The DM saw the character, and had an entire month to talk about any problem he had. But decided to be petty, and wait until the character was in the game before trashing him. What a child.
Exactly! Any even half-decent DM without an ego trip would find a way to not care or make your own supposed “ripped off OC” more diverse then that, it is on the DM. Not the players. If you can not find enjoyment in just RUNNING the game then you need more DM experience.
He is so mad about this perceived plagiarism. But from what we are told here, his campaign revolves around traveling around the world closing portals that connect our world to one that will destroy us..... That's the plot of the main story line in oblivion...
Oblivion, the first quarter of Dragon Age Inquisition, probably more too. HARDLY a new concept for a campaign, making the stealing accusations even more ironic
Astral Chain falls under this too but more “the world’s already been destroyed because of these portals so you have to defend the last place they haven’t destroyed”
One point for CritCrab; He mentioned his first character had died a month before to a Beholder. I think they are at the level where his backstory should be no problem.
Here to mention that, too. It's clear this isn't a first level character based everything about the set-up. Basically all the words crit crab read before making that comment.
@@skynyrdjesus well a beholder fight can be unwinnable for various party levels. A beholder in its lair is CR14 and that can make a level 9 party have a hard time. so unwinnable could still be level 6 or even 7. The player didn't come back until a month of sessions later. I assume that means 4 for once a week but it could be more, and if the sessions are long its possible they gained many levels. I can see a level 9 paladin having a lot of renown across the land which he did have, but not across several realms which I would expect out of a level 20 paladin. Nearing level 10 I would expect some form of renown greater than "they killed some monsters for some vilagers" and its possible the importance that his church places on him is disproportionate to his level as well, like they could expect him to face down a dragon and he might lose because their idea of him is more than he can live up to. There's a lot of nuance, or at least there can be, but I would say level 9 is powerful enough to have some specific notoriety or fame that his character had.
Slaying dragons is one thing but a lot of people are forgetting a lv1 adventurer is still a pretty powerful person compared to a commoner. There's the "Folk Hero" background for a reason, your character isn't fresh out of the womb nor are they picking up a sword for the first time. It's perfectly reasonable a church's champion would be, say, a level 3 paladin or seeing a level 1 fighter saying they are a commander, here's one of the options for the folk hero background: "Recruited into a lord's army, I rose to leadership and was commended for my heroism." This is what you *start* your character with at level 1. You could even slay a dragon and be at level 1 (if you disregard XP), maybe you were just a common guy whose city was being attacked by a dragon, you saw the men arming the ballista but they're already dead, you loose it and its a lucky shot. Your character still hasn't "gained experience" in a more real sense, they just loosened a ballista and it happened to land a killing blow. I feel like people often forget DnD adventurer's are extraordinary from the get go.
Guys I have this totally cool unique campaign. There's a chosen one with dragon powers set against the backdrop of a civil war between an empire and a... _southern_ Viking-themed region covered in snowy mountain peaks. It's in the south. It's totally original.
I definitely would have told everyone else in the party that hey , I was gonna play a couple more rounds , but I was told by the DM that I wasn't needed anymore.
I would have too. IF the player was already communicating his thoughts throughout the campaign. But he lost his right to voice his concerns THAT late into the campaign when he already allowed the DM to walk all over him
@@matthewcharles9813I feel like bad rpg horror story victims usually never call out stuff is usually for a few reason. Like they don’t think it’s a big deal, they don’t wanna risk dragging everyone else into the problem, etc. And especially in this story, op most likely just thought it would be useless. The damage is done. Kinda pointless to call out a problem that technically is already over, even if it wasn’t in your favor. Though I do agree OP should have done more, I don’t really blame them for not wanting to maybe just drag the situation on longer.
@@Rebell-mi4zuWhat gets me is that OP had already planned to be a petty bastard to close out his last few sessions. Why suddenly make it easier for that cunt of a DM, now that he's got officially nothing left to lose.
The DM didn't communicate about the supposed "OC" (seriously, what a joke) for several months. The player didn't communicate about the abuse, for, what, a year? This whole group is very bad at communicating.
Golden Paladin saying that they were comrades who should work together for righteousness, then threatening violence when laughed at by those 'comrades'. What a noble and holy paragon.
That could've also been worked into the character! Make them a "righteous hero" who is loved by all, but secretly a narci- oh wait... thats just Homelander.
Then again, there was a chance for and a want for a redemption arc of him actually becoming the hero everyone thinks he is. Homelander doesnt have that in the cards
The saddest thing is, the DM is most likely cheering within his own stupid little mind, thinking he actually accomplished something noteworthy, when all he likely did, was out himself as a whiny crybaby, and turned the table against him
@@shadowrose8907 Nope, but I CAN see it biting everyone INCLUDING him in the ass some day! The others KNOW he has a fragile ego and is willing to the game to air out real life drama and issues and now that he's "tasted blood" he is VERY likely to do it again to anyone that "displeases/slights him" and that's not going to end good for him when they have enough and/or he scares them all out! The table made it worse by NOT calling him out or stopping his bad behavior, so he now thinks it's OKAY to do it! He won the battle, but he's going to lose the war, and then he's going to blame EVERYONE but himself for "not stopping him when they should have!" This is the fate that awaits a BAD DM who gets away with bad behavior! When they realize "Karma for bad deeds doesn't exist" they get a sense of "Invincibility" which can lead to stuff like ONE EX DM I knew was a bully and a creep, thing was he chose a player who had both a "HAND" problem AND Anger Issues! So once he provoked him enough as he did others, he got a BEATING for his trouble! He never DM anymore and tends to "watch his words and actions" now. Fearful of it happening again (He played around and found out if you will)
One of my current DND characters is what people would call a “generic paladin” (literal golden Dragonborn with shiny armor and all) but I made her like this on purpose to contrast the edgier characters in the horror campaign we’re all in and I ham her up to the point where she comes off as cheesy for comedic purposes. It all depends on how you play the character and what context you use them in. Part of the fun of DnD is being able to put fresh spins on characters that may not have the most original concepts.
@@streakyanchovy Sorry, I did not mean to imply that archetypical characters are bad, more pointing out how ridiculous it is that the guy in the story somehow thought he was the first to come up with it.
@@kendrixhavlik3051 It’s okay. I wasn’t commenting with the intention of saying you were wrong or anything. I meant to say that the DM in this story was dumb to assume that just because OP’s character BG was fairly similar to their’s, (and we all know how popular the paladin in shining armor is) it doesn’t immediately mean that their character is a deliberate ripoff. From the sound of it, OP’s character is different enough from the DM’s, and if the DM has such a big problem about it, they could have said something upfront instead of being passive-aggressive. I definitely agree with what you’re saying here. My apologies if my original comment came off any other way.
How fragile of an ego you must have to consider any "Général character concept" as an attempt to steal your OC, and then bully said player with your "GM powers" until they quit by themselves.
The irony behind the GM's paladin lacking written narcissism is proven by how self absorbed the GM is about his character, GM just can't see past his rose-tinted glasses.
Not just that but "Big man in shiny armor who everyone loves" is the most generic and bland paladin design I've ever seen. Anyone trying out paladin or trying to get better at playing paladin has made a character just like that.
"My character is a shining heroic paladin" *Threatens PCs with physical violence if they don't obey him* DM's idea of a "good guy" invoking second-hand slavery upon his allies tells you all you need to know about this DM.
@@Fl0wchart something I failed to note with my initial comment: not only did the GM bully OP for presumed plagiarism, he also made it clear he was never okay with the party's anti-hero approach to his campaign from the start, opting the stick over the carrot to put them on the route of "altruism".
It sounds like the party was Guardians of the Galaxy and the DM decided they needed to be policed by "Superman as described by people who have never actually read/watched Superman"
Apparently, this group has been playing the anti-hero playstyle for a while before OP's first character died, so I don't think the DM had a problem with the playstyle at all. I think he just felt personally slighted and decided he was gonna bring his own "OC" in. The only reason the focus became lawful good is because the OC was lawful good and he played the character like that. And "Paladin in Gold armor" is borderline cliché at this point. It's not bad, but it's definitely something that already exists.
Problem is the DM using the dmpc hero to force everyone to act like him. Even if they’d do that that’s just annoying and a band of shady people isn’t gonna let that slide but the players did. The players were accommodating but the DM wasnt
Our groups would usually drop a NPC if it was too powerful, they are supposed to be background characters, usually not take part in battles and when they do, they just support or take evade actions unless told to do something by some PC
I hate the stories where the bully wins, so open comment for the DM because I need to get this out: Congrats for canonising your golden boy OC as a bully with a fragile ego
The moment he starts putting his hand on his sword as a threat is the point where I would full on call him out on not being the hero he presents himself as. I’d just tell him “go ahead. Strike me down and prove I’m right.”
@@animeotaku307My thoughts exactly. It's baffling how many of these Tiny Dong Energy DMs think that a "heroic" character would openly threaten violence against their own party. That's not how ANY of that works...
@@animeotaku307 I wonder what oath golden boy was. An Oath that allows the Chaotic Good action of threatening violence on people who jeer each other? A lot of Oaths probably wouldn't like attacking people like that
Not only is this person weirdly vindictive and paranoid, but they're also a bad DM. Giving your team useful NPCs is one thing, but your players lose all agency if every problem they encounter is hand-waved by a tag-along NPC. Also, like, threatening violence at the drop of a hat when someone does something you don't like isn't the heroic flex you think it is, my dude.
