"When he said you can never take this moment away from me, that's like the last line he says before you find the Cathedral he's isolate in and kill him for his soulstone. This is the moment keeping him alive in Dark Souls 4."
All right, that does it...I am going to resort to watching Cushvlog episodes from a year ago...I must get my Matt Christman stream of consciousness fix. I keep thinking, who are these people interfering with Matt Christman. I am experiencing really bad Cushvlog withdrawal...such a cruel bearded man to cut us off so abruptly...I really miss the journeys of the mind you used to take us on Matt. Even if I didn't always agree, I knew I could leave my reality for a solid hour or more... UA-cam became a more desolate place without your Cushvlog show Matt. Please finish your book soon so you can restart Cushvlog. Thank you for helping me endure the Pandemic Matt!
happy about all the movie episodes but seriously thankful for the ones about the dogshit films because from what i'm hearing i couldn't mentally endure watching these myself lol
If only there was a way to clip into this movie Ken Langone crying on CNBC because people were talking about raising taxes during the Democratic primary.
I was looking for a clip of John Smock, the Chilean Constitutional Convention secretary and this was at the top of my misspelled query's search results and for a second was very confused about why CTH did an episode about him.
@@mrsoshadabaadman well, i think that this is evidence that nobody else is interested, which is fair enough. i’d settle for a Dershowitz-hate fest update, as much than i dislike the Ronan Farrow-mania.
What’s up with all the ads? I mean, I’m happy to see y’all getting paid but damn. I’ve already had 3 or 4, and there’s still 14 yellow lines coming up :/
@@erikcribley5271 isn't it more reasonable for everyone for them to put in a few ads so they still get paid and not 25 so we have to entirely avoid supporting them..?
My cheapo solution is to just drag the cursor just ahead of each ad, watch it vanish and then reset to the begining. I try and watch a couple to support them though.
@@Some_Average_Joe that's a damn shame, you'd hope they looked at that. The information they are trying to portray is in direct contradiction to me consuming that amount of advertising.
@@berdyderg900 I'm pretty sure the guy is joking about how Biden being an awful centrist is enabling Chapo to be more bitter and sardonic, which is what makes them entertaining to begin with. Of course, I doubt western lefty sarcasm gives the people suffering under US imperialism much comfort either.
@@Cote-de-Boeuf if you idea of a joke happens to unironically be the consensus ideology in your half if the world, don't be surprised if it confuses someone
But you guys are wrong as fuck about Hawk Newsome. That guy works round the clock for his cause; even good people can get caught in crapola these days.
The relationship between educational attainment and genes is complicated, and we are still at the beginning of trying to disentangling this. The fact that genes play a role in educational outcomes has been established decades ago with twin studies, whereby identical twins, who share 100% of their DNA, were compared to fraternal twins, who share as much DNA as a normal pair of siblings. Like all behavioral traits that were studied in twins, identical twins were more likely to have similar educational levels than fraternal twins, which is a strong indication that the trait is heritable. The heritability of educational attainment has been estimated to be ~40%. More recently, geneticists have been able to pin-point specific locations in the genome that are responsible for these heritability estimates. The effects of individual genetic variants are very small, so very large sample sizes are required to reach sufficient statistical power to identify these tiny effects. In 2013, the first three variants were detected in a study where DNA was measured for 126,000 individuals. Larger studies followed soon thereafter, with the most recent study from 2018 consisting of 1.1 million individuals, which identified 1,271 genetic variants to be significantly associated with school performance. This number will certainly increase as these studies grow. In this latest study, all these small effects in aggregate explain about 10% of the individual differences in educational attainment. Geneticists are now able to show, using molecular DNA measures, that the association between your genes and educational attainment can in part be explained by these indirect genetic effects that travel from your parents trough your rearing environment. This means that these genetic effects are about half as predictive of school outcomes in adopted children than in children that grew up with their biological parents. A similar effect is visible on a regional level as well. A recent study of 450,000 people from all over Great Britain showed that people with similar genetic propensities for educational attainment cluster together geographically, and that the geographic patterns of these genes strongly resemble regional differences in socio-economic status. The environmental living circumstances also differ greatly between these regions, resulting in regional differences in physical and mental health problems, which in turn has its impact on regional differences in educational attainment as well. Part of the associations between genes and educational attainment are due to these regional differences in environmental living circumstances, making these genes less predictive for educational attainment within regions than across the country. Genomics is just starting to disentangle what these associations between our genes and school performance mean, and the field still have a long way to go. There are a number of directions in which this research will continue. Firstly, geneticists will continue to