would be a very good answer lol. So I looked it up. Article 3, Section 2, 2nd paragraph. "the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as Congress shall make."

    • @brettdobson3122
      @brettdobson3122 4 роки тому

      @@CareyLaManna I suppose if the Democrats took both houses in the upcoming election, they could use this as a check on the power of the court. It seems like this check has rarely been used and has definitely not been abused.

    • @brettdobson3122
      @brettdobson3122 4 роки тому

      So they just can take jurisdiction away on an issue like abortion perhaps?

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  4 роки тому

      @@brettdobson3122 Yeah I don't have a ton of examples. It happened during the civil war, check out Ex Parte McCardle for a case where the Court ruled that Congress can strip it of jurisdiction. I believe those cases involved freedom of the press and habeas corpus. But yes, that would be an alternative to court stacking for Democrats to consider.

  • @wilnbroc
    @wilnbroc 5 років тому +1

    Mispronouncing certiorari.

    • @YS-tv4yv
      @YS-tv4yv 4 роки тому +23

      why did you come back 5 months later, on a second account, to again criticize his pronunciation?

  • @Wilnbrock
    @Wilnbrock 5 років тому +1

    Please check your pronunciations on latin words. writ of certiorari.