@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Oh come on, its high time you came up with a new line instead of the same old boring & lame line again and again and again and....... Its as annoying as kids saying "i'm first" here.
@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 I’ve said it like 4 times in 6 months. Get over it. Sounds like I’ve done this to you. Sorry if I hurt your comedic aspirations. 🤣
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 haha....you lecturing me about humor is like me lecturing you about aviation. Been a musical entertainer where humor is almost mandatory for 37 years, and i've kept big crowds engaged ,so just give up your heckling or i keep making comebacks like i do to hecklers, ESPECIALLY self important boring hecklers whom i utterly despise.
I love flying in these thin fog layers. They are just magic! And that visual approach to 22R at Nice was also amazing. With that runway in use you have to make visual turn over the bay. Love it!
@@AnimalisMD Then you’d know of all the airlines, Ryanair skimps on economy but not on pilot training… IF you’ve actually flown them. And who uses the term “butter” anyway???😂
That carpet of fog reminded me of the use of FIDO 🐕👀 in WW2 [FIDO = Fog, Intensive Dispersal Of]. Ground crews lined runways with drums of petrol and set them alight; the heat cleared the immediate area of fog well enough to give pilots a chance of landing in apparently zero visibility. I think they improved the system to use pipes and open channels later on, but it started out with just burning drums of petrol. Permanent bright electric lights weren't a safe fog solution. They were too conspicuous, vulnerable, and would have made the runways easy targets for the German bombers. Burning fuel could be deployed quickly and it turned out to be an amazingly effective way to get the aircrews home safely - especially at night - without giving the enemy's high-flying reconnaissance planes too much information about what was going on down below. Extra lines of burning drums could be moved around and set up a mile away from the real airfield as a decoy; bomber crews attacking British airfields at night could be tricked into dropping their bombs on a completely fake target, especially if they were under pressure from anti-aircraft fire. I suppose FIDO would be banned today for being environmentally unfriendly.🙄
I imagine it was just such a landing that prompted a flight attendant to say over the PA: "Please stay seated until captain kangaroo has hopped us to the gate"
Just wanted to echo the sentiment already expressed by others on the absolutely STUNNING videography talent exhibited in KLM foggy landing capture. Well done Sir or Madam!
Ever since I've flown in a 787 and have seen the engines from a stairway just in front and felt their power I absolutely adore this airplane. I prefer airbus in general but I love the 747 as well, understandably.
The larger windows on the 787 also give a rather unnerving sense of awareness of the exterior than I'm used to. But after a while you get used to it and it's pretty cool.
Love watching the Cours Sayela approaches into Nice (I live there), the daily Emirates A380 is always spectacular when arriving over the "baie des anges"
Ryan Air are surely the official testing partner for Boeing landing gear durability ! You never hear of those components failing due to heavily landings.
The Qatar 787-9 approach: From such a wide field of view allowed by a great vantage point, it would have been stunning to see the aircraft and the runway in the same frame during the entire approach. To zoom in on the plane removes the stunning part and just shows a plane flying. I really wanted to see the entire approach zoomed out. Maybe next time.
@@soaringvultureHe landed beyond the touchdown zone (the white markers running either side of the centre line). At this point you must go around or risk insufficient stopping space.
Landing long on a 4500m long runway is less risky then a go-around and a second approach to the same runway in the same poor conditions. If was certainly an ugly landing and certainly will produce a “please explain” from the Captain.
Thoughts: I loved the KLM landing Yikes!!! re the Air Canada landing at Narita.I recognized the airport 😀and I hope the pilot had a nice chat with the chief pilot.. I want that balcony or rooftop overlooking the Nice airport. I'd never leave that spot.
For some reason, videos on this channel always have subtitles activated, which is pretty pointless, since the text is written in white anyway. For my tablet, I need to click the "CC" synbol in the upper right of the video screen. May be different for your system, maybe hidden behind the options cogwheel somewhere. You have to deactivate subtitles, however this is done for your browser/app/system.
Re 787 landing after a skp: When the runway is very long, and the wind is very strong, and the airplane is not so heavy - the pilot will often choose ro recover from the skip and land safely. A Go Around is only necessary for more marginal landings - and a Go Around by itself is also a critical maneuver.
