Why MPs Approved Johnson's Brexit Deal: Labour Joins Conservatives in Deal's Support - TLDR News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 гру 2020
- TLDR Global: / @tldrnewsglobal
Brexit Deal Explained: • How a Brexit Deal Was ...
Changes for Brits: • 10 Things Brexit Chang...
Changes for Europeans: • 7 Things Brexit Change...
Yesterday the House of Commons finally voted to approve a Brexit deal, backing Johnson's new deal with the EU. In this video we explain how the deal passed, what the key figures had to say and why Labour ended up supporting the Conservatives.
Follow TLDR on Facebook: / tldrnewsuk
Follow TLDR on Twitter: / tldrnewsuk
Follow TLDR on Instagram: / tldrnewsuk
Discord: / discord
TLDR Store: tldrnews.co.uk/store
TLDR TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/stores/tldr-sum...
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
TLDR is all about getting you up to date with the news of today, without bias and without filter. We want to give you the information you need, so you can make your own decision.
TLDR is a super small company, run by a few people with the help of some amazing volunteers. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, following and backing on Patreon. Thanks!
Y'all are amazed at Bercow's tie collection, and May's necklace collection... But I'm more impressed with TLDR's TLDR collection.
You'd be even more amazed by Boris Johnson's collection of offsprings.
@fe421286 bullshit like his "collection of hand painted buses filled with people enjoying a bus ride" which conveniently block search results of people searching about Boris and his bus of lies during the Brexit campaigning over of his finest pieces of bullshit in his collection.
Almost as many channels as Simon Whistler 🤣
Please make a Boris' deal vs Teresa's deal video. Because a lot of people don't understand the differences.
Yes, please TLDR folks!
That would be pretty interesting indeed!
That’s a brillant idea !
great idea, I would be very interested in that
Theresa May didn't get as far as negotiating a Trade and Co-operation agreement.
This vote is the most British thing ever because nobody is happy and will have to carry on.
Bruh 🤣
Very British indeed
0:33 Everyone talks about Bercow's bizarre tie collection, But May's necklace collection might rival that.
you actually made my day ;D
Hey TLDR, if you could add names and the constituencies of the MPs in these videos that’d be great! I’d love to learn more on who’s who
I believe the voting records of every MP, and the way each MP voted on each bill, is publicly available if you do a little bit of googling
@@dukedragon28 We're watching a channel called Too Long Didn't Read, do you really think we can be bothered?
Thanks TDLR team for keeping us in the loop over the holiday season! 🎄🎅🏻 That's much appreciated! 🙏
Watching Starmer it seems very strange seeing in this country a political party with a grown up as leader.
Yep! That’s what politics used to be. Almost a throwback quality in this day and age!
He is just another version of Biden. Milktoast. Corbyn would have been the one that would have really changed the UK for the working people. But just like Bernie the establishment Labour side hampered Corbyn's bid for PM
Blair 2.0
He's an "adult", but about as competent and likable as a shit substitute teacher.
@@georgeomole14 Maybe, but Corbyn was politically and strategically completely inept. So he would never have gotten the chance to try. Stalmer might be "milktoast" as you say, but I think he has a far better shot at leadership and a far better mind for politics and strategy. That means though nothing revolutionary, he might actually get the chance to do something. (Biden and America are both lost causes, even worse than the UK). Remember that most people are happy living with the status quo and don't want a "revolution". They just want to eat and live. So being "milktoast" and acceptable to all, with small gradual changes for the better might be the way to go. It usually forces less people in a corner.
They are celebrating now, in two, three years they will complain.
"That was not I was voting for." LOL
Pff, two years? Bruh, they gonna be complaining in just a few months if not less lol
LOL its been 4 years. Get over it.
LOL, they think that remainers were 'moaning', just wait till you hear all the belly-aching from brexiteers crying "That isn't the brexit I voted for!" All the remainers who have had to watch this crazy train barrel down to the wire are going to have to put up with all the higher prices and fall-out of the 'deal' as well as hearing all the complaining from leavers who realised after four years that all those 'moaning' remainers were actually right.
