Dismantling Ashari Argument! Shamsi Raihan and Visitor Speakers Corner

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 146

  • @TheSlaveOfAllah1992
    @TheSlaveOfAllah1992 Рік тому +10

    Imam Abu Al hasan Al ash‘ari, experienced three stages of thought according to Ibn Kather and Az-Zubaydi and others.
    The first stage marked his adoption of the Mu‘tazili thought, the second witnessed his following of Ibn Kullab, and the third marked his following of Ahlus sunnah, led by Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal . Abu Al Hasan Al ash‘ari declared this last stance in his books.
    Anyone who follows him in the third stage in fact conforms to Ahlus Sunnah in most of their beliefs, and anyone following him in the second stage contradicts Imam Al ash’ari himself as well as Ahlus Sunnah in many of their beliefs.
    The Asha'irah have no excuse in front of Allah about their methodology just because some scholars agreed with them in some issues, and that was a matter of Ijtihad, because the evidence is in the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, *and not in the mistakes of some scholars* ....

  • @manuka7313
    @manuka7313 Рік тому +13

    Now you know why Brother Shamsi gets frustrated.They don't answer any question asked.!!!🫨🤕🤒

    • @TheBigNoseLondon
      @TheBigNoseLondon Рік тому

      Why dont you go and challange The Big Nose ? Really what is stopping you? Mansur, Hashim, Abbass and Nishan and people who claim are knowlegeable were doing tap dancing in front of The Big Nose. Anyway, rather than asking police to help you and making the Police officer laugh at you and tell you go and answer The Big Nose's questions...because I (the police) am busy with scraching my ass.😁😆😅🤣😂 Why dont you ask yourselves that? Why we muslims are not able to answer The Big Nose's simple questions? Can somebody answer this Please? Please stop talking nonsense about him, just answe my question?

    • @TheBigNoseLondon
      @TheBigNoseLondon 10 місяців тому

      Oxymoron !😜
      Once you found out what oxymoron is, then you might grow up and elaborate on the comments that you make!
      Illiterate Muslim charlatans MUST be deported Soon!😜👍

  • @wxxkong
    @wxxkong Рік тому +8

    new beginner, keyboard warrior, ashari people get ready to comment brother shamsi 😄😄😄😄🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @TheSlaveOfAllah1992
    @TheSlaveOfAllah1992 Рік тому +2

    Imam Abu hatim (died 264H) said: *From the signs of Ahlul Bid‛ah is their reviling the People of Narrations* ...
    They used to say (in the time of the Salaf): Test the people of Madinah by asking them about Malik, test the people of Syria by asking them about Awz'e, test the people of Egypt by asking them about Layth ibn sa’d, test the people of Mawsul by asking them about Mu‛afah ibn ‛Imran, and so on.
    And this era, it is Bin baz, Al-bani, Uthaymeen, Rabee Madakhil, Fawzan, muqbil and so on, may Allah have mercy upon those who have left us and reward them tremendous for what they did for this Ummah, and may Allah preserve those who are still alive. Ameeen.

  • @saudasiri6019
    @saudasiri6019 Рік тому +4

    Its tiring to keep asking the shias the same questions and they never answer, lets just agree that their religion is different than ours and they're not muslims

  • @TheSlaveOfAllah1992
    @TheSlaveOfAllah1992 Рік тому +2

    When Hussein radiyallahu anhu, arrived in karbala. Whilst he was in Karbalah there were discussions between him and Amr bin Sa'd (representing Ubayd Allaah bin Ziyaad) and al-Husayn implored him with one of three things, a) they take him to Yazeed (whom he knew would not kill him) or b) that he simply returns back to the Hijaaz or c) that they take him to one of the border regions of the Muslims where he will remain.
    But these were not accepted by Ubayd Allaah bin Ziyaad, and this eventually led to the battle at Karbala. Amr bin Sa'd led the contingent from Kufah with Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan and others (and they were all from the Shia of Kufah) and they surrounded him. Because they were overwhelmed in number and power, al-Husayn and those with him were killed, and the killer of al-Husayn was Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan, from the Shia of Ali (radiallaahu anhu). Killed along with Husayn were other sons of Ali bin Abi Talib, from them (according to numerous Shia authorities themselves) Abu Bakr bin Ali, Umar bin Ali, Uthman bin Ali, and also Ali's grandsons through al-Hasan, Abu Bakr bin al-Hasan bin Ali and Umar bin al-Hasan bin Ali.
    Note: Have you just noticed the names of those killed from Ahl al-Bayt who were with Hussein radiyallahu anhu? Then you will understand why the lying Shia never mention their names when they tell their story of Karbala from the pulpit to an ignorant Shia audience! This is because the common Shia will realize that the Ahl al-Bayt loved the three caliphs so much they named their own children with their names.

