I own both: My HD28 has an overshadowing bass, some think the bass drowns out the mid and upper register. Great for Bluegrass. My D28 is very well balanced. Mid, low, and high are almost the same with the bass being the brightest. I think that that if you primarily play Bluegrass instrumentals the HD28 is the guitar for you; if you play instrumentals from several genres or sing, the D28, I think, is best.
I just bought an HD28 over a D28. Tend to prefer the HD to a standard D. Played both and think the HD is a more nuanced guitar, especially on lead playing, and I'm not a bluegrass player. The bass does stand out, but in a good way. Can't go wrong with either one. Both are just great guitars.
The HD-28 actually originates from the early D-28 pattern which Martin first produced back in 1931, complete with herringbone inlay and scalloped bracing. A very popular guitar in its day due to good projection and volume. It is therefore the original D-28, and fair to say the HD-28 reproduces the much desired tone from the 1930's, with the exception of using Brazilian rosewood. Martin discontinued scalloping the braces post WW2 because of possible structural issues arising from players using increasingly heavy strings, thereby lifting the spruce tops. As far as I know, Martin still discourage the use of extra heavy gauge strings unless tuned down. The herringbone was also withdrawn post WW2 because of shortages of inlay from Germany. As well as this there were economy reasons, but players kept buying the revamped D-28's during the 50's, the guitar becoming one of Martin's best sellers. This guitar continued to be called the D-28 despite these changes. Then in the 1970's, the HD-28 was produced in response to players seeking the early "Golden Era" sound of the original 1930's D-28's. To great success. For me the HD-28 has better projection, bass, and a more"open" sound, but others still go for the D-28. Great to have the choice.
@@707king Yes, Martin used Adirondack spruce (also known as red srpuce) for tops and bracing. Not sure when they stopped. WW2, or in the 50's? Most guitars I've played with Adirondack spruce are a fair bit louder than the same, or similar guitars with Sitka spruce tops. So with Adirondack spruce and Brazilian rosewood, those guitars have a lot of projection (red spruce) and perhaps more clarity, or a glassier tone due to the Brazilian RW
The Martin Standard series does not have GE style bracing pattern. The closest you can get to a pre-war Martin that is in production are the Authentic series. Forward Shifted/Scalloped bracing doesn't equate to Golden Era bracing. It's different construction using shorter bracing and the scallop is more of an even taper up to the center of the X - not a C shape chunk missing from the brace like on HD28s. Along with pre-war Martins having a T-bar truss rod - not an adjustable truss rod. They also have fatter V necks that could be inconsistent even at that time. The bridges and bridge plates are smaller as well on 30s D28s. HD28s have always been the modern scalloped (now forward scalloped braced) guitar. It's not comparable to a prewar in any way really.
Thanks to everyone for all the history. Appreciated. Personally, I prefer the HD-28, but I am biased. As that is the version of the 28 that I went with.
I was really expecting to like the HD28 at least 5x more, but the D28 just seems like THE acoustic guitar. It sounds so classic. Plus because of the non scalloped bracing, the top won’t bell-curve as much at the bridge. Fantastic instruments and a fantastic video. Keep it up!
I would disagree. I hVe both and the HD28 is a better guitar. Not that the D28 isn’t super awesome but the power of the HD 28 is amazing. And the harder you strum it just gets louder while still producing clear and precise sound. Truly amazing guitar. Jmo
@@R.L.Humpert I would need to be hearing the two of them in that room, if not playing them myself to decide. From my laptop speaker, I don't hear much difference (Am I hearing as hair more bass on the HD...or is that a pre-programmed bias?) I own a 2001 HD and just love it. I've never played a newer D to compare it. I did have the chance to play a mid-70s D-35 about 30 years ago, which sounded utterly fantastic and that was when I first got bitten by the 'Martin bug'.
@@franciskhoury4288 yes you got a very good point. I had my Bose headphones on and they are close in sound. I got the Martin bug too and just love them.
Agree. HD is too muddy for me, too much going on. It's like having chocolate sprinkles on a chocolate cupcake. I'm not a huge rosewood fan to begin with so it makes sense that the guitar (of the two) that downplays those rosewood tendencies is the one I prefer. I generally lean towards the D-18 but thinking about picking up a D-28.
I was never a Martin guy. I was more of a Guild guy and was looking to pickup a Guild D-55 based on the sound tests on youtube. I pulled in a HD-28 off the wall and a Gibson Songwriter just for comparison expecting to leave with the Guild D-55. Was really disappointed with the Guild and hated the Songwriter as it sounded very dead. The moment I played the HD-28 I was hooked. It rang like crazy and sounded great. It has more low end and high end than the D-28 to my ears. I'm converted! Love my HD-28!
