@@JohnSmithEx Women can play in open, so they are privileged to have a section for themselves. They play on a low GM level and get the same screentime and money as some super GMs, it's fkn outrageous. Imagine you are 2700 in rating which is insanely good but you get less invitations than some 2400-2550 players just because they are women. It's crazy that you even ask about that.
@@tristan7720 please stay focused. I asked the OP why they think that women's chess is stupid. I didn't ask them why they think that the women's chess is overrated or unfairly prized, because they didn't claim that. If you want to defend the OP's position, you should defend their claim as is. Their claim is that women's chess is stupid. Do you agree with this claim, and if yes why? Btw I completely agree that women-only tournaments should have lower prizes than open tournaments. But I refuse to start a discussion about it under a comment that claims that "women's chess is stupid". Personally I completely disagree that women's chess is stupid. If someone claims that, I want to know exactly what they mean, and their reasoning.
Good commentary. All three are precious
can agree more
It would be amazing if there will be only all draws for the remaining 4 rounds. Anish would love it.
I wonder how long classical chess can survive with a vast majority of draws between players who prepare 20 moves deep ?
59:21 why is it bad for black to capture the rook on e5?
kpNov23: True.
Chat needs a moderator
young chess at it's worst
The tate's were here in the back
Hi
Giving them more time just gives them more time to find a draw.
draw tournament
Third Comment
finally chess tournament without stupid womens chess.
Real talk bro, it's insane how much that sht gets pushed
@@tristan7720insecure?
Could you elaborate? Why do you think that womens' chess is stupid?
@@JohnSmithEx
Women can play in open, so they are privileged to have a section for themselves. They play on a low GM level and get the same screentime and money as some super GMs, it's fkn outrageous.
Imagine you are 2700 in rating which is insanely good but you get less invitations than some 2400-2550 players just because they are women.
It's crazy that you even ask about that.
@@tristan7720 please stay focused. I asked the OP why they think that women's chess is stupid. I didn't ask them why they think that the women's chess is overrated or unfairly prized, because they didn't claim that. If you want to defend the OP's position, you should defend their claim as is. Their claim is that women's chess is stupid. Do you agree with this claim, and if yes why?
Btw I completely agree that women-only tournaments should have lower prizes than open tournaments. But I refuse to start a discussion about it under a comment that claims that "women's chess is stupid". Personally I completely disagree that women's chess is stupid. If someone claims that, I want to know exactly what they mean, and their reasoning.