Coercion via threat of potential violence is literally one of the least morally good things you could do, especially for something extremely trivial like "which path should we take".
Yeah, if I have NPC's that are skilled and tag along with the party I try to make anything that they do that is helpful give a bonus to the players to actually solve the problem. Tracking a monster? The hunter with you can give you a +2 to your survival skill check if you ask him for help. Keeps the players firmly in the Main Characters slot while making certain NPC's more likable. DMPC's are always done with so little thought, and also those thoughts never include the DM's players in the thoughts.
DMPC:"That is no way to be comrades, we have to work together!" Also DMPC: threatens the party with physical violence anytime they don't blindly follow his directives
what i find interesting about this tale is that the DMPC reveals some true narcissistic qualities of the DM's personality. The supposed stolen paladin behaving more selfishly despite his renowned status acts as an interesting mirror to the DM that behaves selfishly while playing a heroic character.
The funny thing is that if OP and DM had actually collaborated and consented to it, a plot line surrounding two nearly identical golden knights but one is a narcissistic tool the people have disdain for while the other is truly a beloved hero of the people has alot of potential for a good storyline.
Personally going that route I'd probably have the tool one as the famous one because he spent so much time on marketing while the actually good one didn't care about his reputation and just helped people.
Two people can easily make similar characters just by chance alone. This DM was guilty of a pointless overreaction. The DM also acted like a spoiled child.
Oh yeah For one of the games I play in another player and I both independently showed up to session zero with a half-elf/half-elf passing charisma caster (bard/sorcerer and sorcerer) with the acolyte background, parental issues, forced to hide or repress their magic for personal safety, a comfortable but heavily regimented upbringing and a knack for finding trouble due to the campaign being their first taste of freedom. And you know? They still felt like completely different people, because one was naive and inexperienced while the other was rebellious and wild. For context we're both LGBTQ and live in the American South so of course we're gonna make these types of characters lmao
@@ablunt-headedtreesnake6094 Same archetype, different people. Who would have imagined? XD And you're both LGBTQ too, that's honestly kind of funny. I'm LGBTQ as well, the T in LGBTQ.
"There are only seven stories, and they've all been told already." Someone's already come up with the same idea you have, no matter how original you think your idea is - so long you can put your own spin on it and make it unique to you, that's what matters.
Player tries to steal wagon wheel from innocent travelers. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player* Player angrily haggles with shopkeeper who's clearly overpricing. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player* Player gives half of their loaf of bread to a hungry child. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player* I'm joking around, but seriously. The railroading was off the hook and the Paladin was threatening them so much, it's a wonder why they're not an Oathbreaker or Evil.
@@cosmicspacething3474even if that character is somehow accurately LN and backs every "I'm the law" with credible violence threats, I just don't get how the fuck the party didn't just dump him or fought him. So much boring overbearing nonsense and not a single "lol bring it" against an *NPC*, it's not even pvp
The Golden Hero is a trope in fairy tales and fiction, the DM Golden Knight isn’t the only or first Golden Knight out there, they have different backstories with OP wanting to do something different and make the Golden Hero a selfish narcissist who learns care for other and what his title really means. All to say DM characters not that Original of an idea, and ruining a campaign over petty jealousy isn’t cool.
If he'd wanted to, he could have even made the golden rivalry a fun story arc, or an actually valuable lesson, or growth motivation. Instead, he just set out to out-narcissist the narcissist.
Yep. There was OP's mistake. He made up an excuse instead of telling DM to his face "this sucks, you're a prick, your OC is stupid, I'm out" or going full Old Man Henderson. Never give the bullies the opportunity to win that easy. I hope the other players left DM to his DMPC all by himself.
I just usually play as Hodic the Sedgenog. He’s a marine coloured anthropomorphic porcupine who can go super fast and loves Chilly Dogs. Original Character. Do NOT steal.
In the game I am currently in there is an NPC of a former player's character that is a blue colored tabaxi named Sanic, or at least that is what he calls himself. He is clinically insane, his official home address is a mental institution, and believes he is a hedgehog.
Turned out the character was accidenatlly a perfect recreation of his DM. A golden knight who is secretly a narcissist who veils his terrible personality with passive aggressive "heroic" talk. Guess DM looked into the mirror and didn't like what he saw...
Sadly, while it was stated by op that the character resembling the DM's oc was pure coincidence. They may have inadvertently created a perfect recreation. Narcissistic, arrogant, and rude? Yep, sounds like this DM's unoriginal self insert to me.
I genuinely don't know why OP didn't talk to the other players earlier. They could have ditched the DMPC way earlier and continue without him. Or if the DM always return him, take him on his challenge and don't let him bully them into moral submission, especially if all the group was morally grey. And finally, fight him if necessary. Might have ended the campaign, but at least the players would have stayed together.
Yeah seriously. The first time this "Golden Paladin" gripped his sword in an intimidation tactic, I would have rolled an attack against him on principle. No self-respecting adventurer will just let some dude tagging along coerce them through threat of violence to do what they want.
I don't want to victim blame but..yeah OP had all the chances to call out this BS but he didn't. It does not matter how good the roleplay is. If you do not like something - SAY IT.
“Do things my way or I will hurt you.” Yeah that’s totally a way to build teamwork. Sounds like he could use some golden earplugs to go with his golden armor.
Well that's 20 minutes of my life I'm not getting back. Instead of standing up for themselves they just let the dm bully them into leaving. Was anyone at the table even their friend? No one stood for them?
Exactly, I came away from this story pissed, I don't even blame OP at all but wow nobody stood up to the DM's terrible behavior and told him to get a life and stop being so petty?!
I agree 100%. Why did these important conversations happen behind closed doors? If it is clear to both you and other players that you are being railroaded, bring it up to the table. A very frustrating end to this story.
I blame OP for not standing up and calling DM out in front of the other players. I blame the players for letting this BS go on. Everybody sucks here but DM is just the worst
I do think they did act a bit spineless. The DM acted like a little child despite being an adult. And the other adults just let the DM walk all over them
"I made an original character!" "Original eh? Tell me about them." "Well they're-" "It's been done." "... But I haven't told you anything about them yet." "IT'S BEEN DONE."
The funny thing is, this isn't even really a case of "everything has been done," the GM's TOTALLY ORIGINAL character was just exactly the stereotypical paladin.
I remember, a few years ago. I was in VC with friends, doing a raid in GW2. Then, I get called a "whore" by the best friend of one of my friends (I don't remember WHY she called me that, but I sure as hell remember not being rude and not deserving this. Maybe I said something she didn't like, idk). What did my friend do? She called her best friend out, because that's what friends do! She even pressured her best friend to apologise (I got a fauxpology lol).
I left a group because whenever i needed help nobody even moved a finger, when i was always there for them whenever i could Better to be alone than around false friends
if I was OP after the first fight where the enemies were focusing only on me and constantly hitting despite my high AC I would've asked the DM right there at the table: "do you have some sort of grudge against me? because it seems like you're fudging quite a few rolls just to screw me over, not to mention the unnecessary checks for trivial things that have humiliating results when I fail them" and then demanded that any future combat rolls he makes are done out in the open for the party to see, just to make sure he's calling them right
@@thegreendragoninn8730 furthermore he should've told the other players what the DM told him and had them conspire to kick the DMPC out of the party and force the DM to stop bullying OP
It's pretty easy. I say this aa someone that used to let a lot of shite slide because I didn't have the social skills to know how to handle them in even semi appropriate ways where I also wouldn't jus get immediately shit down and ignored. (technically I still struggle with that, I just adopted an attitude that if people don't want to listen I'll sink the entire ship to spite one person. LoL) I still often struggle because I'm the type people tend immediately assume they can walk all over then they get all upsetti spaghetti mello dramatic when that doesn't work. Sometimes if I can just don't feel the person is worth any of my emotional investment (and I can be rather emotionally lazy, it's why I don't hate people. Too much like work that is,) I'll let it slide for a while before just quietly packing my stuff and leaving everyone on read. Not the most mature way, but that's usually when I'm just too apathetic about the situation, and he person(s) hassling me to bother caring. By that point ive long since checked out. Especially if I tried to actually communicate beforehand. But I can do that because while I easily form attachments to people, they're easily severed with no real harm to me done. @@thegreendragoninn8730
@@thegreendragoninn8730 The ever common trap people can walk into of being unwilling to rock the boat due to the difficulty of getting into a game causing them to 'stick it out' through any bullshit in the vain hope of it passing. The old 'No D&D is better than bad D&D' mantra is something every player needs to know.
Having a character who gets disrespected by everyone can be fun, if that is what the player was going for. I had a wizard (actually arcane domain cleric, but she introduced herself as a wizard) who would constantly brag about her amazing magical abilities, and that she would use them to conquer the Swordcoast, but who nobody takes her seriously, because she looks like a completely normal peasant woman. I even dumpstatted Charisma so I failed more checks. But that was what the character was supposed to be. People prostrating themselves in front of the future wizard queen would have been equally as unfun as disrespecting the paladin.
On your 1st point against the player, since we don't know what level the party is, since it's something like 12ish sessions in when he comes back with the newly rolled up character, he may actually supposed to be at a level of said magnitude.
Yeah I felt the same, like he glossed over that fact to try and appeal to both sides in the story. I don't know, but it seemed like a bit of an oversight.