  • @abdullahmahmud1298
    @abdullahmahmud1298 Рік тому +4

    Alhumdullillah...
    I am Salafi... Follow the Quran and Sunnah according to the understanding of righteous Salaf....
    Watching from Bangladesh

    • @feriir7772
      @feriir7772 Рік тому

      لعنت الله علیه ثلفی و ابوبکر عمر عثمان و شمسی

  • @RR-vg5hg
    @RR-vg5hg Рік тому +1

    That’s not nice brother said can I f.I.n….and you cut the video off lol 😂

  • @mohammedpatel5155
    @mohammedpatel5155 Рік тому

    asallam mu alaikum shamsi hope u are well. may allah swt preserve you for the good work you do. you are a well knowledged individual. sheikh i would like you to debate asrar rashid on this topic and aqeeda. shukran

  • @DaivedBay4916
    @DaivedBay4916 Рік тому

    my Allah guide Shams. Imam At-Tabari writes in relation the the verse in Surah Qalam that a number of the mufassireen, companions and their students held [a day when the shin shall be exposed] means that a dire matter shall be disclosed [ jami al bayan 28:30] . Even Imam Layliqa'i who he refers to on page 474 of i'taqad ahlus sunnah wal jamma narrates a hadith (724) which states the meaning of the shaaq is 'balaa al adheem' - a great tourment/test.

  • @abuhudaifah_0
    @abuhudaifah_0 Рік тому +5

    He said MBS is a salafi.
    Yet Muslims who do their best to follow kitab n sunnah to the best of their ability BUT don't adhere his scholars alone are deviants, or with faults. 😂

    • @kab1r
      @kab1r Рік тому +2

      Imam Ibn Taymiyah said that being sinful but with the correct Tawheed is better than having less sins with corrupt Tawheed

    • @squidguard1
      @squidguard1 7 місяців тому

      @@kab1rthere are pious Muslims who have the correct creed but they are deviants according to Shamsi

    • @FactsWithActs
      @FactsWithActs 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@kab1rthat is a fact

    • @justice70567
      @justice70567 2 місяці тому

      ​@@kab1r
      Allah said: and indeed, the transgressors will be companions of the Fire. (Q40:43)

  • @mohammedumarsiddiqui1944
    @mohammedumarsiddiqui1944 Рік тому +3

    have a discussion with the shaik from last time lol

  • @mukhtar768
    @mukhtar768 29 днів тому

    Silence when shamsi is around.

  • @manbetterunderstand
    @manbetterunderstand Рік тому +3

    Shamsi said he said "I'm not Ashari, I'm not Ashari". Go back and watch the video again, at no point did he say this. What an absolute lie!

  • @The_Angry_BeEconomist
    @The_Angry_BeEconomist Рік тому +3

    Shamshi is the OG

  • @southernrealist5789
    @southernrealist5789 Рік тому +3

    7:40 muslims watching this need to think about the question Shamsi asked here. Why don't the other brothers call out deviant sects?
    We all know non Muslims, most of us don't know who is deviant Muslim

  • @werewolf7140
    @werewolf7140 Рік тому +4

    When the representatives of the Ashary is present Shamsi the barking dog has no bite.

    • @shabanali8591
      @shabanali8591 Рік тому

      bring anyone & shamsi will refute those misguided fools like Ashary & shias. like he has in the past

    • @werewolf7140
      @werewolf7140 Рік тому

      @shabanali8591 Yes, that is why Shamsi ran away last week because his challenger had more knowledge than him .

    • @shabanali8591
      @shabanali8591 Рік тому

      @@werewolf7140 your being delusional and only fooling yourself and in Denial

    • @mukhtar768
      @mukhtar768 29 днів тому

      Who was his challenger?

  • @agp4580
    @agp4580 Рік тому

    What are the exact beliefs of asharis? Do they not believe that Allah is above the heavens?

  • @ALATHAR-Ahlehadith
    @ALATHAR-Ahlehadith Рік тому

    Prophet Mohammad eleh salam said, he draw line straight and some left and right sides and he said straight line is my path, and left and right line are sects, every left and right line upon sit a Satan.

