HMS Prince of Wales Broken Again | Why INS Vikramaditya deserves respect | हिंदी में

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 сер 2022
  • This is a video on HMS Prince of Wales Broken Again | Why INS Vikramaditya deserves respect
    #HMS #Prince_of_wales #INS_vikramaditya
    Website: thedefencematrix.in/
    Discord Link: / discord
    Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
    Twitter: / defencematrix1
    Music : Art of Silence - by Uniq" is under a Creative Commons license (Creative Commons - International Recognition 4.0 - CC BY 4.0)
    Intro Music : Credit Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
    *FAIR USE*
    Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
    Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 291

  • @deviprasadsahoo7553
    @deviprasadsahoo7553 Рік тому +114

    With your analysis, both Indian Navy and INS Vikramaditya deserve lot of respect for operating such an old carrier with aplomb 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

    • @laarbpad2107
      @laarbpad2107 Рік тому +1

      “Aplomb” is a great word! I wish it were used more often.

  • @agonnoga6100
    @agonnoga6100 Рік тому +116

    Today, Britain is not known for manufacturing or innovation.
    Nearly all major British auto companies are owned by foreigners.
    Many well established British companies are also owned by foreigners.
    What we are seeing with HMS Prince Of Wales is a sign of decline in British industry. Britain, is basically a small island.

    • @danielrauf4094
      @danielrauf4094 Рік тому

      Yes and mostly western companies are owned by Chinese company

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 Рік тому

      And now let's remember how you (Americans and Europeans) giggled at Kuznetsov ... And Kuznetsov reached the point according to the plan, completed the combat mission and returned to the port on his own.
      And your "trough with nuts" is already being tested - falling apart.
      And there are only 4 reasons:
      1. An idiot - a sailor was put on the lubricant button (who is an idiot - command or sailor - choose for yourself).
      2. A multi-gender sailor stole all the lube for his "own" use. The ass is not made of iron.
      3. The multigender team stole all the lube.
      4. Your Aircraft Carrier is shit.

    • @svs4305
      @svs4305 Рік тому

      Then why Indians go to uk for higher studies and work

    • @deang5622
      @deang5622 Рік тому +2

      Complete bollocks. The two new aircraft carriers are a sign of innovation. Typhoon fighter is a sign of innovation.
      And we've just built a new type of nuclear submarine.
      And we have developed several new types of Navy warship.
      You are talking out of your backside.

    • @agonnoga6100
      @agonnoga6100 Рік тому +1

      @@deang5622 large number of British companies are owned by foreigners. Britain from being a manufacturing and innovation powerhouse, has moved to services.

  • @paparazzi.IndianFootball
    @paparazzi.IndianFootball Рік тому +171

    These are one of the most complex machines on Earth. The more complex they are... More the surface area of potential problems/malfunctions that can occur.

    • @blazingguyop
      @blazingguyop Рік тому +5

      Nah bro
      Not so complex
      The complex ones have lot of things and state of the art technology

    • @chintanpanchal6806
      @chintanpanchal6806 Рік тому

      @@blazingguyop PPL ll

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 Рік тому

      And now let's remember how you (Americans and Europeans) giggled at Kuznetsov ... And Kuznetsov reached the point according to the plan, completed the combat mission and returned to the port on his own.
      And your "trough with nuts" is already being tested - falling apart.
      And there are only 4 reasons:
      1. An idiot - a sailor was put on the lubricant button (who is an idiot - command or sailor - choose for yourself).
      2. A multi-gender sailor stole all the lube for his "own" use. The ass is not made of iron.
      3. The multigender team stole all the lube.
      4. Your Aircraft Carrier is shit.

    • @josephstalin9604
      @josephstalin9604 Рік тому

      @@blazingguyop ok

    • @doge3169
      @doge3169 Рік тому

      @@blazingguyop alright seems like u can make one too, go ahead

  • @deepjoypaul3806
    @deepjoypaul3806 Рік тому +19

    Petition to bring old intro

  • @dochardiksolanki
    @dochardiksolanki Рік тому +16

    I think the credit to keep our old military equipment working goes to our defence personnel. We do make some of the best engineers in the world!