@@Reydriel well they are already all coming to Ireland for an Irish passport and alot of shops are already empty because all the lorriea are stuck in Calais because of brexit
Wow. You guys don’t really take any holidays, eh?
@@DrG65199 what
@@schmurble2254 sorry buddy. Was listening while i jogged so i hit a bunch of keys. Carry on
Work from home. Where else do you want him to go, holiday in Spain? 😂
The bad guys aren't taking any days off either
These videos are clear, concise, simple straight to the point, well animated. Love them
Canada style, minus services....70%of the UK economy
The "70% of our economy" includes when you go to the hairdressers (not really impacted by this), when you call your banks helpline (not really impacted by this)..... basically domestic only services.
@@danielwebb8402 good point. But services are our main export and they are not covered under this deal; financial services passports have not been granted for example. So we haven’t heard the last of Brexit just yet.
Total UK exports of services (excluding travel, transport and banking) accounts for 51.4% of the total UK exports. If we only include services exports to the EU (excluding travel, transport and banking) it accounts for 17.3% of the total UK economy.
Oh come one, don't be like that..... they lost way more than that.
London is a global financial centre. There's nothing to worry about. When you look at the numbers you won't even bring this up again. The capital flight to London and New York from the Eurozone in the next 10 years will be astonishing
“Take back control of our money”
*spends 600 billion on leaving*
An gain nothing new
@@thewingedhussar4188 Except freedom
@@octowuss1888 from being able to travel around EU without a problem, to having problems, freedom indeed, reversed one
@@aurelijus1 europe sucks
@@kevinshmuk7237 Brilliant argument
Do people who criticise Labour for this prefer a no deal? Literally just two options, good on Labour, maybe my parents will not lose their jobs.
China will take your parents jobs, don't worry.
Well yes.
The SNP, and other independence parties do want no deal. That's because they want the people of the UK to suffer (and no deal would do the most damage) and then they will blame it on Westminster even though they did this to themselves.
The Irish Unionist party did it for a different reason because this deal does not apply many of the benefits to Northern Ireland and puts a border in the Irish Sea.
It could be the perfect deal and Lib Dems would still vote against it. They are about their agenda and they would see the country burn just to make the conservatives look bad so they can try to move more into power.
@@supermankelly And the conservatives would do exactly the same. (and are doing that right now)
@@bzuidgeest Doing what right now? Fulfilling the democratic will of the people? Assholes. LoL
Well the Brexit deal throws a lot of the UK’s service industry under the bus, which make up around 80% of the UK economy
there will be more negotiation in future apparently so it might not be that bad
all trading nations need to cope with paperwork anyway
@@vinniechan Sure, but how many companies will go bankrupt or relocate out of the UK in the meantime? I don't see any amendments to the deal being done within less than a year, and that is a long time for a company to wait and hope that they can start doing business again. And even if a deal is done, it may be the case that a lot of customers would have found alternatives that they then decide to stay with, so it could potentially also be too late either way.
It's Brexit that throws a lot of the UK's service industry under the bus. The deal pulls trade in goods out from under the bus.
Yes.
Including someone working on the till at Sainsbury's, call centre you ring when have a bank query, a gardener.... all of which are domestic only % of the economy. What you need is "Yeah but excludes x% of the economy which is services exported to the EU and I'll assume they fall to zero". But that won't make your point very well.
@@BigTwitchy that ship set sailed a long time ago.
In terms od the deal, u need to judge against deals EU did with other countries and with no deal. seeing they took 7 years to conclude CETA and have a habit of leaving thing to last minutes, extending the transition period means u will get a deal in June.
we can only hope the government has sth to mitigate the pangs.
also people somehow think things happen in real-time like video games, but it doesn't quite work that way so it will be a while til the negative effect sinks in. there might be room for the government to get sth done (if the cards are played right).
thank you so much for all of your videos, i imagine it takes a lot of work
So after all these years, the lesson is things will come through at the last second as long it actually is the last second?
