I would like to know why Chinese soldiers in WWII seemed to frequently run out of ammo. Was there not enough manufacturing facility to produce the ammo? Was there not enough logistics to transport the ammo from the rear to the front? Did Japanese have better mobility and were able to surround Chinese force and cut off the supply?
This is understandable that only rifles that chamber 8mm Mauser ammo were the most acceptable rifles for China in that period of time. China had facility to produce 8mm ammo; obviously China needed to stick with rifles that use 8mm ammo. This leaves with Mauser 98 and Hanyang 88 rifles as the possible choice. The striper clips used in Mauser 98 rifles are obviously better than the enbloc clips used in Hanyang 88 rifles. If an enbloc clip was not manufactured up to the spec or was dented during handling (the enbloc clip was made from thin/soft metal), the soldier would have a hard time inserting the enblock into the rifle or chambering a round. Too much at stake to depend on that thin piece of soft metal. Therefore, I agree that Mauser 98 rifle was the logical choice. As for whether full length Mauser 98 rifle is better, or shorter length Mauser 98K rifle is better, I don't know. Seem like they both have pros and cons. I guess that depends on how much bayoneting that the soldiers were expected to engage in.
@@petershen6924 Yes, you are likely to be correct. I have seen many pictures from that era. Seem like all are using extra long bayonets regardless if they use short rifle like 98K or long rifle like Hanyang 88. Having said this, I am not sure if Chinese soldiers at that time were fit for engaging in bayoneting. Most Chinese soldiers seemed like very thin and way-too-young -- like kids. The bayonet was most likely for psychological benefit just in case they ran out of ammo. Running out of ammo seemed like a frequently happened problem.
@@captainjayc9217 they were not even trained for bayonet combat. That is why Taiwan is so strict on bayonet drill in their military training to this day.
大爱98k，不瞒说，十多年的梦想，最近终于实现了。射击体验很好，后座没有预期大，可能是枪重。80岁的枪，准头还不错。虽然历经沧桑，仍可感受其做工精良。特别享受拉拴推弹和抛壳的快感。不过它可能更适合收藏而不是打仗，甚至都不适合打猎，因为它太精密，太重。特别是对比了SKS和56半后。
感觉德国人考虑过多了，刺刀对枪管共振影响。。。其实用刺刀的时候都是近距离冲锋了，也影响不了多远的射程。 不浮动的枪托其实影响也很大。。。
很优质的内容 加油啊老哥
感谢支持
兩個星期終於等到了
既然以后要多讲98，有机会能不能讲解，比较一下K98AZ 的·small ring 和M24, M48 intermediate action与传统98的不同。 多谢又做出一期好视频。
会的会的。没有FN24，有些遗憾。。。
@@zavod.fiftyseven FN24在加拿大还没看到过，只有dealer卖husqvarna用FN提供的action生产的民用版96和98. 去年“土鸡改”同志客串的汉阳造不也是很成功吗，请M24， M48顶个场子，兄弟们都会理解的。
感谢理解
12:02 这个击针的复进弹簧卡榫前端被削成了一个斜坡状装置，我猜测这个玩意儿应该是个保险装置。之前我一直有个问题，就是当扳机被按住时，此时击针和击锤能自由活动，然后假设快速向前推动枪栓，那么击锤和击针会不会因为惯性向前冲进而撞到底火击发（尚未完成闭锁的）子弹？后来我看了一个动画，发现枪栓里有一个和这个斜面装置相吻合的斜槽，所以我猜测这东西是这么工作的：当前后拉动枪栓时，击针斜面的刀锋和斜槽垂直，导致击针插不进斜槽，也就够不到子弹底火，当旋转枪栓完成闭锁后，击针斜面刀锋与枪栓斜槽平行，击针向前能插进斜槽就能够到子弹了。但是我没有98k所以没办法验证全是瞎猜😂
是的。C&Rsenal这集提到ua-cam.com/video/TEBnXIqCJu8/v-deo.html
@@zavod.fiftyseven 谢谢博主🙏
新手入坑.我看大佬给步枪上油，拆卸保养，有没有什么工具和油推荐用的？最近打算一次买齐了，准备开始保健. P.S 没有gun vise应该也能拆吧？
不需要gun vise。建议买特制Gunsmith螺丝刀。普通的螺丝刀容易损伤螺丝。老枪的话来点Ballistol，擦枪管用Hoppes No9.