  • @vikrantsatpute9984
    @vikrantsatpute9984 Рік тому +120

    A British aircraft carrier breaking down is strange as the Indian Navy had operated 2 ex British aircraft carriers in the past (Vikrant and Viraat)

    • @kratos71
      @kratos71 Рік тому +25

      Also secondhand

    • @rahulbhattacharjya3676
      @rahulbhattacharjya3676 Рік тому +45

      Those were in the hands of Indians and not current day brits

    • @aryansrivastavaa795
      @aryansrivastavaa795 Рік тому +26

      One thing I can say for sure that our armed forces are best in The world in terms of maintaining and operating any kind of system

    • @miralam2582
      @miralam2582 Рік тому +5

      Those were lightweight carriers and well maintained by indian navy

    • @jivanchopda
      @jivanchopda Рік тому +3

      @@aryansrivastavaa795 Indeed they are.

  • @TheAshutosh58
    @TheAshutosh58 Рік тому +34

    We should still wait and see the performance of Vikrant before placing order of another aircraft carrier. Its important we straighten out our preferences first and then make one. Rather than making one and then modifying it heavily.
    Although again 2 aircraft carriers on each front at a time is a wonderful idea but considering how INS Vikramaditya demands maintenance navy would be adamant on third aircraft carrier.
    It would be better if Navy instead procures more landing platforms with STOBAR capabilities.

    • @mahatmagaand
      @mahatmagaand Рік тому

      INS Vikrant is a failure
      theprint.in/opinion/brahmos-ins-vikrant-have-immense-capability-but-also-expose-indias-short-sightedness/1106880/

    • @surajkumar-uo1xp
      @surajkumar-uo1xp Рік тому

      I feel having more ballistic and cruise missiles will be more useful and practical, Both Economically and Practically.
      the aircraft carriers are more for a "show force" type of use, also since India normally has a Defensive or Neutral Stance we don't really need another aircraft carrier, right now at least.

  • @user-Uchiha_Clan_Master
    @user-Uchiha_Clan_Master Рік тому +13

    Some experts suggest this design to Indian navy 😂😂 we should consider French or Japani cv design for upcoming INS vishal or make by own.....

  • @saptarshipal700
    @saptarshipal700 Рік тому +44

    Navy should go for a 45000 ton class catobar IAC, so that Govt. will have less issue with budget. France is doing quite good with their 40000 ton class Aircraft Career.

    • @DDG_IN47
      @DDG_IN47 Рік тому +7

      Should be at least 50, 000 tons or +5, 000 tons for intense power projection as the Indian flagship carrier.

    • @knightofgodserventofholymo7500
      @knightofgodserventofholymo7500 Рік тому

      We are going to built 65000 ton carrier...Cochin Shipyard limited is building a new dry dock for 70000 ton carrier

    • @subhajit201
      @subhajit201 Рік тому

      Do u even know the type of issues and snags the french r facing with charles de gaulle

  • @hrithikbhogal6367
    @hrithikbhogal6367 Рік тому +2

    Apna un sabhi ko jawab diya hai jo INS Vikramaditya ko baakar kahai tai hai. Good job brother.

  • @sigma-sigma1
    @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +28

    In fact there seems to be lot of "double standards" In our country as views of certain people are concerned about, that the defence equipments of certain countries origin are supposed to be "useless, junk, worthless" etc Even inspite of Indian armed forces having had good combat record with those equipments ,whereas equipments from few other countries origin are supposed to be of 24 karat gold standards with no flaws in it and if we have those countries origin equipments then victory in war is supposedly automatically guaranteed.

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +6

      Even "brahamos" Is supposed to be a junk because it got accidentally fired and entered Pakistan and travelled 300 kilometers deep inside Pakistan without being detected and it failed to hit anything in Pakistan😄😄

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +3

      @John Hero whether it be an upgrade or a downgrade what you want and see in combat is combat effectiveness.

    • @pax4370
      @pax4370 Рік тому

      @@sigma-sigma1 abhijit iyer mitra comin at ya😂😂

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +2

      @John Hero be it from Russia or be it from prussia, east or west india should have the best.

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому

      @@pax4370 abijhit "mitra" is supposed to be a very close" friend " of defence matrix. 😃😃

  • @peteip2604
    @peteip2604 Рік тому +8

    Britannia once rules the waves, INS Vikramaditya will rule the Indian ocean and the HMS Prince of Wales struggle to rule 5 miles off the English coast.

  • @supremeleader5516
    @supremeleader5516 Рік тому +9

    Soviet engineering 🔥

  • @vibhavtamore1172
    @vibhavtamore1172 Рік тому +29

    Surprised to know about a British aircraft, (not expected this) and at the same time, proud of the quality demanded by our military. JAI HIND.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Рік тому

      modern day British equipment are subpar quality. So is the maintenance.

