Maintenance for this thing will probably look worse than the 12. That engine is gonna suck for any desalination or comp wash considering how you've got 40 or so aluminum screws required for access compared to the 8 hinges you can pull for ease of maintenance on the 12. The firewall separating that engine on their CAD files looks a little dubious for access to the FDU, Generators, and anything really on the AGB compared to the space given on the PC-12 NGX. That serviceable lav they have positioned definitely means the flight controls run to the left of the fuselage if they were smart but that also means that the lav will leak down onto any Avionics LRUs sitting at the bottom of the plane. I like how it's easy to tell that the plane was reverse engineered from a Legacy variant as well based on the Pre-SB winglet design of a PC-12. Wouldn't want this thing for an operator. Just get an NGX.
Thanks for a well done story. The performance stats are on par with the Pilatus PC-12. It will be interesting over time to see how the new GE engine compares to the Pratt PT-6. As a pilot, for an owner/pilot upgrading, think the Garmin G3000 avionics package is an easier transition than the Honeywell used on the Pilatus.
Since the Denali(what is the meaning of the name btw?)is made as a competitor for the PC-12,is Pilatus considering an improved version to compete with the"D" in the future?
Yeah, it's been out. It's the NGX and it boasts largely the same features with way friendlier maintenance than the mess of a front end that the Denali has.
Maintenance for this thing will probably look worse than the 12. That engine is gonna suck for any desalination or comp wash considering how you've got 40 or so aluminum screws required for access compared to the 8 hinges you can pull for ease of maintenance on the 12. The firewall separating that engine on their CAD files looks a little dubious for access to the FDU, Generators, and anything really on the AGB compared to the space given on the PC-12 NGX. That serviceable lav they have positioned definitely means the flight controls run to the left of the fuselage if they were smart but that also means that the lav will leak down onto any Avionics LRUs sitting at the bottom of the plane. I like how it's easy to tell that the plane was reverse engineered from a Legacy variant as well based on the Pre-SB winglet design of a PC-12. Wouldn't want this thing for an operator. Just get an NGX.
I'm Shocked at single engine turbo plane prices. That's life I guess🤑🤑
Its almost as expensive as the twin engine KA 350!
Maximize the bottom line, screw the customer.
Thanks for a well done story.
The performance stats are on par with the Pilatus PC-12.
It will be interesting over time to see how the new GE engine compares to the Pratt PT-6.
As a pilot, for an owner/pilot upgrading,
think the Garmin G3000 avionics package is an easier transition than the Honeywell used on the Pilatus.
For that price get a King air 200/350 or Pc-12 or possibly Phenom used.
Beautiful
Wow it does have a Walters/I would want the PC with the Pratt & Whitney
Does it need prist ?
Is it a Cessna or a Beechcraft? According to the clip, it is both!
I think that Beechcraft is a branch or trademark of Cessna. Both are part of Textron.
Never noticed this before on others but do the passenger seats not have belts? Perhaps they are hidden and I'm just not seeing them.
Must have them, are you kidding, in this day and age !
Since the Denali(what is the meaning of the name btw?)is made as a competitor for the PC-12,is Pilatus considering an improved version to compete with the"D" in the future?
Highest mountain in north America
@@fishfoolishness4222 with mt. McKinley, right?
Yeah, it's been out. It's the NGX and it boasts largely the same features with way friendlier maintenance than the mess of a front end that the Denali has.
@@EuReKaPresents thank you!
Way to expensive...7 million spread it out guys.
It would get more interest/ competition if it was priced below $5 million.
@@slploudmouth you can buy a lot of nice jets for way under 5m