I opted for an ex+ used X1D II over the new X2D - saved me $5,000. I also got an 45mm P and a used 3.2 90mm that fulfills 95% of my needs. It is back to the basics with this camera and taking the time to savor it and the images it produces. I know the short coming and limitations, but they also make me slowdown, think, and create. No run and gun or drive-by shooting for me. I enjoy the experience of taking good photographs with this camera. Thanks.
Great review. I have the X1Dii and the 907x and they are amazing cameras. I thought Leica had the best build quality, but Hasselblad puts them to shame. Yes, they're expensive and have their flaws (if you need speed), but if photography is your art and you are inspired by things of beauty, you owe it to yourself to try the Hasselblad system.
Nice work with the review. I've got a Leica S and 3 Hasselblad HC lenses that I use with great results. Every time I see the X1D II, I think I want it. For anyone thinking of getting a Fuji, I believe the X1DII will produce more organic looking images.
The image quality is something else. I wish they had eye AF and IBIS, but I shot a model with this and don't feel I was lacking anything. That 80mm lens is magic. I want one!
Thank you for the video ! I love the built quality and finish of Hasselblad X1DII. Much better than Fuji cameras.(I have GFX100). Hopefully we can see X1D100C camera in the close future. BTW it would be nice to comparison video between XCD 80mm F1.9 vs Fuji GF 80mm F1.7.
Thanks for your enthusiastic review!! love the fact that you’ve mentioned the new grip that was so beautiful on the first version and aligned with the one on the lenses. Hope they will be back on this point (as design is one of their major strenght) on a future iteration that everyone is waiting to compete against the 100s. When are you making a video on image editing as I love the way you process your files!
Good review. The camera have its own market. It is for people who likes cameras and photography. People who is not on a rush. I hope to add the X1D 50C II to my bag soon. Thanks!!!
hi, do you think it is the best company when it comes to medium formats? I am for bigger sensors now. but I am new to it. and I wonder If I should wait for another generation of that camera. thank you so much for the review.
Old Video I know but I'm finally in the position to get into MF digital and I know I'm going the Hasselblad route even if it's a bit more than a GFX50s. I just Love the design of the camera and I have a 500CM so I feel it would be a great pair. I know I want to start off with a 45mm P lens but I'm just on the fence of getting the original or the MKii X1D. I know the difference is marginal with the OLED viewfinder and the larger screen on the back and a bit faster processing but I'm not of course looking at this camera for speed. I've used the original back when it came out and love the files. I can save about 700-1000$ by getting the original one. Would it be better to invest a bit more into a newer version?
Hi Bobby, I have a D850 camera with 4 Nikon lens from wide angle to to the 200mm to 400mm for wildlife. Had a Hasselblad CM 500 in the film days. Great camera, miss it. The Hasselblad was stolen a few years ago. I am interested in both the SL2s and the Hasselblad 907x as a 2nd camera I . As you have used all three camera brands do you think getting a Leica the images would not look much different from the D850? I like the colors coming from the X1D. Medium format is a different camera system so more like apple to oranges. Did you shot it with auto focus off? I am 70years old and hope my eyes could work with this camera. Thank you I like your reviews and your passion...
Hi Ron thanks for the comment. The 907x is a beautiful camera but not the easiest to use daily. There is no viewfinder and the rear display isn’t the brightest in daylight conditions. In Addition the usability will take some time to get use to. The Leica SL2S is a nice camera system but you won’t be gaining anything from the D850 except a more refined camera in terms of build and design. If you like Medium format perhaps look at the fujifilm GFX100S. Fast AF, good ergonomics and very good price considering.
@@TECH360TV Bobby thanks for your reply. I see that you did a review on the on the GFX 100s last week and I see you did a review on the GFX 100s camera so I will watch the review now. Maybe a better choice for me.
Yes, the 907x is a bit impractical but it is a thing of beauty and I’ll never sell mine. I also own both the Fuji 50’s. For me, 50 is enough and I’ve turned down the upgrade to 100MP. You will need to factor in your whole workflow from processor to storage. Will what you have cope? What I think the SL2-S would give you is access to Leica glass, and for me, it’s always about the glass.