Awesome video as always mate! (Btw not that it matters, it's just the aviation nerd coming out in me but the RAAF only fly's F/A-18F Super Hornets these days after retiring the fleet of original Hornets many years ago 🙂)
The thrust reverser flaps are open, but the reverse thrust isn't activated. So it's more or less just a bit of extra drag. The ground switch is in the main landing gear, so when they touch down and have enough weight on them and the thrust lever is in idle, only then do they even open. So it was a clear landing without issues. The thrust was only just activated shortly before the nose landing gear came down. And since the engines need a bit of time to spool up again, that's fine.
Wrong. It depends on your airline and type of approach you choose. When I do Nice I do the VOR A but the final segment I fly as a visual. We don't have an RNP approach built for either runway. I think Norwegian and maybe air France do but we don't
@@chrissyb69 what wrong? Read the airport operational information. Aircraft flying to LFMN must be equipped with area navigation system in compliance with RNP APCH as per ICAO 9613. Preferential approach is RNP A 04L followed by VPT A (visual prescribed tracks) or RNP D for 22R followed by VPT (the one in the video). Then of course if you fly there non commercial operations you can do whatever you want.
@@eTini48 yes but RNP capability isn't what I'm getting at here. As a commercial captain of over 13 years I was highlighting that the choice of approaches are down to local law, approach equipment, weather/visibility and crew choice. You can build an RX point by the fmc and utilize the fmc/fms guidance (hence RNP) but you can also handfly the entire thing in vmc. RNP A/B are backed up with VOR A/B and ofcourse the ILS over antibes (if the fog is down on 04L). So, before you get all affronted by my comment - understand that whatever approaches you like to play on msfs, in the real world you're fully allowed to fly it visually and back it up with conventional navigation aids, not just RNP guidance.
@@chrissyb69 I'm not affronted, I'm telling you what local law says, according to lido AOI. If you flying non RNAV capability plane, then you shall report in order to get radar vectoring. Then ofc you can request visual for final approach. But it's not the standard. To sum up, I love how you have to show off and assume I fly flights simulator. Lol. With your experience, it's not good doing assumptions. Looks like the one feel affronted here it's not me. Cheers.
@@eTini48 I wasn't showing off sir, and the assumption you fly flight simulators is not a bad thing. I've used them myself - they got me into flying in the first place. What I was trying to get across, perhaps not delicately enough, was that RNAV capability doesn't dictate the approach type flown. We fly a STAR to the designate approach point OR radar vectors, then we usually use the VOR A to vector to the Mapt and from there we disconnect and handfly the final leg, usually utilizing the ILS as a backup. What my original comment was about was that SOME airlines do indeed have a company built RNP approach in the FMC that the autopilot flies, but our sorry crowd do not have that - they rely on conventional navigation and then pilot created ones approaches OR handflow visual maneuvers. It wasn't meant as a personal thing directed at you
They better check the shimmy damper scissor in the Ryanair. This issue has totaled several 737's already (although as far as I know they were all Classic, not NG or MAX)
If you understand the physics behind that landing of the ryanair airplane, you would understand that this was a better landing than a very smooth landing. Short explanation: Kinda like aquaplanning and cars.
Bouncing is not good for sure but a firm landing is safer than a smooth one when water is present. Cause when you land smooth, the tires need longer to start rotating and the rubber which is “shredded” create heat and then you get something called “heat pillow” and you are actually not in contact with the ground. You are floating on the “heat air” and you do not have grip. Sorry aqua planning is the German word for that. Hydroplaning is the English word. Sorry for that :).
Couldn’t spot one, myself. But we definitely saw one in a video he posted a few weeks ago of a landing at Heathrow, quite close up, not telephoto like this one.
Ryanair actually has a really good safety rating... Better than some of the big brand name airlines. It's just the landings mean you should bubble wrap your clothes when you're packing so they don't get damaged.
The foggy landing has to be about the most beautiful bit of aircraft photography I've seen - superb.
Much appreciated! 🍁🙌🏻
They say the landing was smooth as butter? this was the cream they make the butter with !
nobody in the business says “butter”
It looked crazy smooth too - pilot kept that nose gear in the air longer than it was stowed during the flight it seems.
