Thank you for the excellent comparison Leo. This makes confirms a few things for me: 1. No matter what Zoom does, most people will never be happy or satisfied. 2. IR loading or capabality is what is on the menu now and forever until AI modeling and Cabs come out. 3. I LOVE the innovation that Zoom does with the Multilayer IR - a different approach and an perfect alternative for those who have had enough with playing with computers, menus and dozens of dozens of options. More playing, less fiddling with pedals and computers for me.
I really appreciate that you include the latency in the description and comparisons. Very often it's the hardest spec to find about a unit (manufacturers frequently don't mention it, barely anyone measures it in reviews, and Google needs a LOT of convincing that "latency" and "delay" are not synonyms smh). Running a wireless setup, through a modeler, and into a DAW, it really stacks up, and every millisecond counts! I've been using a G1Xon for a really long time, and although it suffers from electronic fizziness in the top end (which can be fixed with a careful application of EQ), it's been serving me well, but it looks like I might break brand loyalty and go with the NUX when I upgrade. Not just due to the latency - the bigger number of effects slots and the inclusion of bass cabs (I have a "normal" guitar and a bass VI) make it a no brainer. Thank you for your thorough reviews!
You can definitely hear the difference when you're running the zoom, i have to admit i like the NUX sound better compared to the originals, my money is on the NUX. Awesome vid as always Leo, thanks!
You are welcome! Yes...once everything was recorded...I realise that the intro for the "more sound section" was missing...well, a great opportunity for the digital Leo...😀
Hurray for Leo and A.I. Leo working together. This was a great use of technology. Honestly, both of them sound good. The lack of midi is a bit of a deal breaker. I'd go with the mg400, mostly for the screen, but if the zoom was a lot cheaper, I'd have no problem with it.
Hi, thank you so much for sharing your findings!! Yes...I ended the video and I noticed that it was missing an explanation of the tests...a perfect scenario for the digital L.E.O...😀
Hey Leo, I had been watching your NuX videos and I finally pulled the trigger and bought (a used, mint condition) mg-400, got it for $130ish. It's my first ever pedal, I'm so happy with it.
Great review. The Nux wins here - I really don't know what the Zoom design and marketing teams were thinking or expecting...... But for me the big win is any of these new generation modellers at this price point: Helix, Fractal, Kemper and Quad Cortex need to take note (especially as the £1,600 cortex STILL does not have an app or editor for pc ).
If you consider this is a G2 and compare it to previous Zoom G2 pedals then it is an amazing upgrade, but comparing it to other products with price/performance/features in mind then that maybe is where Zoom makes a big mistake.
Maybe tradition is the answer. The Boss ME 80 seems like a dinosaur to me today, but it remains one of the best-selling pedalboards even with prices that are much more up-to-date than its design. But this is common in the guitar world. Just note that this environment is the only one where digital's main goal is to get closer to analogue (which continues to be the reference), instead of bringing things that would have been impossible in the analogue era, as happens in other areas.
Revisiting this shootout. I'm using headphones and... man... The difference in sound quality is so big that I can't even understand why many people has any doubt. The Zoom is way more accurate and natural.
Leo, as you wisely pointed out, in order for the limitations of the Zoom to be seen as acceptable, it would require a sound quality that easily outclassed its rivals in this price class. If all it's doing is matching them tone-wise, I don't think that the USB option is enough to have many choose this unit when its limitations (no IRs, no mics, 1992 graphics) after a month of use will become so apparent and frustrating to live with. A year from now there's going to be a ton of these on Reverb from owners whose honeymoon period ended quickly.
agree ... i think that most of us judge the book by it's cover ... the Zoom looks so much cheaper so must automatically sound less great ... it sounded much better though
My 22 year old Zoom PS02 sounded better than the NUX. It's a recording device with full multi effect unit built in with DNR. I use it regularly for silent practice and writing. It's bulletproof. If I can copy over my settings from the PS02 over to the G2, as a rhythm player, it's worth the price of admission.
I also think the zoom sounded better in this review. I like Nux units too... But somehow, I have the feeling that people is giving them some hype. For me, they don't sound better than Valetons, Hotones, Mooers...
