@@alexhuntley3810 Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible. Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
There is ample evidence most of the pyramid blocks were made of geosynthetic concretelike limestone blocks composed of limestone aggregates and old form of cement , Lime and Sodium carbonate. The geosynthetic granites of the pyramids to me would then have been made of an earlier form of Lime composed liquid glass probably from Lime and sand under heat as binders for aggregate granite or other stones.
cant they tell the difference between natural limesttone and this geopolymer limestone?? surely it must look different under a microscope or spectrometry
Takehiko, thank you for your video, but I think it would be more interesting, if you explain personally what you are doing and why. For example - why this special mixture? And you didn't mention the inventor of geopolymer, Dr. Davidovits.
Great video! I was already aware that it had to be geopolymer concrete, but your scientific visualization is greatly appreciated. Thanks for sharing this informative video! Greetings from Germany.
The best part was at the end where they showed it and it looked exactly like what is found in ancient sites. ! 🤣🤣 I take it you were also being sarcastic as well.
I think they had both advanced machinery and advanced geo polymers, you need machinery to polish blocks afterwards, also there are granite mounds around India that have been carved away, to leave the exquisite temples imbedded within, and lots of examples of blocks being left in mid quarry globally. Also in Egypt there are the remains of a massive granite statue that has flint and quartz veins and would have stood as tall as the Statue of Liberty. Given the toughness of the granite blocks at Giza, you would need machinery to polish or correct any casting mistakes, or you would need machinery to mine it from a mountain, either 🤷♂️way you need advanced machinery which is way beyond what is currently claimed, so sit back down u chumps that think u can just shut the book on this ting now, not that you have. Just anyone out there who thinks this is the trump card for advanced machinery, it’s not, we still have the rest of the puzzle to solve and it’s one of those billion piece puzzles that old people buy😂 Also as far as Ik, no one recently has made truly solid granite geo polymer like it is at Giza - if it even is. And yes I’m aware the pyramids are not made of granite although it is featured.
literally shows nothing but chemicals you can't get and zero results. Pressure? Are you kidding. This is not natural . STONE is natural and they cut it.
Hi, I'm from Vietnam, I'm researching geopolymer concrete and testing them. Can you give me a look at the formula, the ratio of substances that you studied in the video. Sincerely thank you !
Usually you wait 24 hours to demould them. Some mixtures need only 4 hours or less. Heating up increases the solidification reaction greatly. 60 to 80 °C for instance, and covered to prevent from drying.
You spent all that time and effort carefully mixing the ingredients, but the end result was just a puddle of dirty slime. Wasn’t it supposed to harden in a mold?
@@takehikomidorikawa7767 Not trying to be a jerk but all I saw in your video was that stuff going all over the floor. You didn’t show anything that looked solid
This method is valid for what it makes; a small amount of geopolymer; Can it scale upward? Can someone make a fighter jet after doing a questionable proof of concept after making a mere paper airplane?
Interesting, but where or how did the ancient builders acquire the personal protective clothing, the non-reactive mixing vessels and the process chemicals in such a vast amount to produce such huge and immense blocks. That is not mentioned the pouring forms required.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭😫😩😁😆😄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Cool story bro!
@@manjichromagnon5480 Name one prroduct or construction project using that product. Certainly that technology would not be available to build pyramids.
@@luisgalleguillos4868 Brisbane Airport is made almost entirely from geopolymer. The company Wagners (Australia) offers commercial geopolymer for construction. There are some of their projects shown on the website. In my new upcoming book about geopolymer chemistry will be a three page long table with companys who commercialised geopolymer materials.
@@131_chidghandixit4 Hello, good to know that there are geopolymer nerds out there other than me 😉. What do you mean? You working with geopolymers or you make content? The information you mentioned is part of a soon-to-be published book. So maybe to put it in the internet prematurely is not a good idea. But one of the coolest companies may be "Renca" of Russia. They are printing whole buildings made from geopolymers with a 3D printer. There are videos of this on UA-cam. One is named "Geopolymer Concrete: from Lab to Industry". I hope I could help. Have a good one!
