The Real Reasons why Images from Space Look Fake.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 сер 2020
- Dear World,
It is easy to tell if something looks fake, isn´t it? Our eyes are very good in noticing if something does not look right. But what makes something look fake anyway? Sometimes it is hard to tell.
Like professional magicians are best in debunking tricksters, people who create artificial images know best how to spot fake images. But they also realize that a fake looking image can be very real, if there is just no other way it could look like.
If you want to support the channel, please consider joining my supporters on Patreon
to get some background info and other goodies:
Starts with 1$ :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
/ morn1415
----------------------------------------------------------------
Other social Media:
/ morn1415
/ morn1415
/ morn1415
Music:
"Drops of H2O ( The Filtered Water Treatment )" by J.Lang
2012 - Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (3.0)
ccmixter.org/files/djlang59/37792
"Improvisation On Friday..." by Alex
2008 - Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (3.0)
ccmixter.org/files/AlexBeroza/...
Outro Music:
"Bush Week" by "Nihilore"
is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence
/ bush-week
• Video - Наука та технологія
This is precisely how a flat earther would reactw
Had a lot of those conversations. ;)
@@morn1415 u
Can't have any conversations now, flat earthers are banned, kinda wonder why
@@gordomills5079 cause it’s flat. I worked at JPL as an intern, if the scientist and astronaughts were joking every time they illuded to it being flat than they all have extremely dry humor.
@@Ryan-fosho You’re not being serious are you? If you’re actually a flat Earther please go and find a high building, we really don’t need anymore absolute moronic idiots on the planet.
Ask "Well, what's it supposed to look like?" Crickets.....
"Hey, that picture of big foot looks fake"
You: "Oh yeah? What's bigfoot supposed to look like then?"
@@sarahcusack No sense. The Bigfoot photo ARE real. Someone actually took those photo and released them.
What is fake about Bigfoot is his existence.
@@FunkyRezable Of course the images themselves exist...that's not what we're talking about. The argument is whether they are actually valid photos of bigfoot or not.
This channel is severely underrated..
Agree
chatur 1889 ikr
@@rev_5728 🤬
@@beluwuga2229 🤬
Agreed
0:21 That picture of Jupiter is a composite. It's pictures taken by Cassini mapped onto a sphere. Jupiter is slightly oblate. If you look closely, you can see where the 3D model's UVs are.
Checked. Yes, as seems they mapped 4 photos onto a sphere. Unable to see the UVs still, but maybe I have to get a higher resolution.
@@morn1415 tdfrcgrddycerdcsttrcsdscdr 👁️👄👁️
So even with 90 billion dollar spare change they can't send a craft to these bodies, record some video and then swing back?
I guess what annoys people though is that the images are extremely inaccurate. We don't want Mars to look like Earth want want it to look like Mars.
After this we can build a very realistic simulator.
Dear morn-четырнадцать-пятнадцать, I told you earlier, I repeat again. I love the way you speak English. The sounds of your voice, your manner, an accent - are very nice to my ears. I'm from snowy Russia, from the Soviet Motheяland, and we like your speach together with Lenin. And there isn't any connection to Kermit, while you talk back.
Keep that line, tovarisch.
Спасибо!
Well, morn's English is far from idiomatic. For instance, no native speaker would say "what are the features to make you say" ("features that make you" would be the standard locution). As far as enjoyment of his excellent videos goes, it does not matter at all - we understand what he is trying to say, but if you wish to learn idiomatic English, you do need to focus on native speakers.
I am responding because you are not the first speaker of a slavic language to prefer poor English over the real thing. I do understand the sentiment - the rhythms and turns of phrase may seem more familiar or accessible. But how would you feel if I preferred defective Russian over true Russian?
@@DrWhom He never said he wanted to learn proper English with my speech.
If your aim was to understand the content of a Russian Speech, you would prefer "defective" Russian too. And I guess he would not be angry about that.
(Now imagine the series of Terminator movies with Arnold speaking proper Oxford English for fun.)
Hey man I'm looking to start a career in astrophysics so can u pls recommend any books or topics i should study? Thanks
Edit-stupid autocorrect. I'm not starting a career. I'm a 13 year old who is just interested
Autocorrect doesn't write sentences itself lol
@@Vindicator7475 ik but i misread the recommended words on top
Have you checked out a Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking already?
The recent Books by Neil deGrasse Tyson are good starters probably.
@@morn1415 ok I'll be sur to check them out. Thank you!
@@kirkhamandy thnx!
