Play Enlisted for FREE on PC, Xbox Series X|S and PS5: playen.link/binkovsen Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now. See you in battle
Want to know who should play Enlisted? Everyone in your comment section!!... Because they are too scared to enlist in an actual military so they hide here just to cry and cope!🤣 I like your videos! Get your next video ready on how the Ukrainian southern bluff won them the northern Kharkiv!!
Politics is good vs bad to win over the nation Military is quality vs quantity to win over the battle theater so even with a higher quantity production can the quality match it’s limited counterparts as we see in Russia even the quality of soldiers matter more than the quantity take a look at Halo 5 Guardians, the 4 runners is what they call ‘em qualified Spartans vs a few thousand obviously outnumbered but the went through the whole game while probably millions have died by their hands. Just sayin quality not quantity. The quality of our 4th gen fighters vs 5th gen
The reckless optimists on this comment board creep me out--I hope they don't have any influence in the U.S. defense establishment. They rather remind me of those dolts who insisted it couldn't have been the Japanese who carried out that attack on Pearl Harbor, it must have been German pilots in those Japanese planes, and what about those cheap Japanese goods exported to the U.S. in the 20s and 30s? They were crap, so Japanese military equipment must be crap. The optimists were, of course, humiliated by actual events, and huge numbers of good people died because of it. Hope for the best, folks, but prepare for the worst.
Agree, but I will still mock the Chinese Arms just to annoy them. They're easily triggered and funny. But of course still prepare for the worse. Even quantity can outnumber the quality. Nazi Germany experienced it against the Soviet Union.
US doesn't produce the brain power to keep pace with future Chinese developments. Look at the universities, all foreigners in engineering, physics, chemistry advanced degree programs.
Reading some of these comments, I think it's dangerous to underestimate any opponent, especially when it comes to something as serious and deadly as war. Of course, the Russian military did not prove to be as... potent as many had thought and feared, but it's better to find out during the conflict that your opponent is weaker than you rather than just assuming so. Chinese fighter jets seem to be well-designed and on par with many Western jets. Even if they're slightly less capable than Western fighter aircraft, sufficient numbers may still be enough to keep up with their Western counterparts. I was China, I would not underestimate the US Air Force and if I was the USA, I would not underestimate the Chinese Air Force
I think that if China has a weakness, it would be the culture of corruption. Russia HAD a huge inventory of stuff, but corruption turned those stockpiles into liabilities. While I expect some of China's gear to be pretty decent, the big question is whether their logistics are in good health. Say, to ensure their amphibious troops can land on a certain piece of land without sinking midway, or finding their rifles firing blanks. If I were a member of USA's intelligence bloc, I would be keeping an eye on whether China is reforming their logistic chain to resist corruption. That would indicate whether China is serious about conquering Taiwan, or is just a papyrus tiger.
@@NoumenonAndPhenomenon Do you think China is completely ignoring what's going on in Ukraine. I'm sure they are studying it in great detail, and parades are not a sign of weakness. If that were the case we would have been considered weak if Trump had his way. Also the US's current military experiences are null and void because they were against an organized insurgence not a near peer military with modern technology.
@@giupetr968 Last time I argued with a Chinese guy who thought a single Liaoning carrier combat group could annihilate the entire Indian navy and air force.You two are just the same,purely brainles haters.
"Their premiere J-20 outdoing the F-22's peak production numbers" I'll be honest, given how limited the F-22's production numbers were, that isn't particularly impressive. If they can beat the F-16's production numbers, THEN I'll be impressed, because they crank those things out like crazy.
The problem is China's rather lacking industrial foundation, there are a lot of components that China either has difficulties making with a reasonable budget or simply cannot make themselves, and thus need to be imported, but these components are considered military grade hardware and can only be imported en mass from a handful of countries like Russia. Sometimes I wonder if Russia and China's combined can even keep up with this level of production rate. You can output J-20s and J-16s as fast as F-16s but it won't work if most of them cannot get their engines.
@@michaelwen5540 Yeah that's another thing. Building these jets is one thing. Keeping up the supplies of parts for maintenance and refit, especially when they have to be flying constantly to maintain pilot familiarity, is an entirely different beast, as Russia has demonstrated with the dismal performance of its air force against Ukraine.
@@michaelwen5540 Their "One Industry, One Enterprise" attempt at making mega-monopolies I think is their attempt at fixing this. But I expect it to go terribly bad for them since it doesn't fix the underlying reason they have so much money embezzled/improperly invested: relational corruption and failing upwards because said relational corruption. They are just going to make officials even more rich.
Very good coverage, and a lot of vital info and imagery here. Though one has to wonder what the PLA's Pilot numbers and training hours are like now. You can build all the Jets you want, but without sufficient Staff they're just gonna be grounded anyway.
PLA fighter pilots now get twice the amount of flying time than US fighter pilots, according to Gen Kenneth Wilsbach, Commander of the Pacific Air Forces.
@@archangel7052 From what I've heard many PLA pilots are still quite dissatisfied with how rigid and broken China's command structure is, allegedly they are seeing some improvements with this, still, China definitely has lots of growing pains to handle thanks to how, I guess, 'sedentary' they have been for a while.
@@jaek__ that was before the recent reforms. The golden helmet tournaments had pilots making up their own maneuvers to test against each other in a simulated environment.
Perun did A very technical video on the Chinese modernization, comparing budget, industry, and PPP of China, US and multiple other countries. It can be morning for some, but very detailed and insightful.
You're comparing production numbers from China, to USAF deliveries of planes. US is also producing way more F-35s for its allies, like japan (23+120 future), south korea (40) which the US would never go to war without. Yes china's numbers are quite impressive for just one country, but it's still nowhere near enough to match a realistic setting.
actually he's comparing the planes delivered to the chinese military to the planes delivered to the usa military. and the total numbers for each military. however many planes they sell to other countries is 100% irrelevant.
@@sabin97 Actually really not irrelevant, since the video literally has 'production rates' in the title. Why not compare production numbers? It's misleading in this instance. China nearly 100% produces for its own military, and then it's compared to delivery numbers of the US forces. I'm not trying to shill for the US & allies, I just think the basis of comparison for this video is flawed.
@@broworm1 oh yes. the title says "production rates" but the video is NOT about production rates, but about the rates of acquisition. yeah. the name doesnt make the thing. for example there's a country named the people's democratic republic of korea. it has "democratic" in the name. and yet it's not democratic. so yeah. the thing being compared in this video is the rate of acquisition of the chinese military vs the rate of acquisition of the usakistani military. that's why usakistan and china plane sales are not used. hopefully that cleared that up.
When Blinkov said China's expanding floor space he didn't give much context so it's understandable to not appreciating it's implications. To put things into perspective, almost all F-35s are currently assembled at the massive USAF Plant 4 in Fort Worth, Texas. At the same time, just the expansion at China's Chengdu plant over the last 4 years totalled the an area larger than the entire USAF Plant 4, you can see this cleary using Google Earth historical imagery. And that's in addition to the equally massive expansion at Shengyang. In other words, in the last 4 years China added 1.5x to 2x more fighter production capacity than the entire US F-35 production capacity, that's in addition to previous capacity, and those plants are just starting to ramp up. This is naval shipbuilding all over again, planes are harder to count than ships but even then this massive expansion is going to become very obvious in a few years.
A former US marine aviator was arrested and extradited to US for training PLA pilots in South Africa aviation schools, possibly facing decades behind bars.
Were you living under a rock when the CCP told everyone in China they were going to war with the US if Pelosi went to Taiwan? And when they fired all those missiles afterwards? What was happening then, were they fighting off an attack from the Dolphins? The CCP threatens more countries with violence than any other government on Earth, just because they are a paper tiger doesn't mean they aren't warmongers
@@ArmySigs ??? Were you living under the rock in the past 20 years? At least million dead already in middle east. And at least 14 million became refugees directly caused by US leveling the entire region.Not to mention Yemen, Chile, Cuba, and many other countries which suffered and continue to suffer either under direct Bombing, attempted coup d’état, or out right international blockade by US order. What? Threatening people is worse than literally killing millions now?
But does the U.S have an ongoing genocide in their borders though? Also, that's a false equivalency, the Middle Eastern conflicts the U.S waged are very different in justification and intentions than the conflict the Chinese keep boasting about starting and winning in Taiwan.
I remember back in 2006 when the F22 contract was cut way back. I was working for a defense subcontractor. We were deeply affected. The excuse was we had the F15 and no one had anything close and we would just never need a fighter like the F22 because no one would ever catch up to us as it was. I was shocked at the stupidity. That was exactly the attitude we had in the 1930s. We had the lead in aircraft technology. By WWII Europe and Japan had left us behind. I grew up listening to people who fought and lived through that war. We could have lost. It was dicey at best at the beginning. Many of the early battles could have gone the other way, and it would have been bad or worse for us. Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
pior to ww2, the US industrial capacity was nearly 10x of Japan, they just had a couple more rounds of practice before attacking the US. The US wouldn't lost that war either way. pior to ww2, japan did surprise attack to Qing dynasty and Russia, both were larger and stronger than Japan, however Japan won both by luck. That gave Japan so much confident, thought they could repeat the success.😂
Because the F22 combat range very short, only 800km, so it is useless except in european countries that US has a lot of allies. Air tank is not stealth, they can revealed the f22 very easy and f22 skin is outdated, it peels after several hours mission. Today technology, the stealth skin is direct painted. F22 is not in the competition, and i will say it is defect aircraft (except for balloon purpose)
As a Chinese, I can't say how good my country's fighter jets are, but I know that American fighter jets are good. Underestimating the enemy will always make you fail, so I believe that we Chinese people will strive to make our products better, rather than blindly belittle others.
Don’t worry. The West is just more experienced in dropping bombs and flying their planes over countries with no modern Air defence, Air Force, and radars. China is not very experienced but they do not have the mentality of underestimating competitors.
I'm not as modest as you, j20 is the best fighter in the world, f22 is not bad but at least not comparable to j20. It's just that the US controlled public opinion doesn't want to admit it. Look at this blogger's map of China and you'll know all about it.
@@dddddh1 lmao what? 5th gen fighters, all of them, haven’t had much of any real world testing. China’s has even less than the f22, so idk how you’re making such out of pocket claims. I mean, I know why you are, blind patriotism for the CCP. But kinda hard to be patriotic to a one party system that routinely kills civilians without a care in the world. And mind you, that sentiment is as true in the us as it is in China, so don’t even try and start doing typical Chinese finger pointing and deflection
Another great video Binkov. You know, the bean counting game has always fraught with pitfalls. I think it’s a great indicator of a country’s economic potency (ie: to just build) and to a lesser degree, a country’s future intent. I do think China will attain parity with the US in terms of yearly production, but I don’t think the US in the short or medium term is interested in keeping a production gap over China. Operative Challenge for the US is to replace that aging F15 fleet to the EX standards so they can get greater operability with the F-35s, so that it excels at what is what meant to do, which is relay battle space info to frontline assets. Whether the USAF is granted the budget to do that is well..up to congress. Operative challenge for China is based on whether their young indigenous platforms are a capable enough counter to US platforms in the region and whether whatever doctrine they pursue is successfully conducive to whatever their future intentions are in the region.
@@giupetr968 What years do you live in? China is the second country to sent missions on mars.... and the only country that built an entire space station alone.
