This video was made in collaboration with: Ancient Sight -> www.youtube.com/@ancientsight He is a fellow history tuber who makes amazing videos about the ancient and medieval world. Head over to Ancient Sight to explore more epic content and make sure to subscribe to his amazing channel!
You have to realise a lot of credit goes to Agrippa for being one of the greatest Roman Generals and being on Octavian's side. With the political genius of Octavian and military efficiency of Agrippa, both were able to cut down any opposition. Unfortunately for Mark Antony and Sextus Pompey though...
I don't think that Augustus was a malevolent evil genius as made out in this video. Fun fact: the terms "Emperor" & "Empire" were not known then as we know today. The naughty no, no title of Dictator was what they had back then which signified a tyrant - something which Augustus wanted to avoid. In fact, had you lived up until even the reign of Justinian, the Romans would still refer to the Roman state as the "Republic" / Res-publica or the "public thing." Moreover, in the time of Augustus' rise to power most of the Senate and the people were concerned mainly with stability following years of ongoing civil wars. The title of "Imperator" (where we get the modern term for Emperor) was an official title for "one who holds command" who was bestowed the title and acted in place of the Senate. This was given to several individuals over the years to deal with problems within Roman territory which were far from the Senate. Furthermore, due multiple Imperators who raised troops and took action in the name of the Roman Senate, the legions owed more loyalty to their commanders (Imperators) than the Senate itself as seen during Caesar's wars. When Augustus had defeated Mark Anthony he was the remaining Imperator and the sole military authority at that point who could bring peace to Rome since all the legions obeyed only one Imperator now. The Senate found this useful to finally bring an end to years of endless civil wars. Thus Augustus remained Imperator, whose chair sat in between the two Roman Consuls, who was a member and also held accountable to the Roman Senate. Over the years, further powers were granted to the office of Imperator such as the veto power held by the Tribunes of the Plebs, the powers of the Censor, etc. The title of "Princeps" was an honorific title bestowed to Augustus and successors which essentially meant "First Citizen" and was thus intended to be the first among equals in the Senate. The office of Imperator never really became an "Emperor" as we know it today in the sense of an absolute monarchy until Diocletian. I'd recommend reading "Caesar: Life of a Colossus" and "Augustus" by Adrian Goldsworthy.
Amazing video.. big fan of yours and big fan of Greco-Roman history .. because of that I would like to see complete series like this about Greek history from Minoans, Spartans, Alexander and war of Diadoch and everything in-between .. and finally until fall under Rome (which is in fact this series continuation of)
One thing, you forgot switzerland and a part of germany, known s baden. They where a part of Roman Empire to, even the oldes bridage in germany was made by Romans
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage video about Roman Empire rules creation... which was a conjunction between Rome internal competitions and legions conscription + imperial borders wars
I must say Octavius/Augustus lived to be very old for the medieval period with very little knowledge on diseases and viruses and Doctors had very little cures and experience for such things. Sadly not many people make it too 75 years old today in most countries and this is 2000 years later
This is not the medieval period, and it could easily be argued that the period of antiquity in which this took place, had people eating much better, and within cities like rome, there were public baths and lavatories. Rome was also much more sanitary than probably any european medieval city due to their sewage systems.
I wouldn't say that. Succession in form of adopting didn't/don't work well. When done correctly ;) family/dynasty inheritance like father-son is the best option, not necessarily the inheritance of the eldest son/descendant, but of the most capable. Of course, with rules, according to laws and precisely given procedures, so that it is not a completely free succession that could cause disputes and a fight for the throne. The most important thing is always the system/organization. BTW When it is done correctly than almost anything is good working. ;) But it must be done corretly and there is a question, what is the reality here, the probability of sustainability of the right course. Hereditary monarchy works best, if "only" in some Primogeniture system.
Rome followed Alexander the Great. When his generals were fighting amongst themselves, Rome conquered their territories, mined gold and silver, and stamped coins to pay for bigger armies. The end.
For sure, back is those days, the Romans knew how to do and "write" a good movie script... With all the important ingredients, they could made a good story for History...
Why should they? On the scale of the fate of the Roman empire he was inconsequential. I'm more surprised they didn't even mention Sextus Pompeius or the battle/power struggle with Anthony (oh so many juicy details left out)
Arminius was regionally significant in stopping Roman ambitions across the Rhine and it was a traumatizing event for the Romans. But I don't see him relevant in the picture of the Empire
The Roman Empire was one of the best places to be a citizen of. Despite it being an aristocracy, compared to other nations of the time, it was very liberal. Roman citizens had more civil liberties than any where else in that world at the time, even women had more rights than any where else in the world at the time. A measure not matched until the creation of the US.
There's an awful lot of mind-reading in this video. If you're speculating about the motives of people over a thousand years ago, you should probably make it clear you're just speculating.
