Quit gaslighting nutmeg! Funny how nutmeg lies, gets called out on the lie, then tries to say people were complaining about the offspring instead of the LIE.
I have grandchildren, and not one at four years old ever expressed interest in an expensive camera or stated a specific name brand. Four year olds live for the moment----and try getting one to stay still for a picture, let alone entrusting a child that age with an expensive camera. Someone, as usual, is giving the world another line of BS.
Because she know that the late queen had one so she is lying about her son want a expense camera and what child at that age would ask for that brand of camera and want to take pictures
If she wants her children to have titles, then they need to be presented to their grandfather the King to be acknowledged as their position in line of succession. Follow the rules or get out.
If those children were not born "of her body" they won't be Prince & Princess full stop. Rules are Rules; espc re an Organisation/Institution which has existed for more than twelve hundred years 🙏🏻🇬🇧
My 4 yr old granddaughter asked for a camera. It wasn’t an expensive camera used by adults. They make them for children specifically. I’ll never understand why Meghan Markle feels she needs to keep lying. I also am wondering when Harry will find his backbone/balls.
My 4 year old, when asked if he wanted a brother or sister when I was pregnant said he wanted a puppy lol. I doubt very much that Meghan has any idea of what Archie would really like for Christmas, more like she's hoping some fan of hers will supply one for herself !
Tut Tut. You are forgetting this is the child who was had a command of three syllable words by the time he was one. To be fair to the invisible child, with his inherited gene pool, it is only to be expected that his intelligence exceeds his parents.
One of the reasons I don't believe Carparkle has kids is because she has no idea how kids actually think or what they would or wouldn't say. Everyone of us who has had children knows this 🤷
The Sussex children have no vaccination/immunization records. They can't attend a public or private school without all required immunizations. Unvaccinated children present a danger to public health. There have been multiple outbreaks of resistant strains of Measles, Chicken Pox, Mumps reported throughout the country.
You people that insist these kids aren’t real are just as demented as I’m sure Harry son has a birth certificate and probably attend school at home as most homeschooled children do.
I agree Victoria - the fake belly dropping spoke wonders. If she had kids, we'd never have heard the end of it especially to compete with Catherine - that's where all this jealousy and deceit begun IMHO
I get what you’re saying, but if she had the child of a surrogate, then I wish she would just say so. People would understand because so many women struggle with fertility. If she had been honest, she could’ve made that a platform and really worked toward women’s fertility issues. It’s unfortunate that she had to do the fake belly and then lie. It isn’t sustainable.
It's nothing to do with the kids. It's the parenting styles that are the issue. Catherine and William would never use their children to gain advantage. That's the difference. The Harkles would and do use their " invisibles" to grift. 💩💩💩💩💩💩
@@Crusader804 I agree with you. How to mess your children up mentally and emotionally in one easy lesson! Catherine always is a hands on Mother and makes sure her children have as varied and as normal a life in the outside world as within the confines of their Royal life! They are going to grow up to be well adjusted and capable children. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
EXACTLY. She’s blameshifting, and she’s CAUSING it to happen so she CAN blameshift, gaslight, revise history, and create a new narrative to work off of in the future.
First, she doesn't know the age of "her" child. Then she makes statements that are beyond ridiculous claiming it's something he said. Everyone knows by now that if her lips are moving, she's lying. She is pathological. Seriously, this person needs to be admitted to a psych ward. IMO
EXACTLY! She CAUSED a situation so she could turn around and blameshift (blaming the public rather than her behavior) gaslight (make people think what they seen was something else), & revise history (trying to put on record that she mentioned Archie and people had a fit over it). MASSIVE narcissist!
Arthur Daley's wife was never seen either. Same with Captain Mainwaring's wife in the BBC's "Dad's Army". I suspect Archie has a birth defect, maybe two heads or three legs.
@@raypurchase801Arthur Daley's wife and Capt Mainwaring's wife are both fictitious characters created for TV. So are you agreeing that Archie is also just a fictional character? To many people, including me, that would seem to be the case!
Megain was just grifting for a freebie camera. She got caught out on a lie and her unbelievable response? to spin some BS about A's privacy. she is as mad as a box of frogs.
That's the dead giveaway isn't it? We would have heard every symptom she ever had, etc. , how she nearly lost her life giving birth...You would have thought she was the only woman who'd ever had a baby. That's what I've always said about her hands clutching her fake bump so strangely, she was ACTING like she was pregnant in a play or movie.
If you listen to her story about Archie and the camera lie and look at her face expressions you can tell she's lying as usual. First she said whenever we have Archie why would a parent make such a comment. That sounds like it slipped out that they only have him on occasion as needed for photo props. Then the comments about him wanting that particular camera that Catherine has and the queen had is why she wants one for herself for free and used the Archie name. And she would exploit these kids if they were really hers to the media to sell the shots for millions of dollars. But she's been calculating and scheming again and only lets out these same shots in the press to keep the lie going to keep Charles hanging to try to use them as bait She was looking down when she was talking shifting her eyes and mouth again her mom did the same thing at the wedding when she knew what they were planning and scamming. Then she looked up to see if they were believing her lies and then kept going with the story
What was all her coat- flicking and pregnancy bump flaunting about I never saw so much over- done pregnancy belly display, with outfits chosen specifically to display her belly in a pretty undignified way. It was remarkably tawdry from my view. On top of that, it is obvious she was NOT herself physically pregnant. The belly shape was completely wrong and the size fluctuated in the wrong direction many times. She also had no bump at all at times during second and third trimester. It was caught slipping below her knees one day
I know! I firmly believe Valentine Low witnessed the moon bump slip & shaded MM in a very sly way, that went over the heads of many people who read his article. He had reported on an engagement MM had attended, while pregnant with Archie, that I believe is the engagement where her moon bump very visibly, slid past her knees.& are likely the pics you are referring to. She was lucky to be wearing a dress that was long enough to keep the the moon bump from being totally exposed. Valentine Low, IMO was deliberate with his choice of words & phrasing. He wrote (I'm paraphrasing) that it appears that Markle may have let her "due date" SLIP, while on this engagement....
There are many famous women at the momeny flashing there pregnant tummies at the moment. Serena Miller is one of them far more revealing than Meghan ever was.
Agree. I have never, in my life, seen any pregnant woman cup her belly top and bottom, pushing her clothing close to her shape almost non stop. Never. We have 55 nieces and nephews, and a couple hundred relatives that stream from my Grandparents on both sides, as well as my husbands family. Plus many friends, children of my own and now grandchildren. MY point is, in all my life, not one, not one pregnant woman has managed to do all that exploitive, I am pregnant nonsense the same as Megan. Not one. Maybe cup the hand on top, or when baby is kicking or to settle into a car and get seat belt on, but her hand actions were absolutely ridiculous. She looked like a simpleton.
They just are waiting for a big money offer to show off the kids. They don't need security, because nobody cares about any of them. It's because they think so highly of themselves.
Its purely a marketing ploy, do they or don't they have kids ? It's to get the despicable duo in the media. I couldn't give a toss about the kids, if they exist, who knows
Why do they need security for children that do not live with them??? They do not have any children. The two children born to surrogates still live with their birth mothers -- the surrogates. Period. She had a hysterectomy at 29 YO and he "shoots blanks" per his own words!!!!