  • @TheSlaveOfAllah1992
    @TheSlaveOfAllah1992 Рік тому +1

    Ibn Abdul Barr Al-Maliki.
    d. 390H) quoted the saying of Imam Malik: *it is not permitted to accept the witness of Ahlul Bid’ah and Ahlul-Ahwa* ...Then he explained:
    The people of desires according to Malik and all of our companions are Ahlul Kalam (the people of theological rhetoric). So every mutakallim (one who resorts to theological rhetoric) is from the people of desires and Bid’ah whether he is an Ash’ari or other than an Ash’ari. His witness is never accepted in Islam. He is to be abandoned and disciplined for his innovation. And if he continues upon innovation, his repentance is sought [by those in authority]. (Jami’ Bayan Al-‘Ilm wa Fadlihi, 2/96)
    Imam Adh dhahabi stated in his work, Siyar A’lam An-Nubala, that Ibn fawrak who was an imam of the Ash’ariyah entered upon the ruler Mahmud Ibn sabkatkin (d. 421H) and said to him: It is not allowed to describe Allah as being above (fawqiyyah) because that would necessitate describing Him [also] with being below… So the ruler said: It is not me who described Allah [with being above] such that I am necessitated [by your assertion]. Rather, it is He (Allah) who has described Himself [with being above]. So, Ibn fawrak was dumbfounded, unable to respond. And when he left the ruler, he died. It was said that his gall-bladder split apart. (17/487)

  • @salihaytekin7321
    @salihaytekin7321 Рік тому +1

    i m confused , thats not just a visitor, this guy is debatting christians on SC! and he is good at it! now he is debatting shamsi?? what the heck 😁😆

    • @The_Angry_BeEconomist
      @The_Angry_BeEconomist Рік тому +3

      many disagree with Shamsi, but they cannot engage him face to face

    • @ruddin93
      @ruddin93 Рік тому

      Assalaamu alaikum! I was not debating brother Shamsi. I'm a Salafi brother Alhamdulillah! I'm strongly against Asharis and other deviant sects. How could you think of me like that??
      I was discussing with brother Shamsi regarding his last week's debate with the Ashari and highlighted the lies and deceit of Asharis. I know this Ashari through a relative of mine.
      Brother Shamsi knows I'm a Salafi so for you to think like that really upsets me. I free myself from Asharis and other deviant sects!

    • @salihaytekin7321
      @salihaytekin7321 Рік тому

      @@ruddin93 akhi i love all the videos u r in ! i was just confused at the beginning of that video ! salam to my brother in deen

  • @shaheengk5352
    @shaheengk5352 Рік тому

    Are Ashari like Shia? or they are more like Sunnah people?

  • @batlefieldproes
    @batlefieldproes Рік тому +2

    shia mad again

  • @user-vc8wi7ff1j
    @user-vc8wi7ff1j Рік тому

    Whats an Ashari?

    • @hermithmza
      @hermithmza Рік тому +7

      It is a deviated sect that affirms some of Allah SWT Attributes while negating and making taweel of others.

    • @SaidulIslam-nw5ts
      @SaidulIslam-nw5ts Рік тому +3

      @@hermithmza 🤣🤣😂

    • @Harris19941
      @Harris19941 Рік тому +4

      hahaha deviated
      was Imam An Nawawi deviated? or are you gonna make exceptons now as salafis like to do

    • @CarFreakk95
      @CarFreakk95 Рік тому

      @@Harris19941imam an nawawi was not on the ashari creed. Even Abu Al Hassan Al Ashari affirmed Allahs attributes as did the early asharis. An Nawawi was influenced by Ashari taweel which was massively prevalent at the time but he opposed the usool of the ashari aqidah. It was a mistake but he has made great contributions to ahlul sunnah was jamaa in knowledge. But it is a lie to say he was ashari. Nor was he from the Salaf, and the Salaf opposed the fathers of the late asharis the Kullabiya Jahmiyya.
      Commenting on the hadeeth, "I have been ordered to fight the people until they testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah (alone) and until they believe in me and what I have brought..." (Saheeh Muslim), an-Nawawee says in his Sharh of Saheeh Muslim (1/210-211):
      In (the hadeeth) is a clear evidence for the madhhab of the muhaqqiqeen (those verifying what is correct) and the majority amongst the Salaf and the Khalaf that when a person believes in the religion of Islaam with a firm and resolute belief devoid of any doubt, that this is sufficient for him, and he is a believer amongst the Muhawahhideen. [And that] it is not obligatory upon him to learn the evidences of the Theologians and knowing Allaah, the Exalted, through them. [This being] in opposition to the one who made it obligatory and made it a condition of a person being from the the people of the qiblah [and who] claimed that he does not have the ruling [applicable to] the Muslims except through this. And this madhhab is the saying of many of the Mu'tazilah and some of our associates, the Theologians (Mutakallimoon), and it is a manifest error...
      He is directly opposing the Ashari aqidah that is based on ilm Al kalam. (Mutakalimoon) how can someone who refutes the foundations of a aqidah be from that aqidah?