And I think the player said that the character has the fame because of the seemingly selfless deed he's done and because the church/temple prop him up as their representative, and has political angle on that. So it make sense if people see him as a celebrity based on that reputation and rumor, even if the character isn't an all powerful being and just good at what he's doing.
I think crab just genuinely had a brain fart and didn’t really think about that. I do think the character concept is maybe a LITTLE too grandiose and dickish and maybe not a party member I would totally love to have, but it doesn’t sound too outlandishly accomplished for a party that seems to be at a high enough level that they’re well known as “heroes” saving the world from demon portals or whatever.
5:57 I mean, if the last fight was a Beholder and a month has passed with more sessions to be had, I definitely think this isn’t level one. Maybe level 6, most likely levels 8 or 9, so increase the level by one it is a character most likely from level 7 to 10.
There were only two possibilities for this DM: 1) He was fudging his rolls to punish the 'plagardin' 2) The even WORSE posibility that he designed all his encounters/monsters to be anti-paladin(This lizard warrior is weilding a +4 Spear of Paladin Smiting, why to you ask?)
"Elected by the church to be their face. Backs up his talk with skills. The people love him. Selfless hero. He's a fuckin' douche though" That's not an OC, that's Homelander. Seriously. Change "church" to "megacorp" and "paladin" to superhero.
You could do this to literally any character? I can promise you if this is enough for you to not consider it an "OC" then you have never created anything original in your life, even outside of characters.
@@ledrid6956agreed. All the people just saying “lmao it’s just homelander” are missing the point. The story isn’t REALLY about the character itself and how original/unoriginal he is; it’s about the DM mistakenly believing that OP stole his character when the parallels between them are just generic, surface level coincidences, and then bullying OP for it. Nothing is really “original” anymore. Something is always based off of something else. If something being inspired by another thing or sharing similarities to something else is enough to make these people roll their eyes, idk how they enjoy anything. It’s like looking at a game like Hat in Time, seeing the character wears a hat, jumps on platforms, and collects shiny things, and completely discounting it as being “just Mario”
DM: My OC is such a kind and virtuous knight of the light!!!!!! Also DM: [has his OC *literally threaten the party with his sword whenever they don't do what he wants*]
Its kind of wild to me how bad in all TTRPG stories people are at confrontation. "Ok so everyone agrees with me the DM is being a jackass, right?" "Right!" "And he's making it so none of us have fun, right?" "Right!" "So we're gonna confront him, right?!" *general incoherent mumbling and shuffling of character sheets*
There HAS to be an update to this. Like, how did their friends react when they were told to just not come back? How would you justify that as a friend?
It bafles me any of the other players could deal with that looser of a DM. Seriously no one speask out for a friend? The entire groups sucks, they are all awfull.
This channel seems so simple, a crab reading dnd horror stories, but i love it so much lmao. Its calming, interesting, great background noise, amazing not background noise, continuously resparks my passion for dnd, and probably more things i cant think of right now. Good job Mr Crabs 🦀
Being replaced... by a DMPC...and then kicked out because your spot is already taken/stolen by the DMPC... Wow. Dick move. Probably better to leave because that DM sounds incredibly petty and annoying to deal with. Shame about the rest of the group but fuck that DM...
Jeez, all that the DM needed to do to prevent his OC from being "stolen" was just to tell the player "your character is a bit too similar to an NPC I'm going to bring in later", and the player could have re-written the character to be themed around silver or bronze instead of gold or something.
I run a game set on the ocean. My players have a bunch of NPCs aboard their ship who can fight alongside them if needed, as well as provide a number of other day to day services. They were, however, selected by the players and ultimately answer to the player characters. They're basically glorified henchmen who have the occasional quest hook if it's a slow session. Never in my wildest dreams could I imagine them taking over for the party.
@@jaffarebellion292 damn right! Well done, that’s a good system. My players tried to make one of my campaigns into one piece once haha, large ships always remind me of that.
I think the big moment for him should, in fact, be "So, let me get this straight. You made an NPC to do my job for me? Okay....bye. Hey players? I' gonna be running a few modules..."
Man the dm really looked at the phrase «never change a winning team» and decided that he would do the opposite. Like the party seemed to be functioning quite well before the DMPC decided to muck it up.
I'm surprised the rest of the party didn't talk to the DM as well, they clearly saw what was happening and chose not to address it. That's shitty behavior as well.
Ah, the *better* golden paladin is definitely more heroic for *threatening people to go along with him* if they don't divert their path. Like did everyone else hear the part of him putting his hand on his hilt while he spoke?
Your timing couldn't be better, Crab King. This morning I learned my father-in-law passed away, and am now frantically cleaning my house before a friend comes over to take care of the cats this weekend. Absolutely nothing better than a new Crit Crab video when I'm cleaning. 💜 Edit: WOW this DM is complete shit. He's so lucky to have players that tolerate him.
Ya i do sympathize with you Crab i honestly tell my players at the begining that i dont run evil games. Crime literally doesnt pay in my games for heroes because it encourages crime not heroics. It also is not the adventure i prepared. 19:57
"And then he's level one" He's a replacement for a character in a seemingly already well-leveled party, so no, he would actually have to be pretty strong and accomplished.
I once had a player pull some character art off the internet for what they were wearing when they went to meet a very important npc... And they chose the SAME character as a reference as I had for the npc they were going to meet with, neither of us knowing beforehand. Not quite the same thing, but I took the opportunity and rolled with it, and the npc said "Is this supposed to be some kind of joke?" and it turned into an ice-breaker for RP. It was pretty funny. ...Anyway that NPC was Satan, and they're married now, but that's beside the point.
Most problems that happened at my table was because of me (the baby dm) not putting my foot down enough or not being clear enough. Communication is key. I talked it out with everyone and it went way better than before, and non of them minded my mess ups. They even liked my DM OCs which is my biggest accomplishment :3 (They even asked if they would see them again because they liked them so much hehe)
Oh damn this dm wasn't named Ian was he? I swear my last dm was as bad as this except it wasn't because I copied a character of his, but after converting my elven ranger into a cleric I reduced my character's back stoiry to answering a call for aid from her son and he proceeded to crap all ove rmy character killing off said npc and when confronted with the fact a mother wouldn't abandon her child he told me to change my character! I ran the next game and in 15 minutes demonstrated how a true introductory game is run (yes he claimed his game was an introduction which it wasn't as I turned up in at least their second or third session.) Making me reroll saves employing exhaustion rules that had I been more knowledgeably about 5e back then would have meant my character sitting out the rest of that adventure! I didn't know so when we confront the villain of that one shot it turned out to be an orc warchief that I narrowly avoided being killed distracting him from the others in the first round by DODGING. He took over his wife's character who narrowly avoided hitting the party transmuter with a firebolt due to a critical fumble before fumbling again dropping my character. To put it bluntly unless he went with some really appalling dm fiat that was a Total Party Kill had he run that properly because none of the survivors would have survived as long as my character had. I decided to quit that online game early and learned later they revived my character despite there being no way they could have won that fight against 3 orcs and orc warchief. In response to his first game with me my one was set on Exandria establishing its an entirely different world to his and that my character was banished to his world suffering temporary amnesia as a result. Unfortunately his one shots got so bad he got "bored" and decided his campaign was also set on Exandria which it couldn't after that session I called him and after realising I was wasting my time and rather upset as this had been a friend (who clearly was nothing of the sort) quit the group even shutting down facebook and not returning as I was really pissed off at his behaviour. All he had to do was ask as I was trying to shift my campaign off of Exandria because I thought my players wasn't interested. The truth is I suspect they knew of his growing nastiness and used me to distract him from them given he liked to play favourites wasn't hard to udnerstand except they used to be much better roleplayers and now one literally ran away from a roleplaying situation rather than run his character properly. Sorry this video gave me flashbacks from back then almost three years ago now. Back to watching the video now.
You have two types of DMs. Ones who railroad the feck out of things and get petty and insert DMPCs to be a-holes. And then you have ones like my main DM. "You want to free Tiamat from the cult and save her? GIVE ME A WEEK AND WE'LL DO THIS, LADS!"
You mentioned that the OPs character might be an over accomplished for their level and I don't think that's actually true. Like there's always room for it sure, but contextually speaking the OP mentioned that the fight that caused his original character to die was against a Beholder. Assuming the DM isn't just throwing high level monsters at a low level party, a Beholder is a CR 13 monster, they're still pretty high up there on the list of dangerous enemies. So it makes sense to me that the replacement character, assuming they were the same level as the party, would be someone who had some accomplishments under their belt. It seems to me like the OP didn't really mention the kind of things that the paladin had done personally, just that they were something of a figurehead for the order that they belonged too, like a pretty face to put on posters and stuff to make people want to trust them.
When sheep unfortunately have something over you when they're acting scummy, don't tell them your plans or expect pity or mercy. Do what you need to do even if it's in secret.
Gave me flashbacks to the lawful stupid paladin that went into a battle knowing beforehand it was unfair and rallied the group to kick the DM out over the unfair encounter
I literally stole the characters of Madness Combat, Borderlands, and Skyrim. I put them into my game, changed their races and how they act a bit to make them more appropriate for the setting, and they are some of the favorite characters in my campaign. It's not bad to take from popular media and put them into your own setting. The problems only come from saying they are completely original and not based off a common idea or a piece of media.
