Somebody died on the Garuda flight so Sully did do the better job. Sully also had the lowest engine failure ever, while the Garuda flight still had a lot of altitude.
its not abdul rozaq's fault that someone died, sully had way more space to land in the water than rozaq and rozaq had to land a 737 in the solo river, very narrow and very shallow with lots more rocks. Also the tech back then as worse than now and GA421 happened first. Abdul had to land at a high speed impact between two bridges which made the space even smaller, the weather in GA421 was also way worse and the plane had engine flameout for both.
The flight attendant was on the tail not wing and the tail of the plane was crashed to a rock The the flight attendant bounced from her chair and drowned @@pear-76f
its not abdul rozaq's fault that someone died, sully had way more space to land in the water than rozaq and rozaq had to land a 737 in the solo river, very narrow and very shallow with lots more rocks. Also the tech back then as worse than now and GA421 happened first. Abdul had to land at a high speed impact between two bridges which made the space even smaller, the weather in GA421 was also way worse and the plane had engine flameout for both.
Abdul was the original owner of the idea. If Abdul never existed sully wouldn’t have been able to land. R.I.P Abdul Rozaq he died on March 1st 2019. He was trapped in a fire and the sad part is that he was only 32 years old I just give less respect from chesley
Ok 1. Of all: a flight attendent died 2. Of all Pam am flight 6 landed in Water in 1950s or something so the pilot of the flight 6 was the original "creator" of the whole Water landing
Somebody died on the Garuda flight so Sully did do the better job. Sully also had the lowest engine failure ever, while the Garuda flight still had a lot of altitude.
its not abdul rozaq's fault that someone died, sully had way more space to land in the water than rozaq and rozaq had to land a 737 in the solo river, very narrow and very shallow with lots more rocks. Also the tech back then as worse than now and GA421 happened first. Abdul had to land at a high speed impact between two bridges which made the space even smaller, the weather in GA421 was also way worse and the plane had engine flameout for both.
@@SirRocko you’re right
@@SirRockoit’s not why the flight attendant died it’s because the wing hit the water hard
The flight attendant was on the tail not wing and the tail of the plane was crashed to a rock The the flight attendant bounced from her chair and drowned @@pear-76f
@@ZinnEdit1doesn’t make sense
its not abdul rozaq's fault that someone died, sully had way more space to land in the water than rozaq and rozaq had to land a 737 in the solo river, very narrow and very shallow with lots more rocks. Also the tech back then as worse than now and GA421 happened first. Abdul had to land at a high speed impact between two bridges which made the space even smaller, the weather in GA421 was also way worse and the plane had engine flameout for both.
Garuda, Indonesia for21 was in 2002 and US Airways 1549 was in 2009
Abdul was the original owner of the idea. If Abdul never existed sully wouldn’t have been able to land. R.I.P Abdul Rozaq he died on March 1st 2019. He was trapped in a fire and the sad part is that he was only 32 years old I just give less respect from chesley
Ok 1. Of all: a flight attendent died 2. Of all Pam am flight 6 landed in Water in 1950s or something so the pilot of the flight 6 was the original "creator" of the whole Water landing
+ flight 6 had no deaths
u got urself a new sub
En su pais no lo homenajearon ?
I dont care what abdul rozaq's do
Dont say that
so you don't care abt sully? because if abdul rozaq didn't made that sully would have failed, also abdul did it first