Proof by Contradiction | ExamSolutions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @joshuafrancis5980
    @joshuafrancis5980 2 роки тому +30

    Big up my guy. Finally been able to understand Proof by Contradiction after months of struggling with it. Will definitely be using the NACC method from now on. Cheers man, keep the vids coming!!!

  • @gaara6732
    @gaara6732 2 роки тому +4

    This has been do helpful!!!! You totally saved my college algebra grade. Keep up the great work

  • @AshVentureOfficial
    @AshVentureOfficial 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you, this is the video I was waiting for

  • @muffinsissad8737
    @muffinsissad8737 2 роки тому +5

    6:33 thanks for the daily reminder

  • @donatusmkwaila8519
    @donatusmkwaila8519 10 місяців тому

    Thanks ❤❤

  • @Funnyvidslaughter
    @Funnyvidslaughter Рік тому

    Thank you so much for this amazing explanation really appreciate it

  • @esha3274
    @esha3274 2 роки тому +2

    I have a question like why we are assuming a/b in it’s simplest form ?

  • @tacheemmnanuel
    @tacheemmnanuel 9 місяців тому

    God bless you sir i am very grateful

  • @jiaanaq3114
    @jiaanaq3114 Рік тому

    This was so helpful !!!

  • @souppp-nh7wf
    @souppp-nh7wf 2 роки тому +2

    11:17 can someone please explain to me why if the square root of 2 is rational 2 = a/b many thanks

    • @ExamSolutions_Maths
      @ExamSolutions_Maths  2 роки тому +1

      That is because a rational number can be written as a fraction. If square root of 2 is a rational number, then we should be able to write the result as a fraction such as a/b where a and b are integers. If square root of 2 is irrational, then we wouldn't be able to write it as a fraction

  • @markmohammed1405
    @markmohammed1405 Рік тому

    The correct breakdown should of been. U square both sides and then multiply throughout by b²

  • @aashsyed1277
    @aashsyed1277 2 роки тому +2

    But why do we assume that a/b is in simplest form why not any form is it because that any fraction can be simplified ?

  • @hrperformance
    @hrperformance 2 роки тому +5

    I thought this was a really good explanation. Great video 👌🏽
    Can you please try to make the audio consistent and less "echoey"? It's not a big deal but would definitely make a positive difference! The audio was best for a couple of short periods at the beginning of the video.
    The last proof was really cool but at the same time intimidating...left to my own devices, I don't think I would have been able to complete step 3.

    • @ExamSolutions_Maths
      @ExamSolutions_Maths  2 роки тому +5

      Thanks for the feedback J.J
      Yes for step 3, you have to go along with logical calculations and make reasonable conclusions/deductions along the way.
      This is where your understanding of numbers properties and working with numbers and algebraic expressions is very important.

  • @are_radrole
    @are_radrole 2 роки тому +2

    I was expecting an explanation after every move

  • @markmohammed1405
    @markmohammed1405 Рік тому

    b × Square root of 2 = b sqare root 2 . Not square root of 2b.

  • @faheemiqbal9665
    @faheemiqbal9665 2 роки тому +3

    how are we proving n^2 and n both being even by assuming n to be odd and finding n^2 to be odd? disproving the assumption does not prove the original statement what so ever
    the assumption was not matched either if we proved the assumption wrong then it would have made sense

    • @galaxygamerpro3868
      @galaxygamerpro3868 2 роки тому

      because any odd number squared is odd
      there is no even square which can have an odd square root
      so the assumption is proved wrong
      and so because the root (n) is not odd, it must be even

  • @mandarkm
    @mandarkm 5 місяців тому

    there is no God " but God "
    there is no God (statement)
    but only one true God (negation)

  • @memesforyou6943
    @memesforyou6943 Рік тому

    🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