@@JonathanPalfrey I don’t know enough, but my assumption is that if DJI and Rode can put it into their receivers, we can get it in a camera! I have to own my ignorance, though.
People don't talk about it because it's technically an amateur sound guys dream, if u know audio 24 bit won't clip and u should be monitoring your audio instead of 32 bit float fixing all amateur mistakes...thats the general consensus on 32bit float its a not needed amateur fixer
@@Shuttterbugg I’m sorry if I personally offended you. For a solo filmmaker, the less one has to worry about the better. And everyone makes mistakes. I see no reason to not include it if it can be done.
@@Shuttterbugg but that’s like calling autofocus and raw amateur features? No ‘Pro’ needs those features to produce a good image however they are all great features which for pros makes shoots easier, add flexibility and a layer of insurance for certain circumstances. I agree you should always monitor with headphones however what’s the harm also having 32 bit float as a layer of back up?
I like the rumor of keeping quad bayer for low light and going to 6K, bumping dr and low light. Since the current 12mp sensor starts at 4X or 45mp this one will have to start above 80mp. Some crazy good 6K.
Regarding to the duo usb-c I would love this and I would go even further and hope that usb-c will replace the hdmi port with protocols like thunderbolt there is no technical argument against it in data transfer speed and imho there are only positive effects like smaller ports and cables and ofc only one type of cable to care and carry around
Oh man🔥 You said all the things that was in my mind for a long time, You revealed me😅, I was always thinking about: - Global shutter - Internal Raw - ND Even just adding global shutter & internal raw will be game changer if they don’t increase the price. Thanks for this awesome video🔥
Not sure what the situation is however there has been talk that Canon and Nikon paid Red to be able to use raw. Sony may have also paid them for the Venice and Burano, I guess with the bigger profit margin on those cameras it’s worth taking the hit.
Nice list. I would add wireless audio input from a Sony wireless microphone. Similar to what DJI is done with the pocket three. I would be all over that.
@@MightyThor10 always a personal choice. But if it’s something you can make money from then get the FX3 now. You can always sell it and upgrade later. That said if you already have a camera that does everything you currently need or you don’t currently need a camera then perhaps it will be worth waiting. It’s impossible to know when it will come though, best guess at the moment seems to be September at the earliest. It will probably cost more than the current FX3 as I’d imagine they will continue to sell the mark 1
One thing I would want is the ability to monitor sound with my wireless earbuds ! Why can't we do that in 2024, seems so simple and obvious with our phones, how many times I tried to step away from my camera and the wire almost made me drop my camera to the floor
Latency would be an issue with bluetooth but what about if Sony released headphones that work like a Rode wireless go in reverse? Transmitter built into the camera and receiver built in to the headphones. That would be pretty cool.
@@SuperPhunThyme100 @JonathanPalfrey Although not totally built in option but I use the Sennheiser HD 350BT and a MaedHawk aptX Low Latency 3.5mm trx no latancy and gives me wireless :D
If sony wont support a reasonable editable RAW codec for davinci resolve , they will see many customers like me switching to bm or Panasonic. Its overdue. My fx3 needs to do it as well. Pro Res is amazing but Premiere is not state of the art. Dislike these challenges which are political driven against development. Nice video!!
I'm only halfway into the video and i might be wrong by saying this but, although i think only sony and canon got means to such improvements, they'll never do it. There's a conflict of interest when we talk prosumer x professional cameras. Fujifilm doesn't have a Cinema line to upgrade to, so their cameras are packed with features (ie open gate, 14bit readout)
It's true that's always been a problem with Canon and Sony. I'd hope the likes of Blackmagic, RED and Panasonic may push them a bit but sadly that probably wont be the case.
I think they will as they have the tech and can make a big announcement about it but I agree, dynamic range improvements would be preferred and far more useful. The current FX3's rolling shutter is absolutely fine.
i think with 12MP sensor will be easier to not lose dynamic range, compare to A9iii, and of course with some additional features to improve dynamic ranges.