Ok, you've convinced me to patiently way for the either the X2D or the mklll. Just do everything the GFX100s does and keep current body and menu system, possible?
Agreed , just look at what Fiji has achieved with the gfx100s . Hasselblad has to introduce ibis and eye autofocus and better focusing overall in its beautiful form factor
I can see what you say about the image quality makes you forget about what is lacking in the camera but what it has. That's true for me for the Sigma foveon cameras (DPxMs) despite what the other cameramen say. I wonder if you have tested those notorious cameras.
I have tested the SD Quattro H. I liked a lot about this camera but unfortunately you need a tripod for anything less than optimal light. The ISO usage is very limited. The image quality is spectacular when you get the right lighting though.
Thanks for a a great review. After seeing your review of this camera, I am also considering buying one. Your spectacle frame is incredibly nice and I wonder if you can name me that model.
I want to want this camera, but I've pre-order the Fuji GFX 100s. Autofocus, ibis, 100mp, cheaper lenses.... But man, many people talk about the colors and tones being better than the ones you find in Fujis cameras. I wonder if that alone is worth the pain of getting a slow and outdated camera, or just go with Fuji and learn how to massage the images to make them look this good. What's your view?
I think it depends on your use case. I’ve seen images using Pro Negative Hi that come close to the Hasselblad look. Not exact but close. I filmed this review around the same time of the GFX100S and here are my thoughts.: The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile Battery life was better on the 100 Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing. Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon Value: GFX wins. Menu: Hasselblad wins Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@TECH360TV I hear you. I guess the solution is a Hasselblad X1D mark iii, or X2D, with faster focus and ibis (if they keep delivering better colors and tones). So what to do... on the meantime I'll get the GFX 100s and most probably will sell it when on Hassy get their shit completely together with this MF camera. Thanks for your input, I will subscribe gladly
A great review as usual! I wish you also used the leaf shutter to your advantage for a couple samples (with flash), but nevertheless I am still drooling over it!
Great video. Totally convince me of purchasing this combination. And i'm from Singapore too! Just out of curiosity, where i could buy Hasselblad X1D II with 45P and 80 1.9? Please advise. Thanks.
2 роки тому
Congratulations!!! you have been selected among my few shortlisted giveaway winners message the above number to claim your prize.
So, question. I own a 907x with both the lenses in your review. While the 45P works well on the 907x, the 907x is a bit limited in portrait mode. One solution is the grip which I feel ruins the aesthetic. Is the X1DII the answer? If you had to chose between the two bodies to use both of these lenses, which would it be.
🤔 if I was in your shoes, I would look into the x1d ii. There was a lot of noise about how version 1 felt like an unfinished/rushed product. If you print, I think you would enjoy the system overall vs your Canon. Keep in mind that the AF is a substantial downgrade from an R5.
Thanks for sharing. I upgraded from the H5D to the X1DII in November and ordered the 45P and the 80 1,9. But both lenses was in backorder and still are..
I filmed this review around the same time of the GFX100S and here are my thoughts.: The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile. Pro Neg Hi seems to close the gap slightly. Battery life was better on the 100 Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing. Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon Value: GFX wins. Menu: Hasselblad wins Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@TECH360TV This is so true I mean long as the colors aren’t to far apart then small tweaks can be done in post if necessary at all. Long as the auto focus and ibis works I truly feel like the Fuji GFX100s is the best value overall and now I can afford a medium format camera to get that high end look without doing to much in post. Thanks again for you insight and keep these reviews coming
If we are talking internals, then you should compare it to GFX50R - same sensor, same crappy video features and no IBIS:) GFX100s is outperform this beautiful camera
That's a dream to have the big one in the little one the little one specifically just for pictures that look amazing like that gorgeous quality I am super impressed I'm set to go to get one love the bud and all the indo 👏👏👏
I’ve enjoyed mine for like the four sessions outside I’ve gotten to use it during this pandemic. Seeing the new GFX100s, I wonder if I made the right choice. But, I do like some things of the Hassey over Fuji. I will disagree on the grip though. It ain’t bad, but I don’t like it as much.