That foggy landing was fire🔥🔥
Pure Amsterdam autumn vibes 🍂🍁
@@AmsterdamAviationYT yeah 😎
You have never seen a real fog then!!! 🤣
@@andrewmgodden what do you mean? I had seen the fog before, but this one is beautiful🤨
@@andrewmgodden can’t see the plane in that kind of fog mate 😂
Pilot; "What's the top of the cloud deck?" ATC:" 12 feet."
Don’t give up your day job. 😂
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183yeah, you too.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Oh come on, its high time you came up with a new line instead of the same old boring & lame line again and again and again and.......
Its as annoying as kids saying "i'm first" here.
@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 I’ve said it like 4 times in 6 months. Get over it. Sounds like I’ve done this to you. Sorry if I hurt your comedic aspirations. 🤣
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 haha....you lecturing me about humor is like me lecturing you about aviation. Been a musical entertainer where humor is almost mandatory for 37 years, and i've kept big crowds engaged ,so just give up your heckling or i keep making comebacks like i do to hecklers, ESPECIALLY self important boring hecklers whom i utterly despise.
Oh come on, that was a *textbook* Ryanair landing.
The passengers hadn’t paid for the smooth landing upgrade.
😂
The textbook approved by Boink.
That was CGI.
I love flying in these thin fog layers. They are just magic!
And that visual approach to 22R at Nice was also amazing. With that runway in use you have to make visual turn over the bay. Love it!
What do you mean THIN FOG LAYER. This moronic content creator said it was DENSE. The only thing DENSE around here is NOT THE FOG!!! 🙄
I think there is an RNP-AR approach you can fly that does everything for you.
@@EdOeuna Correct! They have an RNP Z for 22R. But still, in these weather conditions it's a great approach.
I come from 2 landings of Ryanair last week (Malaga-Prague and back) and can confirm, actually my back and kidneys can confirm their way to do it
1:11 No no, it's a Classic Ryanair
it was a great ryanair landing I would say
@@emiloss91 Showing Air Canada just how it's done
A classic trampoline landing
🙄
🤣
That hi-G turn looked very impressive! Geeeeeeeee Whizzzzzzzz 🛩️
Much appreciated for the feature mate! 🌫️✈️
This episode had some real gems... The foggy KLM landing and the Qatar landing in Nice topped off by your typical Ryanair "butter" landing.☺☺
Another person who’s never flown Ryanair…😂
You guessed it right. That's indeed Nice Côte d'Azur airport. You are a very good observer.
@@PN_48 wrong
@@AnimalisMD Then you’d know of all the airlines, Ryanair skimps on economy but not on pilot training… IF you’ve actually flown them. And who uses the term “butter” anyway???😂
@@PN_48 It was in quotes because it was a joke/metaphor.
someone make that fog landing a wallpaper!!
We could do that 🤔
Take a screenshot and you have it.
@@robertvalet2079thing is, Amsterdamaviation has the 4K Raw footage, looks much better than only a screenshot
That carpet of fog reminded me of the use of FIDO 🐕👀 in WW2 [FIDO = Fog, Intensive Dispersal Of].
Ground crews lined runways with drums of petrol and set them alight; the heat cleared the immediate area of fog well enough to give pilots a chance of landing in apparently zero visibility. I think they improved the system to use pipes and open channels later on, but it started out with just burning drums of petrol.
Permanent bright electric lights weren't a safe fog solution. They were too conspicuous, vulnerable, and would have made the runways easy targets for the German bombers.
Burning fuel could be deployed quickly and it turned out to be an amazingly effective way to get the aircrews home safely - especially at night - without giving the enemy's high-flying reconnaissance planes too much information about what was going on down below.
Extra lines of burning drums could be moved around and set up a mile away from the real airfield as a decoy; bomber crews attacking British airfields at night could be tricked into dropping their bombs on a completely fake target, especially if they were under pressure from anti-aircraft fire.
I suppose FIDO would be banned today for being environmentally unfriendly.🙄
C(arbon), R(eduction), Are, P(athetic)! CRAP!
I imagine it was just such a landing that prompted a flight attendant to say over the PA: "Please stay seated until captain kangaroo has hopped us to the gate"
LOVED hearing that Rooster at the very beginning! ❤🐓
Just wanted to echo the sentiment already expressed by others on the absolutely STUNNING videography talent exhibited in KLM foggy landing capture. Well done Sir or Madam!