The only fighter jets in China’s Airforce that are modern in terms of avionics, electronics, and radar are the J-20, J-16, and J-10C. The J-11D and FC-31 haven’t yet been procured, but I think they’re pretty modern too in terms of avionics, electronics, and radar. I think there’s about 500-550 of the J-20, J-16, and J-10C aircraft. Definitely lower than 600, which is about 50-100 more aircraft than this time last year.
@@kurousagi8155 nope. Well J15 is a Chinese evolution of the SU33 and the J11 of the SU27. So in a way you can say that the J15 is the navy version of the J11.
@@marinuslubbe3993 well wait a minute. The J-15 is not an evolution of the SU-33. The J-15 is based off the T-10K-3, which was an incomplete prototype of the SU-33. Since 2018, Chinese state media has discussed the capability of the J-15 and it has been described as disappointing.
@@kurousagi8155 That's correct, but in the grand scheme of things you could call it a SU33 derivative. The J15 is not very good it's true and that's why they are modernizing them with the J15B variant. Aesa radar, PL10/15 capable, more powerful engines etc. It's designed to operate from catobar carriers.
@@ferrous3262 they don't even have water, their economy is in the tanks, their housing is in shambles, their dams are falling apart, their banks won't allow people to take out money, they are lo king down cities of 50 plus million. wtf are you talking about Chinese bot.
China finally has the resources and know-how to mass produce J-20s and seeks to standardize the PLAAF inventory, as the majority are J-10s or older planes. Air power is probably the weakest link of the PLA, right behind the PLAN's ability to wage expeditionary warfare or stage amphibious landings
You have to admit China is advancing very fast. You just have to look at what China was like 20 years ago and it's night and day. This is what the containing strategy is all about.
@@Death-fw6co russia is not the USSR, it lacks the manpower, industrial capability and money. China on the otherhand doesn't have a shortage in those areas.
@awesome guy China moved most of their low end manufacturing in AESAN while keeping the more profitable ones like cars, drones, industrial machinery. 5G is Chinese, 60% of Tesla battery is also by Chinese tech. Westerners are really still living in the 90s
West keep on saying that Chinese are of lower quality, meanwhile they forgot that during WW2 germany had better quality equipments but Allies beat them in quantity. Quantity have it's own quality.
Not really. Better off having quality, easier logistics , pilots more likely to survive = more experienced. Better tech , warfare haa changed since WW2
Why do you think allies have low quality weaponry!? They have most reliable weaponry than German have I know German have superior engineering but it's doesn't mean allies have sh!ty weapons like Chinese have If fact it's like super quality vs high quality Where Chinese is low quality
it should not come as a surprise if the US is having problems in the procurement of military equipments. It is beset by corruptions and cronyism. It is a fact that The US pays $90,000 for small steel bushings (10-20 bushings in all) in a small ziploc bag. Thus, I can't imagine how ridicolously inflated the prices of bigger and more complex items are.
From what I’ve heard that’s because the price is inflated to hide hidden programs and prototypes etc they don’t want other people to know about. Most likely it’s that and also corruption.
I'm Chinese and we'd love to be looked down upon by others, in fact, it would be nice if they treated the gear we made as rubbish. - "Sun Tzu On The Art of War"
GREETINNGS from MExico we go through same Humiliation!! except they STOLE on may 13TH 1846 more Half our Territory Texas California New Mexico and Arizona the Empire of pure EVIl and Racists!!
idiots think 1 stealth fighter = another stealth fighter. The F35 is not the fastest or most manoeuvrable fighter, but its software and the situational awareness it provides the pilot, it absolutely thrashes everything out there
Ssssssssh. Quiet. If China gets overconfident with their planes they actually might launch a war and we get to see fifth generation fighters in action against other fifth generation fighters
@@bluemarlin8138 it’s larger because J-35 has a longer range, which is essential for carrier fighters. F-35c must make compromise with army and especially marine variants and so was more limited in several parameters, range being one of them. Come on, Chinese AESA radar already moved onto GaN and was miniaturized onto CWIS while America is still struggling to roll out their GaM AESA radar on naval ships, not to mention on their CWIS. Out of all gaps that exist between China and America, electronics is one of the smallest ones and turbine engine is one of the largest.
Overconfidence is a flimsy shield. If push comes to shove, i'd be very wary about the enemy's capabilities regardless of their reputation. Especially since all this is theoretical, last thing you need is to build an ego around it and be shocked when you're proven wrong when a conflict arises to put those theories to the test. If it were me, i'd be constantly be trying to improve and upgrade the F-22 and F-35s on the assumption that the enemy is vastly superior. Strength wanes and stagnates when you think you're at the top.
@john lee America has oil, and the military capability to cut off china's oil supply. It also has the allies of the Saudis to agree to any oil-sanctions that they see fit. Remember, the only reason why OPEC still exists to this day and hadn't been conquered by Iraq and some other unfriendly neighbors in the area is because America has military agreements with Saudi Arabia. In a nutshell: Saudi Arabia: Hi America, we'll give you first dibs on our oil, and you give us military protection from our enemies America: Consider it Done.
@john lee be civilized and use english. even though i CAN read farmer (nong min hua) i am not going to lower myself to such a level. You're obviously a mainlander and uncivilized. If Emperor Qin saw you writing Chinese like that he wouldn't have thought twice about halving you executed on the spot. If you MUST use Chinese Langauge because you're so uneducated you can't read and write in English on a primarily ENGLISH language thread....be slightly civilized and use traditional form chinese (Fan Ti Zi)
Its better to let those make fun keep on make fun. To let enemy lose is to let them making the same mistakes and not correct them. The pride and ego is their downfall. In this case, let them keep making fun and look down on china, so their downfall becomes twice the fall.
Really. The U.S. and China are not natural enemies. They shouldn't fight. But let the people of Tiawan be free, like the Uyghur, in Xinjiang, the far northwest of China.
@@Saleemsan most of the post modern war are not about enemies. Its all about money conflict. Some believe both can win win in money, some believe one will win while the other will lose in money.
I think that some people don't understand what a war between China and the US would entail. The two biggest economic superpowers and the 2 most advanced and powerful military powers going to war would not be like the Gulf War or the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, virtually everyone would be effected. China has the economic influence and financial assets to send the whole world into an economic crisis, fuel shortages, food shortages, the hundreds of billions of dollars that they invest around the world each year, the collapse of the tourist industry that relies on the millions of Chinese tourists spending billions, the shops would be empty, the prices of anything that was available would skyrocket, the international stock markets would collapse, raw materials and manufactured goods would be hard to get, inflation, mass unemployment, etc etc. Those would be the economic consequences. Then the military consequences would be hard to comprehend, they have the technology, industrial capabilities and the raw materials and assets needed to fight a prolonged war, they have a huge navy, airforce and land force, backed up by nuclear weapons and paramilitary forces. Actually defeating China in their own region would not be guaranteed by any means and a definite victory over China would be almost impossible in my opinion. So before anyone gets angry because their country is going to have to accept that China and the rest of the world has the same rights to succeed as the western world, its much better to have a prosperous China, creating wealth by trading with the world, than trying to provoke an unwinnable war with a economic and military superpower.
Although China has the right to succeed economically the western world isn’t going to sit by and allow them to do it through unfair business practices. Such as undercutting western competition by subsidizing its companies so they can sell their products cheaper and theft of intellectual property so less money is spent on research and development. This second point extends to the Chinese military. They are always one generation of weapons behind the US. By the time they get their hands on US weapons designs and start processing those platforms the US is already in the process of developing and producing the next generation. If China and the US go to war they both will lose along with the rest of the world. One can only pray such a conflict would stay conventional. For the US it will mean a heavily depleted military and a nation that will take several decades to rebuild. For China it will likely be a total collapse of the CCP and an even longer recovery period than the US. No one wins.
@@TheGersh18 I don't agree that Chinese military technology is a generation behind the western world. The PLA has hypersonic missiles, anti ballistic missile missiles, rail guns, stealth fighters (2 different aircraft), laser technology, anti satellite weaponry, etc. The quality of the hardware is no longer inferior either, even the US military intelligence services consider the latest military equipment to be 'world class' (according to the US Naval Intelligence Office).
@@TheGersh18 you know what, my answer was chopped off,There is a force in this world that doesn't allow us to tell the truth ,think about it. Please do more research and observation.
You can build hundreds of basketball courts, but don't expect the new players on those courts to be able to compete with NBA pros. You need lots of training and flight hours to have a chance against pilots who have that already. Numbers help, but won't save you.
ofcourse they're going to train new pilots for the planes dumbass. who said their fleet's gonna be built overnight anyway? it'll take years or even decades for china to match usaf plane numbers and pilot skills. but being ignorant and inhaling copium by saying shit like that will only allow china to creep and match usa's power. this is why the main takeaway from the video is that the us should up their production and training too if they dont want to be matched by china in the future.
@@lumberjackagies5158 that was a much, much simpler time. Very limited instruments, basic weaponry, and line of sight combat. Not at all a good comparison.
Note binkov specifically saying "Stealthy J-20", not Steath J-20. We know they are more stealthy then the garbage Felon, but they are still nowhere near the RCS of the F-35/F-22
Actually, all "stealth" aircrafts are stealthy because there is no such thing as complete stealth. And we dont know what the RCS on the J20 really is, im sure the Chinese aircraft designers know a lot more than armchair engineers. :)
@@realdreamerschangetheworld7470 how could one ignore this huge cultural phenomenon that is penetrating ALL the levels of western societies? It wants to change the reality, humanity and world as we know it! You can't learn about our age, if you ignore one such an massive phenomenon. The phenomenon that is an indirect (still big) reason for the downfall of US in relation to China.
@@realdreamerschangetheworld7470 also name a one instance in history, where "out of sight, out of mind" mindset in the face of a problem has solved it.
So what your saying is they are building maybe 20-30 airframes a year and they are 1200 planes behind? The math says 40 years just to catch up. Plus total aircraft production in the US is 180-220 airframes a year for all customers. No one is buying Chinese fighters. Not sure what J-10 and J-15 (40 airframes or 1/3 of their production) will do against Gen 5 airframes. The jury is still out on the J-20. Looks to me the US still has quality/quantity/knowledge/ force multipliers/Stealth/Allies and overall command and control.
"US still has quality/quantity/knowledge/ force multipliers/Stealth/Allies and overall command and control." 🤣🤣🤣 Tell me more about USA superiority when USA recapture Afghan. Can?
@@BabaYaga826 yeah cuz Afghanistan isn’t begging the world for help right now. So strong they can defeat the USA, but too incompetent to feed their own people or educate their women. Countries around the world buy the latest and greatest equipment and technology from Afghanistan and send their soldiers there to be trained in a superior way of fighting - oh wait no one does that. Seems like you don’t understand the difference between a military defeat and a political one.
Don't forget about other things aside from number of jets, that is pilots level of training, knowledge and experience also aircrafts maintenance and spare parts availability, quality and production
people seem to think its the gun and not the mind behind that trigger that makes a difference i been saying the same thing you just said and plus we have way more battle field IQ and experience then what we get credit for
@@androidx99 Dude, it's like the bottom-ranked healthcare amongst developed countries, and that's in virtually every study done. The only countries that have worse healthcare are developing countries.
"China is now buying more combat jets than the US" Well, when you're still using 3rd generation Mig-21 derivatives despite being the 2nd best Air Force around, you really need to buy a lot of replacement aircrafts.
@@khangkt1721 Conrad sock puppet here always ignores worse economics geography and real numbers and whenever Sock puppet make comparisons subsequently apparently it always involves never never looking at nato.