Meghan put her own foot in her mouth. Why would she ever say such a thing about a 4 1/2 yr old? She only has herself to blame, again! It’s always about the money. She will sell her children but won’t let either set of grandparents see the children. I feel more sorry for the alleged children more than ever. Both parents are to blame not the press.
`Of course, if Archie's first word was "crocodile", he might very well be interested in a Leica camera! However, Haz & Meg probably weren't around enough to hear Archie say, "Da Da" & "Ma Ma"!
Most people have little, to no interest in these alleged children. Unfortunate, but what you don’t see, you don’t miss. Even more unfortunate is her insistence on usage of the titles, which, like the Duchess title she throws about, have been completely discredited, demeaned and disgraced, to be rendered meaningless and irrelevant!
@@SoundofSilence492 Yes in Liverpool we call females Queen its a term of endearment, and we call our daughters princess etc etc and your right who cares.....
@@SoundofSilence492We don't have the concept of "Commoners," sugar. We just laugh when we hear a person from your end of the earth call someone a commoner, darling dumpling. It's because we don't give a rodent's rear or a possum's posterior, peaches. Prince, princess, duke, duchess, all meaningless monikers, my little kumquat. Now YOU go have yourself a skipidee doodah day now, hear?💋
I don't blame them....I wouldn't put my children out in the public either, in fact, I never did and my grandsons are not "out in the public"! Dangerous times out there for children!
If there are children, and they belong to someone else, then those real parents need to step up and keep those children away from that twisted evil Markle couple.
I didn't take the comments as a criticism of Archie in any way. It was really about the veracity of the story - and can the source of the story be trusted. It appears at least to some people that it is a bit disingenuous to use a clearly expressed doubt of the alleged comment from a 4+ year old, as an excuse to keep the child hidden away. It wasn't about the child at all, but his parent relaying stories.
The children would take the spotlight off Ms Markle. Such a good Mother, introducing her 4yr old to brand names at such an early age! So cunning how she used Archie to shine a light on her self while also directing her vindictiveness towards a RF member who is known for her photography.
This is an old old old game. Ask Matt Dillon. Pose and the press will leave you alone. Don't and they hound to make money for something scarce. The kids are the last thing they can monetise.. hence holding back.
I think that ship has sailed. Companies are starting to realize that no one cares about them or their children, and magazines and papers just don't sell if they are on them. They would lose money if they paid them that much money. If they were smart, if they really wanted to take a picture, they should offer her a payout of commission, she would then see how no one cares. I do not buy anything with them in it, or anything associated with them. I do not support any company that wants to give them any kind of a platform!!
A 4 year old wouldn't ask for a certain expensive brand of camera . Feel very sorry for invisabet and archaficial the invisakids. You never see them with their parents , being a real family , unless it's on the flix or staged .
Just like his first word was crocodile, then he misses his grandma Diana, at the age of one. They think that they are the ones who have children, and they can lie about them, and we will believe it.
The fact that Megan wouldn't know that, demonstrates how much time she has spent with under 5's, especially her own. This is also the same child that she said was too little to understand Christmas.
I doubt very much that Archficial and Invisibet really exist! To be honest most people have lost interest in the Harkles and their invisible children! Let's stop talking about them.
We’re are the children ! What children want a camera at 4 Lots of vacation without the children ! There a big question for everybody.? Why does not someone investigate and tell the truth it’s very lacking it seems the Royals know ! something. .
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with repeating something cute your child says as long as it’s not ridiculous and obviously made up. It’s not the child that’s being ridiculed in this, it’s his mother’s lie for her own attention. The child is innocent.
There’s nothing about Meghan that is remotely maternal. You can tell she knows nothing about children or has legitimate interest in kids. She can’t relate to children.
Oh they do! Four year olds whose three first words are mummy,daddy, and crocodile, are quite likely to demand an expensive Leica camera, specifying the shutter speed etc. But hardly likely with parents like those two,I've seen far more intelligent crows. They have really shot themselves in the feet this time.
My hubby a photographer had a leica camera, my child followed him around with her Fisher Price toy camera.. I wish this idjut would stop with her lies…
If she wanted her children to have normal lives, she would have refused that they were given titles, like Princess Anne did. Contrariwise, she demanded the Prince and Princess titles even when they were not due (because Queen Elizabeth was still alive).
If only H&M followed the example of William & Catherine - we only REALLY see their kids pics in the media on their birthday, Mother's Day, Father's Day & for Christmas cards. if H&M did that then the media backlash wouldn't be so bad. And we would actually see the supposed kids of H&M.
If she wanted to keep her children private, why did she marry into the royal family? They are in the line of succession so we therefore have the right to see our potential monarchs.
Also make sure to allow them to have titles, steal the Queens Nick name for Lili, report wrong birthdate for Archie. The children thrown into controversy upon their arrival.scandal for 💰
@@Essemm52 Yes I know, it’s a ludicrous idea isn’t it that Archie or Lili could be a monarch, but Meghan did make that evil statement about being a plane crash away from the crown.
Whilst people keep asking where the kids are, it keeps their narcissistic parents in the news. Nothing they do is done without much thought on how it will promote them. It's sad those children will never know their British cousins or their aunts and uncles, grandparents, etc. The royal family is a very loving family it's sad Archie and Lily will never know that.
It's keeps meghan and Harry in the news for all the wrong reasons meghan and Harry are blames the royal family all the flops of the books etc they didn't have to lie about the queen I think that annoyed more people then any thing else about the royal family
one of the female narcissist traits, use the child as a pawn. never really has true mother instinctive behaviors or emotions. they will throw their child under the bus for any reason suited at their convenience. empty hearts
Thank you Neil 👋 I think there is a real Archie, possibly his not hers, and he doesn't live with them. Don't get me started on the supposed other child!!
Harry always had a good report with children and the way he used to play with little George was great, so I think if he really had children we would still see that with his children rather than the staged shows that we are given. I don't think there are any or they aren't his either
@@ceejayretired Harry as a child was known to be a bully avoided at parties by other children, which is no different to the fake happy chappy persona crafted by the RF to hide his disturbing traits. It's a shame people confuse harry's go to childlike, immature, spoilt and petulant behaviour as being one that equates to relating well to children. Even before markle harry was well equipped at staging and performing simply for the camera.
I think she doesn’t want the children to be seen because she simply doesn’t want to share the spotlight with ANYONE, including her kids. Classic narcissist. Can you imagine if they brought out the kids and the media then spent all their time and pictures focusing on them? That would be tragic for her.
As a mother, I can tell you the date and time each of my children was born. That was over 30 years ago! I could never not know how old they are, so this proves why Mothers know Harry's wife is not one.
I pray if there is a boy that he is in the UK with his real mom and/or his surrogate. And the King, by law, if proven may have some decision making rights Maybe they do these shenanigans to keep from Charles.
Sure ... doesn't every 4-yr old ask for a bespoke, high-end, luxury camera by name ?? 🤣 The next book should be called _Fishing for Freebies_ Duchess Style. They only bring them out when there is a payday involved. At this point, why would anyone believe ANY thing they say??
