17:25 “The interventionists do not approach the study of economic matters with scientific disinterestedness, most of them are driven by an envious resentment for those who’s incomes are larger than their own. For them, the main thing is not to improve the conditions of the masses, but to harm the entrepreneurs & capitalists - even if this policy victimizes the immense majority of the people.”
That's like at the end of 1984 where Winston is told that the general standard of living doesn't matter, it's all about the thrill of the higher-ups stomping on other people's faces for all eternity.- straight out of a spider monkey exhibit at the zoo.
I just came from “Das Kapital.” Feels like a lifetime of political gaslighting to finally claw my way here. It’s all become quite clear now. Mises is the final doorway to me discarding all doubts
@@deirdreberger1363 . Really like Crossroads . So many new things to learn . Plus , Josh's journalistic ethics -- simply impeccable . Always presents the info minus his personal agenda , opinion or narrative . Superb really .
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself, but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” - Sun Tzu
And how is that, when it is the gangsters themselves who create the laws? Only the people gathered to one purpose, in one accord, can restrain the forces that would control or destroy us.
@@CastleHassall Exactly. Makes no sense if the laws are not worth the paper they're written on (e.g. Soros backed DA's in highly Blue cities & states). That's where strong-sometimes tough, when called for-leadership is needed. But, strong rule of law does act as a moral compass and checks and balances against unjust / unwanted behaviors. So I believe "the _rule_ of law" is different than mere "laws," and already implies that their "rule" (enforcement) is strongly enforced.
"No theory, no promises, no morality, no amount of good will, no religion will restrain power. Only power restraints power." - James Burnham, The Machiavellians
@@Freefolkcreatethey literally did that with the constitution. The only law man is subordinate to is that of his creator. Every other right trickles down from there. Anyone who try’s to supplant that hierarchy is a gangster. Wether its a king, a capitalist, or a despondent laborer in rags, no one gets to impose their “plan” on us for any reason.
I just heard Joshua Philipp saying that Russia’s use of Facebook had no hand in the 2016 elections. This surprised me as I had drawn a different conclusion from Zucked by Roger Macnamee. I’m not sure what to believe anymore, any advice please?
@@joemckinley From what is out on the internet, it is natural to be confused. But with time, you - or at least I did - get more and more as to what to believe.
The most important text anyone can read on the machinations going on right now that Josh didn't mention (I'm not sure if he even knows about it), is Tragedy and Hope by Princeton history professor Carol Quigley. It was written in the 60's and outlined exactly how the trans-national Oligarch socialists had consolidated their power up to that point, and how they were going to consolidate their power globally in the future. It describes what we are witnessing today EXACTLY. Since it's 1300 pages I will link to the excellent "cliff notes" if you will: odysee.com/@joe-plummer:b/Tragedy-and-Hope-101:9 Also, if you want the full picture from one of the best investigative journalists of the past 20 years, I highly recommend www.TheCorbettReport.com. He has connected all of the dots to a terrifying degree. It's much, MUCH more serious than Biden simply winning the election, though he is the vanguard of their plans here in the US.
Did Mises inspire you to make your video on Epicureanism? I was reading Human Action, and Mises pointed out that ataraxia and eudaimonia stem from all human action being directed towards removing uneasiness. I suppose that's why both stoicism and Epicureanism effectively preach self-discipline.
Free markets exist when government does not. There is no such thing as a limited government. Just as there is no such thing as a wolf that will not eat sheep.
This is an important part of educating the general public. Adam Smith would be smiling down on you. Each generation needs to go back to the classroom of Economics.
1:21:21 This is exactly the same Russian aggression tactic used in Ukraine today. The justification for Russian aggression in Ukraine is to defend against fascists. The same was true in the 40s, 50s, 60s, etc. The parallel is uncanny and amazing that this book was written in the 1940s and addended in the 1960s. Old is new, again.
@@Dad-GadNATO is not a unified bloc but rather an organization by individual nations who joined willingly, which would render mutual defensive aid to each other in the event of an external force. Contrary to what you’d believe NATO does not exist to deter Russia, but rather to prevent inter European wars. For example: Belgium’s nato guarantee doesn’t exist because of Russia - it exists because of Germany, and France. Russia falsely claims Ukraine is an artificial state yet internationally recognized their borders on multiple occasions. The entirety of Russian history is inexorably linked to the creation of Kyiv by Swedish Rus-folk. You claim the west is weak and incapable of power projection but in the same breath claim that everything negative is due to American influence. Eventually axioms appear and Russia’s degradation to a local/regional power is absolutely visible. If you’re retarded enough to disregard demographic data posted by those nations themselves, you’re going to be in for a very rude awakening when your worldview becomes shattered.