Got to suggest that, if this tale is true, the DM probably had an issue with the player predating the paladin situation. After all his fighter was the only character who got killed in the early sessions
Communication is a two way street. The DM may have not been "mature enough to discuss his feelings" with the player, but the player also didn't bring it up even when it started escalating. He tried to explain himself once and then just gave up and kept playing despite the abuse? Damn, that must have been some legendary tier roleplay because I certainly wouldn't have stuck around. He should have talked to the party members to see if they were noticing the same trends and then more consistently spoken to the DM about his concerns. I dunno, if this were an AITAH post I'd vote ESH to varying degrees.
THIS is the comment I was looking for. Despite everything the player saying the DM did bad being fair and valid. - DM was upset with my character before I played it but I thought screw him - I didn't know what was happening but didn't want to bring it up. The DM sounds very petty and a hard work, but clearly he put together a great campaign for them because they were enjoying it for months, maybe a bit of respect earlier on would have stopped the escalation.
@@MadMalManoh so you think faking rolls and also stomping on a players character for no good reason also completely ruined a game for his players being fair and valid this just sounds like a person having a power trip thinking all that matters is his enjoyment
@velocirex3984 - The first line in my comment was that the player was correct in what they said, the rest of my comment highlighted that they willfully avoided communicating with the DM. Your comment just spoke on my behalf, well done you literally just did what half the stories condemn childish people for.
im sorry but id very much explode on the guy and call him out at every aspect, legit removing half of the roleplay because your OC wants them to be good is just horrible DMing. Whats that, dont agree with my OC? Threatens you with his sword so you ahve to do it his way, honestly the last part started to feel like he was heavily railroading, was really hoping the party pushed him into the valcano
What's even worse is it seams like the railroading only happened because the DM didn't like OP. Punishing people for something someone else did is already horrible, but especially when that someone else didn't even do what you say they did, it just becomes even worse.
@HOLDENPOPE agreed yea, legit ive dealt with railroading before and i hate it. (This was a pokemon mystery dungeon dnd) Dm gives us a choice to go to the next dungeon to uncover more of the mystery were solving, or stay in stay for a bit and restock our items. We decided to stay and restock only to have the dungeons boss appear in town wrecking havoc, we didn't get to restock and didn't get to visit that dungeon.
5:35 The context is right there. This is a character made to join the existing party, hence starting at a higher level. Reminder that even a handful of levels are usually way above the scope of most normal people too, and they mentioned most people outside of that church might not know the character.
It's bad enough that the other players let DM ruin the roleplay, but the fact that OP let all this happen to him without once calling the DM out on his blatant cheating and targeting boggles my mind. Why would anyone allow themselves to be such a doormat? Is there another side to this? Because If i saw my DM targeting another player you can bet I (and likely the rest of my table) would call them out on it publicly
Imagine thinking a heroic character would use threat of violence to force their will on their party. Totally an upstanding paragon of virtue... Also, after all those supposed crits, and repeated hits against my character like OP faced, I'd be demanding the DM roll openly to prove he isn't cheating maliciously.
A friend made an Original Character do not steal (as we joke about it) that pretty much made him a wolf (or if it was bear) mutant with the exact powers as Wolverine minus the metal skeleton.
Could it be possible that DM introduced his OC as a foil to OP's character? Maybe the DM was expecting them to fight back against his relentless do-gooder-ness. instead of cowering and backing down every time the OC gripped his sword. If this is what the DM planned, targeting and downing the OP in combat so often was no way to do it... and after hearing the end, it seems like it was actually malicious. But, as players, you have agency. If all of your characters were annoyed by the OC in RP, why not work together to find a way to ditch him/get rid of him? Basically find a way in-game to tell your DM "this isn't the type of game we want". Or straight up talk to your DM and say that the OC is spoiling some of the fun? Like he said, they are all adults. I'm just saying, the poor communication was going both ways.
"If the DM can't be mature enough to tell me his problems, then I don't care." If you realized the dm was having an issue with something, why didn't you bring it up immediately? You wanna sit there and act like the DM was the only one having trouble communicating. This whole situation could've been nipped before your character was fully built. I get that your DM is pretty goofy for getting pissed off over nothing, but if you realized he was upset, why didn't you as a friend speak up?
The DM saw the character, and had an entire month to talk about any problem he had. But decided to be petty, and wait until the character was in the game before trashing him. What a child.
Exactly! Any even half-decent DM without an ego trip would find a way to not care or make your own supposed “ripped off OC” more diverse then that, it is on the DM. Not the players. If you can not find enjoyment in just RUNNING the game then you need more DM experience.
It also wasn't just sprung on the DM in game either. He knew about it and could have said something before it even got to the table.
@@evilbob840 💯🎯
Ok doki
Any DM who approves a character then complains about it when they join the game is a loser
"You stole my original character."
*original character is the most generic good guy imaginable.*
Not only generic, that's like, the template of what the class itself is.
and that's fine tbh
ik some of my OCs are generic
but i'm not gonna hunt others because they "stole" my oc
Crazy that DM invented the standard for paladins. He must be very old.
@@informitas0117 maybe he invented dnd as well
@@GarkKahn When they say "Wizards of the Coast", they're talking about him
He was the Coast all along
The funniest thing is that the "secretly narcissistic and flawed" part isn't referring to OP's character, its referring to this sad DM.
That's a good point. DM wasn't offended because the character mocked his precious Good Boi OC. DM felt like it mocke *HIM*.
it's not a secret 😂
All of the sudden OPs flaws don’t seem as heavy. They were overshadowed by another’s.
⁴4⁴in ⁴room⁴⁴4😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅@@tobiasaibot1317
He is so mad about this perceived plagiarism. But from what we are told here, his campaign revolves around traveling around the world closing portals that connect our world to one that will destroy us.....
That's the plot of the main story line in oblivion...
I was thinking the same thing haha. Maybe if you don't want someone accidentally stealing your character, don't make something so generic?
Oblivion, the first quarter of Dragon Age Inquisition, probably more too. HARDLY a new concept for a campaign, making the stealing accusations even more ironic
It's also the plot to Dragon Age Inquisition. A nearly 10 year old game now.
It's also the story of Rift
Astral Chain falls under this too but more “the world’s already been destroyed because of these portals so you have to defend the last place they haven’t destroyed”
One point for CritCrab; He mentioned his first character had died a month before to a Beholder. I think they are at the level where his backstory should be no problem.
Here to mention that, too. It's clear this isn't a first level character based everything about the set-up. Basically all the words crit crab read before making that comment.
Well, it was also apparently an unwinnable battle with a beholder, so it's entirely possible the party was still fairly low level.
@@skynyrdjesus well a beholder fight can be unwinnable for various party levels. A beholder in its lair is CR14 and that can make a level 9 party have a hard time. so unwinnable could still be level 6 or even 7. The player didn't come back until a month of sessions later. I assume that means 4 for once a week but it could be more, and if the sessions are long its possible they gained many levels. I can see a level 9 paladin having a lot of renown across the land which he did have, but not across several realms which I would expect out of a level 20 paladin. Nearing level 10 I would expect some form of renown greater than "they killed some monsters for some vilagers" and its possible the importance that his church places on him is disproportionate to his level as well, like they could expect him to face down a dragon and he might lose because their idea of him is more than he can live up to. There's a lot of nuance, or at least there can be, but I would say level 9 is powerful enough to have some specific notoriety or fame that his character had.
@@skynyrdjesus but presumably not a first level. At the lowest they'd be upper single digits otherwise the beholder fight would have been a quick tpk.
Slaying dragons is one thing but a lot of people are forgetting a lv1 adventurer is still a pretty powerful person compared to a commoner. There's the "Folk Hero" background for a reason, your character isn't fresh out of the womb nor are they picking up a sword for the first time. It's perfectly reasonable a church's champion would be, say, a level 3 paladin or seeing a level 1 fighter saying they are a commander, here's one of the options for the folk hero background:
"Recruited into a lord's army, I rose to leadership and was commended for my heroism."
This is what you *start* your character with at level 1. You could even slay a dragon and be at level 1 (if you disregard XP), maybe you were just a common guy whose city was being attacked by a dragon, you saw the men arming the ballista but they're already dead, you loose it and its a lucky shot. Your character still hasn't "gained experience" in a more real sense, they just loosened a ballista and it happened to land a killing blow.
I feel like people often forget DnD adventurer's are extraordinary from the get go.
"Waaahhhhh, you're stealing my completely unique OC"
Meanwhile the DM is blatantly just copying the plot of Elder Scrolls Oblivion
😂
Crazy have similar elements in your campagin makes it a rip off, dumbass
Guys I have this totally cool unique campaign. There's a chosen one with dragon powers set against the backdrop of a civil war between an empire and a... _southern_ Viking-themed region covered in snowy mountain peaks. It's in the south. It's totally original.
A well known powerful hero who is privately a massive, ill tempered narcissist jackass is not an original character, it's Homelander.
Exactly what I thought
It's actually such and old trope.
Homelander, and the/an antagonist of basically every other modern Isekai anime
or gabriel ultrakill.
Remember Ozymandias from the Watchmen
"We needed to replace a wheel on our horse (don't ask)"
Leaving us hanging like that is just cruel.
I bet it was a prosthetic leg replacement wheel because they ran out of food in the middle of nowhere.