If you guys do D-18 vs. D-28, you really ought to do D-18 vs HD-28, because the D-18 and HD-28 are both forward-shifted and scalloped, while the D-28 is not scalloped. Sorry for all the comments but hopefully it will attract attention to this video so you guys list it!
Wow, I just know learned the D-18 was scalloped! All this time (a really long time) I assumed it was standard bracing, especially because I discovered there was also an HD-18.
A few years ago, I played my d18 alongside a great hd28. It was pretty fun. Even though my d18 is getting a more bass sound, I could really hear that extra bass when I was playing the hd28. I don't use picks when I play, usually my thumb and index finger for my rhythm playing. If my thumb nail grows a bit, it really does sound pretty close to a pick. I have to get used to a softer sound when I have to cut my nails. Having any martin of any kind is truly a joy. Hopefully, someday I'll be able to get a martin hd28 to go along with my d18.
Pretty close, but to my ears, the D-28 sounded more 'solid' but the HD-28 sounded more open, if that makes sense. The beauty of both of these are they do not have neck binding, (as on the HD-35) which to me is a good thing,
I felt like the HD-28 was fuller and louder. The D-28 was nice and balanced but when you changed to the HD-28, it was like the volume was turned up. I would also be interested in a D-18/HD-28 comparison.
I also feel like the HD-28 sounds fuller...but also breaks al little bit or distorts with a slightly heavier hand. The D-28 holds a bit more with a stronger hand. If you're good you can control that. My D-28 is 18 years old (2002) and has aged nicely...holds it's own with a newer HD.
There's more bass in the HD-28, but it sounds kind of thumpy and detached from the rest of the sound to me, like someone's hitting a cajon offscreen in time with the low notes...the D-28 has a more coherent sound up and down the spectrum, and a sweeter, richer midrange.
Thanks for always doing excellent comparison videos. To my ears, more balance with the D-28 across the six strings with the difference of the HD-28 having a more pronounced low E & D string punctuation. My. 1st Martin was a 1998 HD-28 which I still have and still have fun playing even in the presence of my D-28 37 Authentic, D-28 CWB or D-18 GE.
I love a loud throaty acoustic guitar! Hard to beat HD28 for that. If your patient you can find a HD28 that is boomy AND balanced well. You gotta play a bunch of them to find one. Maybe 1 in 20 has the perfect bassy boomey sound while also being articulate with loud clear highs
I had a Taylor 714ce and just traded it for an HD-28. I think it truly is the best guitar on the market, I was so against non electronics, dreadnought bodies and I needed electronics, the sound of the HD-28 on the first strum was enough to make me disregard all 3 of those things and just pull the trigger. I am now a full believer in tone over playability and cosmetics; because techniques can be learned and accessories can always be added, but good raw tone is something that's hard to modify. Just my opinion. Great video also
Both sound great!! Went with the HD28. I wanted more low end. Really wanted D41/42/45, but wallet said no way. It's a perfect match with my 814ce v class which is a mid/high projection monster, but lacks low end. Love having the choice of two totally different sound signatures depending on my mood. HD35 was also an option. All sound great and once home without comparing back to back anyone would be happy with any Martin D model.
I agree with you. I'll never forget the first time I played an E chord on my d18. I played that first chord, and I had to have it. I didn't know about the hd28 guitars, or I might have gotten an hd28. Its a pain being blind as I can't drive up to the music store in my area, and play the one hd28 they currently have in stock.
Listening on flat headphones the D28 sounds more balanced which I think would be more suited for recording. The HD28 has more bottom and top end, kind of boomy and would need to cut out a lot of those lows in a mix, probably great live though.
Im like a kid in a candy shop with my (Reimagined) 2019 HD-28, even now after a year of having it, Ive had the d-28,$1700, the D-Special Ovangkol $1300, and I took both of those back, and just bit the bullet on the $3100 on the HD-28, and Im much happier. (At least for my and my style of playing) The D-28, has more mids, and is clear sounding The HD-28 (to me) is much more fuller sounding, without the over reaching mids like the D-28.
I’ve played both, both are great. I own the D28. It’s has more clarity and mid, but still a good amount of bass and volume. The HD-28 has more bass, boom, and responsiveness, but can lose some clarity when strumming. To each his own!
I always enjoy these kinds of videos. I personally like the HD28. At least to my ears, the d28 is just a little to bright for me. I like the extra bass. I own a d18 and I'd absolutely love to have an hd28 to go along with it.
Wow, so close. I'd pick the D28 because as it was more balanced. I could hear the mids clearly. The H definitely had more base to my ear and was slightly louder if that is more important to you.
How come this video is "unlisted"? Deserves some views! This is about as good a comparison as can be desired. I was wondering why it didn't pop up on my feed. I just found it by accident.