I have noticed something about your playing , when you play the a Les Paul you get more aggressive. It’s like you turn into Slash . You’re playing is always top notch..
wow - i really enjoyed the demo song - rippin solo too !! as always great video , wonderful job of fairly comparing these exciting devices . its a tough call for me as i am a fan of the zoom stuff , my wife has a b1 , b2 , i own a g1on and a g3 , but i also have a nux mg300 and an mg30 .i would agree on the 400 . i would be curious though is the zoom really pulling 500 mah or is that just what the power supply is rated for . like the mg30 is rated at 500mah but it pulls 400 . just a thought . i really like it when a multi can run on just a usb as well . more recently i used the zoom effects manager 2 to remove all the amp sims except the ms1959 and the fender combo , then i filled the rest of the fw memory up with all effects , including about 40 that did not ship with the unit - this is the joy of this amazing software . i made and entire set of new presets , and i will be trying to run the zoom in the effects loop of the mg30 , merging the units to obtain the best of both worlds . i have to see how that works out , but it should be interesting , my only concern is double latency . in the past i have used a mooer ocean machine , running this in stereo paired after the mg30 to enhance the effects capability's . using the tap tempo controller and a wet dry wet rig with an all analog signal path on the dry side , it did sound impressive . i tried using less gain on the dry amp and it really did make me smile , but its also a lot more to lug around and set up .ultimately i did that for one year , the next year i told my wife i am going back to just running one effector thru the pa , she was like smiling . its nice to have options , i think you know exactly what i mean by this , leo . now i want a cyborg version of myself to leave comments on these videos for me while i play guitar !
Hi, interesting points...thank you for sharing! Yes, I know what you mean...you add and add...and finally you start simplifying...😀....Thank you also from the digital L.E.O...👍
The reason the screen is so bad on the zoom is because the device can be bus powered which is huge. It is the only bus powered modeler out there i think. No batteries or outlets. Just connect to my tablet or phone. And I prefer not messing with IRs.
Hi, thank you for sharing! You maybe right, but let me say that if it was the reason why, it's kind of strange that the NUX MG 400 actually needs less power compared to the G2x. In fact, if you watch my video comparison of the NUX MG 400 vs the Zoom G2x four, you can notice that the MG 400 needs 9V at 280 milli Amperes, where the G2x Four needs 9V at 500 milli amperes. Therefore, the Zoom requires more power than the NUX. I think that you can go bus powered even with a colour screen. Nevertheless, it's an interesting discussion thank you!
I guess that Zoom states the 500 mA info based on their power supplies. Zoom doesn't offer a psu below 500 mA. I'm quite sure that the current draw is below 200 mA.
Hi, I'm looking for a multi-effects pedal with an integrated looper that allows me to make my loops by changing presets (clean, distortion) for my overdubs with the addition of bass sound in overdub, and all this during the looper section , I have to be able to switch from a preset with clean sound to a preset with saturated, and vice versa, which of these 2 pedals best meets my needs?
I second that question. If this zoom effect has a similar looper solution as my Zoom g3n then it will be unusable for you, because the looper and the drum machine are just like any other effects attached to particular patches.
Hi Leo, I really like the Zoom G2X for its sounds and Latin Drum beats and 180 sec loop but not sure if I can store and upload wav/mp3 files to or from iPhone or Guitar lab appl.? GE-400 does not offer any Latin Drum Rhythm or Genres but hopefully new software upgrades will have Latin beats per Customer support so I am waiting to test the zoom G2x this Saturday and will update u on my findings, Thx again Sarkis
Hi, unfortunately I have not purchased the app, therefore I'm not sure if you can upload your own IRs...I'm sorry. Yes, please let us not the result of your experimentations! It's gonna be interesting! Thank you!
HI Charles, thank you for your question. Actually, I don't have done a direct comparison between these two units, therefore I can't tell from direct experience. Maybe in the future. Thank you!
Hi, thank you for sharing! It's kind of strange, as if you like the MG 300 you should like the MG 400 even more...would like to share why you didn't like the MG 400? Thanks!
Bonjour. Pour moi le nux sonne mieux .le zoom à une remontée dans les haute frequense .comme le zoom g1xfour par rapport au nux mg 300 . Je l ai es tester et impossible d enlever cette légére dureté dans le haut médium aigu même avec équalisation... c est le son zoom!!! Nux à une bande passante plus régulière ....plus douce et jolie
I want to record the sound of my electric guitar via an Android smartphone, I have a NUX MG400 effect and headphones, do I have to have a soundcard and DIbox?
