Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza and President Kennedy Assassination
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лют 2012
- The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza is located in what was once the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, the building from which Lee Harvey Oswald shot President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Museum curator Gary Mack spoke to a tour group led by historian Richard Norton Smith about how the museum presents the information about the assassination and ensuing investigations.
My dad was a witness to the assassination and has conducted an oral history interview with the museum. He suffering from stage 4 lung cancer now and 69. I'm glad he got the chance to tell his story.
I forgot I had posted a comment here until today (8 years later). Sadly, but expectedly, my father passed away 1 August 2014. I miss him everyday. But I am glad to have a copy of his oral history interview. It's so nice to hear the rich tones of his voice and his laughter. Boy, could I use his advice nowadays.
@@EricTurnerTN I'm really sorry for your lose. I hope you don't mind me asking but what was your father's name?
We worked on a documentary about JFK. Who was your father?
He saw Oswald shot the President?
I Hope He And You Are Doing Great Now 🙏
0:36 narrator got bars doe😳😳😳
Xd
Huh?
To paraphrase the genius Bill Hicks: That 6th-floor museum room and window at Dealey Plaza has been reconstructed so accurately ..that even.Oswald ISN'T in it.
Back and to the left back and to the left 🤦♂️
Not if he was hanging from the ledge by his toes
Being flown over by pigeons on his head
@@bigragu there were spotting of anti Castro pigeons going "cou cou"
he was in the break room on the second floor :-P
Sometimes, the hardest truth to live with is "I don't know."
That hardly applies to this situation.
Visited this museum 20yrs ago, very emotional place to be. The whole place touched me and I'm from the UK.
Yes it is , An air of Darkness forever haunts that place.
Rest in Peace John f. Kennedy
This guy changed his approach over the years so many times.
Lee Oswald has never been proven guilty
Yeah he was. Because Oswald died before Trial, a mock trial was held and Oswald was found guilty.
Oswald was definitely at a bare minimum one of the shooters.
How the hell can a bullet hit you in the back of the head from behind you and exit out of the right side of your head from the texas school depository window? The bullet would have exited out of the left front side of his head if that were true
I’ve been saying this for years…..when I investigated at the Archives and went to Dallas, the angles do not match up with the story….
Elm Street is a steeper slope than you might imagine, and it is a curved road there. JFK had been hit in throat and is slumping over toward Jackie, leaning to his left. It lines up. Sorry to say. Blood spray at Z-313 is above JFK's right temple.
Kennedy was leaning over toward Jackie ie. his left, in a car going down a road that sloped to the left.
There are many problems, why was the.bullet in JFK's back down almost a foot from his shoulder and then CAME UP to come out his neck?????
When it was supposedly shot from a DOWNWARD ANGLE?????
The bullet enteres JFK's head from the front in the right hairline hidden by hair and exited and BLEW OUT the back of his head. This was said by at least 3 or more of the Dr's that worked on him in trauma room 1.
Highly recommend this museum. Absolutely incredible experience.
Went to this museum last week,yes its an incredible experience.
JFK said no to Ben Gurion.. Jacob Rubenstein shot JFK. Sayanim!
Pity the bias towards the warren commission bias
You're an idiot.
Back and to the left .. Where is the answer to that ? The fresh mark in the curbstone? Jack Ruby, Oswalds past with the CIA and Soviet Union , bullet in pristine condition??? Really now ?
I went to the Sixth Floor Museum in June, 2018 and frankly didn't think too much of it. I'm not saying "don't go" but I am saying don't be surprised if you find it disappointing, particularly if you already know a fair amount about the assassination. The staff was really nice, though.
I think it is worth going there. Just to see the setup of the snipers nest where the shots were fired is something I liked seeing in person.
The people that worked there in 1963 didn't think much of it either.
I lived in Dallas for fourteen years and went there once, when we had a visitor from Ireland who wanted to see it. That was in 1997 because we saw the movie "Titanic" the next day.
They had the "sniper's nest" recreated but blocked off with plexiglass, and I think TV camera views of the street from the position. They kept part of the stairway that Oswald took down to the lunchroom, but it's an illusion and only goes partway down. Also a nice FBI-built model of the entire Dealey Plaza, and a copy of the famous 1966 "Esquire" magazine article listing 40 or 50 different assassination theories in vogue up to that time.
But if you're a conspiracy theorist, you'll probably be disappointed.
@@gregoryklein3311 😮
@@williamwingo4740 plexiglass is still there. The layout of the boxes is nothing like it was based on archival photos, but does lend a nice "touch". I think 99% of the people that go there expect to be able to look out that window, and of course cannot.
I love how the American justice system says Ínnocent until proven guilty' yet Oswald is constantly named as the killer, but was her ever brought to trial? No, Jack Ruby saw to that! He was never fond guilty in a Court of Law, so therefore, shouldn't he be presumed innocent???
Jack Ruby "was never found guilty in a court of law, so therefore, shouldn't he be presumed innocent???"
@@jeffblack2458 Ever see the movie "A Few Good Men"? If not then SPOILER: The guys charged with killing their fellow marine were found innocent of that specific crime, since Jack Nicholson's character gave them the order to, essentially. So yes, Ruby should be presumed innocent, assuming he wasn't ever convicted, which he technically was. Ruby tried to plead innocent on grounds of "psychomotor epilepsy" which he claimed caused him to shoot Oswald unconsciously, but was found guilty and sentenced to die by electric chair. The Texas Court of Appeals reversed the decision in 1966, on grounds of improper admission of testimony which denied Ruby his right to a fair trial, but Ruby mysteriously died in January 1967 while awaiting a new trial.
@@jeffblack2458 Thats totally different tho. He shot Oswald in front of a crowd of people in a police station and he was caught on television doing it. Oswald on the other hand didn't even have circumstantial evidence against him. He was set up and then executed to conceal the facts.