Interesting how capitalists want to regard fascism as a form of socialism, while socialists consider it an extreme version of capitalism. It's the adult version of "I know you are, but what am I."
And your dad told you Santa existed, which was a malicious lie. Giovanni Gentile was the editor at large of Italy's most popular MARXIST publication. He was frequently pictured with his comrades, as a paid up communist party member. I'm looking at 2 years worth of pictures in 1918-1920 when Adolph was wearing his communist party colours. Both socialists. Both of the national variety. Opposing globalism. A national socialism, though fascism and national socialism is different. Black people were in Mussolini's govt. Muslims. Protestants. Catholics. Jews. No camps. A form of ultra national socialism. He opposes religion. There is nothing right wing about fascism or national socialism. The far right is the realm of religious purity and absolutism. An eye for an eye. Ultra conservative is not ultra nationalist. Nationalism is not left or right. Scotland today has a left wing nationalist party, who use ultra socialist idologies. Yes, you heard. I tell you this as someone with a dissertation on Giovanni Gentile, and a former Marxist.
Your only argument will be to lie, and tell me with a straight face that they weren't marxists because Marxism dictates that there is no state. Stalin's Vanguard and Mao's CCP. that's that over already, before you even got a chance to type.
The free market ideal under classical liberalism and libertarianism to the extent these ideologies have been used, are the ”extreme version of capitalism” and fascism is not. The socialists’ prime argument is that ”capitalism will lead to fascism or corporativism”, rather than to equate these ideologies. The fascists’ argument is comparatively simular, namely that capitalism paves the way for socialism by housing the same materialist principles as well as holding simular utilitarian ambitions. Since seperation of powers is likely the most central thesis in the liberal ideology and Socialism and Fascism equally disregard this as fiction, I think if nothing else, we can safely assert that Socialistic and Fascistic views on power are more closely related than either are to Enlightenment liberalism
Thanks for sharing. However, MIses is not pronounced like 'nice' or mice (plural). It is pronounced like in 'niece'. It is Ludwig von *Mieses*. It is a German/Austrian name. But thanks for the job. Hope someone can correct how to pronounce Mises.
27:45 "The only means to acquire power and to preserve in a market economy not altered by a government-made privileges and restrictions is to serve the customers in the 'best' and cheapest* way." Pff, yeah, I guess it's just harder to direct differently all those hundreds of millions of people to value things and obtain them by minimizing the amount of objective and emotional dissatisfaction & disenfranchisement in such a succinct way, right ? There's still some enforcement and restriction left; and requirements (money) to obtain smth can still be lowered, but it's literally that our individual actions would be tied to the requirements and requirements and hardships for everyone else if we get it more easily; everything is freaking tied in, and that' supposed to be "optimal", because we can only think of the government (when it's theoretically/ideally not corrupted nor has a secret agenda) as doing the same action of getting for free in our place, right ? It's the government. And it's 2021. Can't it try to affect the pricing of the companies themselves ? We know how investments can be risky and yet allows for increased purchasing power in the consumer base ever so slightly by giving away money with trust without having immediately/automatically exchanged with smth of equal "value" in the first place, can't the government due these kinds of "investments" of a different nature than getting translating or defaulting those prices to other people ? If it transcends the market ? I'm not convinced on that idea yet, but it sounds like we can do more and have not enough yet, if even just that general idea just above, not even in theory And sure, you could say that Socialist Statism differs from all other forms of authoritarianism in that it intentionally works "for" the people, but not necessarily "by" it, and more directly by taking the responsibility for obtaining needed/demanded goods away from their ability to "earn" it in the however ultimately subjective and changing ways that employees can value whatever activity (i.e. "labour" that you can offer them); which means that your value fluctuates with time, *inherently* , because of others' unchecked changes, and thus can f*** over you over without you even knowing it nor caring; it's not like either the organic/artificial price setters know much about the macroeconomic situation and the status of their consumer base before deciding how to price their objects or to decide what to do in the current quarter and the upcoming ones, and it's not like their "rational actors", same with teh consumers, they might not know as much as they should in order to complete what they need to do in the "democracy" of the marketplace, or to keep the companies sharp, with them being trapped and harmed by their own hubris or complacency...)
I appreciate seeing Antifa larping around demanding the abolition of the entire state, opposing all corporate entities. Fully funded by Black Lives Matter Corporation. 2+2=4 A Woman is an adult female. 😘
Businesses will take advantage of workers at every opportunity, you do need intervention to prevent that. Workers need to be able to have health and safety on the job.
Nope. That's why you need a strong competition, it's the only clear way to avoid worker mistreatment. If owner 1 treats you badly you go to the next one and so forth until you find your place. If you don't l, then it's you who has to change, not the owners
I must warn you that almost everything that he talks about Russia and revolution of 1917 is utter rubbish. Clearly misinformed, poorly simplified and biased veiw, on extremely complex events.
