What Is A Tourbillon Watch And Why Is It So Expensive?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • Shop Watches: teddybaldassar...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 155

  • @stuffhappens5681
    @stuffhappens5681 7 місяців тому +305

    Tourbillon seemed like a good idea at the time but turned out to be only useful as a decoration as the caged rotating escapement never made the movement function more accurately than a conventional bridged balance wheel. That’s why it never caught on as anything beyond a novelty. But it looks cool.

    • @emu314159
      @emu314159 3 місяці тому +20

      Also, it was made for pocket watches, that while they might rotate, are in one plane. What it corrects for is unnecessary when you swing in all planes with a wristwatch.

    • @stevelussing7750
      @stevelussing7750 23 дні тому +3

      @@stuffhappens5681 the Tourbillon was conceived to compensate for the effect of gravity on the delicate hair spring in an always vertical pocket watch. That seriously compromised the accuracy of the watch. They are not a necessary complication on a wristwatch.

  • @lakey7886
    @lakey7886 Рік тому +466

    Hands on
    Seagull hold my beer

    • @Marshell99
      @Marshell99 Рік тому +1

      Tourbillion on a Seagull?

    • @ShonWick_75
      @ShonWick_75 Рік тому

      Seagull has a $800 onei just saw on chrono

    • @lakey7886
      @lakey7886 Рік тому +55

      @@Marshell99 yes seagull makes a tourbillon movement

    • @ketaminekp
      @ketaminekp Рік тому +2

      Who's going to repair it? Or service it?

    • @Dazulolwarrior
      @Dazulolwarrior Рік тому +38

      ​@@ketaminekpno one, they're just gonna replace it another cheaply made tourbillion if you send it back

  • @MrAndy76101
    @MrAndy76101 Рік тому +166

    Always wondered the explanation, thanks for putting it in a short 😊

    • @MrBradclack
      @MrBradclack 3 місяці тому +1

      Pretty sure Tourbillion has been debunked

    • @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm
      @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm Місяць тому +1

      Yes, but it doesn’t do what it’s supposed to… Little or no improvement for accuracy

    • @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm
      @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm Місяць тому +1

      @@MrBradclack doesn’t do anything… Little or no improvement accuracy… You are correct

  • @stevelussing7750
    @stevelussing7750 3 місяці тому +73

    You can buy a Chinese made quality Tourbillion watch for $899. A made in Switzerland Tourbillon movement starts at about $10,000.

    • @Dude12991
      @Dude12991 25 днів тому +2

      There is one an Amazon for $42! I bought it and it feels cheap but was worth $42!

    • @Gearhead221
      @Gearhead221 25 днів тому +10

      ​@@Dude12991Probably just an exposed balance wheel and not a true tourbillon.

    • @michaelh8854
      @michaelh8854 4 дні тому

      And the one made in Switzerland is still likely made in china

    • @Gearhead221
      @Gearhead221 4 дні тому

      @@michaelh8854 Source: "dude, trust me"

    • @Gearhead221
      @Gearhead221 6 годин тому

      @@michaelh8854 Source: "dude, trust me"

  • @nickhayes4169
    @nickhayes4169 9 місяців тому +25

    I've acquired an Agelocer tourbillon, it's such a beautiful thing, I'd never thought I'd own one.

    • @avarmauk
      @avarmauk 5 місяців тому +2

      I was a bit skeptical of Agelocer tourbillon, it’s so cheap, I wonder how they can make it for so cheap. How is it as a watch overall?

    • @nickhayes4169
      @nickhayes4169 5 місяців тому +3

      @avarmauk is absolutely brilliant, I'd recommend one.

    • @Crimson_V0
      @Crimson_V0 2 місяці тому

      It's still working?

    • @nickhayes4169
      @nickhayes4169 2 місяці тому

      @Crimson_V12 yes, it's an amazing watch.

  • @popomomo12
    @popomomo12 Рік тому +143

    And yet Breguet get overlooked as a brand my many

    • @songoku-jx3cb
      @songoku-jx3cb Рік тому +36

      Having a good product is not enough . You have to market the product the right way to the right people which breguet does poorly .

