I am sure they are absolutely right. Waqar was the fiercest they had ever faced . However, had they faced Shoaib , they would have said that Shoaib is way quicker than Waqar
@@shujahmohammed9173Don't think Shoaib was way quicker. Waqar was consistently bowling early to mid 150s in 1993 Total series and 94 Mandela cup in SAF. So I presume he must be quicker before 92 back surgery. Hence Haynes did played against a very quick Waqar on the 1990 tour.
@@talhanaeem4364I absolutely agree with you to a certain extent. I am a huge fan of Waqar . Waqar was very quick from 89 to 92 . Waqar would be approximately between 155 to 157 kmph. Maybe max 158 kmph . However Shoaib could bowl faster as we have seen him bowl 158, 159, 160 and 161.3. If Shoaib would have tried harder, you never know he could have even reached 163. As a kid I would always think that no one can bowl faster than Waqar. However Shoaib broke that myth and it was obvious that Shoaib was quicker when he started out. Bowlers never feared Waqar , in the manner that they feared Shoaib. Remember that bowl to Stephen Fleming in 1999 World cup, it just showed what Shoaib could do. Shoaib was way quicker and always a fast bowler. Waqar after 1998 couldn’t cross 142 kmph. Shoaib even at the age of 36 could bowl at 156kmph . Shoaib was stronger than Waqar .
First of all , great commentary from Tony Greig And Bill Lawry . Cricket was pure gold in the 90s . Magnificent bowling action ( Waqar Younis ). And pitches were more conducive to fast bowlers and batsmen had to show true skills . Cricket now is just showy business thanks to BCCI manipulation and weak cricket administration from ICC .I still watch some games now and then but Cricket even during the T20 World Cup was extremely dull . Players seemed like going through the motions . There have been way too much commercialised cricket that it is losing its lustre.
Dragging in BCCI in these comments appears to be driven by Anti India sentiments and pure jealousy! Since 80% of the revenue gets generated by Indian Sponsorship and through Indian audience, it is quite natural that BCCI and Indian Cricket will have a lot of say in the world Cricket administration. Most sports are commercialized nowadays and Cricket cannot be an exception.
@@southcommercial6985 nope . That’s not true . I watch documentary of the 1983 World Cup with awe . I don’t hate Indian cricket but BCCI for its octopus tentacles 🦑actions regarding cricket administration. And even ICC .
In the early histroy, Haynes was a top 3 ODI player. Stats second to none. Viv was an anomaly. Zaheer played a very short time. Miandad and Dean Jones were the other greats.
Are you mad? Haynes was retired in 94, five years after Waqar began his career. And he was still good enough to score couple of 💯s against Pakistani in 93 test series, & a 💯 in his last ODI against Australia in 94. And Greenidge who was retired in 91 was also good enough to score a 200 in his 2nd last test series against Australia. So, don't talk rubbish only bcoz you are envious of Pakistani bowlers, you can't belittle them by this nonsense!
No mother can birth a child like waqar younus. I have heard rashid latief in ptv show of dr noman the guest was shoib Akhter and rashid latif said no bowler bowled like waqar in the history of cricket. I have seen thier spells that time we used to watch beginning and ending 15 overs due to double ws. Peoples buy ticket in black of front _screen pavilion end where waqar used to take run up that much beautiful run up he had. He is called death stood only 22 feet ahead. You can ask to england batsmen see interview of allan donald and many others what was the fear of borewala ecpress.
@amitjain11000 that is true...I also admit that he is tracking well though. But in all honesty you can only measure how great someone is once they retire.
Actually, Burmah is the greatest bowler of the 21st century, and no other bowler I have seen can come close to him. He has all the qualities of a brilliant bowler.
@iam6412 then you clearly don't know much about Cricket. Dale Steyn is well ahead of Bumrah. Maybe in India he is the greatest ever but saying he is the best of the 21st century is a stretch. Leave it to Indians to propagate this exagerration
@@mateen1979 Ball hit him above elbow of right hand. Umpire could not see that from his position, just saw ball deviate plus sound, so gave him out. Notice Haynes puts his right hand out and looks at it.