Russia is fighting in Ukraine.... Which USA is finding with hundreds of billions of dollars. Full scale war might go nuclear. But a Proxy war seems to be acceptable.
Binkov instead of blurring , you can use AI image fill in tool. where you completely cut out the blurred area than the image is "fixed" . It looks way better
I don't, way way too expensive in my opinion, and at this point, the avionics really are questionable. The F-22 needs a overhaul in its capabilities, something akin to the F-35 and it's sensor fusion, and of course a HMCS.
@@jaek__ You know thay aircraft avionics are continuously updated right? Also find a fighter pilot that would choose Fat Amy over the Raptor for air to air engagement. The Raptor is a better air superiority fighter in every way. Which is not a knock on your precious F-35. The Raptor was the replacement for the F-15C the F-35 was the replacement for the F-16 and F-18. Yes they were hoping to get the A-10 gone as well and I think the F-15E. But really the F-16 dose all that anyway. Point is the F-35 can do air to air. The Raptor was built for air to air. And since a real shooting war with China looks more and more likely. And they have fith gens too it would be really really nice to have those Raptors right about now. I suspect this fight will happen long before NGAD if it happens at all.
@@sasquatchycowboy5585 Yes, you would be somewhat correct in that avionics are updated and maintained, but unlike the F-35 the software and sensor enhancements are not nearly at the level they should be, the venerable performance of the F-22 is nothing to scoff at sure, but when I say overhaul I mean overhaul, and that's not a knock at your precious F-22, frankly, she is aging, and needs a makeover, which is, to my knowledge, is what the USAF is looking to do, if you really want a specialized air superiority fighter than you need to ensure that your aircraft is up to date with current iterations of enhancements in all aspects. Besides, it's not like China is fighting us in a complete vacuum, they have to deal with India, Japan, and SK if all out war breaks out, and to my mind, the number of Raptors the USAF has isn't going to be relevant, so long as they are up-to-date. Especially with the sheer numbers of F-35s we will have by then, along with advancements in missile technology.
@@sasquatchycowboy5585 China isn't ready, don't get fooled, by the time China is up to the task, Japan will be as well, and even other Oceanic countries. If China does manage to beat everyone, they earned it to be honest, but somehow I doubt they will
@@mrmacias4217 lmao they are using Russian designs, they still suck. Eastern bloc jet engines have always been underpowered compared to western designs.
@@socaljet *hmm I think it is more like comparing a Land Cruiser to a GM or comparing a C919 to 737 Max Dive Bomber* *Or even better yet search video for coin stand on a train traveling 350KM/H* *I really really doubt his baseless claim "Chinese plane have less capablilty than the American ones" 🤭 but his videos have tendency of trashing everything Chinese have or does tho look at his videos several years back*
the problem with the Chinese airforce in the past is the bottle neck in engine tech. China still had to import engines from Russia, that's why the Chinese airforce development is slower than the navy. But the Chinese solved the engine problem, the domestic engine is ready, and that's why the airforce development is on steroid now.
The US is building over 150 f-35 per year and climbing. As mentioned these aren't all going too the US, but to other NATO countries as well. However, there aircraft are going to close US allies, they can absolutely not be discounted when comparing the US to china because unlike china, the US prefers to spread its culture, economic prosperity, and form of government around to make very close allies as its prefered form of imperialism, while china just invades other countries and then say "oh they were always part of china, we're not imperialist unlike the US haha" (ask a Tibetaan, or a Mongolian, or hong kong, or Taiwanese citizen if you think china Isn't imperialist lmao). compared to 40 J-20 per year and increasing? not quite sure the US is really being out-built here
@@marinuslubbe3993 oh I'm not saying they don't, I very much aknowlege their imperialism. They just try negotiations and cultural appropriation and financial aid fist and with pretty decent success. But they do have and constantly use that massive MIC too Saying the US doesn't invade countries would be utterly fucking retarded People just hold china to a different standard, because: 1 they say they don't invade countries and try to censor anyone that says otherwise. Despite the Sino-vietnam war being more recent and equally disastrous as the Vietnam war everyone knows (Vietnam beating off both the US and China is pretty funny, cope and seethe superpowers) 2: the invasion of Tibet 3: their constant clashes with India 4: their debt traps 5: their naval territorial claims, that are wildly out of proportion with those of any other nation on earth and violently clash with at least 3 other countries with completely normal territorial water claims 6: Taiwan
China has done very little invading, it maybe purely because they haven't been strong enough, but don't say bollocks like China invades and the US doesn't when if anything the opposite is true.
China obviously watch how F-18 perform and found ways to counter..or else why they go ahead and make more. US data is on the table, China's data is hidden
5% of the u.s economy is in defense. The u.s economy would literally collapse if they didnt cause conflict around the world. But keep talking shit about a country thats never invaded anyone while the other...
@@rh906 While the growth is slowing, it is still growing, that's the exact opposite of collapse instead of throwing some chinese crap you could open a dictionary once in a while, it would save you from looking like an idiot
@@wolftone4818 *Looks at the popped Real Estate market being ~30% China's GDP, local governments only make money from "selling" land, and people stopping paying into the ponzi scheme making other parts of the economy starting to crumble helped with the lockdowns.* *Looks away.*
In every Binkov video we see China is getting stronger and stronger at a rapid paste, and in every video there is a group of saIty arm chair experts. 😂
"uh guys i swear the nation that has a third of its GDP taken up by shell construction companies and got fucked up by vietnam harder than the US can imagine and also is a super corrupt export economy with mass internal dissent is super strong guys we need to be super worried guys"
Don't worry. China is weak and can't win. Everything cheap and breaks. underestimate China. Nothing to worry about. USA №1. USA have superweapon never seen. China don't know how to fight war. China only copy. EZ win.
Well uh... I remember that analysts tend to look for signs in production when it comes to preparation for war. This kind of sounds like they're gearing up for it.
please keep in mind that a lot of their older planes are becoming increasingly obsolete. So production is likely from replacements and not preparation for a massive war.
They already have an operational prototype. Europe says they're gonna have a prototype for theirs in 9 years. So china is still 5 years behind those. It takes time to make cheap counterfeits of other countries intellectual properties.
China is producing around 20 stealth fighters each year, while the US is building 150 F35 each year, and the US is building F18, F15, and F16 with record breaking production rate in the near future. So, no, China hasn't came near to the US production, let alone catching up the fleet sizes.
@@CircusJeanie2399 because the data in the video are false. Especially after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a lot of Chinese aviation parts came from Ukraine and Russia, Chinese fighter jets production will be significantly delayed. The video significantly overstated the Chinese production while underestimated the US expansions in fighter production.
"a lot Of Chinese aviation parts came from Russian and Ukraine". So you are basically living in the 2000s?The only part came from Russia and Ukraine was aeroengine,and even that ended in 2018,when China started to produce domestic ws engines.
China's previously limited production capacity was due to barriers in sourcing advanced engines. Now that WS-10 is fully mature and ready for mass production, China is able to scale up plane production by double or even triple the initial rate.
@Brent Reid I don't know about three fold crashes, but there has been an uptick in crashes. Flight training hours have more than doubled in the past 10 years for PLAAF combat pilots. The type of training conducted also changed from simple flight training to more dangerous and complex combat maneuvers involving multiple units and plane types. Unless you're implying something else?
I think it's relevant to consider that the J-20 is more on par with the F-35, being a multi-role, BVR focused 'fighter', and not a stealthy air-superiority dog-fighter like the F-22 is. China still has nothing close to the F-22, and is likely also a generation if not more behind in air-superiority tactics and institutional knowledge.
Jesus sometimes people like you make me speechless, you watch military channels all the time you still don't know J-20 is NOT a multirole fighter? It only got one role that's sniping high value aircrafts with long range missiles, it's like the most basic knowledge it renders everything else you say pointless.
Some comments make me grin because it shows the people who made them have no idea what China was like 45 years and how far it has come. If it continues at the same rate of scientific and technological progress it will easily overcome the USA by 2049.
A man living in the walls passing by.....the wards you said are unreasonable and ridiculous，which shows you never fully understand this place.This junk you are watching on this video can't threat anyone.Because it is the product of political operation, not military.
Yeah that was the thing about the whole "World's largest air force" trope that China was always supposed to have had for a long time. Having planes doesn't mean having them operational.
@@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr yeah that too! My point was that "we" barely made any f22s so it's not an accomplishment to have more of something that we do f22s. Lol. What was it like 160 or 190?basically 1 years worth of production of f35s. But yeah I don't think we have to be airframe geniuses to see that a f22 would easily own j20s. I still think there is alot of the Russia thing going on here too with most of the Chinese stuff. It sounds great... Like what they tell the world and the little we see... But it probably all sucks beyond our wildest imaginations. Lol
Its relevant to consider that while the jets are being produced en-masse. It doesnt translate to true force projection. They're still far behind in both numbers and quality of air power. And sea power vessels are laughable in capability. Its not really relevant since its not like the US wants to fight china, we know we'd win conventional conflicts just from the sheer difference in levels of actual combat capability in our force structures. That doesnt mean to say China doesnt have quality forces or capability, but its been well proven what we can do and what chinese forces can do. Now in a couple decades or more that could be very different. But technology is rapidly taking over in many areas so its almost pointless to speculate. The standards of "force projection" may very well be talking about entirely different parameters like Drones and AI and other weapon systems and not the traditional ones we think of right now. Satelites, Drones, biological weapons and other tech will be the weapons of true comparison in future years in my opinion.
Another thing. While war simulation games are fun. Lets keep in mind that we shouldnt WANT to be adversaries without an actual reason. So far China has not taken military action on Taiwan and hopefully that remains true. Or on India or Japan. As long as they do not strike against allies, there is still room and time to repair any damaged relations. This of course could be implausible, but its better than senseless War that no one wants.
Im half chinese, but i kinda want to see the us be more powerful lol. Whether what you say is true or not, the fact is… china is catching up. Which is scary.
@@Ahhh1 The unfortunate truth is that the US will not remain where we are at depending on what tech is introduced in the future. My timetable is a very hazardous guestimate since we dont actually know what the US government has in the "back room" so to speak. And the same is true for china and russia. I'm assuming (with what we do know) that we will have the edge and advantage with military experience and power for many years. But traditional forces that we excel in will not be as important as drones and AI become more advanced along with new ways to project force through internet and satelite advances. Even our sea based advantages which we have almost exclusive control over wont remain that way for long as weapons become smaller - but more powerful in unmanned capacities. The truth is that the US needs help in the future. And if peace is to prevail, it is without a doubt going to have to be joint efforts to deter strong powers from pushing their weight on weaker countries without total war. The days of US supremacy are going away. The days of any single country having global dominance are probably done. We had a good run but times change and the best we can do is recognize the US absolute power is not going to remain. And to adapt to what the world will be like and hopefully set the stage for a more peaceful coexistence as society (hopefully) progresses to more intelligence and reason.
@@zoka7108 I might have exaggerated a bit. But in comparison to what US ships are capable of (not even counting the Aircraft carrier fleets) it is not in China's favor by even the most generous estimates.
According to a recent report by ASPI on Critical Technology Tracker, China is now the world leader in 37 of the 44 separate sectors of technological development and research in the world, and is second place in many others. This is something to consider when it comes to which side has the technological edge. The US is rapidly losing its advantage in technology to China. Another thing to remember is just how powerful the Chinese economy now is, its already $19 trillion per year, and growing around 5/6% each year (they add the equivalent of the whole Italian economy to their own GDP each year). They have massive industrial capabilities and a lot of money to spend on defence, their defence spending is much lower percentage wise of their GDP than the US and less than most European countries, yet they are able to spend $250+ billion dollars on military equipment and defence per year, which means that they could easily ramp up the percentage of defence expenditure quickly.
