Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Peak Discharge Estimation: Rational Method
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- Note the acre conversion at 4:11 should be labeled square feet, not just feet. The conversion is correct, however.
This video was created for classes in the department of Engineering and Computer Science at NCSSM.
NCSSM, a publicly funded high school in North Carolina, provides exciting, high-level STEM learning opportunities. If you appreciate this video, please consider making a tax-deductible donation to the NCSSM Foundation. Thank you! www.ncssm.edu/...
Please attribute this work as being created by the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics. This work is licensed under creative commons CC-BY-NC-SA creativecommons...
volume doesn't equal intensity times area, that would be a flowrate, check your dimensions prof 3:41
This literally could not be better. Thank you!
Super! Thanks a lot! Old way of teaching still works,
i LIKE YOUR APPROACH EVEN YOUR WRITING CLASS BOARD
There is a typo in the conversion at 4:3. It should be (4356 ft^2 /acre).
If we don't have data of rainfall intensity but only several data from meteorology station points in the study area, what rainfall mapping/interpolation method we should use to provide the i-value?
i also have the same question!
I am in my first year of professional engineering post graduation and this is an amazing refresher course, thank you! My only question is, did you write backwards?! It's wild because I know I can't do that lol
nah, i believe he write normally, on a piece of plastic or acrylic or something. And after that he just simply mirrored the video so we can easily read it
you may be right because on the video looks like he is left handed@@Abel19129
Thanks it was helpful
Can you show the calculation how you got 8.7
(3.6 * 2.4 * 43560) / (12 * 3600) = 8.712
How did you get the 43560 ft
@@gregorygbee7554 43,560 sq ft in acre
I acre = 43560 square feet