    • @boejiden7093
      @boejiden7093 Рік тому +1

      @@rohitb5834 besides the F-35. Those are not subpar. And the boxer IFV, Challenger 2 tanks, a couple more things that make them more advanced.

    • @pradyumn2692
      @pradyumn2692 Рік тому +1

      @@boejiden7093 F35 is from US.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Рік тому

      @@boejiden7093 lol look at those heavy 62 tons tanks with underpowered 1200 engines which give them subpar Power to weight ratio.
      I would like them to try half the user trials Arjun mk1 was put through in extreme conditions.
      And not to mention weaker Rifled guns that cannot fire ATGMS.(Lesser muzzle velocity than Arjun's Rifled gun).

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 Рік тому

      And now let's remember how you (Americans and Europeans) giggled at Kuznetsov ... And Kuznetsov reached the point according to the plan, completed the combat mission and returned to the port on his own.
      And your "trough with nuts" is already being tested - falling apart.
      And there are only 4 reasons:
      1. An idiot - a sailor was put on the lubricant button (who is an idiot - command or sailor - choose for yourself).
      2. A multi-gender sailor stole all the lube for his "own" use. The ass is not made of iron.
      3. The multigender team stole all the lube.
      4. Your Aircraft Carrier is shit.

  • @Military_Buzz
    @Military_Buzz Рік тому +18

    *HMS Prince of wales breaks down*
    Admiral Kusnetsov carrier : " First time ? "

    • @irachowdhury4847
      @irachowdhury4847 Рік тому +1

      Ohhh god............that one heck of a piece of machine.
      But Soviet quality at it's best, I should not be surprised, should I !

  • @babanagrahim5439
    @babanagrahim5439 Рік тому +16

    This is what happens when u build according to fit other country fighters rather than building your own

    • @burlatsdemontaigne6147
      @burlatsdemontaigne6147 Рік тому +7

      What has the type of fighter aircraft got to do with a bent propellor shaft?

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +1

      @@burlatsdemontaigne6147 😃😃

    • @sigma-sigma1
      @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +1

      @@burlatsdemontaigne6147 maybe he believes that they tried to fit "aircraft's propeller into ship's propeller shaft 😄😄😄

  • @chanakya5480
    @chanakya5480 Рік тому +15

    Uk must imported materials from China 🤣

    • @abyyy490
      @abyyy490 Рік тому +1

      Kya chyna china laga raqha hua hai yar bhai . Joke's old now, feeling more like a trope .

  • @agonnoga6100
    @agonnoga6100 Рік тому +33

    INS Viktamaditya was not built as an aircraft carrier but as a missile cruiser cum helicopter carrier. In other words it was meant for anti ship and anti submarine operation not as an aircraft carrier.
    It was facing problem with the boiler and was mothballed shortly after its manufacture and hoodwinked India into buying a missile cruiser as an aircraft carrier.
    Way forward for India is to order another one or two Vikrant class aircraft carrier modified to operate as LPD and aircraft carrier instead of 4 LPDs and one large aircraft carrier.

  • @kartikeyasv571
    @kartikeyasv571 Рік тому +25

    Our airforce symbol has to be changed to Garuda sri mahavishnu vahana

    • @djmoh.6509
      @djmoh.6509 Рік тому +8

      Himalaya Egale is the symbol of IAF . Himalaya Egale is also a symbol of Garuda as Garuda was the fast and fly hight than any other creatures of that time. Himalaya Egale fly at the highs of world.

    • @godxnoobgaming8514
      @godxnoobgaming8514 Рік тому +1

      😂 lol

  • @parthasdasgupta
    @parthasdasgupta Рік тому +9

    Knowing Cochin Shipyard employees I know that are one of the best in India. LNT is the best.
    British Aircraft Carrier was probably grounded. It's probably a operational problem not a engineering problem.

    • @surajkumar-uo1xp
      @surajkumar-uo1xp Рік тому

      Probably both, remember lobbying and favorism affects high tech weapons in all countries lol, even American Aircraft carriers had Sewage problems and all Toilets getting blocked just coz of dumb decisions made during manufacturing.

  • @heetjoshi9913
    @heetjoshi9913 Рік тому

    Thnx for information..plz make Detailed VDO on INS VIKRANT...Jai Hind..