@@BROCKUPPERCUTIn fact, no country in the world can produce chips alone, including the United States, but recently China HUAWEI collected parts have been all domestic, including chips, look at the information, do not live in the information cocoon created by the West
Think the US has about or over 1000 F-16 Vipers as well.... might be a bit dated but that jet still puts in work and is still the most cost effective option. #JakeHunter88
@@ZZZ2573 Do you even know what makes a plane six generation? I'll give you a hint it must have all the previous generational attributes and that's a start. 6th gen will even make the F-22 obsolete soon.
China is building these not even knowing if there actually good. While US are making newer and better ones , Also the US 6th gen fighter is coming soon.
The US hasn't fought a near peer since World War 2. How in the hell can you tell if their equipment can hang with anything more advanced than a MiG-21 or MANPADS on camel back?
Eh bring it on . The Russian s400 was supposed to be able to take out HIMARS missiles but we know how that turned out. I have a feeling the J-20 will meet a similar fate
things are always different in practice. the main issue for both of them is practice / experience, because that will help them learn. otherwise they get to do so the hard way.
Don't worry. China is weak and can't win. Everything cheap and breaks. underestimate China. Nothing to worry about. USA №1. USA have superweapon never seen. China don't know how to fight war. China only copy. EZ win.
@@BabaYaga826 bruh their economy is in strain these days....you wouldn't know about it anyways. Chinese economy is in strain and on the brink of collapse due to excessive e-state costs and a good amount of spending going to shitty projects like high speed rails. High speed rails in china costed upto 3 trillion dollars in gold and magnets while it has only been able to cover up a fraction of that value at 37p billion dollars. Their investments are being banned all over from sri lanka, turkey russia india brazil and south africa. If this isn't signs of economic crash then idk what is.
@@AdityaSingh-fy5vv every year some new causes is cited for Chinese economy crumbling. In 1993 it was “Japanese Korean economies both collapsed and Chinese economy index is worse than them”, in 2008 it was “even American economy collapsed, Chinese economy will surely collapse”, now it’s “real estate bubble collapsed in China so Chinese economy must collapse”. If you look hard, you will find economic shockwaves every year. I guess some people will just use these as justification for something they believe will happen.
@@AdityaSingh-fy5vv LMAO another China Uncensored bannon simp? bruh Chinese economy are collapsing over 30 years in the mainstream media, it's literally call sustainable collapse, also US spend even more money than china did in infrastructure projects on the war on terror aka war on brown people
@@thomaszhang3101 nah bruh...this time it's real....do you rlly believe that china will outlive us or india for that matter? Cuz they have no stability, their govt is hated, and taiwan. Just taiwan. Us declared it would defend taiwan from pla. So it's kinda in a bad spot. And everywhere china has a bad name so it wouldn't be a superpower.
Exactly, don't worry my western friends, as you can see it's made in China, probably can't fly for long. You can't sleep well if you worry over nothing. So please assume they don't exist. 😘
@@andrewmckenzie292 This is just an aviation model. China can't make this at all. It's just a large model that can fly. In Asia, only South Korea and India have the ability to independently develop fighter jets. Even Japan has given up research and development, but South Korea and India's fighter jets have already appeared. You won't understand that South Korea is the first in the world, South Korea is a developed country, and India is only the second,this is the consensus of asians
Play Enlisted for FREE on PC, Xbox Series X|S and PS5: playen.link/binkovsen Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now. See you in battle
You should really take 10 seconds to learn about geography and Geo location
China's military is the cheap knockoff of the Russian military. I don't expect much from them 🥱
Want to know who should play Enlisted? Everyone in your comment section!!... Because they are too scared to enlist in an actual military so they hide here just to cry and cope!🤣 I like your videos! Get your next video ready on how the Ukrainian southern bluff won them the northern Kharkiv!!
Politics is good vs bad to win over the nation Military is quality vs quantity to win over the battle theater so even with a higher quantity production can the quality match it’s limited counterparts as we see in Russia even the quality of soldiers matter more than the quantity take a look at Halo 5 Guardians, the 4 runners is what they call ‘em qualified Spartans vs a few thousand obviously outnumbered but the went through the whole game while probably millions have died by their hands. Just sayin quality not quantity. The quality of our 4th gen fighters vs 5th gen
Even if it isn’t the most cost effective I would still like to see 1000 f-22 in our arsenal
All of this wouldn’t happened if steiner had conducted his counter attack
The numbers mason
@@Loubie2005 WhAt Do ThEy MeAn?!?!
Alternatively if Fegelein had been present ^^
Lmfao
@@ItsCarl94 nein
The reckless optimists on this comment board creep me out--I hope they don't have any influence in the U.S. defense establishment. They rather remind me of those dolts who insisted it couldn't have been the Japanese who carried out that attack on Pearl Harbor, it must have been German pilots in those Japanese planes, and what about those cheap Japanese goods exported to the U.S. in the 20s and 30s? They were crap, so Japanese military equipment must be crap. The optimists were, of course, humiliated by actual events, and huge numbers of good people died because of it. Hope for the best, folks, but prepare for the worst.
Agree, but I will still mock the Chinese Arms just to annoy them. They're easily triggered and funny. But of course still prepare for the worse. Even quantity can outnumber the quality. Nazi Germany experienced it against the Soviet Union.
US doesn't produce the brain power to keep pace with future Chinese developments. Look at the universities, all foreigners in engineering, physics, chemistry advanced degree programs.
Yeah I hear the Chinese are going to take over San Francisco chop suey shops. Horror, the horror.
Reading some of these comments, I think it's dangerous to underestimate any opponent, especially when it comes to something as serious and deadly as war. Of course, the Russian military did not prove to be as... potent as many had thought and feared, but it's better to find out during the conflict that your opponent is weaker than you rather than just assuming so. Chinese fighter jets seem to be well-designed and on par with many Western jets. Even if they're slightly less capable than Western fighter aircraft, sufficient numbers may still be enough to keep up with their Western counterparts. I was China, I would not underestimate the US Air Force and if I was the USA, I would not underestimate the Chinese Air Force
I think it's important to pay attention to anyone, but chinese tech is not so good. Poor and low quality.
I think that if China has a weakness, it would be the culture of corruption. Russia HAD a huge inventory of stuff, but corruption turned those stockpiles into liabilities. While I expect some of China's gear to be pretty decent, the big question is whether their logistics are in good health. Say, to ensure their amphibious troops can land on a certain piece of land without sinking midway, or finding their rifles firing blanks.
If I were a member of USA's intelligence bloc, I would be keeping an eye on whether China is reforming their logistic chain to resist corruption. That would indicate whether China is serious about conquering Taiwan, or is just a papyrus tiger.
@@NoumenonAndPhenomenon Do you think China is completely ignoring what's going on in Ukraine. I'm sure they are studying it in great detail, and parades are not a sign of weakness. If that were the case we would have been considered weak if Trump had his way. Also the US's current military experiences are null and void because they were against an organized insurgence not a near peer military with modern technology.
ua-cam.com/video/fxXuBmlD8cI/v-deo.html
@@giupetr968 Last time I argued with a Chinese guy who thought a single Liaoning carrier combat group could annihilate the entire Indian navy and air force.You two are just the same,purely brainles haters.
"Their premiere J-20 outdoing the F-22's peak production numbers"
I'll be honest, given how limited the F-22's production numbers were, that isn't particularly impressive.
If they can beat the F-16's production numbers, THEN I'll be impressed, because they crank those things out like crazy.
The problem is China's rather lacking industrial foundation, there are a lot of components that China either has difficulties making with a reasonable budget or simply cannot make themselves, and thus need to be imported, but these components are considered military grade hardware and can only be imported en mass from a handful of countries like Russia. Sometimes I wonder if Russia and China's combined can even keep up with this level of production rate. You can output J-20s and J-16s as fast as F-16s but it won't work if most of them cannot get their engines.
@@michaelwen5540 Yeah that's another thing. Building these jets is one thing. Keeping up the supplies of parts for maintenance and refit, especially when they have to be flying constantly to maintain pilot familiarity, is an entirely different beast, as Russia has demonstrated with the dismal performance of its air force against Ukraine.
Dude the f-16 has been built since the late 80S 💀
A better comparison would be the F-35, and the US is still producing a shit ton of those.
@@michaelwen5540 Their "One Industry, One Enterprise" attempt at making mega-monopolies I think is their attempt at fixing this. But I expect it to go terribly bad for them since it doesn't fix the underlying reason they have so much money embezzled/improperly invested: relational corruption and failing upwards because said relational corruption. They are just going to make officials even more rich.
Very good coverage, and a lot of vital info and imagery here. Though one has to wonder what the PLA's Pilot numbers and training hours are like now. You can build all the Jets you want, but without sufficient Staff they're just gonna be grounded anyway.
PLA fighter pilots now get twice the amount of flying time than US fighter pilots, according to Gen Kenneth Wilsbach, Commander of the Pacific Air Forces.
@@archangel7052 From what I've heard many PLA pilots are still quite dissatisfied with how rigid and broken China's command structure is, allegedly they are seeing some improvements with this, still, China definitely has lots of growing pains to handle thanks to how, I guess, 'sedentary' they have been for a while.
I too would like to see numbers and information on PLAAF and PLAN pilot training regimens.
Stick time is one of the true indicators of performance
@@jaek__ that was before the recent reforms. The golden helmet tournaments had pilots making up their own maneuvers to test against each other in a simulated environment.
@@LOL-zu1zr Can you link this?
Also would like to see any stuff regarding their BVR tests and capabilities, would be an interesting read.
Perun did A very technical video on the Chinese modernization, comparing budget, industry, and PPP of China, US and multiple other countries. It can be morning for some, but very detailed and insightful.
You're comparing production numbers from China, to USAF deliveries of planes. US is also producing way more F-35s for its allies, like japan (23+120 future), south korea (40) which the US would never go to war without.
Yes china's numbers are quite impressive for just one country, but it's still nowhere near enough to match a realistic setting.
actually he's comparing the planes delivered to the chinese military to the planes delivered to the usa military.
and the total numbers for each military.
however many planes they sell to other countries is 100% irrelevant.
@@sabin97 Actually really not irrelevant, since the video literally has 'production rates' in the title. Why not compare production numbers? It's misleading in this instance. China nearly 100% produces for its own military, and then it's compared to delivery numbers of the US forces.
I'm not trying to shill for the US & allies, I just think the basis of comparison for this video is flawed.
@@broworm1
oh yes. the title says "production rates" but the video is NOT about production rates, but about the rates of acquisition.
yeah. the name doesnt make the thing.
for example there's a country named the people's democratic republic of korea.
it has "democratic" in the name. and yet it's not democratic.
so yeah. the thing being compared in this video is the rate of acquisition of the chinese military vs the rate of acquisition of the usakistani military.
that's why usakistan and china plane sales are not used.
hopefully that cleared that up.
When Blinkov said China's expanding floor space he didn't give much context so it's understandable to not appreciating it's implications.
To put things into perspective, almost all F-35s are currently assembled at the massive USAF Plant 4 in Fort Worth, Texas.
At the same time, just the expansion at China's Chengdu plant over the last 4 years totalled the an area larger than the entire USAF Plant 4, you can see this cleary using Google Earth historical imagery.
