Starship Flight To Mars

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
  • A "Somewhat" accurate animation of Starship's eventual flight to Mars. Things will most likely change before Starship goes to Mars, so I just designed it off what SN20 will look like. Obviously SN20 will not be the starship making the journey to Mars. I took a lot of the criticism I got on my Starship SN11 video to make this more accurate and better. Still not completely accurate, but I wanted to get this video out as soon as I could. I also took some artistic liberties in some scenes because I thought it looked cool. (I like the old flap design better)
    I also wanted to thank everyone that is seeing this and everyone who watched my last video for the overwhelming support, it really encourages me to make better art for you all.
    Patreon: www.patreon.co...
    (Working on getting more stuff on there soon)
    If you want to check out some of my other work here are the link to some of my websites:
    Instagram: / evan.k.collection
    Shop: fineartamerica...
    Digital Photo Class Website: evankcollectio...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 304

  • @jacksmith792
    @jacksmith792 3 роки тому +92

    This dude needs more subscribers for how hard he works on these videos!

  • @colinjames8682
    @colinjames8682 3 роки тому +16

    This animation is fucking incredible. A perfect representation of what the updated process is expected to look like

  • @drpork1360
    @drpork1360 3 роки тому +45

    I can't wait to see starship in space with a full crew, that's the day I'll actually cry over it. Every time I see starship fly I shed a tear.

    • @mcnuget2967
      @mcnuget2967 3 роки тому +1

      @@sonacphotos no

    • @drpork1360
      @drpork1360 3 роки тому +6

      @@sonacphotos 100 people compared to hundreds of thousands of people supporting starship isn't anything, I will let you see how wrong you are in 2024. Go back to your discord and hate on Space X there.

    • @Heap_InnovatorsRBLX
      @Heap_InnovatorsRBLX 3 роки тому

      @@sonacphotos do you mean the starship orbital test flight? Is that the one you talking about?

    • @derpydude6570
      @derpydude6570 3 роки тому +1

      @@sonacphotos SLS isn’t a cheap thing to launch, wouldn’t be easy in the long run, and SpaceX already said they won’t be using falcon heavy for Human spaceflight.

    • @filip9564
      @filip9564 3 роки тому

      @@sonacphotos abort systems sucks. They have only helped like 2-4 times. They have lead to multiple rovkets exploding because the system activated when it wasnt supoded to and killed the crew.

  • @dhpstudios2009
    @dhpstudios2009 3 роки тому +81

    They have to hurry to make a concrete floor on Mars, Elon is coming 🤣

    • @eazy1726
      @eazy1726 3 роки тому

      The area that they are going to land on is planned so starship wouldn't be destroyed

    • @jesnoggle13
      @jesnoggle13 3 роки тому

      No it’s called desert pavement. A dry lake bed.

  • @RunningRunner46
    @RunningRunner46 3 роки тому +121

    Thank you elon musk, after this, flat earthers will be gone forever

    • @zaidahmed5464
      @zaidahmed5464 3 роки тому +55

      flat mars society will be formed

    • @willlathrop9502
      @willlathrop9502 3 роки тому +15

      They will find a way to object it, just you watch

    • @mr.ditkovich6379
      @mr.ditkovich6379 3 роки тому +7

      I don't think so, thousands of rockets have already been sent to space and there's even more flat earthers now than before

    • @BartlettDaveJr
      @BartlettDaveJr 3 роки тому +2

      Flat earth is acyapsyop

    • @theallknowingorbitalteapot1010
      @theallknowingorbitalteapot1010 3 роки тому +6

      There will always be people with negative intellect it's inescapable, unfortunately

  • @santoniou
    @santoniou 3 роки тому +11

    If they ever do this for real i'm gonna lose my mind, this would be one of the coolest things to see in history, especially catching the superheavy.

    • @mr.ditkovich6379
      @mr.ditkovich6379 3 роки тому +1

      That's the point of the video, showing you how it will look like in the next year

    • @zacharywindover9840
      @zacharywindover9840 3 роки тому

      @@mr.ditkovich6379 I doubt it’ll be achieved within the next year, but I don’t doubt it will happen within the next decade.

  • @magamike1800
    @magamike1800 3 роки тому +12

    208 subs WTF? One of the coolest things i have ever seen. Keep it up.

