Mcsqueegy And of course, he's right. I wasn't sure so I watch it in slow motion and it is clear that it bounced twice . I'm 100% sure. So Federer was right!!! Berdych is playing unfair!!!! It's awful. Firstly I thought that maybe Roger wasn't right , but I watched it in speed: 0,25 so veeery slow, and of course I see perfectly it bounced twice!!!!!
@huzzzer and what does that make of you and your presumption that the different reactions were all the same people? You painted a picture of fickle "cowards" and you labeled the crowd as a single entity. Generalizing sides only spoils you and the reality of the moment
"I agree, it was close, but the result was obvious that he didn't hit it the right way." You spend enough time on the internet and examples of disagreeing respectfully become few and far in between. This was a breath of fresh air.
Like when I used the word “inventory” over here in Holland during English class and my Dutch born English teacher crossed it out with a red pen in a test saying “that word doesn’t exist. You made that up”. lol. Pathetic
Right Uppercut bruh I remember this one time I was in year 8 and my teacher asked a question and I answered it right but the teacher said it was wrong 😑
@Enowki Is not even close Federer is way better, there is no way of play more perfectly than that. The only player that is built for beat Federer is Nadal, but is not a better player I general just best fit against him. Left handed, his high bounce on his hits...
Despite the physics degree, the explanation from the commentators is not correct. Federer's intuition that it bounced is correct, but you can get topspin on it before it bounces if the racquet it moving upwards (especially if it hits that part of the frame), or get slice on it after it bounces. The difference is that the ball has far more *speed* if it bounces than if it only hits the racquet. Berdych didn't swing the racquet so there is no way the ball could come at Federer that fast if it didn't bounce. With that shot it likely wouldn't even make it over the net, especially if it had topspin.
@@AGAU1022 One commentator is right the other one doesn't seem to understand. The ball didn't bounce twice, it's on the return that the ball bounces off the wrong side of the court. 0:55 he's right.
See how respectful he was? He knew he was right and the ref made a mistake, yet he was still polite and reasonable and dignified. That is what class looks like.
For those that are wondering, Federer made a comeback and eventually won the match with 3-6 7-5 7-5. Edit: Yes, I finally changed game to match, my bad 🤭
But what the heck is the announcer saying by not a double bounce the ball was hit into the ground 1st that is not what we see on slow Mo even though the other commentator just goes along with his craziness
EXPLANATION FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW WHATS GOING ON: Federer received the last ball in a "top spin" motion. That means the ball is spinning towards federer (from up to down). This move is amazing for making the ball accelerate on the court. The problem is that, in order to do this, the racket must hit the top of the ball to make it spin, so it cannot make the ball move upwards (↑) . If you do this without having vertical force from down, the ball will hit the net. The fact that the ball went across the net in a top spin motion while hitting near the floor means that i had vertical force from elsewhere. Yes, that vertical force is the "bounce" from hitting the floor of the court. Thus the ball DID BOUNCE before or after the hit. It's amazing, however, that Federerer managed to analyze all this in a couple of seconds in a so secure way that he dared to tell to the referee :)
Jesus, Federer is respectful. Not even arguing, just gives his explanation, listens to the Ump, and respects the call even though he knows he's right. That's some class.
I agree he was very respectful in this clip as he has been lately, but if you’re interested, check out “Federer raging moments” and you’ll see he hasnt always been this way lol
@@sarahg6551 The fact that you immediately made this into a gender thing when its not tells me you're not worth debating with. Any gender/race that did what Serena did is equally childish.
It just shows how knowledgeable a professional is at their sport. Took me a minute to realise what he was on about after watching it twice. He knew straight away in a split second that there was something wrong. Science
@@GholaTleilaxu That isn't what he was telling the umpire. He was pointing out the way the ball was spinning (and moving in general) was inconsistent with a ball that was weakly popped up just an inch from the ground, but was very consistent with one that was shorthopped just after it hit the ground. He may be the only one to explain it that way, but literally every single player on the tour (and most in colleges and even high schools...as long as they have been playing for most of their lives) would know it as well. The difference is night and day.
Aldozzy people did complain about it, especially nadal and novak. It's not about the color, some kind of salt that was specifically put on the blue clay make it slippery. Nadal, who i think is a very defensive player, obviously, didnt like that.
@@budgiebreder it is a clay court that's only been used once, but it wasn't made/looked after well. It hasn't been used again after its first appe at the tournament. there's a vid about it
Pay attention their feet and ull see how slippery blue clay is. Clay isnt supposed to be slippery its supposed to help a player to come to stop quickly
Guys, this is not ONLY about the top spin. It's 50% about the way Berdych hit the ball with the racket. Berdych could create top spin hitting the ball from the underside, but in order to do that he would've needed to "hit it the right way", as Federer said. Federer could clearly see that the way Berdych hit the ball wouldn't have caused that result. This is why he immediately knew the ball had hit the floor afterwards.
UA-cam algorithm has always intrigued me.. never googled about tennis, hardly ever talk about tennis, but I’m here watching about how Federer explains about balls bouncing twice. And... I’m glad I watched....
It shows you disposable stuff, mostly crap and TV shows, and buries things that are actually the product of effort, talent or real value. Just for one bit of info, a guy literally invented a working invisibility shield, no BS, and started posting about it last year. His videos have less than a thousand views and the algorithm won't show it. Look up "hyperstealth invisibility."
Reminds me of a documentary I saw a long time ago where they showed how normal people could barely even react to the serves professional make due to the speed. Normal folks only track the ball which, by the time you can react, is already past you. Pros on the the other hand, look at body position, racket angle, jump etc so that they're moving in the right direction/position even before ball leaves the racket. And that's how those crazy fast serves are successfully returned.
old post - but Ill add on that its the same in baseball. A fast ball thats travelling 95mph can get from pitchers mound to home in 0.4 seconds. Human reaction speed varies - but its a .25 seconds. Meaning you need to make a decision in less than .15 second AND act on it in the same time frame.. batters do that all the time. Don't forget too your actual perception is in the past as well, so your brain also tries to predict where the ball "should" be too. Its why sometimes you think you hit something, but you actually barely missed it.
this happens often when an asian student comes to america, then the math teacher suddenly makes every question harder, and the asian student still thinks its easy and points out every mistake the math teacher did lmao
Reminds me of a Kobe Bryant story....he comes out for warmups, eyes the rim from about 50ft away, walks over, takes one jumper from midrange, walks over to the court maintenance guys, says "The rim's about an inch low".....rim was like 9'10&3/4". These guys are ELITE athletes, sure, but they are dialed in to within 2-3 planck lengths. Their perception levels are resting 11.