@@zavod.fiftyseven 擦枪管除了hoppes，还有没有别的什么CLP推荐一下？主持人有没有计划讲303/春田/瑞士直拉式？
其他的我没用过。有英美瑞士系的计划@@Sleepycroc1204
我个人觉得德国枪公差笑，各个零件严丝合缝，我的98k 栓子是战争后期的，泄气口形状不一样。我去买了个战争初期的，也是cod 42 waffen stamp 655 的毛瑟栓子但是抛壳勾 太紧栓子弄不进去，我拿了个锉刀把抛壳勾磨了一块才装进去
他们的产品太精密，不好仿造
我有捷克造的98k（以色列购买后改成7.62北约弹），很多零件跟原版98k的标准规格相差很多。似乎是来自Vz24。
后期的98k也做了些改动
我搞了把45年k98，末期一言难尽，没有那个卡槽，不能躺反着上弹，内部有锈，我也不敢挫，也就能当重演装备了
@@petershen6924 我一直想搞把以色列7.62的，千刀价格一直没下手
终于看到播主搞到79圆头弹了。
这枪现在也少见了，98 和98B 搞不到，我订了把KAR98AZ，旦泽1912年的。 不知道刺刀能否通用呢。
巧啊，下集的内容
@@zavod.fiftyseven 等你的视频等的好幸苦，不过看在你的视频如此精致的份上，这等待也值当了👍。兄弟加油，你是整个海外华人圈做老枪做的最细致最精确的了！一如既往的支持你👍💪
感谢您的厚爱哈哈
不错！
I would like to know why Chinese soldiers in WWII seemed to frequently run out of ammo. Was there not enough manufacturing facility to produce the ammo? Was there not enough logistics to transport the ammo from the rear to the front? Did Japanese have better mobility and were able to surround Chinese force and cut off the supply?
all these factors. Barbara Tuchman's Stilwell and the American Experience in China describes that period well.
这几个枪栓好新啊。这么多年过去了，还这么亮堂。
阿根廷毛瑟的栓锈的比较厉害
@@zavod.fiftyseven 那杆是他们镀过东西，一镀东西就不行了，就跟那个原电池的原理，会锈的很快。
@@clintlzhang4066 确实。。。
Up有没有Krag-Jorgensen，那种供弹方式挺有意思的，之前了解过1400左右价格把我劝退了
我也被劝退了。。。感情没那么深
@@zavod.fiftyseven 哈哈哈哈
This is understandable that only rifles that chamber 8mm Mauser ammo were the most acceptable rifles for China in that period of time. China had facility to produce 8mm ammo; obviously China needed to stick with rifles that use 8mm ammo. This leaves with Mauser 98 and Hanyang 88 rifles as the possible choice. The striper clips used in Mauser 98 rifles are obviously better than the enbloc clips used in Hanyang 88 rifles. If an enbloc clip was not manufactured up to the spec or was dented during handling (the enbloc clip was made from thin/soft metal), the soldier would have a hard time inserting the enblock into the rifle or chambering a round. Too much at stake to depend on that thin piece of soft metal. Therefore, I agree that Mauser 98 rifle was the logical choice. As for whether full length Mauser 98 rifle is better, or shorter length Mauser 98K rifle is better, I don't know. Seem like they both have pros and cons. I guess that depends on how much bayoneting that the soldiers were expected to engage in.