@@SniffHeinkel Do you have credible evidence that he was set up?
Actually being guilty of a crime has nothing to do with the courts. A trial and conviction is merely making it official with the government. For example: If I go out and steal a gallon of milk, and I don't get caught, that does not mean that I am innocent. It just means that I wasn't caught and convicted. An opposite example would be Jack Ruby. If the jury had returned a verdict of not guilty, that doesn't mean he's actually innocent, it would simply mean that the prosecutor failed to meet his burden of proof.
I think the main element is that Oswald himself was killed before he could be brought to trial thusly leaving so many questions unanswered.The actions of Jack Ruby were just as impactful as Oswald’s.
Actually the only unanswered question is why did Oswald do it. But Ruby did go to Trial, and we really never knew why he did it. I don't think either Oswald nor Ruby knew themselves why they did it.
@@radar0412Oswald did it because he was an attention seeker and desperately unhappy with his life.
The one question that must be answered for anyone who has been to that museum: if Oswald was there, WHY did he not take the direct, wide open shot right to the face as soon as the car turned on to Houston? It was like shooting someone walking right towards you.
Like Jim Marrs said Oswald blowed Kennedy's brains out with a curtain rod
If Oswald shot at the limo when it was still on Houston, he likely would have had time for only one shot before it would speed up and go past him. Also it would have been instantly obvious to the Secret Service exactly where the shots were coming from. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid.
@@aaronz7056 It was obvious in any case; Kennedy was shot at 12:30, police were in the building at 12:32, and even encountered Oswald on the second floor. One shot to the face is all anyone ever needs, to do what they are trying to do, especially with that kind of weapon.
@@iVenge He would have been an easy target for the agent's guns there, and he would have had much more time for shooting once the car had turned onto Elm, don't be ridiculous. Also, I doubt Oswald had the courage to look into a man's face as he murdered him.
Easy answer . A shot on Houston would had people look straight ahead and Oswald would have been spotted .When he waited most people were confused as where the shots came from .
The window on the sixth floor looks exactly the way it did in November 1963.... Oswald is not there.
@@IwshIcldstrtover I have been a quoted JFK researcher for 50 years. You have been have been a nobody for however many years you claim as an age.
The window itself looks the same as when Lee's punk ass was shooting JFK from it. Duh!!!
@@IwshIcldstrtover nobody cares who you are. Only that people know you are wrong
He says no evidence of any shots except from the rear. Dr. Charles Crenshaw, who attended Kennedy at Parkland, wrote a book that insisted that the fatal head shot came from the front. He marshalls quite a bit of evidence to support his view.
Crenshaw, a resident, was asked to hold a retractor (hook) so that another doctor could insert a breathing tube in Kennedy's neck wound. To do this, Crenshaw had to move to a point where he was looking down at the rear of Kennedy's head.
He asked the senior doctor if he had seen Kennedy's head wound. He hadn't.
Crenshaw described a 5-inch evulsed wound in the right rear of the patient's head. As they talked, Kennedy's cerebellum fell out onto the gurney.
Crenshaw later saw autopsy photos of Kennedy's wounds and insisted that some were incorrect.
Parkland doctors were muzzled for their whole careers and some are only recently speaking up about the odd experiences they witnessed.
Every time people use the words conspiracy theory they don’t realize the CIA actually coined the phrase to make it seem like a crazy idea. So many people have been duped by the CIA it’s unbelievable. I just saw the end of the shooting for the first time and 90 percent of the people ran directly toward the grassy knoll, the rest were staring at it.
Crenshaw is a somewhat shady character in this and many of his statements were highly suspect.
Shady how?
@@pamdronka1517 According to his book he had a central role in treating JFK, but he then told the NY Times he backed away from that claim, saying his co-authors "took poetic license" on this issue, admitting the role he played was minor. His descriptions of the head wound mostly describe the side of the head. Doctors like Jones and Peters were engaging in wild speculation as to the trajectory of bullets, in fact nobody could offer more than wild guesses, not having done a forensic examination that would allow determinations... but minor player Crenshaw had "no doubt."
As for his ridiculous claims regarding a "conspiracy of silence," the other doctors had been talking their heads off for nearly 30 years by the time of his book, often to conspiracy authors. Other claims of his are flatly contradicted by other doctors present.
The doctors never turned JFK over to see the back of his head, and in 1988 they appeared on a NOVA TV special, looked at the autopsy photos demonstrating only an entrance wound on the back of the skull, and agreed the photos were accurate and consistent with their memories.
40 people who saw jfk in parkland within hours said exit wound in low right back of head. As well 3to 5mm entrance would in the throat. No exit. Coaboraded by bullet hole in windshield entering from the front. 7.65 mouser rifle found 4 eye witnesses saw the gun within 8 inches reading 7.65 mouser on the barrel. The 3 cartridges found came from 6.5 carcono. An Italian ww2 rifle. Clearly a cover up at the least.
"Official truth exists to conceal the truth of officials." (Graffiti)
Yes the museum is very accurate; Oswald is not in the window.
too right. great comment my friend :)
He stole that from Bill Hicks...
Robin Sattahip Oswald was in the window at the time but when he saw Kennedy he took a magazine put in the gun and had a good site on a man shot him 3 times but give Kennedy a break man listen did a bad thing if something bad but I know the police would have got him was alive today he would be 101 years old and listen to the people that real stuff.