Rome is not to be glorified, these people killed Yahusha. (Pontius Pilate) the Roman governor of Judea (26-37 AD) who crucified Christ. They will fall amongst his RETURN
Horrible script writing. How many times are you going to say "thus"? And you can't even use that properly... who writes this stuff? Ugh!! God awful....
This video was made in collaboration with: Ancient Sight -> www.youtube.com/@ancientsight
He is a fellow history tuber who makes amazing videos about the ancient and medieval world. Head over to Ancient Sight to explore more epic content and make sure to subscribe to his amazing channel!
This one was fun..
Where is the first 9 parts? You guys have no playlist or anything with them.
Octavius/Augustus was quite the emperor. Julius Caesar would have definitely been proud.
Julius be like “that’s my boy”
You have to realise a lot of credit goes to Agrippa for being one of the greatest Roman Generals and being on Octavian's side. With the political genius of Octavian and military efficiency of Agrippa, both were able to cut down any opposition.
Unfortunately for Mark Antony and Sextus Pompey though...
That was the best achievement which Lord Augustus made in establishing the Roman Empire,good friends!!!🙏🏻
Arp den hoarf den shröffelp den skrop?,
Cicero would be proud in that regard.
@@guavaguy4397 cicero would say depek sounds like he got a shovel up his skrop sideways 🥴😭
I don't think that Augustus was a malevolent evil genius as made out in this video. Fun fact: the terms "Emperor" & "Empire" were not known then as we know today. The naughty no, no title of Dictator was what they had back then which signified a tyrant - something which Augustus wanted to avoid. In fact, had you lived up until even the reign of Justinian, the Romans would still refer to the Roman state as the "Republic" / Res-publica or the "public thing." Moreover, in the time of Augustus' rise to power most of the Senate and the people were concerned mainly with stability following years of ongoing civil wars. The title of "Imperator" (where we get the modern term for Emperor) was an official title for "one who holds command" who was bestowed the title and acted in place of the Senate. This was given to several individuals over the years to deal with problems within Roman territory which were far from the Senate. Furthermore, due multiple Imperators who raised troops and took action in the name of the Roman Senate, the legions owed more loyalty to their commanders (Imperators) than the Senate itself as seen during Caesar's wars. When Augustus had defeated Mark Anthony he was the remaining Imperator and the sole military authority at that point who could bring peace to Rome since all the legions obeyed only one Imperator now. The Senate found this useful to finally bring an end to years of endless civil wars. Thus Augustus remained Imperator, whose chair sat in between the two Roman Consuls, who was a member and also held accountable to the Roman Senate. Over the years, further powers were granted to the office of Imperator such as the veto power held by the Tribunes of the Plebs, the powers of the Censor, etc. The title of "Princeps" was an honorific title bestowed to Augustus and successors which essentially meant "First Citizen" and was thus intended to be the first among equals in the Senate. The office of Imperator never really became an "Emperor" as we know it today in the sense of an absolute monarchy until Diocletian. I'd recommend reading "Caesar: Life of a Colossus" and "Augustus" by Adrian Goldsworthy.
So, Diocletian is the first imperator who bring Rome back into monarch model?
AKA DESPOT
ISRAEL DID NOT ATTAIN ITS GOAL; RESIST THE DEVIL AND HE WILL FLEE
SOME OF YOU SAY I AM OF APOLLOS, I AM OF PAULOS, I AM OF JESUS😂🎉
No canes VENATICI revelations 22:15-19. It is finished PSALM 23 don't go to GILGAL Amos 5:5
Ironic that Augustus died in August, a month he named for himself!
No, it's just perfect
Ancient Sight is such a gem of a channel
Amazing video.. big fan of yours and big fan of Greco-Roman history .. because of that I would like to see complete series like this about Greek history from Minoans, Spartans, Alexander and war of Diadoch and everything in-between .. and finally until fall under Rome (which is in fact this series continuation of)
Greatly appreciate working with you !
Hey man! It has been great working with you on this video! More to come :)
Love your content when will next vid come out, will it be about the twenty years anarchy?
@@playingthroughhistory7710 Working on a quite big video on the Ostrogoths at the moment. 20 years of anarchy will most probably be after that
Waoooo
Powerful Narration.
I enjoyed every bit.
Augustus' last words have been stylised as follows:
if I have done well, give loud applause, shouts of joy in this actor's cause.
This is so cool! Thank you for the knowledge!
Hope you do one video about the insane 3rd Emperor Caligula.
awesome epic narrator.
Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus was a total badass, just like his great uncle.
can't wait for the next part
Great story ❤❤
This ancient history documentary has sparked my curiosity to learn even more about these ancient civilizations! 📖🔥
Ngl before Ceasar came the Punic wars was crazy good
Awesome information. Everyday I think about Rome Empire, just the song on SNL.