The 100S is a much faster camera and the IQ is well. It’s 102MP haha. The X1D is a beautiful camera, but compared to the 100s it’s showing it’s age tech wise. I hope Hasselblad comes out with something comparable to the 100S, but who knows. The 907x is stunning and one of the most beautiful cameras I’ve held. However you need to understand how it shoots and the lack of speed. To me the 100s is the everyday medium format camera. Fast, small, and versatile. The X1D is the medium format camera that you take out once in a while for special occasions.
@@TECH360TV At least the Hasselblad lenses appear to edge out Fujifilm's (Fuji's lenses are still awesome though). That's primarily the reason I chose Hasselblad.
The 100s is better. I do like Hasselblad color science more but for some reason reds can get out of control on the Blad. However skin tones are great and more true to color. Fujifilm you need to tweak a bit. Have to take in consideration the X1D sensor is a number of years old already so it’s dated.
As much as I absoloutely love and adore Hasselblad, you gotta admit, it definitely is overhyped! I just used the Fujifilm GFX100s, it I can honestly say I had a better experience. Hasselblad is simply playing catch up these days.
Hasselblad owner here - I would appreciate specific takes between it and Fuji. The absence can make it come across pretty strongly as sponsored content to me. In any case, still appreciate the video!
Hi. I filmed this video at the same time I had a chance to play with the 100S but due to embargo I was not allowed to compare. The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile Battery life was better on the 100 Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing. Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon Value: GFX wins. Menu: Hasselblad wins Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@astrostl understand. It’s hard to get all the cameras together at the same time, but I can tell you this: Design wise Hasselblad Color: sometimes Hasselblad sometimes Fujifilm. Hasselblad struggles with reds. Usability: Fujifilm Price and ROI: Fujifilm
@@TECH360TV FWIW not expecting to have an actual body-in-hand shootout, just that a verbal mention along those lines would go a long way toward making the videos come across as impartial to me. Only clarifying here, not beating a dead horse. Thanks for the videos!
While they do have best in class build quality; and they have phenomenal color science (so does Fuji).. but with all of the recent excellent cameras in Full Frame Mirrorless now (Canon R5, Sony A1 for example); and now you have Fuji's GFX 100S at 5999, basically $250 bucks more than this camera and with cheaper lens, but way better performance, I just don't see how Hasselblad can compete. Without the GFX100s; you can see the GFX100 was 10K, and humungous. The GFX 50S was large; more expensive. The GFX 50R was descent size, but didn't look as great, and was not comfortable to grip. While they had some advantages; hasselblad also had advantages that are inherent to the leaf shutter system. NOW; other than brand preference; there really isn't any great compelling reason to get a hasselblad x1d II. If there is a way to economize the manufacturing process..ie less hand build, more machine build, and they found a way to slice $1000 bucks off; they might still have a compelling case.
Yes the announcement of the GFX100S has changed things considerably. While I love the color science and build quality of the X1DII I can’t deny the power and versatility of the 100S especially for the price.
Great video, nice thoughts. Adding landscapes and not zooming in and out on images impatiently, would be nice. Why don't so many presenters give a damn about blocking locals in passageways?
Perhaps you don’t realise your looking at a shot and assuming the space where we are filming. You do realise I was the one shooting there right? And we know the area we are shooting in and made sure there was a pathway for people to walk. This is something that is quite normal here even when shooting tv shows.
I opted for an ex+ used X1D II over the new X2D - saved me $5,000. I also got an 45mm P and a used 3.2 90mm that fulfills 95% of my needs. It is back to the basics with this camera and taking the time to savor it and the images it produces. I know the short coming and limitations, but they also make me slowdown, think, and create. No run and gun or drive-by shooting for me. I enjoy the experience of taking good photographs with this camera. Thanks.
Great review. I have the X1Dii and the 907x and they are amazing cameras. I thought Leica had the best build quality, but Hasselblad puts them to shame. Yes, they're expensive and have their flaws (if you need speed), but if photography is your art and you are inspired by things of beauty, you owe it to yourself to try the Hasselblad system.
Nice work with the review. I've got a Leica S and 3 Hasselblad HC lenses that I use with great results. Every time I see the X1D II, I think I want it. For anyone thinking of getting a Fuji, I believe the X1DII will produce more organic looking images.
Nice presentation, got the X2D and all 3 V lenses, love it. Also love your Panerei, hope you still have it. Cheers
Thanks for Watching!