  • @leonidus370
    @leonidus370 Рік тому

    A detail informative video

  • @jaybhatt3515
    @jaybhatt3515 Рік тому +7

    Devloped contries are not always ahead

  • @sudhanshu1208
    @sudhanshu1208 Рік тому +4

    Please ek video HMS Duncan ya horizon class destroyers par inme bhi kafi problems hai they are similar to kolkata class destroyers 48 vls 7000+ tonege

  • @babuvishwass5910
    @babuvishwass5910 Рік тому +4

    But according to many Indians F-35 is best Fighter Jet of this planet even after knowing it is facing many Technical Problems.

  • @aarshbhushan1062
    @aarshbhushan1062 Рік тому +11

    I seriously don't know why people nowadays hate Vikramaditya sooo very much
    Just because it is Russian, it is bad.
    This is all they've got to say🤦
    Bruh get some help pls😐
    Navy is proud of her
    Navy considers her better than vikrant
    Navy is satisfied with her
    Then what's the problem?

    • @raghurajan336
      @raghurajan336 Рік тому

      Who said it's better than vikrant?

    • @aarshbhushan1062
      @aarshbhushan1062 Рік тому

      @@raghurajan336 You can find tons of interview here on internet
      And the reason is "Vikramaditya is in operational condition and has taken part in many big exercises like Malabar 2020(the most recent) and many other
      While vikrant is just a try , we won't consider her the best carrier we can make but yes she is good and we hope we can build even better than her"

    • @raghurajan336
      @raghurajan336 Рік тому

      @@aarshbhushan1062 I'm asking how vikramaditya is better than vikrant?
      Vikrant is new and it'll take time to analysis its full potential to naval exercise.

    • @aarshbhushan1062
      @aarshbhushan1062 Рік тому

      @@raghurajan336 Bhai maine kya likha hai fir?
      Padh toa lia kar kuch bolne se pahle🤦

    • @raghurajan336
      @raghurajan336 Рік тому

      @@aarshbhushan1062 last third line
      Navy consider her better than vikrant

  • @INDIANGAMER-pn9rw
    @INDIANGAMER-pn9rw Рік тому +3

    Jai Hind

  • @mrsahoo9560
    @mrsahoo9560 Рік тому +7

    What about Chinook news.. 400 us Chinook grounded..

  • @hrushikeshavachat900
    @hrushikeshavachat900 Рік тому +4

    While primary users like USA and major operators like UK are facing major issues in operating F-35, Indians want to acquire F-35. Probably wr have better technology and higher budgets

  • @gajendrasbhanot6259
    @gajendrasbhanot6259 Рік тому +2

    Jai hind

  • @S_K_J
    @S_K_J Рік тому +45

    Carriers should not be made for only one type pf Jets .INDIAN navy got lucky that FA18 can be used from Vikrant ,otherwise it was purely made for mig 29. And i still think twin island design is the worst design for an Carrier. If even one island gets destroyed ,that carrier can be sunk any time ,its dosent matter 1 island or n number of island.

    • @djmoh.6509
      @djmoh.6509 Рік тому +6

      We need Submarines . Carrier are waste of money

    • @nightowl1435
      @nightowl1435 Рік тому +4

      @@djmoh.6509 Indian navy officers say other

    • @shirokun4742
      @shirokun4742 Рік тому +4

      @@djmoh.6509 Submarine aircraft carrier dono ki jarurat hai
      Agar pura indian ocean ko control karna ho

    • @fraktur960
      @fraktur960 Рік тому +3

      @@djmoh.6509
      I won't say waste, buy yeah we need submarines more than Aircraft Carriers. We should at least have over 35 submarines befor go for a third aircraft carrier.

    • @bineetgupta
      @bineetgupta Рік тому +7

      @@djmoh.6509 when planes from Chinese super carriers or Chinese bombers enter the Indian Ocean, then you will take them down by firing torpedoes from submarines.

  • @gauravanand2897
    @gauravanand2897 Рік тому

    Situational Awareness 😎🌹🌹

  • @beingethicalwithlogics3113
    @beingethicalwithlogics3113 Рік тому +1

    Jai Hind 🇮🇳

  • @pandit6331
    @pandit6331 Рік тому

    देशों को आपको मुख्य रक्षा सलाहकार नियुक्त करना चाहिए। आप जैसा ज्ञानी कोई नही🤩🤩🤩

  • @hiteshkumarsaini1907
    @hiteshkumarsaini1907 Рік тому +1

    GE XA100 Engine और NGAD पर Detail Video बनाएं।

  • @swarankitjain2651
    @swarankitjain2651 Рік тому +6

    Bharat Mata Kii Jai.
    Yahan ki Harr Cheez Mitti kaa Karj Chuka deti.

