I wasn't worrying at all about Midjourney replacing concept artists in the beginning, but did you see what their AI is doing right now? In just a short period of time, their AI improved from abstract and non-sensical paintings to complex and realistic art concepts. It seems like the evolution of AI is exponential. In a few months this tool (ChatGPT) will be much more advanced. Imagine in 5, 10 years.
There are a lot on limitations in the current implementation but it is quite clear that this is going to be a game changer in the long run. There is great potential here but also great dangers. Pros: Rewriting the same programs over and over will become a thing of the past. Standardization of common algorithms will reduce the general error rate and eliminate a lot of tedium. Complex tasks will be made more generally available. For example: Just as an artist doesn't need to know how to make brushes to paint, the artist would not need to know programming to create new tools for implementing their vision. Democratization of information could lead to a better educated public. Exploration of human knowledge and understanding could increase tremendously given good minds with free time and the curiosity to push the boundaries. (Curiosity is one of the few ways that we are still 'better'.) If we ask it nicely enough and carefully coax the embers, GAI could tell us how to create it. (let's bootstrap it.) Cons: A lot of people out of work. This is just a simple fact of life. Throughout human history jobs have come and gone. The socioeconomic turmoils regularly experienced by humanity speak more towards the way we interact than any particular technological advance. In the short term though it's definitely going to lead to suffering for many. When the world is forced to a single source of information there is an exponential risk of abuse. Namely that this gatekeeper source is used to directly influence public narrative and discourse. Additionally, absolute censorship (in the interest of of keeping 'the public' safe of course) creates a duel caste system in which there are those who are allowed to know and everyone else. Of course we already have this to some degree, but it's not as centralized and there's some occasional leakage to point out some of the nastier cases. You are more likely to believe something said in a friendly chat than looking at raw data, so accepting what may turn out to be BS comes far easier than it should. Democratization of information could lead to a worse educated public. 'Why do I have to learn any of this junk when the computer already knows all of it?' It's going to be used to come up with better ideas for crimes at least as much as coming up with better cake recipes. This isn't a comprehensive list by any means. Seems pretty apparent that turbulent times are ahead. In many ways this is simply a bigger hammer, but whether we use it to build a better house or smash each other's skulls is entirely up to us. We certainly need to discuss it now at the global scale before it's too late to do anything about it. Right now it feels a bit like we are seeing the smoke just before the Great and Terrible Oz appears.
ChatGPT is fantastic for learning new things without prior knowledge. I learned a few things about control systems :D Can't wait for models 4.0 and 5.0 if they ever happen to exist.
@@therealchicken7151 well not really, I tried working with both and co pilot is much better. You know co pilot is also made by openai if it was less then ChatGpt they would have used ChatGpt as the model for it, but they ain't.
22:05 See, what you do is is use text embedding and a web scraping api so when its own code is false, returns the correct syntax least. GPT aint doing no sudoku. Ive passed it one solved -1 block with getting wrong response still.
Now is a quite good time to think about what you could do instead of being in programmer. Because in 3-5 years you will be competing with fellow programmers/software engineers over the few remaining programming jobs out there which have not been replaced with ChatGPT 2.0. Just makes you wonder which alternative path to choose.
Machine learning is based of existing content and have no own opinions or is responsible for what it outputs. It is a much bigger problem that people is not educated what AI is or can do.
Most of people thinks this will replace all industries.. but as we can see - ChatGPT just answer you with potentially needed solution, that is just a percent of similarity, as any other AI... It returns something very similar for that you are looking for, but not for 100%, when the human make something exactly what you need... maybe little bit longer, but identical what you need. Actually, if companies will be want to replace humans with ChatGPT (or another AI)... anyway the company will be hire a human, that will be write queries for AI... It's kinda CNC lathe, or any metal or wood lathe...
I have cool idea for you. The idea is to create a voice assistant like Siri. But under the hood it uses ChatGPT to give *much* better answers. To build this you need 3 things: 1. Speech to Text (input) 2. ChatGPT conversational API (core) 3. Text to Speech (output)
I wasn't worrying at all about Midjourney replacing concept artists in the beginning, but did you see what their AI is doing right now? In just a short period of time, their AI improved from abstract and non-sensical paintings to complex and realistic art concepts. It seems like the evolution of AI is exponential. In a few months this tool (ChatGPT) will be much more advanced. Imagine in 5, 10 years.
There are a lot on limitations in the current implementation but it is quite clear that this is going to be a game changer in the long run.
There is great potential here but also great dangers.
Pros:
Rewriting the same programs over and over will become a thing of the past. Standardization of common algorithms will reduce the general error rate and eliminate a lot of tedium.
Complex tasks will be made more generally available. For example: Just as an artist doesn't need to know how to make brushes to paint, the artist would not need to know programming to create new tools for implementing their vision.
Democratization of information could lead to a better educated public.
Exploration of human knowledge and understanding could increase tremendously given good minds with free time and the curiosity to push the boundaries. (Curiosity is one of the few ways that we are still 'better'.)
If we ask it nicely enough and carefully coax the embers, GAI could tell us how to create it. (let's bootstrap it.)