Well it's an absolute that somebody was in that window because the shooter and rifle were seen in the window. It is amazing though that an innocent man would leave his place of work unexcused and then shoot a Dallas policeman and then try to kill another when he was being apprehended. Is your evidence that all those facts are made up by the government? No evidence but the government must have covered it up? Can you answer just one thing? Why did Oswald leave and then take a bus then a cab and get let off a few blocks from his boarding house? I can figure out why he did not go right to the house. Then after coming and going from the house he is questioned by a police office and Oswald shoots him dead. Two women witness the murder and a dozen people are in the vicinity with some encountering Oswald. He is observed by a homeowner disgarding ammo on their lawn. He flees and is caught in the Texas theater and during his apprehension he tries to kill another Dallas policeman. Are you telling me everybody is lying and is in on the most massive coverup the world has ever seen. The reason your not going to respond is because you have nothing to rebut absolute facts.
Robin Sattahip FUNNY OSWALD WASN'T EVER IN THE WINDOW WITH A GUN. HE WAS ON THE SECOND FLOOR AT THE TIME OF THE ASSASSINATION.
Thank you for preserving this history.
He said "is there more to it" Now there's an understatement !
The "official" version is the conspiracy.
Who is watching this in 2019?
Till this yr its still a history n very interesting. 👍🏼👍🏼
March 15, 2020
Who STILL believes this B.S. in 2020?
@@joedanache7970 depends what B.S. you are talking about.
The throat wound was drastically smaller than the head wound. Why? two different kinds of firearms were used. This means two ( or more ) assassins. Two or more assassins = conspiracy. An explosive bullet was used for head shot to ensure JFKs death. Damage from this missile was much more extensive.
"The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza is located in what was once the
Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, the building from which Lee
Harvey Oswald shot President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963" cspan
oswald is the alleged assassin , he was never convicted of killing anyone , and as such has never been proven guilty of any crime .
"Museum curator Gary Mack spoke to a tour group led by historian Richard
Norton Smith about how the museum presents the information about the
assassination and ensuing investigations." cspan
mr smiths knowledge of the assassination it would seem is debatable if he has no qualms about the despicable way the 6th floor and the late gary mack have behaved in regards the assassination . and their treatment of robert groden .
Well Robert Groden is simply wrong
about what ? about being harassed , intimidated and bullied by the dallas police via gary mack and the 6th floor museum ? . you do know he took court actions ? its all documented . could groden be wrong about certain aspects of this case ? certainly , he is after all human .
Based on the evidence Groden is wrong thats all we have to go by we can not go by conspiracy theories because that is all they are theories Facts trump theories 100 percent of the time
My grandfathers cousin was 23 on that day and he was right across the street
he had nightmares for 37 years and had to go to thereapy for 14 years after that
If the original investigation - Warren Commission - had been better conducted, and had answered more questions than it caused to be asked, 'perhaps' there wouldn't be as much uncertainty regarding the assassination today.
The Warren Commission was not the end of the investigation into JFK'S assassination. Since then we've discovered more Ballistic evidence to conclude that Oswald was indeed the assassin of JFK. The Ballistics of the Imaginary assassins of the Conspiracy theorists have yet to make an appearance.
I still cry when I hear of Kennedy’s death
Me too is very traumatic
Well done Gary. We’ll miss your involvement. You had the best rebuttal of the patsy argument I’ve ever heard in an interview you did about ten years ago. I use it constantly
The citadel of mis-information !
One of the trauma surgeons at Parkland Hospital stated that one gunshot injury was an entrance wound not an exit wound meaning the shot came from the front not behind from the Texas school book building.
Kevin Lachowicz
There were no shots from the Front. Try looking at the autopsy photos and see for yourself.
Seems I read about that one too. Which if that's the case, it would defy the laws of physics as a bullet cannot have two entrance wounds. One from behind & one from the front.
When I was in high school I remember reading an article saying the fbi had to admit to being involved in this, it’s in papers somewhere
Also the cia an the mafia
Sounds super reliable and trustworthy, I mean papers somewhere. Settles it.
Only one side of the story has been told all the other information has been dismissed. It has been proven that the story is wrong.
I did the tour in 2014. Im a huge history buff. It was fairly interesting but it was just a lot of recreations and kinda boring long tour. I did my own after a while. Crazy seeing the perch in person. Disappointing it had the plexiglass up so you couldn't really get upclose and personal. But it was def worth seeing
i loved it spent the whole day there.
bethann landerstyle
History is always better WITHOUT GUIDE do your own research ✔
Well, if you got up to close you could see that it was unlikely he made the shot. 😂
i did. I was right there so if you actually read the post you would see it was likely he made the shot. You sound very uneducated@@libertycoffeehouse3944
If it was Oswald, why didn't he shoot when the car was coming toward him?
It seems that it would have been an easier shot.
it will be easier to catch because
If he shot that early the car would have quickly sped up and gone past him. Also it would have been instantly obvious to the Secret Service agents exactly where the shooter was. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid.
@@aaronz7056 disinformation agent. You are mad and stupid
@@GOOCHIElicker You keep following me around these videos making the same meaningless non sequitur without saying one useful word or offering any opinion on the case, and you call *me* mad? lol
(One shooter in the window) "...is very difficult unless you have enough time. If you have 7,8,9 seconds you can do it if you have used that weapon before".
So, regardless of eyewitness testimony, we get to make up how long the shots rang out. Doesn't matter how well documented it is.
Three shots at least, in *SIX* seconds. Two of which were maybe a second apart. No, that didn't happen from one lone shooter with a cheap bolt action rifle.
@TermsofService Uh-huh. 😂
Well we know it did happen because there is 53 pieces of evidence against Oswald impossible to be innocent with that much evidence
...and evidence is not proof. There is also evidence of others being involved.
But, that's ok. I'm not concerned about changing opinions.