increase the sample sizes, so they can produce better estimates of the genetic effects and identify more associated genetic variants. These larger studies will have to be conducted within families and within regions as well in order to control for the environmental influences that artificially inflate the estimated genetic effects, while also learning more about the indirect genetic effects of the genes carried by the people around us. Secondly, they will have to tease out through which lower-level traits these genetic variants express themselves. Genes do not directly influence educational attainment, instead they influence biological processes that are associated with a wide range of lower level outcomes that together have an influence on your school performance. These lower-level outcomes include things like intelligence and personality, but also outcomes related to physical and mental health. Finally, once they have teased out through which traits the genetic effects travel, it will perhaps become more feasible to start learning more about all the layers of complex biological processes in between these traits and our DNA sequence. Genetics could help raise awareness about the difficulty that substantial parts of the population have with climbing the socio-economic ladder in an increasingly complex society. Policy makers often overlook the role of genetics in the rapidly growing social inequalities. When we disregard genetics, we end up in a society where everyone is expected to have the capability to perform well in school and on the job market, and whoever does not is likely to be regarded as not having worked hard enough. Accepting that both genetics and environmental influences have a role in people’s failures and achievements might bring us a little bit closer to building a more fair society.
As long as health care is private and for profit that kind of system will flatter and ossify the existing stratification in society. Even the most well-intentioned genetic scheme, when governed under logic of money and profit, becomes social darwinism and eugenics. God's design of evolution leaves some things to chance, and other things to individual choice - who are we to 'fix' every aspect of His selective design. Our reductionism is demonstrably harming the ecology of this planet which has been leased to us. No machine ever made by man can compare to the dynamic complexity of God's work. Not to say people should eschew science and medicine, but they have a right to question any system that is imposed by other humans and is unreasonably 'one size fits all'.
@@MilesBont they are making a rather banal argument that genetics influence academic success and we should redesign the education system to reflect this. But anyone can make the Pascal's Wager that they are more than the checksum of their 23&Me.txt. How is academic success measured? It is well known that the education system has a problem with implicit and explicit bias.
There are facts that were once known, sometimes generally known, that are now known to but a few. Some of this information loss is caused by changes in occupational patterns - farmers automatically know something about heritability, clerks and workers in dark satanic mills, and Chapo viewers, not so much. But mostly these facts are unpleasant, at least to some ears. People who mention such facts are punished - generally in terms of their careers, not being invited to parties, etc. That’s enough to cause a 10 or 20-fold drop in visibility, which ought to tell you something about how brave people are. Many people assume that everyone is secretly aware of those unpleasant facts, but that is not the case. A generation that has grown up never hearing those facts will be almost entirely unaware of them, in part because their personal life experiences don’t impinge on those patterns much. This means that they can and sometimes do make serious mistakes that those ‘secretly aware’ types never would. There are a lot of facts like this. It’s made even worse by charlatans spewing falsehoods - sometimes that’s all that the typical undergraduate is exposed to. For example, average brain size is not the same in all human populations. Average cranial capacity in Europeans is about 1362 ccs; 1380 in Asians, 1276 in Africans. It’s about 1270 in New Guinea. Generally there is a trend with latitude - brain volume is lowest near the equator. And no, despite Gould’s bushwa, there is nothing especially difficult about measuring brain volume. Direct measurement of a healthy brain is best; but that is now done, using magnetic resonance imagery, and the results are about the same - a mean black-white difference of about 1 standard deviation. Graduate students in anthropology generally don’t know those facts about average brain volume in different populations. Some of those students stumbled onto claims about such differences and emailed a physical anthropologist I know, asking if those differences really exist. He tells them ‘yep’ - I’m not sure what happens next. Most likely they keep their mouths shut. Ain’t it great, living in a free country?
1) Scientific American posted a story about brain size having a slight correlation to intelligence in 2016, so no, this information is not so taboo that you’ll be blackballed for discussing it 2) what will get you blackballed is what you say next. If you try to justify violence against anyone because of something as unreliable as brain size, you’re a scumbag. Intelligence is neither an excuse nor a justification for subjugation or oppression. This is even more unreliable when you try to equate brain size to skin color. At the end of the day, there’s nothing you can do with this information. It’s not substantial or reliable enough to use in any capacity and the things you’d try to use it for can still be opposed on moral or ethical grounds. 3) holy shit, I can’t believe I’m responding to a skull size person.