    • @popomomo12
      @popomomo12 Рік тому +7

      @@songoku-jx3cb I agree, that is very important.

    • @miggygetright6344
      @miggygetright6344 Рік тому +7

      Breguet are stuck in the past, their watches are amazing but they’re not catering to the new consumers at all.

    • @sairoof4704
      @sairoof4704 7 місяців тому +5

      ​@miggygetright6344 they don't have to. As long as they still make actually cool stuff

    • @redhunnid5142
      @redhunnid5142 6 місяців тому +1

      ⁠​⁠​⁠@@miggygetright6344So Breguet is like Rolls Royce they can careless what other car manufacturers are doing they will keep making the same product for their target audience and with great quality because their product speaks for itself people that know watches know they’re good quality watches just like people who know cars know Rolls Royce makes good quality vehicles the audience that wants to buy either brand knows who they are they don’t need to market like these other brands because they are established

  • @octagon_009
    @octagon_009 9 місяців тому +34

    Aliexpress: Hold my beer 😂

    • @Bloodroot5
      @Bloodroot5 9 місяців тому +3

      I got mine for 40 bucks

  • @dimasakbar7668
    @dimasakbar7668 Рік тому +9

    So when i was not interested in watches, i have an automatic (gifted to me) with open heart of which i proclaim a tourbillon. No one correct me on that though.
    The embarassment i feel when i realized i was wrong years down the line when i finally start to care about watches 😂

  • @tonyjong1138
    @tonyjong1138 Місяць тому

    Amazing close-up shoot!

  • @uncommonsense910
    @uncommonsense910 Рік тому +7

    There are some affordable versions like Stuhrling and Waldhoff, give us a list Teddy!

    • @chris555
      @chris555 Рік тому

      What do you class as affordable? Sub 10k or not?

  • @mocha_GTAG
    @mocha_GTAG 32 хвилини тому

    I feel like being able to see the movement of ur watch is essential

  • @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm
    @JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm Місяць тому +6

    A Turbion just doesn’t interest me in the least. New Year’s Eve celebration says they are prepared. It’s adding complication for the sake of complication and they don’t do what they were designed to do… little or no improvement to accuracy, but it does triple your service cost

    • @1guitarlover
      @1guitarlover 28 днів тому

      Just for people with much money to enjoy.😂

  • @mr.niceguy2524
    @mr.niceguy2524 18 днів тому +1

    $100.000... until China came to Ruin it all 😂

  • @ericgrace9995
    @ericgrace9995 3 місяці тому

    Thanks !

  • @FreeSpeechWarrior
    @FreeSpeechWarrior 14 днів тому

    Teddy that is a beautiful watch what's the name of that one?

  • @TheEagles427
    @TheEagles427 Рік тому

    Outstanding presentation

  • @ДиванныйЭксперт-ч9ш
    @ДиванныйЭксперт-ч9ш 5 місяців тому +1

    Я купил у китайцев на Ali часы Aesop 7056 за 300$ При чём турбийон у него парящий, а не традиционный. Смотрится красиво. Качество шикарное! Я доволен.

  • @Foxeconomy
    @Foxeconomy 3 місяці тому

    Beautiful

  • @rching7700
    @rching7700 4 місяці тому +2

    People be like : Tourbillion is so complicated, so much parts, prestigious movement, that's why it's expensive.
    Then came Seagull and other brands selling it for wayyyyy cheaper.
    You know you are being ripped off. It's all about marketing, and branding.

    • @johnbrylledomingo6377
      @johnbrylledomingo6377 9 днів тому

      when a Quartz is more accurate, more durable, easier repaired than a Tourbillion ...

  • @brettkeeler8822
    @brettkeeler8822 10 місяців тому +3

    And we’re not going to mention that cool little deadbeat sub dial in the middle there?? What is that cool little thing??

  • @Omgirang
    @Omgirang Рік тому

    FP Journe is a dream watch for sure. Soon.