其实我也有类似的疑问：98k， 中正式其实可以用Seitengewehr 98类似的刺刀，就像大盖儿，”枪不够，刺刀凑“。当年我们本身的单兵技能素质就不如日军，为什么刺刀不加长来曾加一些白刃战胜算。
@@emj1123 我手上就有一把比利时出口到中国的98式长刺刀。那个时候中正式配的刺刀大多是长刺刀，很少用短刺刀。
@@petershen6924 Yes, you are likely to be correct. I have seen many pictures from that era. Seem like all are using extra long bayonets regardless if they use short rifle like 98K or long rifle like Hanyang 88. Having said this, I am not sure if Chinese soldiers at that time were fit for engaging in bayoneting. Most Chinese soldiers seemed like very thin and way-too-young -- like kids. The bayonet was most likely for psychological benefit just in case they ran out of ammo. Running out of ammo seemed like a frequently happened problem.
@@captainjayc9217 they were not even trained for bayonet combat. That is why Taiwan is so strict on bayonet drill in their military training to this day.
@@captainjayc9217 Army bayonet drill in Taiwan. ua-cam.com/video/Hzu3TIHf9JQ/v-deo.html
有没有拉栓的手枪
想不出来
油管上有人用摸心拿肝來改
试过中正式和98k大栓可以通用，不知道毛瑟98作为鼻祖是不是也是一个规格。
是的
我试过两者的大栓确实可以互换。不过出于质量控制的谨慎态度，从来不敢换大栓拿去打。
请教一个问题，是否早期的98k没有空仓挂机功能？
不是很确定，感觉是有
98K后座力实在太大，感觉这是不太适合抗战时期国情的唯一一个问题。南美常用的7mm口径毛瑟估计更适合我们军队在二战中使用
我觉得也是
从时间顺序下一期是Kar98az，还是中正式，或者是美30
还有Vz24
@@zavod.fiftyseven 我居然忘了马四环了。
@@zavod.fiftyseven 之前看您有
41厂（广东兵工厂）产的中正式步骑枪，据说41厂的头箍是铁皮搭焊的，后部还可以看见焊缝不知道是不是真的。
而且经常听到一种说法，因为蒋介石视察巩县兵工厂都二四式步枪提出改进意见，加长刺刀，缩短枪托，因此才改名中正式，不知道枪托相比与原版缩短多少？和98K差多少，之前看过98K和中正式图片对比发现差不多，和G98又差多少？
到时候我们比较一下
@@zavod.fiftyseven FN24 /MAUSER m24 Standard/VZ24,這三款一定要介紹一下Orz
全手動單發式步鎗落後，英國，日本，德國都在二戰後期放棄，而中國國軍只看美國提供的武器。
估计下一期就是98k活着三八式了😎
嘿嘿这些还要再等等
拉栓不应该是拐型的么？
卡宾枪是拐柄
作者可以搞到日本99式吗？
我在枪展见过有人卖。不过不想买，子弹问题。
可以
枪机亮闪闪，是镀铬的吗？
只是没有烤蓝
@@zavod.fiftyseven 如果不是镀铬，那么是做的什么表面处理呢？如何防锈？
我有一把原装98K也是没有烤蓝。
没有防锈处理。。。靠合金本身和涂油吧。。。
现在要卖5000 刀了吧
这个倒不至于
好活
三八大盖的栓在抄袭二代毛瑟时做到了极致，拆和装都只需要三秒钟。。
一看这用户名就知道是三八大盖爱好者
@@zavod.fiftyseven 我是挺喜欢日本友坂系列的，目前有三八长，卡宾，44骑兵和99。 日本枪没有很多国人传的那么垃圾。。。毛瑟和莫辛纳甘系列我也都很喜欢，玩老枪的都这样吧。
日系的收的比我齐全
@@zavod.fiftyseven 无奈我在土澳，看你那些SKS,AR,AK流口水，咱只能拉大栓，所以也就只能收藏一些一二战老家伙了。。
我的收藏主要也是拉大栓的
精彩！