This is an example of what flerfettes should, think through what you're seeing before you speak. Great vid!!
that iamsosmrt3 guy should have typed "tha emejes ar feyk! Dued, eye ken eezili pain tham en fotoshap!
Dang! Excuse the proper spelling. ;)
@@morn1415 🤣
LMFAOAOAOOOAOAAAAA THATCWAS ACTUALLY RLLG FUNNY😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
People are getting dumber by the day. Must be something in the water.
People say dumb things because it makes them feel smart, and they often feel like they become part of a community by doing so. They don't care about the real world or knowledge, they only care about themselves.
And really, quite often it's actually hard to blame them, because too many people are treated like shit, expected to know stuff without taking the time to learn them. If you aren't raised in a safe environment, if you aren't taught a sense of the importance of scientific method and critical judgment, those are things that are extremely hard to acquire.
If we treat people better (so they don't struggle to survive or to form their opinions without being hurt), if knowledge and experimentation are easily accessible (that means not being told "you're not very smart and you can't handle complex things"), then dumb people will disappear.
I think it is because of being interconnected. Any person who has any crazy idea on the planet will find the few others who have the same. The more people there are celebrating this wrong idea, the more people will be convinced there is something to it. That´s why it is important to learn how to evaluate information. Should be an important part of education. Not specific information. Just how to think in a rational way. Children are natural scientists, but often the environment makes them ignorant.
@@morn1415 totally agreed. We shouldn't fall victim to peer pressure, but keep our viewpoints as long as we think they make sense to us.
Napishtim Most of those people who treat people (who still have alot to learn) like sh*t are mostly teenagers like middle or high school students. In middle or high school theres always these annoying students who expects you to know alot and yet when you say you don’t or say the wrong answer to one question in class, they always go “Hahahahah StOoPpID!” or “Hahahaha he/she DuMnB!” Instead being aware of the fact there’s people who didn’t aquaired as much information as they did and needed the time to be tought about it and just move on.
As always ... thx and good work!
"also you do raytracing. How about showing how light bounces in a simple scene? Maybe showing how we now have GI etc, and that raytracing acts like the reverse of the eye?"
Wrote that in comment to your previous upload last week. So was delighted to see exactly this in todays upload. 😁
Another great explanatory video. So important in todays world of conspiracy theorist and peddlers of fake and misleading information. Thank you. 😊
Good video.
But, I think there is another aspect to this and that is a person's understanding of the physical world and what they are looking at in an image. Photos of celestial objects and videos of activities on the ISS or other spacecraft have never looked fake to me because I understood what I was looking at and why it looked the way it did, but, CGI, even as good as it is today, still looks fake to me to at least some degree. For the most part I can ignore it and enjoy the movie or TV show, but, the second the thought that it's CGI enters my head I have to pause and get that thought out my head or I won't be able to continue watching.
Excellent run down and visuals. I think it is a feature of flat eartthers and science-deniers that they try to relate everything to their own little parochial space. So, if it's unfamiliar to their everyday experience it is by definition "fake". The simplistic term for it is "small minded". They can't handle the size, complexity and beauty of the universe sometimes because it conflicts with their religious belief/teachings and being presented with it makes them feel small and insignificant. I feel sorry for them - some of the time - when I'm not laughing at them! Life is cruel.
Thanks, your explanation is great as always.
People claim to be intelligent but they never consider the countless other possibilities. then they call people stupid for being free thinkers, the human mind is meant to think outside the box. Sad part about it is that free thinking is taboo nowadays. The average person would rather have a machine think for them.
such a great tutorial, thank you!!
Hey bro 5 year ago I searched Stars comparing I got your video that video song I love it and when I wana listen iam playing it on UA-cam
Are you from austria?
Yes
@@morn1415 No wonder your accent is similar to Arnold Schwarzenegger! 😀
@@djentlover I´ll be bäck!
@@morn1415 Das be Bach
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Sebastian_Bach
Really like your videos
One thing I found disappointing about space images of Earth was that 99.999% of them always show Earth with the Sinai peninsula . . as if no other part of Earth was presentable. Also, why no shots of earth from way, way out where, surely, there are satellites with cameras. How about a half lit Earth with half lit moon in same shot. Etc. Instead we get some "style conscious" NASA propagandist giving what they deem most impressive. We want raw photos, ugly or not. Not popularized imagery.
Then you will love this movie.
ua-cam.com/video/IywttKTpe5U/v-deo.html
(Looked through 15000 images from the Apollo program for that.)
Yes, some images got famous, so we see them over and over again. But during my research I saw many Images of earth half lit and from all sides.
