@@snoopdogg_007 I am not saying they are gaining from underperforming. But instead of launching new funds to attract new money they should focus on fixing performance of existing funds.
What a paradox??. At fund house level our analyst thinks holding fifty plus stocks are good for diversification. But at individual portfolio level they advise keeping only one fund from each category. Doesn't it carries risk of excessive concentration??.
Ask them to manage their (PGIM) existing funds better. PGIM midcap has been a ridiculous under-performer.
Exactly...all their existing funds are massively underperforming
Front running type kuch karte honge, Still understanding what would they gain from underperforming?
@@snoopdogg_007 I am not saying they are gaining from underperforming. But instead of launching new funds to attract new money they should focus on fixing performance of existing funds.
@@kulkraghav absolutely agree with you!💯 so confused about what to do with their midcap fund, lolz
What a paradox??. At fund house level our analyst thinks holding fifty plus stocks are good for diversification. But at individual portfolio level they advise keeping only one fund from each category. Doesn't it carries risk of excessive concentration??.
Great video!
What's with their Midcap fund. When will it come up. Getting difficult to hold for long.
Pgim are worst funds
Their only good thing is their downside protection.. but I do agree with you about the underperformance