  • @livingexcuse3767
    @livingexcuse3767 3 роки тому +12

    Watched this video and just subscribed, very underrated for this type of quality, good video!

    • @justglenn1037
      @justglenn1037 3 роки тому +2

      Agreed. The animation aids the average person unfamiliar with the mechanisms of human space flight.

  • @BookGuy1
    @BookGuy1 3 роки тому +7

    In other news, pig start flying in almost everywhere.
    Great animation 👍

  • @sichoneamon5299
    @sichoneamon5299 3 роки тому +8

    Optimistic! Mars in view 👀👀👌

  • @thenativemartian5169
    @thenativemartian5169 3 роки тому +2

    Huh I never knew that starship was powered by sparklers. Jk dude the rest of the animation was beautiful. Good job

  • @derekcharleslovell
    @derekcharleslovell 3 роки тому +1

    brilliant idea, go for it Mr musk.

  • @Tulin258
    @Tulin258 3 роки тому

    I like how their is a starship test vehicle next to the full starship, like the star hopper on the test launches

  • @BobbyCoggins
    @BobbyCoggins 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing!!!! THank you for your hard work on this!

  • @Kallefar90
    @Kallefar90 3 роки тому +2

    Fantastic work!

  • @RSCB
    @RSCB 3 роки тому +1

    This dude needs for subscribers he is good at this

  • @calebgangte1228
    @calebgangte1228 3 роки тому

    The animation was smooth af

  • @manmahendrasgh
    @manmahendrasgh 3 роки тому +1

    That's some really good animation

  • @starshipcaptain4753
    @starshipcaptain4753 3 роки тому +1

    I love all of it, beautifully done. 2 things: Ring looks too small of tolerance to capture Starship and landing on Mars will require a much more stabilizing landing system like Falcon 9.

  • @koringa5859
    @koringa5859 3 роки тому

    Great animation. This is coming soon

  • @jarrydhansen3764
    @jarrydhansen3764 3 роки тому

    Literally made me cry🥺😭

  • @ligerfelikscayanga7361
    @ligerfelikscayanga7361 3 роки тому +1

    You really don't deserve the comments those ignorant people said in the Sn11 video. I bet they cant even make atleast 3 seconds of animation shown here. This is high quality animation that looks like what SpaceX would use.

  • @zaroflamedyt2334
    @zaroflamedyt2334 3 роки тому

    the music fits perfectly.

  • @-MsM
    @-MsM 3 роки тому +1

    Very cool 😎

  • @johncharles236
    @johncharles236 3 роки тому

    You got my subscription for this one. Great video, man!

  • @tirthachakrabarti5912
    @tirthachakrabarti5912 3 роки тому

    Beautifully done!

  • @uichanseo5210
    @uichanseo5210 3 роки тому

    This is awesome

  • @jarichards99utube
    @jarichards99utube 3 роки тому

    Very COOL Video : )

  • @BamTehBrent
    @BamTehBrent 3 роки тому

    Amazing work

  • @nathanmyles1
    @nathanmyles1 3 роки тому

    It will be crazy

  • @DeryckThompsonChasingtheDream
    @DeryckThompsonChasingtheDream 3 роки тому

    Just like that. Brilliant

  • @chrismclaughlin7956
    @chrismclaughlin7956 3 роки тому

    Excellent video, keep up the good work.

  • @danniles5256
    @danniles5256 3 роки тому

    Great video.Thanks.

  • @millimetreperfect
    @millimetreperfect 3 роки тому +1

    I hope that area is 100% firm and level, otherwise it could be embarrassing. Great animation btw.

    • @aqeelraja4750
      @aqeelraja4750 3 роки тому +1

      Orbiters can track the surface on Mars and locate areas that can support the 9 metres of circumference that starship will have. Plus the legs will need to handle weight, and levelling terrain.

    • @johndododoe1411
      @johndododoe1411 3 роки тому +1

      @@aqeelraja4750 I'm guessing the first unmanned mission will include a robotic surface paving machine and the second mission will carry the methane factory to fuel return trips. Once those return they know the support infrastructure on Mars works and can send the first astronauts to found the colony and build a house for the Musk family.