It was well known by all that EU deals always go through at the very last minute, it's always been that way and always will be. It's their primary negotiating tactic to get the other side to back down. When it doesn't work the other sides walk away, this is quite common also.
The UK government's handling of the EU negotiations has been a farce from beginning to end.
Unlike the EU, the government went in without working out its own position first, then spent two years bickering with itself while the clock was running down.
Then we have the subject of sovereignty. With every international sovereign to sovereign deal, it is quite normal that a state limits its sovereignty, but it usually does so in return for practical benefits. The UK did the exact opposite by fighting over fishing waters and neglecting the financial sector where it had a competitive advantage.
The UK is equally sovereign as the EU, but they are not equals. This also true of USA and UK. Regardless of the so called "UK/US friendship", the USA is a much bigger fish.
The result with the EU has shown that the bigger party (the EU) has more or less got what it wanted while the smaller party (UK) has had to roll over and get what it had been given.
Deals based on mutual trust are the easiest to forge. Threatening to unilaterally renege on the Northern Ireland Protocol by No.10 wasn't exactly the cleverest move.
Considering that this deal is only a political declaration, it means that the UK and EU are going to be locked in negotiating the details for a long, long time.
It is doubtful that Boris Johnson and his Brexit bunch will either admit to the blundering mistakes made or even learn by them.
Indeed. If the UK thought it was it only country with a "special relationship" with the US, the moment they started sabre rattling regarding Ireland, they got a nasty shock.
Honestly it's just a big mess, i think the most draining thing is people for and against leaving arguing with each other. It is one thing to explain your opinions towards the topic, but it's very different when you start throwing insult at people who don't agree.
I respect this comment since you was pointing out something about the situation without being a asshole.
Unfortunately I just zone out when I hear Boris talk..
"Mr speaker I egg tha e wub wub wub wub wub wub wub"
Because I am aware how little his word is worth.
He's an absolute turd of a man.
Perhaps if you took the time to listen once in a while you might learn something.
@@megaangelic what is there to learn from a cabinet of liars? How to trick a country? No thanks. I have morals.
@PatchesRips I ate them.
Wishing all at TLDR a very Happy New Year. Keep up the good work :-)
"Loss-of-trade deal". Good way to put it.
Love the animation with UK being in the EU's orbit. Nice one lads.
As a European, I can just say after all the time: So long, and thanks for all the fish.
Underrated comment
Why are you using someone else's words !
@@Jay-iq6yh I don't know, I am doing my double backwards somersault now.
Wow no wonder people voted leave 😂
@@Jay-iq6yh It is a rather common statement...
Got an ad of 1:37:05 in an 13 minute video 😂😂
Had to skip it.
Thanks for your great videos. Looking forward to your 2021 videos.
Greetings from Munich, Tom.
I'd love to see a video about how this deal differs from May's deal. Thanks for your hard work on this over the holidays!
Thanks for the concise and very informative video.
Guys, you are tired, before doing reviews, you first read about FBC and their algorithm
Nice video! What about FBC fund and their algorithm review?
In the Scottish Parliament everyone except the Tories voted against the deal.
92-30 with only the Scottish Conservatives voting for the deal.
Labour showing both it's faces.
You see, the SNP wants no deal. They want the people of the UK and specifically Scotland to suffer as much as possible, and then blame it all on Westminster when they are the ones that are doing this to themselves.
@@sionsmedia8249 So the UK wants to leave the EU because they don't like it if they have to listen to someone else making the rules (the narrative for brexit) But Scotland has to shut up and do what Westminster says? Good think you showed them how to handle a situation like this.
@@sionsmedia8249 They obviously don't like either but no-deal is clearly better than this con.
Why lose all benefits but still not have more fishing rights? No-deal obviously beats this.
Great video, as always! A great follow up would be a comparison between this deal and the renegotiated EU deal that David Cameron had agreed to back in February 2016. This would be a good look at what we had on offer back then, compared to what we finally have today - and whether the choice made in the referendum was the best for the UK.