No it wasn't used to build Pyramids or the walls in Peru... There are quarries that they cut stones out of them with precision. 2 to 70 tons slab of stones. Also some stones have fossils in em! I'd go with the Stone Softening Liquid theory.
Volcanic mud which was still soft after the great flood aproximately 4500 years ago.Early man shaped with simple tools. Petrification depends on chemistry.Most neolithic sites show evidence of this event.
They were advanced enough to do this before the cataclysm. I wonder where they went, and hiw they influenced us. There skulls and foot prints show them to be about 10 Meters tall. Thats 30 feet, or basically a giant. Prolly could have told us sapiens to do whatever they wanted.
Until anyone re-creates what exists, it is only a theory🤣😂🤣 what I want to know is how did they shape the entire plateau out of bedrock that’s way harder than any of the construction that sits there, we don’t do very much to bedrock even now….
Not if they created the entire plateau I know it sounds like too big of a job But they've now shown that the soil in the Amazon basin was all man-made So if you can make all the soil in a rain forest you can make a big plateau
The theory is a nice idea, but definitely wrong. If megalithic structures were made in this way years of erosion would have exposed the agragates that were close to the original surface. Also you do not crush the agragate when making it because then your concrete has no strength to it. Even in a geopolymerized concrete the strength comes from the agragates being pressed against each other. Like the portland in traditional concrete, the polymers just keep the agragate held in place. Without solid agragates to give structural strength, the weight of pieces on top would cause stresses that make the lower pieces crack and break. There is no evidence to support this theory due to the lack of agragate in the weathered megalithic stones, and without sizable agragates in a concrete it would not last long. There is also the fact that while geopolymerized concrete are cheaper and reach structural strengths faster than traditional concretes, they structure is not as stable over time and do not last as long. Traditional concretes using portland and water begin degrading after about 50 years, and geopolymerized concretes begin to degrade even faster.
Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible. Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
I seem to remember some blocks were geopolymere and some were not. I think maybe the larger ones lower down were geopolymere. Can't remember might be backwards and smaller up top were. You can see some ground level with the bumps on them. Maybe some outer stones were. Still a problem. I've heard ideas about water buyancy to float stones up. Might be the best idea.
They were simply clay/limestone earth that was scooped up from the edges of Lake natron and packed into forms. There is no reason for fossils to be ground up. SEM proves it
They actually took the fake pyramid blocks to labs and the labs couldn't tell which was fake and which was natural limestone. The fossils aren't ground up because they use loosely bound limestone aggregate, not ground limestone. Watch the videos. Andesite - ua-cam.com/video/rf9qK9QTlq0/v-deo.html
Concrete or limestone isn't really interesting. People have been making this for almost 10.000 years (if not longer). What would be interesting though is to make a Granite polymer
People forget the study that gave us this back was made in south america and it is what the ancient native americans did, and probably other civilizations like gobekli tepe
I believe something similar was used to build statues but the structure of pyramids, threre were of 3 main materials and they were not molded. Granite Limstone Sandstone
@@VenturaIT yes interesting, strange its not acknowledged more but cannot argue solid granite is solid granite, its easy to tell which is which, the moldings are filled with air pores like a casting!!