We're still talking about craniology? Do you fuckers actively try to be wrong? What are you going to do about unreliable different cranium sizes in some populations?
‘It used to be you get a democrat and a republican, and everyone’s happy, and then Patrice LaMumba’s pinky falls out of his pocket…’ 🤣
I felt that. Praying for the DRC to awaken as a true global force.
the comment about the "shithead social studies teacher" with the cow metaphor is insanely accurate. felix cannot miss. (Mr. Argo, however, did.)
these film reviews don't fucking miss.
I'm just waiting for the mother of all Chapo reviews - the Snyder cut
"When he said you can never take this moment away from me, that's like the last line he says before you find the Cathedral he's isolate in and kill him for his soulstone. This is the moment keeping him alive in Dark Souls 4."
All right, that does it...I am going to resort to watching Cushvlog episodes from a year ago...I must get my Matt Christman stream of consciousness fix. I keep thinking, who are these people interfering with Matt Christman. I am experiencing really bad Cushvlog withdrawal...such a cruel bearded man to cut us off so abruptly...I really miss the journeys of the mind you used to take us on Matt. Even if I didn't always agree, I knew I could leave my reality for a solid hour or more... UA-cam became a more desolate place without your Cushvlog show Matt. Please finish your book soon so you can restart Cushvlog. Thank you for helping me endure the Pandemic Matt!
I feel like he's pretty much said everything that needs to be said and is just repeating himself now
I miss it too!
18:40 oh my god my batshit 11th grade government and economics teacher did this exact thing lmao
24:25 Whenever Felix starts saying “so-and-so looks like...” without fail my shit falls apart FAST❤️
happy about all the movie episodes but seriously thankful for the ones about the dogshit films because from what i'm hearing i couldn't mentally endure watching these myself lol
Its not like anyone's rushing to get a STARZ subscription for this.
One of your best episodes to date. Bleak, but so on point and sincere.
If only there was a way to clip into this movie Ken Langone crying on CNBC because people were talking about raising taxes during the Democratic primary.
Or the secretary of defense crying because of women in Afghanistan suffering after US pulled troops out.
@@farmingganja5277 But still funding the Taliban.
@@mrsoshadabaadman It's good work if you can get it.
“Susan Collins; now that’s a woman who’s aisle I’d like to cross”
I was looking for a clip of John Smock, the Chilean Constitutional Convention secretary and this was at the top of my misspelled query's search results and for a second was very confused about why CTH did an episode about him.
i wish that they would take apart that inane Allen v Farrow ‘documentary’…i have my own little list of what i’ve undergone, i suppose.
You need to mobilize like the Snyder Cut Community.
@@mrsoshadabaadman well, i think that this is evidence that nobody else is interested, which is fair enough. i’d settle for a Dershowitz-hate fest update, as much than i dislike the Ronan Farrow-mania.
Daily Wire ad on this 😂😂😂
The review Felix read almost killed me
What’s up with all the ads? I mean, I’m happy to see y’all getting paid but damn. I’ve already had 3 or 4, and there’s still 14 yellow lines coming up :/
Use an adblocker
@@erikcribley5271 isn't it more reasonable for everyone for them to put in a few ads so they still get paid and not 25 so we have to entirely avoid supporting them..?
Honestly I needed the breaks this time
My cheapo solution is to just drag the cursor just ahead of each ad, watch it vanish and then reset to the begining.
I try and watch a couple to support them though.
adblockers are free!
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADBLOCKER
I'm sure this point has been made before, why do they think it's realistic to place ads every 4 minutes?
I think UA-cam does that automatically and they are just too lazy to change it
@@Some_Average_Joe that's a damn shame, you'd hope they looked at that. The information they are trying to portray is in direct contradiction to me consuming that amount of advertising.
@@tomreynolds3119 just use an adblock
What the fuck are these ads?
More commercials please
Jesus the amount of adds y'all are shoving in is getting less and less aberrant...
Why does will keep saying canard? What do ducks have to do with this?
Wtf there’s so many ads in this one
Ad every 4 mins... looks suspiciously like rent seeking to me.
"wretched ham oaf"
OMG, sound quality is incredible! The humor...mwah! You know, I'm actually *glad* Biden won now.