    • @aqeelraja4750
      @aqeelraja4750 3 роки тому +1

      @@johndododoe1411 Elon or anyone who’s not an astronaut won’t move to Mars for a while. Indeed I think that Cargo ships carrying solar panels, machinery to pave the Martian surface/create structures, fuel etc. But the first ppl to Mars will focus on setting up the base, laying out the solar panels, habitation and research based science. Building houses won’t be a priority until cargo/power/food is sustainable enough to handle all of those ppl. Only then can ppl come over including musk.

    • @KeepItReal2024
      @KeepItReal2024 3 роки тому

      They wouldn't build it there if the ground isn't stable........get real.

    • @johndododoe1411
      @johndododoe1411 3 роки тому

      @@KeepItReal2024 It's not about stability. It's about being soil/sand/grabble, not a paved landing pad. Very similar to the ground in Texas where they actually built the current landing pad.

  • @goldenbacon1888
    @goldenbacon1888 3 роки тому

    Nice animation, this is the plan hopefully we can see this in action in 5-10 years!

  • @satos1
    @satos1 3 роки тому +5

    Great work. Need to speak to Elon for a job as you deserve it for all your hard work that you have put into this animation video,

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому +4

      Hopefully one day I'll make it there, im not gonna major in aerospace engineering for nothing

    • @calebgangte1228
      @calebgangte1228 3 роки тому

      @@EvanKaren your majoring in aerospace? Good luck!!

  • @CGeoC
    @CGeoC 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome animation, great work!
    Although SN20 is supposed to be the first orbital test flight for starship, most likely using BN3.
    Orbital refueller varients of the starship will also most likely need to be launched with one of the boosters after BN3 - meaning either a long delay in testing, or the refuellers will come after SN20.
    I don't think SN20 will be doing the full flight to Mars, but one of the next few after will try it I'm sure.

  • @OwnedBucketTheBucketMan
    @OwnedBucketTheBucketMan 3 роки тому

    Really cool. Nice work!

  • @prithvimanb
    @prithvimanb 3 роки тому

    that was just awesome ...

  • @camerondeatcher9668
    @camerondeatcher9668 3 роки тому

    Impressive skills!

  • @jasonsaj.3
    @jasonsaj.3 3 роки тому +1

    More like SN40!! Anyway, nice job on this!

    • @TheBest14184
      @TheBest14184 3 роки тому

      The won’t even be called “SN” by that time. It’ll probably be more like the falcons I guess

  • @vladgaltsev5244
    @vladgaltsev5244 3 роки тому

    Keep it up, looks awesome

  • @SparePlayss
    @SparePlayss 3 роки тому

    Deserves million views :)

  • @nzredwolf4048
    @nzredwolf4048 3 роки тому

    i doubt that the first starship to head to mars will be as early as SN20, but apart from that, a reeeeeeaaaaalllly good animation!!

    • @Seba_World
      @Seba_World 3 роки тому

      If SN11 lands successfully tommorow (29.03.2021) SN20+BN3 will reach LEO in 3 months and SN30 lands on Mars in 2-3 years. SN20 for sure will not be the 1 going to Mars. What about landing on Moon before Mars?

  • @konolda3213
    @konolda3213 3 роки тому

    Imagine when already 1000 astronauts has been send to Mars and elon comes to visit in his custom starship design 😳

  • @stephenmac3105
    @stephenmac3105 3 роки тому

    It was the music that did it for me

  • @jjoey.s
    @jjoey.s 3 роки тому

    Love the ending!

  • @a526003b
    @a526003b 3 роки тому +1

    Great work! Need to add the solar panels for the trip to Mars and the dust upon landing but I’m being very picky lol. 👍🏻

    • @freetrailer4poor
      @freetrailer4poor 3 роки тому

      They most likely will have no solar panels and the landing site most likely will be cemented.

  • @derekbirmingham9534
    @derekbirmingham9534 3 роки тому +10

    That's SN20. So if were on SN10 right now, that means we've got 10 more to got

    • @scifigames3272
      @scifigames3272 3 роки тому +8

      nah, sn12-14 has been scrapped and recently sn18 and 19 have also been scrapped. That means only 11,15,16,17 and then 20, only 5 more starships until we reach orbit, won't land on mars tho only orbit

    • @JDHunterG
      @JDHunterG 3 роки тому

      @@scifigames3272 later Prototypes on mars

    • @scifigames3272
      @scifigames3272 3 роки тому

      ​@@JDHunterG Ye, but lets see if it at least can reach orbit, anything can happen!