No mother can birth a child like waqar younus. I have heard rashid latief in ptv show of dr noman the guest was shoib Akhter and rashid latif said no bowler bowled like waqar in the history of cricket. I have seen thier spells that time we used to watch beginning and ending 15 overs due to double ws. Peoples buy ticket in black of front _screen pavilion end where waqar used to take run up that much beautiful run up he had. He is called death stood only 22 feet ahead. You can ask to england batsmen see interview of allan donald and many others what was the fear of borewala ecpress.
Waqar bowling..
Rashid keeping..
Haynes batting..
Bill Lawry commentating..
Can't get better !!!
Both Greenidge and Haynes regarded Waqar as one of the fiercest they had ever faced..
When did greenidge play waqar? He was already retired
I am sure they are absolutely right. Waqar was the fiercest they had ever faced . However, had they faced Shoaib , they would have said that Shoaib is way quicker than Waqar
no excuse for getting out
@@shujahmohammed9173Don't think Shoaib was way quicker.
Waqar was consistently bowling early to mid 150s in 1993 Total series and 94 Mandela cup in SAF. So I presume he must be quicker before 92 back surgery.
Hence Haynes did played against a very quick Waqar on the 1990 tour.
@@talhanaeem4364I absolutely agree with you to a certain extent. I am a huge fan of Waqar . Waqar was very quick from 89 to 92 . Waqar would be approximately between 155 to 157 kmph. Maybe max 158 kmph . However Shoaib could bowl faster as we have seen him bowl 158, 159, 160 and 161.3. If Shoaib would have tried harder, you never know he could have even reached 163. As a kid I would always think that no one can bowl faster than Waqar. However Shoaib broke that myth and it was obvious that Shoaib was quicker when he started out. Bowlers never feared Waqar , in the manner that they feared Shoaib. Remember that bowl to Stephen Fleming in 1999 World cup, it just showed what Shoaib could do. Shoaib was way quicker and always a fast bowler. Waqar after 1998 couldn’t cross 142 kmph. Shoaib even at the age of 36 could bowl at 156kmph . Shoaib was stronger than Waqar .
Golden period of waqar Wasim bowling.
brilliant bowling by Waqar, one of the very best overs
First of all , great commentary from Tony Greig And Bill Lawry . Cricket was pure gold in the 90s . Magnificent bowling action ( Waqar Younis ). And pitches were more conducive to fast bowlers and batsmen had to show true skills . Cricket now is just showy business thanks to BCCI manipulation and weak cricket administration from ICC .I still watch some games now and then but Cricket even during the T20 World Cup was extremely dull . Players seemed like going through the motions . There have been way too much commercialised cricket that it is losing its lustre.
Dragging in BCCI in these comments appears to be driven by Anti India sentiments and pure jealousy! Since 80% of the revenue gets generated by Indian Sponsorship and through Indian audience, it is quite natural that BCCI and Indian Cricket will have a lot of say in the world Cricket administration. Most sports are commercialized nowadays and Cricket cannot be an exception.
@@southcommercial69850:02
Totally agree bcci has ruined cricket
@@southcommercial6985 nope . That’s not true . I watch documentary of the 1983 World Cup with awe . I don’t hate Indian cricket but BCCI for its octopus tentacles 🦑actions regarding cricket administration. And even ICC .
@@southcommercial6985with due respect, BCCI is over pressurising ICC AND in turn the world cricket.
What a great cricket of that time. Mighty Haynes vs tiger waqar
U can't compare any bowler with Waqar. He was very quick. He bowled 100 mph consistently.
No he didn't
U are not talking about waqar,,I guess u are talking about shoaib akhtar
Look at the swing he is generating
Era of 90 most dangerous blower Waqar Younis
Waqar is the real sultan of swing
Both Wasim and Waqar had great competition against Haynes in early 90s
While Greenidge seriously struggled against Waqar on the 1990 tour.
Dont know what Haynes was complaining about?! A clear edge off the bat. Superb over by Waqar. Deserved wicket. Bowler won this contest, hands down.
Poetry in motion...His balls were spitting cobaras that no one even can come close!
In the early histroy, Haynes was a top 3 ODI player. Stats second to none. Viv was an anomaly. Zaheer played a very short time. Miandad and Dean Jones were the other greats.
Another Brilliant Upload Keep it up
Haynes given out caught behind off his shoulder 😮
No. Its off the bat. Slow down to 0.50 .it's very clear.
Waqar was lightning fast and accurate back then.