Fun fact : Federer used to have a terrible attitude when he was younger, breaking rackets and throwing tantrums. I'm so glad that he made an 180 and is now one of the most respected tennis players.
Man was spitting hot fax and realised that putting to much care into it would ruin his gameplay so he just spat the fax and went back to playing. Amazing mentality.
Every one who's been playing tennis (or any ball sport) for more than 15 days is an expert in tennis ball motion dynamics ... If you're not a complete moron. It's not rocket science, just watch what's going on. If your first instinctive reaction just now was : "Well, *I* am not an expert in tennis ball motion dynamics!" (implying that no one can be one) you know you fall in the moron category.
Sahm A Roger was totally right on that one. I slowed down the replay at 0:49 , it hit the ground and Berdych knew that but of course he's going to be a douche and not say anything.
That was one of the classiest moments in sports. You know you've been cheated, there are a hundred cameras proving you've been cheated, but you play on without making a scene or having a tantrum.
@@joshbarrow8928 you say you have a life but not only did you reply to a youtube comment, you replied to a youtube comment within an hour of them commenting it. Some life you have there
Shows how dedicated and professional the man is. He is not just playing tennis on the basis of talent and hard work, he is also fully informed on the technical ins & outs
@Krosis_ Absolutely but the way Federer plays and masters it, there needs to be atleast a smidge more technical awarness and proficency on his part than the others even at that level Because his game depends alot more on his technical abilities than his physical ones unlike for example a DelPotro or Nadal, although as you said they all are extremely knowledgable to get to that level
Not so much. It's just years of daily practice since a child, invariably he's going to understand what the ball is going to do with regards spin/slice etc and know what's possible. It's like saying darts players being brilliant at maths when in reality it's just pattern repetition
Magyar19 This doesn't make him a genius and this isn't why he's the best. he's the best because of how he plays tennis. a lot of people would have picked up on this, particularly pro tennis players.
Bloody hell, I had to watch it on 0.25 speed twice before I could clearly see that the ball bounced twice and Federer knew from the spin of the return- the man’s a genius
He didn't know it from seeing it bounce twice. He knew it from the way the ball was spinning. It really isn't that hard to notice because there is a HUGE difference in popping it up weakly just before it hits the ground, and shorthopping it over. Most people who have played tennis even semi-regularly would see this.
Jay Chung The whole Federer early prime was beating chumps and bums, right up until Nadal came and whipped his ass so bad he had to cry (look up it up there's evidence). Then came Djokovic who started beating them while they were BOTH still in their prime. Please...
Harry Templeman-Wright That's not true, of course prime Federer was beating the Djoker when he just arrived on tour with no expereience. Also he was weak and had breathing problems and in poor health. As soon as he fixed that, Federer was still in his prime and couldn't beat him. Stop it. Plus in 2011 and 2015 he had the most dominant years in the open era, not to mention he did it in an era with 2 of the top 5 players of all time in Federer and Nadal. Did I forget that he was the first player to hold all 4 grand slam titles since Rod Laver in the late 1960's.
Or maybe he knew that a judgement overuling what you saw vs what physics tell you "what probably happened" afterwards is a bad judgement...then again im no regular tennis watcher
He realises arguing with the ref will do his game mentality and focus no good so he tries to keep it to a minimum even though he knows he’s right. Waste no energy on what you can’t change.
I dont think the the ball bounced twice and im sorry all you people and federer talking about how the science of the ball and that it did bounce twice are just ways to make it seem like he was cheated out. Like ya you can have a good feeling of how the ball works but your not a computer that can predict the trajectory, so no I dont believe he is right if you watch the video in 0.25 speed you can clearly see the ball touches the end of the racket and not the ground at all.
You don't need to see it to understand it. It's simply conservation of rotationary motion if you play any ball sport. Federer clearly sliced the ball. That's a fuck ton of spin. Bed bare reached it and was unable to generate power to counter the spin. The question is where did the rotationary momemtum of the ball go? The only explanation in that situation is the ground. Federer didn't "see" that. The umpire was even closer to the action. It's just Federer had a better understanding of rotational motion than the umpire
It was impossible for the umpire to see. The umpire is not a physicist with knowledge of ball spin, energy transference, etc. Berdych likely did not know the ball bounced twice.
I shall agree with Heather, I don't think Berdych was sure about the double bounce... though maybe he should've been after hearing Roger's logic (which is mindblowingly accurate and borderline impossible to discuss).
@@tyroneloki5131 I heard you can’t review footage until after the call is made and refs rarely ever reverse a call even when it’s the wrong one that’s just how it is
@@JonYen69 because it slows down the game in a sport where 2+ hours are the norm and even then is not free from gross error. VAR in football is the biggest example. Regularly consumes about 5 mins of a 90 min game.
@@qiiBlackThunderiip let's just say that things look different from the chair than they do from the court. Is that too hard to understand? Players always have an inflated sense of their ability to officiate. It's a completely different skill set than playing.
Tennis crowds are fucking annoying Djokovic winning: silence His opponent wins a point: goes mental and won't shut up shouting his name so they can't continue
Hard to see unless there's slo-mo! It touches his racquet but immediately bounces onto the ground afterwards. The followthrough brought it back up into the air! Oh well.
*Absolutely true.* Roger played a drop shot with an underspin the only way you can return an underspin is if you hit the ball with either topspin or underspin but berdych visibly just pushed the ball flat with his racket but still the ball made it across and suprisingly with top spin. That would only be possible if the ball is already dead meaning the ball bounced twice making whatever spin on the ball gone.
thanks for clarifying, yet the part where u say the only way to return an underspin is either another underspin (which I can picture happening) or a topspin, which is counter intuitive for a layman such as myself, can u explain? Wouldn't a topspin add more underspin making the ball go down?
In tennis you have to observe how the ball behaves in different scenarios. Like if the ball is hit in a certain way or at a certain angle at a certain force, etc. These players can predict where the ball is going if they can know certain variables, having played tennis all their lives. The camera might not have captured it really well but Federer is clearly right on this one. He knows that if his life counted on it he can bet on it.
@@danialdunson well 1. Player comments can’t influence a ref’s decision, 2. Refs (or just back then) cannot view this footage. Just saying what’s going on. The ref’s job is different to the commentators
@@chili015 I watched it at .25 speed and actually think it bounced twice. See 0:49 Im interested in your thoughts if you try watching it at this speed.
Now thats how you lose gracefully. Federer stated his argument and took the L without any attitude even tho he was right. Class is a rare thing these days but luckily we have Federer representing - a class act. Scored many points with me in that instance. Keep rockin it steady Roger.