Most 4yr olds are more than happy to play with dads old camera,in my opinion no four year old kid would even no how to say a specific brand name of camera,even a very precocious child at age four wouldn't even know the name of a camera,what a load of b/s.😅😅😂
First, a 4 yr old might want to look at your camera, but does not know brands. Second, who cares for these children, as Me-me-meghan and Whiny Boy are always away from home. Third, are there even any kids at all, or do they just occasionally borrow one from central casting. 🧑🎄🌲🎁🧑🎄
They have no kids! Netflix rentals. Always different hair colours, size, everything photoshopped! Who does a Family Christmas Card without the Family? 💥🚩
These kids are Meg's investment. She will be using them to get what she wants. And one thing we all know she doesn't want is to have anyone taking the spotlight away from her. Everything is all about her...and only her. She is a hustler and she good at it.
We don’t see the children because they are not their own; the children are “on loan” for occasional pictures. I’m very surprised paternity tests have not been done.
And obviously this talking head in the video doesn't mind using somebody else's children as a thumbnail dragging their names into the mud. And that from an old man.
My 4 yr old grandsom loves to show off for the camera. Hiding , sliding, running, playing. He loves being on camera then will sit down & watch himself as he comments on it.
What convinces me is that in some photos the kids have really curly hair. In others, dead straight. How is this possible when both ‘parents’ have curly hair!
As always she’s chasing after Catherine, who is a very good photographer. So now the jealous grifter with no talent has to try and get a BIG sponsorship deal with one of the best camera companies, Megan is cray cray
?! Spiritually Devout Princess Meghan was a self-made Multimillionaire Before she even Met Prince Harry. And she has earned many millions more as a writer, producer, and host. Prince Harry inherited 10's of Millions of dollars and he's earned 10's of Millions more as an author and producer. They are not "soliciting" freebies. Clearly they can, and have, bought their own doggone cameras! Princess Meghan is just having a bit of fun with what her adorable children say. All sane, objective people see that. Bigots are Boneheads.
@@sieraclayton1503 ok, you keep trying to make everyone believe that she is actually a good person though most don't buy it. She's a proven liar, she lies time and time again about nonsense, is she stupid enough to think people have not caught on to all her B.S.? She wants desperately to bring as much hurt to the Royal Family as possible even though they welcomed her to their family with open arms and gave her the wedding of her dreams yet she called it a spectacle. Pretty ungrateful IMO. Why did she try to claim she and harry were married 3 days before their wedding and even named the person she claimed married them, Thank goodness all the lies she spouted regarding her wedding were so easy to prove as another lie. If you are okay with that, keep on spouting the proven lies she throws around. Most people will still be against her for many reasons, it's a shame she doesn't see how disrespectful and vile she is to his family and her own family. She is pushing 50 years old and acts like she is 3.
She lied when she used taking the children to school and the hassle with the paparazzi. That wasn’t the real reason why she won’t visit her Dad. I’m convinced that she is ashamed not only of her father but also of her Markle relatives. They embarrass her because they don’t swan around like movie stars and that would spoil her image, or whatever they call it.
Exactly my thoughts. She’s ashamed of them because they are not glamorous enough to make her shine. They also know her too much and might say things about her that don’t align with the narrative she created about herself. She’d rather invite complete strangers (the Clooneys…) to her wedding because they would serve a purpose afterwards. Thanks to her, all those famous people got the chance to attend a royal wedding and how disappointed she must’ve been when she realized that nothing was coming out of it….😂
It wasn’t a throw away remark, she either wanted to merch those cameras, she wanted one gifted to her or she wanted the King to gift her the Queens old camera for Archie.
"Queens old camera." You've hit on something there. Maybe M was after something of far more value than a new camera. Something to be auctioned at Sotheby's when she's bankrupt
No way. She would have had to produce paperwork for the Palace legal team. Just because signatures weren't placed outside Buckingham Palace, doesn't mean the Palace didn't get confirmation.
@@stephanieknowles7586 they’re child actors as props for publicity stunts and benefits, etc.! Hollywood talent agencies have them, as well as her associates/friends! Brynn Gingras and her son Gavin, Rebecca Cord, the Gardener’s granddaughter as Lilibet Diana!
@@michelleb3698 There are no legit birth certificates, proof of birth at any hospital - and certainly not according to any of their stories either. I'm sure the Palace knows exactly what's gone on, because MI5 certainly would. There are wheels within wheels going on in this situation of keeping up the charade.
I dont think it’s normal how they hide those kids. I would call child seevices. It’s not healthy what they are doing to those kids. They have to be used to people
Garbage! They don't want their children treated "differently"? Then why did she insist on prince and princess titles? Does she think they won't be treated differently? Will his school name be Prince Archie of Sussex or will he be called Archie Mountbatten-Windsor? This explanation or story does add up. The people of Montecito had never seen the children.
The issue is not Archie, but Meghan's statements related to him. It seems most people, especially mothers, doubt that a 4 y/o would express a desire for a high-end name brand item unless that name had been rehearsed or taught. At that age, their interests and curiosity might be on photographs or taking them and not the brand of the device.
The criticism was not about Archie. It was about Harry’s wife merching aka pleading for a free camera. I didn’t see or hear one complaint about that poor lad. It was all about the disgust for Harry and his wife. Never mind the acquisition of Catherine’s interests and hobbies.
I'm no sugar, but I don't think it is fair to criticise MM for her comment that Archie is "4, no 4 1/2" because children around that age can be very particular about the extra half year. Archie is 4 years old, so her initial comment that he is 4 does not at all indicate she has forgotten how old he is - it's not a "gotcha" for me. Now, said child asking for a Leica camera is however a stretch too far, and Misan's reaction (adjusting how he was sitting) shows he wasn't comfortable with her comment either.
Oh, please; people weren't being negative about Archie, they were being negative about M. Her comments sounded like an "embellished" story, and people who have, have had, and/or work with children that age are calling her out. A was on Christmas cards for a few years, now he and B have disappeared. They're fine not to say anything to their "squad" about making literal death threats to the Wales' children, it's fine for Netflix to make a nasty cartoon about HRH Prince George and the family, but M gets called out for something questionable, and suddenly it's "how dare you"? Yeah, not buying it.
The reason why they don't parade the children is simply bc there is no children. Most of us saw the Archie moonbump fall to her knees. The myth carriage is simply that. There's no lily
People would be looking at the children and not her. That would not go down well with "I'm the most beautiful woman in the world! Look at me!" would it?
Always Archie---never Betty! .? What 4 year old wants a camera? Bit like when Henry said on the James Corden bus, Archie’s first word was ‘crocodile’ ! 🤦🏼
Look up the word "crocodile" in the urban dictionary, along with other words they've thrown out: roast chicken, hydrate, waffle maker, etc. These two are pure vulgar narcissistic head cases.
I'm no sugar, but I don't think it is fair to criticise MM for her comment that Archie is "4, no 4 1/2" because children around that age can be very particular about the extra half year. Archie is 4 years old, so her initial comment that he is 4 does not at all indicate she has forgotten how old he is - it's not a "gotcha" for me. Now, said child asking for a Leica camera is however a stretch too far, and Misan's reaction (adjusting how he was sitting) shows he wasn't comfortable with her comment either.