And that's in addition to the equally massive expansion at Shengyang.
In other words, in the last 4 years China added 1.5x to 2x more fighter production capacity than the entire US F-35 production capacity, that's in addition to previous capacity, and those plants are just starting to ramp up.
This is naval shipbuilding all over again, planes are harder to count than ships but even then this massive expansion is going to become very obvious in a few years.
No offense but yes I would rather have the U.S quality made jets rather than a quantity of Tofu fighter jets.
A former US marine aviator was arrested and extradited to US for training PLA pilots in South Africa aviation schools, possibly facing decades behind bars.
Comments: China is a warmongering nation
Also comments: China has no war experience in 40 years
I can’t anymore😂
Them keyboard warriors🤣🤣🤣
Were you living under a rock when the CCP told everyone in China they were going to war with the US if Pelosi went to Taiwan? And when they fired all those missiles afterwards? What was happening then, were they fighting off an attack from the Dolphins? The CCP threatens more countries with violence than any other government on Earth, just because they are a paper tiger doesn't mean they aren't warmongers
@@ArmySigs ??? Were you living under the rock in the past 20 years? At least million dead already in middle east. And at least 14 million became refugees directly caused by US leveling the entire region.Not to mention Yemen, Chile, Cuba, and many other countries which suffered and continue to suffer either under direct Bombing, attempted coup d’état, or out right international blockade by US order.
What? Threatening people is worse than literally killing millions now?
Those are not mutually exclusive
But does the U.S have an ongoing genocide in their borders though? Also, that's a false equivalency, the Middle Eastern conflicts the U.S waged are very different in justification and intentions than the conflict the Chinese keep boasting about starting and winning in Taiwan.
The comment section is going to be filled with upset Americans and Chinese bots. And both will try to justify their presence.
And what about mein soldiers?
Sadly, the reality. The American conservatives and the Chinese nationalists.
@@tengkualiff sorry bro.. comparing the two is not only irresponsible its just dumb
@@tengkualiff tbf the Chinese Air Force is still running mostly ancient MiG-21 variants. They’re screwed.
What's your excuse for commenting?
I remember back in 2006 when the F22 contract was cut way back. I was working for a defense subcontractor. We were deeply affected. The excuse was we had the F15 and no one had anything close and we would just never need a fighter like the F22 because no one would ever catch up to us as it was. I was shocked at the stupidity. That was exactly the attitude we had in the 1930s. We had the lead in aircraft technology. By WWII Europe and Japan had left us behind. I grew up listening to people who fought and lived through that war. We could have lost. It was dicey at best at the beginning. Many of the early battles could have gone the other way, and it would have been bad or worse for us. Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
pior to ww2, the US industrial capacity was nearly 10x of Japan, they just had a couple more rounds of practice before attacking the US. The US wouldn't lost that war either way.
pior to ww2, japan did surprise attack to Qing dynasty and Russia, both were larger and stronger than Japan, however Japan won both by luck. That gave Japan so much confident, thought they could repeat the success.😂
Because the F22 combat range very short, only 800km, so it is useless except in european countries that US has a lot of allies.
Air tank is not stealth, they can revealed the f22 very easy and f22 skin is outdated, it peels after several hours mission.
Today technology, the stealth skin is direct painted.
F22 is not in the competition, and i will say it is defect aircraft (except for balloon purpose)
in 2006 uncle Sam is busy killing iraqy and afgan people. no money for fighter
@@creatormaxi8324 Also, every stealth aircraft has to be designed around the limitations of it being a steath aircraft
As a Chinese, I can't say how good my country's fighter jets are, but I know that American fighter jets are good. Underestimating the enemy will always make you fail, so I believe that we Chinese people will strive to make our products better, rather than blindly belittle others.
Bravo China!
Don’t worry. The West is just more experienced in dropping bombs and flying their planes over countries with no modern Air defence, Air Force, and radars. China is not very experienced but they do not have the mentality of underestimating competitors.
@@f9658 lmfao another copy paste comment?? Let the grown ups talk, tiny dunce
I'm not as modest as you, j20 is the best fighter in the world, f22 is not bad but at least not comparable to j20. It's just that the US controlled public opinion doesn't want to admit it. Look at this blogger's map of China and you'll know all about it.
@@dddddh1 lmao what? 5th gen fighters, all of them, haven’t had much of any real world testing. China’s has even less than the f22, so idk how you’re making such out of pocket claims. I mean, I know why you are, blind patriotism for the CCP. But kinda hard to be patriotic to a one party system that routinely kills civilians without a care in the world. And mind you, that sentiment is as true in the us as it is in China, so don’t even try and start doing typical Chinese finger pointing and deflection
The comment section is cursed
Yeah so toxic
Not as cursed as communist BRAINWASHED 🤪 China and VODKA 🥴 Russia 😆🤣
Yankee bots vs CCP bots
Another great video Binkov. You know, the bean counting game has always fraught with pitfalls. I think it’s a great indicator of a country’s economic potency (ie: to just build) and to a lesser degree, a country’s future intent. I do think China will attain parity with the US in terms of yearly production, but I don’t think the US in the short or medium term is interested in keeping a production gap over China. Operative Challenge for the US is to replace that aging F15 fleet to the EX standards so they can get greater operability with the F-35s, so that it excels at what is what meant to do, which is relay battle space info to frontline assets. Whether the USAF is granted the budget to do that is well..up to congress. Operative challenge for China is based on whether their young indigenous platforms are a capable enough counter to US platforms in the region and whether whatever doctrine they pursue is successfully conducive to whatever their future intentions are in the region.
Lots of cope in these comments. China is getting strong, and quickly. We need to accept and address it.
Just numbers, no quality
@@giupetr968 What years do you live in? China is the second country to sent missions on mars.... and the only country that built an entire space station alone.
its not cope, its a note for us to get stronger lmao
if theyre getting stronger, so should we
its should be a constant
How’s their economy going?
@@giupetr968 the j-16 and j-20 are probably very capable fighters. The j-20 is probably the 3rd most potent fighter in the world (after f-22 and f-35)
Bro even Lockheed Martin is watching this video 😂😂
Yep. And giggling their @$$3$ off. China's a joke.
The only fighter jets in China’s Airforce that are modern in terms of avionics, electronics, and radar are the J-20, J-16, and J-10C. The J-11D and FC-31 haven’t yet been procured, but I think they’re pretty modern too in terms of avionics, electronics, and radar.
I think there’s about 500-550 of the J-20, J-16, and J-10C aircraft. Definitely lower than 600, which is about 50-100 more aircraft than this time last year.
J-15B and J-11BH are also modern. J11D isn't a think anymore, it was scraped. The J11B will be upgraded to J11BH.
@@marinuslubbe3993 J-15? Thought the Chinese gave up on it and made naval versions J-10s and J-11s.
@@kurousagi8155 nope. Well J15 is a Chinese evolution of the SU33 and the J11 of the SU27. So in a way you can say that the J15 is the navy version of the J11.
@@marinuslubbe3993 well wait a minute. The J-15 is not an evolution of the SU-33. The J-15 is based off the T-10K-3, which was an incomplete prototype of the SU-33. Since 2018, Chinese state media has discussed the capability of the J-15 and it has been described as disappointing.
@@kurousagi8155 That's correct, but in the grand scheme of things you could call it a SU33 derivative. The J15 is not very good it's true and that's why they are modernizing them with the J15B variant. Aesa radar, PL10/15 capable, more powerful engines etc. It's designed to operate from catobar carriers.
IF they are building planes like they put buildings together......it is not a big deal. Chinese navy does not have range.
Just in time for the NGAD and B21 Raider....
China is going to have a rude awakening with how much maintenance costs they are going to have to pay.
they have alot of money not that big of a deal
@@ferrous3262 they don't even have water, their economy is in the tanks, their housing is in shambles, their dams are falling apart, their banks won't allow people to take out money, they are lo king down cities of 50 plus million. wtf are you talking about Chinese bot.
This comment is saltier than the Atlantic Ocean lol. xD
The corruption tax and low part lifespans are gonna be fun.
@Saint FluffySnow false. Their money is just worth a lot more in their country than the US. It's the result of the US having a more mature economy
cant wait to see all the youtube armchair generals and military specialist come out
China finally has the resources and know-how to mass produce J-20s and seeks to standardize the PLAAF inventory, as the majority are J-10s or older planes.
Air power is probably the weakest link of the PLA, right behind the PLAN's ability to wage expeditionary warfare or stage amphibious landings
There are many models of J10, just like the US also has F16A/B...
China is definitely quantity over quality
I doubt that can be told for military equipments being sold for Chinese own military.
Made in china equipment without seeing combat
Seen how that worked out with Russia lol. Just a few American trucks with missiles folded them
You have to admit China is advancing very fast. You just have to look at what China was like 20 years ago and it's night and day. This is what the containing strategy is all about.
@@Death-fw6co russia is not the USSR, it lacks the manpower, industrial capability and money. China on the otherhand doesn't have a shortage in those areas.
Amazing review and visuals 👌🏻
So many coping westerners who still live in the 90s
@awesome guy China moved most of their low end manufacturing in AESAN while keeping the more profitable ones like cars, drones, industrial machinery. 5G is Chinese, 60% of Tesla battery is also by Chinese tech. Westerners are really still living in the 90s
West keep on saying that Chinese are of lower quality, meanwhile they forgot that during WW2 germany had better quality equipments but Allies beat them in quantity. Quantity have it's own quality.
well the US has way too many F35 so they are the ones winning in quantity. China needs decades of time to surpass that.
If it were only a few comments it would be reasonable, but now they're just smoking that copium
Not really. Better off having quality, easier logistics , pilots more likely to survive = more experienced. Better tech , warfare haa changed since WW2
Ok, you can fly 4 J-10s with PL-8 and I'll fly an F-35 with 4 AIM-120D in internal bay.
Why do you think allies have low quality weaponry!?
They have most reliable weaponry than German have
I know German have superior engineering but it's doesn't mean allies have sh!ty weapons like Chinese have
If fact it's like super quality vs high quality
Where Chinese is low quality
They can buy and produce all the Lego jets they want
LEGO f_35 fail 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ginoomarramirezolivera470 f35 is mutch better keep crying little boiiiii
@@cortney3280 Beter i'n crash🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ginoomarramirezolivera470 but 8 j20 crashed do to trchincalnfaliturs only 4 f35 crash and there are way more f35 then j20 soooo
@@cortney3280 🤣🤣🤣🤣f_35 fail y shit , j_20 crash ??? Is drunk 🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡
I remember when we talked about Russia this way.
Ikr. If china is supposed to be inferior with Russia, I don’t see the problem here.
china's economy is more than 10X of russia's and china is by far the biggest producer of all kinds of products in the world.
Remember when we thought America was a superpower
@@mrmacias4217 lol mmmkay
Ah yes the J20, the dollar store version of the F-22....
lmao
The great value of 5th gen
Bad ass plane bro
Such good 💯
Daewoo j20
What’s your source for this info? I don’t see any in the description
China could be pulling a fast one with production numbers like the Russians did with their Aircraft Carriers.
This is true. I have been hearing a lot more jets crossing since August. I'm in Chengdu
it should not come as a surprise if the US is having problems in the procurement of military equipments. It is beset by corruptions and cronyism. It is a fact that The US pays $90,000 for small steel bushings (10-20 bushings in all) in a small ziploc bag. Thus, I can't imagine how ridicolously inflated the prices of bigger and more complex items are.