Uhhh what? If you're gonna say that, also mention Nadal getting mad at the umpire and yelling "I'm not gonna play anymore!" The bias against Djokovic is fucking unbelievable
form is temporary, class is permanent. Federer despite knowing he was right, did not bother to argue further about the point, nor did he make a fuss about it.
@@momo1461 yes boi U right, I should be sad for you too that you did not get the 'Meme Format' of my comment😑 Anyways, Thnx Mr. Orthographizer (P.S. I guess you you're reaching or have already reached BOOMER AGE😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂)
@eoe123321 Yes sometimes, very rarely you may not feel the double bounce I accept. But this one was way to evident. I play tennis and I can say he should have clearly known.
When you spend enough time playing tennis you know how the ball will react to any given input, and the arc/spin of the ball made no sense given his hit. Berdych knew, but it's not in his interest to admit that and as tobias said it wasn't his decision
Federer said that Berdych was slicing the ball, no way to make it top spinned!! Either "hitting one's own side" or "half volley after a double bounce" makes the top spin, both FOULED. Verbatim: "Did you see that ball bounce towards me...." "Ball can't bounce ... top spin way...it's the only way you can push that down into the court first" "I agree it was close but..the result was obvious he didn't hit it the right way..I might suppose it goes up in the air.."
If I hit the ball while it's bouncing of the floor, L might think I'm Kira, because I'm desperate. If I don't, he will deduct that I'm overcalculating, which means I'm Kira...
0:49 go into .25 speed. You can see the ball bouncing back up then changing its direction slightly with that weird camera angle. It was a double bounce.
From the first angle it looks like it just got caught but the lip of the racket but when it switches you can tell it’s touched the floor, not for long and hardly moves but it touches before the racket hits it
Not familiar with Kollerer...but Berdych hits my radar between this one the Nadal video and of course his famous meltdown in Australia where he refused to shake hands with Almagro because he tried to 'kill' him with the ball...and the Aussies went nuts on Berdych as they do not tolerate that crap. So much so,...they have booed Berdych every appearance since....I love it.
Hakeem Al-Kazak I finally found Kollerer. My God.... He is beyond dicky....his behavior is maniacal. Berdych does not break the rules altogether...he just makes you ill watching him slime-up the rules. Like Nalbandian kicking the line referee...not dicky...just stupid.
If Federer says the ball bounced twice, then the ball bounced twice. Simple.
Zashorigin
Cameras show that Federer is right.
Zashorigin open your eyes and retake a look at the video plz
Mcsqueegy And of course, he's right. I wasn't sure so I watch it in slow motion and it is clear that it bounced twice . I'm 100% sure. So Federer was right!!! Berdych is playing unfair!!!! It's awful. Firstly I thought that maybe Roger wasn't right , but I watched it in speed: 0,25 so veeery slow, and of course I see perfectly it bounced twice!!!!!
Ewa Mewa
But are you really sure?
H4ckRn00B Of course I am :-P :-) Just watch : time: 0.49 , speed: 0,25!
sounds like something they would pull out in some crazy in depth tennis manga or something
Lol
You mean prince of tennis lmao ?
Kuruko no tennisu
I can hear a faint *"NANI?!?"*
John Hang naw fam no one knows any other sport anime other than Raku and Kuroko
0:54 That commentator is spittin rhymes 🔥
Hahaha.... Eminem mode
I cant stop listening now😂
BOUNCE DOWN GROUND
😂😂
TOP 10 RAPPERS EMINEM IS SCARED TO DISS
Federer is such a class act. He has mastered his emotional control more than just about any other athlete.
I love tacos. 🥰 Yummy yummy in my tummy.
It’s even more interesting because he used to be a racket-breaker when he started out playing professionally
Messi 🤝 Federer
He lied in the same situation vs Murray At AO 2014
@@adityadash5142 messi is not federer, he is Nadal ..mind u
He says what he needs to then humbly accepts the decision. It must be the Swiss way.
As a Swiss man, I wish more Swiss people were like this, lol. But we're just as human and fallible as anyone else.
@@MarkHogan994 Can you colonise the whole world please
@@MarkHogan994 😊
@@MarkHogan994 Well, congratulations. You've just proved her point haha. Humble guy.
How is that a good thing? You can't let them push you everytime they make a mistake otherwise they'll get sloppy. He should've insisted
Lmao they first boo him for complaining, then they applaud him for being right.
What a bunch of cowards...
It's called a peanut gallery for a reason.
Most tennis fans tbh
Just the fact of booing, I don’t understand it.
@huzzzer and what does that make of you and your presumption that the different reactions were all the same people? You painted a picture of fickle "cowards" and you labeled the crowd as a single entity. Generalizing sides only spoils you and the reality of the moment
Bored people there.
"I agree, it was close, but the result was obvious that he didn't hit it the right way."
You spend enough time on the internet and examples of disagreeing respectfully become few and far in between.
This was a breath of fresh air.
I'm gonna have to disagree
I DO NOT agree with ANY of the statements made in this comment
@@Blueybeak I DO NOT care
@@jimlahey8210 You saying people often disagree respectfully online? Or meant to say, "I'm gonna have to disagree [a$$ h0le]" 😀
No
When you answer the question that even the teacher got wrong but he doesn't give you the points.
*marks
Like when I used the word “inventory” over here in Holland during English class and my Dutch born English teacher crossed it out with a red pen in a test saying “that word doesn’t exist. You made that up”. lol. Pathetic
Right Uppercut bruh I remember this one time I was in year 8 and my teacher asked a question and I answered it right but the teacher said it was wrong 😑
Right Uppercut my mans never played Minecraft
@@rightuppercut1426 you should've shown him the word from a dictionary.
Roger: The ball bounced twice
VAR💻: He's right!
UA-cam recommendation clearly giving everyone this at once 800 likes in a day haha
J Peps _ hahaha
At once? Still believe in time huh?
@@exerciseaccount3271 go back to your cave
Umpire: Fuck VAR. We're not even as good as FIFA.
Nice to see this is randomly popping up in everyone else's recommendations like 7 years late
Better late than never
Same for me and I don't watch tennis or follow tennis news on UA-cam. Really strange. Bug ?
UA-cam's normal thing at 4am
@@gluekol 2am for me hahaha
That's utube algorithms for u
Federer being the prime example of class in a sport, as always.
tennis isnt a sport
@@LordaLow The Olympics disagree
@@LordaLow what sport do you practice?
@@gnocbuster7886 lmao not soccer you pussy
@@LordaLow yet people wear “tennis” shoes to run in. Think that one through again m8
Rule no.1 in tennis - you don't argue with Federer
@Enowki Is not even close Federer is way better, there is no way of play more perfectly than that. The only player that is built for beat Federer is Nadal, but is not a better player I general just best fit against him. Left handed, his high bounce on his hits...