A slideshow of some and the reasons why for a long time we did not have real images from earth, you will find here:
ua-cam.com/video/S57ok74DLwM/v-deo.html
@@morn1415 : Terrific! thanks alot!
Very interesting and well-thought video, I only watched it because I love space! Never the less, good quality
Images not fake but neptune,s moon triton image is fake
I don't understand why space scientists themselves don't explain this stuff.
Fantastic job tho MORN👍👍
Experts often have trouble preparing information for laymen. There are very valuable exceptions. Science communicators. This is important, as science built a lot of the world around us.
Could you imagine spending time on the space station, watching our planet spin. Then come home to someone saying the earth is flat and stars are fake. I would not waste my time on them either. Lol
@@Reavertide Edgar Mitchell, Apollo Astronaut, after seeing the earth from the Moon, put it like this (...a bit rude):
"You develop an instant global consciousness, a people orientation, an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world, and a compulsion to do something about it.
From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, "Look at that, you son of a b****!!!"
@@morn1415 Perhaps it should be a requirement to be a politician, at the very least a national leader, but we can only hope.
They do, when they have the time and will, but it's not their primary job. They already have a lot of work, and science isn't exactly a safe environment. There is a lot of competition for fame and money. Scientific popularization is still often perceived as a secondary goal at best, but more usually as a waste of time and ressource for professors who already struggle to do science, teach science and have a life.
Average people should be visiting the Moon by VR... just to get the perspective.
Илон Маск прав, мы живём в виртуальном мире. Всё вокруг матрица.
Excellent 👌
We have a lot of conspiracy theories in Russia! Power promotes and encourages this. 🤦♀️
They are probably all around the world right now. I think it will be the main challenge of the next decades. In a few years we will argue about if certain countries exist.
@@morn1415 👍🔥
@@kirkhamandy Ok, maybe I overestimated the time frame. :/
Creamy Pasta Theres even people who say Finland is fake. Imagine another conspiracy theory that says America is fake? 😂
@@firemangan2731 there are some people that believe the sun, sky and earth are fake, some people think that the rainbow things in clouds are “higher dimensional beings” and “they” are making us see them now, i swear if they blame it on the government then i’m going crazy
Nice job. Only comment -- the word "conspiracy" has a short I, not a long one, so it is not pronounced like "conspire-assy." Rather, it's like kon-SPUR-uh-see... Hope that helps. Otherwise, amazing work, mah dude.
Thanks for the tiep. ;)
@@morn1415 Haha! Told you my friend!
Great Video. I hope it is oke to link this to some of the dicussions with Flat-earthler, I have sometimes.
I know a few Flat-earthler personally and it's sad to see how people drift away from reality and call it awakening.
Maybe it won't help, but hope dies last.
Thanks and Danke
Their motto is "Complain instead of explain, distract and dislike." If they are unable to understand explanations (especially as complicated as here), let them do the explanation.
In my video "Why flat earth failed" I showed a simple thing observable in the sky for everybody.
ua-cam.com/video/ZMtx5jVLUaU/v-deo.html
Two celestial poles. One visible from north of the equator, one visible from south of the equator. One rotating clockwise, one counter clockwise. On the flat earth the equator is just an arbitrary circle without meaning. I requested to have that explained with the flat earth model.
Nobody could or even tried in 15000 comments.
Make them aware that the flat earth model does not work by never stopping asking them. Don´t let yourself be diverted with distraction techniques. Flat earth is not able to explain the real world. As simple as that.
@Lacey Rowe If this is the sad thing, I would like to know, what you believe in and why?
@Lacey Rowe This is a list of things, which you dont believe in. Is asked what you believe in.
@Lacey Rowe Then you believe in the "fact" that nothing can be believed. This is really sad because it means that no one will ever be able to help you. If I am wrong about something, it is always possible to convince me with a better argument or derivation. But you will never be able to believe anything other than nothing, because something has deprived you of the opportunity to argue out of anything other than uncertainty.
@Lacey Rowe You can't even measure your range of vision with your eyes. Your hearing spectrum with your ears. Your sensitivity with your hands and smell and taste are the most subjective of all.
In your science there is no knowledge that you can share with others, because whether other people perceive the same thing as I do, I cannot measure with my senses. The fact that there is a tree in front of my house would only be proven when everyone has seen it and itentified it as a tree. Whether everyone understands the same thing about a tree cannot be verified.
Is a 5 cm line, because I draw with a ruler, only 5 cm long for me? Or does it even have a defined length because I used something other than my eyes.
To argue in your favor: For you, the human senses are your religion and you give them godlike power that they don't even have.