    • @dalisoula
      @dalisoula 3 роки тому +3

      @@scifigames3272 no confirmation yet for 18 & 19 being scrapped

    • @zaroflamedyt2334
      @zaroflamedyt2334 3 роки тому

      @ Sci Fi Games So this means 5 or 7.

  • @nerdtronaut
    @nerdtronaut 3 роки тому +2

    Wow!

  • @grzegorzpiesik1781
    @grzegorzpiesik1781 3 роки тому +3

    It is a fantastic animation,
    But as you can see the grid fin at 1:19 cleary folds right before landing.Is that a mistake or intentional

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому +1

      It's all speculation at this point, I made it so that it catches the booster with 3 fins, but now that I'm thinking about it, they'll probably catch with 4

  • @w1lbur_381
    @w1lbur_381 3 роки тому

    I love living in a real world because this will happen 100% mhm starship is a great concept with no flaws.

  • @Alfawakhry
    @Alfawakhry 3 роки тому

    this is so good . good job bro

  • @anongus88
    @anongus88 3 роки тому

    Amazing video, I love u

  • @jmpmanaj2329
    @jmpmanaj2329 3 роки тому

    Superheavy: I dont need Refurbisment. I need Fast Turnaround Time.

  • @danielcraft15
    @danielcraft15 3 роки тому +3

    Why is the 1st ship being refuled when only the superheavy booster used up fuel? Is there something im missing?

    • @nilsmeier9399
      @nilsmeier9399 3 роки тому

      The starship will use a lot of fuel to get to a geostationary transfer orbit. It just wasn't shown in the video.

    • @danielcraft15
      @danielcraft15 3 роки тому +1

      @@nilsmeier9399 isnt it the superheavy doing all the thrust?

    • @Blubb5000
      @Blubb5000 3 роки тому

      Because it’s all just a fantasy, which will never come true.

    • @nilsmeier9399
      @nilsmeier9399 3 роки тому

      @@danielcraft15 No. Super heavy is only suborbital. That's why they can land it without a flip. Starship will have to use its own engines to get to an orbit.
      The problem with re-entry is not height but horizontal speed. Superheavy will lift the starship out of the thick parts of the atmosphere and then return home. But to stay in space, starship has to move horizontal really fast. And starship has to do that by it self.

    • @nilsmeier9399
      @nilsmeier9399 3 роки тому

      @@Blubb5000 Like what part is a fantasy? The rocket itself? The flip Maneuver? Or orbit refueling?
      What is just a fantasy?
      And please explain why 🤔

  • @danielgranath2348
    @danielgranath2348 3 роки тому

    Very nice. You have put alot of work into this, and it is Great! (but the moon is too big😜) keep doing videos like this and you will have alot of views and subscribers. I'll subscribe👍.

  • @stephrinker5154
    @stephrinker5154 3 роки тому

    starship transonic flight to Los Angeles in 30ty minutes, yeaaaaahh////////////

  • @dangerous_ngga
    @dangerous_ngga 3 роки тому

    EPIC !..

  • @sonnyburnett8725
    @sonnyburnett8725 3 роки тому

    Great video with awesome clarity but have to say the launches will most likely be at sea.

  • @kevinsmith3824
    @kevinsmith3824 3 роки тому

    i think this is a good idea

  • @RogerM88
    @RogerM88 3 роки тому +2

    Nice work. You need to add bigger landing legs to the Starship, and way more dust at the landing on Mars.

    • @freetrailer4poor
      @freetrailer4poor 3 роки тому

      At Mars they will add cement to landing site, there will be no dust.

  • @muhammadrivandra5065
    @muhammadrivandra5065 3 роки тому

    Subscribed brother

  • @Kasmuller
    @Kasmuller 3 роки тому

    Try using meshes or smoke simulations for the plumes instead of particles.

  • @Ligulistylis
    @Ligulistylis 3 роки тому

    One-vid subscribe, easy choice! Nice work

  • @adityalabde1647
    @adityalabde1647 3 роки тому +5

    do you use blender if yes so please teach me

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому +5

      Yes, I do use blender, im planning on making a tutorial of how to make animations like this one soon

    • @adityalabde1647
      @adityalabde1647 3 роки тому +2

      @@EvanKaren Ok thanks for your reply

    • @Zamoc323
      @Zamoc323 3 роки тому

      @@EvanKaren hi Evan, me too, I want to make a starship like real starship, I use blender and I want to make a tutorial but I think you are better than me in blender hahah (I speak Spanish, so excuse me for my mistakes writing xd)

    • @corbin5659
      @corbin5659 3 роки тому

      @@EvanKaren You should. You're good at it.