She's very busy you know so she has no time to calculate the age of merchie or understand what children say or don't say. That's far too trivial for such an important ducess
Meghan's "Leica" comment amounts to SHAMELESS product placement advertising.
Hoping the company will give archie one. She could buy one but grifters like her want things free.
She's waiting for TP to buy her one, funny that......
And those two guys was laughing too as if!!!
A camera the late Queen used to use..
Didn't work though, all the commentators seem to mispronounce the name - its pronounced"LIKE AH" guys.
Quit gaslighting nutmeg! Funny how nutmeg lies, gets called out on the lie, then tries to say people were complaining about the offspring instead of the LIE.
Always
💯🎯👏🏼
Gaslighting.
She is a voracious vicious liar!😅😅😅
@@momoplazahamlet Nice try. She’s called herself that in multiple interviews. Go sugar elsewhere.
The children are kept hidden because they'd take the limelight from her! IF they actually ARE theirs, of course! 😵💫😖
Meghan wanted the name brand camera and she wanted it with out paying for it, How Pathetic
Meghan just doesnt want to be upstaged by anyone, not even her own kids. All eyes must be on her. Ick...
I suspect Archie has a birth defect.
He's half of a conjoined twin or he was born with two heads.
Something like that.
She's protecting her kids
Correct.
Aging Joker ! ! ! ....from the states ! 👣👣👣☻️👣👣👣
@@Cris.Vlades From what?
I have grandchildren, and not one at four years old ever expressed interest in an expensive camera or stated a specific name brand. Four year olds live for the moment----and try getting one to stay still for a picture, let alone entrusting a child that age with an expensive camera. Someone, as usual, is giving the world another line of BS.
They like to make out that Archie has the IQ of a genius, I think. Remember his first word was 'Crocodile '.? ..or was that Granny Diana. Who knows.
Yes, MM was hoping by dropping a brand name, one would suddenly show up at her front door 😂 😂
Because she know that the late queen had one so she is lying about her son want a expense camera and what child at that age would ask for that brand of camera and want to take pictures
@@Ronocalezan5just lime the BIKE last summer 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
@@Ronocalezan5 Spot on with that one, she never says anything that isn’t premeditated with a certain agenda, she makes me physically ill.
If she wants her children to have titles, then they need to be presented to their grandfather the King to be acknowledged as their position in line of succession. Follow the rules or get out.
Preferably get out.
And a DNA done
If those children were not born "of her body" they won't be Prince & Princess full stop. Rules are Rules; espc re an Organisation/Institution which has existed for more than twelve hundred years 🙏🏻🇬🇧
I’d also like to know if royal have a dna test which I think hasn’t happened.
@@XXXX-uy7oh Exactly!👌🏼
My 4 yr old granddaughter asked for a camera. It wasn’t an expensive camera used by adults. They make them for children specifically.
I’ll never understand why Meghan Markle feels she needs to keep lying. I also am wondering when Harry will find his backbone/balls.
The one One Park rather pair are probably in the freezer along with the todger
She cannot help herself
Its an illness
Bipolar are the same.
She switches easily
Sweet as then dark eyes.
Meghan no 4 year old would ask for a camera, disguising that you Harry and Meghan can't quit the lies.
Especially a $800 camera....lol
Not for a specific camera anyway, IMO.
My 4 year old, when asked if he wanted a brother or sister when I was pregnant said he wanted a puppy lol. I doubt very much that Meghan has any idea of what Archie would really like for Christmas, more like she's hoping some fan of hers will supply one for herself !
💯 a 4 year old would NOT say. She is a pathological liar!
Tut Tut. You are forgetting this is the child who was had a command of three syllable words by the time he was one.
To be fair to the invisible child, with his inherited gene pool, it is only to be expected that his intelligence exceeds his parents.
One of the reasons I don't believe Carparkle has kids is because she has no idea how kids actually think or what they would or wouldn't say. Everyone of us who has had children knows this 🤷
She's always talking about how small they are. Real parents talk about how big they're getting
... and the awkward, unnatural and ungainly way she held them when they were smaller ... just really odd.
and their first words were NOT; Grandma Diana....
Agree, she was talking about an $8,000.00 camera the other day that Archie wanted. How old is he 4 yr. Maybe.
@@sharonlevy7733exactly and when people see the children it like gosh aren't they getting tall they never stay little for long
Liars and swindlers are what these two are all about.
She doesn't have a birth certificate for him, does she? Isn't that why he isn't at school?
The Sussex children have no vaccination/immunization records. They can't attend a public or private school without all required immunizations. Unvaccinated children present a danger to public health. There have been multiple outbreaks of resistant strains of Measles, Chicken Pox, Mumps reported throughout the country.
You people that insist these kids aren’t real are just as demented as I’m sure Harry son has a birth certificate and probably attend school at home as most homeschooled children do.
But she does have a birth certificate for him. It’s even available online.
She showed the school a copy and they wouldn't accept it...
Please, Neil, there are no kids born of MadMeg’s body, so the titles are ridiculous!
I agree Victoria - the fake belly dropping spoke wonders. If she had kids, we'd never have heard the end of it especially to compete with Catherine - that's where all this jealousy and deceit begun IMHO
💯🎯@@sheilarennie2636
I get what you’re saying, but if she had the child of a surrogate, then I wish she would just say so. People would understand because so many women struggle with fertility. If she had been honest, she could’ve made that a platform and really worked toward women’s fertility issues. It’s unfortunate that she had to do the fake belly and then lie. It isn’t sustainable.
Exactly
Mudbug Meg. A mud bug is another name for crawdads.
She is the one who gets the backlash because she lies and people can see through it. It has nothing to do with the kids.
And she knows that, gaslighting 101!
What children ...what MANSION ..what skin color ...what mythcarriage ...💯💯💯💯🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
It's nothing to do with the kids. It's the parenting styles that are the issue. Catherine and William would never use their children to gain advantage. That's the difference. The Harkles would and do use their " invisibles" to grift. 💩💩💩💩💩💩
@@Crusader804
I agree with you.
How to mess your children up mentally and emotionally in one easy lesson!
Catherine always is a hands on Mother and makes sure her children have as varied and as normal a life in the outside world as within the confines of their Royal life!
They are going to grow up to be well adjusted and capable children.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
EXACTLY. She’s blameshifting, and she’s CAUSING it to happen so she CAN blameshift, gaslight, revise history, and create a new narrative to work off of in the future.
First, she doesn't know the age of "her" child. Then she makes statements that are beyond ridiculous claiming it's something he said. Everyone knows by now that if her lips are moving, she's lying. She is pathological. Seriously, this person needs to be admitted to a psych ward. IMO
Archie’s first word was” crocodile”😂😂😂😂
@@crazylady3829 Oh even more clever than I thought,
Absolutely!
She cannot stop lying. She’s psycho
No one has interest in their “smoke & mirrors” children.
The backlash has ZERO to do with Archie and 100% to do with MM's stretching of whatever 'truth' just for attention.
EXACTLY! She CAUSED a situation so she could turn around and blameshift (blaming the public rather than her behavior) gaslight (make people think what they seen was something else), & revise history (trying to put on record that she mentioned Archie and people had a fit over it). MASSIVE narcissist!
Arthur Daley's wife was never seen either.
