Great video very interesting to see how things have changed and people's ideas would have liked to seen the avro arrow another Canadian achievement on your list
Umm... glossing over the "Christmas Bullet" story there quite a bit. He knew little to nothing of aeronautics or aviation design. As I recall, the dude was a medical doctor. His plane was hopeless and obsolete (to put it kindly) even before it was built. Nothing about it made sense, and the lack of struts for the wings pretty much guaranteed their weakening and eventual breakage.
Love how there’s no continuity from what’s being said and what’s shown. Talk about the duck and show video of the Bonney Gull. 🤷🏼♂️ Talks about Sopwith triplane and shows a Fokker DR.1, Calls the Christmas Bullet a monoplane yet it was a biplane. You claim the Bullet had a radial engine yet both were powered by a Liberty 6 inline liquid cooled engines. Shows video of an IL-2 and maintenance being performed on a Tecnam 2006 The VZ1 was built by Hiller, not heller and no it didn’t use “tip jet propulsion” 🙄 I can keep going but it would be as pointless as this video. A definite thumbs down 👎
first
one of my favorite vintage plane designs was the Horten Ho 229 flying wing. A very interesting looking little plane.
Mine too!
Excellent video again
Thanks for watching ❤
🤣🤣🤣 this video is FULL of errors and false information. Hardly “excellent”
Great video very interesting to see how things have changed and people's ideas would have liked to seen the avro arrow another Canadian achievement on your list
Great suggestion!
I hear Chris Kane aircraft runs on sheer will power.
🛩
The Pterodactyl had a front mounted engine, not a pusher as stated.
That Lipish Delta 4 was not a supersonic aircraft.
You wouldn't catch me in any of those.
Umm... glossing over the "Christmas Bullet" story there quite a bit.
He knew little to nothing of aeronautics or aviation design. As I recall, the dude was a medical doctor. His plane was hopeless and obsolete (to put it kindly) even before it was built. Nothing about it made sense, and the lack of struts for the wings pretty much guaranteed their weakening and eventual breakage.
Love how there’s no continuity from what’s being said and what’s shown. Talk about the duck and show video of the Bonney Gull. 🤷🏼♂️
Talks about Sopwith triplane and shows a Fokker DR.1, Calls the Christmas Bullet a monoplane yet it was a biplane. You claim the Bullet had a radial engine yet both were powered by a Liberty 6 inline liquid cooled engines. Shows video of an IL-2 and maintenance being performed on a Tecnam 2006
The VZ1 was built by Hiller, not heller and no it didn’t use “tip jet propulsion” 🙄
I can keep going but it would be as pointless as this video. A definite thumbs down 👎