Cons:
A lot of people out of work. This is just a simple fact of life. Throughout human history jobs have come and gone. The socioeconomic turmoils regularly experienced by humanity speak more towards the way we interact than any particular technological advance. In the short term though it's definitely going to lead to suffering for many.
When the world is forced to a single source of information there is an exponential risk of abuse. Namely that this gatekeeper source is used to directly influence public narrative and discourse. Additionally, absolute censorship (in the interest of of keeping 'the public' safe of course) creates a duel caste system in which there are those who are allowed to know and everyone else. Of course we already have this to some degree, but it's not as centralized and there's some occasional leakage to point out some of the nastier cases.
You are more likely to believe something said in a friendly chat than looking at raw data, so accepting what may turn out to be BS comes far easier than it should.
Democratization of information could lead to a worse educated public. 'Why do I have to learn any of this junk when the computer already knows all of it?'
It's going to be used to come up with better ideas for crimes at least as much as coming up with better cake recipes.
This isn't a comprehensive list by any means. Seems pretty apparent that turbulent times are ahead. In many ways this is simply a bigger hammer, but whether we use it to build a better house or smash each other's skulls is entirely up to us.
We certainly need to discuss it now at the global scale before it's too late to do anything about it. Right now it feels a bit like we are seeing the smoke just before the Great and Terrible Oz appears.
ChatGPT is fantastic for learning new things without prior knowledge. I learned a few things about control systems :D
Can't wait for models 4.0 and 5.0 if they ever happen to exist.
When you realise that a model that wasn’t even intended to be a Co pilot programmer does better than GitHub Copilot
In my experience github copilot gives better output
It doesn't, it is better at being understandable but it has 10x bugs.
@@achiyederi3622 Its way better at explaining code and finding possible reasaons for bugs
Fixing that little bug chatgpo has often is by telling it whats wrong 5x and thats t or its easy to fix since it explain detailed what it does/should
@@therealchicken7151 well not really, I tried working with both and co pilot is much better. You know co pilot is also made by openai if it was less then ChatGpt they would have used ChatGpt as the model for it, but they ain't.
Yeah it is quite good for boosting productivity used a lot for translating codes and etc
Programmer digging their own graves
its like doing knowledge transfer to the outsourced team.. more you prompt, the more you train it to replace you quicker
22:05 See, what you do is is use text embedding and a web scraping api so when its own code is false, returns the correct syntax least. GPT aint doing no sudoku. Ive passed it one solved -1 block with getting wrong response still.
i was just using ChatGPT. 😂 and i already got to know that it couldn't possibly replace human programmers. Atleast not YET!
I don't think it will replace us, but companies will definitely need less junior developers to write boilerplate code
Now is a quite good time to think about what you could do instead of being in programmer. Because in 3-5 years you will be competing with fellow programmers/software engineers over the few remaining programming jobs out there which have not been replaced with ChatGPT 2.0. Just makes you wonder which alternative path to choose.
Machine learning is based of existing content and have no own opinions or is responsible for what it outputs. It is a much bigger problem that people is not educated what AI is or can do.
Traids Jobs like Electricians or Plumbers could be good options
Also a very philosophical question as to what else will be possible in the future :)
do you think GPT is good to find beginner error?
Remember that there will be many more updates to come 😱
Most of people thinks this will replace all industries.. but as we can see - ChatGPT just answer you with potentially needed solution, that is just a percent of similarity, as any other AI... It returns something very similar for that you are looking for, but not for 100%, when the human make something exactly what you need... maybe little bit longer, but identical what you need.
Actually, if companies will be want to replace humans with ChatGPT (or another AI)... anyway the company will be hire a human, that will be write queries for AI... It's kinda CNC lathe, or any metal or wood lathe...
looks like Tims
older brother
I have cool idea for you.
The idea is to create a voice assistant like Siri.
But under the hood it uses ChatGPT to give *much* better answers.
To build this you need 3 things:
1. Speech to Text (input)
2. ChatGPT conversational API (core)
3. Text to Speech (output)
I do think that future AI GPT Models will replace many Office Jobs.
Maybe not now, but definetly in the next 10 years!!!
Giving it Internet access would be cool. Now I ask my search engine queries to ChatGPT and it gives exact answers. (not a list of websites)
Every time I see a title or a thumbnail like "ChatGPT will take your job" I immediately click in "Don't recommend channel"
IRESUMI
You just hide your head in the sand.
And then you will act all surprised when these GPT AI models will actually replace your job.
@@limitless1692 I don't think so, I have two jobs, one as an artist, and as a part time job, guess what? I make machine learning models
Make a video about chat gpt wont replace programmers❌
Make a video about how to replace neural nine✅
Thx_.
Scary
never! but bot that ask questions will xD
🥜🌰
First
second
The title of this video evokes a highly problematic saying, you should consider changing it…
It’s pathetic how America’s greed is impacting people of great skill and thinking
this is all china / isreal
@@flethacker actually it’s more america
Israel is just a petty murderer who cowers behind such technology
ShitGpt