The kids trying to survive in Syria aren't as pleased but I'm glad you can enjoy your brunch
@@berdyderg900 The kids dying in Yemen while Biden makes up his mind also apparently feel a slight discomfort.
@@berdyderg900 I'm pretty sure the guy is joking about how Biden being an awful centrist is enabling Chapo to be more bitter and sardonic, which is what makes them entertaining to begin with. Of course, I doubt western lefty sarcasm gives the people suffering under US imperialism much comfort either.
@@Cote-de-Boeuf if you idea of a joke happens to unironically be the consensus ideology in your half if the world, don't be surprised if it confuses someone
felix talks a lot about opiates
felix talks alot about dark souls too
Opiates are the dark souls of the masses.
It’s also like The Snowman (“I gave you all the clues”) because it’s an awful movie
Good job 👍
Relax with these ads, my goodness
*laughs in uBlock Origin*
I thought the home depot guy was anti-lgbtq? There's some reason I've been boycotting home depot-i can't quite remember
given the home depot demographic i wouldn’t be surprised
Hobby Lobby
He is, but you gotta pretend if you are trying to sell crap to the hogs.
Western activism really is boycotting a company you would never shop at regardless for a reason you don't remember
19:11 Who got Cumtown in my Chapo?
Too many ad breaks to listen. Mainstream media isn't even this bad. 20 ad breaks in an hour, sod off.
just get adblock like everyone else .....
is felix doing a bit where he has to plug everything he's ever done on this ep?
But you guys are wrong as fuck about Hawk Newsome. That guy works round the clock for his cause; even good people can get caught in crapola these days.
I'd like to see Road Warrior Hawk send him through a table
The relationship between educational attainment and genes is complicated, and we are still at the beginning of trying to disentangling this. The fact that genes play a role in educational outcomes has been established decades ago with twin studies, whereby identical twins, who share 100% of their DNA, were compared to fraternal twins, who share as much DNA as a normal pair of siblings. Like all behavioral traits that were studied in twins, identical twins were more likely to have similar educational levels than fraternal twins, which is a strong indication that the trait is heritable. The heritability of educational attainment has been estimated to be ~40%. More recently, geneticists have been able to pin-point specific locations in the genome that are responsible for these heritability estimates. The effects of individual genetic variants are very small, so very large sample sizes are required to reach sufficient statistical power to identify these tiny effects. In 2013, the first three variants were detected in a study where DNA was measured for 126,000 individuals. Larger studies followed soon thereafter, with the most recent study from 2018 consisting of 1.1 million individuals, which identified 1,271 genetic variants to be significantly associated with school performance. This number will certainly increase as these studies grow. In this latest study, all these small effects in aggregate explain about 10% of the individual differences in educational attainment.
Geneticists are now able to show, using molecular DNA measures, that the association between your genes and educational attainment can in part be explained by these indirect genetic effects that travel from your parents trough your rearing environment. This means that these genetic effects are about half as predictive of school outcomes in adopted children than in children that grew up with their biological parents. A similar effect is visible on a regional level as well. A recent study of 450,000 people from all over Great Britain showed that people with similar genetic propensities for educational attainment cluster together geographically, and that the geographic patterns of these genes strongly resemble regional differences in socio-economic status. The environmental living circumstances also differ greatly between these regions, resulting in regional differences in physical and mental health problems, which in turn has its impact on regional differences in educational attainment as well. Part of the associations between genes and educational attainment are due to these regional differences in environmental living circumstances, making these genes less predictive for educational attainment within regions than across the country.
Genomics is just starting to disentangle what these associations between our genes and school performance mean, and the field still have a long way to go. There are a number of directions in which this research will continue. Firstly, geneticists will continue to increase the sample sizes, so they can produce better estimates of the genetic effects and identify more associated genetic variants. These larger studies will have to be conducted within families and within regions as well in order to control for the environmental influences that artificially inflate the estimated genetic effects, while also learning more about the indirect genetic effects of the genes carried by the people around us. Secondly, they will have to tease out through which lower-level traits these genetic variants express themselves. Genes do not directly influence educational attainment, instead they influence biological processes that are associated with a wide range of lower level outcomes that together have an influence on your school performance. These lower-level outcomes include things like intelligence and personality, but also outcomes related to physical and mental health. Finally, once they have teased out through which traits the genetic effects travel, it will perhaps become more feasible to start learning more about all the layers of complex biological processes in between these traits and our DNA sequence.
