Digital Wireless mics compared | Shure vs Audio-Technica vs Sennheiser | GLXD vs EW D1 vs System 10

We compare the audio from three (3) of the most popular digital wireless microphone systems in that operate in the 2.4 GHz spectrum.
We compare the SHURE GLX-D, Audio-technica System 10, and the Sennheiser EW D1 systems. By using the SHURE QLX-D system it is also unofficially thrown in to the mix.
All the audio in the comparison is recorded through XLR outputs and inputs to a digital mixer, and recorded raw directly into the iphone camera. All EQs were off (flat), and no pre & post processing was done.

[@kdsz944]

58 is clearly the best one.Its mid range is what it makes it sound like a pro mic, while the rest are just hyped this or that way....

[@LoveMoneySecretsTV]

Shure. GLXD 2. at 6:55 min. runs 12 to 14 hours on Shure proprietary battery ($30 approx) nice. Sounds from your review like it's a more temperamental mic. Nice to know what microphone your using Shure QLXD runs 400-500 GHz (10:14 ). at 21.34 he does comparison with each microphone

[@echoems]

i'm quite bothered by the handling noise on the audio technica, but how was it in actual use? i'm considering this as my first wireless mic for church and other singing events.

[@dyosaganda5648]

Im using audiotechnica system10 and the sound is sow good..like sennheiser...👍☺💗💗💗

[@ronnieparfait]

“Hey Biff, get a load of this guy’s life preserver, Dork thinks he’s gonna drown!”

[@trungdo6852]

Can you please tell me where is each of these microphones made? Thank you very much

[@manuelpenaruiz3694]

Audio quality: is there a significant difference between the QLXD and Sennheiser D1? Thanks

[@pantanalordofdarkness9559]

Not sure how well I can trust a reviewer being an expert on the subject matter when his own audio on the video is so low that you can't hear it.

[@capeles9292]

😂

[@curiouskims]

Great review!

[@ReinaldoCrespo]

You prefer your QLXD systems over these new Digital Microphones?

[@tgbatg]

When possible, of course. As a FOH engineer, the QLXD system is the way to go. It has many high end features the 2.4GHz systems don't have. But it really depends on your use case. Some quick reasons why anyone should opt to get the QLXD over the 2.4 GHz systems: (1) working distance (2) need to run many channel simultaneously (2b) frequency coordination.

[@brucegarethgeorge]

The Audio Technica sounds better with speech. Less eq required. Vocals are clearer.

[@Gmail4ChromeSettings]

the sm58 head on the qlxd sounds better than the sm58 head on the glxd.

[@djrez2107]

2.4ghz mics are the worse invention ever. I had one and they drop out like crazy.

[@markhagopian3257]

Wish the poor guy knew how to turn his mic up enough to hear him.

[@robertlawson1184]

wait what........ A person doing mics review that didnt set proper mic level for viewers? 🤔 So why should i trust this guy's reviews now? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣

[@musicalpurpose2566]

You must have a cheap phone. I can hear him fine.

[@MGort-bb8op]

Dont by a 2,4GHz wireless microphone system.. even at 8m distance I get only dropouts..

[@deanle604]

Couldnt hear a dam thing what the heck you are saying. It is you call mic testing 😅😅😅

[@Krthaspecialist]

TOO LONG

[@deanle604]

What the ffff are you reviewing…