PRE-WAR HISTORIC COVENTRY CITY BEFORE BOMBING!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • Old Photos taken of the historic Coventry city centre before WWI and WWII bombing damage. Includes images of the historic Coventry Cathedral.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @jcoker423
    @jcoker423 7 років тому +50

    Thanks. I guess people are now aware that the destruction was started and finished by the council/city planners. I've just been to Dresden after 30yrs, they've rebuilt the FrauenKirke and restored much else. Shame we didn't do the same.

    • @savvageorge
      @savvageorge  7 років тому +10

      I agree, the city planners made a bad situation much worse for Coventry. Great to hear that Dresden has now recovered. Hopefully Coventry can follow Dresden's example and become more like the dynamic city it was in the past.

    • @mexdal
      @mexdal 5 років тому +10

      Yes most citys were rebuilt with ugly cheap buildings and tower blocks.

    • @c.v.yardley
      @c.v.yardley 4 місяці тому

      I've been to Dresden, and beautiful though it is, all the reconstructed buildings in one part of the town give it the feel of an open air museum, whereas the other 'normal' part is quite separate. I prefer Coventry Cathedral, actually, as it's much more symbolic, combining the old with the new. Also, the Frauenkirche cost nearly €200m to re-build, which is a lot of money for a mere copy.

    • @jcoker423
      @jcoker423 4 місяці тому +1

      @@c.v.yardley Thanks for your opinion. But would you prefer a rebuilt Butchers Row or the Precincts? Have you seen photos of Cov before the war? Like York, Chester.. etc.
      I have been to Dresden before (87) and after the rebuild a few times. I prefer the rebuild. But once again thanks.

    • @mel4333
      @mel4333 3 місяці тому

      I agree

  • @phoenixkelly8936
    @phoenixkelly8936 10 місяців тому +4

    I was born and bred in coventry and I have done so much research on our home town definitely nothing like the place is now unfortunately 😔

  • @mel4333
    @mel4333 3 місяці тому +4

    Wow the old Coventry really looked better than now.

  • @davidhayes9045
    @davidhayes9045 3 роки тому +4

    I know Coventry very well, so i recognise quite a few places in this video.
    Great! Thanks...

  • @paulmcginty6530
    @paulmcginty6530 4 місяці тому +3

    I know life is of the paramount importance in war, but War is one almighty slap in the face for past generations of builders/craftsmen who took great pride, spending many years building landmarks, bridges, monuments only for them to be completely obliterated from history.....Its a damn shame 😟

  • @markjohnson8276
    @markjohnson8276 3 роки тому +7

    I would have loved to be able to of walked the streets before the war, must have been amazing.
    Some of the recent work they have completed has improved certain areas, hopefully that continues throughout those areas.

    • @commenty6233
      @commenty6233 3 роки тому

      They are still working very hard on it even today
      Just to recognize the city one more time...

  • @thethe6232
    @thethe6232 2 роки тому +9

    It use to be a lovely place ! Jesus , WTF happened! The City council can’t blame it all on the Luftwaffe! I think their dodgy deals with the University has some part to play !

  • @alfindigo
    @alfindigo 2 роки тому +8

    The town planners had a clean slate to rebuild Coventry after the war. It all went well till the late ‘70’s, now it’s just a mess.

  • @bens1972
    @bens1972 Рік тому +5

    It’s interesting how so many cities in Britain that were impacted by the Luftwaffe that are now victims of Britain’s dreadful post-war town planning. Serious damage was done by the bombing, but even more so by the subsequent ‘improvements’. In fact, I don’t really see much improvement today. With banal, generic architectural non-entities, whose vernacular free design can be seen repeated in cities up and down the country.
    Coventry, like it’s neighbour Birmingham; once Proud industrialised cities, now stand without any identity. The victims of cheap town planning. Now even into the 2020’s the subsequent town planning sees yet more banal architectural monstrosities, like the library in Birmingham; and the Bull-Ring shopping centre that is fading like it’s predecessor. Leaving the brash shop frontage of £1 shops and bookmakers to infiltrate as the nails in the coffin are prepared.
    Unfortunately, unlike Germany cities, architects detested the pastiche (and still do); town planners didn’t have neither the purse strings, nor the foresight to invest properly. Which is why Dresden’s ‘pastiche’ is still standing and in Britain countless millions are wasted on pulling down Bull-Rings and replacing them with the same ineffectual replacements.