I was REALLY hoping for a postscript from OP explaining that, due to people asking anyway
I definitely would have told everyone else in the party that hey , I was gonna play a couple more rounds , but I was told by the DM that I wasn't needed anymore.
Agreed. Drives me crazy how the victim just doesn't call them out.
I would have too. IF the player was already communicating his thoughts throughout the campaign. But he lost his right to voice his concerns THAT late into the campaign when he already allowed the DM to walk all over him
@@matthewcharles9813I feel like bad rpg horror story victims usually never call out stuff is usually for a few reason. Like they don’t think it’s a big deal, they don’t wanna risk dragging everyone else into the problem, etc.
And especially in this story, op most likely just thought it would be useless. The damage is done. Kinda pointless to call out a problem that technically is already over, even if it wasn’t in your favor.
Though I do agree OP should have done more, I don’t really blame them for not wanting to maybe just drag the situation on longer.
@@Rebell-mi4zuWhat gets me is that OP had already planned to be a petty bastard to close out his last few sessions.
Why suddenly make it easier for that cunt of a DM, now that he's got officially nothing left to lose.
The DM didn't communicate about the supposed "OC" (seriously, what a joke) for several months.
The player didn't communicate about the abuse, for, what, a year?
This whole group is very bad at communicating.
Golden Paladin saying that they were comrades who should work together for righteousness, then threatening violence when laughed at by those 'comrades'.
What a noble and holy paragon.
That could've also been worked into the character! Make them a "righteous hero" who is loved by all, but secretly a narci- oh wait... thats just Homelander.
Me after hearing the description of the paladin:
"You're playing Homelander."
“We can’t just rush in”
“I’m the paladin and I’ll do whatever the fuck I want”
Then again, there was a chance for and a want for a redemption arc of him actually becoming the hero everyone thinks he is. Homelander doesnt have that in the cards
You just discovred Garth Ennis isn't a very original writer 💀
@@faisalhussain2270 why, because someone else copied him? 😂
@@Nerobyrne No because the Homelander trait isn't new by any means
The saddest thing is, the DM is most likely cheering within his own stupid little mind, thinking he actually accomplished something noteworthy, when all he likely did, was out himself as a whiny crybaby, and turned the table against him
"Yaaaay my totally awesome mary sue is winning and his character is losing in this game where I can make up all the rules, tee hee"
I mean, apparently the table didn't DO anything despite knowing what a petty child the DM was being, so did they really even turn against him?
@@shadowrose8907 Nope, but I CAN see it biting everyone INCLUDING him in the ass some day! The others KNOW he has a fragile ego and is willing to the game to air out real life drama and issues and now that he's "tasted blood" he is VERY likely to do it again to anyone that "displeases/slights him" and that's not going to end good for him when they have enough and/or he scares them all out! The table made it worse by NOT calling him out or stopping his bad behavior, so he now thinks it's OKAY to do it!
He won the battle, but he's going to lose the war, and then he's going to blame EVERYONE but himself for "not stopping him when they should have!" This is the fate that awaits a BAD DM who gets away with bad behavior! When they realize "Karma for bad deeds doesn't exist" they get a sense of "Invincibility" which can lead to stuff like ONE EX DM I knew was a bully and a creep, thing was he chose a player who had both a "HAND" problem AND Anger Issues! So once he provoked him enough as he did others, he got a BEATING for his trouble! He never DM anymore and tends to "watch his words and actions" now. Fearful of it happening again (He played around and found out if you will)
@@shadowrose8907a lot of times players just kinda stay quite mostly because it’s rlly ducking awkward to speak up against your dm.
@@spend03 You mean the hobby is riddled with gutless cowards.
The funniest thing about this is that the suppedly "stolen" character concept is just "Generic Paladin"
Literally cardboard cut of a character T_T like dude I couldn't possibly handle that level of cringe from a DM
One of my current DND characters is what people would call a “generic paladin” (literal golden Dragonborn with shiny armor and all) but I made her like this on purpose to contrast the edgier characters in the horror campaign we’re all in and I ham her up to the point where she comes off as cheesy for comedic purposes.
It all depends on how you play the character and what context you use them in. Part of the fun of DnD is being able to put fresh spins on characters that may not have the most original concepts.
@@streakyanchovy Sorry, I did not mean to imply that archetypical characters are bad, more pointing out how ridiculous it is that the guy in the story somehow thought he was the first to come up with it.
@@kendrixhavlik3051 It’s okay. I wasn’t commenting with the intention of saying you were wrong or anything.
I meant to say that the DM in this story was dumb to assume that just because OP’s character BG was fairly similar to their’s, (and we all know how popular the paladin in shining armor is) it doesn’t immediately mean that their character is a deliberate ripoff.
From the sound of it, OP’s character is different enough from the DM’s, and if the DM has such a big problem about it, they could have said something upfront instead of being passive-aggressive.
I definitely agree with what you’re saying here. My apologies if my original comment came off any other way.
How fragile of an ego you must have to consider any "Général character concept" as an attempt to steal your OC, and then bully said player with your "GM powers" until they quit by themselves.
@@Juju2927 OP tried to go out ceremoniously, and GM had the last laugh by kicking him on the logic that he's replaced.
ohhh did you put those és because you didn't wanna be flagged as a bot?
@@erikdahl6861 I'm french, my auto correct put them since it's the same word than english but with those.
@@Juju2927 ah, okay, that makes more sense. good to know!
"YOU STOLE MY COMMENT IDEA!!!11!!!1!"
Dude. OP wanted to play d&d Homelander, and DM said, “no but Homelander isn’t bad!”
The irony behind the GM's paladin lacking written narcissism is proven by how self absorbed the GM is about his character, GM just can't see past his rose-tinted glasses.
Rofl true
I was going to post exactly that but not going to now since I don't want to steal your idea
Not just that but "Big man in shiny armor who everyone loves" is the most generic and bland paladin design I've ever seen. Anyone trying out paladin or trying to get better at playing paladin has made a character just like that.
"My character is a shining heroic paladin"
*Threatens PCs with physical violence if they don't obey him*
DM's idea of a "good guy" invoking second-hand slavery upon his allies tells you all you need to know about this DM.
@@Fl0wchart something I failed to note with my initial comment: not only did the GM bully OP for presumed plagiarism, he also made it clear he was never okay with the party's anti-hero approach to his campaign from the start, opting the stick over the carrot to put them on the route of "altruism".
It sounds like the party was Guardians of the Galaxy and the DM decided they needed to be policed by "Superman as described by people who have never actually read/watched Superman"
Funny enough the GotG video game.
Apparently, this group has been playing the anti-hero playstyle for a while before OP's first character died, so I don't think the DM had a problem with the playstyle at all. I think he just felt personally slighted and decided he was gonna bring his own "OC" in. The only reason the focus became lawful good is because the OC was lawful good and he played the character like that. And "Paladin in Gold armor" is borderline cliché at this point. It's not bad, but it's definitely something that already exists.
Well, the DM invented Paladins by himself, so of course he wanted to play one even if he happens to DM as well.
At this point everything is based on other stuff
But some characters are more cliché than others
Problem is the DM using the dmpc hero to force everyone to act like him. Even if they’d do that that’s just annoying and a band of shady people isn’t gonna let that slide but the players did. The players were accommodating but the DM wasnt
Not borderline, it is a cliché.
Our groups would usually drop a NPC if it was too powerful, they are supposed to be background characters, usually not take part in battles and when they do, they just support or take evade actions unless told to do something by some PC
I hate the stories where the bully wins, so open comment for the DM because I need to get this out:
Congrats for canonising your golden boy OC as a bully with a fragile ego
The moment he starts putting his hand on his sword as a threat is the point where I would full on call him out on not being the hero he presents himself as. I’d just tell him “go ahead. Strike me down and prove I’m right.”
@@animeotaku307My thoughts exactly. It's baffling how many of these Tiny Dong Energy DMs think that a "heroic" character would openly threaten violence against their own party. That's not how ANY of that works...
@@animeotaku307 I wonder what oath golden boy was. An Oath that allows the Chaotic Good action of threatening violence on people who jeer each other?
A lot of Oaths probably wouldn't like attacking people like that
@@followeroftheprince The only one I can think of is Vengeance, but that doesn't really suit the image he's trying to create.
This feels like a creative writing exercise, theres no way any adult would tolerate this situation.
Not only is this person weirdly vindictive and paranoid, but they're also a bad DM. Giving your team useful NPCs is one thing, but your players lose all agency if every problem they encounter is hand-waved by a tag-along NPC.
Also, like, threatening violence at the drop of a hat when someone does something you don't like isn't the heroic flex you think it is, my dude.
Coercion via threat of potential violence is literally one of the least morally good things you could do, especially for something extremely trivial like "which path should we take".
Not just a tag-along NPC, a straight up DMPC
Yeah, if I have NPC's that are skilled and tag along with the party I try to make anything that they do that is helpful give a bonus to the players to actually solve the problem. Tracking a monster? The hunter with you can give you a +2 to your survival skill check if you ask him for help. Keeps the players firmly in the Main Characters slot while making certain NPC's more likable. DMPC's are always done with so little thought, and also those thoughts never include the DM's players in the thoughts.
I'm surprised they didn't all gang up on the DMPC, even if it would've derailed the campaign.
DMPC:"That is no way to be comrades, we have to work together!"