@@DKMperor learn more about Russian revolution 1917. Certainly the most critical event and time in the world history. Very interesting, very shocking, very educational how to prevent that monster from starting. America is doomed now. I was born in Soviet Union and trying to scream about 1917 revolution.
This is the silliest historical revisionism, I can't take this ideologue seriously. Sloppy scholarship, junk premises, hasty inferences, and caricatures of every position that isn't his philosophically puerile individualism.
double negation- His economic theories have already been born out through empirical data and embraced as economic truths, although ignored (never refuted) by Keynesians and Progressives. Instead of offering shrill drive-by commentary, feel free to offer a well-reasoned counter argument. Of course to do that, you will actually have to learn (and be able to understand) what Mises has written. Until then, kindly shut the f**k up and go troll somewhere else.
Great book for the times we live in
2024 and sadly this is truer than ever.
17:25 “The interventionists do not approach the study of economic matters with scientific disinterestedness, most of them are driven by an envious resentment for those who’s incomes are larger than their own. For them, the main thing is not to improve the conditions of the masses, but to harm the entrepreneurs & capitalists - even if this policy victimizes the immense majority of the people.”
That's like at the end of 1984 where Winston is told that the general standard of living doesn't matter, it's all about the thrill of the higher-ups stomping on other people's faces for all eternity.- straight out of a spider monkey exhibit at the zoo.
@@2Hot2 Great analogy.
@@2Hot2”Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”
I just came from “Das Kapital.” Feels like a lifetime of political gaslighting to finally claw my way here. It’s all become quite clear now. Mises is the final doorway to me discarding all doubts
Support me here: www.subscribestar.com/intpworld
0:10 - Introduction
4:35 - Chapter 1: Failure of Interventionism
19:57 - Chapter 2: The Dictatorial, Anti-democratic and Socialist Character of Interventionism
50:14 - Chapter 3: Socialism and Communism
1:19:35 - Chapter 4: Russia's Aggressiveness
1:41:00 - Chapter 5: Trotsky's Heresy
1:56:02 - Chapter 6: The Liberation of the Demons
2:17:43 - Chapter 7: Fascism
2:30:19 - Chapter 8: Nazism
2:41:08 - Chapter 9: The Teachings of Soviet Experience
3:02:50 - Chapter 10: The Alleged Inevitability of Socialism
UFC fighter Renato Moicano sent me here. Its a strange world we live in but I'll take it.
Was surprised to see you do a Ludwig von Mises book! I have really enjoyed it so far.
Jeffrey Gotts have you read this book. If yes can you summarize the book I’m really having hard time understanding it. Thank you
0l.o
@@surajregmi8001 Listening multiple times will likely help.
@@surajregmi8001 Socialism claims it's about liberty and equality but in reality it's just violent repression of liberty.
Arrived here after watching Crossroads with Joshua Phillipp 🏆
Me too!
Same. 😎
@@deirdreberger1363 . Really like Crossroads . So many new things to learn . Plus , Josh's journalistic ethics -- simply impeccable . Always presents the info minus his personal agenda , opinion or narrative . Superb really .
Me too. Arrived here after listening to Joshua Phillips, Crossroads. What a great book!
I came as well. Truly enlightened. It Cleared some things up for me.
Fantastic job! Thank you so much for this reading.
Invaluable book, thank you for sharing
13:42 "All the methods of interventionism are doomed to failure...these policies are therefore contrary to purpose"
I feel we’ve been suffering from interventionalim and it’s now combined with extractionism at the whims of those in power.
@@0711mama Exactly. Interventionism under the guise of Woke intersectionality.
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself, but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” - Sun Tzu
Too long. And boring
@misterman3379
Mate Sun Tzu is the goat. The art of war is probably one of the best philosophy books I've ever read.
@@CloppingIsMyThing read more
Thanks, wish I could get few people I know listen to this.
2:02:02 “It is the rule of law alone which hinders the rulers from turning themselves into the worst gangsters.”
And how is that, when it is the gangsters themselves who create the laws? Only the people gathered to one purpose, in one accord, can restrain the forces that would control or destroy us.
i'd argue that it is enforcement of good laws that counts..
@@CastleHassall Exactly. Makes no sense if the laws are not worth the paper they're written on (e.g. Soros backed DA's in highly Blue cities & states). That's where strong-sometimes tough, when called for-leadership is needed.
But, strong rule of law does act as a moral compass and checks and balances against unjust / unwanted behaviors. So I believe "the _rule_ of law" is different than mere "laws," and already implies that their "rule" (enforcement) is strongly enforced.