    • @werewolf7140
      @werewolf7140 Рік тому +4

      They are Sufis, the true representative of Alleh Sunnah Whal Jamat and not the deviants like Whabi/Salafi and Tabliqi, who have been influenced by the British.

  • @akifshah
    @akifshah Рік тому +1

    Shia circus 😂

  • @LeonMassey-wx6dp
    @LeonMassey-wx6dp Рік тому

    59 shekels

  • @alikhan-r2e7f
    @alikhan-r2e7f Рік тому +3

    majority of sunni muslims are asharis?

    • @hermithmza
      @hermithmza Рік тому +1

      The majority of the world is Christian. Doesn’t matter what the “majority” is. So sad how humans have a sheep mentality Allah musta’aan. Ashaairah are not Ahlus-Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah. They deviated from the understanding of the best generation..the Companions of the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him. People today think they know more than them Nacuuthubillahi min Thaalik.

    • @Harris19941
      @Harris19941 Рік тому +2

      ​@@hermithmzamultiple hadith stating that we should stick with the majority and that the majority is on the right track and that Allah will no let the ummah gather upon misguidance
      plenty of great scholars were Ashari at least in Asma wa Sifat
      like Nawawi Qurtubi Ibn Hajar
      salafis take knowledge from them
      how ironic
      The Ashaairah are the true Ahlu Sunnah and the salafis just a sect that continuously contradict themselves

    • @OCEAN-fc9wl
      @OCEAN-fc9wl Рік тому +2

      @@Harris19941those scholars you mentioned came hundreds of years after the prophet. If you look at the big scholars at the time of the tabieen you will see they are actually atharis

    • @OCEAN-fc9wl
      @OCEAN-fc9wl Рік тому

      @@Harris19941 Hasan Al-Basri = Athari
      Ayub Al-Sakhtiyani = Athari
      Sufyan Al-Thawri = Athari
      Ibn Sirin = Athari
      Ibn Al-Mubarak = Athari
      Al-Shaybani = Athari
      Al-Awza'i = Athari
      Ibn Shihab Al-Zuhri = Athari
      Fudayl Ibn Iyad = Athari
      Al-Layth ibn Saʿd = Athari
      Yaḥyā ibn Maʻīn = Athari
      Sufyān ibn ʽUyaynah = Athari
      Ali ibn al-Madini = Athari
      Al-Tahawi = Athari
      Al-Barbahari = Athari
      Abu Hanifah (and his students) = Athari
      Malik Ibn Anas (and his students) = Athari
      Al-Shafi'i (and his students) = Athari
      Ahmed Ibn Hanbal (and his students) = Athari
      Ibn Abd Al-Barr = Athari
      Al-Tabari = Athari
      Al-Tabarani = Athari
      Ibn Khuzaymah = Athari
      Abu Dawud al-Sijistani = Athari
      Al-Baghawi = Athari
      Al-Bukhari = Athari
      Muslim = Athari
      Abu Dawud = Athari
      Al-Tirmidhi = Athari
      Al-Nasaa’i = Athari
      Ibn Majah = Athari
      Ibn Taymiyyah = Athari
      Ibn Kathir = Athari
      Ibn Al-Qayyim = Athari
      Al-Dhahabi = Athari
      Ibn Rajab = Athari
      Al-Mizzi = Athari
      Al-Shawkani = Athari
      Al-Sa'di = Athari
      And many more...

    • @Harris19941
      @Harris19941 Рік тому

      @@OCEAN-fc9wl okey so the scholars i mentioned didn't know what you know and were deviants?
      is that the argument here

  • @sofianee3580
    @sofianee3580 Рік тому +2

    Why is he talking about them alone ? 😅

    • @hl8302
      @hl8302 Рік тому +5

      Bcoz the last one used Taqiyah, lied, diverted and ducked all in about 10 mins

  • @elyamkhan6299
    @elyamkhan6299 Рік тому +4

    So, now the atheists has better Fitra than the Muslim Ashari

    • @batlefieldproes
      @batlefieldproes Рік тому +2

      are you shia ?