Well spoken Theresa May!
You were dealt a bad hand... But at least you had more integrity of keeping the UK whole than BoJo and his crew did. And you understood the need for keeping ties with the EU in one form of another, all whilst being plagued from all sides.
Whilst we disagreed on many things, you have my respect!
Shame that a year and a half ago no one was saying that. I mean it was the smaller parties and Labour which battered May into resignation. Everyone knew the deal was unacceptable to the ERG and proper Brexiteers. It was probably the softest Brexit possible with a Conservative Government. The debate should’ve been about whether we should’ve had a hard or soft Brexit. Instead May and Parliament wasted time on arguing about the Leave/Remain argument.
@@jamiengo2343 I suppose the irony is that the remain side refusing to accept May's deal in the hope that the deadlock would eventually lead to a second referendum actually went the opposite way and led to those who wanted further separation from the EU taking charge of the negotiations.
@@zaleost ERG would have never accepted that... And they and part of the Tories would have then made goverment fall or replaced her sooner.
@@Wichnam The blocking of May's withdrawal agreement was really only possible due to both the ERG (combined with DUP) and opposition parties refusing to support it. If enough of the opposition parties had supported her, they could have overridden them. But I suppose really the core issue is that thanks to her botched re-election attempt, parliament was left in a very unworkable position due to no party holding a true majority.
@@zaleost Shame they didn't learn to properly make alliances.
Then again The DUP got shafted hard now.
Thanks i knew about Michael Hill! He was my professor in Oxford and told us FBC fund!
Thank you for sharing.
Small/big thing to be careful about in the future: At some instances you are using the terms 'Europe' and 'European Union' interchangeably.
Could you please do a video on Gibraltar’s deal in regards to joining schengen and crossing the border to Spain! Thanks and great videos btw, I watch them every time you post🙌🏻
love your channel - quick question about the HoC graphic - is the person reclining a nod to JR-M?
This moment reminds me of when Theresa May was loosing her voice, boris sounds very croaky. Clearly negotiating the world's largest free trade deal requires a lot of talking and can take it's toll
Boy, that moment gave me Palpatine vibes
The EU is celebrating.
so are the UK
Can we have a TLDR channel for videos of exactly 7:38 in length, don’t think there are enough channels at the moment and I’m struggling with all the videos of 12:56 and 6:23, however will I manage?
I suspect this won't be the last Brexit video...
A lot of what they called scaremongering and project fear has come true, eh?
The predictions of what you refer to as "project fear" are mostly about what will start happening on January 1st after the transition agreement ends. However, some of them have already been foreshadowed the the effects of COVID, and you'd be hard pressed to find anyone involved in exports who's remotely happy right now, while Irish TIR lorries zoom past them. After the UK gets through its reserves in the coming months, have fun with the price inflation, as companies push up prices to cover costs of imports due to those non-tariff barriers with the EU Starmer mentioned, and tariff barriers with non-EU countries the formerly UK had tariff-free trade with pre-Brexit. Then the screws will start to tighten. Have fun!
@@talideon The EU is not the whole world the EU has to compete with the whole world for are trade now. Have fun!
@@Peter-je6td I rather have the EU
@@Peter-je6td On the other hand, the UK will now have to compete with the whole world for EU trade. What tools does the UK have to do so apart from being nearby?
@@jounik I guess the fact that we are an island trading nation has been for a long time we have prospered that's why we are called treasure island but mostly as the EU its self needs our financial services to even function the EU said so them selves. The EU wont compete it's to protectionist that's the problem .
Why GLOBAL not NEWS??? strange
Brexit. Such a great idea that the PMs father has applied for an EU (French) passport.
Freedom of Movement for me but not for thee.
And?
And why are the ERG suddenly okay with a deal that in principal is _worse_ than Mays deals?
