Structural Theory | Castigliano's Second Theorem (Beam Deflection) Part 1 of 3

[@AJ-et3vf]

Thank you so much sir for this great lucid lecture about Castigliano's theorem using a simply supported beam with overhang as an example. I always struggled to get the correct answer for the deflection and slope when the beam is not a cantilevered one, such as simply supported beams. I don't know how the support reactions will contribute to the deflection at the point of interest. So this is really very useful to me. Thank you so much sir

[@nathananderson5042]

Very well-explained, thank you! Took me off guard when you added the deflections, but now it makes sense you are looking at the deflection at the end of the beam.

[@CONSIBS]

Thanks man, well explained!

[@juniorplay6152]

Thanks from Brazil 🇧🇷

[@emelinewayne3575]

very helpful, thank you so much sir.

[@mushavhanamadilugisani8099]

Thank you! It’s soo much clearer now! 😅

[@fitrahmayulu5690]

where did 4p get it from?
a

[@janineduannepelayo1991]

pano po nakuha yung 4p/3? sa may summation of moment at A po :)

[@champion7179]

How to find the deflection between B-C, I mean 3/2 m

[@nurinaina1650]

may i ask, what is R? like in RAY and RBY i knoe the ay and by but R?

[@adrienjoshua6710]

It's the same. R is just for "reaction".

[@fitrahmayulu5690]

4 p dapar dari mana?

[@DhirajJetithor]

Totrya avaj neet kadh Kay kalat nahiye!

[@josephclarke9279]

for ab the intergration =-1227.15 not -1248