I’ve always admired this camera. I’ll never own it, but will always admire it.
Yes it’s a beautiful camera to hold and use
The image quality is something else. I wish they had eye AF and IBIS, but I shot a model with this and don't feel I was lacking anything. That 80mm lens is magic. I want one!
Agree. The 80 is special
Great review. Love the X1D II (also the 907 X), the colours and the DR out of this sensor is fantastic! Thanks!
Thanks for watching!
It's nice that the 80 AND the 135 have the same filter size! I love mine. My D850's give me dirty looks these days...
Thank you for the video ! I love the built quality and finish of Hasselblad X1DII. Much better than Fuji cameras.(I have GFX100). Hopefully we can see X1D100C camera in the close future.
BTW it would be nice to comparison video between XCD 80mm F1.9 vs Fuji GF 80mm F1.7.
Thanks! I have a lens comparison video coming out soon
Is this a great camera for other uses. Like street photography, Wedding, etc. I keep hearing it’s only meant for studio do to how slow it is.
Thanks for your enthusiastic review!! love the fact that you’ve mentioned the new grip that was so beautiful on the first version and aligned with the one on the lenses. Hope they will be back on this point (as design is one of their major strenght) on a future iteration that everyone is waiting to compete against the 100s. When are you making a video on image editing as I love the way you process your files!
Thanks Stephan! Yeas I hope they come out with an update as well.
I’m looking into that if people are keen.
i prefer the original image than the edited version. Great review as usual.
Thanks for watching
Hasselblad Number One! I'll buy both X1D2 and 907x
Hard to say no to. Absolutely! The minute I win the lottery I will buy one. I would love to have one.
Lotteries are always good to win 🤣
Good review. The camera have its own market. It is for people who likes cameras and photography. People who is not on a rush. I hope to add the X1D 50C II to my bag soon. Thanks!!!
Thanks for watching
Hey Bobby, would you get the version one since there isn’t much difference between both? Would shooting manually improve the speed of shooting? Thanks
hi, do you think it is the best company when it comes to medium formats? I am for bigger sensors now. but I am new to it. and I wonder If I should wait for another generation of that camera. thank you so much for the review.
Mine's been on order for over a month. I wish that it would arrive.
Yeah there seems to be delays happening. Not sure why
Old Video I know but I'm finally in the position to get into MF digital and I know I'm going the Hasselblad route even if it's a bit more than a GFX50s. I just Love the design of the camera and I have a 500CM so I feel it would be a great pair. I know I want to start off with a 45mm P lens but I'm just on the fence of getting the original or the MKii X1D. I know the difference is marginal with the OLED viewfinder and the larger screen on the back and a bit faster processing but I'm not of course looking at this camera for speed. I've used the original back when it came out and love the files. I can save about 700-1000$ by getting the original one. Would it be better to invest a bit more into a newer version?
Hi Bobby, I have a D850 camera with 4 Nikon lens from wide angle to to the 200mm to 400mm for wildlife. Had a Hasselblad CM 500 in the film days. Great camera, miss it. The Hasselblad was stolen a few years ago. I am interested in both the SL2s and the Hasselblad 907x as a 2nd camera I . As you have used all three camera brands do you think getting a Leica the images would not look much different from the D850? I like the colors coming from the X1D. Medium format is a different camera system so more like apple to oranges. Did you shot it with auto focus off? I am 70years old and hope my eyes could work with this camera. Thank you I like your reviews and your passion...
Hi Ron thanks for the comment.
The 907x is a beautiful camera but not the easiest to use daily. There is no viewfinder and the rear display isn’t the brightest in daylight conditions. In Addition the usability will take some time to get use to.
The Leica SL2S is a nice camera system but you won’t be gaining anything from the D850 except a more refined camera in terms of build and design.
If you like Medium format perhaps look at the fujifilm GFX100S. Fast AF, good ergonomics and very good price considering.
@@TECH360TV Bobby thanks for your reply. I see that you did a review on the on the GFX 100s last week and I see you did a review on the GFX 100s camera so I will watch the review now. Maybe a better choice for me.