@@LeoGibsonGtr *Thanks for your reply, for those of us who want to send the L and R signal to the sound console, simultaneously is there any way to send another signal without the cab simulator to a combo without the amp stage?*
Unfortunately I don't know where to buy it in India...I'm sorry. Amazon should be the place...but the unit is quite new, therefore I think it requires some time to be available on Amazon.
@@Stefan- I pointed this out because it was listed as 32bits in the comparison display in this video. I own G6 and MG-30, but MG-30 has better sound quality.
schermo a colori ...ci avete scritto un poema...ma è il suono che conta!!.... lnnanzitutto secondo me lo zoom suona molto meglio,bellissma la dinamica dovuta dalle ir,quando l'ho provato non ci credevo!! Poi cosa importante è che con lo zoom puoi avere 3 preset richiamabili cosa che in nux non hai e che per un utilizzo live è una caratteristiche imprescindibile per suonare , aggiungiamoci il prezzo( ora si trova nuovo abbondantemente sotto i 200 euro)e dello schermo direi che ce ne possiamo pure fregare.Oltretutto l'applicazione per editare su smartphone o tablet coata 80 centesimi !!! Mortificare un gioiellino che suona bene(molto megliodi macchine piu costose)lo trovo assurdo.Per me ha molto meno senso spendere 200 e passa euro per una pedaliera che non posso farci un bank con almeno 3 preset,dal vivo non la puoi usare se.fai canzoni in cui ti servono piu di 2 suoni e questa secondo me è una mancanza ben piu grave che non avere uno schermo a colori!!!
Sometimes i think about, if normal screens are a deal breaker to people that are expecting touch screens, do guitarist even expect touch screens in pedals nowadays?
@@chelososamusic Color screens are pretty much the norm for multieffect pedals these days and i really doubt that the old monochorme displays are even cheaper anymore since color screens are so common. Touch screens are getting more and more common, we have the Boss GX-100, Headrush pedals and the Zoom G11 for example and i would be surpriced if they wouldnt get more common in the following years. Regarding my earlier post i was mostly commenting on the later part of the original post, monochrome display isnt an absolute deal breaker but i think its time to stop using them in these kind of products at least, for simple technical devices where no one cares about the look they may be fine still.
I've tried the Zoom G2/B2 series The amp/cab models are a disappointment I prefer the G1/B1 over the G2/B2 I own the B1-Four for bass, i is excellent I just bought the MG-400, it is far better than the G2-Four The Zoom products do NOT have the processing power to handle cpu heavy fx Most Zoom FX will cause a buffer overrun and max out the chain Poor design with the Zoom units, even the G6/B6 runs out of power MG400 all the way Even better, the MG-40 will slay them all
![[Eng Sub] NUX MG-400 affordable guitar multi-effect pedal](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9NsbdED36_Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Eng Sub] NUX MG-400 affordable guitar multi-effect pedal](/img/tr.png)
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for the excellent comparison Leo. This makes confirms a few things for me: 1. No matter what Zoom does, most people will never be happy or satisfied. 2. IR loading or capabality is what is on the menu now and forever until AI modeling and Cabs come out. 3. I LOVE the innovation that Zoom does with the Multilayer IR - a different approach and an perfect alternative for those who have had enough with playing with computers, menus and dozens of dozens of options. More playing, less fiddling with pedals and computers for me.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
I really appreciate that you include the latency in the description and comparisons. Very often it's the hardest spec to find about a unit (manufacturers frequently don't mention it, barely anyone measures it in reviews, and Google needs a LOT of convincing that "latency" and "delay" are not synonyms smh). Running a wireless setup, through a modeler, and into a DAW, it really stacks up, and every millisecond counts!
I've been using a G1Xon for a really long time, and although it suffers from electronic fizziness in the top end (which can be fixed with a careful application of EQ), it's been serving me well, but it looks like I might break brand loyalty and go with the NUX when I upgrade. Not just due to the latency - the bigger number of effects slots and the inclusion of bass cabs (I have a "normal" guitar and a bass VI) make it a no brainer.
Thank you for your thorough reviews!
You are welcome, I'm happy that you appreciate the info!