    • @elyamkhan6299
      @elyamkhan6299 Рік тому +1

      @@batlefieldproes
      You have a daughter for me ?

    • @batlefieldproes
      @batlefieldproes Рік тому

      not for Rafidah we not allowed to marry or pray behind shia@@elyamkhan6299

  • @MoeedKhan1979
    @MoeedKhan1979 Рік тому +7

    Ashari and maturidis are great muslims. Shamsi is wrong here

    • @hermithmza
      @hermithmza Рік тому +6

      Yea man people who leave the Sunnah are praiseworthy. Wallahi the “love” Muslims claim to have for Nabi Mustafa Alayhi Salaatu wa Salaam is so fake may Allah rectify us.

    • @MoeedKhan1979
      @MoeedKhan1979 Рік тому +1

      @@hermithmza salafi movement itself breaking into small groups. They act like khwarij which is very bad

    • @hermithmza
      @hermithmza Рік тому

      Attributing yourself to the Salaf as Salih is not a "movement" my brother, rather attributing yourself to Abu Hasan Al-Ashari (he made tawba and freed himself from these innnovated creeds in his works and stated he is on the creed of Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal may Allah be pleased with him) and Abu Mansur Al-Maturidi are. @@MoeedKhan1979

    • @TaherGat
      @TaherGat 7 місяців тому +4

      Whats your definition of great muslims if they dont affirm what Allah affirmed for himself

    • @HubaishHussain-ty6ek
      @HubaishHussain-ty6ek 6 місяців тому +1

      pfp checks out

  • @moonmoonStar
    @moonmoonStar Рік тому +2

    pity when muslims still listen to Shamsi when he has been debunked multiple times by Hijab and Ali Dawah on Sp-files channel. Credit given tohim in terms of dawah, but aqeedah ? Shamsi dont even have any credibility to talk whatsoever.

    • @s23r32
      @s23r32 Рік тому +3

      May Allah cure you from your Himaaqah. Imagine taking knowledge from Hijab, Ali, and SP Files (Hamid) who pretended to be a female Salafi extremist on Twitter to make Salafis look bad.

    • @moonmoonStar
      @moonmoonStar Рік тому

      @@s23r32 i dont take knowledge from wahabiyyah and definitely not from Shamsi when it's about aqeedah. He has no credibility to talk about aqeedah whatsoever.

    • @s23r32
      @s23r32 Рік тому +4

      @@moonmoonStar
      Allah’s name is الوهاب so what does “wahabiyyah” mean?

    • @peace-ym4st
      @peace-ym4st Рік тому

      Brother dnt follow someone blindly hijab and ali are doing gud job no dought but they lied about shamsi .shamsi is more knowledgable than hijab and ali regarding quran and sunnah

    • @moonmoonStar
      @moonmoonStar Рік тому

      @@s23r32 you know exactly what i meant. The follower of skewed aqeedah of Abdul Wahab Najd, thus Wahabiyyah who revives the aqeedah doctrine of Taymiyyah. A lot have been debunked regarding the Wahabiyyah proven never the same as the aqeedah of salafussoleh and i dont want to waste my time here. If you Wahabiyyah can labeled the aqeedah of Ahlussunnah Wal Jamaah as Ashari, i'll just do the same. *WAHABIYAH*

  • @Falamhi
    @Falamhi Рік тому +3

    Shamsi is a cheap ai bot 🤖

    • @batlefieldproes
      @batlefieldproes Рік тому +3

      shia mad again

    • @Falamhi
      @Falamhi Рік тому

      @@batlefieldproes
      Shia are also cheap ai bots 🤖

  • @sohailnazir3370
    @sohailnazir3370 Рік тому

    Speaking loud shouting screaming is not a definition of being a man it show u are unable to articulate yourself is sign of being afraid so u scream yell to distract the people away facts trying to stir people oh look at me cause I'm loud I'm right. Every discussion u want to dictate how it should flow and when u can't counter u start to interput and talk over them.

    • @hamzanocap
      @hamzanocap Рік тому

      Male yourself to Hyde Park and say this to his face. Ashari demonstrating their cowardice, look at how Allah has humiliated those who lie against Him.

