What Scientists just declared about SpaceX's Starship Potential will blow your mind!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 чер 2024
  • What Scientists just declared about SpaceX's Starship Potential will blow your mind!
    ===
    00:00 - 00:44: Intro
    00:45 - 05:02: Starship's potential in orbit
    05:03 - 07:04: Starship's potential on the Moon
    07:05 - 11:00: Starship's potential on Mars
    11:00 - 11:16: Conclusion
    ===
    #greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
    ==
    Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
    ===
    SpaceX Starship SN
    Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
    www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
    Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
    ===
    HUGE THANKS TO:
    TijnM : / m_tijn
    / @tijn_m
    Owe @Bl3D_Eccentric: / bl3d_eccentric
    Spacex 3D Creation Eccentric: t.co/QGbEwDwv7j
    iamVisual:
    / visual_iam
    / @iamvisualvfx
    C-bass Productions: / cbassproductions
    iamVisual:
    / visual_iam
    / @iamvisualvfx
    Clarence365: / clarence3652
    / @clarence3654
    velin3d: / velin3d
    ErcX: / ercxspace
    ErcX Space / ercxspace
    ===
    It's mind-blowing! Scientists revealed the potential of SpaceX's Starship, unlike any others...
    “This Starship is designed to traverse our entire solar system and beyond to the cloud of objects surrounding us. A future Starship, much larger and more advanced, will travel to other star systems”. (Tweet)
    Starship's progress in development is undeniably impressive, sparking excitement among numerous NASA scientists. On today's episode of Great SpaceX, we'll delve into Starship's immense potential and explore scientists' perspectives. By doing so, we aim to answer the compelling question: Why is Starship hailed as the ultimate rocket for conquering space?
    What Scientists just declared about SpaceX's Starship Potential will blow your mind!
    The journey towards becoming a multi-planetary civilization is undoubtedly challenging, requiring each spacecraft to progress step by step. This journey typically begins with mastering orbit, then venturing to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Starship, like other vehicles, follows this trajectory into space, each step revealing its tremendous potential.
    What Scientists just declared about SpaceX's Starship Potential will blow your mind!
    It's mind-blowing! Scientists revealed the potential of SpaceX's Starship, unlike any others...
    A few years ago, Neil deGrasse Tyson, one of SpaceX’s prominent critics, acknowledged the company's ambition, stating: “The concept of SpaceX is 'we want to send people to places, it is an effort to push that limit, that frontier of exploring space." SpaceX has already achieved significant success in the first step of this journey: mastering orbit. With their Falcon rocket system, they conducted a record-breaking 96 launches last year, delivering over 1200 tons of payload into orbit. This remarkable feat has positioned SpaceX as a leader in the aerospace industry. However, their ultimate goal extends beyond orbit, driving the development of Starship.
    ----
    We use images and content in accordance with the UA-cam Fair Use copyright guidelines: ua-cam.com/users/intlen/about...
    Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
    To be resolved, thank you.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @hibou-cool
    @hibou-cool Місяць тому +32

    Unfortunately, I have to unsubscribe, the thumbnails are so misleading and I really don’t like this way of growing a UA-cam channel

    • @CNFriberg
      @CNFriberg Місяць тому +3

      Yep. It’s like, if there’s no new news, it’s ok. Don’t need to make shit up.

    • @derpytoonsofficial6083
      @derpytoonsofficial6083 Місяць тому +1

      I agree with you on some of the thumbnail, but this one is not that much of a clickbait to me, because the starship carrying starlink satellites is connected to the topic of "SpaceX can complete the 40k satellite goal" and Michio saying the starship is genius is a bit off but is connected to what he says "srarship is important to colonize mars" and other things he said, but yes some of his thumbnails are becoming clickbait and it isn't cool

    • @jackb3493
      @jackb3493 Місяць тому +2

      There is loads of new space news today. Focus on something other than SpaceX and do some damn journalism instead of just this meaningless word salad

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 Місяць тому +2

    Excellent stuff bro, keep up your great work

  • @user-ok1eu4tn7l
    @user-ok1eu4tn7l Місяць тому +2

    I wonder how many patent applications SpaceX puts out on a yearly basis considering all the innovating they do all the time.