Or did I miss something? (genuinely, please correct me if I have)
Wow! There is weakness and then there is Labour. Never imagined they would vote for the deal.
could you do a compare video on this deal we have with the deal we could have had if we had agreed terry mays deal, please and thank you in advance for all your hard work happy 2021
Found your link to TLDR Global.. thanks.. but perhaps something you should know; typing in 'TLDR Global' as a search on UA-cam does not find it (various other TLDR content comes up, but Global nowhere in sight!)
I love you guys but man I wish you'd just have everything on one channel.
Wtf is the speaker doing? MPs are shouting over each other in the middle of speeches. Why is he letting them get away with this?
That's normal for the UK. Its more like children fighting that actual adults.
You’re a legend
Just love the comment section and get to read a little outside my bubble
"...her predecessor..."
I think you mean successor?
How does the Boris deal differ from May's deal that was rejected so many times
They keep saying taking back all this stuff that was never taken in the first place so annoying bro!!!
So we could stop someone from Belgium coming to the UK to live and work (assuming they weren't a criminal and disease ridden) before?
So we didn't pay material money to the EU?
So there weren't many areas of qualified majority voting? Or where other countries had a veto?
@@danielwebb8402 to be honest you could stopped them but why would you people always act like immigration is a bad thing that person coming from Belgium was already educated by their government and once they start working they pay taxes and for the most part they start is low skilled work . They take up the work that British people don’t want to do and without these jobs the country will not make .
@@danielwebb8402 you paid money to the eu because it helped the Uk you always make it sound it was a one way street when it was not billions of pounds come from the EU to the uk every year
@@danielwebb8402 and so you know none of the laws in the uk were made by the European Union the Eu laws only affect matters on the EU agreed Upon rules the Uk made all its rule via the uk government. Political leaders made it seem the other way around
@@jasonthompson7378I'm not saying if it is good or bad. I'm saying "we" didn't have control of our borders.
The argument "immigration is good" is different to "unlimited immigration is good" and different to "we always had control over our borders".
As with your other replies. You are answering "Why I think X was worth it / actually a pro not a con". Valid position. But that isn't "We always had control. Is wrong to say X". Which was your original comment.
2016-2020 will be remembered as the lost years... Such a shame.
For the US as much as for the UK.
Not really as it’s shown the public what a bunch of self serving bastards our MP’s are.
Uk is going suffer for decades not just these 4 years
@@leemorgan8725 Well most MP's just did not know the effects of Brexit. How could they? The majority that serves is below the age of understanding the joining of the Union. And the other portion found Britain to be better off pre 1970's when their empire was in decline already.
So...
The EU has secured free trade in goods, where they have an £80bn a year surplus with the UK. And there is no deal for services, where the main surplus for the UK lies. Johnson avoided a direct question on this. Sunlit uplands!!
Services is still open to talks,
yo, who cares, you got your ''independence'' the guy that was pointing a gun to your head is no longer there, so whats the problem now, boris locked you in tier 4?
@@megaangelic sort of. Services are to be decided upon by the EU, nothing the UK can do about it. If you call that talks.. 🤔
All this for that ....😂😂😂😂 ( watching from france )...
I fear we may see the breakup of the UK within the next decade.
Always has been mate.
Less than 6 years. Scotland and N.I. demographics confirm this estimate
I hope we do.
We already have
Here's a plausible scenario re UK breakup that I don't think anyone has given much thought to:
2021: SNP wins a majority of seats in Scottish Parliament, claim a mandate for a referendum, British government gives in
2022: referendum is held and won by the SNP, wrangling with Westminster ensues
2023: agreement reached between two governments for a process that sees Scotland leave the UK in 2025
2024: British general election has a messy outcome; Tories win the most seats but Con + DUP fall about ten short of commanding a majority of the HoC; fractious coalition of Lab/SNP/LD governing Britain
2025: Scotland leaves the UK, dragging 59 SNP seats with them; Tories have a majority among the remaining seats; Scots actually quite liked the new British government as they had significant influence as well as approving more generally with the policy platform, it was only ever English Tories (and Boris Johnson in particular) that they disagreed with
In such a scenario, would the Conservatives be able to immediately form a government? And could the Scots crawl back into UK membership after having agreed to leave, in order to prevent this happening?