Well v raptor x has an 8k ff global shutter "without" compromise. I'm not expecting a global shutter on fx3m2. But maybe other cinema line up. Maybe venice 3 and burano 2 first. The FX line will follow. Fx9m2 is possible cuz it has a 6k sensor. We will see
@@balarol thnx for the reply. But I didn't forget about it. It is just funny after Sony s announcement Red want to answer with their tech to be the first again. But I don't mind that. It is great for us as consumers :). Sony will deliver and surprise us again for sure.
Nobody’s talking about 32-bit float! That’s a no-brainer feature for the next-gen audio module.
Another one I forgot! Yeah It makes no sense why 32-bit float hasn't appeared in a camera yet.
I guess it would require some sort of new codec?
@@JonathanPalfrey I don’t know enough, but my assumption is that if DJI and Rode can put it into their receivers, we can get it in a camera! I have to own my ignorance, though.
People don't talk about it because it's technically an amateur sound guys dream, if u know audio 24 bit won't clip and u should be monitoring your audio instead of 32 bit float fixing all amateur mistakes...thats the general consensus on 32bit float its a not needed amateur fixer
@@Shuttterbugg I’m sorry if I personally offended you. For a solo filmmaker, the less one has to worry about the better. And everyone makes mistakes. I see no reason to not include it if it can be done.
@@Shuttterbugg but that’s like calling autofocus and raw amateur features?
No ‘Pro’ needs those features to produce a good image however they are all great features which for pros makes shoots easier, add flexibility and a layer of insurance for certain circumstances.
I agree you should always monitor with headphones however what’s the harm also having 32 bit float as a layer of back up?
All I want is Global shutter and 4:3 open gate and I will upgrade day one.
I will too if it has those features
6k, internal NDs, and 32 bit float and I’d never sell this thing.
I like the rumor of keeping quad bayer for low light and going to 6K, bumping dr and low light. Since the current 12mp sensor starts at 4X or 45mp this one will have to start above 80mp. Some crazy good 6K.
Regarding to the duo usb-c
I would love this and I would go even further and hope that usb-c will replace the hdmi port with protocols like thunderbolt there is no technical argument against it in data transfer speed and imho there are only positive effects like smaller ports and cables and ofc only one type of cable to care and carry around
It would be nice. We’re seeing this on Nikons so hopefully it will be a song feature in future too
Oh man🔥
You said all the things that was in my mind for a long time,
You revealed me😅,
I was always thinking about:
- Global shutter
- Internal Raw
- ND
Even just adding global shutter & internal raw will be game changer if they don’t increase the price.
Thanks for this awesome video🔥
actually you just described the Sony Burano 😂
Thanks for the video, interesting !
Maybe they can stick it in the dryer so it shrinks to the size of an FX3 😂
RAW question ! Why Sony has to pay RED ( for their Raw pattent) ? I though Sony got their own internal Raw ( in the burano)
Not sure what the situation is however there has been talk that Canon and Nikon paid Red to be able to use raw. Sony may have also paid them for the Venice and Burano, I guess with the bigger profit margin on those cameras it’s worth taking the hit.
Do you think it's possible to see a Sony fx3 II by the end of this year?
Nice list. I would add wireless audio input from a Sony wireless microphone. Similar to what DJI is done with the pocket three. I would be all over that.
Oh I forgot that one! Totally agree!
So should I wait for it ínstese of buying FX3?.
How much do you think it could cost ?
If you need a camera now, the FX3 is a great camera and it will still be a great camera after a mark 2 has been released.
@@JonathanPalfrey is not urgent, i could wait and safe money for the mk2.
What would you recomend me to do?
Wait for mk2?
@@MightyThor10 always a personal choice. But if it’s something you can make money from then get the FX3 now. You can always sell it and upgrade later. That said if you already have a camera that does everything you currently need or you don’t currently need a camera then perhaps it will be worth waiting.