  • @brucehanna9473
    @brucehanna9473 Місяць тому +6

    This was once a decent channel to get real updates. Sadly, this is no longer true.

  • @user-df6fx2bc2z
    @user-df6fx2bc2z Місяць тому

    Congratulations Spacex. I wish you a long and bright future.

  • @that70sgamer
    @that70sgamer Місяць тому +1

    Good morning

  • @albertross2322
    @albertross2322 Місяць тому +1

    I have never really considered Tyson as more than a glamorized community college teacher.

  • @yashvelhal4497
    @yashvelhal4497 Місяць тому +2

    Can you aad some emotion. No offence to you. You do a good job of making these videos fast

  • @headshot6959
    @headshot6959 Місяць тому +2

    It is important to draw a distinction between _scientists_ and _engineers._ Scientists, frankly, suck at plenty of things. They discover the science, however it's the _engineers_ who have to do something useful with it.

    • @gregsteele806
      @gregsteele806 Місяць тому +1

      Yep, That's why SpaceX is going places. They're transforming space from a science to an industry.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  Місяць тому

      Thanks for your great comment 👍

  • @firstname607
    @firstname607 Місяць тому +7

    clicbait as its best

  • @GarySarah-sp5bo
    @GarySarah-sp5bo Місяць тому

    Can the borster lift propellent using four tanks into space or would it be too heavy.

  • @Junebug-me4bj
    @Junebug-me4bj Місяць тому +2

    Starship never deliver anything to LEO, where did you get that 1200 tons figure?

  • @KristinWilliams-ub9nu
    @KristinWilliams-ub9nu Місяць тому

    Build a platform in lunar orbit, load it up and fire it off towards mars! Transport 10x the hardware! Like a trailer!

  • @MikeKisil
    @MikeKisil Місяць тому

    Wondering such big craft landing on soft dirt least stable hold starship straight for that matter how long ?

    • @mrfusioneng
      @mrfusioneng Місяць тому

      I think you can safely assume that before routine landings occur, there will be several level pads built with precise triangulation towers or transmitters/ reflectors installed so they will be able to land within inches of any desired location, ( similar to their drone ships, and current landing pads). If you look closely at any of their animations, all have such things. All can be done with remote controlled vehicles. Our military can currently build landing pads using interlocking components in a few hours for jump jets, and helicopters, at front line FOB’s.
      Just one ship could likely carry a rover with a leveling blade, and 2-3 landing pads worth of landing pad inserts. Once they have starlinks in orbit around whichever planet they choose, they can easily prepare things like the pads remotely with low latency high speed data. Wouldn’t need to be full AI controlled, just qualified people operating the vehicles from orbit, ( preferred), or from earth. This is why an orbiting space station around the moon is critical, along with high bandwidth low latency communication to and from the surface. Once established, they can start delivering habitats and supplies. These guys are engineers, ( not scientists), there is a huge difference between the two.
      Remote controlled construction equipment, will be an opportunity for other companies to get involved. With starships huge capacity, size of the equipment should no longer be an issue. Airbus is already developing pre- built habitats, that you just unload and it’s ready to move in.
      Exciting times ahead.

  • @normancory9279
    @normancory9279 Місяць тому

    What they need to build is a ship that can serve as both a space junk collector and a service ship to repair other satellites and telescopes.

  • @sid35gb
    @sid35gb 5 днів тому

    Let’s be clear
    1) all launches have resulted is starship being lost.
    2) it hasn’t lifted a dummy load into orbit.
    3) it hasn’t demonstrated orbital refuelling .
    4) it hasn’t maintained a stable orbit with fuel for the time frame required.
    5) it’s engines haven’t had enough testing to demonstrate the required reliability for the expected mission durations.
    6) it hasn’t demonstrated landing on an unprepared surface fully loaded unloaded and relaunched.
    7) the only customer for starship is starlink neither SpaceX or starlink are currently profitable.

  • @macalister8881
    @macalister8881 Місяць тому +1

    More b s what a shocker

  • @MarcelGeutjes
    @MarcelGeutjes Місяць тому +6

    Which scientist declared what recently?? Indeed clickbait and full of repetitions

    • @leajon9849
      @leajon9849 Місяць тому +1

      HEis full of crap i think he has an ism

  • @GregoryJByrne
    @GregoryJByrne Місяць тому

    If the narrative is that Starship is going to land of on our super conductor moon & or the minimal magnetosphere Mars why doesn't it have landing legs?

