i believe it was around the 14:00 mark when you added the 6 in C6R6 when your mistake happened. this could have been an 8. everything else seemed good until then.
Thanks for posting! Enjoyed seeing your solve, appreciate your time & effort. Sticking with it can be hard and you always do it without much grief. Just a couple quick notes below. Your mistake point is noted at 14 minutes. I did ok. First run a sloppy 3’21. Posted a dash video of 2’18. And a guided tour… It’s a new 9x9! Starts with a r1 partial baseline and a given, hits a pocket corner, sweeps 3s across the south, then resolves half the south using tandem segments, hits another pocket corner, and resolves. Whew! -- your solve - 5:25 sweeping 3s after 3 → c3r7 keep sweeping 3s left to right 3 → c5r6 3 → c7r5 - 7:00 abandoned c9 after 6 → c9r8 c9 resolves - 11:30 c5 upper Is what you’re missing. 4 → c5r5 3 → c5r2 and the NW resolves - 14:05 c6 pigeonhole error This forced the restart. It is not a 6. Nothing else after this is valid until the restart. - restart - 18:17 (7:00) abandoned c9 after 6 → c9r8 c9 resolves - rest Honestly, you’re so flustered in the second part that you’re missing things that were easy the first attempt. No need to comment.
@@viperspec Me? I’m just a guy who knows how to solve One Up efficiently. Well, the guy most efficiently anyway. At the moment. Hmm. I single-handedly developed a segment-based solve style that’s much better than trying to force sudoku strategies into non-sudoku puzzles. Oh. I also champion focusing on the topography created by segmentation to expedite solutions. Baselines. Tandem segments. Pocket corners. Oh. I’ve also commented on like every One Up video Rangsk has posted in five months. That makes me Norm in this bar I suppose. Feel free to find my posts to learn more. FWIW, I didn’t criticize his posting of his mistake. I pointed out that he was flustered on the second solve and he didn’t need more criticism of that.
I had to restart this one too, I hit a row where I could not place a 4... then I made sure to work out not to duplicate that specific 4 and the rest fell into line. Mostly, I ignored 6,7,and8 until the end.
I solved it in 25:00, thanks for your perspective!
i believe it was around the 14:00 mark when you added the 6 in C6R6 when your mistake happened. this could have been an 8. everything else seemed good until then.
Thanks for posting! Enjoyed seeing your solve, appreciate your time & effort. Sticking with it can be hard and you always do it without much grief.
Just a couple quick notes below. Your mistake point is noted at 14 minutes.
I did ok. First run a sloppy 3’21. Posted a dash video of 2’18. And a guided tour…
It’s a new 9x9! Starts with a r1 partial baseline and a given, hits a pocket corner, sweeps 3s across the south, then resolves half the south using tandem segments, hits another pocket corner, and resolves. Whew!
-- your solve
- 5:25 sweeping 3s
after 3 → c3r7
keep sweeping 3s left to right
3 → c5r6
3 → c7r5
- 7:00 abandoned c9
after 6 → c9r8
c9 resolves
- 11:30 c5 upper
Is what you’re missing.
4 → c5r5
3 → c5r2
and the NW resolves
- 14:05 c6 pigeonhole error
This forced the restart. It is not a 6.
Nothing else after this is valid until the restart.
- restart
- 18:17 (7:00) abandoned c9
after 6 → c9r8
c9 resolves
- rest
Honestly, you’re so flustered in the second part that you’re missing things that were easy the first attempt. No need to comment.
Who is this guy? Like seeing that you post your mistakes and fix. Thanks for the informative puzzle solve; as always you teach as you play.
@@viperspec
Me?
I’m just a guy who knows how to solve One Up efficiently. Well, the guy most efficiently anyway. At the moment.
Hmm. I single-handedly developed a segment-based solve style that’s much better than trying to force sudoku strategies into non-sudoku puzzles. Oh. I also champion focusing on the topography created by segmentation to expedite solutions. Baselines. Tandem segments. Pocket corners.
Oh. I’ve also commented on like every One Up video Rangsk has posted in five months. That makes me Norm in this bar I suppose.
Feel free to find my posts to learn more.
FWIW, I didn’t criticize his posting of his mistake. I pointed out that he was flustered on the second solve and he didn’t need more criticism of that.
13:30. A pretty fast 9x9. Pleasantly surprising.
8:16 for me.
14:56 for me. Penciled a lot of the pairs and a couple of triples.
I had to restart this one too, I hit a row where I could not place a 4... then I made sure to work out not to duplicate that specific 4 and the rest fell into line. Mostly, I ignored 6,7,and8 until the end.
I quit this one 7 minutes in; it was too hard for me. Great solve!
Got half way in clean then had to Goodliffe the rest of the way. 24 minutes...
Kind comment 🤠