  • @chandrababubabu8817
    @chandrababubabu8817 Рік тому

    THE CHRISTIAN FAITH, WORSHIP AND BIBILICAL CONCEPT OF TRINITY
    Christians are worshipping a Spiritual God in heaven, not a physical God.
    One and only God, who is Father [1 Corinthians 8:6], is existing in heaven as a “SPRIT” [John 4:24]. Before the world was created Word (Jesus) already existed, who was with God and was same as God (John 1:1). The Holy Spirit (Helper), who is also a “SPIRIT” (John 15:26), was too with God’s Spirit

    Then Word (Jesus) separated from God’s Spirit and by the Holy Spirit Word (Jesus) came to the world in flesh &blood in human form. Subsequent to crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, He ascended to heaven in “SPIRIT” [For Lord (Jesus Christ) is a “SPIRIT” (2Corinthians 3:17-18)] and merged with God’s Spirit and existing as one SPRIT, one God in heaven. For Lord Jesus Christ said “Father and I are one” (John10:30). And Word (Jesus) is same as God (John 1:1). Also, Jesus is a great God and Saviour (Titus 2:13). [These three are divine Spirits]
    [Note: As per Surah 4.171 Jesus was the word of God and was a Spirit proceeding from God. Further according to Surat az-Zukhruf 43:61 Jesus will be coming on the Judgement day. Also, Jesus did many miracles and wonders in the world ( Suras 3:49 and 5:110). So, Jesus Christ is heavenly divine and God].
    In view of the above scriptures “Father” or “Lord Jesus Christ” is ONE and the SAME God existing in heaven as one Spirit (John10:30).
    That is why Christians are worshipping Lord Jesus Christ, as Father and Jesus are ONE and the SAME in heaven (John10:30). Literally, people have been worshiping Jesus since the day when he was born [Ref: Mathew 2:11,Luke 24:52 , John 20:28,Matthew 28:9,17 and 1Corinthians 1:2 ] .
    In different names Lord Jesus Christ is called in the Bible such as “Word of God” “God” , “Lord” , “Son of God”, “Messiah”, “Saviour”, “Christ” , “Son of man” , “Jesus” and “Immanuel(God is with us) .
    The single spirit God in heaven pours down or sends on earth His own spirit (Romans 8:9&11, 1Corinthians 3:16) and “Lord’s or Jesus’s Spirit” (2Corinthians 3:17-18, Romans 8:9) and “Holy Spirit” (2Timothy 1:14), which are living with Christians (Three Spirits -Trinity). God’s Spirit or Lord’s Spirit joins with our spirit and make us Holy (Romans8:16, 1Corinthians 6:17). So, God is omnipresent (Jeremiah 23:23-24, Acts 17:24-28). [Note: God is having unlimited power who can send to earth innumerable number of His own spirit, Jesus’s Spirit and Holy Spirit. In the Bible we can see that God had sent Seven of His own Spirits to the Seven Churches at Asia (Revelation1:10)].
    When we praise and worship Jesus Christ in our churches, Holy Spirit fills the entire Church. Many have seen the Spirit of Jesus Christ, particularly now many in Iran.
    Without shedding blood of an innocent domestic animal there is no redemption of our Sin (Hebrews 9:22). So, Lord Jesus Christ came to the world as a Lamb (John 1:29) to sacrifice himself on the cross as an atonement for the forgiveness of Sin of mankind once and for all and save them from going to eternal fire of hell(1 Peter 3:18).

    During when Jesus was in this world in human form, Word (Jesus) detached from Father. That is why Jesus prayed to God like a human being and said only Father knew the day of Judgement. But he had immense power to perform miracles and wonders.
    Jesus said He was the way to eternal life (John14:6) and He had the authority to forgive sin (Mathew 9:6)
    Therefore, unbelievers come to Christ by repenting your past sins (Sins are: Idol worship , revenge, hatred, murder, adultery / sexual immorality, homosexual, divorce, marrying more than one wife, lust, greed, drunkenness, steal etc.etc..) and believe in Him. Then your past sins will be forgiven and will be born again by Baptism, and God’s spirit will join with your Spirit and will be saved. On the Judgement day our Spirit will go up with Jesus to heaven. [Note: After becoming Christians if you again make Sin, God’s spirit will leave you unless you repent of your sin and cry and pray to God for forgiveness].
    Those who are suffering from any sickness or chronic illness or sudden ailment, don’t worry, please pray to Jesus Christ, He can cure any complicated diseases, because Jesus Christ is the Divine Physician (Luke 4:40, Mark 1:34)