    • @abyyy490
      @abyyy490 Рік тому +1

      Abe tu insan hai ki bot yeh out of context chize kaha se le ata hain tu . Salla yaha banda British aircraft carriers ki midway stalling ki bat kar raha aur tu hai ki mitti ki karz chukane pe pahunch gaya, connection kya hain . Tiranga film dekh aya hain kya.

    • @swarankitjain2651
      @swarankitjain2651 Рік тому

      bhosdike. Pehle Tu pura video samajh, kiii kis context mai banaya gaya hai.
      Yahan baat vikramaaditya ko criticise karne ke uppar ho rahi hai, kii kaise 3.5 billion dollars kaa aircraft carrier bhi itne harsh environment mai success nahi ho paa raha hai. Jabki vikramaaditya apni harr duty ko pura karr raha hai.
      Rahi baat bot kii, toh mere comment se jiss tarah tera pichwada jala hai, Tu special liberal gang kaa bot samajh aa raha hai.
      Chal bhaag

    • @danielrauf4094
      @danielrauf4094 Рік тому

      Shame on hindutva andh bhakt 😆

    • @swarankitjain2651
      @swarankitjain2651 Рік тому +1

      @@danielrauf4094 shame on u and ur religion. Chal bhaag England.

    • @cute3498
      @cute3498 Рік тому

      @@danielrauf4094 aagya rice bag convert jesus ke maa khud gye

  • @aryanyadav3690
    @aryanyadav3690 Рік тому +15

    INDIA's logistics is best in the world after USA 💯

  • @saurabhrai5461
    @saurabhrai5461 Рік тому

    INS Vikrant will tell us about our optimization and technology. It's a proud moment for us. If it can serve the purpose on low maintenance then it will be a big asset because then using the same technology we can make one more Aircraft Carrier because the maintenance of an aircraft carrier takes at least 5 to 6 months and we need to have at least 2 aircraft carriers deployed in the Indian waters.

  • @crimsonfury7811
    @crimsonfury7811 Рік тому

    very sad to hear about HMS Prince of Wales. I hope they will bring out some solutions.

  • @BlackStoneSlayer
    @BlackStoneSlayer Рік тому +2

    Good

  • @karambirduhan1996
    @karambirduhan1996 Рік тому +1

    Hey buddy why US grounded whole fleet of chinokk, please make a video on this , as we operate them too and planning to order more

  • @Atom00.1
    @Atom00.1 Рік тому

    In these class of carrier one thing is good that is in side of angled runway there is space for keeping fighter.

  • @limeshpatel263
    @limeshpatel263 Рік тому

    Make same type video on uss general r Ford...

  • @abhijitbhuyan8528
    @abhijitbhuyan8528 Рік тому +2

    Don't compare between British and Russian products . Also it's very strange that Indian are defending Russian products. There must be some interest for that.
    Jai Hind

  • @viraajsingh8269
    @viraajsingh8269 Рік тому

    🙏🙏 veer ji

    • @abyyy490
      @abyyy490 Рік тому

      Han bol langarjeet

    • @AshutoshKumar-tw4dv
      @AshutoshKumar-tw4dv Рік тому

      bai is abhishek bnde nu ignore kri eh har kisi nu ulta sida boldya pya comment ch ja ja ke . troll account hona eh

    • @abyyy490
      @abyyy490 Рік тому

      @@AshutoshKumar-tw4dv abe tu langarjeet ka support kyu kar raha hain , yeh kal aake tughe story sunaye ga ki kaise sikhon ne hinduon ko bachaya si . Lol. Langarjeet salle .

    • @AshutoshKumar-tw4dv
      @AshutoshKumar-tw4dv Рік тому

      @@abyyy490 kuch sikhon ne hindu ko bchaya kuch hindoun ne sikhon ko bchaya acchae log hmesha ek dusre ki help krte hai isse se duniya chlti hai teri bhi kisi ne help ki hogi tune bhi kisi ke help ki hogi

  • @Beautiful_Earth1827
    @Beautiful_Earth1827 Рік тому +1

    Indian Navy should have build Big Lifts like Prince of Wales have...

  • @pranavsivakumar3873
    @pranavsivakumar3873 Рік тому +1

    1:21 'STOBAR design hai to maintenance zyada hai'. can u elaborate how? it doesnt have any moving parts unlike a CATOBAR carrier.

  • @the_fourth
    @the_fourth Рік тому

    Even US navy's newest carrier Gerald R Ford faced a lot of issues since it commissioning in 2017 and its the most advanced one out there.