From what I’ve heard that’s because the price is inflated to hide hidden programs and prototypes etc they don’t want other people to know about. Most likely it’s that and also corruption.
I'm Chinese and we'd love to be looked down upon by others, in fact, it would be nice if they treated the gear we made as rubbish. - "Sun Tzu On The Art of War"
GREETINNGS from MExico we go through same Humiliation!! except they STOLE on may 13TH 1846 more Half our Territory Texas California New Mexico and Arizona the Empire of pure EVIl and Racists!!
"Wait I didn't say any of that" - Sun Tzu on the Art of War
Can you use UA-cam?
@@Madokaexe why not?
@@Madokaexe 🧠？😂
idiots think 1 stealth fighter = another stealth fighter. The F35 is not the fastest or most manoeuvrable fighter, but its software and the situational awareness it provides the pilot, it absolutely thrashes everything out there
Ssssssssh. Quiet. If China gets overconfident with their planes they actually might launch a war and we get to see fifth generation fighters in action against other fifth generation fighters
Exactly. The US military is a system, every single part communicates and coordinate as one unit. That includes personnel and equipments.
把敵人當白癡的時候 殊不知你跟他的差距越來越小
Interesting how China's J-35 not only looks very much like the F-35, but even has a similar name.
But eh, must be a coincidence.
It’s done so to piss people like you off. But in all seriousness J-35 is quite a lot larger than F35.
Wasn't J-35 coined by observers?
@@WSOJ3 It’s bigger because China is behind in engine tech and miniaturization of electronics.
@@bluemarlin8138 carries larger missiles
@@bluemarlin8138 it’s larger because J-35 has a longer range, which is essential for carrier fighters. F-35c must make compromise with army and especially marine variants and so was more limited in several parameters, range being one of them.
Come on, Chinese AESA radar already moved onto GaN and was miniaturized onto CWIS while America is still struggling to roll out their GaM AESA radar on naval ships, not to mention on their CWIS.
Out of all gaps that exist between China and America, electronics is one of the smallest ones and turbine engine is one of the largest.
Overconfidence is a flimsy shield. If push comes to shove, i'd be very wary about the enemy's capabilities regardless of their reputation. Especially since all this is theoretical, last thing you need is to build an ego around it and be shocked when you're proven wrong when a conflict arises to put those theories to the test. If it were me, i'd be constantly be trying to improve and upgrade the F-22 and F-35s on the assumption that the enemy is vastly superior. Strength wanes and stagnates when you think you're at the top.
There's already a 6th generation fighter lol.
Upgrading the F-22? What are you? Insane? Much cheaper to build the NGAD,
they are constantly upgraded....
@john lee America has oil, and the military capability to cut off china's oil supply. It also has the allies of the Saudis to agree to any oil-sanctions that they see fit.
Remember, the only reason why OPEC still exists to this day and hadn't been conquered by Iraq and some other unfriendly neighbors in the area is because America has military agreements with Saudi Arabia.
In a nutshell:
Saudi Arabia: Hi America, we'll give you first dibs on our oil, and you give us military protection from our enemies
America: Consider it Done.
@john lee be civilized and use english. even though i CAN read farmer (nong min hua) i am not going to lower myself to such a level.
You're obviously a mainlander and uncivilized. If Emperor Qin saw you writing Chinese like that he wouldn't have thought twice about halving you executed on the spot.
If you MUST use Chinese Langauge because you're so uneducated you can't read and write in English on a primarily ENGLISH language thread....be slightly civilized and use traditional form chinese (Fan Ti Zi)
To be honest anyone make fun of other militaries, only shows that you lack military knowledge.
And it's a childish behavior.
Agreed 👍
Its better to let those make fun keep on make fun. To let enemy lose is to let them making the same mistakes and not correct them. The pride and ego is their downfall. In this case, let them keep making fun and look down on china, so their downfall becomes twice the fall.
Really. The U.S. and China are not natural enemies. They shouldn't fight. But let the people of Tiawan be free, like the Uyghur, in Xinjiang, the far northwest of China.
@@Saleemsan most of the post modern war are not about enemies. Its all about money conflict. Some believe both can win win in money, some believe one will win while the other will lose in money.
I think that some people don't understand what a war between China and the US would entail.
The two biggest economic superpowers and the 2 most advanced and powerful military powers going to war would not be like the Gulf War or the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, virtually everyone would be effected.
China has the economic influence and financial assets to send the whole world into an economic crisis, fuel shortages, food shortages, the hundreds of billions of dollars that they invest around the world each year, the collapse of the tourist industry that relies on the millions of Chinese tourists spending billions, the shops would be empty, the prices of anything that was available would skyrocket, the international stock markets would collapse, raw materials and manufactured goods would be hard to get, inflation, mass unemployment, etc etc. Those would be the economic consequences.
Then the military consequences would be hard to comprehend, they have the technology, industrial capabilities and the raw materials and assets needed to fight a prolonged war, they have a huge navy, airforce and land force, backed up by nuclear weapons and paramilitary forces.
Actually defeating China in their own region would not be guaranteed by any means and a definite victory over China would be almost impossible in my opinion.
So before anyone gets angry because their country is going to have to accept that China and the rest of the world has the same rights to succeed as the western world, its much better to have a prosperous China, creating wealth by trading with the world, than trying to provoke an unwinnable war with a economic and military superpower.
Although China has the right to succeed economically the western world isn’t going to sit by and allow them to do it through unfair business practices. Such as undercutting western competition by subsidizing its companies so they can sell their products cheaper and theft of intellectual property so less money is spent on research and development. This second point extends to the Chinese military. They are always one generation of weapons behind the US. By the time they get their hands on US weapons designs and start processing those platforms the US is already in the process of developing and producing the next generation. If China and the US go to war they both will lose along with the rest of the world. One can only pray such a conflict would stay conventional. For the US it will mean a heavily depleted military and a nation that will take several decades to rebuild. For China it will likely be a total collapse of the CCP and an even longer recovery period than the US. No one wins.
@@TheGersh18 nice contributor of western media ， come work for the BBC tomorrow morning.
@@TheGersh18 I don't agree that Chinese military technology is a generation behind the western world.
The PLA has hypersonic missiles, anti ballistic missile missiles, rail guns, stealth fighters (2 different aircraft), laser technology, anti satellite weaponry, etc. The quality of the hardware is no longer inferior either, even the US military intelligence services consider the latest military equipment to be 'world class' (according to the US Naval Intelligence Office).
@@magicyang8594 what did you find inaccurate in my statement?
@@TheGersh18 you know what, my answer was chopped off,There is a force in this world that doesn't allow us to tell the truth ,think about it. Please do more research and observation.
Mad Indian bro noises 😚
😂seriously whenever anyone mentions china whole sca#mmers show uo
Indian enjoy democrasy and freedom unlike Chinese who are slaves of CCP 😂
You can build hundreds of basketball courts, but don't expect the new players on those courts to be able to compete with NBA pros. You need lots of training and flight hours to have a chance against pilots who have that already. Numbers help, but won't save you.
ofcourse they're going to train new pilots for the planes dumbass. who said their fleet's gonna be built overnight anyway? it'll take years or even decades for china to match usaf plane numbers and pilot skills. but being ignorant and inhaling copium by saying shit like that will only allow china to creep and match usa's power. this is why the main takeaway from the video is that the us should up their production and training too if they dont want to be matched by china in the future.
US was considered inexperienced in WW2. People learn on the job. Some of the best soldiers in world wars were farmers and school teachers
@@lumberjackagies5158 that was a much, much simpler time. Very limited instruments, basic weaponry, and line of sight combat. Not at all a good comparison.
NBA pros barely win Olympic gold
so no basketball court should be built?
Note binkov specifically saying "Stealthy J-20", not Steath J-20. We know they are more stealthy then the garbage Felon, but they are still nowhere near the RCS of the F-35/F-22
Range, payload, flight ceiling, top speed...
Lots of reasons why the F35 is less stealthy than the F22
Actually, all "stealth" aircrafts are stealthy because there is no such thing as complete stealth. And we dont know what the RCS on the J20 really is, im sure the Chinese aircraft designers know a lot more than armchair engineers. :)
@Saint FluffySnow hey China is failing troll
@Saint FluffySnow how much are they paying you?
@@boeing-lt4el About $0.50/post.
Guess now we know how Germany and Japan felt in wwII.
US also has Emma
Please leave the wokeism and counter-wokeism politics at the door please. We’re here to learn, not lose braincells.
LOL it's that one gay girl 'from' the us army
Yeah. The they/them army is still better than any other country. Just because you hate gay people doesn’t mean they can’t do their job.
@@realdreamerschangetheworld7470 how could one ignore this huge cultural phenomenon that is penetrating ALL the levels of western societies? It wants to change the reality, humanity and world as we know it!
You can't learn about our age, if you ignore one such an massive phenomenon. The phenomenon that is an indirect (still big) reason for the downfall of US in relation to China.
@@realdreamerschangetheworld7470 also name a one instance in history, where "out of sight, out of mind" mindset in the face of a problem has solved it.
So what your saying is they are building maybe 20-30 airframes a year and they are 1200 planes behind? The math says 40 years just to catch up.
Plus total aircraft production in the US is 180-220 airframes a year for all customers. No one is buying Chinese fighters.
Not sure what J-10 and J-15 (40 airframes or 1/3 of their production) will do against Gen 5 airframes. The jury is still out on the J-20.
Looks to me the US still has quality/quantity/knowledge/ force multipliers/Stealth/Allies and overall command and control.
Shhhhhh we need to catastrophize to get a bigger military budget.
"US still has quality/quantity/knowledge/ force multipliers/Stealth/Allies and overall command and control." 🤣🤣🤣 Tell me more about USA superiority when USA recapture Afghan. Can?
@@BabaYaga826 yeah cuz Afghanistan isn’t begging the world for help right now. So strong they can defeat the USA, but too incompetent to feed their own people or educate their women. Countries around the world buy the latest and greatest equipment and technology from Afghanistan and send their soldiers there to be trained in a superior way of fighting - oh wait no one does that. Seems like you don’t understand the difference between a military defeat and a political one.
Why do Americans think the Chinese are trying to compete with them 🤦🏾♂️
@@veerchand2129 Anyone talking about political issue in here? 🤣🤣🤣
as the saying goes..If you want peace , prepare for war. Even Henry Kissinger advised China to be prepared for war.
Don't forget about other things aside from number of jets, that is pilots level of training, knowledge and experience also aircrafts maintenance and spare parts availability, quality and production
people seem to think its the gun and not the mind behind that trigger that makes a difference i been saying the same thing you just said and plus we have way more battle field IQ and experience then what we get credit for
The only thing that slows the Raptor against any Chinese aircraft is landing to rearm.
Having to fly 4000 miles through a dozen refuels back to the nearest surviving base will certainly slow things down.
and the build quality will be SHOCKING
The USA has stealth aircraft and no healthcare 😂
Europe has healthcare but no army.
We have healthcare...... it just cost as much as a fighter jet haha, still the best available Healthcare in the world baby
Umm... USA healthcare is world class?
@@androidx99 Dude, it's like the bottom-ranked healthcare amongst developed countries, and that's in virtually every study done. The only countries that have worse healthcare are developing countries.
@@dextercochran4916 Certainly not by outcomes. If you have unlimited money, sure
Great video, thanks for the data.