Same with Captain Mainwaring's wife in the BBC's "Dad's Army".
I suspect Archie has a birth defect, maybe two heads or three legs.
@@raypurchase801Arthur Daley's wife and Capt Mainwaring's wife are both fictitious characters created for TV. So are you agreeing that Archie is also just a fictional character? To many people, including me, that would seem to be the case!
I feel so sorry for those children with Narcissistic parents ! @@raypurchase801
@@raypurchase801you’re an awful person.
Megain was just grifting for a freebie camera. She got caught out on a lie and her unbelievable response? to spin some BS about A's privacy. she is as mad as a box of frogs.
I cant help the visual i get with your last sentence 🤣🤣
😂🎁🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸😂
@@juliocean1331 🤣🤣🤣
Mummy, I’d like a camera…
Please don't insult frogs! 🤣🇬🇧
You know if she had actually been pregnant we would have heard many many stories by now.
That's the dead giveaway isn't it? We would have heard every symptom she ever had, etc. , how she nearly lost her life giving birth...You would have thought she was the only woman who'd ever had a baby. That's what I've always said about her hands clutching her fake bump so strangely, she was ACTING like she was pregnant in a play or movie.
Never seen a Doctor, too! Faked birth certificates, as well. She’s a con artist and fraud!
If you listen to her story about Archie and the camera lie and look at her face expressions you can tell she's lying as usual. First she said whenever we have Archie why would a parent make such a comment. That sounds like it slipped out that they only have him on occasion as needed for photo props. Then the comments about him wanting that particular camera that Catherine has and the queen had is why she wants one for herself for free and used the Archie name. And she would exploit these kids if they were really hers to the media to sell the shots for millions of dollars. But she's been calculating and scheming again and only lets out these same shots in the press to keep the lie going to keep Charles hanging to try to use them as bait She was looking down when she was talking shifting her eyes and mouth again her mom did the same thing at the wedding when she knew what they were planning and scamming. Then she looked up to see if they were believing her lies and then kept going with the story
What was all her coat- flicking and pregnancy bump flaunting about I never saw so much over- done pregnancy belly display, with outfits chosen specifically to display her belly in a pretty undignified way. It was remarkably tawdry from my view. On top of that, it is obvious she was NOT herself physically pregnant. The belly shape was completely wrong and the size fluctuated in the wrong direction many times. She also had no bump at all at times during second and third trimester. It was caught slipping below her knees one day
I know! I firmly believe Valentine Low witnessed the moon bump slip & shaded MM in a very sly way, that went over the heads of many people who read his article. He had reported on an engagement MM had attended, while pregnant with Archie, that I believe is the engagement where her moon bump very visibly, slid past her knees.& are likely the pics you are referring to. She was lucky to be wearing a dress that was long enough to keep the the moon bump from being totally exposed. Valentine Low, IMO was deliberate with his choice of words & phrasing. He wrote (I'm paraphrasing) that it appears that Markle may have let her "due date" SLIP, while on this engagement....
There are many famous women at the momeny flashing there pregnant tummies at the moment. Serena Miller is one of them far more revealing than Meghan ever was.
🎯
What a CON
Agree. I have never, in my life, seen any pregnant woman cup her belly top and bottom, pushing her clothing close to her shape almost non stop. Never. We have 55 nieces and nephews, and a couple hundred relatives that stream from my Grandparents on both sides, as well as my husbands family. Plus many friends, children of my own and now grandchildren.
MY point is, in all my life, not one, not one pregnant woman has managed to do all that exploitive, I am pregnant nonsense the same as Megan. Not one. Maybe cup the hand on top, or when baby is kicking or to settle into a car and get seat belt on, but her hand actions were absolutely ridiculous. She looked like a simpleton.
They have every right to keep the children out of the way of the media. But why do they want security for him if he’s never seen.
They just are waiting for a big money offer to show off the kids. They don't need security, because nobody cares about any of them. It's because they think so highly of themselves.
Its purely a marketing ploy, do they or don't they have kids ? It's to get the despicable duo in the media. I couldn't give a toss about the kids, if they exist, who knows
They are denying the children freedom to be children...they are isolated both sides of the their parents famiies..so sad
Or titles 😂
Why do they need security for children that do not live with them??? They do not have any children. The two children born to surrogates still live with their birth mothers -- the surrogates. Period. She had a hysterectomy at 29 YO and he "shoots blanks" per his own words!!!!
She had no kids, and if they do. She spends 0 time with them
She had a hysterectomy!
@@connieshelton3469Nutcase had a hysterectomy about 20 years ago...
We do not see the children because they are truly not theirs. If they had birth children they would gladly show them constantly
Meghan put her own foot in her mouth. Why would she ever say such a thing about a 4 1/2 yr old? She only has herself to blame, again! It’s always about the money. She will sell her children but won’t let either set of grandparents see the children. I feel more sorry for the alleged children more than ever. Both parents are to blame not the press.
Thank God there are no children from Harry and Megsy!
& it's a really BIG foot have you seen it?
an $8k camera
`Of course, if Archie's first word was "crocodile", he might very well be interested in a Leica camera! However, Haz & Meg probably weren't around enough to hear Archie say, "Da Da" & "Ma Ma"!
Nothing those idiots do makes sense.
Most people have little, to no interest in these alleged children. Unfortunate, but what you don’t see, you don’t miss. Even more unfortunate is her insistence on usage of the titles, which, like the Duchess title she throws about, have been completely discredited, demeaned and disgraced, to be rendered meaningless and irrelevant!
And who cares, in America, where commoners name their child “Queen.” 🤣😂🤣
Queen!? I have seen Prince, Princess, Earl, Duke as given names, but Queen! Why not start a trend for President or First Lady? Just thinking!
@@lesleywilkie2848
My nickname when I was a child was "Queenie." Apparently, I was kind of bossy.........
@@SoundofSilence492 Yes in Liverpool we call females Queen its a term of endearment, and we call our daughters princess etc etc and your right who cares.....
@@SoundofSilence492We don't have the concept of "Commoners," sugar. We just laugh when we hear a person from your end of the earth call someone a commoner, darling dumpling. It's because we don't give a rodent's rear or a possum's posterior, peaches. Prince, princess, duke, duchess, all meaningless monikers, my little kumquat. Now YOU go have yourself a skipidee doodah day now, hear?💋
I don't blame them....I wouldn't put my children out in the public either, in fact, I never did and my grandsons are not "out in the public"! Dangerous times out there for children!
If there are children, and they belong to someone else, then those real parents need to step up and keep those children away from that twisted evil Markle couple.
Your mental
She shouldn’t lie about what Archie is saying or doing. I cany believe he said about the Leica for one nano second
Another lie!Little boys are all a out spider man or cars!She's trying to get a deal with that brand!
She doesn't know what he says or does, even if there is an Archie, because they are never with them.
Another budding David Bailey😅🤣😂😅🤣😂😅🤣😂.
He probably said I’d like a camera...
@@cindylou2128 yes. Very likely the fisher Price rather than one that costs £8000
I didn't take the comments as a criticism of Archie in any way. It was really about the veracity of the story - and can the source of the story be trusted. It appears at least to some people that it is a bit disingenuous to use a clearly expressed doubt of the alleged comment from a 4+ year old, as an excuse to keep the child hidden away. It wasn't about the child at all, but his parent relaying stories.