Sure you can argue with the Fed.... ya not gonna win, but you can still argue.
Enowki especially if you are Djokovich😉
*Since when is dogmatism okay?*
This guy's been in enough matches to see if a ball double bounced with his eyes closed
UA-cam algorithm: I mean you don't really watch tennis...but Wimbledon is on...so eurgh... surprise?
This made me laugh out loud, thank you
I watched the 73 Questions Vogue thing and like all of my recommended is tennis now. And my dumb ass falls for it.
Roger is pissed rn
Did you watch the vogue 73 questions with festered? Maybe that’s it?
At midnight, no less!
"I agree it was close, but the result was obviously he didn't hit it the right way"
Only Federer argues like that with the umpire.
class.
Thats why we all love him
Yes. But how can the referee not notice this. There is no way he can miss that.
Referee has to make a judgement on the spot
you can't say there's no way, the chair umpire DID miss it. Fed explained it to him from an expert player's perspective.
TV commentator with a physics degree: goes on explaining the reasonings
TV commentator with a degree in language: YES
😂😂
Do you expect him to repeat what was already said?
Robbie Koenig the GOAT of tennis commentary
Despite the physics degree, the explanation from the commentators is not correct. Federer's intuition that it bounced is correct, but you can get topspin on it before it bounces if the racquet it moving upwards (especially if it hits that part of the frame), or get slice on it after it bounces. The difference is that the ball has far more *speed* if it bounces than if it only hits the racquet. Berdych didn't swing the racquet so there is no way the ball could come at Federer that fast if it didn't bounce. With that shot it likely wouldn't even make it over the net, especially if it had topspin.
@@AGAU1022 One commentator is right the other one doesn't seem to understand. The ball didn't bounce twice, it's on the return that the ball bounces off the wrong side of the court. 0:55 he's right.
See how respectful he was? He knew he was right and the ref made a mistake, yet he was still polite and reasonable and dignified. That is what class looks like.
Fed exudes class.... Love him
Too bad the whistlers in the crowd aren't as classy
Truly respectfully and destroys the opponent afterwards..
Exactly! He's all class. Total respect for him!
NatureShorts Serena William should take notes
For those that are wondering, Federer made a comeback and eventually won the match with 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Edit: Yes, I finally changed game to match, my bad 🤭
Thank you
He lost the Game but won the Match
Gracias
Godmode
Kiitos
This dude is on a higher level than the rest of us...
Federer says that he is actually to see the ball compress on his strings as he watches the ball onto his racket
But what the heck is the announcer saying by not a double bounce the ball was hit into the ground 1st that is not what we see on slow Mo even though the other commentator just goes along with his craziness
Yeah he's sitting on a chair above ground
Pleb.
Toasted Fan Art Speak for yourself
Wow time passes by so fast, I remembered watching this match with my Father when I was 13. We were both in support of what Federer did here.
EXPLANATION FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW WHATS GOING ON:
Federer received the last ball in a "top spin" motion. That means the ball is spinning towards federer (from up to down). This move is amazing for making the ball accelerate on the court.
The problem is that, in order to do this, the racket must hit the top of the ball to make it spin, so it cannot make the ball move upwards (↑) . If you do this without having vertical force from down, the ball will hit the net.
The fact that the ball went across the net in a top spin motion while hitting near the floor means that i had vertical force from elsewhere. Yes, that vertical force is the "bounce" from hitting the floor of the court. Thus the ball DID BOUNCE before or after the hit.
It's amazing, however, that Federerer managed to analyze all this in a couple of seconds in a so secure way that he dared to tell to the referee :)
Cheers m8 😂👍
@@AlmightyDoor lol, we feel you...
Thank you you feking genius
Technically you could create topspin from the underside of the ball using the rim of the racket with only one bounce
@@dairethornton indeed. Didn't want to get extremely technical tho. It still would mean the bounce happened :P
Jesus, Federer is respectful. Not even arguing, just gives his explanation, listens to the Ump, and respects the call even though he knows he's right.
That's some class.
I agree he was very respectful in this clip as he has been lately, but if you’re interested, check out “Federer raging moments” and you’ll see he hasnt always been this way lol
Unlike Serena, childish and arrogant
@@hifriend7581 Ye
You don't get to the top of a sport like this without having a cool head. As soon as you lose your temper you start to lose focus on the game
@@sarahg6551 The fact that you immediately made this into a gender thing when its not tells me you're not worth debating with. Any gender/race that did what Serena did is equally childish.
When youre so smart that others dont even understand your explanations.... must be frustrating.
It is frustrating.
😏
True
I so agree
It is.
A lot of big brain people in this comment thread, lol. Must have watched a lot of R&M
0:54 1.25x speed for best rap experience
Bro 😂
1,50x better hahaha
😂😂😂
Jaahhajahahahajahhajaha
You're the real MVP
It's pretty nice to see someone not act spoiled or entitled about simple mistakes like that, he was calm and chill about it. Respect.
you’re everywhere
Ok bot
@@harukainuyama5818 ye looking for subs cringe
What do you know you're just some guy without a moustache
Jesus christ why (and how) are you everywhere?
Roger: You know, I’m something of a scientist myself.
Just thought of the meme
Roger:You know,I'm something of a tennis myself.
u will get your points WHEN U FIX THIS DAMN DOOR!!!!
"DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH I'VE SACRIFICED!?" ...
Intelligence is not a privilege, it's a gift. And you use it for the good of mankind.
It just shows how knowledgeable a professional is at their sport. Took me a minute to realise what he was on about after watching it twice. He knew straight away in a split second that there was something wrong. Science
@Aditya Luthra ye which is what I stated in the above comment.
Mad
I think he actually SAW the ball bounce twice.
@@GholaTleilaxu That isn't what he was telling the umpire. He was pointing out the way the ball was spinning (and moving in general) was inconsistent with a ball that was weakly popped up just an inch from the ground, but was very consistent with one that was shorthopped just after it hit the ground.
He may be the only one to explain it that way, but literally every single player on the tour (and most in colleges and even high schools...as long as they have been playing for most of their lives) would know it as well. The difference is night and day.
@@KnickKnack07 Indeed.
2 things in this clip that annoy me:
- The blue clay
- Berdych knew the ball bounced twice, he didnt say a single word. Not cool
What’s wrong with blue clay
Aldozzy people did complain about it, especially nadal and novak. It's not about the color, some kind of salt that was specifically put on the blue clay make it slippery. Nadal, who i think is a very defensive player, obviously, didnt like that.
@@budgiebreder it is a clay court that's only been used once, but it wasn't made/looked after well. It hasn't been used again after its first appe at the tournament. there's a vid about it
@@Aldoz its also been banned after this tournament
Pay attention their feet and ull see how slippery blue clay is. Clay isnt supposed to be slippery its supposed to help a player to come to stop quickly
Guys, this is not ONLY about the top spin. It's 50% about the way Berdych hit the ball with the racket.