  • @AKSHAYKUMAR-hg4vk
    @AKSHAYKUMAR-hg4vk Рік тому

    well us flagship aircraft carrier uss gerald r ford also have issues when it was inducted in us navy . its a part of operations malfunctions happens . in indian navy also . but this is preety insane hms prine of vales .

  • @sk-dr8zu
    @sk-dr8zu Рік тому

    ins vikramaditya is also docked for maintanence after fire reported during regular sea exercise. vikramaditya is expected to be docked for 1 year for maintanence and upgrades .

  • @omkumardubey9249
    @omkumardubey9249 Рік тому

    bhaiya please make video on Chinook undergrounded in America

  • @Therabbit2210
    @Therabbit2210 Рік тому

    Its better to have good number of submarines instead of floating mammoth machine that is not only costly to build but also costly to operate and maintain solely.

  • @rohitb5834
    @rohitb5834 Рік тому +1

    Lets be clear, these jokers dont have money. They wanna maintain their "stature" by making 2 huge while elephants, but in reality during war they can only make shoe polish for their American masters.

  • @lone3023
    @lone3023 Рік тому

    Bro can you compare our new aircraft carrier to other countries carriers

  • @royal1932
    @royal1932 Рік тому +1

    Intro song kon sa hai koi toh batao ???

  • @samsar785
    @samsar785 Рік тому +1

    The electric propulsion system which Indian Navy ⚓ is currently evaluating for INS Vishal will not be able to power EMALS based CATOBAR system, Electromagnetic Railgun at the same time sustain a speed of 32knots in high seas with all sensors and ancillary operations on. Look Gerald R Ford with 2x700 MW of power produced by A1B Bechtel is insufficient to power every systems and face frequent blackout in GRF. How will electric propulsion do it for Vishal?

    • @patrickweaver1105
      @patrickweaver1105 Рік тому

      You can skip the railguns it's a unworkable idea. EMALS takes a surprisingly small amount of electricity. It's actually far more efficient than steam. The A1B reactor is the most powerful naval reactor in history and works flawlessly. Power is power electric or steam. The critical questtion is where the electricity is coming from and the power of the motors. Westinghouse already builds motors that match the horsepower the steam turbines of the USS Gerald R Ford so that's doable.

  • @sachinvasu-mz4ye
    @sachinvasu-mz4ye 6 днів тому

    ins vikrant

  • @sultanqureshi2766
    @sultanqureshi2766 Рік тому

    Where is this animation from

  • @sbibankingguru
    @sbibankingguru Рік тому

    If CAG audits happen on cost , maintenance, and operational availability of INS Vikramaditya, then it will be pointed out by the CAG the huge loss to the state.
    The accountability can not be fixed on anybody.
    The purpose of the carrier for the nation is not fulfilled.
    Tax payer are happy to see that.

  • @sunnyteron8837
    @sunnyteron8837 Рік тому

    LOOK at those lifts, can lift 2 F-35 at a time.. Those are some big lifts

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 Рік тому +1

    INS Vikramaditya (R33) needs to be retired asap . . . because STOBAR aircraft carrier don't serve the navy's true purpose of reach & mission doctrine . . . the naval carrier borne F-35B Lightning II VTOL maritime multi role fighter needs to have folding wing tips for better stowage in not so big aircraft hangar decks, where usable space is at a premium . . .

  • @zackcarl7861
    @zackcarl7861 Рік тому +2

    My das old Jeep is more reliable than that 🙂 $4billion jugad

  • @AmongUs-qt3uo
    @AmongUs-qt3uo Рік тому

    Actually every navy that operates big ships like these faces challenges but everyone just wants to have a go at India coz they dont like to see us progress and are jealous

    • @viraj565
      @viraj565 Рік тому

      Yes! And its always the same jokes too, build toilets first or dirty this and chaotic that, used to be gdp back a few decades ago, now they cant use that so its per capita income garbage but then when we mention purchasing power parity then they revert back to nominal gdp. Its like a child trying to win a loosing argument 🙃

  • @anchitlalit9117
    @anchitlalit9117 Рік тому

    Oh sNice tutorialt... I did not realize I got tNice tutorials many replies to my comnt cuz youtube did not send the notifications lmao. I didn't even know I

