Wow this really IS excellent! Probably my favourite so far! You're so good at this... When you make pieces of cinematic score music (to my ears at least), it confirms to me that I'm right to follow the modular route... truly great piece of work!
The main cabinet and its two wings contain 24 modules, in the original system. Here i have the equivalent of 60 modules, so two and a half original systems. But the comparison is unfair : in the original series, the 1006 module can mix together up to four signals. So an original 1006 is more than a Behringer 1006. Same thing for the sequencer (ten steps on the original, against eight on the Behringer version). So four Behringer 1027 equal a bit more than three original 1027.
@@lnefpd Still! I was really following the development of Mos-Lab's 2500 clones. The switch matrices really make it difficult to transliterate into different formats. The 1047 filter needs all of those ins and outs. Your system is really nice! I particularly love the way you program, because having so many voices and options, and dealing with analog LFOs that can't really be syncd to one another it is super easy to end up with chaos that ruins the effort. You manage to pull it off very tastefully. Kudos!
@@Rhythmicons And actually the synchronisation is one of the issues with Behringer's version : the original 1004 has separate outputs for the different waveshapes, so you can use a triangle perfectly in phase with a pulse (to trigger something at the begining of the triangle cycle for instance). This is not possible on the Behringer 1004.
Yes! I’m really enjoying these!
Wow this really IS excellent! Probably my favourite so far! You're so good at this... When you make pieces of cinematic score music (to my ears at least), it confirms to me that I'm right to follow the modular route... truly great piece of work!
Nice, dark cinematic vibes! Always enjoy your patches and your dedication to this impressive 2500 system. Thanks for sharing. Cheers. :)
I completely agree... it's so inspiring 👌
If your system was laid out in the traditional 2500 style cabinetry, how many wings would you have?
The main cabinet and its two wings contain 24 modules, in the original system. Here i have the equivalent of 60 modules, so two and a half original systems.
But the comparison is unfair : in the original series, the 1006 module can mix together up to four signals. So an original 1006 is more than a Behringer 1006. Same thing for the sequencer (ten steps on the original, against eight on the Behringer version). So four Behringer 1027 equal a bit more than three original 1027.
@@lnefpd Still! I was really following the development of Mos-Lab's 2500 clones. The switch matrices really make it difficult to transliterate into different formats. The 1047 filter needs all of those ins and outs. Your system is really nice! I particularly love the way you program, because having so many voices and options, and dealing with analog LFOs that can't really be syncd to one another it is super easy to end up with chaos that ruins the effort. You manage to pull it off very tastefully. Kudos!
@@Rhythmicons And actually the synchronisation is one of the issues with Behringer's version : the original 1004 has separate outputs for the different waveshapes, so you can use a triangle perfectly in phase with a pulse (to trigger something at the begining of the triangle cycle for instance). This is not possible on the Behringer 1004.
@@lnefpd You deserve time on the real machine, but at least the Behringer won't catch on fire if you hook it up the wrong way.
My cat loves your music.