  • @jeffkahre1530
    @jeffkahre1530 Місяць тому +3

    There is incorrect information in this video.

    • @hairyferrit
      @hairyferrit Місяць тому

      Most of the Space X vids treat claims as facts and fail to realise the difference between a vehicle which is an empty shell with a door that does not work and an inability to be stable in space with all the pipe dreams.

  • @keepcalm7453
    @keepcalm7453 Місяць тому

    ❤🙏❤🙏❤🙏❤

  • @jackmorrison8269
    @jackmorrison8269 Місяць тому +5

    I wonder when this channel will get something new other than the same 5 things over and over again. Unsubbed

  • @pauldaflyer7879
    @pauldaflyer7879 Місяць тому

    Successful? Good data collection flights.

    • @jurassiccraft883
      @jurassiccraft883 Місяць тому

      that is classed as a success, don't worry I agree I think success means fulfilling out the entire mission without explosion but for both NASA, Space X, the one that makes dildo looking ships and the rests a successful test flight is set out by if it provided good data

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  Місяць тому

      ☺️☺️☺️

  • @Wolf-hd9ke
    @Wolf-hd9ke Місяць тому

    Gee, maybe they should have named it "SatelliteShip" or "MoonShip."

  • @bhupendrasharma3866
    @bhupendrasharma3866 Місяць тому +6

    Full of same stuff, spoken in different lines. Full of repeatises bull shit

  • @markgoddard2560
    @markgoddard2560 Місяць тому +4

    Unsubscribed. Nothing is substantiated and it all goes nowhere. 4:20

  • @MatchGuy
    @MatchGuy 18 днів тому

    To other star systems? Huh?

  • @BilichaGhebremuse
    @BilichaGhebremuse Місяць тому +1

    we can reach mars by micro robots and miners AI

  • @Razerblade-yc2kk
    @Razerblade-yc2kk Місяць тому

    Space Train...

  • @jameswalker7899
    @jameswalker7899 Місяць тому

    Given the capabilities of Starship, whether actual or potential, it's hard to see any meaningful role for NASA's SLS. One wishes that burden on the taxpayer were immediately shut down. SLS is an obsolete, half-century old throwback, a national embarrassment.
    But stated plans for "colonizing" Mars with up to 1,000,000 "colonists" strikes one as little more than cynical marketing. Yes, one sees potential for bases, with rotating staffs, of the sort established in Antarctica, supporting research and maybe mining. But asking people to "live" there asks one to set aside essential parameters necessary for sustained human survival, with gravity being the deal-breaker. Remember, the human body is the product of millions of years of evolution designed to accommodate to very specific terrestrial conditions. Other obstacles, such as surface radiation, can be addressed by maybe establishing long-term habitation in underground lava tubes. But one sees no answer for the physiological challenges of reduced gravity. Ultimately, this kind of underground living environment would contribute to production of the ghastly sort of Morlocks envisioned by H.G. Wells in "Time Traveler". Besides, why would anyone be willing to give up the gentle, soft breezes of a sunny spring day with green hills in the background, surrounded by butterflies and song birds, to live out the rest of one's life in the cramped confines of a lava tube or it's equivalent. After awhile, that could get old.

  • @plaxeter
    @plaxeter Місяць тому +1

    Old news

  • @screddot7074
    @screddot7074 Місяць тому

    Where is the revenue stream produced by a Mars colonization. The upfront cost are more than even a government can sustain.

    • @suburbangardenpermaculture3117
      @suburbangardenpermaculture3117 Місяць тому

      .... are you serious? 😂. So... yeah... SpaceX doesn't TAKE our taxes to get us to Mars. Elon is footing the whole bill himself. So, the 'upfront costs' are Zero to We The People.
      This should be kinda obvious.......

  • @bernardtaylor7768
    @bernardtaylor7768 Місяць тому +1

    This channel has become nothing more than rinse wash repeat with click bait thumbnails. I realise that the development of starship and other Space X projects take time and you can only show what they give you. So then look at some of the other projects that they have to offer and how they fit in together.
    Take note of what’s in your comments it may help to improve the channel for those regulars .