  • @amalkrishna8924
    @amalkrishna8924 Рік тому

    Instead of vishal navy must move with submarines

  • @thetruth8265
    @thetruth8265 Рік тому

    Next Vishal should be of 130k ton

  • @bebyfun
    @bebyfun Рік тому +1

    क्या नेवी p 75I ko tyag kar 76 trf jaa raha

  • @spoidy3180
    @spoidy3180 Рік тому

    Images kon si game ki he🙏

  • @janabreactions2639
    @janabreactions2639 Рік тому

    Best of luck India #asiacup2022🇵🇰

  • @AbhishekTiwari1111
    @AbhishekTiwari1111 Рік тому

    Britain is continuously offering India to build its Vishal aircraft carrier on queen Elizabeth class design. India has its own capabilities to build its futuristic aircraft carrier, we don't need any British assistance in defence because it is worst. India should go for a defence pact with France.

  • @user-ss7qs4ps1i
    @user-ss7qs4ps1i Рік тому

    Don't mind me asking but how much service time does the Vikramidiya have compared to the Prince of Wales

    • @lktan224
      @lktan224 Рік тому

      Tying to the mooring area 365 days.

  • @axel665
    @axel665 Рік тому

    VTOL aircraft has more maintenance

  • @Beautiful_Earth1827
    @Beautiful_Earth1827 Рік тому

    Iska Matlab Prince of Wales AC se dusra Aircrafts use nahi kar sakte right !!!???
    Only F 35 B.

  • @rakeshdhruvvlogs
    @rakeshdhruvvlogs Рік тому

    Mahanga roye ek bar...
    Sasta roye bar bar...

  • @prashsharma9629
    @prashsharma9629 Рік тому

    It’s not the flag tho. The flag ship is queen Elizabeth. This is the second aircraft carrier.

  • @smartbaba1321
    @smartbaba1321 Рік тому +1

    Quality of "Made in Britain"😂😂

  • @muneeshsharma8649
    @muneeshsharma8649 Рік тому +7

    Iski pooja karvao thk se

  • @davey2363
    @davey2363 Рік тому

    British craftsmanship….the best in the world. Should have bought American off the shelf….🇬🇧

  • @abhinashoberoi9780
    @abhinashoberoi9780 Рік тому

    Russia se Aircraft carrier Lena he nahi chaiya tha...

  • @laxminada8730
    @laxminada8730 Рік тому

    Aircraft carrier are sitting ducks during wars...India should buy more submarines and destroyers rather than 5 billion sitting ducks...

  • @cascito
    @cascito Рік тому

    VTOL sucks , they use much more fuel to take-off, carry less weight and range is also low...

  • @Villain1874
    @Villain1874 Рік тому

    13 years to build one ship how embarrassing 😂

  • @salmankowser3921
    @salmankowser3921 Рік тому

    হ্যেলো

  • @planecrazybelike6505
    @planecrazybelike6505 Рік тому

    did india build it though or did they get it from russia/the soviet union

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Рік тому

      India has 2. One Made in India, the other Made in Russia. This one is Russian.

    • @derivativeofintegral656
      @derivativeofintegral656 Рік тому

      It was previously not an carrier but a Battleship Cruiser which was remodeled for Indian Navy.

  • @lieutghost330
    @lieutghost330 Рік тому +5

    Chinese b indian aircraft carrier IAC 1 ko incomplete bata raha hai kya kare kabhi khud ke ghar main jhake dekha nae chale dusro ke ghar main jhakne ke liye

    • @kumarakshat1300
      @kumarakshat1300 Рік тому +1

      🍌🍌

    • @lieutghost330
      @lieutghost330 Рік тому

      @@kumarakshat1300 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @lieutghost330
      @lieutghost330 Рік тому +2

      @Abhijeet Kundubhai bo log bohat complete hai..... 😀😀 isi liye unki rockets asman se girte rahete hai

    • @lavishbansal899
      @lavishbansal899 Рік тому

      vo incomplete bata rahe rahe kyoki abhi unki air wing form nahi hui hai

  • @indiankuttan401
    @indiankuttan401 Рік тому

    The Western world always look down upon the efforts of the non Western world. Now they are also facing similar problems.

    • @deveryhenderson8335
      @deveryhenderson8335 Рік тому

      not really rajesh. you seen, they make their own engines while you send over immigrants over there to drive their taxis and buy their engines. what can you manufacture?

    • @indiankuttan401
      @indiankuttan401 Рік тому

      @@deveryhenderson8335 I am not Rajesh. Whom are you targetting with your response?