Put lighter stings on HD28 and control how you hit the low E and you can get a D28 sound out of it . Then you have the versatility of hitting the E harder when you want a bigger low end sound.
The HD28 is just a beast. What a guitar. Sounds like a power engine. I got one myself now a custom one with the Adirondack top. Pretty amazing how awesome Martin is.
I bought a D-28 earlier this year and didn’t realize there was an HD-28. Now I want the HD but not sure if it’s worth selling my D-28 and purchasing an HD and losing the money.
The HD seems to have more overtone so I’d think it would be a great choice for a soloist accompanying themself singing. The D-28 has clearer and more precise articulation which would really shine in an ensemble.
Hey, Quinton even answered my Herco Thumbpick question, thanks! Gotta get one of those. I feel like the Clapton vs 000-28 video was for me, too. :D Fan service!
In this video, I like the D28 better. That said when I've played a dozen or so Martins in a store, I've always liked the HD-28V sound the best. The HD-28 has more bass and also has a fuller sound and richer highs (and the vintage neck is ever so much better). Now I don't play all that hard most of the time, so the lows in the D28 seem overpowering but I would definitely tell heavy players to look at a D28 or D35 if they can afford it.
I own an HD28 but in this vid with these guitars, the D28 sounded louder and more defined. The high strings were much punchier. The D28 killed the HD28
I had the total opposite experience ha. The HD28 was the clear winner to my ears. But that's what makes this stuff great. 2 people can hear the same thing and disagree.
Roget that,@@RogerThat902!!! I own the HD28 and love it; no need for a video comparison. But given this well-made video, I have to agree that I liked the sound of the HD28 better. I also agree with the "open" impression of the HD28 tone vs the D28 being bright and chimey.
It’s hard to talk down about either guitar, BUT😊 The HD just sounds like a flawless strum as to where the D has an imperfect sound. VERY close to perfect but barely lagging behind the HD. I’d give you a $100 for either one right now though. 😀
The D-28 sounded like an old friend I knew well. I'm certain I've heard that sound on countless songs. The HD-28 was surprisingly more gutsy or robust a sound over the D-28.
Him and Sturgill are the reasons I’m saving up for one over the next year. Both master acoustic pickers and if it’s good enough for those guys then it’s good enough for anybody
There's no wrong answer here. One of these two guitar's will inspire you assuming you have your heart set on a Martin dreadnought. My advice would be before you make a final decision is to add the Modern Deluxe into the equation.
The HD has more bottom due to the mids being scooped because of the scalloped braces. As a kid I played my friends 1941 D-28 and am real familiar with the sound.
I think the mids are scooped due to the Rosewood. I have a D18GE and an HD28.. the GE has scalloped braces and much more mid range I’m guessing because of the Mahogany.
6:55 The HD-28 has three dimensions, the D-28 has a flat impression I hear a vast 3D space from mine all the time just hanging my head down and listening to a real depth: nearer, farther, left and right, like a good turntable's sytlus on a stereo LP
I have a Hd-28vr and it is loud as this HD-28. Not to say the D-28 does not sound good, it sounds absolutely great, it just doesn't have the Projection as the HD. I love 'em both. Great guitars. Just depends on the individual. Great Video Fellas, good work.
If you guys are buying between 1 of these.. play it in a shop.. i played both side by side and my ear just love the d28 over the hd.. not because one is more expensive doesnt always mean its better..
Just listening to the video, the HD wins on tone, which is consistent with other video comparisons I've listened to. But the heavy bass would be my reason for buying a 28, so that's a for what it's worth comment. It'd also be for more bluegrass, old timey playing for me. I tend to think the D is probably more durable. I've played both, but don't own one. I can't remember which one I liked better. I do own a Martin OM, which is my all-time favorite guitar. The brand is solid in quality and warranty-related stuff. It's the only factory-made brand I'd consider for a dreadnought.
I have been using a thumb pick like that for a while . Really like the way they work. My only problem is for some reason my fingerpicking does not sound as good as Quinton's??? Thanks guys,love all your videos !
It seems the opinions split 50/50 for the HD-28 and D-28. Wish this youtube video has polls for HD-28 and D-28 so that people can just vote for the guitar they like.
Purchased my D28 new year's ago 2005 ish and it certainly doesn't need anymore bottom end. Both these guitars are killer but the proper set-up is the true secret. I owned my Grandfather's D35 he purchased new in 76 and I'll easily say my 28 is a way more musical instrument and everyone tries to buy it. D28 earned it's reputation
Straight braced d28 for me. I love both depending what mood I'm in. However I've tried to live with the new neck and feel it's just not fitting me. Need just a little chunk on the profile. I'll have to go custom shop unless namm 2020 hold a nice surprise.
Information on these are all over the internet and its easy to find - example: martin guitar.com. I use the scroll button to get to where I want to hear the comparisons, instead of bitching about it in the comment section.