    • @robtyman4281
      @robtyman4281 Рік тому

      Plymouth was also made worse by over zealous town planners in the 50's and 60's. Southampton too.

  • @kennethmarburger9747
    @kennethmarburger9747 3 роки тому +7

    Sad. I was there. The ruins r terrible to see. Very emotional experience.

    • @commenty6233
      @commenty6233 3 роки тому +1

      I know I lived in there for 10 years it makes me sad that such a butiful city was bombed

  • @wobblydangly
    @wobblydangly 2 роки тому +9

    Why was it so badly built back? Compare and contrast with German cathedral cities like Cologne

    • @carloakley5367
      @carloakley5367 2 роки тому +3

      It wasn't coventry people building it🤪

    • @Dilley_G45
      @Dilley_G45 2 роки тому +1

      I lived near Cologne in the 2000s. It is very ugly 1950s and 1960s architecture mostly. The cathedral miraculously survived the bombing including a dedicated USAAF terror attack designed to destroy it (to block the surrounding roads with rubble, an idea as mad as hell). Most of inner city Cologne is ugly ugly ugly

  • @daynaholgate7264
    @daynaholgate7264 2 роки тому +3

    I wish my own city was still looking like that these days!!!

  • @peterhodgkinson9287
    @peterhodgkinson9287 2 роки тому +7

    Coventry Cathedral should have been rebuilt as the previous. Today it looks grotesque & incongruous. Somehow I can't believe that those who advocated the style believed in it. Was it an attempt to create social realism? It has more in common with a building from??

    • @nottmjas
      @nottmjas 2 роки тому +3

      Peter, I disagree with you regarding the new cathedral as its the only post war building that shouldn't be pulled down.
      Broadgate House at the top end of Hertford Street should be the first to go, followed by Cathedral Lanes and the Primark building (the rear of the building from Cross Cheaping is hideous). Make Broadgate the front garden of the city it once was.

    • @paulbroderick8438
      @paulbroderick8438 2 роки тому

      Alfred Herbert offered financial assistance to restore the cathedral to its once glorious self, however, arrogance and 'progressive' thoughts got in the way no doubt. The 'new' cathedral is pathetic. You have only to consider what they did to Butcher Row as an example! Carry on Sargeant Major, carry on!

    • @jimmorrison2657
      @jimmorrison2657 4 місяці тому

      @@nottmjas When it was a garden, all of those buildings you mentioned were already there. The Broadgate in this video was not a garden.

    • @nottmjas
      @nottmjas 4 місяці тому

      @@jimmorrison2657 you're dead right: the layout of modern Broadgate as a square is postwar. The prewar Broadgate was narrower, but still wide, and longer terminating somewhere within the footprint of the Primark building.
      What I should have said was that the northern, western, and Hertford Street sides of the square are way past their shelf life and should be redeveloped. Cathedral Lanes is just awful full stop.

    • @jimmorrison2657
      @jimmorrison2657 4 місяці тому

      @@nottmjas Ideally speaking, I think you are right. Those buildings in Broad gate should be demolished and replaced with something decent. But I just think that if the council demolished them they would put something even worse in their place. I don't say that everything the council does is crap, but a lot of it is. E.g. They knocked the Hippodrome down, which was quite a nice building, and replaced it with a curved wall.

  • @-Atmos1
    @-Atmos1 2 місяці тому

    A beautiful place

  • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy
    @Charlesputnam-bn9zy Рік тому +1

    The church spires are astounding !

  • @Mick_English
    @Mick_English Рік тому +3

    Terrible music choice

  • @commenty6233
    @commenty6233 3 роки тому +1

    I live in Coventry there's soo much bombed areas
    Like about 30% of them are churches

  • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy
    @Charlesputnam-bn9zy Рік тому

    Don't forget the Germanazi predilection for Baedeker Raids, Vandal atavism oblige.
    They were the 1st to bomb London in WW1 by Zeppelin air ships.

    • @MarkHarrison733
      @MarkHarrison733 4 місяці тому

      The RNAS had already bombed cities in Germany in 1914.