Thank you also for sharing your experience and your findings!
You can definitely hear the difference when you're running the zoom, i have to admit i like the NUX sound better compared to the originals, my money is on the NUX. Awesome vid as always Leo, thanks!
You are welcome and I'm happy that you like the video!
Thank you also for sharing your findings!
Woo hoo! Analog and Digital Leo, together at last! 🙂 Great comparison as always, many thanks Leo(s)!
You are welcome! Yes...once everything was recorded...I realise that the intro for the "more sound section" was missing...well, a great opportunity for the digital Leo...😀
I really appreciate the video because it answered my question on which one should I buy. The Nux takes the cake.
Hi, thank you for sharing and I'm really happy to have been of some help!!
Hurray for Leo and A.I. Leo working together. This was a great use of technology.
Honestly, both of them sound good. The lack of midi is a bit of a deal breaker. I'd go with the mg400, mostly for the screen, but if the zoom was a lot cheaper, I'd have no problem with it.
Hi, thank you so much for sharing your findings!! Yes...I ended the video and I noticed that it was missing an explanation of the tests...a perfect scenario for the digital L.E.O...😀
Hey Leo, I had been watching your NuX videos and I finally pulled the trigger and bought (a used, mint condition) mg-400, got it for $130ish. It's my first ever pedal, I'm so happy with it.
Thank you for sharing and If you are happy with your final choice...I'm happy too!!!
Thank you!
Your comparison video format is the best
Thank you so much, I'm really happy that you like these videos!!!
For me NUX MG-400. NUX MG-400 is the best for a budget multi-effect in 2022. Thanks Leo for providing this information video as always!
You are welcome and thank you so much for sharing your opinion!
For me, it's sound. The Nux sounded muddy. Zoom sounded better with more clarity. I still use a Zoom PS02 from the early '00s for practice.
That opening song and solo is absolute fire! Great job as usual
Thank you so much, I'm really happy that you like the music!!!!
Great video as always Leo. Excellent demo song. Agree with all your comments. God bless and rock on 👍😎🎸
Thank you so much...when you like my music...I'm super happy! God bless you too!
Great review.
The Nux wins here - I really don't know what the Zoom design and marketing teams were thinking or expecting......
But for me the big win is any of these new generation modellers at this price point: Helix, Fractal, Kemper and Quad Cortex need to take note (especially as the £1,600 cortex STILL does not have an app or editor for pc ).
Thank you so much!!!
Yes, the budget pedalboards are becoming better and better....
If you consider this is a G2 and compare it to previous Zoom G2 pedals then it is an amazing upgrade, but comparing it to other products with price/performance/features in mind then that maybe is where Zoom makes a big mistake.
Maybe tradition is the answer. The Boss ME 80 seems like a dinosaur to me today, but it remains one of the best-selling pedalboards even with prices that are much more up-to-date than its design. But this is common in the guitar world. Just note that this environment is the only one where digital's main goal is to get closer to analogue (which continues to be the reference), instead of bringing things that would have been impossible in the analogue era, as happens in other areas.
你的公正和渊博深深的影响了效果器测评行业！顶尖水平！
Hi, thank you soooo much for such an amazing compliment!!!
Great comparison, mate. Very precise. Thank you.
You are welcome and I'm really happy that you like the video!!!
Revisiting this shootout. I'm using headphones and... man... The difference in sound quality is so big that I can't even understand why many people has any doubt. The Zoom is way more accurate and natural.
Hi, thank you for sharing your findings!
Hi, thank you for sharing your findings!
mg400 win for me however the zoom can be EQ'ed to taste. nice review as always
Hi, thank you for sharing your findings! I'm happy that you like the video!
Leo, as you wisely pointed out, in order for the limitations of the Zoom to be seen as acceptable, it would require a sound quality that easily outclassed its rivals in this price class. If all it's doing is matching them tone-wise, I don't think that the USB option is enough to have many choose this unit when its limitations (no IRs, no mics, 1992 graphics) after a month of use will become so apparent and frustrating to live with. A year from now there's going to be a ton of these on Reverb from owners whose honeymoon period ended quickly.
Hi, thank you for sharing your findings!
Great review. In my opinion for the same price Nux MG400 wins hands down
Hi, thank you, I'm happy that you like the video! Thank you also for sharing your opinion!