A pig has 5 times more taste buds than a human. A bat can hear ultrasound. Most insects can see UV light and polarized light and 'feel' magnetic field lines. A dog can smell 100 times better. The list goes on and on. Do these beings understand more about the world than we do? No. Why not? Perhaps because there are more ways of explaining reality than through the primary faculties of the senses. I can't see the 1 + 1 = 2 either. I can understand it though. And if I could see it, I could understand it without having to see it.
A few weeks ago I lost my sense of smell for a few days. However, the milk in my fridge was spoiled even though I couldn't smell it ... Your God let me down at this point. It's a shame I couldn't see the microorganisms in my milk. They are just too small, but they exist.
but are you having a conversations with yourself
Coz dey iz
You explained away and rationalized why fake space images are acceptable.
These images look fine, the issue is w the absence of hundreds of shaky videos made by astronauts showing the earth and sun and moon - like “Hi honey, I miss you. Daddy will be back soon. Look at this view.” It’s the dog that didn’t bark. The absence of these videos about space is as suspicious as a lack of videos of tourists that just came back from the Grand Canyon. Also notice you have never seen any space debris (of which they always show tons of in simulated videos) in any of the space walk or space station or launch videos you’ve ever seen. There are continuity problems that are less sophisticated than the lighting of a 3D object in a 2D image.
The blue pill is totally fine but if you’re really gonna ask the tough questions, you gotta look at the big picture. Ignore the conspiracy theories and debunking their logical fallacies. It’s endless and fruitless. You gotta ask the good questions yourself.
@@FRNKNSTNmusic Most conspiracy theories originate from a lack of logical deduction and wanting to look at the "big picture" (which is mostly a preconception).
Conspiracy theories are is born here.
After a while new information is only viewed at in the framework of the conspiracy.
In principle these are valid questions you asked. So if you care what is true you have to think. That´s the cumbersome task, there is no way around that.
Lets look at what you miss:
“Hi honey, I miss you. Daddy will be back soon. Look at this view.”
Questions to ask:
- Is there cellphone reception in the ISS?
- If these videos exist (though direct channels by the space agency) whom are they directed at? Is there a reason they are private?
- There are lots of shaky video recordings from the ISS and the Apollo program, but hardly a view outside, because there are hardly windows, is there a reason?
- How much time do Astronauts have anyway?
I conclude the question section with this nice image of somebody posing Star Trek style in front of the cupola, a window that cost 20 million Euros.
twitter.com/esa/status/773816518895398913/photo/1
While looking at the big picture, people forget to look at other pictures.
Nobody wants to investigate evidence against their case.
Anyway there are lots of astronauts on social media already flooding it with media (uploading when they are back on earth of course).
There is another reason images from space are often too perfect. They are selected of course for the nice ones (Like everybody does for Instagram...).
But huge databases exist. I looked through 15000 once for bad ones. :)
ua-cam.com/video/IywttKTpe5U/v-deo.html
I don't understand the comparison? Majority of humans use senses as tools to determine what's reality right? So if Majority of humans can only prove that planets are real by sight and the rest is left to word of mouth how can you claim it to be real? So if i seen a tree from 1,000,000 miles away is it a possibility it might just be a bush? So if trees are real then all mythical trees, fictional trees in entertainment, and stories of trees are all real? So if a grandfather tell his son stay away from the woods there are walking killer trees in there and the son grows up and tells you did you know there are killer trees? So because trees are real thats proves killer walking trees are real? It seems like both sides have many of the same questions memorized. No im not a flat earther.
@@mataperro818 That´s why eye witness account is not a valid tool to evaluate what is true in science. It is only valid at court, which is a shame. There are hundreds of psychological factors that influence what we see or what we think to have seen.
Welcome back?
...he never left
I miss the „celestial objects at ISS distance“ videos that were once on this channel :-(
Are you sure? Can´t remember I made one. But sounds interesting. Will take it as a suggestion. :)
This concept is from the UA-cam channel Yeti dynamics
@@bloomp7999 @morn1415 phew you're right. I somehow took them for one and the same person
@@Geomanb they're both great
So is my point of view photoshopped when I look up at night?
Depends if you have a monitor mounted on the ceiling.
@@morn1415 No I mean outside bro.
@@atroxarmy870 That would require a huge display, so probably not. ;)
@@morn1415 Okay so then what makes these people think that space is fake?