@@thecure4470 They sent the fake limestone to labs, the labs couldn't tell which was real limestone and which was fake limestone, even using a scanner electron microscope. "6- There are granite blocks that are carved but roughly trimmed. So, your theory is wrong. We have never claimed granite was artificial (another hearsay). Indeed, granite is not carved (they did not have the right tools) but split (a very different skill). You will read below in the extended abstract under the “Religious context” why they used granite, because it represents the southern country. The granite was not carved in a quarry, but simply taken from individual boulders found in great quantities in the Aswan region. The boulders were split to fine dressed faces, leaving a typical rough undressed back. They represent less than 0.1% of the total blocks. Workers had 10 years to install them in the pyramid, and 10 years to carve a unique sarcophagus with whatever technique they have at their disposal. In short, we don’t care! We care about the 99.9% of limestone blocks. For Kheops, one block must be placed every 3 minutes." www.geopolymer.org/faq/faq-for-artificial-stone-supporters/
Vent IT, your thinking too much and going off on a tangent, the Granite boxes of Saquara weighing 130 tonnes each were carved from solid granite, its a complete retangle with a mortice lid some 10 feet by 10 ft solid, the inside has perpendicular inner cornering without any tool marks, this cannot be explained, I couldnt even attempt to try, scholars and scientists are baffled....all 35 of them, under ground and bigger than the passageway!
@@thecure4470 No, you're the one on a tangent. This is a video about the blocks of the pyramid and geopolymers not about something else, just because there is something completely different doesn't mean or prove that they are carved or cast. it doesn't mean anything. Perhaps the box is carved, I haven't seen any xray or electron microscope examination of the box you are talking about. I'd wait to hear a real scientist like Davidovitz comment about it before I make a decision. Problem is that archaeology isn't really a science, it's an "activity" or a "study" but not a pure science. Geopolymer is a science. Nobody really knows what happened in the past, but the best theory is the geopolymer theory and for a theory to come in out of the blue and be able to have all the science support it 100% is impressive. Right now it's the leading theory. That doesn't mean they didn't split natural rock. It doesn't mean they didn't cast granite that looks natural then split it. It doesn't mean anything. There are bowls and containers that are also different kind of geopolymer than just limestone, or the stones in south America, geopolymers can be nearly any type of earthen material.
Right...look at how much mix , water and time you would need for one block. Then the curing time, forms for each one... amazing idea but go touch some grass
This idea is totally misconceived. The whole point about the geopolymer theory was to explain in terms of moulding heavy blocks of stone whose structure, size and/or numbers was hard to explain in terms of the technology/tools known to have been possessed by the indigenous people. There is NO evidence of moulding - all the blocks are of DIFFERENT shape and size - precisely what gangs of men would produce who had to remove what was available in quarries. The quarries used either on the Giza plateau to build the pyramids or near the megalithic sites in Peru and Bolivia are well-known and prove from scientific assays that the blocks were hewn from them - their mineralogy proves it. So why on earth would any people MOULD their building blocks when it was simpler to extract them from quarries? The geopolymer theory is useless, disproved by tons of evidence and has no power to explain anything better than conventional explanation coupled with lost high-technologies. The geopolymer theory crept in through the backdoor of popular interest in alternatives to academic views about megalathic monuments. But there was never any need for it! Quite apart from no evidence to support it other than contentious claims made by the Geopolymer Institute, which have been thoroughly debunked by many scientists and which have never been tested by any other laboratory.
Nonsense. The blocks still have marks from the molds on them. Different shapes because different bags and boards are used of different sizes since it is stronger.
Freemasons built not only the pyramids, but most of the European castles and cathedrals. The imprints of the bags they poured to stuff in are still there for all to see, it's impossible to chisel stone so the surface looks like burlap. And not only that, the magnetic signatures of the stones in the pyramids all line up, so what ancient technology did they use to detect those signatures so they could do that and why would they? To provide evidence for a hoax to be perpetrated 3 millennia later? Geopolymer concrete is believable. Slaves carving stone with copper chisels to fit millions of stones so tightly together you cannot slip a razor blade in between them is not.
If they were quarried blocks then how do explain that in many places there are no gaps, if you look closely you will see them, that can only happen because the blocks hadn't cured properly when they were situated next to each other.