Ever since I've flown in a 787 and have seen the engines from a stairway just in front and felt their power I absolutely adore this airplane. I prefer airbus in general but I love the 747 as well, understandably.
The larger windows on the 787 also give a rather unnerving sense of awareness of the exterior than I'm used to. But after a while you get used to it and it's pretty cool.
Love watching the Cours Sayela approaches into Nice (I live there), the daily Emirates A380 is always spectacular when arriving over the "baie des anges"
The first clip is so beautiful!
That KLM landing was smoother than some others where the pilot could see the runway.
yeah Cat III autolandings are absolute butter.
Foggy. A little reminder of AIRPLANE's opening scene.
Ryan Air are surely the official testing partner for Boeing landing gear durability ! You never hear of those components failing due to heavily landings.
What’s a ^”heavily landing”, we wonders?
It's what Conan the barbarian said. You can trust steel. Especially vacuum-melted chome-moly steel.
Came to post this... leaving satisfied
"We conduct destructive testing on commercial flights!"
My favorite youtube channel by far - great work!
The foggy landing was dope AF 🔥 🔥
Glad you liked it 🙌🏻
The Qatar 787-9 approach: From such a wide field of view allowed by a great vantage point, it would have been stunning to see the aircraft and the runway in the same frame during the entire approach. To zoom in on the plane removes the stunning part and just shows a plane flying. I really wanted to see the entire approach zoomed out. Maybe next time.
Just came back from Planespotting. Perfect timing
Today, octuber 23, is the National Day of Aviation in Mexico 🇲🇽. Congratulations to all airmens!!!
Those 737 on a Ryanair pilot's hands proven to be a decent aircraft... the punisher landing!
Average Ryanair landing tbh
🙄
That spot in Nice (Colline du Château) is such a cool spot
Bet the Air Canada 787 guy got a call from the Chief Pilot that was not a very comfortable conversation for him.
He was going to land that airplane, be damned! I’m sure that is going to get him a conversation about critical decision making.
Why? At least he was on the runway, not a taxiway.
@@soaringvultureHe landed beyond the touchdown zone (the white markers running either side of the centre line). At this point you must go around or risk insufficient stopping space.
@@Djnffnoeosmfasjjd I understand that. I was comparing it to the July 7, 2017 incident at SFO.
Landing long on a 4500m long runway is less risky then a go-around and a second approach to the same runway in the same poor conditions. If was certainly an ugly landing and certainly will produce a “please explain” from the Captain.
Thoughts: I loved the KLM landing
Yikes!!! re the Air Canada landing at Narita.I recognized the airport 😀and I hope the pilot had a nice chat with the chief pilot..
I want that balcony or rooftop overlooking the Nice airport. I'd never leave that spot.
I've actually flown on PH-AOA (YVR to AMS) hopefully they've fixed the inflight entertainment problem! Beautiful landing none the less.
Why is You-Tube suddenly putting huge pop-ups for the next video in the middle of the screen?
I never even saw that F/A-18.
For some reason, videos on this channel always have subtitles activated, which is pretty pointless, since the text is written in white anyway. For my tablet, I need to click the "CC" synbol in the upper right of the video screen. May be different for your system, maybe hidden behind the options cogwheel somewhere. You have to deactivate subtitles, however this is done for your browser/app/system.
Yeah they are no longer at the end of the video, but near the end; like 75%. It's very annoying.
KLM Pilot: "Light as a feather, just caress the runway with our landing gear."
Ryan Air: "I came in like a wreeeeecking ball!"
Re 787 landing after a skp: When the runway is very long, and the wind is very strong, and the airplane is not so heavy - the pilot will often choose ro recover from the skip and land safely. A Go Around is only necessary for more marginal landings - and a Go Around by itself is also a critical maneuver.
0:30 and a nice wheelie
aint a wheelie
It’s called flaring
The KLM landing was kick-ass;
The Ryanair landing kicked asses (and backs of passengers) 😂😂
The KLM's landing was a kiss.
The Ryanair's was a kick.
Rooster (audio) at the beginning of the foggy landing was a nice touch.
I love how the cockerel added to the effect of the early morning landing
Awesome video as always mate! (Btw not that it matters, it's just the aviation nerd coming out in me but the RAAF only fly's F/A-18F Super Hornets these days after retiring the fleet of original Hornets many years ago 🙂)
Qatar landing in Nice. Been there stunning approach during daytime, scary during night time.