Berdych could create top spin hitting the ball from the underside, but in order to do that he would've needed to "hit it the right way", as Federer said.
Federer could clearly see that the way Berdych hit the ball wouldn't have caused that result. This is why he immediately knew the ball had hit the floor afterwards.
Yes everyone knows that
How can you create top spin by hitting it at the angle?
@@MegaTkls you can but not the way Berdych hit the ball.
RF: "The ball bounced twice"
Uploader: "Science!"
mangashu911gt hi
mangashu911gt it was a physically accurate explanation he gave the umpire that proved it. It was science.
@@keithperkins9871 issa joke friend
because you're an idiot that didn't understand his explanation
Yeah mr White ... SCIENCE
federer just owned big time the referee
Federer just owned the referee big time.
LMAO I laughed so hard at this thread
agradina 900th :)
Actually he was wrong, it can have topspin if he on the edge which he managed to do.
Kirk Meyers What? You can clearly see it bounce in the replay.
UA-cam algorithm has always intrigued me.. never googled about tennis, hardly ever talk about tennis, but I’m here watching about how Federer explains about balls bouncing twice. And... I’m glad I watched....
co-sign this
And video is from 2012
UA-cam knows something 🤔😅
It shows you disposable stuff, mostly crap and TV shows, and buries things that are actually the product of effort, talent or real value. Just for one bit of info, a guy literally invented a working invisibility shield, no BS, and started posting about it last year. His videos have less than a thousand views and the algorithm won't show it. Look up "hyperstealth invisibility."
@@EGarrett01 well that just sucks..
Reminds me of a documentary I saw a long time ago where they showed how normal people could barely even react to the serves professional make due to the speed.
Normal folks only track the ball which, by the time you can react, is already past you. Pros on the the other hand, look at body position, racket angle, jump etc so that they're moving in the right direction/position even before ball leaves the racket. And that's how those crazy fast serves are successfully returned.
yes, they can dance!
so u sayin' them pro tennis players are psychics
old post - but Ill add on that its the same in baseball.
A fast ball thats travelling 95mph can get from pitchers mound to home in 0.4 seconds. Human reaction speed varies - but its a .25 seconds. Meaning you need to make a decision in less than .15 second AND act on it in the same time frame.. batters do that all the time. Don't forget too your actual perception is in the past as well, so your brain also tries to predict where the ball "should" be too.
Its why sometimes you think you hit something, but you actually barely missed it.
You know, he's something of a scientist himself.
@JAMF My comment was harmless, yet your words of defiance have incited godly amounts of rage in me.
@@abdulkabir3125 I see...a man of culture! 👌
I understood that reference 😂 (Spiderman 1 by Tobey McGuire)
I missed the part where that's my problem.
@@Gabriel-l What about Berdych? Did you give him a chance? Did you?
roger is a tennis genius
he is THE tennis genius ... he's like the Einstein of tennis !
Michael Senthilnathan this is just common sense.
It's really just experience speaking, maybe to an amateur he might seem like a genius but it's pretty obvious if you play a lot of tennis
St T. - Well - it wasn't obvious to the ump - who, presumably had seen a lot of tennis - and probably even played some... one would hope...
Travis Coates What was pessimistic about it?
when the teacher has a wrong answer but refuse to admit you're right.
hate that shit 💯
Sounds like my old Geo teacher…
relate to this
this happens often when an asian student comes to america, then the math teacher suddenly makes every question harder, and the asian student still thinks its easy and points out every mistake the math teacher did lmao
@@kerohowgee cool
Reminds me of a Kobe Bryant story....he comes out for warmups, eyes the rim from about 50ft away, walks over, takes one jumper from midrange, walks over to the court maintenance guys, says "The rim's about an inch low".....rim was like 9'10&3/4".
These guys are ELITE athletes, sure, but they are dialed in to within 2-3 planck lengths. Their perception levels are resting 11.
fed knew immediately the ball had to bounce twice and it did. I say we let Federer be the umpire..lol.
Could be a possible career for him after he retires.
yungvernables i mean why would he need another job after he retires? he's rich af
ChrisCuber123 I want you to read your comment. and come back...irony is real in your comment.
No need to bicker at each other blatantly. Most retired athletes continue to promote their sport in various ways, not only for monetary gain.
ChrisCuber123 first you said he should still earn more money....and then you said he shouldn't be selfish and take more money
The audience: **booing Federer**
Federer: **explains how and why the ball bounced twice**
The audience: **surprised pikachu face**
This meme is officially dead
It was in Spain and the crowd was mostly Spanish so ofc they were gonna boo him
@@tannerjablowski3192 1.4k likes on his comment say otherwise.
@@aaronm.3581 likes from people who are dead inside don’t count
@@tannerjablowski3192 We can't possibly know if their insides are dead.
Fun fact : Federer used to have a terrible attitude when he was younger, breaking rackets and throwing tantrums. I'm so glad that he made an 180 and is now one of the most respected tennis players.
He is 74 years old. You grow wiser with old age. :D
toptenguy1 i doubt that he is 74 years old. 😁
@@toptenguy1 not me believing that guy was actually 74
@@Reijnz he's 39
Not only is he the most respected, he's arguably the most beloved tennis player ever, possibly sports player ever.
Man was spitting hot fax and realised that putting to much care into it would ruin his gameplay so he just spat the fax and went back to playing. Amazing mentality.
*Opponent:* Addition
*Umpire:* Subtraction
*Federer:* _Multivariable Calculus_
Federer is making graphs on a 3d plane while they're still trying to grasp linear equations.
@@ninetailedfox579121 what an xd comment man
@@flatterswhite so deep
Roger: Expert physicist.
Ref: "When did you become an expert in tennis ball motion dynamics?"
Fed: "5 seconds ago."
:P
Every one who's been playing tennis (or any ball sport) for more than 15 days is an expert in tennis ball motion dynamics ... If you're not a complete moron. It's not rocket science, just watch what's going on.
If your first instinctive reaction just now was : "Well, *I* am not an expert in tennis ball motion dynamics!" (implying that no one can be one) you know you fall in the moron category.
Sahm A Roger was totally right on that one. I slowed down the replay at 0:49 , it hit the ground and Berdych knew that but of course he's going to be a douche and not say anything.
Paul y I never said Roger was wrong lol. I was jut adding the Avengers reference there, if you didn't get it...