@@hasanx4637 RC Hobbyist Extreme is a timetraveller. What he doesn't know is that limestone plaster turns back into limestone (indistinguisable from natural limestone). And there have been traces of limestone cement inside the Gizeh Pyramids. Also, many tombs have plaster interior. Anyway. Enjoy: ua-cam.com/video/znQk_yBHre4/v-deo.html
You can make concrete blocks as large as you like. Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible. Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
Now I can build my pyramids, thank you.
haha lol ^^ Then please show us when you are ready, Pharao ;D
Notice the total ignorance of the toxic dangers of this process. Outrageous and proves they did not do this.
I was watching Paul Cooks videos and for some reason the algos sent me here I wonder if it is because he says geopolymer 20 times in most videos.
Literally looking at this to fix the dam potholes in my area, the county has come and “patched” then but as soon a it rains again. Patch is gone.
Great. Now I know how to pour clear liquid for 2 minutes.
Everything you need to know, clear as mud !
That is an unfounded statement!
The millions of blocks of the great pyramids have 1000s of different shapes and sizes.
its proven that the facing blocks were geopolymer.
The particles all aligned magnetically since cast.
Cba to find the study sorry
@@alexhuntley3810 Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible.
Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
@@Mojo_Dojo333 It was more tropical in Egypt when these were done. That sand came later. Shits way older than they say. Geopolymer or not.
@@dsm091 don't drink and comment...
When you deagglomerate limestone the fossils aren't destroyed. Look up Davidovits making "pyramid blocks". In france
Did the Egyptians order from the same manufacturer?
No,they ordered from China.There are accurate documentations proving it was done.
List your ingredients for your recipe. I can't read Japanese
There is ample evidence most of the pyramid blocks were made of geosynthetic concretelike limestone blocks composed of limestone aggregates and old form of cement , Lime and Sodium carbonate. The geosynthetic granites of the pyramids to me would then have been made of an earlier form of Lime composed liquid glass probably from Lime and sand under heat as binders for aggregate granite or other stones.
cant they tell the difference between natural limesttone and this geopolymer limestone?? surely it must look different under a microscope or spectrometry
Takehiko, thank you for your video, but I think it would be more interesting, if you explain personally what you are doing and why. For example - why this special mixture?
And you didn't mention the inventor of geopolymer, Dr. Davidovits.
Great video! I was already aware that it had to be geopolymer concrete, but your scientific visualization is greatly appreciated. Thanks for sharing this informative video! Greetings from Germany.
The best part was at the end where they showed it and it looked exactly like what is found in ancient sites. ! 🤣🤣 I take it you were also being sarcastic as well.
You have a good start but failed to show us the end product! Very disappointing!
Because it is a joke
Can you please share the design mix proportions
Please
Look for intact quartz veins in the stone to determine if they have been ground
If they have veins then they were not ground up
I think they had both advanced machinery and advanced geo polymers, you need machinery to polish blocks afterwards, also there are granite mounds around India that have been carved away, to leave the exquisite temples imbedded within, and lots of examples of blocks being left in mid quarry globally. Also in Egypt there are the remains of a massive granite statue that has flint and quartz veins and would have stood as tall as the Statue of Liberty. Given the toughness of the granite blocks at Giza, you would need machinery to polish or correct any casting mistakes, or you would need machinery to mine it from a mountain, either 🤷♂️way you need advanced machinery which is way beyond what is currently claimed, so sit back down u chumps that think u can just shut the book on this ting now, not that you have. Just anyone out there who thinks this is the trump card for advanced machinery, it’s not, we still have the rest of the puzzle to solve and it’s one of those billion piece puzzles that old people buy😂 Also as far as Ik, no one recently has made truly solid granite geo polymer like it is at Giza - if it even is. And yes I’m aware the pyramids are not made of granite although it is featured.
Went out and watched the grass grow it was a lot faster .
I am a stickler for ALL NATURAL ingredients....must have been done, evidence is everywhere.
literally shows nothing but chemicals you can't get and zero results. Pressure? Are you kidding. This is not natural . STONE is natural and they cut it.