  • @Junebug-me4bj
    @Junebug-me4bj Місяць тому

    2 millions per launch for starship? That is probably just as true as Elon saying FSD is coming next year

  • @hilarybrown2271
    @hilarybrown2271 Місяць тому

    No scientist ever said elon is smart the only living thing that thinks that would be a single cell organism

    • @kstaxman2
      @kstaxman2 Місяць тому +1

      Hating is a terrible thing... LOL

    • @hilarybrown2271
      @hilarybrown2271 Місяць тому

      @@kstaxman2 yes but like I have a point

  • @keithhoward4069
    @keithhoward4069 Місяць тому

    While I admire your optimism. I doubt we will colonize other planets. I don't believe that is God's plan for us. But we will see.

    • @colonbina1
      @colonbina1  Місяць тому +1

      Let's wait for SpaceX's next feats

  • @yashvelhal4497
    @yashvelhal4497 Місяць тому +1

    You talk like a robot

  • @biciguy66
    @biciguy66 Місяць тому +4

    This channel should put out a video once a month. This daily grind is nothing but clickbait titles and rerun BS. We get that you can only do just say much with what's going on and things take time, but most of content is recycled speculation. Space X hasn't even managed to complete an entire starship mission, much less use starship to put anything in orbit. So chill out and stop serving leftovers for three months between actual missions. Broaden the scope of your content or put out fewer videos, because that you're doing is getting old.... And repetitive

    • @KurtColville
      @KurtColville Місяць тому

      Even worse, he doesn't care.

  • @stuartwillard6558
    @stuartwillard6558 Місяць тому

    Talk about brown nosing, can’t wait for the next one telling us how Musk is planning to deploy Starship Time travel mode within 10 years putting him a century ahead of his rivals and enabling the company to hit all those promised timescales that he has missed since the start of SpaceX.

  • @hairyferrit
    @hairyferrit Місяць тому +1

    Starship is not designed to transverse the whole solar system and currently cannot even make a stable orbit. Can we please cut out the crappy headline messages.

    • @a7ig8or.
      @a7ig8or. Місяць тому +3

      That's why they're called prototypes.

    • @helmshardover
      @helmshardover Місяць тому +2

      @@a7ig8or. and why the title says "potential".

    • @hairyferrit
      @hairyferrit Місяць тому

      @@helmshardover No matter what you do to it, it does NOT nor ever will have the potential to transverse the solar system, well unless you want to ignore basic mathematics.

    • @somerando7191
      @somerando7191 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@hairyferritDoesn't a fully refueled starship in low earth orbit have the delta--v to reach any body in the Solar system?

    • @hairyferrit
      @hairyferrit Місяць тому

      @@somerando7191 even a push from me would allow it to get anywhere in the solar system if timed right and you have long enough time to wait. This was suggesting taking people, they cannot even seal it yet and it would not have sufficient life support for a crew at the speeds it could achieve, even if refueled several times.

  • @amptunes
    @amptunes Місяць тому +1

    Hey I saw Kaku on the thumbnail. Not tyson. What's tyson doing in this video. This video sucks where is Kaku. Bogus, And a total of 39 engines for 2 million. Really.

    • @TheMMAHawk
      @TheMMAHawk Місяць тому

      if you look at each development of the raptor engine, it does make sense.

    • @amptunes
      @amptunes Місяць тому

      @@TheMMAHawk well please explain

    • @TheMMAHawk
      @TheMMAHawk Місяць тому

      @@amptunes essentially cost of production reduces significantly with each design, just look at the difference between v1 of raptor to v3, not to mention significant weight reduction with each new design.

  • @chrisyates1574
    @chrisyates1574 Місяць тому

    get to the moon first

  • @JavierFlores-tt7tp
    @JavierFlores-tt7tp Місяць тому

    Nice computerised renderings and CGIs. Where is the real stuff? Mmmmmm? 🤔 Oh yeah! At the bottom of the ocean in pieces. Of course this channel is Great SpaceX, is just like Great ELON Tusk and his Starshit A GREAT LIE.