  • @orthoh2224
    @orthoh2224 7 місяців тому +3

    Are there different names for tourbillon in one plan like this one and tourbillon spinning in the 3 dimensions?

  • @javier5606
    @javier5606 4 місяці тому +1

    Seagull meanwhile selling tourbillion watches for 100€, seems the hands on approach can be quite cheap when it's a child's.

  • @dennisengland7521
    @dennisengland7521 День тому

    I gotta say that MOST of my watch collection is Tribillion 😅 BECAUSE I personally like this type of watch. Just for your information

  • @Darkest_Soul_187
    @Darkest_Soul_187 Місяць тому

    100k is insane

  • @TomRauhe
    @TomRauhe 6 місяців тому +2

    Teddy. Please. The Tourbillion is a scam since at least 50 years. It's super easy to make, and watch makers have been charging way too much for way too much time. You can get a double Tourbillion watch for under 1000€.

  • @Gearhead221
    @Gearhead221 25 днів тому

    Fun fact: a mechanical chronograph is more complex than a tourbillon.

  • @Paul-nr6ws
    @Paul-nr6ws 4 місяці тому +1

    You forgot to say that they are a complete waste of time on a wrist watch

  • @osoiderman
    @osoiderman 5 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤❤❤ those machanics!!!

  • @taotzu1339
    @taotzu1339 16 днів тому

    I always thought a tourbillion was some kind of French food spice.

  • @EanPaul200
    @EanPaul200 4 місяці тому +1

    A real question. If its so expensive to make why can you buy cheap versions like stuhrling for $200?

  • @himeshpanda8803
    @himeshpanda8803 27 днів тому

    The damage on that Tissot 😢

    • @MercuryBPW
      @MercuryBPW 18 днів тому

      What damage? Those micro scratches on the back? Have you ever actually used a wrist watch for it's intended purpose?

  • @shahlegno5890
    @shahlegno5890 Рік тому

    Good mechanical decoration

  • @dannysimenauer5745
    @dannysimenauer5745 Рік тому +26

    The tourbillon is totally unnecessary in a modern watch.

    • @graemeyetts3465
      @graemeyetts3465 Рік тому +2

      I think I agree, evidenced by the flood of cheap Chinese Tourbillon s available, typically on TV shopping channels

    • @avarmauk
      @avarmauk Рік тому +9

      It’s a flex and looks cool. But serves no real function beyond that. To be fair any mechanical watch is pretty unnecessary in the modern world.

    • @ChrisStoneinator
      @ChrisStoneinator 10 місяців тому +15

      A mechanical movement is totally unnecessary in a modern watch. It’s a craft, let people make cool things and then buy them or don’t.

    • @TheGrenadier97
      @TheGrenadier97 10 місяців тому +1

      Lots of things are, but weren't buying these things for pure and absolute usefulness, are we?

    • @Katsgezellig
      @Katsgezellig 6 місяців тому +4

      Watches as a whole are completely unnecessary. That's why the tourbillon is even more necessary 😜 as decoration

  • @bobsimpson9228
    @bobsimpson9228 Рік тому

    Which watch is that?

    • @DeRobez
      @DeRobez Рік тому +1

      F.P. Journe Souveraine

  • @jacobliddiard158
    @jacobliddiard158 5 місяців тому

    What is the name of the tourbillon principle that looks more like a sphere than a disc?

    • @pyb.5672
      @pyb.5672 5 місяців тому +2

      gyro-tourbillon or 3 axis tourbillon

  • @Frederik-c9l
    @Frederik-c9l Рік тому +13

    What do you think about the 1000 dollar Chinese tourbillon?

    • @RabbitWatchShop
      @RabbitWatchShop Рік тому +12

      They’re decent, but the problem with them is finding a watchmaker to repair or service them. It’s expensive to service. And the parts are difficult to get.

