Superbet Chess Classic 2024: Round 5 |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Live from the Grand Hotel Bucharest, the 5th Superbet Chess Classic is the second of five legs of the Grand Chess Tour. The nine Tour players are joined by a wildcard (pairings below) for a classical round robin. Join GMs Yasser Seirawan, Evgeny Miroshnichenko, & Cristian Chirila, IM Jovanka Houska, and WGM Anastasiya Karlovich for the move-by-move.
2024.06.30
GrandChessTour...
/ grandchesstour
/ stlchessclub
/ grandchesstourofficial
/ grandchesstour
ROUND 5
| 120 Min. Incr. 30 Sec.
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (2) vs. Fabiano Caruana
(3)
Wesley So
(2) vs. Praggnanandhaa R (2.5)
Gukesh D (2.5) vs. Nodirbek Abdusattorov (1.5)
Anish Giri (1.5) vs. Alireza Firouzja (2)
Bogdan Deac (1) vs. Ian Nepomniachtchi (2)
Good commentary. All three are precious
can agree more
draw tournament
Giving them more time just gives them more time to find a draw.
It would be amazing if there will be only all draws for the remaining 4 rounds. Anish would love it.
Chat needs a moderator
young chess at it's worst
Hi
kpNov23: True.
I wonder how long classical chess can survive with a vast majority of draws between players who prepare 20 moves deep ?
The tate's were here in the back
59:21 why is it bad for black to capture the rook on e5?
finally chess tournament without stupid womens chess.
Real talk bro, it's insane how much that sht gets pushed
@@tristan7720insecure?
Could you elaborate? Why do you think that womens' chess is stupid?
@@JohnSmithEx
Women can play in open, so they are privileged to have a section for themselves. They play on a low GM level and get the same screentime and money as some super GMs, it's fkn outrageous.
Imagine you are 2700 in rating which is insanely good but you get less invitations than some 2400-2550 players just because they are women.
It's crazy that you even ask about that.
@@tristan7720 please stay focused. I asked the OP why they think that women's chess is stupid. I didn't ask them why they think that the women's chess is overrated or unfairly prized, because they didn't claim that. If you want to defend the OP's position, you should defend their claim as is. Their claim is that women's chess is stupid. Do you agree with this claim, and if yes why?
Btw I completely agree that women-only tournaments should have lower prizes than open tournaments. But I refuse to start a discussion about it under a comment that claims that "women's chess is stupid". Personally I completely disagree that women's chess is stupid. If someone claims that, I want to know exactly what they mean, and their reasoning.
Third Comment