I honestly think that if you take just couple of times the desired profit you would have a whole another bankroll to play with so you could do with those low probabilites actually happening and wiping your bankroll, and still being good long term if you take into consideration where you started
I think the missing piece is the best selection, if you’re not using statistics to place bets it’s just a close your eyes and pray approach which inevitably will involve emotions and mistakes to be made.
Play with any 1:1 bet, considering the progression 2, 3, 4, 6, etc. Basically doubling with respect to the previous tier, after hitting or at every three consecutive losses in a row. Cut in half after securing two hits in a row. This is the approach i would follow for Even money bets.
@@CasinoMatchmaker To make it easier, pick Red and do not consider the middle column Red numbers as winners, so you expect to hit twice on the remaining 14 reds. After securing two hits in a row on those, you can halve you bet or regress to the base bet, if you are risk adverse.
I've done well with this but only when I'm lucky, I've 10-15-20-25 of the same colour come in when your lucks just not in🤷 with larger bank you could do all the 50/50 bets
its great that you can withstand a single losing streak of 7-8 in a row, but sadly that is not how this system works, its not a martingale system where as long as you survive, you're left with what you had or more. if you lose 6 in a row, your bankroll is still seriously depleted and you need to get a on a streak to survive. therefore 300 is not enough.
You are right, if you hit a losing streak of 8 in a row you won't be in profit, unlike you would be with the martingale. However you have much more safety, as you'll probably get wiped out completely after 8 losses when doing the Martingale
@@CasinoMatchmaker if you lose 6 in a row with this system starting at 30, and then win, you'll be down 195 of your 300 and betting 55. so basically down to two bets. I'm just saying that 300 isn't enough of a starting bankroll. Realistically you probably still want like 1000 to help get through times where the wheel is unkind.
I lost your email, could you post it again? I have the dumbest system ever at wins. I want to send it to you to take a look at and it and see what you think
Interesting Matchmaker - thx for your hard work creating this informative video. I’m going trial this on a simulator and see if I’d suggest any tweaks.
You bet 25 and lose 25 Then you bet 20 because you lose then win by 20 How can you catch up your loss with that strategy? The only advantage is when there's winning streak
@@CasinoMatchmaker each individual spin is its own event. nothing changes per spin. therefore, there’s a 48.6% chance that, when betting on an evens chance bet, you will win. it doesn’t matter if it’s been red 5 times in a row, i’ve seen it go to 19 times in a row. i’m just saying it is misleading when you give out statistics in that aspect
@HarrisonWilliams-iv3fd He's not saying that on the 5th spin there is a swayed probability, he's saying that, that is the probably for something that happens 48.6% of the time to happen 5 times in a row
That's called the gamblers fallacy and roulette professional does a very interesting video on it I'll leave the link here and let you decide it it's true or not ua-cam.com/video/oioOoATeYq4/v-deo.htmlsi=2oWM8Xcaxsx314TQ
Exactly, perfectly sensible to judge the size of your bets and bankroll based on statistical chance of having 8 consecutive losing bets. No one is suggesting this effects the odds of the next spin.
There is no single strategy that allows you to consistently win at roulette. Don't waste your time. I have tried many strategies. At one point or another, the table will still play against you. Don't believe any videos that show you how to get rich easily in roulette. You might as well flush your money down the toilet 😂
Find your perfect Casino: casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/
I think this strategy will work on follow the winner strategy, you can take tha advantage of the winning streak of both color
I honestly think that if you take just couple of times the desired profit you would have a whole another bankroll to play with so you could do with those low probabilites actually happening and wiping your bankroll, and still being good long term if you take into consideration where you started
I think the missing piece is the best selection, if you’re not using statistics to place bets it’s just a close your eyes and pray approach which inevitably will involve emotions and mistakes to be made.
Play with any 1:1 bet, considering the progression 2, 3, 4, 6, etc. Basically doubling with respect to the previous tier, after hitting or at every three consecutive losses in a row. Cut in half after securing two hits in a row. This is the approach i would follow for Even money bets.
Does this system have a name?
Are you in the discord? Can you come and explain it in more detail to us please?
@@CasinoMatchmaker To make it easier, pick Red and do not consider the middle column Red numbers as winners, so you expect to hit twice on the remaining 14 reds. After securing two hits in a row on those, you can halve you bet or regress to the base bet, if you are risk adverse.