Sahm A I didn't know you were paraphrasing. "When did you become an expert in Thermonuclear Astrophysics?" Tony Stark: "Last Night."
if you look closely, britain just voted for brexit
omg! i'm in tears xD
defunctt This is great
defunctt i know this may sound really stupid but i didnt get it? lol
defunctt ?
this is so random
"Well, not a double bounce, but the ball's hit down into the ground" 🗣🔥
Meaning the ball bounced twice on Berdych's side before going over the net. Don't know why the announcer needed to 'correct' him.
no i mean like the way he said it is cold cs it rhymes 😭
This really shows how insightful Federer is in the sport.
well no fucking shit, that's his job and he's one of the top tennis players lol
actually number 1 right now.
Not anymore. Number 2 right now.
Not anymore, he's number 3 right now!
Well ,numbers keep changing but the persona and the charisma doesn't. He is still the best!!
That was one of the classiest moments in sports. You know you've been cheated, there are a hundred cameras proving you've been cheated, but you play on without making a scene or having a tantrum.
and still whoop their ass anyways.
Yeah Moh'd Lahyani is class😉
Ok
he's 3-0 into the set, won everything for 10 years, he's acting perfect so you can buy his wilson racquet
@00justSomeAccount00 Roger's never been treated as unfairly as Serena LOL
0:54 Eminem been real quiet since this 🔥
Lol
hilarious
Way to copy someone else's post. Real original
@@BzKnz220 unlike you i dont scroll through comments reading them just in case i duplicate one. i have a life :) cop on.
@@joshbarrow8928 you say you have a life but not only did you reply to a youtube comment, you replied to a youtube comment within an hour of them commenting it. Some life you have there
Shows how dedicated and professional the man is. He is not just playing tennis on the basis of talent and hard work, he is also fully informed on the technical ins & outs
You can't play tennis at that level without fully understanding the technical ins and outs..
@Krosis_ Absolutely but the way Federer plays and masters it, there needs to be atleast a smidge more technical awarness and proficency on his part than the others even at that level
Because his game depends alot more on his technical abilities than his physical ones unlike for example a DelPotro or Nadal, although as you said they all are extremely knowledgable to get to that level
You don't need all that bs.
You can see it bounce twice clearly
@@shadowstorm5261 easy to see when you have a slowmotion replay, good luck seeing that in real time
Not so much. It's just years of daily practice since a child, invariably he's going to understand what the ball is going to do with regards spin/slice etc and know what's possible. It's like saying darts players being brilliant at maths when in reality it's just pattern repetition
Holy shit, I never even thought about that. Roger is a genius.
Magyar19 that's why he's the GOAT
Magyar19 This doesn't make him a genius and this isn't why he's the best. he's the best because of how he plays tennis.
a lot of people would have picked up on this, particularly pro tennis players.
If you spent day after day thinking about ball spin, you'd probably figure that out, too.
Exactly, if anyone plays tennis all day every day they'd easily pick up on this. You don't need to have any 'intelligence' to see this.
Can someone tell me what Federer said?? I can't understand his explanation because english is not my first language
Federer is so good, he literally educates umpires while crushing opponents lol
he was losing
@@JamboNessy He never lost on blue Clay
P.S. He was 3-0 up
@@utkarshpant5297 and a set down
@@keldsbases and he won the next two sets to win the match. That was his 20th Masters 1000 title. Pipe down.
@@JamboNessy and he won the next two sets to win the match. That was his 20th Masters 1000 title. Pipe down.
Bloody hell, I had to watch it on 0.25 speed twice before I could clearly see that the ball bounced twice and Federer knew from the spin of the return- the man’s a genius
here's a tip: Use the comma (,) and period (.) keys to move forward and backward 1 frame at a time
@@hamyncheesebut most of the people aren't watching this on pc.
@@pulga961 Not my problem. If you want to see the double bounce then use a PC to watch the video. Otherwise, go cry in your android device.
@@hamyncheese I 've seen it on 1x speed.
He didn't know it from seeing it bounce twice. He knew it from the way the ball was spinning. It really isn't that hard to notice because there is a HUGE difference in popping it up weakly just before it hits the ground, and shorthopping it over. Most people who have played tennis even semi-regularly would see this.
Legend of the sport. I only watch occasionally and my love for the sport grew because of this man here.
Federer is truly the greatest of all time.
Novak is good too
Novak is good at beating 30+ year old Federer... Don't get me started on generation useless
Jay Chung The whole Federer early prime was beating chumps and bums, right up until Nadal came and whipped his ass so bad he had to cry (look up it up there's evidence). Then came Djokovic who started beating them while they were BOTH still in their prime. Please...
fed beat djo alot when djo was apparently the best, he only started beating fed when he was really old
Harry Templeman-Wright That's not true, of course prime Federer was beating the Djoker when he just arrived on tour with no expereience. Also he was weak and had breathing problems and in poor health. As soon as he fixed that, Federer was still in his prime and couldn't beat him. Stop it. Plus in 2011 and 2015 he had the most dominant years in the open era, not to mention he did it in an era with 2 of the top 5 players of all time in Federer and Nadal. Did I forget that he was the first player to hold all 4 grand slam titles since Rod Laver in the late 1960's.
Does the umpire not know that Roger has children?
🤣🤣🤣
LisztyLiszt I’m sorry but I don’t get it
😂😂😂😂
@@clotic100 related to miss s williams 😅
Patricks MusicVidz oh
He gave up because he knew what he's saying is too advanced for the umpire lol
Or maybe he knew that a judgement overuling what you saw vs what physics tell you "what probably happened" afterwards is a bad judgement...then again im no regular tennis watcher
He won the game anyways
@@Sepilein1 maybe because it actually bounced twice? Bro
He realises arguing with the ref will do his game mentality and focus no good so he tries to keep it to a minimum even though he knows he’s right. Waste no energy on what you can’t change.
@@MITSJL Exactly even when a ruling is incorrect in like any competition or game ever it's usually better off to drop it and avoid getting tilted
I dont think the the ball bounced twice and im sorry all you people and federer talking about how the science of the ball and that it did bounce twice are just ways to make it seem like he was cheated out. Like ya you can have a good feeling of how the ball works but your not a computer that can predict the trajectory, so no I dont believe he is right if you watch the video in 0.25 speed you can clearly see the ball touches the end of the racket and not the ground at all.
Imagine Troicki in this situation. he would scream: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa and look for camera man to record evidences
King Parodije and he would've insulted the umpire a lot
"WHAT ARE YOU DOING??"
LOL Imagine McEnroe "You CANNOT be serious that was CLEARLY a double bounce... jerk!"
King Parodije wasn’t Troicki actually correct in that one incident where he kept saying “not enough space!”
"DID YOU SEE THE BOAT?!"
