Evidence must be evaluated by presuppositions. You should learn presupp in order to utilize evidence properly. To put the evidential approach over against presupp is to 1. misunderstand the distinction. 2. To put logic & science as independent of God (bad idea). 3. leaves with probability only, where presupp leaves apodictic certainty. 4. (etc...) Sproul should have learned presuppositional apologetics from Bahnsen and utilized it.
Love and respect both men greatly. They were both used by God mightily for the expansion of His Kingdom. That being said, Sproul could not keep up with Bahnsen. That is not a knock against Sproul in anyway. Bahnsen is in a league of his own when it comes to defending what he believes to be true.
Love both these guys but to eat RC’s lunch in this debate just shows the kind of intellectual chops Bahnsen had. Great discussion.
Evidence must be evaluated by presuppositions. You should learn presupp in order to utilize evidence properly. To put the evidential approach over against presupp is to 1. misunderstand the distinction. 2. To put logic & science as independent of God (bad idea). 3. leaves with probability only, where presupp leaves apodictic certainty. 4. (etc...) Sproul should have learned presuppositional apologetics from Bahnsen and utilized it.
Is that really what you took away from what RC said?
@@fndrr42 It is what follows rationally from his evidentialism.
Love and respect both men greatly. They were both used by God mightily for the expansion of His Kingdom. That being said, Sproul could not keep up with Bahnsen. That is not a knock against Sproul in anyway. Bahnsen is in a league of his own when it comes to defending what he believes to be true.
I wish I could here the people asking the questions it’s a bit muffled to be able to hear
It was a very poor recording. We did our best to clean it up prior to uploading.
54:37 bookmark
Sproul always
Sproul got buried!
Nah