D18😊 I got Guilds( martins including koa ukulele backpacker GPC y some cheapo dread…I sing a lot so I treated them differently as to my keyboards y harmonicas)😅
You guys really gotta learn to stop talking. And I'm not trying to be rude. It happens everytime. Set a moment when you're gonna compare and stick to it.
The HD can get a bit "Boomy" at times.... I have had two and its seems less noticeable when your playing it but out front its there. It really sucks you in because of all the vibration you feel but out front I think the D28 is better.
The videos are always so short with only 1 minutes total of playing the guitars. Could you play for a minute longer and subtract a minute of talking if you're set on this short videos?
Here's one for you......two bowls of really good cereal. One you put fresh milk in and you let set for a minute before eating. Still taste great and has that crunch (D 28). Now you have bowl number 2 same cereal ....same milk but as soon as you pour the milk you dig in (HD 28). .....now I want a bowl of cereal mmmmmmm HD 28 style.
Up to the fifth Minute: well made to hear the différences between both, thanks!. But like you said, the mix/headphone.. will interfer and sometimes, in favor of one of the two. Here the HD28 sounds really more smoothy than the one i have since 30years .In an other video HD28 vs D35, the HD28 sounds really better and realistic than this one for exmple.
The D-28 for me doesnt do it. It really needs the scallopped braces. The top really doesnt vibrate and it just makes for a disappointing experience when it comes to projection and base response. HD-28 folks.
Just bought an HD-28 today. Traded my D10E for a real American Martin. Very excited
YES I HAVE A D11E. HOW DO YOU LIKE IT NOW? W/D28.
I own both: My HD28 has an overshadowing bass, some think the bass drowns out the mid and upper register. Great for Bluegrass. My D28 is very well balanced. Mid, low, and high are almost the same with the bass being the brightest. I think that that if you primarily play Bluegrass instrumentals the HD28 is the guitar for you; if you play instrumentals from several genres or sing, the D28, I think, is best.
Thank you for sharing that perspective!
With that big thick stiff pick its hard to pick up the sweet sound of the instrument they are just loud and sound almost alike .....
Picking distance between the bridge and sound hole' one will sound like the other.
I just bought an HD28 over a D28. Tend to prefer the HD to a standard D. Played both and think the HD is a more nuanced guitar, especially on lead playing, and I'm not a bluegrass player. The bass does stand out, but in a good way. Can't go wrong with either one. Both are just great guitars.
That's some good editing switching back and forth between guitars. Well done. Thanks
The HD-28 actually originates from the early D-28 pattern which Martin first produced back in 1931, complete with herringbone inlay and scalloped bracing. A very popular guitar in its day due to good projection and volume. It is therefore the original D-28, and fair to say the HD-28 reproduces the much desired tone from the 1930's, with the exception of using Brazilian rosewood.
Martin discontinued scalloping the braces post WW2 because of possible structural issues arising from players using increasingly heavy strings, thereby lifting the spruce tops. As far as I know, Martin still discourage the use of extra heavy gauge strings unless tuned down. The herringbone was also withdrawn post WW2 because of shortages of inlay from Germany. As well as this there were economy reasons, but players kept buying the revamped D-28's during the 50's, the guitar becoming one of Martin's best sellers.
This guitar continued to be called the D-28 despite these changes. Then in the 1970's, the HD-28 was produced in response to players seeking the early "Golden Era" sound of the original 1930's D-28's. To great success.
For me the HD-28 has better projection, bass, and a more"open" sound, but others still go for the D-28. Great to have the choice.
I think the original D28’s from the 30’s has Adirondack spruce tops and braces as well, no? Great comment and great info btw.
@@707king Yes, Martin used Adirondack spruce (also known as red srpuce) for tops and bracing. Not sure when they stopped. WW2, or in the 50's? Most guitars I've played with Adirondack spruce are a fair bit louder than the same, or similar guitars with Sitka spruce tops. So with Adirondack spruce and Brazilian rosewood, those guitars have a lot of projection (red spruce) and perhaps more clarity, or a glassier tone due to the Brazilian RW
The Martin Standard series does not have GE style bracing pattern. The closest you can get to a pre-war Martin that is in production are the Authentic series. Forward Shifted/Scalloped bracing doesn't equate to Golden Era bracing. It's different construction using shorter bracing and the scallop is more of an even taper up to the center of the X - not a C shape chunk missing from the brace like on HD28s. Along with pre-war Martins having a T-bar truss rod - not an adjustable truss rod. They also have fatter V necks that could be inconsistent even at that time. The bridges and bridge plates are smaller as well on 30s D28s.
HD28s have always been the modern scalloped (now forward scalloped braced) guitar. It's not comparable to a prewar in any way really.