@@LeoGibsonGtr E pra vc qual ganha?
Bought the Zoom. Returned it. Got the NUX mg400. Waaaaaayyyyy better!
Hi, thank you for sharing!
I expected the nux to be better, but why does the zoom unit sound closer to the real amp?
agree ... i think that most of us judge the book by it's cover ... the Zoom looks so much cheaper so must automatically sound less great ... it sounded much better though
My 22 year old Zoom PS02 sounded better than the NUX. It's a recording device with full multi effect unit built in with DNR. I use it regularly for silent practice and writing. It's bulletproof. If I can copy over my settings from the PS02 over to the G2, as a rhythm player, it's worth the price of admission.
I also think the zoom sounded better in this review. I like Nux units too... But somehow, I have the feeling that people is giving them some hype. For me, they don't sound better than Valetons, Hotones, Mooers...
Zoom is perfectly near sounding to real amp. This was the comment that I would like to hear. Nux sounds very artifical for me.
I bought nux mg 400...... absolutely impressive❤❤.. plz compare between mg400 vs zoom z3xn....
Thank you for sharing your final decision!
Unfortunately I don't have the Zoom....I'm sorry...
I have noticed something about your playing , when you play the a Les Paul you get more aggressive. It’s like you turn into Slash . You’re playing is always top notch..
Thank you so much, I'm really happy that you like the playing! Yes, it could be that the LES PAUL inspires me to play more aggressively...Thank you!
wow - i really enjoyed the demo song - rippin solo too !! as always great video , wonderful job of fairly comparing these exciting devices . its a tough call for me as i am a fan of the zoom stuff , my wife has a b1 , b2 , i own a g1on and a g3 , but i also have a nux mg300 and an mg30 .i would agree on the 400 . i would be curious though is the zoom really pulling 500 mah or is that just what the power supply is rated for . like the mg30 is rated at 500mah but it pulls 400 . just a thought . i really like it when a multi can run on just a usb as well . more recently i used the zoom effects manager 2 to remove all the amp sims except the ms1959 and the fender combo , then i filled the rest of the fw memory up with all effects , including about 40 that did not ship with the unit - this is the joy of this amazing software . i made and entire set of new presets , and i will be trying to run the zoom in the effects loop of the mg30 , merging the units to obtain the best of both worlds . i have to see how that works out , but it should be interesting , my only concern is double latency . in the past i have used a mooer ocean machine , running this in stereo paired after the mg30 to enhance the effects capability's . using the tap tempo controller and a wet dry wet rig with an all analog signal path on the dry side , it did sound impressive . i tried using less gain on the dry amp and it really did make me smile , but its also a lot more to lug around and set up .ultimately i did that for one year , the next year i told my wife i am going back to just running one effector thru the pa , she was like smiling . its nice to have options , i think you know exactly what i mean by this , leo . now i want a cyborg version of myself to leave comments on these videos for me while i play guitar !
Hi, interesting points...thank you for sharing! Yes, I know what you mean...you add and add...and finally you start simplifying...😀....Thank you also from the digital L.E.O...👍
Wow the NUX is so much spot-on with their modeling.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
The reason the screen is so bad on the zoom is because the device can be bus powered which is huge. It is the only bus powered modeler out there i think. No batteries or outlets. Just connect to my tablet or phone. And I prefer not messing with IRs.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
You maybe right, but let me say that if it was the reason why, it's kind of strange that the NUX MG 400 actually needs less power compared to the G2x. In fact, if you watch my video comparison of the NUX MG 400 vs the Zoom G2x four, you can notice that the MG 400 needs 9V at 280 milli Amperes, where the G2x Four needs 9V at 500 milli amperes. Therefore, the Zoom requires more power than the NUX. I think that you can go bus powered even with a colour screen.
Nevertheless, it's an interesting discussion thank you!
I guess that Zoom states the 500 mA info based on their power supplies. Zoom doesn't offer a psu below 500 mA. I'm quite sure that the current draw is below 200 mA.
Very good video,thank you👍🏼
You are welcome and I'm happy that you like the video!!!
Sempre nos detalhes, excelente
Thank you so much, I'm really happy that you like the video!!!