Yes, the 907x is a bit impractical but it is a thing of beauty and I’ll never sell mine. I also own both the Fuji 50’s. For me, 50 is enough and I’ve turned down the upgrade to 100MP. You will need to factor in your whole workflow from processor to storage. Will what you have cope? What I think the SL2-S would give you is access to Leica glass, and for me, it’s always about the glass.
Wow, highlight/shadow balance is amazing
Medium format
Appreciate your review. Like your style , no rubbish talk. Straight to the point, with a good number of images. Thanks.
Ok, you've convinced me to patiently way for the either the X2D or the mklll. Just do everything the GFX100s does and keep current body and menu system, possible?
Agreed , just look at what Fiji has achieved with the gfx100s . Hasselblad has to introduce ibis and eye autofocus and better focusing overall in its beautiful form factor
I don’t think IBIS is a critical feature for Hasselblad but, the autofocus, yes, needs improvement.
Hope they do come out with something soon. Hate to see a beautiful camera like the X1D not compete
I can see what you say about the image quality makes you forget about what is lacking in the camera but what it has. That's true for me for the Sigma foveon cameras (DPxMs) despite what the other cameramen say. I wonder if you have tested those notorious cameras.
I have tested the SD Quattro H. I liked a lot about this camera but unfortunately you need a tripod for anything less than optimal light. The ISO usage is very limited.
The image quality is spectacular when you get the right lighting though.
Thanks for a a great review. After seeing your review of this camera, I am also considering buying one.
Your spectacle frame is incredibly nice and I wonder if you can name me that model.
I want to want this camera, but I've pre-order the Fuji GFX 100s. Autofocus, ibis, 100mp, cheaper lenses.... But man, many people talk about the colors and tones being better than the ones you find in Fujis cameras. I wonder if that alone is worth the pain of getting a slow and outdated camera, or just go with Fuji and learn how to massage the images to make them look this good. What's your view?
I think it depends on your use case. I’ve seen images using Pro Negative Hi that come close to the Hasselblad look. Not exact but close.
I filmed this review around the same time of the GFX100S and here are my thoughts.:
The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII
Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile
Battery life was better on the 100
Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing.
Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon
Value: GFX wins.
Menu: Hasselblad wins
Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@TECH360TV I hear you. I guess the solution is a Hasselblad X1D mark iii, or X2D, with faster focus and ibis (if they keep delivering better colors and tones). So what to do... on the meantime I'll get the GFX 100s and most probably will sell it when on Hassy get their shit completely together with this MF camera.
Thanks for your input, I will subscribe gladly
Thanks for the support
A great review as usual! I wish you also used the leaf shutter to your advantage for a couple samples (with flash), but nevertheless I am still drooling over it!
Thanks! Yes wish I could have gone to the studio to shoot with it but wasn’t able to
Is there aViii coming out ?
Great video. Totally convince me of purchasing this combination. And i'm from Singapore too! Just out of curiosity, where i could buy Hasselblad X1D II with 45P and 80 1.9? Please advise. Thanks.
Congratulations!!! you have been selected among my few shortlisted giveaway winners message the above number to claim your prize.
Nice review but WOW on your Triumph! A bike I admired in my youth.
Thank you! Took a while to get it finished but happy with how the bike turned out
Right, let's appreciate that sick motorcycle!
So, question. I own a 907x with both the lenses in your review. While the 45P works well on the 907x, the 907x is a bit limited in portrait mode. One solution is the grip which I feel ruins the aesthetic. Is the X1DII the answer? If you had to chose between the two bodies to use both of these lenses, which would it be.
I'm pretty sure that the answer depends on handheld or tripod. If you do both, then you need both cameras.
I have the Canon R5, but recently I've started to look at the first gen x1d, is it something I would be happy with?
🤔 if I was in your shoes, I would look into the x1d ii. There was a lot of noise about how version 1 felt like an unfinished/rushed product. If you print, I think you would enjoy the system overall vs your Canon. Keep in mind that the AF is a substantial downgrade from an R5.
@@kennethwilliamsinc I still don’t use Eye AF on the R5, feels unnatural. So, I’m a nutshell I’m okay with that.
Low key humble brag on the Triumph =D take my likes
Thanks for the kind words.
Thanks for sharing. I upgraded from the H5D to the X1DII in November and ordered the 45P and the 80 1,9. But both lenses was in backorder and still are..