@@BeeDee108 They actually used sitka for bracing back in the day. This is one of those details people gripe a bit over w/ the authentic series.
Thanks to everyone for all the history. Appreciated.
Personally, I prefer the HD-28, but I am biased. As that is the version of the 28 that I went with.
I was really expecting to like the HD28 at least 5x more, but the D28 just seems like THE acoustic guitar. It sounds so classic. Plus because of the non scalloped bracing, the top won’t bell-curve as much at the bridge. Fantastic instruments and a fantastic video. Keep it up!
I would disagree. I hVe both and the HD28 is a better guitar. Not that the D28 isn’t super awesome but the power of the HD 28 is amazing. And the harder you strum it just gets louder while still producing clear and precise sound. Truly amazing guitar. Jmo
@@R.L.Humpert I would need to be hearing the two of them in that room, if not playing them myself to decide. From my laptop speaker, I don't hear much difference (Am I hearing as hair more bass on the HD...or is that a pre-programmed bias?) I own a 2001 HD and just love it. I've never played a newer D to compare it. I did have the chance to play a mid-70s D-35 about 30 years ago, which sounded utterly fantastic and that was when I first got bitten by the 'Martin bug'.
@@franciskhoury4288 yes you got a very good point. I had my Bose headphones on and they are close in sound. I got the Martin bug too and just love them.
@@R.L.Humpert Yes, we know the feeling! They are an absolute pleasure!
Agree. HD is too muddy for me, too much going on. It's like having chocolate sprinkles on a chocolate cupcake. I'm not a huge rosewood fan to begin with so it makes sense that the guitar (of the two) that downplays those rosewood tendencies is the one I prefer. I generally lean towards the D-18 but thinking about picking up a D-28.
I was never a Martin guy. I was more of a Guild guy and was looking to pickup a Guild D-55 based on the sound tests on youtube. I pulled in a HD-28 off the wall and a Gibson Songwriter just for comparison expecting to leave with the Guild D-55. Was really disappointed with the Guild and hated the Songwriter as it sounded very dead. The moment I played the HD-28 I was hooked. It rang like crazy and sounded great. It has more low end and high end than the D-28 to my ears. I'm converted! Love my HD-28!
HD slightly more robust but D more clarity. Subtle but real difference
"Universally Endearing Traits": Always appreciate somebody who can use language that well. Thank you.
If your ears are tuned for harmonics, Standard D-28 with a heavy right hand is where the musicality breathes. Bass can’t compensate for that.
I found that also buying mine 🙂
If you guys do D-18 vs. D-28, you really ought to do D-18 vs HD-28, because the D-18 and HD-28 are both forward-shifted and scalloped, while the D-28 is not scalloped. Sorry for all the comments but hopefully it will attract attention to this video so you guys list it!
Wow, I just know learned the D-18 was scalloped! All this time (a really long time) I assumed it was standard bracing, especially because I discovered there was also an HD-18.
A few years ago, I played my d18 alongside a great hd28. It was pretty fun. Even though my d18 is getting a more bass sound, I could really hear that extra bass when I was playing the hd28. I don't use picks when I play, usually my thumb and index finger for my rhythm playing. If my thumb nail grows a bit, it really does sound pretty close to a pick. I have to get used to a softer sound when I have to cut my nails. Having any martin of any kind is truly a joy. Hopefully, someday I'll be able to get a martin hd28 to go along with my d18.
The HD sounds as if the same guitar went into a Pultec eq that got switched on. I think that slightly better bass response makes it the winner.
Pretty close, but to my ears, the D-28 sounded more 'solid' but the HD-28 sounded more open, if that makes sense.
The beauty of both of these are they do not have neck binding, (as on the HD-35) which to me is a good thing,
I also hate white binding on the neck for some reason.
I felt like the HD-28 was fuller and louder.
The D-28 was nice and balanced but when you changed to the HD-28, it was like the volume was turned up.
I would also be interested in a D-18/HD-28 comparison.
Beautiful guitars and playing. To my ear, the HD-28 just has that rich bottom end the D just can't find. Enjoyed the video guys keep on playing!
Yup HD more full
I also feel like the HD-28 sounds fuller...but also breaks al little bit or distorts with a slightly heavier hand. The D-28 holds a bit more with a stronger hand. If you're good you can control that. My D-28 is 18 years old (2002) and has aged nicely...holds it's own with a newer HD.
The D 28 might be slightly more versatile
The D28 seems a bit punchier and more sparkly to me. Probably better to sit in a band mix.
There's more bass in the HD-28, but it sounds kind of thumpy and detached from the rest of the sound to me, like someone's hitting a cajon offscreen in time with the low notes...the D-28 has a more coherent sound up and down the spectrum, and a sweeter, richer midrange.