Waqar was a deadliest combination of pace, swing and accuracy in his peak years!
@@FF-en7ggWaqar was lightning for sure . But Shoaib was way quicker
But Shoiab's bowling action was questioned but there was no doubt about Waqar's bowling action .
@@shujahmohammed9173 No he is not. Shoaib doesn't have swing
@@shujahmohammed9173 way quicker? Not at all, Waqar lost pace after 1997-98 injury. Early 90s Waqar was as fast as prime Shoaib.
both greenidge and Haynes were at the end of their careers when Waqar started
but they were there because they felt they were competitive for international cricket
Are you mad? Haynes was retired in 94, five years after Waqar began his career. And he was still good enough to score couple of 💯s against Pakistani in 93 test series, & a 💯 in his last ODI against Australia in 94.
And Greenidge who was retired in 91 was also good enough to score a 200 in his 2nd last test series against Australia.
So, don't talk rubbish only bcoz you are envious of Pakistani bowlers, you can't belittle them by this nonsense!
@@FF-en7gg👏👏👏👏👏👏
Gem of Cricket
No mother can birth a child like waqar younus. I have heard rashid latief in ptv show of dr noman the guest was shoib Akhter and rashid latif said no bowler bowled like waqar in the history of cricket. I have seen thier spells that time we used to watch beginning and ending 15 overs due to double ws. Peoples buy ticket in black of front _screen pavilion end where waqar used to take run up that much beautiful run up he had. He is called death stood only 22 feet ahead. You can ask to england batsmen see interview of allan donald and many others what was the fear of borewala ecpress.
The best era of cricket
My inspiration ❤
Off the shoulder - so many howlers pre DRS.
Complete package the Bure wala express Waqar Younis
Bill lawry best commentators for australia
Haynes was way passed his best. Lucky to put bat to ball..
That brushed the sleeve on the arm. Would have been judged not out with the technology today
Extremely talented player. But he often suffered from injuries
You can watch it all day long..
Cricket at its best 🎉
Its clear out. first nick and then off the shoulder also. the last replay shows a clear nick with sound.
not out
Blind
And they are comparing Bumrah with these greats
Bumrah has a long way to travel, as an honest Indian I can say that.
@amitjain11000 that is true...I also admit that he is tracking well though. But in all honesty you can only measure how great someone is once they retire.
Actually, Burmah is the greatest bowler of the 21st century, and no other bowler I have seen can come close to him. He has all the qualities of a brilliant bowler.
@iam6412 then you clearly don't know much about Cricket. Dale Steyn is well ahead of Bumrah. Maybe in India he is the greatest ever but saying he is the best of the 21st century is a stretch. Leave it to Indians to propagate this exagerration
@@iam6412chutiyaa lorai now your talking absolute garbage!!!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Waqar bowling and swing
Bill lawry commentary
All things are right but D Haynes was not out.. 😂😂
what's the speed of the ball?
Came off his arm i have ths series on vhs
poor umpiring, lucky wicket, I hope at least one Pakistani can acknowledge the truth. great over by Waqar nonetheless.
How is it poor umpiring
@@mateen1979 Ball hit him above elbow of right hand. Umpire could not see that from his position, just saw ball deviate plus sound, so gave him out. Notice Haynes puts his right hand out and looks at it.
Yes u r right i saw in slow motion. But umpire had to judge with a speed of 150kph with no replay. Current law of referral has changed cricket
Pathetic decision....ruined an opportunity to witness hynes blitz... remember da match under miandad captaincy
Cheater
No cheaters were SRT & Dravid who are convicted in ball tempering, remembrance??? 🤭😛😜
what did he do?
@@GholamFareednothing
ALRA TV on UA-cam channel ❤
No mother can birth a child like waqar younus. I have heard rashid latief in ptv show of dr noman the guest was shoib Akhter and rashid latif said no bowler bowled like waqar in the history of cricket. I have seen thier spells that time we used to watch beginning and ending 15 overs due to double ws. Peoples buy ticket in black of front _screen pavilion end where waqar used to take run up that much beautiful run up he had. He is called death stood only 22 feet ahead. You can ask to england batsmen see interview of allan donald and many others what was the fear of borewala ecpress.
@@sadiqali265 Glad you’re so impressed, but he was one of many great fast bowlers. The West Indies had an entire galaxy in the same class.
Not out