Did audio skip at 7:53?
Starmer is a savage. Love it.
Don't agree with her politics but May was the only person I saw wearing a mask when she was not talking. Good on her.
In another news, import of ammonium nitrate fertilizer into Ireland has spiked up. Clearly Ireland is happily anticipating it's new role as the breadbasket of the EU to replace England
Why so many channels? You could do just one channel and do playlist of EU, UK, US and stuff like that, have all the subscribers concentrated in one channel.
Also you should diversify from topics, like TLDR Politics, TLDR Economy, TLDR Social Justice etc..
more channels = more moneis. Same subs in different channels increase the bottom line.
So instead of more channels you want them to consolidate. And then add more channels???? 🤣🤣
£€$¥₩
@@DarkAvador no, I'm just saying, if they're going to do more channels, do it like that. Not by region.
@@gunner4lifem No that won't work. You can subscribe to any channel you like and leave the rest. But you cannot subscribe to a playlist. Better to have separate channels as the first filter. You can also do better audience targeting that way.
How about a show comparing and contrasting this deal with those that were proposed under the May government; that could be very informative.
I wonder what the chances are of UK developing ni as it can be the link to the eu if they can make trade agreements with other countries for raw material and then manufacture stuff there and send it to the eu
"A new relationship based on free trade and friendly cooperation...but begrudgingly, and a bit stingily" also, why is pm Johnson that obsessed with the "Canada Deal" expression?
It's a politics thing, if an other major country/economy already got that kind of a deal, it is harder to attack it without sounding like you are also attacking said previous country. Its a way to isolate himself from criticisms, a bad attempt if you ask me but it seems to be working.
@@DarkAvador ah, that explains a lot! Thanks!
I would love a video comparing Theresa’s deal and Boris’. Is it actually better?
Those are not easily compared as most of brexit is about political grandstanding and not business. From a business standpoint (economics) Theresa's deal would have been much better I think for the UK. But it would not have given them the major political point of sovereignty as fishing. Both are worthless by the way. You can't eat sovereignty and all british fish is exported. So if they don't give the EU what it wants, than the EU will just put tariffs on the fish export and it becomes worthless.
Boris sacrificing services for an inconsequential industry like fishing reminds me of when Trump sacrificed services for the dairy industry when negotiating NAFTA 2.0
That last bit scares me the most. Provisional agreement would allow lots of sneaky rules that nobody really read except those that made the deal
Gosh this took a year
I've given May a hard time. Comparing her to BoJo, though, she's leagues more reasonable and empathetic
I think, when TDLR started video were sub 10 min, it was ~5 min, easily digestible, and with special topic going up to 15min. Now everything is in 15 min range.
A slim deal maybe, but it could have been way worse. Next to tariffs, on page 407 of the deal it states that in the instruments of transferring of personal data under the GDPR, the UK will not be considered a third country. That is very significant because that one alone would have caused a bit challenge for many companies, since it was very unclear if SCC's would even work with the UK because of the intelligence and 5 eyes agreements.
The thing people seem to forget is that if you are in a relationship which you want to get out of, then you are the weaker party in negotiations, and will have to accept that you will be worse off after the split. Johnson promising the UK that things will be better, the country will be more prosperous after Brexit was always BS. Perhaps British Sovereignty and not getting assimilated into a United States of Europe will be worth all the downsides, we shall see.
How is a zero-tariff free-trade deal with the world's second largest trading block and second largest economy a "thin" deal?
Why don't you just keep one channel? This whole five channel thing is ridiculous. Not even the major news networks have that many channels.
....... "free to forge a fantastic new deal with........" One of the definitions of "fantastic" is "derived from or applicable to fantasy".
When international diplomacy looks like me studying the night before an exam because I was procrastinating it isn't a good look. But at list its not a no deal.
Smaller parties... Didn't include Plaid Cymru and their stance.
At least the deal is approved now.
Wow; finally out!! Wheeeeeeeeeeeu.....