Hi, I'm looking for a multi-effects pedal with an integrated looper that allows me to make my loops by changing presets (clean, distortion) for my overdubs with the addition of bass sound in overdub, and all this during the looper section , I have to be able to switch from a preset with clean sound to a preset with saturated, and vice versa, which of these 2 pedals best meets my needs?
I second that question. If this zoom effect has a similar looper solution as my Zoom g3n then it will be unusable for you, because the looper and the drum machine are just like any other effects attached to particular patches.
The NUX is serious value for money.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
combinar zoom con pedales analogos puede ser una buena opción.
Thank you for sharing!
Hi Leo, I really like the Zoom G2X for its sounds and Latin Drum beats and 180 sec loop but not sure if I can store and upload wav/mp3 files to or from iPhone or Guitar lab appl.? GE-400 does not offer any Latin Drum Rhythm or Genres but hopefully new software upgrades will have Latin beats per Customer support so I am waiting to test the zoom G2x this Saturday and will update u on my findings,
Thx again
Sarkis
Hi, unfortunately I have not purchased the app, therefore I'm not sure if you can upload your own IRs...I'm sorry.
Yes, please let us not the result of your experimentations! It's gonna be interesting!
Thank you!
Sounds like Zoom needs to follow up with a G2.1x Four read quick.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
How about their smaller units? What do you prefer Zoom g1x Four or NUX MG300?
HI Charles, thank you for your question. Actually, I don't have done a direct comparison between these two units, therefore I can't tell from direct experience. Maybe in the future.
Thank you!
I have the mg400 but have mixed feelings about it… loved my mg300 more … pitty I sold it :( don’t know what to do further …
Hi, thank you for sharing! It's kind of strange, as if you like the MG 300 you should like the MG 400 even more...would like to share why you didn't like the MG 400?
Thanks!
Bonjour. Pour moi le nux sonne mieux .le zoom à une remontée dans les haute frequense .comme le zoom g1xfour par rapport au nux mg 300 . Je l ai es tester et impossible d enlever cette légére dureté dans le haut médium aigu même avec équalisation... c est le son zoom!!! Nux à une bande passante plus régulière ....plus douce et jolie
Hi Alain, thank you for sharing your experience and your findings!
It is evident that the ZOOM sounds more clear than the NUX which sounds muddier.
Hi, thank you for sharing your findings
You should've used the stock ir's in the mg 400 for a much fair comparison.
Well, it's not my fault if Zoom decided NOT to offer the possibility to load IRs...NUX offers, this possibility...
Hi Leo, I am looking for a multieffects unit with a looper that allows you to save loops. Any suggestions? Thanks!
Hi, you mean save many loops permanently (I mean available also if you shut down the unit), and not just the last one you played?
@@LeoGibsonGtr Yes sir. Exactly.
I want to record the sound of my electric guitar via an Android smartphone, I have a NUX MG400 effect and headphones, do I have to have a soundcard and DIbox?
The Zoom had better note separation on certain licks... but the NUX was closer in other licks...Personal preference I'd say..
Hi, thank you so much for sharing!
Hi Leo i wonder if it is possible to blend same kind of effects such as fuzz and distortion pedal like David Gilmour does ?
Hi, may I ask you what you mean with "blend"?
Thank you!
@@LeoGibsonGtr Mixing.
@@LeoGibsonGtr i mean can i use two overdrive/distortion pedals at the same time ?
*Could you please say if the L and R outputs are balanced?*
Hi, in the comparison chart at 5:55 there is the info you are searching for...
Thanks
@@LeoGibsonGtr *Thanks for your reply, for those of us who want to send the L and R signal to the sound console, simultaneously is there any way to send another signal without the cab simulator to a combo without the amp stage?*
Where can i buy this zoom g2 x four from ?? Amazon??
Hi, may I ask you where you are located? USA or Europe?
Thanks
@@LeoGibsonGtr india..i looked it up on Amazon i can't find it. The Nux 400 is on amazon but no zoom g2 x4
Unfortunately I don't know where to buy it in India...I'm sorry. Amazon should be the place...but the unit is quite new, therefore I think it requires some time to be available on Amazon.
Sweetwater
Nice video! Timestamp is incorrect.
Hi, thank you so much! Time stamp corrected...
Tal ves está sea la última vez que zoom produzca multiefectos para guitarra, todo el mundo quiere los procesadores chinos.