    • @watchguy1244
      @watchguy1244 Рік тому +4

      Now under 400 dolar

    • @Uncle_Dave_Dave
      @Uncle_Dave_Dave Рік тому +8

      they are fantastic looking, but i'd rather get a cheap skeleton from a shithouse company

    • @sjb3460
      @sjb3460 9 місяців тому

      crap

  • @CaosBoyCathian
    @CaosBoyCathian Рік тому +6

    Sugess be like: 199 for Tourbillion Master.

  • @Katsgezellig
    @Katsgezellig 6 місяців тому

    & i bought one from aesop for 160 bucks 😁

  • @andrewjackson8089
    @andrewjackson8089 Рік тому

    $100,000….worth every penny 😂

  • @bertholdbach4959
    @bertholdbach4959 Рік тому +1

    Cant be that hard to make, if even the chinese can pump them out.

    • @vyrsh0
      @vyrsh0 Рік тому

      Chinese are good at complexity but not quality. Atleast I think so. They do make a lot of machines which are complex, but I've never seen good quality.

    • @daltonparker7792
      @daltonparker7792 Рік тому +1

      @@vyrsh0the point though is that it can still be done. So if it’s going to be good quality, maybe $5k at the most. What justifies $999,800 price increase?

    • @vyrsh0
      @vyrsh0 Рік тому

      @@daltonparker7792 maybe they don't have that kind of engineers or lack some kind machines, but Chinese are never able to produce quality stuff for some reason. and I have specifically seen it in mechanical stuff not civil or electrical. how much money you put in is hardly going to make a difference.

    • @daltonparker7792
      @daltonparker7792 Рік тому +1

      @@vyrsh0 the Chinese actually make some of the finest time pieces in the world, along side japan. It’s the price point you look at though. The grand seiko for example, is the most precise mechanical time piece in existence (aside from super computers that cost$$$), it’s hand polished beyond the standards of any other watch maker in the world, and it still remains elegant and simple. The grand seiko is a marvel of engineering, and is made by 3 guys I believe, from the drawing board, all the way to the customer. And yet, those watches cost $10k brand new. It’s a level of precision that is unmatched. But these watches are going for $100k, simply for a gimmick. :/

    • @vyrsh0
      @vyrsh0 Рік тому

      @@daltonparker7792 yes, completely forgot about that.

  • @DrJanLindberg
    @DrJanLindberg 3 місяці тому

    A tourbillon is useless on a modern watch. It only makes a watch more expensive and more vulnerable, but not increasing the accuracy.

  • @ShaheedPeters
    @ShaheedPeters 3 місяці тому

    Beautifully engineered…but far too complicated to do much more with than admire

  • @CCPwillfall01
    @CCPwillfall01 29 днів тому

    #1. China makes these for 400 bucks mass produced and are made reliably
    #2.the tourbillon was mass produced back in the early 1800s without modern tech
    There is zero reason for these to be so expensive

  • @Khrann
    @Khrann 3 місяці тому

    100k of witch 5k of watch and 95k “because it’s a tourbillion and I’m a Swiss watchmaker”

  • @mynamea.n.s.s5472
    @mynamea.n.s.s5472 8 місяців тому

    Love it

  • @Myrslokstok
    @Myrslokstok 6 місяців тому

    Zero power still works!

  • @Jai17737
    @Jai17737 5 місяців тому

    Understood nothing but like the watch

  • @optionswizard
    @optionswizard 5 місяців тому

    Swiss Watch industry has to be the biggest scam. I mean like we can build sophisticated semiconductors for few hundred dollars but a watch costs thousands of dollars😂

    • @slreefer7353
      @slreefer7353 4 місяці тому

      Probably the economies of scale. Everyone wears thousands of semiconductors but not many wear watches and then go on to automatic watches.
      And then the history, prestige, quality and finish

  • @headshot6959
    @headshot6959 2 місяці тому

    Uh, no.. you can get a tourbillon for much less than £100k. Did you mean 10k?

  • @Papapokerfaze
    @Papapokerfaze 2 місяці тому

    Did a tourbulon cost that much back then lol or even relative

  • @FesJenkins
    @FesJenkins 7 місяців тому

    What is that purple glass for?