  • @adityalabde1647
    @adityalabde1647 3 роки тому

    what a animation

  • @franciscoroberto7042
    @franciscoroberto7042 3 роки тому

    I love Muskis fireball!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Seba_World
    @Seba_World 3 роки тому

    If SN11 lands successfully tommorow (29.03.2021) SN20+BN3 reach LEO in 3 months and SN30 lands on Mars in 2-3 years.

  • @richard0934
    @richard0934 3 роки тому

    Cant wait :)

  • @mrpicky1868
    @mrpicky1868 3 роки тому

    i highly doubt catch scenario at all but if it will be implemented ,catch device will have to also move around . most likely it will be a moving pad with holes in it. but just bigger legs still more likely

    • @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
      @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV 3 роки тому +1

      Keep in mind the booster catch scenario is for an ocean platform...
      The idea being to catch it over the water, so if engines fail, it hits deep water, not a platform full of rocket fuel... :)

    • @mrpicky1868
      @mrpicky1868 3 роки тому

      @@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV platform is also expensive and in some sens even harder to repair) hitting water at speed is just like hitting ground

    • @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
      @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV 3 роки тому +1

      @@mrpicky1868
      Hitting the water or ground is fine, as long as it isn't hitting the launch platform it isn't a huge loss.... :)
      The water won't be soft, but it will be a fire suppressant..

    • @mrpicky1868
      @mrpicky1868 3 роки тому

      @@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV the actual fire of fuel are never the problem. the speed hit and explosion is

    • @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
      @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV 3 роки тому

      ​@@mrpicky1868 Exactly, you don't want the explosion on the platform where space ships are sitting...
      Armouring one side of the platform and tower isn't too tricky..
      The speed should really be manageable by the time it's that low, if not, the boosters computer should note the error and fly it away from the platform...
      But yes, if a booster comes in like a bullet, it would be trouble no matter where it lands!! :)

  • @iangahan5584
    @iangahan5584 3 роки тому

    So cool looking nice job 👍

  • @interrogation7417
    @interrogation7417 3 роки тому

    Again awsome mate ? Can i use some of part of this video in Our UA-cam videos ? It has around 3k subscriber's😇

  • @markhbeardsley5102
    @markhbeardsley5102 2 роки тому

    Once SpaceX gets to the point where they can refuel in orbit, all sorts of possibilities become much more likely. Forget shielding radiation out by using lead, how about having torus shaped water tanks that not only shield out radiation, they keep the gardens watered and the microgravity showers flowing! LOL!
    The one aspect of reducing the cost of getting each pound to LEO that fascinates me is that maybe relatively soon we can have Aldrin Cyclers that are big enough that they can have sections that spin with partial G levels (0.1G to perhaps 0.25G?) in the outer portions. Hard to combine the water tanks with the spinning for gravity though... Maybe have the sleeping quarters/solar storm refuge in the center and the work and bathing areas in the outer rings at 0.15G or so. I wonder what the physical strength loss issues associated with microgravity would be like in 0.1G or 0.2G?

  • @superfoot5374
    @superfoot5374 3 роки тому

    EPIC animations. liked and sub.

  • @Surrenitie
    @Surrenitie 3 роки тому +1

    *Puts on tinfoil hat* guys, you can see the edge of the set! 2:45

  • @stormchaserjacobcook
    @stormchaserjacobcook 3 роки тому

    Amazing render!!!

  • @Tatebilericycricket
    @Tatebilericycricket 3 роки тому

    Nice musk envelopes

  • @freetrailer4poor
    @freetrailer4poor 3 роки тому

    You make that? awesome. What you use. povray?

  • @ricardomilos3464
    @ricardomilos3464 3 роки тому +4

    I think starship should be used to bring up large amounts of cargo to a much larger spaceship, and then that spaceship leaves orbit, with ONE starship on board, it reaches Mars, starship makes multiple trips up and down from Mars orbit, delivering 1000s of tons of cargo, and then the starship and the spaceship return to earth. It would be a much more efficient use of starship's reusability. I think you should do an animation of that, because no one else has.