It’s impossible to know when it will come though, best guess at the moment seems to be September at the earliest.
It will probably cost more than the current FX3 as I’d imagine they will continue to sell the mark 1
One thing I would want is the ability to monitor sound with my wireless earbuds ! Why can't we do that in 2024, seems so simple and obvious with our phones, how many times I tried to step away from my camera and the wire almost made me drop my camera to the floor
Latency is the issue.
Latency would be an issue with bluetooth but what about if Sony released headphones that work like a Rode wireless go in reverse? Transmitter built into the camera and receiver built in to the headphones. That would be pretty cool.
@@JonathanPalfrey heck yeah!!
Although not totally built in option but I use the Sennheiser HD 350BT and a MaedHawk aptX Low Latency 3.5mm trx no latancy and gives me wireless :D
@@SuperPhunThyme100 @JonathanPalfrey Although not totally built in option but I use the Sennheiser HD 350BT and a MaedHawk aptX Low Latency 3.5mm trx no latancy and gives me wireless :D
I sold my Fx3 for a Zv-E1 and honestly i didnt regret it. However if the Fx3 mark ii comes with AI features and 2.7k res i would buy it.
Interesting, I'd love to try the ZV-E1. Sadly I can't justify getting one just to play around or use for UA-cam.
8:35 correction the fx6 is getting in camera false color metering option in the next firmware update...
Is that in camera? I thought it was only with app. Great news if that's the case and massively increases the chance of seeing it on the next FX3
Its only in the app, not in camera.
and an HDMI cheap connection that doesn't move after a few uses !!!! It's a real issue for those who uses external monitor.
Yeah SDI would be nice or HDMI port with some sort of locking built in.
6k sensor
If sony wont support a reasonable editable RAW codec for davinci resolve , they will see many customers like me switching to bm or Panasonic. Its overdue. My fx3 needs to do it as well. Pro Res is amazing but Premiere is not state of the art. Dislike these challenges which are political driven against development. Nice video!!
you've been heard
The A1 is getting a 12 bit color depth ... could be in the fx3ii
What you mean by A1 getting 12 bit??
@@balarol 12 bit video is the rumor
@@alansarpy and we didnt get it
I'm only halfway into the video and i might be wrong by saying this but, although i think only sony and canon got means to such improvements, they'll never do it.
There's a conflict of interest when we talk prosumer x professional cameras. Fujifilm doesn't have a Cinema line to upgrade to, so their cameras are packed with features (ie open gate, 14bit readout)
It's true that's always been a problem with Canon and Sony. I'd hope the likes of Blackmagic, RED and Panasonic may push them a bit but sadly that probably wont be the case.
Why aren’t they coating screens to remove all those nasty reflections when it’s sunny day?
they won't bring global shutter. people want more dynamic range
I think they will as they have the tech and can make a big announcement about it but I agree, dynamic range improvements would be preferred and far more useful. The current FX3's rolling shutter is absolutely fine.
i think with 12MP sensor will be easier to not lose dynamic range, compare to A9iii, and of course with some additional features to improve dynamic ranges.
Well v raptor x has an 8k ff global shutter "without" compromise. I'm not expecting a global shutter on fx3m2. But maybe other cinema line up. Maybe venice 3 and burano 2 first. The FX line will follow. Fx9m2 is possible cuz it has a 6k sensor. We will see
@@jonhuij i think you forget about Sony a9iii, if a9 have global shutter with 24MP sensor,
it’s not a big deal for FX3m2.
@@balarol thnx for the reply. But I didn't forget about it. It is just funny after Sony s announcement Red want to answer with their tech to be the first again. But I don't mind that. It is great for us as consumers :). Sony will deliver and surprise us again for sure.
The price is going to be so much higher with all of these features.
I’m sure the price will go up but it shouldn’t by much. These are just the advancements you’d expect in 3 years.
Shutter angle is comming for FX3 in september. It's on the website
Am I the only one that wants an open gate ?
👏👏👏🎹🎬