Tim different people tell different stories of the space between the shots Jarman who was on the 5th floor said the shots were even a lot of people say more space between first and second shots and some say 2nd and 3rd shot on top.of eacj other only one can be right it also not 100 percent the timebot took to fire the shots because we really do not.know when that first shot was fired that missed
@TermsofService i agree
Are the curtain rods in the 6th floor museum?
the older fella who was deaf/mute said he saw puffs of smoke coming up from the tree line behind the picket fence (top of grassy knoll) . He seemed extremely credible and would have had an excellent view for it
Senator Yarbrough riding 3 cars behind Kennedy, a military veteran and competent hunter, said he smelt gunpowder at Street level almost instantly. He would 100% know what gunpowder smelt like so his testimony is rock solid!
I’d like someone to explain the physics of how gunpowder smoke from 60 feet up and behind Senator Yarbrough’s car could have descended and got in front of him in less than a couple of seconds!
Wind was gusting out of the North 10-15 miles an hour, blowing from the direction of the TSBD toward Main street and the triple underpass.
I always wondered: Why did LHO leave the rifle and snipers nest intact and easily discoverable? Shouldn’t he have closed the window, rearranged the boxes and found a better hiding place for the rifle (like under a floorboard or something)?
Mac Wallace was the man in the 6th floor window, his was the only print found in the snipers nest
Oswald knew it wouldn't exactly be difficult to zero in on him as Suspect #1 once he fled the TSBD, his only thought was to get away and out of the building as quickly as he could. He knew it was just a matter of time before the cops would be looking for him.
@@vlofvlDeceitful comment. Isn't in the Archives.
Yes, Oswald should have taken time to do all those things and more, and then just waited up there for the Cops and Secret Service to show up.
If Oswald was the shooter can't fathom why he decided
D to stop on the 2nd floor to finish off his lunch.@@aaronz7056
What a great talk.
Like in many other conspiracy theory realms, the fact that there's dozens of theories which are mutually exclusive - ie only one of them could be true - yet people cite evidence for all of them, demonstrates more people's need to believe in something, some kind of order or sense, rather than chaos, cruelty and deranged losers.
there's far too many weird circumstances with his assassination that make no sense to believe in just 1 shooter & no deeper plot including you have to believe in 2 losers Jack Ruby which makes the whole case even weirder. lot's of leaders for many reasons have been assassinated through 1000's of years of history & right up into today - some easier to prove - some less
If you knew one damned thing about trajectory, ballistics and capabilities of man, you wouldn’t have typed this statist drivel.
@@tinfoilsombrero1439 ua-cam.com/video/ghmY6HmR4fs/v-deo.html
@@AdeBamforth
A CBS broadcast? Ummm....okay. They don’t have a narrative to push. Again, you know nothing about ballistics or you would laugh at that report like a comedy show.
You might be surprised to learn that there's a high level of agreement among serious JFK researchers and none of it supports the official story.
Got to laugh at this, the narrator says he won’t draw any conclusions or take a side then only quotes the Warren Commission findings and regurgitates the cover story verbatim.
Load of crap!
This was recommended on my tripadvisor app.
No evidence of a shot from the front duuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhh. Two words pal Remington Fireball
saychinqua 1 James Files?
The shot that hit Kennedy in the throat, didn't hit him in the throat. The autopsy shows it was near the shoulder blade, and the bullet came out of the president's neck, near the Adam's Apple. This poses as an upward trajectory, which could mean the shot came from the front, because the line of trajectory is impossible from the 6th floor.
@TermsofService William Pitzer provides the evidence with his undoctored autopsy photos. Proof of head on front shot is in Zapruder film. Frame 313. Film experts conclude alterations to this film are impossible. The film the govt. Has is one of initially 3 copies then made.
Wrong would have showed up in xrays
@TermsofService nope youre wrong left side of brain intact
Gary Mack says that the medical evidence shows all shots came from above and behind. But didn't the Dallas doctors at Parkland carry out a tracheotomy on JFK and concluded the throat wound was one of entrance? Secondly over a dozen Parkland doctors said they saw the back of Kennedys head blasted out which could only indicate a frontal shot.Unlike many others I will never claim I know who or why JFK was killed. But my father was an ex policeman and he always said follow the physical evidence as that will tell what happened. In this case, the Parkland doctors were the first to see Kennedys body and as professionals I take what they as read
I think, there was a reason why LHO was killed by JR.
Dead man don't talk!
They "thought" the throat wound was an entrance wound but they were not sure; they quickly enlarged it to do the tracheotomy through without stopping to examine it. Likewise the doctors were engaged in a frantic effort to save JFK, never turned him over on his back, and were largely confused and contradictory as they tried to describe the tragic mess of his head. Years later they looked at the autopsy photos, which demonstrate an entrance wound to the back of the skull, for a NOVA TV special, and agreed the photos were accurate.
¡Las tonterías que hay que decir para conservar un buen trabajo! ¿Verdad que sí, Gary Mack?
1 was 15 and was offered 50.00 per round and cost at the time was 4.95 each at Sunny's surplus not worth a nickel more.
I have been there but its not certain Oswald shot or that the fatal head shot was fired from that window.
Unless you have Alternative rifle bullets and shell casings, then it's pretty much certainty that it was Oswald shooting from that window
the problem with the warren commission was that there were many angles that were not considered and many accounts were withheld. How can you make a valid conclusion if vital info are withheld?
Thanks Captain Vagueness
Strangely there were reporters who thought Jack Ruby was Secret Service on the ramp in the Dallas PD parking lot.
Super slow motion the zapruder film shows a lot of details that is hard to deny. Last 2 shots were very close together right on top of each other no way 2 rifles found on 6 floor can shoot that fast many resarchers believe Oswald had 1 an LBJ hit man Malcom Wallace had the other. Of course they were left there nobody dumb enough to leave a blg with rifle in hand after prez is shot. After throat shot jfk has his hands to his throat in super slow motion or frame by frame you see jfk briefly lean forward in pain this was the shot to the upper back which is shown in an autopsy photo. A second later you see jfk fall back quick to his left this was the last awful exploding bullet from right front side. Probably from under pass I read where a researcher with x on street an angle of jfk was from there could have been further down street though obvious same side of street zapruder is filming from right side of car. Won't convince me the last shot came from the 6 floor book blg he would have been shoved forward an bullet would have come out his face or front of throat area.
nightmare on elm street.