Hi, I'm from Vietnam, I'm researching geopolymer concrete and testing them. Can you give me a look at the formula, the ratio of substances that you studied in the video. Sincerely thank you !
How did the Egyptians get a hold of fly ash, blast furnace slag, water glass, and sodium hydroxide?
chemistry - Khem egyptian God.
Waterglass is from lye from burning wood... you can do the rest lol
@@louisebrookes2630 Well, explain the blast furnace slag and sodium hydroxide. Give the entire explanation or its BS to sound smart. lol
Fly ash in the US is all spoken for already and is used as an additive in cements and concretes. Not really available in building supplies.
quite simple really. the hard part came with the mathematics and the science to make it all fit.
Usually you wait 24 hours to demould them. Some mixtures need only 4 hours or less. Heating up increases the solidification reaction greatly. 60 to 80 °C for instance, and covered to prevent from drying.
So if this method was used to build the pyramids then today they would be about half way to completion.
Lot of work to prove nothing .
You spent all that time and effort carefully mixing the ingredients, but the end result was just a puddle of dirty slime. Wasn’t it supposed to harden in a mold?
After 30 minutes in the mold, it became very hard. The exact compressive strength test will be conducted next year.
@@takehikomidorikawa7767
Not trying to be a jerk but all I saw in your video was that stuff going all over the floor. You didn’t show anything that looked solid
Garbage, you lose my and your time to show nothing
@@mj101inf9 that mess on the floor is a slump test , try learning about concrete testing before you throw crap around
I too was disappointed in not seeing the final product.
Can you please share the mix design and codes book details used for this.
That would be to useful. Instead watch this video with the most annoying music playing in the background.
Background music will lead to insanity. Why for a technical video?
thats the point
Thank you very much for your video. I have a couple of questions. What role does pH play in the process? What was the pH of the fly ash?
You won't get an answer because it is a joke. They cut stone. Just like the mud they produced here, it muddies the waters of real research .
Can you share a video on ambient temperature curing of geopolymer concrete?
This method is valid for what it makes; a small amount of geopolymer; Can it scale upward? Can someone make a fighter jet after doing a questionable proof of concept after making a mere paper airplane?
He's making Joe Biden some new cement shoes for Christmas
Geopolymer does not use water glass! This is a ceramic, not a geopolymer.
Interesting, but where or how did the ancient builders acquire the personal protective clothing, the non-reactive mixing vessels and the process chemicals in such a vast amount to produce such huge and immense blocks. That is not mentioned the pouring forms required.
Easy. They probably didn't.
Looking at how people made hydrated lime back in the day. People wore long sleeves and got burned a lot.
Ancient ? Are you sure.
Descriptive subtitles would be nice.
does this require curing and how long does it to take to set..
Please tell correctly about raw materials and its ratio sir
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭😫😩😁😆😄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Cool story bro!
This is hot air or vapor ware . My guess is the whole idea of transplanting the idea of organic polymers to sand based polymers is impractical .
Not atall. Aluminosilicate geopolymer is amazing
@@manjichromagnon5480 Name one prroduct or construction project using that product. Certainly that technology would not be available to build pyramids.
@@luisgalleguillos4868 Brisbane Airport is made almost entirely from geopolymer. The company Wagners (Australia) offers commercial geopolymer for construction. There are some of their projects shown on the website. In my new upcoming book about geopolymer chemistry will be a three page long table with companys who commercialised geopolymer materials.
Hey Advmatlab , please will you share your those company name's and the collected info with me. I am also working on this project mate 🙂
@@131_chidghandixit4 Hello, good to know that there are geopolymer nerds out there other than me 😉.
What do you mean? You working with geopolymers or you make content? The information you mentioned is part of a soon-to-be published book. So maybe to put it in the internet prematurely is not a good idea. But one of the coolest companies may be "Renca" of Russia. They are printing whole buildings made from geopolymers with a 3D printer. There are videos of this on UA-cam. One is named "Geopolymer Concrete: from Lab to Industry".