    • @theluftwaffle1
      @theluftwaffle1 3 роки тому +1

      Problem is how would we build this starship carrier? We don’t have the orbital infrastructure to build something starship size, much less larger.

    • @ricardomilos3464
      @ricardomilos3464 3 роки тому

      Elon musk wants his starship to be capable of daily reuse. Starship could take 100 tons of this spaceship into orbit per DAY. Give it a few months, and Building a spaceship 50 times as big as starship would be quite feasible.

    • @ricardomilos3464
      @ricardomilos3464 3 роки тому

      @@theluftwaffle1 Elon musk wants starship to be capable of daily reuse. Starship could take 100 tons of this spaceship into orbit per DAY. give it a few months, and building a spaceship 50x as big as starship would be quite feasible.

    • @3gunslingers
      @3gunslingers 3 роки тому

      @@ricardomilos3464
      Why should SpaceX chose the more expensive way?
      Building a few more Starships is orders of magnitude cheaper than designing, building, shipping he elements to orbit constructing and flying a HUGE spaceship.
      Same goes for the MarsDirect 1 to n-th plan. A small Starship variant is way more expensive than just building a few more bigger ones. Sure, the pure operation _might_ be a tad cheaper, but not the overall mission.

    • @ricardomilos3464
      @ricardomilos3464 3 роки тому

      @@3gunslingers the goal isn't just to get people to Mars, it's to get large numbers of people to Mars. Think about it like this:
      Use of starship over 2 years with current plan: launch with 100 passengers and 100 tons of cargo, drift through space for 6 months, land, stay for a while, until next launch window, fly back, land on earth, and launch again. That's not very much engine running time over 2 years for starship when it's selling point is to be rapidly reused.
      Use of starship over 2 years with my plan. Launch every day for 1-3 months to build a mammoth spaceship, 3 more months of launches to bring up, perhaps, 1000 passengers, and 10,000 tons of cargo. Starship docks to the giant spaceship, has it's downtime for 6 months, while docked to the spaceship, drifting through space. (or perhaps 1-2 months, depending on whether the spaceship uses nuclear or not) it reaches Mars, lands cargo, refuels on mars, flies back to Mars orbit, lands more cargo (on mars), refuels, flies back into Martian orbit, lands more cargo... it does this, perhaps 100 times. After delivering the last of the cargo on the Martian surface, starship docks with the spaceship, (perhaps the two years are up by then) then the spaceship and starship fly back to Earth.
      Plan 1 has the starship deliver 100 passengers and 100 tons of cargo, in the same time that it takes plan 2 to deliver 1,000 passengers, and 10,000 tons of cargo, simply because plan 2 increases the % of time starship is actually firing it's engines during a mission 100x. That's because of reusability, that is being utilized, that is not being utilized in plan 1.
      But won't building a spaceship be rediculously expensive? This spaceship would be far cheaper, pound for pound, and also even more so cubic foot for cubic foot, than starship. The engines in an interplanetary starship could be far less powerful than those on a rocket launching from earth, because the spaceship doesn't need to fight earth gravity. It could accelerate at .1 g, thus needing engines no more powerful than starship, despite being many times larger. It would certainly need more fuel, though, don't get me wrong. But the engines could be tiny. It would also be larger, by far, than the starship, for the amount it weighs, because of smaller engines, but also, it wouldn't need to be designed to handle the stresses of atmospheric reentry. It wouldn't need a heat shield, and instead of stainless steel, the spaceship could be made of aluminum. The spaceship could also go a lot faster than the starship, because it could very reasonably use nuclear engines, as opposed to starship, since nuclear engines are too heavy for liftoff.

  • @AMZG
    @AMZG 3 роки тому

    that fire animation is rough.

  • @trygveskaran764
    @trygveskaran764 3 роки тому +1

    Love the animation, you probably already know this, but sn20 will not go to mars. Instead it will ride on bn3 to orbit, which is a huge milestone.

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому +2

      yes, I know Sn20 wont make the flight to Mars, however because SpaceX changes their design so fast the starship that does make the flight to mars wont look the same as the current version, so this is an interpretation of what it would look like if the Sn20 version would be the one to make the journey.