That’s why the D18 is the one.
HD 28 seems to cover full tonal spectrum more clearly, better top end response plus more true to golden era specs.
Thanks for always doing excellent comparison videos. To my ears, more balance with the D-28 across the six strings with the difference of the HD-28 having a more pronounced low E & D string punctuation. My. 1st Martin was a 1998 HD-28 which I still have and still have fun playing even in the presence of my D-28 37 Authentic, D-28 CWB or D-18 GE.
I love a loud throaty acoustic guitar! Hard to beat HD28 for that. If your patient you can find a HD28 that is boomy AND balanced well. You gotta play a bunch of them to find one. Maybe 1 in 20 has the perfect bassy boomey sound while also being articulate with loud clear highs
For me, the HD-28 was the clear winner
I had a Taylor 714ce and just traded it for an HD-28. I think it truly is the best guitar on the market, I was so against non electronics, dreadnought bodies and I needed electronics, the sound of the HD-28 on the first strum was enough to make me disregard all 3 of those things and just pull the trigger. I am now a full believer in tone over playability and cosmetics; because techniques can be learned and accessories can always be added, but good raw tone is something that's hard to modify. Just my opinion. Great video also
At least for these particular guitars, the D28 is the clear winner. IMHO, of course.
Both sound great!! Went with the HD28. I wanted more low end. Really wanted D41/42/45, but wallet said no way. It's a perfect match with my 814ce v class which is a mid/high projection monster, but lacks low end. Love having the choice of two totally different sound signatures depending on my mood. HD35 was also an option. All sound great and once home without comparing back to back anyone would be happy with any Martin D model.
I agree with you. I'll never forget the first time I played an E chord on my d18. I played that first chord, and I had to have it. I didn't know about the hd28 guitars, or I might have gotten an hd28. Its a pain being blind as I can't drive up to the music store in my area, and play the one hd28 they currently have in stock.
Listening on flat headphones the D28 sounds more balanced which I think would be more suited for recording. The HD28 has more bottom and top end, kind of boomy and would need to cut out a lot of those lows in a mix, probably great live though.
Im like a kid in a candy shop with my (Reimagined) 2019 HD-28, even now after a year of having it, Ive had the d-28,$1700, the D-Special Ovangkol $1300, and I took both of those back, and just bit the bullet on the $3100 on the HD-28, and Im much happier. (At least for my and my style of playing)
The D-28, has more mids, and is clear sounding
The HD-28 (to me) is much more fuller sounding, without the over reaching mids like the D-28.
The most notable difference I hear is that the HD-28 has more attack than the D-28.
I think the same, the HD-28 is a bit more lively with better definition.
I’ve played both, both are great. I own the D28. It’s has more clarity and mid, but still a good amount of bass and volume. The HD-28 has more bass, boom, and responsiveness, but can lose some clarity when strumming. To each his own!
I always enjoy these kinds of videos. I personally like the HD28. At least to my ears, the d28 is just a little to bright for me. I like the extra bass. I own a d18 and I'd absolutely love to have an hd28 to go along with it.
Do you like your d18 more than the hd28
I’m in the same boat. I have a D18 but I’d also love the HD28
Wow, so close. I'd pick the D28 because as it was more balanced. I could hear the mids clearly. The H definitely had more base to my ear and was slightly louder if that is more important to you.
It’s not just louder but the louder you go doesn’t matter it still sound clean and crispy so for me the HD28 is better handily.
How come this video is "unlisted"? Deserves some views! This is about as good a comparison as can be desired. I was wondering why it didn't pop up on my feed. I just found it by accident.
It would have been good to hear some single note lead lines and some arpeggiating rather than purely strumming.
Put lighter stings on HD28 and control how you hit the low E and you can get a D28 sound out of it . Then you have the versatility of hitting the E harder when you want a bigger low end sound.
The HD28 is just a beast. What a guitar. Sounds like a power engine. I got one myself now a custom one with the Adirondack top. Pretty amazing how awesome Martin is.
I bought a D-28 earlier this year and didn’t realize there was an HD-28. Now I want the HD but not sure if it’s worth selling my D-28 and purchasing an HD and losing the money.
Or you can play the guitar and let us hear instead of talking so much lol
Or you can scrub through the video to find the part where the guitars are being A/B'd and quit yer bellyaching. Some people actually like the talking.
@@reverb508 lol yeah right keep telling yourself that superstar
Really stfu so we can hear!
Why are you so rude?
Jesus Christ...for real!!!
The HD seems to have more overtone so I’d think it would be a great choice for a soloist accompanying themself singing. The D-28 has clearer and more precise articulation which would really shine in an ensemble.
Hey, Quinton even answered my Herco Thumbpick question, thanks! Gotta get one of those. I feel like the Clapton vs 000-28 video was for me, too. :D Fan service!