Yes we are having issues in Singapore. To be honest, no one has the cameras for sale here so it was Hasselblad who sent it to me directly
Nice review but how does it hold up to the new fuji gfx 100s????
I filmed this review around the same time of the GFX100S and here are my thoughts.:
The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII
Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile. Pro Neg Hi seems to close the gap slightly.
Battery life was better on the 100
Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing.
Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon
Value: GFX wins.
Menu: Hasselblad wins
Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@TECH360TV This is so true I mean long as the colors aren’t to far apart then small tweaks can be done in post if necessary at all. Long as the auto focus and ibis works I truly feel like the Fuji GFX100s is the best value overall and now I can afford a medium format camera to get that high end look without doing to much in post. Thanks again for you insight and keep these reviews coming
@@adrianmack9542 thanks for watching
If we are talking internals, then you should compare it to GFX50R - same sensor, same crappy video features and no IBIS:) GFX100s is outperform this beautiful camera
Dude! Can you give me all the information on your bike. I frickin love it.
2018 Triumph Speedmaster. Custom paint, Relic Girder Fork, Hollywood style bars.
That bike is super cool! Honestly really nice. Great review too. I’m moving from a Canon 5D Mk iii. Considering the X1d and the x2d. Any thoughts?
Can you someday maybe cover the Hasselblad xcd 135 f2.8 + 1.7x teleconverter? There is nothing Real World in it at all
That's a dream to have the big one in the little one the little one specifically just for pictures that look amazing like that gorgeous quality I am super impressed I'm set to go to get one love the bud and all the indo 👏👏👏
I'd take this over the GFX any day. Thanks for the great review.
Understand. Thanks for watching!!
Wondering how come?
Omg, after This vídeo o need these! Thanks for share your words about it
Where did you manage to buy it in SG?
I didn’t. This was a review unit but they are now available in SG. DM me on Instagram if you want the contact
I’ve enjoyed mine for like the four sessions outside I’ve gotten to use it during this pandemic. Seeing the new GFX100s, I wonder if I made the right choice. But, I do like some things of the Hassey over Fuji.
I will disagree on the grip though. It ain’t bad, but I don’t like it as much.
The 100S is a much faster camera and the IQ is well. It’s 102MP haha.
The X1D is a beautiful camera, but compared to the 100s it’s showing it’s age tech wise.
I hope Hasselblad comes out with something comparable to the 100S, but who knows.
The 907x is stunning and one of the most beautiful cameras I’ve held. However you need to understand how it shoots and the lack of speed.
To me the 100s is the everyday medium format camera. Fast, small, and versatile. The X1D is the medium format camera that you take out once in a while for special occasions.
@@TECH360TV At least the Hasselblad lenses appear to edge out Fujifilm's (Fuji's lenses are still awesome though). That's primarily the reason I chose Hasselblad.
They are close to be honest. Comparison coming soon
@@TECH360TV I'll be looking forward to it! Consider ad revenue from me guaranteed :P
Hasselblad X1D ii VS Fujifilm GFX 100s?
Hmmm I would have to say 100S
@@TECH360TV I can't make up my mind!!!
Thanks :)
X1D for design but performance 100s all the way
@@TECH360TV Ok, last question: What about image quality between the two? Thanks!
The 100s is better. I do like Hasselblad color science more but for some reason reds can get out of control on the Blad. However skin tones are great and more true to color. Fujifilm you need to tweak a bit.
Have to take in consideration the X1D sensor is a number of years old already so it’s dated.
Great review and also a great choice of motorcycle... 👍
Thanks! 👍
As much as I absoloutely love and adore Hasselblad, you gotta admit, it definitely is overhyped! I just used the Fujifilm GFX100s, it I can honestly say I had a better experience.
Hasselblad is simply playing catch up these days.
I keep hearing good things about the new fuji. The original hassy was a tough pill to swallow.
1100 for a (new) medium format lens doesn't seem too bad.
Hasselblad owner here - I would appreciate specific takes between it and Fuji. The absence can make it come across pretty strongly as sponsored content to me. In any case, still appreciate the video!
Hi. I filmed this video at the same time I had a chance to play with the 100S but due to embargo I was not allowed to compare.