Also DMPC: threatens the party with physical violence anytime they don't blindly follow his directives
I'm most surprised that this didn't turn into physical violence. He's an NPC. Players spend all their time fighting NPCs.
@@corranhorn85 What I was thinking. Some of these people got no balls, and don't stand up for their fellow players against garbage DMs..
what i find interesting about this tale is that the DMPC reveals some true narcissistic qualities of the DM's personality. The supposed stolen paladin behaving more selfishly despite his renowned status acts as an interesting mirror to the DM that behaves selfishly while playing a heroic character.
It’s poetic in a weird, cringey way.
Misread “DM” as “DK”
I cannot describe the scene that played out in my mind with a straight face
Imagining Donkey Kong throwing a temper tantrum over a TTRPG character is hysterical!
@@WorldWalker128Movie DK absolutely would
"Diddle Kid is here!"
Hey wait a sec i recognize you i watch your limbus videos
you do cool stuff man keep it up
@@WorldWalker128
Certified "chimp out"
The funny thing is that if OP and DM had actually collaborated and consented to it, a plot line surrounding two nearly identical golden knights but one is a narcissistic tool the people have disdain for while the other is truly a beloved hero of the people has alot of potential for a good storyline.
Personally going that route I'd probably have the tool one as the famous one because he spent so much time on marketing while the actually good one didn't care about his reputation and just helped people.
@@shadenox8164 Yes! This could make such a good story
Two people can easily make similar characters just by chance alone.
This DM was guilty of a pointless overreaction. The DM also acted like a spoiled child.
Oh yeah
For one of the games I play in another player and I both independently showed up to session zero with a half-elf/half-elf passing charisma caster (bard/sorcerer and sorcerer) with the acolyte background, parental issues, forced to hide or repress their magic for personal safety, a comfortable but heavily regimented upbringing and a knack for finding trouble due to the campaign being their first taste of freedom.
And you know? They still felt like completely different people, because one was naive and inexperienced while the other was rebellious and wild.
For context we're both LGBTQ and live in the American South so of course we're gonna make these types of characters lmao
Basically they were foils, not copies. Sucks the other person had to leave due to work obligations...
@@ablunt-headedtreesnake6094 Same archetype, different people. Who would have imagined? XD
And you're both LGBTQ too, that's honestly kind of funny.
I'm LGBTQ as well, the T in LGBTQ.
"There are only seven stories, and they've all been told already."
Someone's already come up with the same idea you have, no matter how original you think your idea is - so long you can put your own spin on it and make it unique to you, that's what matters.
@@SirFailsalot91 Yeah.
Player tries to steal wagon wheel from innocent travelers. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player*
Player angrily haggles with shopkeeper who's clearly overpricing. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player*
Player gives half of their loaf of bread to a hungry child. *Golden Paladin readies his sword against Player*
I'm joking around, but seriously. The railroading was off the hook and the Paladin was threatening them so much, it's a wonder why they're not an Oathbreaker or Evil.
Sounds like a lawful neutral to me
@@cosmicspacething3474even if that character is somehow accurately LN and backs every "I'm the law" with credible violence threats, I just don't get how the fuck the party didn't just dump him or fought him. So much boring overbearing nonsense and not a single "lol bring it" against an *NPC*, it's not even pvp
It's a wonder they didn't say f it, we attack the paladin
@@hugofontes5708heck even if it was pvp, the paladin started it by threatening to attack first
That's because an OC from a DM like this is obviously strong enough to solo a whole party. The players wouldn't stand a chance.
"You stole my cookie-cutter character concept!"
The Golden Hero is a trope in fairy tales and fiction, the DM Golden Knight isn’t the only or first Golden Knight out there, they have different backstories with OP wanting to do something different and make the Golden Hero a selfish narcissist who learns care for other and what his title really means. All to say DM characters not that Original of an idea, and ruining a campaign over petty jealousy isn’t cool.
If he'd wanted to, he could have even made the golden rivalry a fun story arc, or an actually valuable lesson, or growth motivation.
Instead, he just set out to out-narcissist the narcissist.
Yep. There was OP's mistake. He made up an excuse instead of telling DM to his face "this sucks, you're a prick, your OC is stupid, I'm out" or going full Old Man Henderson. Never give the bullies the opportunity to win that easy. I hope the other players left DM to his DMPC all by himself.
I just usually play as Hodic the Sedgenog.
He’s a marine coloured anthropomorphic porcupine who can go super fast and loves Chilly Dogs.
Original Character. Do NOT steal.
My favorite to play is Marius he’s a fighter who wears a red helmet and attacks his enemies by jumping on them. He’s usually high on mushrooms
In the game I am currently in there is an NPC of a former player's character that is a blue colored tabaxi named Sanic, or at least that is what he calls himself. He is clinically insane, his official home address is a mental institution, and believes he is a hedgehog.
Turned out the character was accidenatlly a perfect recreation of his DM. A golden knight who is secretly a narcissist who veils his terrible personality with passive aggressive "heroic" talk. Guess DM looked into the mirror and didn't like what he saw...
Sadly, while it was stated by op that the character resembling the DM's oc was pure coincidence. They may have inadvertently created a perfect recreation. Narcissistic, arrogant, and rude? Yep, sounds like this DM's unoriginal self insert to me.
I genuinely don't know why OP didn't talk to the other players earlier. They could have ditched the DMPC way earlier and continue without him. Or if the DM always return him, take him on his challenge and don't let him bully them into moral submission, especially if all the group was morally grey. And finally, fight him if necessary. Might have ended the campaign, but at least the players would have stayed together.
Yeah seriously. The first time this "Golden Paladin" gripped his sword in an intimidation tactic, I would have rolled an attack against him on principle. No self-respecting adventurer will just let some dude tagging along coerce them through threat of violence to do what they want.
I don't want to victim blame but..yeah OP had all the chances to call out this BS but he didn't. It does not matter how good the roleplay is. If you do not like something - SAY IT.
@@alaeacusmcfly4353 Chances are high he would've made it be a dc of 30 or something
Im surprised why they didnt leave him in the middle of the night or simply gang up on him when he “puts his hand on his sword”
“Do things my way or I will hurt you.” Yeah that’s totally a way to build teamwork. Sounds like he could use some golden earplugs to go with his golden armor.
Well that's 20 minutes of my life I'm not getting back. Instead of standing up for themselves they just let the dm bully them into leaving. Was anyone at the table even their friend? No one stood for them?
Exactly, I came away from this story pissed, I don't even blame OP at all but wow nobody stood up to the DM's terrible behavior and told him to get a life and stop being so petty?!
I agree 100%. Why did these important conversations happen behind closed doors? If it is clear to both you and other players that you are being railroaded, bring it up to the table. A very frustrating end to this story.
I blame OP for not standing up and calling DM out in front of the other players. I blame the players for letting this BS go on. Everybody sucks here but DM is just the worst
I do think they did act a bit spineless. The DM acted like a little child despite being an adult. And the other adults just let the DM walk all over them
So many of these reddit stories could just be solved by the OP just growing a backbone.
A lawful stupid paladin? How original, how revolutionary!
Never heard about those characters...
In the last 3 minutes
"I made an original character!"
"Original eh? Tell me about them."
"Well they're-"
"It's been done."
"... But I haven't told you anything about them yet."
"IT'S BEEN DONE."
This is why I don't concern myself too much with originality.
The funny thing is, this isn't even really a case of "everything has been done," the GM's TOTALLY ORIGINAL character was just exactly the stereotypical paladin.
This is why you voice openly how you're being mistreated from an obvious bully. You learn who your actual friends are fast that way.
I remember, a few years ago.
I was in VC with friends, doing a raid in GW2. Then, I get called a "whore" by the best friend of one of my friends (I don't remember WHY she called me that, but I sure as hell remember not being rude and not deserving this. Maybe I said something she didn't like, idk).
What did my friend do? She called her best friend out, because that's what friends do! She even pressured her best friend to apologise (I got a fauxpology lol).
I left a group because whenever i needed help nobody even moved a finger, when i was always there for them whenever i could
Better to be alone than around false friends
if I was OP after the first fight where the enemies were focusing only on me and constantly hitting despite my high AC I would've asked the DM right there at the table: "do you have some sort of grudge against me? because it seems like you're fudging quite a few rolls just to screw me over, not to mention the unnecessary checks for trivial things that have humiliating results when I fail them" and then demanded that any future combat rolls he makes are done out in the open for the party to see, just to make sure he's calling them right
Yeah, I don't get why people allow themselves to be targeted, especially when they're aware that it's happening.
@@thegreendragoninn8730 furthermore he should've told the other players what the DM told him and had them conspire to kick the DMPC out of the party and force the DM to stop bullying OP
It's pretty easy. I say this aa someone that used to let a lot of shite slide because I didn't have the social skills to know how to handle them in even semi appropriate ways where I also wouldn't jus get immediately shit down and ignored. (technically I still struggle with that, I just adopted an attitude that if people don't want to listen I'll sink the entire ship to spite one person. LoL) I still often struggle because I'm the type people tend immediately assume they can walk all over then they get all upsetti spaghetti mello dramatic when that doesn't work. Sometimes if I can just don't feel the person is worth any of my emotional investment (and I can be rather emotionally lazy, it's why I don't hate people. Too much like work that is,) I'll let it slide for a while before just quietly packing my stuff and leaving everyone on read. Not the most mature way, but that's usually when I'm just too apathetic about the situation, and he person(s) hassling me to bother caring. By that point ive long since checked out. Especially if I tried to actually communicate beforehand. But I can do that because while I easily form attachments to people, they're easily severed with no real harm to me done. @@thegreendragoninn8730
Scared wimps. Seriously. It's every damn story I hear
@@thegreendragoninn8730 The ever common trap people can walk into of being unwilling to rock the boat due to the difficulty of getting into a game causing them to 'stick it out' through any bullshit in the vain hope of it passing. The old 'No D&D is better than bad D&D' mantra is something every player needs to know.