So upon a hit on the 4 red numbers to disregard, you don't change your bet for the next spin.
I've done well with this but only when I'm lucky, I've 10-15-20-25 of the same colour come in when your lucks just not in🤷 with larger bank you could do all the 50/50 bets
Great way to test progression is find online roulette with 0.50 min bet and scale up start $5 bet.
These videos are so helpful.
Another great video. Thanks!
The probabilities ALWAYS work out the way they should, in the long run, and the casino always wins.
I read about another betting system called Hollandish or Dutch. Do you think it is better than the system in this video?
don't understand what are you talking, pls do a demo on real table and explain it.
Thought I’d try this out. Lost the 1st 10 in a row. Bust…
Oh crap that is not fun!
Try follow the winner strategy, you can take advantage the winning streak
Just bad luck
its great that you can withstand a single losing streak of 7-8 in a row, but sadly that is not how this system works, its not a martingale system where as long as you survive, you're left with what you had or more. if you lose 6 in a row, your bankroll is still seriously depleted and you need to get a on a streak to survive. therefore 300 is not enough.
You are right, if you hit a losing streak of 8 in a row you won't be in profit, unlike you would be with the martingale.
However you have much more safety, as you'll probably get wiped out completely after 8 losses when doing the Martingale
@@CasinoMatchmaker if you lose 6 in a row with this system starting at 30, and then win, you'll be down 195 of your 300 and betting 55. so basically down to two bets. I'm just saying that 300 isn't enough of a starting bankroll. Realistically you probably still want like 1000 to help get through times where the wheel is unkind.
appreciated your work ❤
I will try this system on blackjack 👍
Yes it's a good one for Blackjack as well !
I lost your email, could you post it again? I have the dumbest system ever at wins. I want to send it to you to take a look at and it and see what you think
If 1st bet of 30 wins, I win 60, so would I decrease bet to 55 or base it on the original bet of 30 and decrease bet to 25?
Decrease the bet down to 25
Hi, if i play 02 dozens each, win rate is about 65%, max losses up to 8. What strategy should I use: Dalembert or Oscar grind? Pls advice.
Oscars Grind is a favourite of mine.
If you like playing 2 dozens.. Check this out..ua-cam.com/video/dJJy0TQjqRo/v-deo.html
Interesting Matchmaker - thx for your hard work creating this informative video. I’m going trial this on a simulator and see if I’d suggest any tweaks.
any updates?
You bet 25 and lose 25
Then you bet 20 because you lose then win by 20
How can you catch up your loss with that strategy? The only advantage is when there's winning streak
You go the other way.
If you lost 25, then you go to 30 👍
End result zero
each individual event does not affect future events. therefore, giving statistics on losing 5+ times in a row is meaningless.
What's the probability of losing 5 bets in a row?
@@CasinoMatchmaker each individual spin is its own event. nothing changes per spin. therefore, there’s a 48.6% chance that, when betting on an evens chance bet, you will win. it doesn’t matter if it’s been red 5 times in a row, i’ve seen it go to 19 times in a row. i’m just saying it is misleading when you give out statistics in that aspect
@HarrisonWilliams-iv3fd
He's not saying that on the 5th spin there is a swayed probability, he's saying that, that is the probably for something that happens 48.6% of the time to happen 5 times in a row
That's called the gamblers fallacy and roulette professional does a very interesting video on it I'll leave the link here and let you decide it it's true or not
ua-cam.com/video/oioOoATeYq4/v-deo.htmlsi=2oWM8Xcaxsx314TQ
Exactly, perfectly sensible to judge the size of your bets and bankroll based on statistical chance of having 8 consecutive losing bets. No one is suggesting this effects the odds of the next spin.
Third
First
Second
🥈
Ich habe auch einen UA-cam Kanal 🎉
System roulate fake game
bro atleast complete third day giveaway.
Yep. Talk about consistency ... unsubscribed.
I've been sick and recorded this video a while ago.
But if you're just here for the free money... Cyaaaa!
its not free money... im giving my time ..efforts and views @@CasinoMatchmaker
There is no single strategy that allows you to consistently win at roulette. Don't waste your time. I have tried many strategies. At one point or another, the table will still play against you. Don't believe any videos that show you how to get rich easily in roulette. You might as well flush your money down the toilet 😂