@@atroxarmy870 What makes people think space is fake? Good question. To my experience there are lots of factors:
- Ignorance
- Lack of education
- Lazyness in reseaching information
- Inability of combining information
But the most important factor:
- Tribalism in connection with Social Media
(Recent Phenomenon)
If somebody has a random belief, through modern networks he can find easily all other people on the planet having the same belief. The more people belive things, the more people will think there is something to it. People want to belong to a group and rarely just care about what is true.
Example: Somebody believes in Fairies. When checking online, he will easily find all people believing in Fairies. They will talk, come together and confirm each other. Other people will see this and think there must be something to it and also become Fairy believers. So the community grows.
While it is impossible to check if Fairies exist, it is easy to check if space is fake.
But some people ignore this information because they are not satisfied with their life and are looking for somebody to blame. So they say the government is lying and taking their money.
The people in power on the other hand (who are really lying) are very happy about people thinking space is fake, because these are the people having no idea what is going on and where their money really goes.
That´s the short version. :)
Short answer. Because they are.
it's all composite images stitched together, and probably touched up a little.
I don't know why it's impossible to just photograph an entire planet with a single shot, and not mash together other photos into it.
if the planet is to big to photograph then take the picture from farther away.
Hahah no explanation here this mis info
There are no real images.
E
First!
TheBNSFchick no ur not I am
@@I_spawn OOF
هههزع!زلخع!زخلاحعزاللالااعااحعحاحا
Dude, I can paint this easily in photo shop!
Even if you can, what does that have to do with anything? If somebody can create realistic fake images of trees, does that mean all images of trees are fake then?
The images are fake.
Yoshigon34 Ba dum pssss
Why Something fake Is not actually fake
The video
People commenting on a video in a way that is explained in the beginning of the video.
The comment
@@morn1415 you are Just using simple tricks to do not prove nothing
Pictures are fake and has been proved so many times that an Indian like you cannot even count.
You are wasting people time with Total Bs
Well, if you think that I am an Indian that makes you double wrong now. If what you believe were true, you could provide evidence for your claims.
@@morn1415 bwahahahaha use Google i am not your personal Debunker
If you use your brain i am sure you can find It on nasa website and check the pictures photoshopped by yourself
Go and check
@@NwoSaturn I just wanted to demonstrate that you have no point except bwahaha.
Everybody with Google and a brain can check which images are genuine and which are artworks, sure.
Everybody who doesn't like to think, or understand things, thinks all are fake. That's it.
Bro look at pics of earth from year to year the whole color and size of continents in relation to the rest of earth changes from year to year they r legit computer generated images. Or fake! Have some intellectual integrity the next time you try to tackle any subject matter
Step1: Watch this video where I went into the effort of investigating real and fake images of the earth in the second half.
ua-cam.com/video/S57ok74DLwM/v-deo.html
Step2: Present two real images you want to argue about regarding their changes. I am here.
Step3: Next time somebody cries "fake" in regards to the images of earth, check which one he is referring to.
Where are your images? Obviously you are either a simple troll or you can't go find that data you claim you can. A pretty weak performance, bro.
#RTXOn
These images are computerised
You're smart.
Fake because do you ever see it yourself
If you get a proper Telescope, you can look at Saturn.
can u see ur brain
poggers
It looks fake.
You should NOT lump all "conspiracy theorists" into one group. Although I'm not one who thinks the pictures are fake at all, I do understand. However, you decided to go the low road and played out the simplest strawman. Now you conflate the least intelligent thoughts like planets being fake, with what people really talk about. Which is how fake and over-processed deep sky images are. There is no standard for colors and contrast. It becomes fanciful art with no explanation, often times. This is what people call fake. I guess anyone with any question at all....it's just easier to lump them all together. If I believe there is a nefarious group that caused a particular unnatural catastrophe then I guess that means I believe Bigfoot did it? You stereotyped very hard here.
BTW - We are tiny, but not insignificant. We may not be special. But we might be. Some of your videos have a strain of nihilism in it. Whether overused cliche or trying to impart your own philosophy, it just doesn't fit anymore. As an agnostic I find atheists to be just about as arrogant as any theist.
Other than that....absolutely great work.
Whahaha, totally fake!!!
Cons pirate see?
Off corsss pirats can ssee.
They look fake Because they are fake. Boom Shyamalan twist!
Uh, NASA provides the images. They told us they're not real. What more do you need?
A brain. :) NASA is specific about which images are real and which are not (...otherwise link anywhere NASA says all images are fake).
Also there are 70 space agencies all over the world, a lot with launching capabilities.
Because they are fake.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
You have no heart
They are fake images.
Just to correct ONE glaring error is this video... 'Conspiracy Theorists' DON'T THINK!
Great video apart from that 😁