Exactly. She needs to keep j her mouth shut so she can’t be accused about lying.
It was really about her hoping for the "gift" of a Leica - for herself, of course. not Archie.
The children would take the spotlight off Ms Markle. Such a good Mother, introducing her 4yr old to brand names at such an early age! So cunning how she used Archie to shine a light on her self while also directing her vindictiveness towards a RF member who is known for her photography.
This is an old old old game. Ask Matt Dillon. Pose and the press will leave you alone. Don't and they hound to make money for something scarce. The kids are the last thing they can monetise.. hence holding back.
@@LadyPaddington she thinks we are really stupid.
Meghan just does not want those poor children to upstage her.
The harkles are the biggest liars on the planet.
Trust me... There are bigger and MORE DANGEROUS LIARS ... JUST turn your tv on any news!!
The MEDIA are the biggest liars .
HEAR HEAR HESR HEAR !!!!!!! despicable,!!!!!!
No,the trumps are
@@gregoryvanikiotis3214wow, now that’s a toss up
She will sell her kids pics to the first magazine that wants to pay millions for pictures!
I think that ship has sailed. Companies are starting to realize that no one cares about them or their children, and magazines and papers just don't sell if they are on them. They would lose money if they paid them that much money. If they were smart, if they really wanted to take a picture, they should offer her a payout of commission, she would then see how no one cares. I do not buy anything with them in it, or anything associated with them. I do not support any company that wants to give them any kind of a platform!!
I think she is in for a long wait!!
@@lunasmum6869 money talks for her.
Until Plastic surgery, dental work and hair color to match Yoko Soho's vision board the children will never be seen if children exist.
She would have done that already if there was any children.
A 4 year old wouldn't ask for a certain expensive brand of camera . Feel very sorry for invisabet and archaficial the invisakids. You never see them with their parents , being a real family , unless it's on the flix or staged .
Just like his first word was crocodile, then he misses his grandma Diana, at the age of one. They think that they are the ones who have children, and they can lie about them, and we will believe it.
Marle as always trying be a spokesperson for that brand of camera,and it backfired!
Sounds like they don't have money to buy "Archie" the camera that he wants!! Poor,poor h+m !! Those 2 think they can pull wool over our eyes! 👿👿😨😵😠😡
The fact that Megan wouldn't know that, demonstrates how much time she has spent with under 5's, especially her own. This is also the same child that she said was too little to understand Christmas.
Imo, she was hinting for someone to buy HER that camera.
I doubt very much that Archficial and Invisibet really exist! To be honest most people have lost interest in the Harkles and their invisible children! Let's stop talking about them.
We’re are the children ! What children want a camera at 4 Lots of vacation without the children ! There a big question for everybody.? Why does not someone investigate and tell the truth it’s very lacking it seems the Royals know ! something. .
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with repeating something cute your child says as long as it’s not ridiculous and obviously made up. It’s not the child that’s being ridiculed in this, it’s his mother’s lie for her own attention. The child is innocent.
There’s nothing about Meghan that is remotely maternal. You can tell she knows nothing about children or has legitimate interest in kids. She can’t relate to children.
@user-dt4bk2oi8r 😂 I guess that makes 2 of us then.
@user-dt4bk2oi8r. Neither do you, if your appalling standard of punctuation is any indicator!! 😂
She was acting as a Moderator, but couldn't resist turning the conversation, yet again, to herself. Narcissistic Sociopath! 😏
Didn’t he ask the Queen for a ‘Waffle Maker’ when he was a baby/toddler! According to his deranged mommy. 😂dear me, you couldn’t invent such rubbish.
Catherine showed us her children helping a baby bank, megan told us her kid wants an expensive gift for Christmas.
Speaks volumes
Great point 👉 ❤❤❤❤🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
I’m placing my bet on severe mental issues.
For Megan, a baby bank is where she goes to rent the children she passes off as her own.
@@Ravenmanse Both, probably.
No four year old asks for this. Another fine fabrication by the duchess of fabrication
Well, my four year old asked. Do this mean he doesn't exist?
Oh they do! Four year olds whose three first words are mummy,daddy, and crocodile, are quite likely to demand an expensive Leica camera, specifying the shutter speed etc. But hardly likely with parents like those two,I've seen far more intelligent crows. They have really shot themselves in the feet this time.
My hubby a photographer had a leica camera, my child followed him around with her Fisher Price toy camera.. I wish this idjut would stop with her lies…
The late Queen Elizabeth used a Leica camera, i imagine that is the only connection
If she wanted her children to have normal lives, she would have refused that they were given titles, like Princess Anne did. Contrariwise, she demanded the Prince and Princess titles even when they were not due (because Queen Elizabeth was still alive).
Yes and blatantly lied to Faux-Prah about why he wasn't given the Prince title. So disrespectful!
That was one of many lies on the list of her 150 + LIES 👍📷💯🤡🗑✔️🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
@@mezzamuddle Faux-Prah! 😂 Brilliant! 👏
@@leen1q84 Thank you 😊
Best comment!
It is not about Archie. It is about the veracity of her story about her son. She has told many porkies.
SON??? WHAT SON ????.
The only reason Megan doesn’t want people to see the children is that they will take the limelight from her
If only H&M followed the example of William & Catherine - we only REALLY see their kids pics in the media on their birthday, Mother's Day, Father's Day & for Christmas cards. if H&M did that then the media backlash wouldn't be so bad. And we would actually see the supposed kids of H&M.
If she wanted to keep her children private, why did she marry into the royal family? They are in the line of succession so we therefore have the right to see our potential monarchs.
Also make sure to allow them to have titles, steal the Queens Nick name for Lili, report wrong birthdate for Archie. The children thrown into controversy upon their arrival.scandal for 💰
Potential monarchs? 😂😂😂😂
@@Essemm52 Yes I know, it’s a ludicrous idea isn’t it that Archie or Lili could be a monarch, but Meghan did make that evil statement about being a plane crash away from the crown.
Exactly. The mocking of privacy tour is USA speaks for all of us
@@Essemm52Never potential monarchs!
Whilst people keep asking where the kids are, it keeps their narcissistic parents in the news. Nothing they do is done without much thought on how it will promote them. It's sad those children will never know their British cousins or their aunts and uncles, grandparents, etc. The royal family is a very loving family it's sad Archie and Lily will never know that.
I suspect we never hear or see them is because of court-granted superinjunction(s) keeping this whole issue under wraps.
That poor boy looks frightened and upset in that pic.
It's keeps meghan and Harry in the news for all the wrong reasons meghan and Harry are blames the royal family all the flops of the books etc they didn't have to lie about the queen I think that annoyed more people then any thing else about the royal family
And calling the royal family racist
They have useless titles. What happens when they get older and question that
one of the female narcissist traits, use the child as a pawn. never really has true mother instinctive behaviors or emotions. they will throw their child under the bus for any reason suited at their convenience. empty hearts
There are no Archie and Lili.
Honestly Neil , who really cares , other than the Grandfathers and possibly some family members . I as a member of the public , do not care at all .
Me neither!! I think many others would agree!!