In this video, I like the D28 better. That said when I've played a dozen or so Martins in a store, I've always liked the HD-28V sound the best. The HD-28 has more bass and also has a fuller sound and richer highs (and the vintage neck is ever so much better).
Now I don't play all that hard most of the time, so the lows in the D28 seem overpowering but I would definitely tell heavy players to look at a D28 or D35 if they can afford it.
HD 28 a little more open, airy and crisp.
Yep. Projects a bit more
I own an HD28 but in this vid with these guitars, the D28 sounded louder and more defined. The high strings were much punchier. The D28 killed the HD28
I had the total opposite experience ha. The HD28 was the clear winner to my ears. But that's what makes this stuff great. 2 people can hear the same thing and disagree.
Roget that,@@RogerThat902!!! I own the HD28 and love it; no need for a video comparison. But given this well-made video, I have to agree that I liked the sound of the HD28 better. I also agree with the "open" impression of the HD28 tone vs the D28 being bright and chimey.
@sean fried I agree with you, to me the d28 was louder and more defined.
I've played both of these at least a few times, and I know that neither their recording nor my speakers do this any justice, haha.
I wonder what the difference in longevity will be between the un-scalloped and scalloped bracing... how long before the tops start to lift ?!!
The HD clearly had much fuller bass.
It’s hard to talk down about either guitar, BUT😊
The HD just sounds like a flawless strum as to where the D has an imperfect sound. VERY close to perfect but barely lagging behind the HD.
I’d give you a $100 for either one right now though. 😀
The D-28 sounded like an old friend I knew well. I'm certain I've heard that sound on countless songs.
The HD-28 was surprisingly more gutsy or robust a sound over the D-28.
Look up Tyler Childers Live on Red Barn for a HD-28 done right.
Him and Sturgill are the reasons I’m saving up for one over the next year. Both master acoustic pickers and if it’s good enough for those guys then it’s good enough for anybody
There's no wrong answer here. One of these two guitar's will inspire you assuming you have your heart set on a Martin dreadnought. My advice would be before you make a final decision is to add the Modern Deluxe into the equation.
And as always Thanks for the video guy's 👍
The HD has more bottom due to the mids being scooped because of the scalloped braces. As a kid I played my friends 1941 D-28 and am real familiar with the sound.
I think the mids are scooped due to the Rosewood. I have a D18GE and an HD28.. the GE has scalloped braces and much more mid range I’m guessing because of the Mahogany.
707king I agree. Mahogany punched more mids. Doc Watson chose mahogany for the back and sides of his signature Gallagher dreadnaught for that reason.
@@707king which do you prefer, d18 or hd28, deciding right now.
!? What’re you gonna use it for
I was surprised, the HD28 almost sounded muddy in comparison to the D28, almost like the strings were being dampened.
6:55 The HD-28 has three dimensions, the D-28 has a flat impression I hear a vast 3D space from mine all the time just hanging my head down and listening to a real depth: nearer, farther, left and right, like a good turntable's sytlus on a stereo LP
I have a Hd-28vr and it is loud as this HD-28. Not to say the D-28 does not sound good, it sounds absolutely great, it just doesn't have the Projection as the HD. I love 'em both. Great guitars. Just depends on the individual. Great Video Fellas, good work.
Thanks buying D28 👍🏾
If you guys are buying between 1 of these.. play it in a shop.. i played both side by side and my ear just love the d28 over the hd.. not because one is more expensive doesnt always mean its better..
I like my D28 because it’s brighter and better balanced. But I’d take either really.
D28 , sound is more balancing over HD28
As an 000 player, I definitely agree! I'd argue even the D28 is too boomy - and the HD28 cranks the bass up to 11
I agree!!! Prefer the D28 sound.
@@CaptTerrific That's why you go mahogany with something like golden Era scalloped bracing.
Just listening to the video, the HD wins on tone, which is consistent with other video comparisons I've listened to. But the heavy bass would be my reason for buying a 28, so that's a for what it's worth comment. It'd also be for more bluegrass, old timey playing for me. I tend to think the D is probably more durable. I've played both, but don't own one. I can't remember which one I liked better. I do own a Martin OM, which is my all-time favorite guitar. The brand is solid in quality and warranty-related stuff. It's the only factory-made brand I'd consider for a dreadnought.
Glad the HD28 choose me :)
HD28. Can back off hard low E and A strings if you want to get more high/mid sound. Or hammer them E and A to get big bass.
The essential is behind the guitar !
Does it live with you or not.
They are both very nice but I still prefer the tone of my D-35 and D-41.
Great comparison. Thanks guys.
Dreads are beasts, OM's are perfect.............