    • @trygveskaran764
      @trygveskaran764 3 роки тому

      @@EvanKaren ah, I understand

  • @ESA_XSA
    @ESA_XSA 3 роки тому

    Hey this is awesome i hope i can ride this water tank to space but i need to ride a centrifudge First
    Btw are you need to ride a centrifudge to take a vacation on mars??

  • @nieznanyx
    @nieznanyx 3 роки тому

    wheres the explosion at the end?

  • @marcoferrari4285
    @marcoferrari4285 3 роки тому

    so sad that italian news never talk about it. it's a shame

  • @sureshbadadani5698
    @sureshbadadani5698 3 роки тому

    🔥🔥🔥osm

  • @kiwigurn6328
    @kiwigurn6328 3 роки тому +3

    Love .I think more likely moon, but hay: power of Time to Elon^2 could happen

  • @slavtrooper3851
    @slavtrooper3851 3 роки тому

    remember the legs, elon said the legs is scheduled, but the catch is the plan-b

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому

      When they eventually get to flying to Mars, I expect by then they will have implemented the catch method

  • @MrKentaroMotoPI
    @MrKentaroMotoPI 3 роки тому

    He forgot the dead, burned bodies raining down.

  • @StephenBoyd21
    @StephenBoyd21 3 роки тому

    So we are only 9 SN’s away from oink to Mars? I’d de delighted if SN20 got into orbit.

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому +1

      Not really, SN20 won't accually go to Mars, its just the starship I modeled the one in the video off of. Probably be something like SN50 before we see a starship go to Mars

    • @3gunslingers
      @3gunslingers 3 роки тому

      If SN20 actually goes to orbit as Musk aims to do, then we are only 7 Starships away. SN12 to 14 got deleted already.

  • @HolaACchillin
    @HolaACchillin 3 роки тому

    Legit!

  • @mjw907
    @mjw907 3 роки тому

    where is the power production and radiators

  • @nemvus_
    @nemvus_ 3 роки тому

    great job! the flip maneuver was a bit too wild lol, but otherwise a nice rendering. :)

  • @coul
    @coul 3 роки тому +2

    Why does the Starship need refueling if it hasn't gone anywhere?

    • @scottmclennan6114
      @scottmclennan6114 3 роки тому

      Wouldn’t they launch it empty to save weight, and then fuel it up?

    • @coul
      @coul 3 роки тому

      @@scottmclennan6114 So they send 2 Starships up, one tanker with fuel, and one crew that's empty then transfer the fuel? Will the booster not be powerful enough to get the fuel and crew out of the atmosphere? There's a piece to this I'm missing, but I'm obviously not all that smart...

    • @scottmclennan6114
      @scottmclennan6114 3 роки тому

      @@coul maybe I’m missing it too mate!! I thought it would be cheaper to send the first starship up empty because it’s an easier load for that booster. Maybe I missed something.

    • @QueerAssociation
      @QueerAssociation 3 роки тому

      They need to burn the engines to go fast enough to orbit, about 27,000 miles per hour and they need to refuel it so it has a full tank when leaving earths orbit

    • @coul
      @coul 3 роки тому +1

      @@QueerAssociation That makes sense. Thanks.

  • @3denym860
    @3denym860 3 роки тому +1

    Add more dust plume when landing on mars

    • @airgunningyup
      @airgunningyup 3 роки тому

      yea , the dust plume from a starship would be 1/2 mile in all directions im sure.

  • @lucasmuellersc
    @lucasmuellersc 3 роки тому

    Didn’t they say that starship won’t bellyflop on mars? I swear I remember them saying that. Idk I hear shit sometimes

  • @cpcpu6007
    @cpcpu6007 3 роки тому

    So if there's airplane mode. What do you call it when you're in a starship on your way to mars? Does the space attendant say ensure your phone is in Rocket mode?

    • @EvanKaren
      @EvanKaren  3 роки тому

      They make you Elon-gate your phone

  • @Chestergaming76
    @Chestergaming76 Рік тому

    Is this ksp or simplerockets 2

  • @fabioferreiragomes
    @fabioferreiragomes 3 роки тому

    ........INCRÍVEL..........ESPETACULAR............

  • @k-aerospace
    @k-aerospace 3 роки тому

    Starship won't just need a single refuel in orbit though, more like 8-12