That KLM landing was ridiculously beautiful. And Ryanair is still...well... Ryanair.
That Nice landing.. beautiful!!
Excellent Video 👍👍👍
Ryanair testing landing gear before landing on aircraft carrier... normal day
Great video!
It’s cameraman who lost the visibility, not the pilot.
Loving the Cockerell at the start. .
My flight from amsterdam was delayed 2 hours due to a fog
That was a smooth landing for Ryanair. No tires were blown out.
We got Halloween Landings now 😂
That is a professional.
Thanks for another amazing video(but get ready for daily mail to blame boeing for the air canada)
Well, it's Boeing's fault that they sold them the plane.
i went plane spotting at denver and got some mazing shots even a special southwest livery touchdown
Good onya. Send em in.
@inncogneato6341 ?
Thats why they practice and learn by heart to not only trust your instruments,but land by using instruments !!
The KLM butter fog landing - question ... Can I see window blinds down? I always assumed they had to be up for landing? I'm likely mistaken
Every AMS landing is a unique site as it never dull
At 0:44 What is a long float?
Twice round the lazy river
No one:
Smoothest Ryan Air landing: 1:11
Good. Thanks.
Très joli visuel 👍
Most gentle Ryanair landing
Cool!
Fiftee, fortee, tirtee, twentee (crunch,) haha heehee, jus messin wid ya!
Nice Thx
What was the category of landing for the first clip?
Successful
Probably max CAT I ILS landing, only some groundfog which cleared up really soon when the sun came out
The fog is so thin that it probably wouldn’t even be noticed by the pilots and only noticeable from the slant angle from the camera.
@@KeithHearnPlus 😂
Nice clips, but that was not a "dense layer of fog". It was a "thin layer of shallow fog". From the cockpit the runway lights would have been visible.
For the first one, isn't it unwise to activate the thrust reversers before all wheels have touched down? Or is that a common practice?
The thrust reverser flaps are open, but the reverse thrust isn't activated. So it's more or less just a bit of extra drag.
The ground switch is in the main landing gear, so when they touch down and have enough weight on them and the thrust lever is in idle, only then do they even open. So it was a clear landing without issues. The thrust was only just activated shortly before the nose landing gear came down. And since the engines need a bit of time to spool up again, that's fine.
1:36 Nice is not a visual approach, it's RNP with prescribed tracks
Wrong. It depends on your airline and type of approach you choose. When I do Nice I do the VOR A but the final segment I fly as a visual. We don't have an RNP approach built for either runway. I think Norwegian and maybe air France do but we don't
@@chrissyb69 what wrong? Read the airport operational information. Aircraft flying to LFMN must be equipped with area navigation system in compliance with RNP APCH as per ICAO 9613. Preferential approach is RNP A 04L followed by VPT A (visual prescribed tracks) or RNP D for 22R followed by VPT (the one in the video). Then of course if you fly there non commercial operations you can do whatever you want.
@@eTini48 yes but RNP capability isn't what I'm getting at here. As a commercial captain of over 13 years I was highlighting that the choice of approaches are down to local law, approach equipment, weather/visibility and crew choice. You can build an RX point by the fmc and utilize the fmc/fms guidance (hence RNP) but you can also handfly the entire thing in vmc. RNP A/B are backed up with VOR A/B and ofcourse the ILS over antibes (if the fog is down on 04L). So, before you get all affronted by my comment - understand that whatever approaches you like to play on msfs, in the real world you're fully allowed to fly it visually and back it up with conventional navigation aids, not just RNP guidance.
@@chrissyb69 I'm not affronted, I'm telling you what local law says, according to lido AOI. If you flying non RNAV capability plane, then you shall report in order to get radar vectoring. Then ofc you can request visual for final approach. But it's not the standard.
To sum up, I love how you have to show off and assume I fly flights simulator. Lol. With your experience, it's not good doing assumptions. Looks like the one feel affronted here it's not me. Cheers.