Having a character who gets disrespected by everyone can be fun, if that is what the player was going for.
I had a wizard (actually arcane domain cleric, but she introduced herself as a wizard) who would constantly brag about her amazing magical abilities, and that she would use them to conquer the Swordcoast, but who nobody takes her seriously, because she looks like a completely normal peasant woman. I even dumpstatted Charisma so I failed more checks.
But that was what the character was supposed to be. People prostrating themselves in front of the future wizard queen would have been equally as unfun as disrespecting the paladin.
"The People's Champion." Uh, you mean, The Rock? Muhammad Ali? How "original" DM.
When the DM showed OP the pic of DM's DMPC my thought was "We have a 40K Fanboy in the house."
On your 1st point against the player, since we don't know what level the party is, since it's something like 12ish sessions in when he comes back with the newly rolled up character, he may actually supposed to be at a level of said magnitude.
Yeah I felt the same, like he glossed over that fact to try and appeal to both sides in the story. I don't know, but it seemed like a bit of an oversight.
Especially if they fought against a beholder before, even if they lost.
They were fighting a beholder when OP lost his first character, so i dont think it was a low level party, maybe level 9 or 10 ish?
And I think the player said that the character has the fame because of the seemingly selfless deed he's done and because the church/temple prop him up as their representative, and has political angle on that. So it make sense if people see him as a celebrity based on that reputation and rumor, even if the character isn't an all powerful being and just good at what he's doing.
I think crab just genuinely had a brain fart and didn’t really think about that.
I do think the character concept is maybe a LITTLE too grandiose and dickish and maybe not a party member I would totally love to have, but it doesn’t sound too outlandishly accomplished for a party that seems to be at a high enough level that they’re well known as “heroes” saving the world from demon portals or whatever.
5:57 I mean, if the last fight was a Beholder and a month has passed with more sessions to be had, I definitely think this isn’t level one. Maybe level 6, most likely levels 8 or 9, so increase the level by one it is a character most likely from level 7 to 10.
Yeah my thoughts when I heard Beholder
I can't believe DreamWorks stole this dms oc when they made Metro Man
There were only two possibilities for this DM:
1) He was fudging his rolls to punish the 'plagardin'
2) The even WORSE posibility that he designed all his encounters/monsters to be anti-paladin(This lizard warrior is weilding a +4 Spear of Paladin Smiting, why to you ask?)
"Elected by the church to be their face. Backs up his talk with skills. The people love him. Selfless hero. He's a fuckin' douche though"
That's not an OC, that's Homelander. Seriously. Change "church" to "megacorp" and "paladin" to superhero.
Immediately thought that!
Thank you! I am glad I wasn't the only one thinking that. Neither the DM nor the OP did anything but reskin Homelander.
You could do this to literally any character? I can promise you if this is enough for you to not consider it an "OC" then you have never created anything original in your life, even outside of characters.
@@ledrid6956agreed. All the people just saying “lmao it’s just homelander” are missing the point. The story isn’t REALLY about the character itself and how original/unoriginal he is; it’s about the DM mistakenly believing that OP stole his character when the parallels between them are just generic, surface level coincidences, and then bullying OP for it.
Nothing is really “original” anymore. Something is always based off of something else. If something being inspired by another thing or sharing similarities to something else is enough to make these people roll their eyes, idk how they enjoy anything. It’s like looking at a game like Hat in Time, seeing the character wears a hat, jumps on platforms, and collects shiny things, and completely discounting it as being “just Mario”
Homelander is not an original character type
DM: My OC is such a kind and virtuous knight of the light!!!!!!
Also DM: [has his OC *literally threaten the party with his sword whenever they don't do what he wants*]
Its kind of wild to me how bad in all TTRPG stories people are at confrontation. "Ok so everyone agrees with me the DM is being a jackass, right?" "Right!" "And he's making it so none of us have fun, right?" "Right!" "So we're gonna confront him, right?!" *general incoherent mumbling and shuffling of character sheets*
There HAS to be an update to this. Like, how did their friends react when they were told to just not come back? How would you justify that as a friend?
Unfortunately this was submitted anonymously through email directly to critcrab, so we prob won't find much
YOU STOLE FIZZY LIFTING POTION
I love it when the waves come up and fill up the whole screen. Happens rarely like a dvd logo hitting the corner. But when it does it’s beautiful.
Why is it ALWAYS a paladin that ends up being the overpowered self-insert DMPC?
Because the image of the holy warrior of justice appeals to that personality type?
Only 3 minutes in, but it's just Homelander the Paladin
DM sounds like a 5 year old trapped in a man's body. I honestly blame all the players for putting up with him for such an incredible length of time.
It bafles me any of the other players could deal with that looser of a DM. Seriously no one speask out for a friend? The entire groups sucks, they are all awfull.
This channel seems so simple, a crab reading dnd horror stories, but i love it so much lmao. Its calming, interesting, great background noise, amazing not background noise, continuously resparks my passion for dnd, and probably more things i cant think of right now. Good job Mr Crabs 🦀
Being replaced... by a DMPC...and then kicked out because your spot is already taken/stolen by the DMPC... Wow. Dick move.
Probably better to leave because that DM sounds incredibly petty and annoying to deal with. Shame about the rest of the group but fuck that DM...
Fuck those players too if they keep playing with that DM and dont have your back.
Jeez, all that the DM needed to do to prevent his OC from being "stolen" was just to tell the player "your character is a bit too similar to an NPC I'm going to bring in later", and the player could have re-written the character to be themed around silver or bronze instead of gold or something.
DMs.. stop making DM PCs! Make DM NPCs! You don’t speak! You are mute! You make no decisions for the party!
I run a game set on the ocean. My players have a bunch of NPCs aboard their ship who can fight alongside them if needed, as well as provide a number of other day to day services. They were, however, selected by the players and ultimately answer to the player characters. They're basically glorified henchmen who have the occasional quest hook if it's a slow session.
Never in my wildest dreams could I imagine them taking over for the party.
@@jaffarebellion292 damn right! Well done, that’s a good system. My players tried to make one of my campaigns into one piece once haha, large ships always remind me of that.
I mean they should speak, but never for the party.
@@shadenox8164 precisely! Yet a mute Wizard is a fun quirk at times
How it should have gone.
DM: "The OC puts his hand on his sword..."
Barbarian: "Bring it fucknuts!"
“The holy warrior strikes down the entire group with one swing, righteously of course.”
"Hey, that's from my script..."
Lol nice
Your "script" is just Star Wars!
I think the big moment for him should, in fact, be "So, let me get this straight. You made an NPC to do my job for me? Okay....bye. Hey players? I' gonna be running a few modules..."
Man the dm really looked at the phrase «never change a winning team» and decided that he would do the opposite. Like the party seemed to be functioning quite well before the DMPC decided to muck it up.
I'm surprised the rest of the party didn't talk to the DM as well, they clearly saw what was happening and chose not to address it. That's shitty behavior as well.
For being some heroic paragon, the DMPC sure doesn't hesitate to threaten them with violence with passive aggressive bullying into the mix
Did anyone else hear him describe the character and think, "sounds like a character I wouldn't wanna play with?"
Ah, the *better* golden paladin is definitely more heroic for *threatening people to go along with him* if they don't divert their path. Like did everyone else hear the part of him putting his hand on his hilt while he spoke?
Sometimes i think im a bad Dm and then i watch a crit crab video and realize oh im just new. Bad dms are malicious
Your timing couldn't be better, Crab King. This morning I learned my father-in-law passed away, and am now frantically cleaning my house before a friend comes over to take care of the cats this weekend. Absolutely nothing better than a new Crit Crab video when I'm cleaning. 💜
Edit: WOW this DM is complete shit. He's so lucky to have players that tolerate him.
I’m sorry for you and your family’s loss. I hope you are all doing okay
Why did the DM break the cart wheel if he didn't want the party to solve it?
Ya i do sympathize with you Crab i honestly tell my players at the begining that i dont run evil games. Crime literally doesnt pay in my games for heroes because it encourages crime not heroics. It also is not the adventure i prepared. 19:57
"And then he's level one" He's a replacement for a character in a seemingly already well-leveled party, so no, he would actually have to be pretty strong and accomplished.
I once had a player pull some character art off the internet for what they were wearing when they went to meet a very important npc... And they chose the SAME character as a reference as I had for the npc they were going to meet with, neither of us knowing beforehand.
Not quite the same thing, but I took the opportunity and rolled with it, and the npc said "Is this supposed to be some kind of joke?" and it turned into an ice-breaker for RP. It was pretty funny.
...Anyway that NPC was Satan, and they're married now, but that's beside the point.
So Satan married himself?
@@cosmicspacething3474 Someone who showed up wearing the same outfit, yes.
"One of us is going to have to go change."
A good running joke could be they have such similar taste this happens a lot.