I agree as a American no real interest 🥴🥴
I'm only here to find out the truth about the invisible kids. Not long now
@@ralphowens8346 Neil has a regular audience who tend to watch all his uploads.
Thank you Neil 👋
I think there is a real Archie, possibly his not hers, and he doesn't live with them. Don't get me started on the supposed other child!!
Harry always had a good report with children and the way he used to play with little George was great, so I think if he really had children we would still see that with his children rather than the staged shows that we are given. I don't think there are any or they aren't his either
@@ceejayretired Harry as a child was known to be a bully avoided at parties by other children, which is no different to the fake happy chappy persona crafted by the RF to hide his disturbing traits. It's a shame people confuse harry's go to childlike, immature, spoilt and petulant behaviour as being one that equates to relating well to children. Even before markle harry was well equipped at staging and performing simply for the camera.
I will never be,I eve there are biological children until I am proved wrong! Which will be when you know what freezes over!!!
I'm with you. There may be kids, but they are with their actual mums.
No kids that why both take 50 vacations a year
People with small children love to share a photo of their most beloved children in a Christmas photo. Enough said.
Not in hostile toxic situations
I think she doesn’t want the children to be seen because she simply doesn’t want to share the spotlight with ANYONE, including her kids. Classic narcissist. Can you imagine if they brought out the kids and the media then spent all their time and pictures focusing on them? That would be tragic for her.
As a mother, I can tell you the date and time each of my children was born. That was over 30 years ago! I could never not know how old they are, so this proves why Mothers know Harry's wife is not one.
I pray if there is a boy that he is in the UK with his real mom and/or his surrogate. And the King, by law, if proven may have some decision making rights Maybe they do these shenanigans to keep from Charles.
even recall his weight and length at birth
@cindyburton6698 That, too!
❤❤❤❤❤✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️💯💯💯💯💯💯💯👍👍👍👍👍🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
Absolutely correct there.
Sure ... doesn't every 4-yr old ask for a bespoke, high-end, luxury camera by name ?? 🤣 The next book should be called _Fishing for Freebies_ Duchess Style. They only bring them out when there is a payday involved. At this point, why would anyone believe ANY thing they say??
A 4 year old child doesn't even know how a camera works let alone the name of it.
Most 4yr olds are more than happy to play with dads old camera,in my opinion no four year old kid would even no how to say a specific brand name of camera,even a very precocious child at age four wouldn't even know the name of a camera,what a load of b/s.😅😅😂
I wish someone would expose them! I don't believe they have any children!!🇺🇸
First, a 4 yr old might want to look at your camera, but does not know brands. Second, who cares for these children, as Me-me-meghan and Whiny Boy are always away from home. Third, are there even any kids at all, or do they just occasionally borrow one from central casting. 🧑🎄🌲🎁🧑🎄
They have no kids! Netflix rentals. Always different hair colours, size, everything photoshopped! Who does a Family Christmas Card without the Family? 💥🚩
@@ralphowens8346 no Suchesses are liars and grifters!
Maybe just problematic research or sources??
Yes toooo much mystery
Those poor children. Raised by narcissist mom and narcissist dad. They are doomed.
No children!
And dumb to boot !!
Not necessarily but H & M could be racking up trouble for the future What goes around comes around .
Mentally unbalanced not just narcissistic totally off the scale of reality scammers
NO, IT IS YOU HATERS WHO ARE DOOMED ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE.
These kids are Meg's investment. She will be using them to get what she wants. And one thing we all know she doesn't want is to have anyone taking the spotlight away from her. Everything is all about her...and only her. She is a hustler and she good at it.
She dosnt remember Archie’s age cause he didn’t exist .
NO NO 👉🏼The TRUTH is they DO NOT have either kid in their custody
I agree with you.
Merry Christmas!!!
🎄🌲🇨🇦
Sick of Harry, Meghan and hearing about the phantom children
We don’t see the children because they are not their own; the children are “on loan” for occasional pictures.
I’m very surprised paternity tests have not been done.
But then is Archie's birth certificate fake? It was published by Times. He was born in London in a private hospital. Allegedly
Shame one you.
I believe the real reason she doesn't show the kids in public is that they would take the spotlight from her and she will never allow that.
There are no children
They certainly don’t have a problem using the kids as blackmail. ♥️🇨🇦
Yeah, even if they’re child actors as props for publicity stunts and benefits, etc!
Very true. Where are the lawsuits for those stories if they're untrue?
@@surphing can't sue if it's true 😉
@@mezzamuddleTrue!
And obviously this talking head in the video doesn't mind using somebody else's children as a thumbnail dragging their names into the mud. And that from an old man.
Mm is digging her own grave. Truth will prevail
Hope so😂
CLEARLY YOUR MEDS ARE NOT WORKING Take More
Where’s Kate !!
I saw your drunk Prince Wm..
But u wanna bash Meg !
My 4 yr old grandsom loves to show off for the camera. Hiding , sliding, running, playing. He loves being on camera then will sit down & watch himself as he comments on it.
Oh, just shut up about Harry and Meghan. I’m sick and tired of reading, hearing and media reports on Harry and Meghan.
I’m convinced they don’t have kids because I’ve never heard Meghan birth story for either child and she would have told it 100 times by now!!
What convinces me is that in some photos the kids have really curly hair. In others, dead straight. How is this possible when both ‘parents’ have curly hair!
Lies lies and more Lies……😂
The public are not as stupid as she'd like them to be. It's just lie after lie after lie with her.
Each picture of (Archie) is a different baby!
Is someone starting to set him on her narcissistic journey. SICK witch
No Medusa, you can't be a brand sponsor for Leica. Geez, she never gives up...
As always she’s chasing after Catherine, who is a very good photographer. So now the jealous grifter with no talent has to try and get a BIG sponsorship deal with one of the best camera companies, Megan is cray cray
Medusa... 😂😂😂😂😂
My My your jealousy is repugnant
megdusa 😂
It’s not the kids’ fault their parents solicit freebies. We feel sorry for them.
What kids?
Kids?
?! Spiritually Devout Princess Meghan was a self-made Multimillionaire Before she even Met Prince Harry. And she has earned many millions more as a writer, producer, and host. Prince Harry inherited 10's of Millions of dollars and he's earned 10's of Millions more as an author and producer. They are not "soliciting" freebies. Clearly they can, and have, bought their own doggone cameras! Princess Meghan is just having a bit of fun with what her adorable children say. All sane, objective people see that. Bigots are Boneheads.
@@sieraclayton1503🤣😂🤣🤪🤪
@@sieraclayton1503 ok, you keep trying to make everyone believe that she is actually
a good person though most don't buy it. She's a proven liar, she lies time and time again about nonsense, is she stupid enough to think people have not caught on to all her B.S.? She wants desperately to bring as much hurt to the Royal Family as possible even though they welcomed her to their family with open arms and gave her the wedding of her dreams yet she called it a spectacle. Pretty ungrateful
IMO. Why did she try to claim she and harry were married 3 days before their wedding and even named the person she claimed married them, Thank goodness all the lies she spouted regarding her wedding were so easy to prove as another
lie. If you are okay with that, keep on spouting the proven lies she throws around. Most people will still be against her for many reasons, it's a shame she doesn't see how disrespectful and vile she is to his family and her own family. She is pushing 50 years old and acts like she is 3.