More doesn't seem to be better
"China is now buying more combat jets than the US"
Well, when you're still using 3rd generation Mig-21 derivatives despite being the 2nd best Air Force around, you really need to buy a lot of replacement aircrafts.
Technically, the United States Navy is the 2nd best air force in the world right after the United States Air Force
@@khangkt1721 Conrad sock puppet here always ignores worse economics geography and real numbers and whenever Sock puppet make comparisons subsequently apparently it always involves never never looking at nato.
@@khangkt1721 I know, but Binkov included the acquisition of US Navy's acquisition of Super Bugs and F-35Cs to US' overall fighter acquisition.
an american crying because another nation surpasses his nation
@@margarettoellieniellieni5087 must you obsess?
All I can say is WW3 is going to be interesting if it ever come to a full scale war.
It will go nuclear very quickly
@@martinjrgensen8234 which is exactly why it wont ever happen
Russia is fighting in Ukraine.... Which USA is finding with hundreds of billions of dollars.
Full scale war might go nuclear. But a Proxy war seems to be acceptable.
Guess the Chinese have been watching the grimreaper squadrons simulations.
Binkov instead of blurring , you can use AI image fill in tool.
where you completely cut out the blurred area than the image is "fixed" .
It looks way better
God i really wish we had finished the production of the Raptor.
I don't, way way too expensive in my opinion, and at this point, the avionics really are questionable.
The F-22 needs a overhaul in its capabilities, something akin to the F-35 and it's sensor fusion, and of course a HMCS.
@@jaek__ You know thay aircraft avionics are continuously updated right? Also find a fighter pilot that would choose Fat Amy over the Raptor for air to air engagement. The Raptor is a better air superiority fighter in every way. Which is not a knock on your precious F-35. The Raptor was the replacement for the F-15C the F-35 was the replacement for the F-16 and F-18. Yes they were hoping to get the A-10 gone as well and I think the F-15E. But really the F-16 dose all that anyway. Point is the F-35 can do air to air. The Raptor was built for air to air. And since a real shooting war with China looks more and more likely. And they have fith gens too it would be really really nice to have those Raptors right about now. I suspect this fight will happen long before NGAD if it happens at all.
@@sasquatchycowboy5585 Yes, you would be somewhat correct in that avionics are updated and maintained, but unlike the F-35 the software and sensor enhancements are not nearly at the level they should be, the venerable performance of the F-22 is nothing to scoff at sure, but when I say overhaul I mean overhaul, and that's not a knock at your precious F-22, frankly, she is aging, and needs a makeover, which is, to my knowledge, is what the USAF is looking to do, if you really want a specialized air superiority fighter than you need to ensure that your aircraft is up to date with current iterations of enhancements in all aspects.
Besides, it's not like China is fighting us in a complete vacuum, they have to deal with India, Japan, and SK if all out war breaks out, and to my mind, the number of Raptors the USAF has isn't going to be relevant, so long as they are up-to-date.
Especially with the sheer numbers of F-35s we will have by then, along with advancements in missile technology.
@@sasquatchycowboy5585 China isn't ready, don't get fooled, by the time China is up to the task, Japan will be as well, and even other Oceanic countries.
If China does manage to beat everyone, they earned it to be honest, but somehow I doubt they will
Airframed are easy. Where China is lacking is building powerful and reliable jet engines.
That’s why Russia exist
@@mrmacias4217 lmao they are using Russian designs, they still suck.
Eastern bloc jet engines have always been underpowered compared to western designs.
@@mrmacias4217 Soon to stop existing.
True China is definitely lagging behind in jet Engine technology while it took the west over 7 decades to get to this current level
A lot of people are going think we still produce F22...We don't any more.
By the time China and Russia have proper 5th gen stealth fighters in service, USA will already have a 6th gen stealth fighter.
The capabilities gap has shrunk considerably and it could continue to shrink or possibly invert in the future.
And? China will still overtake the US
Just like when the Zumwalt was supposed to leapfrog China too right 😂😂😂
@@justbecause3187 they can’t even build proper engine for the J20. Future? Yes, probably 50 years.
genrations arent that big of a deal mig17 were shooting down 3rd gen aircraft over vietnam
Why do half the comments make no sense? Like literal gibberish…
As long as the Chinese planes don't suffer from the same quality issues as their buildings then they are good.
Corny
Bamboo sticks for wing braces😂
@@mrmacias4217 they call the buildings in china "tofu dregs" because they just fall apart
@@socaljet *hmm I think it is more like comparing a Land Cruiser to a GM or comparing a C919 to 737 Max Dive Bomber*
*Or even better yet search video for coin stand on a train traveling 350KM/H*
*I really really doubt his baseless claim "Chinese plane have less capablilty than the American ones" 🤭 but his videos have tendency of trashing everything Chinese have or does tho look at his videos several years back*
It's only some of their buildings. Which would be the ones made by corrupt companies tied to powerful local and regional officials, who... oh......
two months later, the Zhuhai air show tells you, those numbers are still underestimated the reality
the problem with the Chinese airforce in the past is the bottle neck in engine tech. China still had to import engines from Russia, that's why the Chinese airforce development is slower than the navy. But the Chinese solved the engine problem, the domestic engine is ready, and that's why the airforce development is on steroid now.
the "domestic" engine is probably stolen :D
And even their Navy is not impressive. It doesn't have the range to do anything significant beyond looking scary and maybe coastal defense.
It’s a win win Russia gets money China gets better technology I don’t see your point?
The US is building over 150 f-35 per year and climbing. As mentioned these aren't all going too the US, but to other NATO countries as well. However, there aircraft are going to close US allies, they can absolutely not be discounted when comparing the US to china because unlike china, the US prefers to spread its culture, economic prosperity, and form of government around to make very close allies as its prefered form of imperialism, while china just invades other countries and then say "oh they were always part of china, we're not imperialist unlike the US haha" (ask a Tibetaan, or a Mongolian, or hong kong, or Taiwanese citizen if you think china Isn't imperialist lmao).
compared to 40 J-20 per year and increasing?
not quite sure the US is really being out-built here
The US doesn't invade other coutnries ? Are you guys saying shit like this without bursting out laughing?
@@marinuslubbe3993 shh, you might overload his circuits
@@marinuslubbe3993 oh I'm not saying they don't, I very much aknowlege their imperialism. They just try negotiations and cultural appropriation and financial aid fist and with pretty decent success. But they do have and constantly use that massive MIC too
Saying the US doesn't invade countries would be utterly fucking retarded
People just hold china to a different standard, because:
1 they say they don't invade countries and try to censor anyone that says otherwise. Despite the Sino-vietnam war being more recent and equally disastrous as the Vietnam war everyone knows (Vietnam beating off both the US and China is pretty funny, cope and seethe superpowers)
2: the invasion of Tibet
3: their constant clashes with India
4: their debt traps
5: their naval territorial claims, that are wildly out of proportion with those of any other nation on earth and violently clash with at least 3 other countries with completely normal territorial water claims
6: Taiwan
@@marinuslubbe3993 invade means you attack and put your own flag on it
China has done very little invading, it maybe purely because they haven't been strong enough, but don't say bollocks like China invades and the US doesn't when if anything the opposite is true.
I'd bet the F18 is more capable than the J16. No one really know how the J16s will perform.
China obviously watch how F-18 perform and found ways to counter..or else why they go ahead and make more.
US data is on the table, China's data is hidden
Probably like the Russian counterpart that use cheap gps that were used in taxis 10 years ago
J-16 is very similar to su-35
Their numbers don’t matter if they don’t know how to logistically support them at war
人不犯我，我不犯人，人若犯我，我必犯人
If that's the case, Xi is in trouble
They got to stimulate that collapsing economy some how.
Collapsing? where? their GDP keeps growing
do you even fact check?
5% of the u.s economy is in defense. The u.s economy would literally collapse if they didnt cause conflict around the world. But keep talking shit about a country thats never invaded anyone while the other...
@@nadarith1044
Which has been sharply declining. But here, for your troubles.
*throws a 伍角*
Good person.
@@rh906 While the growth is slowing, it is still growing, that's the exact opposite of collapse
instead of throwing some chinese crap you could open a dictionary once in a while, it would save you from looking like an idiot
@@wolftone4818 *Looks at the popped Real Estate market being ~30% China's GDP, local governments only make money from "selling" land, and people stopping paying into the ponzi scheme making other parts of the economy starting to crumble helped with the lockdowns.*
*Looks away.*
In every Binkov video we see China is getting stronger and stronger at a rapid paste, and in every video there is a group of saIty arm chair experts. 😂
"uh guys i swear the nation that has a third of its GDP taken up by shell construction companies and got fucked up by vietnam harder than the US can imagine and also is a super corrupt export economy with mass internal dissent is super strong guys we need to be super worried guys"
And in everyone there are Chinese and Russian accounts talking sh**. It’s honestly entertaining 😂.
Don't worry. China is weak and can't win. Everything cheap and breaks. underestimate China. Nothing to worry about. USA №1. USA have superweapon never seen. China don't know how to fight war. China only copy. EZ win.
@@HARMstudio6 Funny and ironic that u said that cuz its mostly from people not wanting to believe the fact that China is getting stronger.
@@zszs100 sometimes that’s true but most videos it’s a few very loud CCP enthusiasts making completely wild claims.
Surprised to see an Enlisted sponsor. Normally, it would’ve been War Thunder.
Well uh... I remember that analysts tend to look for signs in production when it comes to preparation for war. This kind of sounds like they're gearing up for it.
Except that their defence budget is still below 2% of GDP - which is typically what most advanced economies spend on defence.
please keep in mind that a lot of their older planes are becoming increasingly obsolete. So production is likely from replacements and not preparation for a massive war.
@@kenjisasuke7705 you need to watch Perun’s video…
If the US wants to keep pace they better hustle on the sixth GEN programs.
It's took 25 more years
They already have an operational prototype.
Europe says they're gonna have a prototype for theirs in 9 years.
So china is still 5 years behind those. It takes time to make cheap counterfeits of other countries intellectual properties.
We don't need 1000 planes in the air to smoke the J20. Chinese equipment is garbage.
China is producing around 20 stealth fighters each year, while the US is building 150 F35 each year, and the US is building F18, F15, and F16 with record breaking production rate in the near future. So, no, China hasn't came near to the US production, let alone catching up the fleet sizes.
Where u get those data?
@@widodoakrom3938 he apparently didn't bother finishing the video
@@CircusJeanie2399 because the data in the video are false. Especially after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a lot of Chinese aviation parts came from Ukraine and Russia, Chinese fighter jets production will be significantly delayed. The video significantly overstated the Chinese production while underestimated the US expansions in fighter production.
"a lot Of Chinese aviation parts came from Russian and Ukraine". So you are basically living in the 2000s?The only part came from Russia and Ukraine was aeroengine,and even that ended in 2018,when China started to produce domestic ws engines.
@@walterblack723340% of J20 components came from Russia including the engine, wings and landing gears.
China's previously limited production capacity was due to barriers in sourcing advanced engines. Now that WS-10 is fully mature and ready for mass production, China is able to scale up plane production by double or even triple the initial rate.
@Brent Reid I don't know about three fold crashes, but there has been an uptick in crashes. Flight training hours have more than doubled in the past 10 years for PLAAF combat pilots. The type of training conducted also changed from simple flight training to more dangerous and complex combat maneuvers involving multiple units and plane types.
Unless you're implying something else?
Wait till Iran finish their paper airplane
Iran has JF 17 Pakistan fighter jet and don't forget their drones+new Russia sukhoi-35
@@widodoakrom3938 you said that like it's impressive.