0:41 damn he almost set his shoes on fire
Initial D moment
it's clay
@@MrStuffs it was also a joke
@@DarkPlaysThings not everything's a joke
@@redim777 Yes. But the original comment was
RF does not play tennis, "HE IS TENNIS!!".
Atul K RAO Tennis will decide your faith...
I AN TENNIS
RaFa
Atul K RAO nah he is shit
I'd say tennis plays "Roger Federer" ;)
He plays tunnis
In the manga the audience would be the one explaining the phenomena to the reader.
1) It was impossible for umpire to see it in that speed.
2) If Berdych had some fair-play inside himself, he would overrule the call.
151bar151 he doesnt. that why he is going to get trashed in fridays semis
You don't need to see it to understand it. It's simply conservation of rotationary motion if you play any ball sport. Federer clearly sliced the ball. That's a fuck ton of spin. Bed bare reached it and was unable to generate power to counter the spin. The question is where did the rotationary momemtum of the ball go? The only explanation in that situation is the ground. Federer didn't "see" that. The umpire was even closer to the action. It's just Federer had a better understanding of rotational motion than the umpire
151bar151 Except that he cant and he probably didnt even know. It was hard for everyone to see it and you expect him to know?
It was impossible for the umpire to see. The umpire is not a physicist with knowledge of ball spin, energy transference, etc. Berdych likely did not know the ball bounced twice.
I shall agree with Heather, I don't think Berdych was sure about the double bounce... though maybe he should've been after hearing Roger's logic (which is mindblowingly accurate and borderline impossible to discuss).
He even admits it was close rather than yelling and screaming like most. Refs are humans and it’s a millimeters difference. Mistakes happen
The bs part is, they saw the replay yet ampire didn't reverse the call
@@tyroneloki5131 I heard you can’t review footage until after the call is made and refs rarely ever reverse a call even when it’s the wrong one that’s just how it is
@Mister Funk If the ball bounces twice, that's a point-winning shot for someone, isn't it? Your logic is a bit wonky on this.
If mistakes happen why not use the fucken video replay to get this shit right?
@@JonYen69 because it slows down the game in a sport where 2+ hours are the norm and even then is not free from gross error.
VAR in football is the biggest example. Regularly consumes about 5 mins of a 90 min game.
This is why he gets so angry with the umpires at times. He knows the game so well, and how a ball naturally reacts that the umpires just don’t.
I think the umpires should play a tournament every year lol
@@Taigirr yeah, and the players should officiate a match. Both would find it's not so easy.
@@toddrf wrong tbh tennis players would find it easy? Hello what are you smoking on, i need it please
@@qiiBlackThunderiip let's just say that things look different from the chair than they do from the court. Is that too hard to understand? Players always have an inflated sense of their ability to officiate. It's a completely different skill set than playing.
@@toddrf we have iPhones now - the umpire can see everything the viewers and the players can.
Who else is here in 2024 after Jack Draper cheated?
Me!
Federer: Doing his science thing while playing tennis ball
Me: too slow to play tennis, too dumb to understand science
You: too slow to spell and use proper grammar
XxYeet_Master_420xX it was a joke bro also he might not be a native English speaker based on his name
It's probably easier for a pro tennis player the a scientist to tell the kind of spin exerted on a ball.
Swaggy Pea u right my bad
tbh it wasnt science as much as it was tennis knowledge
Game: being played*
Fans: silent*
Tennis player: Talks*
Fans: **High Pitched, anoying whistling**
Tennis crowds are fucking annoying
Djokovic winning: silence
His opponent wins a point: goes mental and won't shut up shouting his name so they can't continue
Tennis fans piss me off
@@JIMP1000 Personally i don't remember a match where the crowd cheered Djokovic entirely...
fans suck.
They're not like this in Wimbledon old boy. 🧐
0:54 Eminem has entered the chat
Underrated comment
Nice.
stolen
Federer truly the GOAT of blue clay
It actually bounced twice...
we see that
Lel no, he hits it before it touches floor
Femeck are you serious or just trolling? xd
Hard to see unless there's slo-mo! It touches his racquet but immediately bounces onto the ground afterwards. The followthrough brought it back up into the air! Oh well.
there is slowmo, just watch it at .25x speed
VAR checks with Roger Federer to see if it's right.
What does VAR stand for? Thanks
@@neznan1706 video assistant referee
@@minedeslebens Thanks :)
And.... The toe was offside!!!😂😂😂
*Absolutely true.* Roger played a drop shot with an underspin the only way you can return an underspin is if you hit the ball with either topspin or underspin but berdych visibly just pushed the ball flat with his racket but still the ball made it across and suprisingly with top spin. That would only be possible if the ball is already dead meaning the ball bounced twice making whatever spin on the ball gone.
thanks for clarifying, yet the part where u say the only way to return an underspin is either another underspin (which I can picture happening) or a topspin, which is counter intuitive for a layman such as myself, can u explain? Wouldn't a topspin add more underspin making the ball go down?
@@desert-igor I guess giving top spin will increase the air pressure downside eventually lifting the ball up across the net.
I see...so that's his technique ... he is truly a worthy opponent ...
Noww i understandd thanks mate
Can you translate this please I don't speak tennis
In tennis you have to observe how the ball behaves in different scenarios. Like if the ball is hit in a certain way or at a certain angle at a certain force, etc. These players can predict where the ball is going if they can know certain variables, having played tennis all their lives. The camera might not have captured it really well but Federer is clearly right on this one. He knows that if his life counted on it he can bet on it.
Fed is the only king of blue clay.
Crowd: **booing**
Federer: “Why are you booing me? I’m right”
@@MrTiti It's a meme.
@@MrTiti Bruh
@@akdreamer6497 i didnt waste my whole life on the net, so i dont know it. but you spent too much time
@@MrTiti You're clearly fun to hang around
@@sauce2514 oh, another internet nerd
**federer explaining what happened*
commentators: yes he’s right that’s why that happened, i saw it aswell and i can say that he is correct
yeerhaaw ref: I’m sorry but I’ve made my decision
They were just explaining what Federer was saying in easier-to-understand terms. What makes you mock the commentators?
@@danialdunson well 1. Player comments can’t influence a ref’s decision, 2. Refs (or just back then) cannot view this footage. Just saying what’s going on. The ref’s job is different to the commentators
The first commentator was actually wrong and the second commentator corrected him.
@@chili015 I watched it at .25 speed and actually think it bounced twice. See 0:49 Im interested in your thoughts if you try watching it at this speed.
Now thats how you lose gracefully. Federer stated his argument and took the L without any attitude even tho he was right. Class is a rare thing these days but luckily we have Federer representing - a class act. Scored many points with me in that instance. Keep rockin it steady Roger.
Hey dude, your class act idol played a double bounce vs Murray in 2014 AO.