Why modern Italians didn't used "S", end words in their names now like Maximus, Agustus
One thing, you forgot switzerland and a part of germany, known s baden. They where a part of Roman Empire to, even the oldes bridage in germany was made by Romans
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage video about Roman Empire rules creation... which was a conjunction between Rome internal competitions and legions conscription + imperial borders wars
I must say Octavius/Augustus lived to be very old for the medieval period with very little knowledge on diseases and viruses and Doctors had very little cures and experience for such things. Sadly not many people make it too 75 years old today in most countries and this is 2000 years later
History: Hahahaha no
This is not the medieval period, and it could easily be argued that the period of antiquity in which this took place, had people eating much better, and within cities like rome, there were public baths and lavatories. Rome was also much more sanitary than probably any european medieval city due to their sewage systems.
Great Job.
I enjoyed every bit.
GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR TEAM
Amazing 💯
Augustus was a sort of prototype for the adoptive emperors. When done correctly, adopting was the best option, especially outside the family.
I wouldn't say that. Succession in form of adopting didn't/don't work well. When done correctly ;) family/dynasty inheritance like father-son is the best option, not necessarily the inheritance of the eldest son/descendant, but of the most capable. Of course, with rules, according to laws and precisely given procedures, so that it is not a completely free succession that could cause disputes and a fight for the throne. The most important thing is always the system/organization.
BTW When it is done correctly than almost anything is good working. ;) But it must be done corretly and there is a question, what is the reality here, the probability of sustainability of the right course. Hereditary monarchy works best, if "only" in some Primogeniture system.
Wouldn't it have been more logical if he called himself October instead of Augustus?
very good video, too bad it doesnt have more views
Agrippa-5 sons? I only heard of 3, Lucius Gauis Postumus
Why didn't you show his campaign into Germania?
18:31 / 24:41
Gayus Octavius
The man had an incredible degree of political foresight.
Great video, but I believe you meant to say “Caesar” was a title given to every emperor following Octavian, not “Augustus.”
I'm a simple guy.
I see "Roman Empire"
*I click*
We all are
Rome was an empire way before Augustus. Augustus was the first emperor after the republic fell.
Rome followed Alexander the Great. When his generals were fighting amongst themselves, Rome conquered their territories, mined gold and silver, and stamped coins to pay for bigger armies. The end.
Romans: Civil wars are good
Next video will be the rise of publica?
For sure, back is those days, the Romans knew how to do and "write" a good movie script...
With all the important ingredients, they could made a good story for History...
Roman Empire didn't just slaughtered roman republic but whole rome in subsequent distant future..
At what point did The Roman Republic become known as The Roman Empire because your last video and this video just called it simply Rome
The Romans throughout their whole history pretended to be a republic
no mention of Arminius ???
Why should they?
On the scale of the fate of the Roman empire he was inconsequential.
I'm more surprised they didn't even mention Sextus Pompeius or the battle/power struggle with Anthony (oh so many juicy details left out)
Arminius was regionally significant in stopping Roman ambitions across the Rhine and it was a traumatizing event for the Romans.
But I don't see him relevant in the picture of the Empire
The Roman Empire was one of the best places to be a citizen of. Despite it being an aristocracy, compared to other nations of the time, it was very liberal. Roman citizens had more civil liberties than any where else in that world at the time, even women had more rights than any where else in the world at the time. A measure not matched until the creation of the US.
New part
Cool , would have been excellent if you added The birth of the baby Jesus Christ in Bethlehem
He’s no Pompy but who is
gypsy people were badass
Hail Augustus!!!
Similar to America, on the backs on other groups.
You mean European immigrants, you are crazy and racist, brother
Why the ecclesiastical latin pronunciation? Prin-cheps? Really???
There's an awful lot of mind-reading in this video. If you're speculating about the motives of people over a thousand years ago, you should probably make it clear you're just speculating.
Rome is not to be glorified, these people killed Yahusha. (Pontius Pilate) the Roman governor of Judea (26-37 AD) who crucified Christ. They will fall amongst his RETURN
Romans cruc1f1ed a conspirator-instigator-cult leader.
@@EA_customersupport when you’re burning for eternity, look up and tell us how that fire feels
@@BaynesBros
Such tolerance from a sh1tty religion.
Now you know why romans cruc1fied the cult leader.
This guy does not represent Christianity@@EA_customersupport
@@BaynesBros
Rome is literally the reason why you're "Christian" right now.
Saint Constantine the Great. Look him up.
Also, protestantism is heresy
Horrible script writing. How many times are you going to say "thus"? And you can't even use that properly... who writes this stuff? Ugh!! God awful....