If they can't build a rifle that doesn't keyhole, I doubt they can build a stealth jet that works
I think it's relevant to consider that the J-20 is more on par with the F-35, being a multi-role, BVR focused 'fighter', and not a stealthy air-superiority dog-fighter like the F-22 is. China still has nothing close to the F-22, and is likely also a generation if not more behind in air-superiority tactics and institutional knowledge.
Shit even comparing it to the F-35 is generous. Honestly more like the F15ex
the j20 is light years behind the f35
@@AnamolHouse china made anyway
J20 is vastly superior to f-35 lmao
Jesus sometimes people like you make me speechless, you watch military channels all the time you still don't know J-20 is NOT a multirole fighter? It only got one role that's sniping high value aircrafts with long range missiles, it's like the most basic knowledge it renders everything else you say pointless.
The best one is not even show up on foreign media.
Some comments make me grin because it shows the people who made them have no idea what China was like 45 years and how far it has come. If it continues at the same rate of scientific and technological progress it will easily overcome the USA by 2049.
A man living in the walls passing by.....the wards you said are unreasonable and ridiculous，which shows you never fully understand this place.This junk you are watching on this video can't threat anyone.Because it is the product of political operation, not military.
@@罗氏-b5h 感谢这位战忽局同志孜孜不倦工作到今天
Lol dream on.
@@BruceWayne-mb4hk China's dream is American nightmare...
@@罗氏-b5h 好家伙翻了墙还这么无知
The J 16 looks better than the SU 35, but it would be a matter of time to see how good it is
... I don't think it's a beauty pageant. But, if it was, my vote goes to the YF-23 Black Widow. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YF-23
@@azazelRising72 I love it, but it;s not as beautiful as F22
It's one thing to build a ton of planes. It's a whole other thing to keep them maintained, repaired, fueled, and updated for decades on end.
And pilots to fly them.
Yeah that was the thing about the whole "World's largest air force" trope that China was always supposed to have had for a long time.
Having planes doesn't mean having them operational.
And proper training for pilots.
How long has it been since Binkov did a country vs. country video?
OH NO the J-20 overtook the F22 production numbers????? Lol... you mean that aircraft that the US basically made none of....
Who cares when j20 will never see f22 raptor on radar and it will be snipped ez by raptor..
@@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr yeah that too! My point was that "we" barely made any f22s so it's not an accomplishment to have more of something that we do f22s. Lol. What was it like 160 or 190?basically 1 years worth of production of f35s. But yeah I don't think we have to be airframe geniuses to see that a f22 would easily own j20s. I still think there is alot of the Russia thing going on here too with most of the Chinese stuff. It sounds great... Like what they tell the world and the little we see... But it probably all sucks beyond our wildest imaginations. Lol
Its relevant to consider that while the jets
are being produced en-masse. It doesnt translate to true force projection. They're still far behind in both numbers and quality of air power. And sea power vessels are laughable in capability.
Its not really relevant since its not like the US wants to fight china, we know we'd win conventional conflicts just from the sheer difference in levels of actual combat capability in our force structures.
That doesnt mean to say China doesnt have quality forces or capability, but its been well proven what we can do and what chinese forces can do.
Now in a couple decades or more that could be very different. But technology is rapidly taking over in many areas so its almost pointless to speculate. The standards of "force projection" may very well be talking about entirely different parameters like Drones and AI and other weapon systems and not the traditional ones we think of right now.
Satelites, Drones, biological weapons and other tech will be the weapons of true comparison in future years in my opinion.
Another thing. While war simulation games are fun. Lets keep in mind that we shouldnt WANT to be adversaries without an actual reason. So far China has not taken military action on Taiwan and hopefully that remains true. Or on India or Japan.
As long as they do not strike against allies, there is still room and time to repair any damaged relations. This of course could be implausible, but its better than senseless War that no one wants.
Im half chinese, but i kinda want to see the us be more powerful lol. Whether what you say is true or not, the fact is… china is catching up. Which is scary.
@@Ahhh1 The unfortunate truth is that the US will not remain where we are at depending on what tech is introduced in the future. My timetable is a very hazardous guestimate since we dont actually know what the US government has in the "back room" so to speak. And the same is true for china and russia.
I'm assuming (with what we do know) that we will have the edge and advantage with military experience and power for many years. But traditional forces that we excel in will not be as important as drones and AI become more advanced along with new ways to project force through internet and satelite advances.
Even our sea based advantages which we have almost exclusive control over wont remain that way for long as weapons become smaller - but more powerful in unmanned capacities.
The truth is that the US needs help in the future. And if peace is to prevail, it is without a doubt going to have to be joint efforts to deter strong powers from pushing their weight on weaker countries without total war.
The days of US supremacy are going away. The days of any single country having global dominance are probably done. We had a good run but times change and the best we can do is recognize the US absolute power is not going to remain. And to adapt to what the world will be like and hopefully set the stage for a more peaceful coexistence as society (hopefully) progresses to more intelligence and reason.
"sea power vessels are laughable in capability. "
You need to update your knowledge. You are 15 years behind. It will take some time
@@zoka7108 I might have exaggerated a bit. But in comparison to what US ships are capable of (not even counting the Aircraft carrier fleets) it is not in China's favor by even the most generous estimates.
What makes USAF strong is their tanker fleet.
Small fast fighter attack craft and anti air makes you better
China doesn't need a big tanker fleet since they will operate close to mainland China.
@@bussolini6307 yeah it's can't be repaired if it's too far away from mainland anyways
which china is also building right about now
@@hondaservicecenter I guess you don't understand logistics. Btw, should be using a work UA-cam account, or is that some joke? Lol
Latest data from China indicates 160 J-20 has been delivered of 450 ordered
According to a recent report by ASPI on Critical Technology Tracker, China is now the world leader in 37 of the 44 separate sectors of technological development and research in the world, and is second place in many others.
This is something to consider when it comes to which side has the technological edge. The US is rapidly losing its advantage in technology to China.
Another thing to remember is just how powerful the Chinese economy now is, its already $19 trillion per year, and growing around 5/6% each year (they add the equivalent of the whole Italian economy to their own GDP each year). They have massive industrial capabilities and a lot of money to spend on defence, their defence spending is much lower percentage wise of their GDP than the US and less than most European countries, yet they are able to spend $250+ billion dollars on military equipment and defence per year, which means that they could easily ramp up the percentage of defence expenditure quickly.
all of that is a lie, china cant even produce chips for cell phones
@@BROCKUPPERCUTIn fact, no country in the world can produce chips alone, including the United States, but recently China HUAWEI collected parts have been all domestic, including chips, look at the information, do not live in the information cocoon created by the West
@@weberchangyes because China is an open and honest country
Think the US has about or over 1000 F-16 Vipers as well.... might be a bit dated but that jet still puts in work and is still the most cost effective option. #JakeHunter88
China be like: “bet you run out of missles before we run out of crappy planes”
LOL
Can’t say the same for the US aircraft carriers against Chinese missiles.
@@tkw3864 meanwhile china doesnt even have a carrier task force🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
We are going to see the biggest showdown in history of warfare.
Thats alright we'll have 6th gens before everyone
Yeah in about 30 years
@Pangolin maybe, unless you're part of the design team you can't know for sure
@@ZZZ2573 Do you even know what makes a plane six generation? I'll give you a hint it must have all the previous generational attributes and that's a start. 6th gen will even make the F-22 obsolete soon.
@@michaelmichaelagnew8503 so where is the American gen 6? actual plane, not ppt presentations
@Pangolin True, and thank you for being polite.
China is building these not even knowing if there actually good. While US are making newer and better ones , Also the US 6th gen fighter is coming soon.
Yes forget jets just produce nukes. And ICBMs
The US hasn't fought a near peer since World War 2. How in the hell can you tell if their equipment can hang with anything more advanced than a MiG-21 or MANPADS on camel back?
@@codyweaver7546 you forgot that the Korean War was a thing, didn't you?
@@braith117Does the Korean War count as coequal combatants?
@@codyweaver7546 exactly and those ended in stalemates a full war ground navy air force it’s a complete gamble
Eh bring it on . The Russian s400 was supposed to be able to take out HIMARS missiles but we know how that turned out. I have a feeling the J-20 will meet a similar fate
Sandbox news did an awesome comparison on this one. Def agree with you
things are always different in practice.
the main issue for both of them is practice / experience, because that will help them learn.
otherwise they get to do so the hard way.
What if fate doesn't turn out how you wish though? After all, it's a different country and equipment you cry about.
@@tritium1998 give me liberty, or give me death
S400 is a long range missile, HIMARs are rockets...
As a wise man once said
"OH NO!......................................ANYWAYS!"
Pls take note, in 2030, USAF will have 20-36 of 6th gen.
RG.
Insider...
Don't worry. China is weak and can't win. Everything cheap and breaks. underestimate China. Nothing to worry about. USA №1. USA have superweapon never seen. China don't know how to fight war. China only copy. EZ win.
China already has 5.5gen, the J-20S
@@The136th that's not 5.5 gen.
Well they'll just dispose of their "top tier jets" when their economy crashes due to maintenance costs
Economy crashes? Well I heard about it decades ago.
@@BabaYaga826 bruh their economy is in strain these days....you wouldn't know about it anyways.
Chinese economy is in strain and on the brink of collapse due to excessive e-state costs and a good amount of spending going to shitty projects like high speed rails. High speed rails in china costed upto 3 trillion dollars in gold and magnets while it has only been able to cover up a fraction of that value at 37p billion dollars. Their investments are being banned all over from sri lanka, turkey russia india brazil and south africa.
If this isn't signs of economic crash then idk what is.
@@AdityaSingh-fy5vv every year some new causes is cited for Chinese economy crumbling. In 1993 it was “Japanese Korean economies both collapsed and Chinese economy index is worse than them”, in 2008 it was “even American economy collapsed, Chinese economy will surely collapse”, now it’s “real estate bubble collapsed in China so Chinese economy must collapse”.
If you look hard, you will find economic shockwaves every year. I guess some people will just use these as justification for something they believe will happen.
@@AdityaSingh-fy5vv LMAO another China Uncensored bannon simp?
bruh Chinese economy are collapsing over 30 years in the mainstream media, it's literally call sustainable collapse, also US spend even more money than china did in infrastructure projects on the war on terror aka war on brown people
@@thomaszhang3101 nah bruh...this time it's real....do you rlly believe that china will outlive us or india for that matter? Cuz they have no stability, their govt is hated, and taiwan. Just taiwan.
Us declared it would defend taiwan from pla. So it's kinda in a bad spot. And everywhere china has a bad name so it wouldn't be a superpower.
Don't worry, my teacher said that it's fake video by CG, all of the j20 fighters were just paper tigers and the war ships were just fishing boats.
Exactly, don't worry my western friends, as you can see it's made in China, probably can't fly for long. You can't sleep well if you worry over nothing. So please assume they don't exist. 😘
U must have a great teacher
Best to assume they have more even if they don't. You can recover from being too strong better then being too weak.
@@andrewmckenzie292 This is just an aviation model. China can't make this at all. It's just a large model that can fly. In Asia, only South Korea and India have the ability to independently develop fighter jets. Even Japan has given up research and development, but South Korea and India's fighter jets have already appeared. You won't understand that South Korea is the first in the world, South Korea is a developed country, and India is only the second,this is the consensus of asians
@@bvusjxlee3941 you are not a Korean but an Indian troll hiding under a Korean name.