Funny you said that, because Everyone who Supported the Gorverment version or Warren Commission in the 1960s went on to become Presidents.Famous, News Anchors, on ABC CBS PBS and NBC Congressmen VPs, Extremely wealthy Business men , it's Almost like they were Rewarded by the Elites for their Betrayal of truth
There are a lot of videos on the internet of people being shot in the head. I've never seen one where the person's head and brains were projected out *towards* the shooter. Seems like there was at least a second shooter right in front of his motorcade.
Such videos exist, and JFK's head goes forward a few inches at the instant of impact.
That's because there were _at least_ two shooters. All the evidence proves it. Check out _Last Second in Dallas_ or the video here on YT, for example. Also, it's simply *_not_* physically possible to fire 2 shots in 0.75 seconds from a bolt action rifle.
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott
Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
_Our American Injustice System_
_Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
Thanks, very interesting, I was born in 57, like Caroline Kennedy... Gilles Brochet, Angoulême, France
I drove by the building yesterday.
He had that bolt action
With the increased knowledge of ballistics and in 2018 can they trace the magic bullet to the Oswald rifle?!!? Its in perfect condition. Surely they can say it is the bullet that killed JFK and wounded Connolly or not. That is the one good thing about the magic bullet. Its in perfect condition and scientists would be able to see if it was fired from Oswald's rifle or not ?!!?
Halotest100
Conspiracy kook's made up the name "magic bullet" No magic at all. It was a straight shot.
Oswald’s impossible shooting
ua-cam.com/video/rRFQcwLBe8E/v-deo.html
They traced the so called magic bullet back to Oswalds gun decades ago
The so called magic bullet that was found on a stretcher at Parklands hospital simply can not be the one that caused 7 injuries to 2 men!
It’s in almost pristine condition with only slight deformation which is impossible if it had hit flesh and been deflected by a number of bones before nestling into Connolly’s leg. Secondly, X-rays showed fragments of the bullet still inside Connolly but the bullet in question the one found on the stretcher had not lost any weight and was almost totally intact.
If those who believe the Warren Commission report want to use the Zapruder film as evidence then they also have to accept that the bullet in question, after hitting Kennedy, must have delayed its assault on Connolly for about a second and a half. The whole explanation of this bullet was the proposition of Arlen Spector, it’s his ‘Magic Bullet’ theory not those who are seeking the truth.
I remember Gary Mack (RIP) in a DVD I bought about the ASSASSINATION called WHO SHOT JFK
interesting stuff but I don't know what to believe lol
was the bullet that hit kennedy matched to oswald's gun? was that even tested at all?
All of the bullets and fragments found were matched to Oswald's gun.
My dad was 28 and my Mom was 9 when this happened
what
😂😂😂🤣🤣 28 and 9.
W G A S
Oswald was probably a shooter but there was another one or even two more shooters.
If they didn't have anything to hide why haven't they released all the files yet?
Safety of the living there are many things that could hurt people even if they are just accusations
Oswald said he was a patsy.
Oh, well, that changes everything!
In 1997,I left a curtain rod in the elevator.I wonder what the illegal alien cleaning the place thought when he/she found it.
Sodomite Dockery, when they work in official buildings, cleaners are no "illegal" aliens.
Probably thought....oh! What color curtains do
I need to buy.
" lie lie,,lie lie lie,,,,lie.
Oswald didnt do it, he was a scapegoat
I don't think. Oswald acted alone. How could he possibly. have known the route the motorcade. would take? How. could Jack Ruby. nonchalently walk into the police. station and shoot Oswald. as he was.being eescorted out? Why wasn't Oswald in Federal custody? Also think. someone else gave Oswald the rifle
How could Oswald possibly know the route Kennedy was going to take hell it was in the newspaper on Nov 19th 1963
Jack Ruby got lucky getting in that basement
Comments from ignorance. EVERYBODY in Dealey Plaza including Zapruder was there because they knew motorcade route in advance. And Oswald wasn't taken into custody by the Feds because assassinating a President WASN'T a federal crime at the time.
Why is there no footage of the camera looking from the inside out???????? ????????? ??????
This guy says (2:45) that these shots were "easy" for Oswald. But as shown right here, Oswald would have had to fire three shots in six seconds through heavy tree foliage with the last shot being the most accurate. No way in hell!
joe jones so easy most failed during a reconstruction. A reconstruction that wasn't accurate and much less difficult than the real thing. Remember there's more too it than distance time and motorcade speed.
The view of the limo at the time of the last shots was clear.
Comment from ignorance. Oswald didn't shoot through the Tree.
Who owns this museum? Follow the money....
That quote is from another scandal, let's not mix historical facts here :)
Almost every famous historical event, even decades later, continues to be characterized by doubts and sharp differences of opinion. A good example of this is the Battle of the Little Bighorn. It is the nature of these types of events that they will be forever controversial.
Except There is film and photographs taken in Dealey Plaza when JFK was shot. The battle of Little Big Horn? Not so much.
@@radar0412 You mean that Custer's troops had no Brownie cameras? Wow.
@@johnzajac9849 Desperate
ONLY three shots. What about the fourth shot recorded back at the station from the Police officer's radio key stuck open. What about all the extra bullet holes in the car and 3 or 4 SHOTS in the roadsign on the grassy knoll recorded by the ZAPRUDER FILM. THE SIGN WAS CUT DOWN BEFORE SUNDOWN REPORTEDLY BY TWO SECRET SERVICE AGENTS. WHERE DID THAT SIGN GO?