@@shadenox8164 That would have also been a perfect response lol
Most problems that happened at my table was because of me (the baby dm) not putting my foot down enough or not being clear enough. Communication is key. I talked it out with everyone and it went way better than before, and non of them minded my mess ups. They even liked my DM OCs which is my biggest accomplishment :3 (They even asked if they would see them again because they liked them so much hehe)
Oh damn this dm wasn't named Ian was he?
I swear my last dm was as bad as this except it wasn't because I copied a character of his, but after converting my elven ranger into a cleric I reduced my character's back stoiry to answering a call for aid from her son and he proceeded to crap all ove rmy character killing off said npc and when confronted with the fact a mother wouldn't abandon her child he told me to change my character!
I ran the next game and in 15 minutes demonstrated how a true introductory game is run (yes he claimed his game was an introduction which it wasn't as I turned up in at least their second or third session.)
Making me reroll saves employing exhaustion rules that had I been more knowledgeably about 5e back then would have meant my character sitting out the rest of that adventure!
I didn't know so when we confront the villain of that one shot it turned out to be an orc warchief that I narrowly avoided being killed distracting him from the others in the first round by DODGING.
He took over his wife's character who narrowly avoided hitting the party transmuter with a firebolt due to a critical fumble before fumbling again dropping my character.
To put it bluntly unless he went with some really appalling dm fiat that was a Total Party Kill had he run that properly because none of the survivors would have survived as long as my character had.
I decided to quit that online game early and learned later they revived my character despite there being no way they could have won that fight against 3 orcs and orc warchief.
In response to his first game with me my one was set on Exandria establishing its an entirely different world to his and that my character was banished to his world suffering temporary amnesia as a result.
Unfortunately his one shots got so bad he got "bored" and decided his campaign was also set on Exandria which it couldn't after that session I called him and after realising I was wasting my time and rather upset as this had been a friend (who clearly was nothing of the sort) quit the group even shutting down facebook and not returning as I was really pissed off at his behaviour.
All he had to do was ask as I was trying to shift my campaign off of Exandria because I thought my players wasn't interested.
The truth is I suspect they knew of his growing nastiness and used me to distract him from them given he liked to play favourites wasn't hard to udnerstand except they used to be much better roleplayers and now one literally ran away from a roleplaying situation rather than run his character properly.
Sorry this video gave me flashbacks from back then almost three years ago now.
Back to watching the video now.
If OP wanted to be petty he should have just posted pictures of anime characters that wear golden armor like gilgamesh in the group chat
You have two types of DMs. Ones who railroad the feck out of things and get petty and insert DMPCs to be a-holes. And then you have ones like my main DM. "You want to free Tiamat from the cult and save her? GIVE ME A WEEK AND WE'LL DO THIS, LADS!"
You mentioned that the OPs character might be an over accomplished for their level and I don't think that's actually true. Like there's always room for it sure, but contextually speaking the OP mentioned that the fight that caused his original character to die was against a Beholder. Assuming the DM isn't just throwing high level monsters at a low level party, a Beholder is a CR 13 monster, they're still pretty high up there on the list of dangerous enemies. So it makes sense to me that the replacement character, assuming they were the same level as the party, would be someone who had some accomplishments under their belt. It seems to me like the OP didn't really mention the kind of things that the paladin had done personally, just that they were something of a figurehead for the order that they belonged too, like a pretty face to put on posters and stuff to make people want to trust them.
What an unsatisfying ending. Were the other players not his friends? Couldn't he have told the aftermath?
When sheep unfortunately have something over you when they're acting scummy, don't tell them your plans or expect pity or mercy. Do what you need to do even if it's in secret.
Just realized this video is less than an hour old and not 2 years old
Gave me flashbacks to the lawful stupid paladin that went into a battle knowing beforehand it was unfair and rallied the group to kick the DM out over the unfair encounter
A good DM would see this as an opportunity. This wild coincidence is RIFE with story potential.
I literally stole the characters of Madness Combat, Borderlands, and Skyrim. I put them into my game, changed their races and how they act a bit to make them more appropriate for the setting, and they are some of the favorite characters in my campaign.
It's not bad to take from popular media and put them into your own setting. The problems only come from saying they are completely original and not based off a common idea or a piece of media.
Also it’s interesting to put existing characters into other scenarios they wouldn’t normally be in
Which madness person did you yoink?
Easy fix. Force dm to roll in front of everyone and show the modifiers to be fair and prove roles arent being fudged.
This story depressed me greatly. I've been kicked out of a roleplaying group similar to this and the guy was my best friend at the time.
Got to suggest that, if this tale is true, the DM probably had an issue with the player predating the paladin situation. After all his fighter was the only character who got killed in the early sessions
Communication is a two way street. The DM may have not been "mature enough to discuss his feelings" with the player, but the player also didn't bring it up even when it started escalating. He tried to explain himself once and then just gave up and kept playing despite the abuse? Damn, that must have been some legendary tier roleplay because I certainly wouldn't have stuck around.
He should have talked to the party members to see if they were noticing the same trends and then more consistently spoken to the DM about his concerns.
I dunno, if this were an AITAH post I'd vote ESH to varying degrees.
THIS is the comment I was looking for.
Despite everything the player saying the DM did bad being fair and valid.
- DM was upset with my character before I played it but I thought screw him
- I didn't know what was happening but didn't want to bring it up.
The DM sounds very petty and a hard work, but clearly he put together a great campaign for them because they were enjoying it for months, maybe a bit of respect earlier on would have stopped the escalation.
@@MadMalManoh so you think faking rolls and also stomping on a players character for no good reason also completely ruined a game for his players being fair and valid this just sounds like a person having a power trip thinking all that matters is his enjoyment
@velocirex3984 - The first line in my comment was that the player was correct in what they said, the rest of my comment highlighted that they willfully avoided communicating with the DM.
Your comment just spoke on my behalf, well done you literally just did what half the stories condemn childish people for.
@@MadMalMan actually the opposite read your own comment
14:50 that "of course woohoo yeah" was so funny for some reason
The OP shouldn’t feel to bad about getting kicked out, O get the sense the group isn’t going to last much longer with how things were going.
@11:24 is where my soul cracked from cringe. *a REAL champion*
im sorry but id very much explode on the guy and call him out at every aspect, legit removing half of the roleplay because your OC wants them to be good is just horrible DMing. Whats that, dont agree with my OC? Threatens you with his sword so you ahve to do it his way, honestly the last part started to feel like he was heavily railroading, was really hoping the party pushed him into the valcano
What's even worse is it seams like the railroading only happened because the DM didn't like OP. Punishing people for something someone else did is already horrible, but especially when that someone else didn't even do what you say they did, it just becomes even worse.
@HOLDENPOPE agreed yea, legit ive dealt with railroading before and i hate it. (This was a pokemon mystery dungeon dnd) Dm gives us a choice to go to the next dungeon to uncover more of the mystery were solving, or stay in stay for a bit and restock our items. We decided to stay and restock only to have the dungeons boss appear in town wrecking havoc, we didn't get to restock and didn't get to visit that dungeon.
5:35 The context is right there. This is a character made to join the existing party, hence starting at a higher level.
Reminder that even a handful of levels are usually way above the scope of most normal people too, and they mentioned most people outside of that church might not know the character.
It's bad enough that the other players let DM ruin the roleplay, but the fact that OP let all this happen to him without once calling the DM out on his blatant cheating and targeting boggles my mind. Why would anyone allow themselves to be such a doormat?
Is there another side to this? Because If i saw my DM targeting another player you can bet I (and likely the rest of my table) would call them out on it publicly
Dawg aint no way the DM self inserted a DMPC to spite a players PC and put training wheels on the entire team 😂
Imagine thinking a heroic character would use threat of violence to force their will on their party. Totally an upstanding paragon of virtue...
Also, after all those supposed crits, and repeated hits against my character like OP faced, I'd be demanding the DM roll openly to prove he isn't cheating maliciously.
I literally made this exact OC a while ago long before this video dropped, literally what is this DM on about???
A friend made an Original Character do not steal (as we joke about it) that pretty much made him a wolf (or if it was bear) mutant with the exact powers as Wolverine minus the metal skeleton.
Could it be possible that DM introduced his OC as a foil to OP's character? Maybe the DM was expecting them to fight back against his relentless do-gooder-ness. instead of cowering and backing down every time the OC gripped his sword.
If this is what the DM planned, targeting and downing the OP in combat so often was no way to do it... and after hearing the end, it seems like it was actually malicious. But, as players, you have agency. If all of your characters were annoyed by the OC in RP, why not work together to find a way to ditch him/get rid of him? Basically find a way in-game to tell your DM "this isn't the type of game we want". Or straight up talk to your DM and say that the OC is spoiling some of the fun? Like he said, they are all adults.
I'm just saying, the poor communication was going both ways.
It was clearly malicious did you listen to the story
@@doge9455Did you read my comment?
DM: You stole my character.
DM's "character": Mary Sue and mom of the group.
"If the DM can't be mature enough to tell me his problems, then I don't care."
If you realized the dm was having an issue with something, why didn't you bring it up immediately? You wanna sit there and act like the DM was the only one having trouble communicating. This whole situation could've been nipped before your character was fully built. I get that your DM is pretty goofy for getting pissed off over nothing, but if you realized he was upset, why didn't you as a friend speak up?