@@eTini48 I wasn't showing off sir, and the assumption you fly flight simulators is not a bad thing. I've used them myself - they got me into flying in the first place. What I was trying to get across, perhaps not delicately enough, was that RNAV capability doesn't dictate the approach type flown. We fly a STAR to the designate approach point OR radar vectors, then we usually use the VOR A to vector to the Mapt and from there we disconnect and handfly the final leg, usually utilizing the ILS as a backup. What my original comment was about was that SOME airlines do indeed have a company built RNP approach in the FMC that the autopilot flies, but our sorry crowd do not have that - they rely on conventional navigation and then pilot created ones approaches OR handflow visual maneuvers. It wasn't meant as a personal thing directed at you
1:18
The pilots:
Do you know how to flare?
No.
Me neither.
Good, lets land anyway.
Only looks like "dense fog" when viewed horizontally from a half mile away. It's likely that the runway was fully visible from above the whole time.
They better check the shimmy damper scissor in the Ryanair. This issue has totaled several 737's already (although as far as I know they were all Classic, not NG or MAX)
02:20 I suspect that that was a short initial and pitch.
If you understand the physics behind that landing of the ryanair airplane, you would understand that this was a better landing than a very smooth landing. Short explanation: Kinda like aquaplanning and cars.
That's what I'm sayin!
@Reselox Wtf is ^”aquaplanning”, we all wonders?🤷♂️🤦♂️🙄
keeping the car analogy; so you want to go full speed over a speedbump not once but twice?
Bouncing is not good for sure but a firm landing is safer than a smooth one when water is present. Cause when you land smooth, the tires need longer to start rotating and the rubber which is “shredded” create heat and then you get something called “heat pillow” and you are actually not in contact with the ground. You are floating on the “heat air” and you do not have grip. Sorry aqua planning is the German word for that. Hydroplaning is the English word. Sorry for that :).
As someone who does understand the physics behind that landing, a smooth landing is better than a bounce.
You call that a dense layer of fog? That's not even the starter kit for the San Joaquin valley.
The last one is exactly how I feel doing a steep turn in a 150
0:44 What? WHAT?
It's probably his first day or something!!
Anyone know which airport the Qatar plane (2nd from last) was landing at?
It was beautiful!
It's Nice. It was nice, too, but the airport was Nice.
@@soaringvulture Thank you! 😊 I was really asking with a view to trying that airport in Flight Simulator 2024, due to be released shortly.
2:35 Damn, how late you can hear it. You would be dead before even knowing it was there
It's like wanting a motorcycle but having just watched dash cams Australia. Who wants to fly after that!!!????
1:20 Glad gear/tire did not fail or all 737MAX would possibly get grounded again.
Ryanair billed the passengers for the extra landing...
Oh yeah!
Beauty
I wonder if the reversers helped clear the fog at all
why is there a Concorde in the background of the Qatar Airways dreamliner landing at Nice?
Couldn’t spot one, myself. But we definitely saw one in a video he posted a few weeks ago of a landing at Heathrow, quite close up, not telephoto like this one.
'Nice' Qatar landing!!!
I see what you did there. 😆
@@barbarajeffries😉
Every Ryanair landing is a headline because it establishes that landing gear is the only reliable component of Boeing 737 family.
Isn’t it true that the plane takes off and lands via computer? The pilots are backups incase the computer goes down?
No
take off is always manual, landing can be automatic, mainly when visibility is low
Clip 1 - Hardly a "dense layer of fog" as it doesn't even come up above the wings.
Inversion layer at ground level was no big deal.
how many on board when ryanair did that test?
That Ryanair pilot obviously went to the naval aviators school of how (not) to flare. ;-)
Note to self.
Never fly RyanAir into Tokyo Narita. 😱
Never fly to Narita.
Never fly Ryanair.
They only fly medium haul so you should be okay on #1
Sounds like you’ve never flown Ryanair full stop…😂
Ryanair actually has a really good safety rating... Better than some of the big brand name airlines.
It's just the landings mean you should bubble wrap your clothes when you're packing so they don't get damaged.
ah...the standard Ryanair landing captured on camera!! LOL
I see higher than average amount of KLM planes doing wheelies. It’s a thing among pilots right?
It might be a thing amongst pilots but it’s not a thing amongst aircraft manufacturers.
What a beautiful A330-203 tho !
Testing the durability of a 737 max takes balls, they fall apart without that kind of treatment.
Is Tokyo Narita always windy?!
Seems that way.
I thought that the Qatar Airways pilot clearly overshot the localizer of the runway. Crazy optical illusion
KLM pilots close their eyes and whince right before landing regardless so this was pretty routine