The dictabelt recording was discovered to be erroneous and was discredited decades ago.
It is worth the ticket price.
Tsnore yessss!!
Completely worth it.
Dumb ass
i was there today....
If you remember a face and body you can pic images available to where you can say that's what I saw.
Oswald shot the president, but, he did not kill him. The kill shot came from a Secret Service agent who was pulling his automatic weapon, stocked with exploding bullets. When the motorcade took off to get to the hospital, the car in which the Secret Service was pulling out his gun, and when the car jerked forward, the gun went off. That is the shot you see right after the sign from the McGruder film. The tale tell sign was the presidents head exploding. That requires an explosive bullet. Oswald did not shoot explosive bullets. That's why you don't get to know the truth.
Nope he pulled that weapon after the 3rd shot stop the misinformation
The SS agent's name was George Hickey.
Ridiculous rubbish.
poor old prople are thinking, where's my lunch
WE DON'T KNOW THAT ! 0:27
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's oswald.
We don't know what we don't know. It's all conjecture. Period. It is basically a crock of crap any which way you can.
On the question of the mysterious Secret Service agent in the knoll. Isn't it possible that the agent was originally stationed somewhere else, but abandoned it to help search for the gunman(men)? I mean The President had just been shot. The guy is just going to stand like a statue where he was assigned when the dynamics of the situation suddenly make such a harsh turn? Just a thought.
The S.S. agent on the knoll is a myth. One officer met a man who flashed some ID at him which he didn't even get a good look at and the man certainly never identified himself as a Secret Service agent. In that chaos he was probably another cop or even one of the reporters who abandoned the motorcade.
If you know your rifle it can be slick as glass .and there was a 2nd shot called a wax shell or a cut shell from the fence 🤔
Oswald never fired a gun of any type on 11/22/1963.
rtm457 your right. He fired two guns. Where do you folks come up with this? He as sure as the earth revolves around the sun killed officer Tippett and tried to kill another cop. Where are you getting your information from. His rifle at his work place. He leaves and kills a cop. This is actually probably one of the easiest murder cases the DPD have ever been faced with but guys like Mark Lane have perverted the issue.
Michael Chmelko NO NO NO OSWALD NEVER FIRED A GUN OF ANY TYPE. NUMBER ONE THAT PIECE OF CRAP CARCANO RIFLE HE OWNED WAS JUNK. THE FBI SAID THAT THEY HAD TO SHIM THE SCOPE BEFORE THEY COULD TEST IT BECAUSE THE SIGHT WAS SO OFF KILTER. THE REVOLVER HAD A BENT FIRING PIN ACCORDING TO THE FBI. WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU PEOPLE TO LOOK AT THE FACTS PLUS USE A LITTLE COMMON SENSE. WATCH THE ZAPRUDER FILM IN SLOW MOTION. BACK AND TO THE LEFT. BACK AND TO THE LEFT. IT'S CALLED PHYSICS. BACK AND TO THE LEFT. THE DOCTORS AT PARKLAND ALL SAID KENNEDY HAD THE BACK OF HIS HEAD BLOWN OFF. FORGET THAT FAKE AUTOPSY THAT THE GOVERMENT TRIED TO SHOVE DOWN OUR THROATS. THE GOVERMENT WAS GOING TO TELL US WHATEVER THEY WANTED US TO BELIEVE. BACK AND TO THE LEFT. REMEMBER THAT.
You're right; he fired a rifle that killed the president. Read Vincent Bugliosi's book "Four Days in November" and you will know what really happened on that awful day in Dallas...
That's what I'm saying everything was planted on the 6th floor
Big coverup!
I used to think conspiracy but after much research I think one lone nut can alter history.
Ignore the man from behind the iron curtain on the 6 floor named Os.
Concentrate on Az at the knoll.
It was Az who took Kennedy's headshot.
Who's az?
@@webtheweb 1. A.z is pronounced Oz or Os.
2. A.z is the opposite of Os.
3 A.z shot JFK .
4 Az is the knoll shooter .
5 , A.z. is Abraham zapruder.
A.z. got 150,000 for shooting Kennedy .
@@saskoilersfan that's interesting, never considered him the shooter. I can consider it, but how was he recording and shooting at the same time?
@@webtheweb the media's said it was shot twice.
The original shooting in black and white ...the reshooting in color by life magazine.
The original film shows a man filming Az shooting Kennedy.
The re shooting shows from Az point of view shooting Kennedy .
The confusion created via real and reel.
The confusion created of nobody behind Az.
Smoke screen...the perceptions of merged shooters and reports of reports.. headshot of a head shot . 8 mm gun and 8 mm camera .
It's all comes back to life magazine ..a hit....a dead president....a retelling of mirrored events...150,000 pay out....and surrounded by media's troupes .
Military troops and media's troupes both shooting JFK...
Booth was one of media's troupes who shot Lincoln in a ford .john shot Abraham.
A.z. was one of media's troupes who shot Kennedy.
Abraham shoots John.
To me , coincidences are a type of mirror to decieve.
Sure Abraham Zapruder shot JFK, while Oswald was having a coke ignoring Kennedy's motorcade. You solved it all right.
It does seem to fit perfectly that Oswald did it, his rifle, his job site, and what innocent person kills a cop on his lunch break. Yet his murder on Sunday morning by Ruby cast doubt and conspiracy.
So he killed two persons on a single day; quite a feat!
Yes but Ruby was emotional idiot too
The eye witnesses to the J D Tippet murder could not identify LHO as the killer, this included the closest witness who actively refused to agree it was LHO when the police shoved Oswald’s picture in front of him.
Of course there is doubt, Ruby killed Oswald to silence him. Even Ruby admitted that there was so much more to the story and nobody was talking....except James Files!!!!