So its the same deals when we was in
What if full ratification is not achieved?
When will we know that??
in about a month or so. the deal will provisionally work until then nevertheless.
Labour could have made the political stand they are supposed to as the opposition party and because they disagree with the deal, yet the conservatives still would have passed it because the party was behind Boris. I hold labour partly responsible for the outcome of this deal because they agreed to it, instead of standing their ground like a strong opposition party should
Do a video on Gibraltar
May was an absolute embarrassment 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
WTF is FBC fund?
Ah sugar honey lemon ice tea.
TL;DR news isn't TL;DR enough!!! The video shouldn't be longer than 30 seconds.
Yay for global. Please do lots of Asia news.
But Labour could have abstained, the deal would still have overwhelmingly passed and Starmer would have been in a principled position where he could actually hold the Tories to account over Brexit. Now, all Johnson has to say is, "Well, mate. You voted for it." PMQs will be an even bigger farce than it usually is. Starmer has made himself impotent and Labour irrelevant.
I would have been far less certain and as stalmer said it would almost certainly do to much damage to EU future relations and labour wants future relations. I'm not sure I agree, but Stalmer has proven not to be stupid. He gets the benefit of the doubt. PMQ is a farce because of Boris, not something Stalmer does.
If you're not going to cover the contents then why are we even here ?
I don't get ERG's position. The dude said that BoJo delivered what others said it was impossible. If I remember correctly, what was impossible was to have an invisible, physical, red border between northern ireland and ireland, while having no internal irish sea border. That has obviously not been achieved, as there's an irish sea border in the new deal, which was EU's initial position fought by May. In fact, May's plan would have kept northern ireland closer to london, which is not at all important for the torries anymore. Weird as hell. It almost feels like they just wanted the deal to be delivered by Boris Johnson, regardless of what's in the deal. Which is even weirder. Does anyone have any better explanation?
The smaller parties didnt vote for it because they need to disruption of no deal in order to make their case for rejoin. They are concerned that if we have a smooth transition ending in a functional deal, the case for rejoin will vaporise and their doom-saying predictions over the last 5 years will leave them with no credibility on this, or any other topic.
They just want the people of the UK to suffer as much as possible. I'm sure Corbin would've voted against the deal, but Starmer is a patriot that wants to do the best for the UK and voting for this is what was best.
Its like eating in front of a hungry person, poor May.
What a season finale for this almost endless series: an almost unanimous vote with Brexiteers agreeing, all Tories voting for it and even Labours backing it 'cause it's better than no deal, all with just 1 day left before the transition ends and it coincides with the New Year's Eve... Well, I guess we have Brexit, then. :)
This is not even close to being over. There will be talks and negotiation with the EU for years to come.
2022. Before I start, I just want to let you that, we are starting a brand new channel called TLDR News Mars to cover news from Mars.
Would love to better understand what’s the difference between Johnson’s deal that’s been approved by the House of Commons and May’s deal that very resoundingly was rejected by the Commons.
Yes Yes! Read everything, and then say that you did not know FBC fund and their algorithm!
So no deal is still on the table. Lol
yes, but unlikely. Why would the EU vote away a deal that favours them
No Bercow so easy peasy.
How similar is this deal to Theresa May's deal.
Really all Theresa May had was a withdrawal agreement rather than a fully fledged deal so there isn't much point in comparing them. But the broad direction it was heading in would have been that trade between the EU and UK would have been much smoother but with the UK remaining much more heavily tied to the EU. With the main criticism being that it would be leaving in name only.
I am here for the comments lol
Some of them are just so brain-dead. A load of "Anti-Establishment" guys and conspiracy theorists. You find a lot more stupid comments when mainstream news channels post anything.
Its gonna be an absolute minefield
I'm here for all the salty remoaners
@@Patriotic_Brit Not just remainers, brexiteers too
@@dukedragon28 yeah that's true, I've seen a bunch of Brexiteers moaning about fisheries. But that's only for five years which is hardly anything in political terms. So imo this deal we've got is a pretty good deal.