Genetics could help raise awareness about the difficulty that substantial parts of the population have with climbing the socio-economic ladder in an increasingly complex society. Policy makers often overlook the role of genetics in the rapidly growing social inequalities. When we disregard genetics, we end up in a society where everyone is expected to have the capability to perform well in school and on the job market, and whoever does not is likely to be regarded as not having worked hard enough. Accepting that both genetics and environmental influences have a role in people’s failures and achievements might bring us a little bit closer to building a more fair society.
As long as health care is private and for profit that kind of system will flatter and ossify the existing stratification in society. Even the most well-intentioned genetic scheme, when governed under logic of money and profit, becomes social darwinism and eugenics. God's design of evolution leaves some things to chance, and other things to individual choice - who are we to 'fix' every aspect of His selective design. Our reductionism is demonstrably harming the ecology of this planet which has been leased to us. No machine ever made by man can compare to the dynamic complexity of God's work. Not to say people should eschew science and medicine, but they have a right to question any system that is imposed by other humans and is unreasonably 'one size fits all'.
Ain’t nobody gonna read that
@@MilesBont they are making a rather banal argument that genetics influence academic success and we should redesign the education system to reflect this. But anyone can make the Pascal's Wager that they are more than the checksum of their 23&Me.txt.
How is academic success measured? It is well known that the education system has a problem with implicit and explicit bias.
Lots of Jews in this documentary
this is not a very refined or stoic thing to say
@@TrichordoKostas actually Marcus Aurelius was a massive anti-Semite
@@bjorntv6951 damn his book was pretty fruity but maybe the guy had some good sides.
There are facts that were once known, sometimes generally known, that are now known to but a few. Some of this information loss is caused by changes in occupational patterns - farmers automatically know something about heritability, clerks and workers in dark satanic mills, and Chapo viewers, not so much.
But mostly these facts are unpleasant, at least to some ears. People who mention such facts are punished - generally in terms of their careers, not being invited to parties, etc. That’s enough to cause a 10 or 20-fold drop in visibility, which ought to tell you something about how brave people are. Many people assume that everyone is secretly aware of those unpleasant facts, but that is not the case. A generation that has grown up never hearing those facts will be almost entirely unaware of them, in part because their personal life experiences don’t impinge on those patterns much. This means that they can and sometimes do make serious mistakes that those ‘secretly aware’ types never would.
There are a lot of facts like this. It’s made even worse by charlatans spewing falsehoods - sometimes that’s all that the typical undergraduate is exposed to. For example, average brain size is not the same in all human populations. Average cranial capacity in Europeans is about 1362 ccs; 1380 in Asians, 1276 in Africans. It’s about 1270 in New Guinea. Generally there is a trend with latitude - brain volume is lowest near the equator. And no, despite Gould’s bushwa, there is nothing especially difficult about measuring brain volume. Direct measurement of a healthy brain is best; but that is now done, using magnetic resonance imagery, and the results are about the same - a mean black-white difference of about 1 standard deviation.
Graduate students in anthropology generally don’t know those facts about average brain volume in different populations. Some of those students stumbled onto claims about such differences and emailed a physical anthropologist I know, asking if those differences really exist. He tells them ‘yep’ - I’m not sure what happens next. Most likely they keep their mouths shut. Ain’t it great, living in a free country?
1) Scientific American posted a story about brain size having a slight correlation to intelligence in 2016, so no, this information is not so taboo that you’ll be blackballed for discussing it
2) what will get you blackballed is what you say next. If you try to justify violence against anyone because of something as unreliable as brain size, you’re a scumbag. Intelligence is neither an excuse nor a justification for subjugation or oppression. This is even more unreliable when you try to equate brain size to skin color.
At the end of the day, there’s nothing you can do with this information. It’s not substantial or reliable enough to use in any capacity and the things you’d try to use it for can still be opposed on moral or ethical grounds.
3) holy shit, I can’t believe I’m responding to a skull size person.
We're still talking about craniology? Do you fuckers actively try to be wrong? What are you going to do about unreliable different cranium sizes in some populations?
Is this copypasta or something way more depressing?
”I’m not sure what happens next”
Then why would you care?
Dude I hope your an actual Neo-Nazi or something, at least it would signify an ethos & a spine..lmao!!!!