@@vlofvl Not true, a steady chain of witnesses firmly ID'd Oswald as Tippit's killer, on his escape route, his attempt to hide in the storefront, and his attempt to kill MacDonald with the same gun in the theater only minutes later.
BS
As I am anything but an expert on the JFK case, can someone tell me once and for all: did this building have only one entrance, or was there also an emergency exit ? (I mean, with all that paper in it, and the dangers of a hugh fire, I suppose it did have an emergency exit ?)
Was the complete building only filled with school books or were there also other departments, companies etc in it ? How many people in all were working in it ? Could someone who didn't work there easily have gotten into the building without having been noticed ? (was there a counter at the entrance with someone checking ID's etc.) Was the paper in which Oswald supposedly had wrapped his now famous curtain rods ever found ? Were the curtain rods ever found ?
-It was a warehouse for books only
-Anybody could come and go as they pleased. This was 1963
-The paper which LHO wrapped the rifle was found
-No curtain rods were ever found
I think there was 5 or 6 doors including loading docks
Benoit Vanhees ALSO THERE WAS CONSTRUCTION WORK GOING ON ON THE SIXTH FLOOR. ALSO MAC WALLACE'S FINGERPRINTS WERE FOUND ON BOXES NEAR THE SIXTH FLOOR CORNER WINDOW. HE IS THE SHOOTER.
No curtainrods, and we know the Manlicher Carcano couldn't be folded in the way LHO was said to have carried the parcel inside. But if LHO "did it", why would he have bothered going out through the main entrance (as did Billy Lovelady). In the end, I think some people managed to "muddy the waters" so much, that it is nearly impossible to write in red letters all the facts that are confirmed and correct, and leave all the things that were thought to be correct, were claimed to be correct but weren't etc. in black. For every small detail of this case, there seem to be 22 versions and 17 possible people involved leading to 44 possible explanations....
It's odd that so many things have been written about the JFK case, but that details such as the correct numbers of doors that were OPEN on nov. 22nd, no clear answer seems to be available. Bercause, were these "5 or 6" doors also OPEN, or were these locked on the day of the assassination ? This are essential questions of course...
I'm satisfied that Oswald acted alone.
I have been to the sixth floor and cannot figure out why Oswald did not shoot Kennedy when the limo was on Houston St. He would have had a very close straight on shot. Maybe because there were other gunmen in Dealy Plaza. Maybe on the Dal Tex building and the Grassy Knoll and or the triple underpass or in the sewer manhole cover or any of several other places. Maybe two different people in the School Book Depository. Oh yeah I forgot the Secret Service agent in the Cadillac behind the limo with his gun drawn that when he lost his balance fired the head shot. We will never know any of the answers because there a people that dont want us to know. Maybe we should ask George Bush why he was in Dallas that day. However it is fun to speculate how and why and who did this.
Because the secret service would have seen the rifle as they were approaching the building and would have been able to take action. So Oswald waited until their backs were to him.
@@richardcook6284 wtf are you talking about dumb fuck??
Oswald didn't kill anyone, in fact he didn't even fire a weapon that day. They gave him a Paraffin test which proved he hadn't fired a rifle. Lee didn't shoot officer Tippit we know because the bullets from his revolver didn't match the ballistics of the bullets that killed Officer Tippit. Additionally, there was a witness to the Tippit shooting who stated that Oswald wasn't either of the men who shot Officer Tippit.
Paraffin tests are notoriously unreliable and were used primarily to intimidate suspects. The bullets were a perfect match to his revolver, the one he tried to use on MacDonald only minutes later. A steady chain of witnesses ID'd Oswald.
Links and citations if you please. Without a credible source these are mere assertions.
This is correct, also no fingerprints on the gun. FACT.
Both of Oswald's hands tested positive in the paraffin test.
Did they end up buying the entire building? Are the other floors still used as offices?
I believe they only bought the 6th and 7th floors? The rest is businesses? I think that's what I heard
@@radar0412 do you think Oswald shot from there? Have you seen the interview with James Files?
@@bernie4268 Evidence matters. Interviews? Not so much.
Remember the Ammo?
Two armor piercing one factory load the blood volume comparison was to that of a toad!
No human anatomy reaction to the ballistics, but something else I mean really, really, really something else!
Parafin tests were done on Oswald, he had not fired a weapon! Bing it!
I see you're not a serious researcher are you?
Youre wrong he tested positive for the pistol
What the tour operator is saying is basically what the Warren Commision said at the time. I don't think he's saying what he really thinks. The Warren Commision is the funniest thing since the Three Stooges. It's choc-full of shit. Pure and simple!
One thing to keep in mind, LEE OSWALD WAS NEVER CONVICTED OF ANYTHING.
Tell that to Ruby
Tell that to J.D. Tippit too
Neither was Hitler.
I wonder if his being dead had anything to do with him not being convicted?
Multiple shooter theories do not have to prove who the other gunman are, they simply need to present enough information to debunk Oswald as a lone gunman, and they have done that. The evidence showing Oswald was a lone gunman does not meet the standards of beyond a reasonable doubt. Oswald would not be convicted if a trial were held today. And evidence that is sealed in secrecy would need to be released to help identify other persons involved in the murder of Kennedy.
You need to provide some ballistic evidence. All of it thus far point to the Carcano
Take a tip from me. Ignore FIVE_O_FEVER. He likes trolling people. He tried to do that to me & I MUTED him from responding back. If you don't agree with his stupid logic he'll argue with ya. I do my reading & my research & from best selling authors who do even more reading & research & in a lot of case's they go directly to the source. That said, that Five idiot I would pay him no mind. But I do agree with you on what you posted. Great job my man!!!
The evidence against Oswald does not fit beyond a reasonable doubt youre right abot that how about any doubt 53 pieces of evidence against Oswald impossible yo be innocent with 53 pieces of evidence against you
Oswald would have been convicted in an open and shut case.