  • @prateekdoshi5903
    @prateekdoshi5903 Рік тому

    It is not US Navy it is UK navy

  • @mukulbajpai6190
    @mukulbajpai6190 Рік тому +1

    I'm honestly surprised to hear about Prince of Wales.
    British,as much as we hate to admit, have world class enginnering systems. Even the orginal vikrant has catapult assisted takeoff which we are yet to develop in 2022.
    I hope they find and rectify the problem.

  • @aakashratti
    @aakashratti Рік тому

    Hmm both queens getting old 🤣

  • @oo7bond870
    @oo7bond870 Рік тому

    India should go for nuclear power aircraft carrier like France in small size with technology transfer

    • @derivativeofintegral656
      @derivativeofintegral656 Рік тому +2

      The only benefit that nuclear aircraft carrier seem to provide is that it seems to need virtually no refueling but there is a catch, neither the aircraft on the carrier nor the crew are nuclear powered which means it has to be refueled with the fuel for the aircrafts and supplies for the crew/seamen.

    • @oo7bond870
      @oo7bond870 Рік тому +1

      @@derivativeofintegral656 yes but it will decrease the servicing time and also lay down path for future super carriers which must be nuclear

    • @derivativeofintegral656
      @derivativeofintegral656 Рік тому

      @@oo7bond870 yea but what I meant to highlight was in practical cases apart from pollution and maybe more storage capacity there isn't the kind of day and night difference btwn a nuclear and a diesel powdered carrier.

  • @tyrantfox7801
    @tyrantfox7801 Рік тому

    Vikrant haven't even started it's official duties , why are you so eager to rush to conclusions?

  • @deang5622
    @deang5622 Рік тому +1

    I went to an aviation museum in India, and do you know what I saw there? Mostly British designed aircraft re-badged with Indian logos.
    India has given the world virtually nothing except for cheap clothes and curries and cheap call centre labour which is being brought back to the UK 'cos the Indians aren't any good at it
    . Don't you dare compare India to Great Britain. Remember your history.

    • @debalik8806
      @debalik8806 Рік тому +4

      We do remember our history. We were the Largest Economy in the world with 25% of the world's GDP along with China. Together We had 52% of the Global GDP until the European Thieves came to our shores. We remember the Jalianwala Bagh Massacre, We remember the The Great Bengal Famine, We remember The Atrocities on our Freedom fighters in Cellular Jail, We remember The systematic Destruction of Ancient Sanskrit Universities, We remember The Partition of Our Ancient Motherland into bits & fragments, We remember how NOT So Great Britain stole $45 Trillion from our country. Yet, The British Empire failed to wipe out our cultural identity. We Survived the Catastrophe & We are rejuvenating our Homeland from Scratch. We are not interfering in your affairs because we have no interest to do so but We definitely won't tolerate any lecture from Mass Murdering Tyrants.

    • @deang5622
      @deang5622 Рік тому

      @@debalik8806 I will lecture you and I can do so because I am not the mass murdering tyrant you claim I am.
      Grow up.

  • @SpongeBob-xh8ir
    @SpongeBob-xh8ir Рік тому +1

    INS vikrant is better then this

  • @ayushman476
    @ayushman476 Рік тому

    Britishers take the L

  • @joepessiii6239
    @joepessiii6239 Рік тому

    British...US equipment ko comparison....2022 hay....India is a different country....bass kero slavery mentality

  • @billballbuster7186
    @billballbuster7186 Рік тому

    India up to the same old boasing shit. No comparison between state-of-the-art HMS Prince of Wales and the old 1982 Kiev-Class Soviet leftover Admiral Gorshikov, now INS Vikramaditya. It took 32 years to get this garbage in service due to breakdowns and rising cost.

  • @palakpatel4637
    @palakpatel4637 Рік тому

    Brah get your fact right !!

  • @subhajit201
    @subhajit201 Рік тому

    What is this video for? Look not only Vikramaditya is crap, prince of wales is crap too. Sabash Vikramaditya!!!

  • @ranadeepjash1150
    @ranadeepjash1150 Рік тому

    One note to remember. Our vikramditya never left the indian costal area. It was only deployed to colombo port en route to our Eastern coast. But British aircraft carrier was already deployed to indian ocean and indo Pacific area. Our soviet time aircraft carrier has major issues with engine. Russian engines are not reliable. You mark my words our vikrat is going to be deployed in south indian ocean region 3000/4000 km away from our costal area frequently and it will provide service to the nation than this Russian ship.

  • @samarthpat
    @samarthpat Рік тому

    Kari thi?
    Kar raha hai