I have been using a thumb pick like that for a while . Really like the way they work. My only problem is for some reason my fingerpicking does not sound as good as Quinton's??? Thanks guys,love all your videos !
At least they did get the HD-28 tuned up before the final couple of minutes of demo !
I like Martins but aren’t you in Gibson country?
sssshhhhhhh
scalloped braces gets my vote every time but that's not to say non-scalloped braces has their place too.
I have my eye on an HD-28. However in this video the D-28 had the more balanced tone and was brighter. Damn.
Each guitar is going to be a bit different, so you really should go play each possible one you could buy before you spend the money.
Some people.... like to hear themselves talk
these guys love the sound of their voices
It seems the opinions split 50/50 for the HD-28 and D-28. Wish this youtube video has polls for HD-28 and D-28 so that people can just vote for the guitar they like.
He changed his shirt and even his guitar at 05:18. LOL.
Purchased my D28 new year's ago 2005 ish and it certainly doesn't need anymore bottom end. Both these guitars are killer but the proper set-up is the true secret. I owned my Grandfather's D35 he purchased new in 76 and I'll easily say my 28 is a way more musical instrument and everyone tries to buy it. D28 earned it's reputation
Straight braced d28 for me. I love both depending what mood I'm in. However I've tried to live with the new neck and feel it's just not fitting me. Need just a little chunk on the profile.
I'll have to go custom shop unless namm 2020 hold a nice surprise.
Please do a comparison video including Recording King RD 328 also like Eastman E20D etc
Almost 6 minutes in and there's been no information or testing.
Information on these are all over the internet and its easy to find - example: martin guitar.com. I use the scroll button to get to where I want to hear the comparisons, instead of bitching about it in the comment section.
these guys love to bullshit very little actual demoing or playing
I couldn't take it , went to last 2 min.......dude with the hat would not shut up and play
The bass is clearly louder on the HD28 if you ask me....
What is the herringbone relevance?
The original D-28’s had herringbone.
D18😊 I got Guilds( martins including koa ukulele backpacker GPC y some cheapo dread…I sing a lot so I treated them differently as to my keyboards y harmonicas)😅
The HD28 kind of booms, while the D28 sounds more normal.
Man, I really liked the one with the round sound hole the best! Such booming bass and articulated highs and lows. Beautiful sound! :)
Listen to it with your eyes shut, no cheating. Very very hard to distinguish….
In my opinion - D 28.
The HD sounds a bit bigger, fuller, it has a bit more base and "WAMP" like in the older D 28's and other Martin's...
If I'm sitting around a camp fire I'm taking the D-28.. that HD is a drum of nitro waiting for a spark.
Comparisons begin 7 mins in. I bought the D28
Once Quinton gets talkin' takes awhile before it unwinds...
02:50 They are the Fender Precision Basses of the acoustic guitar world.
too much conversation about his choice of picks and irrelevant B.S. thank you ! Jc
Thank you so much
You guys really gotta learn to stop talking. And I'm not trying to be rude. It happens everytime. Set a moment when you're gonna compare and stick to it.
@@rroman3891 i think hes the owner
@@rroman3891 hahahaa funny!! but thats what they always do I been watching them for years:)
No belly bridge on the d28 hd28?
D28 ! The HD is very good too, but there is too much bass
The HD can get a bit "Boomy" at times.... I have had two and its seems less noticeable when your playing it but out front its there. It really sucks you in because of all the vibration you feel but out front I think the D28 is better.
What mic are you playing into?
We use a Neumann KM-184 in all of our videos.
Thanks for great videos! It would be also very interesting to see a comparision between Martin HD-28 and Taylor 717.
The videos are always so short with only 1 minutes total of playing the guitars. Could you play for a minute longer and subtract a minute of talking if you're set on this short videos?
Here's one for you......two bowls of really good cereal. One you put fresh milk in and you let set for a minute before eating. Still taste great and has that crunch (D 28). Now you have bowl number 2 same cereal ....same milk but as soon as you pour the milk you dig in (HD 28). .....now I want a bowl of cereal mmmmmmm HD 28 style.
You can’t stop there. How about a D-18? Is that like lying on 12lb of uncooked bacon while a kitten pees on your kneecaps?
Up to the fifth Minute: well made to hear the différences between both, thanks!. But like you said, the mix/headphone.. will interfer and sometimes, in favor of one of the two. Here the HD28 sounds really more smoothy than the one i have since 30years .In an other video HD28 vs D35, the HD28 sounds really better and realistic than this one for exmple.
You didn't do one about a d35 and hd35🤔
The D-28 for me doesnt do it. It really needs the scallopped braces. The top really doesnt vibrate and it just makes for a disappointing experience when it comes to projection and base response. HD-28 folks.
I actually think the playing demo makes these guitars sound closer to each other. Kinda bang,hard strumming removes the nuance in this case.