I hope I could help. Have a good one!
No it wasn't used to build Pyramids or the walls in Peru... There are quarries that they cut stones out of them with precision. 2 to 70 tons slab of stones.
Also some stones have fossils in em!
I'd go with the Stone Softening Liquid theory.
Yeah, I think that "slump flow" would really have impressed those builders
esto todavia no explica como se hicieron los enormos bloques de granitos
What’s with the horrible background music.
any research paper for it
Click bait! You have no clue how the pyramids were built.
Thanks. 🇬🇧
Volcanic mud which was still soft after the great flood aproximately 4500 years ago.Early man shaped with simple tools. Petrification depends on chemistry.Most neolithic sites show evidence of this event.
The quarries are still there .
Thank you
Say all the coal burning places shut down then theres no fly ash then what would you use ?
Volcanic ash
@@funkyfiss most of people would never have access to it and companies would supply it at great cost for the areas that dont have access to it
There are myriads of alternatives out there, like natural pozzolans, agricultural waste ash and the like
@@funkyfiss say the volcanic mountains become dormant,what then?
@@briankarani3551 Not going to happen, right now there are over 1,300 active volcanoes today. And there is always new ones popping up.
They were advanced enough to do this before the cataclysm. I wonder where they went, and hiw they influenced us. There skulls and foot prints show them to be about 10 Meters tall. Thats 30 feet, or basically a giant. Prolly could have told us sapiens to do whatever they wanted.
Geopolymer concert thinks list please reply
Until anyone re-creates what exists, it is only a theory🤣😂🤣 what I want to know is how did they shape the entire plateau out of bedrock that’s way harder than any of the construction that sits there, we don’t do very much to bedrock even now….
Not if they created the entire plateau
I know it sounds like too big of a job
But they've now shown that the soil in the Amazon basin was all man-made
So if you can make all the soil in a rain forest you can make a big plateau
@@Bozemanjustin 100%
The theory is a nice idea, but definitely wrong. If megalithic structures were made in this way years of erosion would have exposed the agragates that were close to the original surface. Also you do not crush the agragate when making it because then your concrete has no strength to it. Even in a geopolymerized concrete the strength comes from the agragates being pressed against each other. Like the portland in traditional concrete, the polymers just keep the agragate held in place. Without solid agragates to give structural strength, the weight of pieces on top would cause stresses that make the lower pieces crack and break. There is no evidence to support this theory due to the lack of agragate in the weathered megalithic stones, and without sizable agragates in a concrete it would not last long. There is also the fact that while geopolymerized concrete are cheaper and reach structural strengths faster than traditional concretes, they structure is not as stable over time and do not last as long. Traditional concretes using portland and water begin degrading after about 50 years, and geopolymerized concretes begin to degrade even faster.
CHEM = Egypt. So was Egypt founded on Chemistry?
Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible.
Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
I seem to remember some blocks were geopolymere and some were not. I think maybe the larger ones lower down were geopolymere. Can't remember might be backwards and smaller up top were. You can see some ground level with the bumps on them. Maybe some outer stones were. Still a problem. I've heard ideas about water buyancy to float stones up. Might be the best idea.
The geopolimer gell is only a gleu of 5%of the total mix 95%is stil the old shunks of lime they see in de blocks
They were simply clay/limestone earth that was scooped up from the edges of Lake natron and packed into forms.
There is no reason for fossils to be ground up.
SEM proves it
They actually took the fake pyramid blocks to labs and the labs couldn't tell which was fake and which was natural limestone. The fossils aren't ground up because they use loosely bound limestone aggregate, not ground limestone. Watch the videos.
Andesite - ua-cam.com/video/rf9qK9QTlq0/v-deo.html
Concrete or limestone isn't really interesting. People have been making this for almost 10.000 years (if not longer).