Now what? Is he a cheat?
@@hyphorse a year later and I still wanted to make fun of you for what a terrible attempt at trolling this was
@@HistoriesHighlights He did tho, so why cry
Wait...no throwing the racket? No tantrum? No demanding an apology? Serena, did you see this is how it's done?
7 year old video and most of the top comments are from 2 days or less ago... lmao. UA-cam algorithm.
Ryan Jonas including yours
Why is your comment so old??
Don't diss the algo it has showed my stoner ass 66,000 wicked videos I would never have clicked otherwise \(^_^)/
i just realised this is on the blue clay in madrid. lol
Lol just watched a video a few days ago about it
Abraham Guerra the youtube algorithm unites us all
Meaning Roger had the last laugh as the all time undisputed reigning blue clay champ
I thought i was the only one
@@Inbedwhereelese Indeed, same
What's the replay for then? If you have it available in real time: check it to see what happened and make the correct decision!
Maybe the umpire would have seen it better if it was in 1080p
Lol
Reality is the highest definition Genius!
tremellk WOOSH
Umpire may have 1080p but brain only processes half of it
Explained it like a gentleman.
Accepted the decision
Moved on to the next point
Djokovic take note!
Mister Paire take note
and won ;)
Serena Williams would've accused him of racism
8-7 40-15
Uhhh what? If you're gonna say that, also mention Nadal getting mad at the umpire and yelling "I'm not gonna play anymore!" The bias against Djokovic is fucking unbelievable
Federer: "The result was obvious".
In 20 years, Federer will be still right.
form is temporary, class is permanent. Federer despite knowing he was right, did not bother to argue further about the point, nor did he make a fuss about it.
Apart from all physical laws, I actually saw the ball hitting the court.
He protecc
He atacc
But most importantly
He did'nt fight the refree for the ball bouncin bacc
Underrated comment here
@@hesserk thnx bro
What language are you trying to write in?
@@momo1461 hood language boi
Lmfao
@@momo1461 yes boi
U right, I should be sad for you too that you did not get the 'Meme Format' of my comment😑
Anyways,
Thnx Mr. Orthographizer (P.S. I guess you you're reaching or have already reached BOOMER AGE😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂)
I'm sure his opponent knew it bounced twice. He could have been a real man and told the umpire.
I dont think it would change anything though
His opponent is Birbit*h though! You expect this out of him? never going to happen :)
@@vimalvillavan You are not sane, are you?
@ @@Boidmaster25 what makes you question my sanity? I have seen him play so many times and I have seen him play in person as well. Hence my statement.
@eoe123321 Yes sometimes, very rarely you may not feel the double bounce I accept. But this one was way to evident. I play tennis and I can say he should have clearly known.
Poor sportsmanship from Berdych as well? But Roger is the epitome of class in the world of sports.
hard to blame Berdych there. both of them will try to hit the ball best they can. the chair umpire is totally responsible for that.
it was so close he probably couldnt even tell either. ive had that happen to me before and the ball just feels heavy and it really is hard to tell
I'm inclined to think he didn't know. It's probably hard to judge when you're running for a ball, Roger knows because of how it came at him.
its not berdych' decision in the end, and its very very likely he couldnt see it himself. has nothing to do with class or sportsmanship at all
When you spend enough time playing tennis you know how the ball will react to any given input, and the arc/spin of the ball made no sense given his hit. Berdych knew, but it's not in his interest to admit that and as tobias said it wasn't his decision
Federer said that Berdych was slicing the ball, no way to make it top spinned!!
Either "hitting one's own side" or "half volley after a double bounce" makes the top spin, both FOULED.
Verbatim:
"Did you see that ball bounce towards me...."
"Ball can't bounce ... top spin way...it's the only way you can push that down into the court first"
"I agree it was close but..the result was obvious he didn't hit it the right way..I might suppose it goes up in the air.."
Gene Yang thank you! I couldn't hear his explanation.
UA-cam at 3am: wanna watch some crazy tennis science ?
Me: HELL YEAH!
If I hit the ball while it's bouncing of the floor, L might think I'm Kira, because I'm desperate. If I don't, he will deduct that I'm overcalculating, which means I'm Kira...
Imagine if the ref had said, "That's a good explanation, Fed. You got a point there."
This is how you challenge the referee.
And not shout 'Are you doing this to me just because I am a man?!'
The algorithm is definitely trying to slam an extra nail into Serena's coffin lol
Get a life. Stop copying comments all day!
@@Fischjesicht Shut up
It isn’t even a copied comment 😂
@@ricardoestevez4976 there are people literally making jokes about fucking youtube algorithm all day.
How is that shit even funny after reading it the 568th time this year.
Fun fact: Roger used to be a ball boy in Basel so he knows what he's talking about.
He's also been a professional tennis player for like 20 years, so there's that.
0:49 go into .25 speed. You can see the ball bouncing back up then changing its direction slightly with that weird camera angle. It was a double bounce.
I tried to watch at normal speed and I couldn't tell.slow mo was required.
the topspin is enough of a tell
you can actually cycle through frame by frame with , and .
From the first angle it looks like it just got caught but the lip of the racket but when it switches you can tell it’s touched the floor, not for long and hardly moves but it touches before the racket hits it
It wasn't a double bounce. He hit the ball before 2nd bounce but he hit it into the ground and then he hit it again over the net.
Federer>Neil Degrasse Tyson
Sami bayeh im here, hello
Interesting that Berdych is involved in so many 'dick' plays. No other player can match him in that category.
Naw, that title probably belongs to Daniel Köllerer. Good player too, just has a bad attitude.
Not familiar with Kollerer...but Berdych hits my radar between this one the Nadal video and of course his famous meltdown in Australia where he refused to shake hands with Almagro because he tried to 'kill' him with the ball...and the Aussies went nuts on Berdych as they do not tolerate that crap. So much so,...they have booed Berdych every appearance since....I love it.
Mark Smith well Kollerer is the only ATP player to be banned for life for non-drug related incidents, look him up you'll get some good laughs :p
Hakeem Al-Kazak
I finally found Kollerer. My God.... He is beyond dicky....his behavior is maniacal. Berdych does not break the rules altogether...he just makes you ill watching him slime-up the rules. Like Nalbandian kicking the line referee...not dicky...just stupid.
As a Czech I need to agree that he is a total douchebag...
Love how he points it out, is right about it but doesn't keep complaining about it.
True professional!👍
Roger at 0:35 was like "uff such an idiot"
1xXxIceGirlxXx1 ahhaha O thought the same..
"I agree it was close but..." haha such an nice way of telling off the ump lol
1xXxIceGirlxXx1 iii
Yes, i thought the same