Defendable - something capable of being protected. Used when the capabilities are concrete and obvious Defensible - something capable of being protected. Used when the capabilities are not so concrete or obvious Both are adjectives and used interchangeably in modern language. Etymology still reveals a slight connotative distinction between the two.
They're completely synonymous. You offered two _explications_ (pace Carnap), but your comment contains no **_etymological_** traces whatsoever. Moreover, the offered explications rest on nothing. There is no reason, e.g., why the definitions could not be swapped. The prefixes ( _defend_ vs _defense_ ) give no indication of the distinction you're suggesting. Also, despite its popularity, the attempt to invoke etymology to resolve semantic questions is dubious, since the sense of a word is determined by its actual lexicographical usage not its origin.
That last game's attack was absurd. He must've made some massive opening mistakes to have been put in that position. Like that king side attack is way imbalanced. That must have been convertible somehow.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The thumbnail alone deserves a like
I clicked on the video just to like it because of the thumbnail and then I saw this comment lol. Agreed
😊😊😊
😊😊😊😊😊😊
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Aaaah nothing like settling into a few hours of Eric playing rapid. 👍🏻
You look so silly in the thumbnail, I love it!
❤
Dude that thumbnail is dope.
rapid format is the best
Defendable - something capable of being protected. Used when the capabilities are concrete and obvious
Defensible - something capable of being protected. Used when the capabilities are not so concrete or obvious
Both are adjectives and used interchangeably in modern language. Etymology still reveals a slight connotative distinction between the two.
that's really interesting actually, like the difference between 'i can defend' and 'i could put up a defense'
They're completely synonymous.
You offered two _explications_ (pace Carnap), but your comment contains no **_etymological_** traces whatsoever.
Moreover, the offered explications rest on nothing. There is no reason, e.g., why the definitions could not be swapped. The prefixes ( _defend_ vs _defense_ ) give no indication of the distinction you're suggesting.
Also, despite its popularity, the attempt to invoke etymology to resolve semantic questions is dubious, since the sense of a word is determined by its actual lexicographical usage not its origin.
@@mavaddat 🥱10m old comment idc
One dimensional would be just a list: a1, a2 (white pawn), ... h7, h8 (black rook)
So f4, queen f5, queen g3, knight g6.... it's not happening.
I loved it lmao
58:43 New chess board. Good grief. White chocolate vs. caramels.
Speaking of a great adventure... UA-cam would love some fresh Duck Chess content.😊
Second that
@@tvens1 Ignore tvens1. They do not speak for us. 🙃
Holy unintentional asmr
Just what I needed 🙏
Ecco spiegata la famosa legge di Morphy..ah no
I was expecting you to be in a scuba suit the entire video. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
Why did you expect scuba?
@@mikebaker2436 it looked like a scuba suit lol. I wrote this comment at 2 am. At first glance on the thumbnail I thought he was in a scuba suit.
@@Maywek Yeah, that dial by his neck is an altimeter not a pressure regulator. 😅🤗
if only there was one more pawn you could have had 100% of a cube
What an adventurous thumbnail… 😅
That last game's attack was absurd. He must've made some massive opening mistakes to have been put in that position. Like that king side attack is way imbalanced. That must have been convertible somehow.
Yeah gimmie that rapid chess bro
🎈 (art)
🎈
a single square would be 0-dimensional in that context. 1-dimension would be a line, so you could just put the 64 squares in a straight line hahaha
Peace Ice Tea is the best :)
too slower games for ze liking
I known no one wants to be that guy but the guy in the 2nd game was obviously cheating