    • @eduardszucs6302
      @eduardszucs6302 7 місяців тому +1

      Those are synthetic rubies. Often called jewels. Since they are the second hardest material before diamonds, they almost never wear out, so in watches they are mainly used as bearings in a watch movement to reduce the friction between a watch's mechanical components protecting them from getting worn out.

  • @submariner144
    @submariner144 7 місяців тому +1

    Now ask this to the chinese: "why it is so cheap?" 😂

  • @randyvfromtheperch
    @randyvfromtheperch Рік тому

    UM, NO - MOST SWISS TOURBILLIONS ARE MAYBE AN ADDITIONAL $10K - NOT $100K
    .

  • @abdul-vq1zr
    @abdul-vq1zr 8 днів тому

    All cost production 1000 dollar .
    Selling $ 100.000.000 .😅😅😅

  • @SRADracer
    @SRADracer 3 місяці тому

    China can build a real one for about 1000 euro, so it is not expensive. Only marketing makes it expensive.

  • @Romanellochw
    @Romanellochw 3 місяці тому

    100k? I can get 100 of em on Temu for 50 bucks 😂

  • @pamelah6431
    @pamelah6431 10 місяців тому

    Putting the billion in tourbillion.

  • @SupremeSkeptic
    @SupremeSkeptic 3 місяці тому

    "Why is tourbillon so expensive?"
    Because it is not made in China...

  • @sgg3745
    @sgg3745 20 днів тому

    Tour.... rhymes with pour.

  • @massivegas9125
    @massivegas9125 25 днів тому

    Wrooong suges didit for 500$

  • @ILLMATIC2222
    @ILLMATIC2222 4 місяці тому

    Review the Trump version

  • @panther105
    @panther105 5 місяців тому

    And yet, cheap ones are being made by the millions in THAT country

  • @zuulroom
    @zuulroom 6 місяців тому

    “Terrbeeyaan” Eh?

  • @nasdoc1
    @nasdoc1 3 місяці тому

    Why make something simple so complicated. That's a waste of resource and money.
    When you have a lot of money and you don't know what to do with it, you just start wasting it.

  • @thegamingbegginers5777
    @thegamingbegginers5777 Рік тому +3

    Chinese: what the hell is this guy talking about.
    Here goes 200 pounds tourbillon
    Here goes 300 pounds tourbillon

  • @cryptowhale1615
    @cryptowhale1615 3 місяці тому

    I can get one from temu for $10

  • @harry-eto
    @harry-eto Рік тому +9

    Aand it's completely useless in a wristwatch. Nice to observe though.

  • @0xyousaf
    @0xyousaf 3 місяці тому

    Theoratically??
    Seriously??

  • @twiki1963
    @twiki1963 9 місяців тому

    F. P. Journe

  • @verocimil
    @verocimil 4 місяці тому

    Why are than chinese tourbillon-watches so cheap?

  • @craigborrenpohl1233
    @craigborrenpohl1233 3 місяці тому

    So you’re the reason he’s trying to charge $100,000.

  • @karimkj01
    @karimkj01 26 днів тому

    Nice but I don't care really

  • @Davviid2007
    @Davviid2007 4 місяці тому

    Anyone else here because of the Trump watch?

  • @markscott9777
    @markscott9777 4 місяці тому

    It's a gimmick for fools😂

  • @professorkiki7280
    @professorkiki7280 22 дні тому

    I'm autisticks

  • @benzonex
    @benzonex Рік тому +4

    Strange. Your confused and gibbery explanation still leaves me wanting to know what exactly a 'tourbillion' is.
    I'll ask Chat gtp instead...

    • @J.Millhouse
      @J.Millhouse Рік тому +3

      Wdym? He explained it about as well as you can in a short. It’s a mechanism that rotates the spring that causes the watch to “beat”, that way gravity gets more evenly applied to said spring as you wear it throughout the day. Explain it much further and the video becomes a physics lesson.