What would be interesting though is to make a Granite polymer
This the milestone self
mesopotamians were making synthetic basalt 3,000 years ago.
@@papalegba6759 Source please.
@@gill7045 google doesn't work for you i presume? probably cos you're a chatbot or something? muting your dumb self w/e.
@@gill7045
Andesite - ua-cam.com/video/rf9qK9QTlq0/v-deo.html
hilarious, best part is the ending where you show nothing.
Geopolymer is good for a loadbearing system; for insulation go with CO2 aircrete.
what are the mix ratio ??
It doesn't exist
Could this have been done say, 10,000 YO?
This is NOT how you make geopolymer.
This is lab.
is the fly ash radioactive ?
No
@@shirinrezaeefakhr we have found some coal ash is radioactive. www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/
Settings time in concrete....
Obviously never touched any af those materials before let alone put concrete in a tube 😆
if that is right ? go and make a 400 ton block
People forget the study that gave us this back was made in south america and it is what the ancient native americans did, and probably other civilizations like gobekli tepe
sorry i had visited Egypt in march 2020 and Giza pyramids are all natural limestone and granite
Wasn't that the start of the lockdown ?
@@Mr.Grimsdale yes , we were cut of 2 days trip , one to Tanis
I believe something similar was used to build statues but the structure of pyramids, threre were of 3 main materials and they were not molded.
Granite
Limstone
Sandstone
Andesite - ua-cam.com/video/rf9qK9QTlq0/v-deo.html
@@VenturaIT yes interesting, strange its not acknowledged more but cannot argue solid granite is solid granite, its easy to tell which is which, the moldings are filled with air pores like a casting!!
@@thecure4470 They sent the fake limestone to labs, the labs couldn't tell which was real limestone and which was fake limestone, even using a scanner electron microscope.
"6- There are granite blocks that are carved but roughly trimmed. So, your theory is wrong.
We have never claimed granite was artificial (another hearsay). Indeed, granite is not carved (they did not have the right tools) but split (a very different skill). You will read below in the extended abstract under the “Religious context” why they used granite, because it represents the southern country. The granite was not carved in a quarry, but simply taken from individual boulders found in great quantities in the Aswan region. The boulders were split to fine dressed faces, leaving a typical rough undressed back. They represent less than 0.1% of the total blocks. Workers had 10 years to install them in the pyramid, and 10 years to carve a unique sarcophagus with whatever technique they have at their disposal. In short, we don’t care! We care about the 99.9% of limestone blocks. For Kheops, one block must be placed every 3 minutes."
www.geopolymer.org/faq/faq-for-artificial-stone-supporters/
Vent IT, your thinking too much and going off on a tangent, the Granite boxes of Saquara weighing 130 tonnes each were carved from solid granite, its a complete retangle with a mortice lid some 10 feet by 10 ft solid, the inside has perpendicular inner cornering without any tool marks, this cannot be explained, I couldnt even attempt to try, scholars and scientists are baffled....all 35 of them, under ground and bigger than the passageway!
@@thecure4470 No, you're the one on a tangent. This is a video about the blocks of the pyramid and geopolymers not about something else, just because there is something completely different doesn't mean or prove that they are carved or cast. it doesn't mean anything. Perhaps the box is carved, I haven't seen any xray or electron microscope examination of the box you are talking about. I'd wait to hear a real scientist like Davidovitz comment about it before I make a decision. Problem is that archaeology isn't really a science, it's an "activity" or a "study" but not a pure science. Geopolymer is a science. Nobody really knows what happened in the past, but the best theory is the geopolymer theory and for a theory to come in out of the blue and be able to have all the science support it 100% is impressive. Right now it's the leading theory. That doesn't mean they didn't split natural rock. It doesn't mean they didn't cast granite that looks natural then split it. It doesn't mean anything. There are bowls and containers that are also different kind of geopolymer than just limestone, or the stones in south America, geopolymers can be nearly any type of earthen material.
