+ChiiMarquel +Professor Messer I have had Costco hot dogs many times before, and they are indeed extremely delicious for the price. I highly recommend getting a packet of the grated parmesan cheese and red pepper flakes if you like it a bit spicy. I also love putting some ketchup and deli-style mustard as well as pickle relish. Juicy, but delicious all the same.
@@kirisutegomen12 Not necessarily. They're two different routing protocol schemes that are fit for different applications. RIP, for example, is still sometimes used on the extremes - it's used in smaller environments where your gear may not support the more 'robust' routing protocols (OSPF, IS-IS, EIGRP, etc.) / where your environment doesn't need anything more than "here's some updates sent at 30 sec intervals" and it's useful in cases where it's not worth the control plane resources to maintain thousands of routing relationships (e.g. ISP CE-PE routing). Plus, EIGRP (though it has *some* link-state elements in it) is still largely distance-vector in terms of the logic of the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) and it's definitely not obsoleted, since it's still used in a lot of Cisco environments/applications (e.g. DMVPN). Plus, even if your network is not homogenous in terms of using purely Cisco equipment (which, many are not), it is important to note that route redistribution and injecting AS-external routes is a thing and that you can run multiple routing protocols. You just have to be careful with the design for that. TL;DR - there's a place for both.
It depends on who you ask, and when. Cisco has traditionally referred to EIGRP as a hybrid protocol, but most recently has re-categorized it as distance-vector.
being 3x through the study material from 3 different sources, this is the one that explains it the best. thank you
Thank you professor Messer for this quality content! You have helped me better myself. I respect your hustle.
thank you so much for doing what you do Professor Messer! you have been helping me grasp the concepts of the Network+ exam, I appreciate you
Great, hot dogs will forever remind me of Link-state Routing.
It's a good mnemonic.
Seriously considering dropping reading the book to follow these slides, great explanation. Jk on dropping the book part, still need some history
I went to Costco and thought about Link-State Routing while eating a hot dog in the food court :|
OSPF for $1.50. Not bad.
+ChiiMarquel +Professor Messer I have had Costco hot dogs many times before, and they are indeed extremely delicious for the price. I highly recommend getting a packet of the grated parmesan cheese and red pepper flakes if you like it a bit spicy. I also love putting some ketchup and deli-style mustard as well as pickle relish. Juicy, but delicious all the same.
Are there any advantages to using Distance-Vectoring over Link-State?
less real estate and low costs
Distance vector is obsolete
@@kirisutegomen12 Not necessarily. They're two different routing protocol schemes that are fit for different applications. RIP, for example, is still sometimes used on the extremes - it's used in smaller environments where your gear may not support the more 'robust' routing protocols (OSPF, IS-IS, EIGRP, etc.) / where your environment doesn't need anything more than "here's some updates sent at 30 sec intervals" and it's useful in cases where it's not worth the control plane resources to maintain thousands of routing relationships (e.g. ISP CE-PE routing).
Plus, EIGRP (though it has *some* link-state elements in it) is still largely distance-vector in terms of the logic of the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) and it's definitely not obsoleted, since it's still used in a lot of Cisco environments/applications (e.g. DMVPN). Plus, even if your network is not homogenous in terms of using purely Cisco equipment (which, many are not), it is important to note that route redistribution and injecting AS-external routes is a thing and that you can run multiple routing protocols. You just have to be careful with the design for that.
TL;DR - there's a place for both.
very helpful
is EIGRP a hybrid protocol, isn't it?
It depends on who you ask, and when. Cisco has traditionally referred to EIGRP as a hybrid protocol, but most recently has re-categorized it as distance-vector.
@@professormesser I see. I'd like to know how CompTIA defines it.
You can refer to the CompTIA Exam Objectives for specific definitions, and my videos are based on those objectives.
@@professormesser Thank you!
Good