The 100S is blistering fast compared to the X1DII
Hasselblad was more accurate with skin tones when comparing the 100S standard profile
Battery life was better on the 100
Design wise, Hasselblad still has it over the 100S but the gap is closing.
Lens quality is very close. I’ll have a 801.9 vs 1.7 out very soon
Value: GFX wins.
Menu: Hasselblad wins
Overall they are close but I think for the value and tech the 100S is the better buy. Colours can be tweaked, but if you miss shots due to lack of speed then you have no picture to show for it
@@TECH360TV appreciated there for sure. Was thinking more of the heads-up competitors to start, the 50MP Fujis.
@@astrostl understand. It’s hard to get all the cameras together at the same time, but I can tell you this:
Design wise Hasselblad
Color: sometimes Hasselblad sometimes Fujifilm. Hasselblad struggles with reds.
Usability: Fujifilm
Price and ROI: Fujifilm
@@TECH360TV FWIW not expecting to have an actual body-in-hand shootout, just that a verbal mention along those lines would go a long way toward making the videos come across as impartial to me. Only clarifying here, not beating a dead horse. Thanks for the videos!
Is Tewksburyll tre te mktiii
Cool video Bobby.
Thanks!
consumer grade?
why they even have video and mic? like it should be photo only in my opinion, they can add smth more extra for photo instead of video
Can you maybe make a review on the Hasselblad 65mm f2.8? There is nothing om it
Check out my review on the X1D. It’s there
@@TECH360TV thanks! Really an underrated Channel
Can you maybe link me, i found a video from 2018 but the lens was not in that video 🤔
ua-cam.com/video/Lf9Piusa6PA/v-deo.html
You need to stop blocking people at the walkway bob lol. Great review nonetheless.
Haha there was a pathway next to me. She chose not to walk that way.
You should give Fujifilm 100s a chance
Review coming soon :)
Vs A7RIV ?
Hasselblad has better ISO performance I feel and better tonality and colours. AF and speed goes to Sony
Hasselblad is like driving that Porsche 356 or your Triumph ...
After release of GFX100s with 80mm 1.7 it`s literally uncomparable. RIP X1DII:))) I like its design though
It’s going to be interesting to see what Hasselblad comes up with
@@TECH360TV Yeah, that`s for sure. But it would be much expensive anyway))
Oh yeah..gift me that hassleblad with those two lenses..den I would definitely beleive that it's a grt camera ..even for strrets
Haha yes
Is this Stifler's Italian Cousin?
😂😂
While they do have best in class build quality; and they have phenomenal color science (so does Fuji).. but with all of the recent excellent cameras in Full Frame Mirrorless now (Canon R5, Sony A1 for example); and now you have Fuji's GFX 100S at 5999, basically $250 bucks more than this camera and with cheaper lens, but way better performance, I just don't see how Hasselblad can compete. Without the GFX100s; you can see the GFX100 was 10K, and humungous. The GFX 50S was large; more expensive. The GFX 50R was descent size, but didn't look as great, and was not comfortable to grip. While they had some advantages; hasselblad also had advantages that are inherent to the leaf shutter system. NOW; other than brand preference; there really isn't any great compelling reason to get a hasselblad x1d II.
If there is a way to economize the manufacturing process..ie less hand build, more machine build, and they found a way to slice $1000 bucks off; they might still have a compelling case.
Yes the announcement of the GFX100S has changed things considerably. While I love the color science and build quality of the X1DII I can’t deny the power and versatility of the 100S especially for the price.
You mean 80.9? Lens....
Great video, nice thoughts. Adding landscapes and not zooming in and out on images impatiently, would be nice. Why don't so many presenters give a damn about blocking locals in passageways?
Thanks. Actually I wasn’t blocking anyone. There was a large pathway on the side. Unfortunately some just don’t care.
@@TECH360TV Actually, try looking at 6'20 and 8'38 in your video, rather than just assuming...
Perhaps you don’t realise your looking at a shot and assuming the space where we are filming. You do realise I was the one shooting there right? And we know the area we are shooting in and made sure there was a pathway for people to walk. This is something that is quite normal here even when shooting tv shows.
3:30 oh no, dust