Still waiting.
Ya right. Ok.
Lol we’re are the factories that made the plastic buckets and chemicals????
Waste of time
I'm sorry your parents thought that
Right...look at how much mix , water and time you would need for one block. Then the curing time, forms for each one... amazing idea but go touch some grass
Slump test fail
This idea is totally misconceived. The whole point about the geopolymer theory was to explain in terms of moulding heavy blocks of stone whose structure, size and/or numbers was hard to explain in terms of the technology/tools known to have been possessed by the indigenous people. There is NO evidence of moulding - all the blocks are of DIFFERENT shape and size - precisely what gangs of men would produce who had to remove what was available in quarries. The quarries used either on the Giza plateau to build the pyramids or near the megalithic sites in Peru and Bolivia are well-known and prove from scientific assays that the blocks were hewn from them - their mineralogy proves it. So why on earth would any people MOULD their building blocks when it was simpler to extract them from quarries? The geopolymer theory is useless, disproved by tons of evidence and has no power to explain anything better than conventional explanation coupled with lost high-technologies. The geopolymer theory crept in through the backdoor of popular interest in alternatives to academic views about megalathic monuments. But there was never any need for it! Quite apart from no evidence to support it other than contentious claims made by the Geopolymer Institute, which have been thoroughly debunked by many scientists and which have never been tested by any other laboratory.
Nonsense. The blocks still have marks from the molds on them.
Different shapes because different bags and boards are used of different sizes since it is stronger.
@@manjichromagnon5480
Source, pictures of these?
The fake Davidovits limestone (pyramid blocks) was unable to be detected by independent labs.
Andesite - ua-cam.com/video/rf9qK9QTlq0/v-deo.html
Freemasons built not only the pyramids, but most of the European castles and cathedrals. The imprints of the bags they poured to stuff in are still there for all to see, it's impossible to chisel stone so the surface looks like burlap. And not only that, the magnetic signatures of the stones in the pyramids all line up, so what ancient technology did they use to detect those signatures so they could do that and why would they? To provide evidence for a hoax to be perpetrated 3 millennia later?
Geopolymer concrete is believable. Slaves carving stone with copper chisels to fit millions of stones so tightly together you cannot slip a razor blade in between them is not.
If they were quarried blocks then how do explain that in many places there are no gaps, if you look closely you will see them, that can only happen because the blocks hadn't cured properly when they were situated next to each other.
Does it mean all those Alien theories are fake news ? How disappointing. I was dreaming to be abducted. Now you have spoilt it for me
Geoplmer was on concrete
States video to make pyramid blocks... watches junkies in meth lab.
Not possible. Anyone can tell you the Egyptians did not EVER have this technology.
because you would know better?
@@hasanx4637 RC Hobbyist Extreme is a timetraveller.
What he doesn't know is that limestone plaster turns back into limestone (indistinguisable from natural limestone).
And there have been traces of limestone cement inside the Gizeh Pyramids. Also, many tombs have plaster interior.
Anyway. Enjoy:
ua-cam.com/video/znQk_yBHre4/v-deo.html
OFC, they did all their work with copper chisels, stone hammers and slave labour! Everyone knows that right! roflmao
It can't be gepolymer each block weighs several tons.
You can make concrete blocks as large as you like. Problem is many of the rocks on the pyramids, even the top ones, have fossils in them, that wouldn't survive the grinding process of the limestone. Therefore not possible.
Also in the "Kings Chamber" there are giant blocks weighing over 70 tons each made out of pure granite. And granite is impossible to make a geopolymer.
Um, no it wasn't.
bull
They quarried those stones and put them on top of each other after softening.
annoying brainless music instead of saying what the proportions quantities and details of the ingredients are
Geoplmer was on concrete
Geoplmer was on concrete