We do know who the shooters were, - at least five of them, Malcolm Mac Wallace, Eugene Hale Brady, Johnny Roselli, Chuck Nicoletti, and James Sutton, later known as James Files. It is entirely likely that there was a sixth shooter, but it could not have been LHO.
We can count eleven shots, there might have been more that were undetected, - the one that hit the chrome windscreen surround, the one that went through the windscreen, the one that hit the Stemmins Freeway sign, the one that hit the sidewalk and injured James Tague, the one that ripped through the grass alongside the limo, one that hit JFK in the throat from the front, the one that hit JFK in the middle of his back, the one that hit JFK in the back of the head a fraction of a second before the final killer shot to the right front temple, fired from the front. And then the two shots that hit John Conally. Eleven shots.
Who were the conspirators? The Federal Reserve, represented by John Mc Cloy, the CIA, the FBI, the Mob, and LBJ. Twenty-six representatives of these groups met at Clint Murchissons mansion in North Dallas on Thursday evening 21st November to finalize plans. They made a toast to the "Great Event " to take place the next day.
Wherever James files got his story from...was probably from the shooter or someone who had knowledge of the shooting.. when he said a round hit Kennedy pushing the head forward and a second round hit Kennedy within a fraction of a second and blew the head backwards.. which is exactly what you see in slow motion... so either files adopted the story as his own after the death of the real killers or he was a weapons transporter... the part where he says he took the rifle apart behind the electrical box..is exactly what Ed Hoffman's story discribed ..he seen a man toss a weapon to another man and adjust his hat and walk away. the only one of the tramps wearing a hat was Chauncey Holt...was Hoffman actually seeing files put the fadora on his head rather than adjusting it.. if Hoffman's story is original than which guy is files .. if he was anyone of those men.. and didn't just hear it during a card game in Chicago...we know how those mobman would talk while they stuff their faces getting shitfaced
Wrong Bugloshi showed the head went forward 2.4 inches before it started going back
Files wasn’t there, and even if he was….the angle does NOT WORK……
Files is a demonstrable fibber.
This is what happened that morning of November 22, 1963 in Dallas and the Zapruder video speaks very clearly. The presidential limousine takes Elm Street and after a few meters the first shot fired by Nicoletti starts who, together with Rosselli, was hidden in the Dal Tex Building. The first bullet misses its target and hits the sidewalk of the triple railroad crossing at the end of the square and a splinter ends up in the face of James Tague, a passerby who was standing there. The second bullet hits Kennedy in the throat, and as you can see in the footage, the president puts his hands around his neck and Governor Connally turns back to understand what happened. The third bullet misses and ends up on the lawn where it is later found by an FBI man and Deputy Buddy Walthers. The fourth bullet hits Connally who emits a grimace of pain as seen in the video and brings his right hand to his stomach because he accuses an immediate pain and then the bullet pierces his right wrist and plants itself in the thigh of his left leg. The fifth bullet hits Kennedy in the back of the head and the sixth bullet, fired by James Files hiding on the grassy knoll half a second after the fifth shot, sends both blood and Kennedy's head back, and the brain leaking was due to pressure. of the sixth bullet that had left an apple-sized hole behind Kennedy's head, as evidenced by photos of 14 people bringing their hands to the same spot on their heads. I say with certainty that the bullets were 6 because it seems that a shot was fired about every three seconds, that is the time to reload the rifle. Returning to Connally, which is the key to clarifying the mystery well, there is a lot to say. 1) First of all, from the angle in which Oswald would have found himself shooting, which was about 45 degrees, only Kennedy and no one else would have hit, the bullet could not in any way make a deviation and then hit the governor. 2) When Kennedy is shot Connally turns around to see what happens and stays there for about three seconds, the time to reload the shot in the rifle; if the governor had been hit by the magic bullet, at the same time as the president, he would have had the same reaction as Kennedy and would have neither the way nor the strength to look back. 3) Governor Connally when he is wounded is still turned and you see a grimace of pain as I mentioned before him and then turn forward again and collapse on his wife's legs. 4) In the video you can see how Connally bumps his head in front of the glass that separates him from the driver's and assistant's seats. 5) Do you know why Connally was hit? Both because Kennedy threw himself on his wife's right shoulder, because bending over did not hinder the trajectory of the fourth bullet that almost grazed him hitting the governor, and because the shot was fired by Nicoletti from the window of the Dal Tex Building and reached the governor, because Kennedy was leaning towards his wife. So, not only does the first missile reveal where the shot really came from, but also what hit Connally. Indisputable and real evidence, but unfortunately denied by many, including the Warren commission which veiled so much evidence.
No evidence for that conspiracy rubbish.
I thought it was one of the security officers on the car behind accidently firing.
That ridiculous story is long since discredited.
Nobody on the ground or watching from the TSBD testified to that.
0:06 The Lorraine Motel, where MLK was shot on the balcony, is in Memphis, Tennessee. That must be quite a fast bus tour to get from Memphis to Dallas.
Read "Reclaiming History" a 100% factual based novel that will give people as fair revelation as to what happened in Dallas that day.
(Tragedy exists)
Theorists: Allow me to doubt that to look smart
There is a reason they do not allow the general public to look out the window. I was allowed to look out it during a construction project on the top floor of the market place. You can not see the street below where the first shot happened due to the height and angle of the 6ths floor. Unless you hang out the window by your ankles..the first shot was impossible
Interesting . . . Gary Mack says the purpose of the museum is to not draw their own conclusions. But 10 seconds before that the narrator specifically states that it was Oswald who did it. It's also interesting that museum patrons cannot get to the window where Oswald allegedly was because it's closed off with a plexiglass barrier. Why?