Hi, thank you for sharing! It would be for sure be a pity...I hope Zoom will stay in the market....
nux 400 do they have pitch shifter?
Yeahh
As a Linux user, if the Zoom gets to 95% of the NUX's sound quality, I'll buy it. Zoom ToneLib works on Android and Linux.
Hi, thank you for sharing!
the Zoom sounded better imho
can you help me about (gap) mg400 ?
Hi, I'm sorry, but I did not understand which is the problem
Thanks
Putz! A Zoom oferece menos por mais. A Nux ganhou de lavada!
Hi, thank you for sharing!
I use my ears. Zoom sounded far better and closer to the real amps.
Id still take a Boss Gt1 over both these
😀
ZOOM AD/DA is 24bit
24 bits is more than fine though.
@@Stefan- I pointed this out because it was listed as 32bits in the comparison display in this video.
I own G6 and MG-30, but MG-30 has better sound quality.
@@barubarujp Sure i understood this, any better sound quality on the MG-30 surely isnt due to the 32 bit AD/DA though.
Hi, actually my Mac recognises the Zoom as a 32 bits units, even if in the specs there is written 24 bits.
What are you talking about? Zoom always was 32bit. At least since g3n
E pra vc qual ganha?
I'm sorry but I don't understand
but I choose zoom
Thank you for sharing your final choice!
algorithm boost
Thanks!
schermo a colori ...ci avete scritto un poema...ma è il suono che conta!!.... lnnanzitutto secondo me lo zoom suona molto meglio,bellissma la dinamica dovuta dalle ir,quando l'ho provato non ci credevo!! Poi cosa importante è che con lo zoom puoi avere 3 preset richiamabili cosa che in nux non hai e che per un utilizzo live è una caratteristiche imprescindibile per suonare , aggiungiamoci il prezzo( ora si trova nuovo abbondantemente sotto i 200 euro)e dello schermo direi che ce ne possiamo pure fregare.Oltretutto l'applicazione per editare su smartphone o tablet coata 80 centesimi !!! Mortificare un gioiellino che suona bene(molto megliodi macchine piu costose)lo trovo assurdo.Per me ha molto meno senso spendere 200 e passa euro per una pedaliera che non posso farci un bank con almeno 3 preset,dal vivo non la puoi usare se.fai canzoni in cui ti servono piu di 2 suoni e questa secondo me è una mancanza ben piu grave che non avere uno schermo a colori!!!
Grazie per aver condiviso la tua opinione.
Real amp all day.
Thank you for sharing!
nux mg 30 is better
Hi, thank you for sharing!
MG-40 is better than MG-30
Leo is working for Skynet? Please do not kill all Humans bra
😀😀😀
Hard pass on black and white screen. That's a deal breaker right there. It's the 21st century and you're still using monochrome screens?
Yeah, its time to leave this ancient type of display behind.
Also for me the black and white screen is a pity...
Sometimes i think about, if normal screens are a deal breaker to people that are expecting touch screens, do guitarist even expect touch screens in pedals nowadays?
@@chelososamusic Color screens are pretty much the norm for multieffect pedals these days and i really doubt that the old monochorme displays are even cheaper anymore since color screens are so common. Touch screens are getting more and more common, we have the Boss GX-100, Headrush pedals and the Zoom G11 for example and i would be surpriced if they wouldnt get more common in the following years. Regarding my earlier post i was mostly commenting on the later part of the original post, monochrome display isnt an absolute deal breaker but i think its time to stop using them in these kind of products at least, for simple technical devices where no one cares about the look they may be fine still.
Chip makes sound, not screen
Zoom is so sad now..
Hi, thank you for sharing.
Zoom always disappoint me
Hi, thank you for sharing!
I've tried the Zoom G2/B2 series
The amp/cab models are a disappointment
I prefer the G1/B1 over the G2/B2
I own the B1-Four for bass, i is excellent
I just bought the MG-400, it is far better than the G2-Four
The Zoom products do NOT have the processing power to handle cpu heavy fx
Most Zoom FX will cause a buffer overrun and max out the chain
Poor design with the Zoom units, even the G6/B6 runs out of power
MG400 all the way
Even better, the MG-40 will slay them all
Hi, thank you so much for sharing your experience and your findings!