Had to laugh when you said Princess Archie 😂😂😂😂
She lied when she used taking the children to school and the hassle with the paparazzi. That wasn’t the real reason why she won’t visit her Dad.
I’m convinced that she is ashamed not only of her father but also of her Markle relatives. They embarrass her because they don’t swan around like movie stars and that would spoil her image, or whatever they call it.
You sound crazy!😜
Exactly my thoughts. She’s ashamed of them because they are not glamorous enough to make her shine. They also know her too much and might say things about her that don’t align with the narrative she created about herself. She’d rather invite complete strangers (the Clooneys…) to her wedding because they would serve a purpose afterwards. Thanks to her, all those famous people got the chance to attend a royal wedding and how disappointed she must’ve been when she realized that nothing was coming out of it….😂
@@stormfaith and you are a rude Sugar!
It wasn’t a throw away remark, she either wanted to merch those cameras, she wanted one gifted to her or she wanted the King to gift her the Queens old camera for Archie.
"Queens old camera." You've hit on something there. Maybe M was after something of far more value than a new camera. Something to be auctioned at Sotheby's when she's bankrupt
Grifting again
Both merching and gifts - I thought of these, but it didn't occur to me about the Queen's old camera. Very good thinking there! Wow!!
@@carolinethomas4237no
@@carolinethomas4237what camera are we talking about?
No kids. All were borrowed/rented. She's a con.
No way. She would have had to produce paperwork for the Palace legal team. Just because signatures weren't placed outside Buckingham Palace, doesn't mean the Palace didn't get confirmation.
@@michelleb3698paper work is easily faked these days! DNA is needed! There’s no biological Royal children!
Is it legal to rent children?
So the kids’s parents would be paid for services provided by the children, probably against what was best for them.
@@stephanieknowles7586 they’re child actors as props for publicity stunts and benefits, etc.! Hollywood talent agencies have them, as well as her associates/friends! Brynn Gingras and her son Gavin, Rebecca Cord, the Gardener’s granddaughter as Lilibet Diana!
@@michelleb3698 There are no legit birth certificates, proof of birth at any hospital - and certainly not according to any of their stories either. I'm sure the Palace knows exactly what's gone on, because MI5 certainly would. There are wheels within wheels going on in this situation of keeping up the charade.
I dont think it’s normal how they hide those kids. I would call child seevices. It’s not healthy what they are doing to those kids. They have to be used to people
They are playing with chickens. They are both confessed mentally ill people. Child Services MUST step in
No reason to see these children. They are being raised in America. Let them be .
We won’t watch. We could care less about the children. We don’t know them and don’t care. People please do not fall for this trick.
couldn't care less ...
Nor me, horrid grifting creatures !
Garbage! They don't want their children treated "differently"? Then why did she insist on prince and princess titles? Does she think they won't be treated differently? Will his school name be Prince Archie of Sussex or will he be called Archie Mountbatten-Windsor? This explanation or story does add up. The people of Montecito had never seen the children.
The children will take all of the attention away from her.
The issue is not Archie, but Meghan's statements related to him. It seems most people, especially mothers, doubt that a 4 y/o would express a desire for a high-end name brand item unless that name had been rehearsed or taught. At that age, their interests and curiosity might be on photographs or taking them and not the brand of the device.
The criticism was not about Archie. It was about Harry’s wife merching aka pleading for a free camera. I didn’t see or hear one complaint about that poor lad. It was all about the disgust for Harry and his wife. Never mind the acquisition of Catherine’s interests and hobbies.
If these children should ever be "found", the first order of this day has to be DNA TESTING !!!
I know. Really. Liars
The crown should demand it asap! mm would freak out
Yes! And Harry too!
Agreed
The royal family need to get hold of the children first before they can get their DNA.
They DONT HAVE REAL CHILDREN
And my eldest daughter is 46, I remember everything about the day she was born. Everything, I will never forget.
Me too with both my boys,from the start to the finish.Its simply not something you could be vague about. The oldest is 43 the youngest coming up 41
Good on you! If you asked my dad my middle name or dob he did not know 😢
Sad she can’t remember how old Archie is 😢
astonishing
I'm no sugar, but I don't think it is fair to criticise MM for her comment that Archie is "4, no 4 1/2" because children around that age can be very particular about the extra half year. Archie is 4 years old, so her initial comment that he is 4 does not at all indicate she has forgotten how old he is - it's not a "gotcha" for me. Now, said child asking for a Leica camera is however a stretch too far, and Misan's reaction (adjusting how he was sitting) shows he wasn't comfortable with her comment either.
@@haasteagle4925he knows she's a liar
Oh, please; people weren't being negative about Archie, they were being negative about M. Her comments sounded like an "embellished" story, and people who have, have had, and/or work with children that age are calling her out. A was on Christmas cards for a few years, now he and B have disappeared. They're fine not to say anything to their "squad" about making literal death threats to the Wales' children, it's fine for Netflix to make a nasty cartoon about HRH Prince George and the family, but M gets called out for something questionable, and suddenly it's "how dare you"? Yeah, not buying it.
She’s such a liar poor little kids
More lies, will the woman ever stop...
The reason why they don't parade the children is simply bc there is no children. Most of us saw the Archie moonbump fall to her knees. The myth carriage is simply that. There's no lily
The Lilly BS was yet another middle finger to the Queen. like her majesty said, "The woman is EVIL"
Voldemeg doesn't want the kids put on public display, well that is unless there is something in it for her.
People would be looking at the children and not her. That would not go down well with "I'm the most beautiful woman in the world! Look at me!" would it?
Voldemeg 🤣😂🤣
They don't have any children
She has the only child whose hair changes colours every few months.
Always Archie---never Betty! .?
What 4 year old wants a camera? Bit like when Henry said on the James Corden bus, Archie’s first word was ‘crocodile’ ! 🤦🏼
I can believe the first word part. My oldest child first word was cow and my great grand sons was cheese. Archie may be real but nor theirs.
Look up the word "crocodile" in the urban dictionary, along with other words they've thrown out: roast chicken, hydrate, waffle maker, etc. These two are pure vulgar narcissistic head cases.
Yup .... Crocodile Mum ...gobbles every Trash❕️❕️
👣👣👣🤯🤯👣👣👣🤯🤯👣👣👣❕️
A natural mother NEVER FORGETS HER CHILD’S Birthday! It may take her a few moments to do the math, but she knows how old her child is!
I'm no sugar, but I don't think it is fair to criticise MM for her comment that Archie is "4, no 4 1/2" because children around that age can be very particular about the extra half year. Archie is 4 years old, so her initial comment that he is 4 does not at all indicate she has forgotten how old he is - it's not a "gotcha" for me. Now, said child asking for a Leica camera is however a stretch too far, and Misan's reaction (adjusting how he was sitting) shows he wasn't comfortable with her comment either.
@@haasteagle4925 that child wasn't hers, because she has no children.
that child is not from her egg,
She's very busy you know so she has no time to calculate the age of merchie or understand what children say or don't say. That's far too trivial for such an important ducess
Nothing that harry and megan do with there alleged children makes any sence what so ever🤨
sense
There are no children