"No theory, no promises, no morality, no amount of good will, no religion will restrain power. Only power restraints power." - James Burnham, The Machiavellians
@@Freefolkcreatethey literally did that with the constitution. The only law man is subordinate to is that of his creator. Every other right trickles down from there. Anyone who try’s to supplant that hierarchy is a gangster.
Wether its a king, a capitalist, or a despondent laborer in rags, no one gets to impose their “plan” on us for any reason.
Here from Crossroads with Joshua Philipp
Me too!
Me too
I just heard Joshua Philipp saying that Russia’s use of Facebook had no hand in the 2016 elections. This surprised me as I had drawn a different conclusion from Zucked by Roger Macnamee. I’m not sure what to believe anymore, any advice please?
@@joemckinley From what is out on the internet, it is natural to be confused. But with time, you - or at least I did - get more and more as to what to believe.
The most important text anyone can read on the machinations going on right now that Josh didn't mention (I'm not sure if he even knows about it), is Tragedy and Hope by Princeton history professor Carol Quigley. It was written in the 60's and outlined exactly how the trans-national Oligarch socialists had consolidated their power up to that point, and how they were going to consolidate their power globally in the future. It describes what we are witnessing today EXACTLY. Since it's 1300 pages I will link to the excellent "cliff notes" if you will: odysee.com/@joe-plummer:b/Tragedy-and-Hope-101:9
Also, if you want the full picture from one of the best investigative journalists of the past 20 years, I highly recommend www.TheCorbettReport.com. He has connected all of the dots to a terrifying degree. It's much, MUCH more serious than Biden simply winning the election, though he is the vanguard of their plans here in the US.
I’ve been meaning to watch this. Or rather I should say give it a listen. It is just so well reasoned out.
Great book and a great read (listen). Nice job on reading and recording. Thank you.
Did Mises inspire you to make your video on Epicureanism? I was reading Human Action, and Mises pointed out that ataraxia and eudaimonia stem from all human action being directed towards removing uneasiness. I suppose that's why both stoicism and Epicureanism effectively preach self-discipline.
Just wanted it to keep going. More! More!
Thank you! Let us get Mises out there!
Quality content earns a sub.
Bravo.
You could have told me that this book was written yesterday and I would be none the wiser...
Free markets exist when government does not. There is no such thing as a limited government. Just as there is no such thing as a wolf that will not eat sheep.
I had no Idea this channel was a fan of Austrian Economics. I wonder if they are Libertarian too...
Yea I'm broadly Libertarian
Very well read.
Classic. Read well, also. Thanks.
Thanks to my german economics teacher for opening my eyes on the state.
The more the planners fail the more the planners playing - Ronald Reagan
2024, even more relevant.
This is an important part of educating the general public. Adam Smith would be smiling down on you. Each generation needs to go back to the classroom of Economics.
Who's here after UFC fighter's post fight speech 😂❤
Austrian Economics for the win!
1:21:21 This is exactly the same Russian aggression tactic used in Ukraine today. The justification for Russian aggression in Ukraine is to defend against fascists. The same was true in the 40s, 50s, 60s, etc. The parallel is uncanny and amazing that this book was written in the 1940s and addended in the 1960s. Old is new, again.
Slava Russia 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💙❤️💙❤️
Yea , and NATO has absolutely nothing at all to do with it , or the fact that there's been a conflict ongoing in the Ukraine since 2014 ........
That comment didn't age well did it?
@@Davehatessocialists I’m unsure what you mean. My comment stands. It’s the same tactic of false flag event to enter war.
@@Dad-GadNATO is not a unified bloc but rather an organization by individual nations who joined willingly, which would render mutual defensive aid to each other in the event of an external force.
Contrary to what you’d believe NATO does not exist to deter Russia, but rather to prevent inter European wars. For example: Belgium’s nato guarantee doesn’t exist because of Russia - it exists because of Germany, and France.
Russia falsely claims Ukraine is an artificial state yet internationally recognized their borders on multiple occasions. The entirety of Russian history is inexorably linked to the creation of Kyiv by Swedish Rus-folk.
You claim the west is weak and incapable of power projection but in the same breath claim that everything negative is due to American influence.
Eventually axioms appear and Russia’s degradation to a local/regional power is absolutely visible. If you’re retarded enough to disregard demographic data posted by those nations themselves, you’re going to be in for a very rude awakening when your worldview becomes shattered.
do Man, Economy and State next
I'm here as an anarcho-communist with an open mind, something I wish more people across the political spectrum would be
Well I’m an anarcho-capitalist who just came from “Das Capital” and “ABCs of dialectical Materialism” so there you go.
Anyone know the year this was originally written?
First published 1947. I think this version was updated 1961
@@VoxStoica thanks, I really appreciate your time in replying. 😁🖖
Thanks
Looks like I can't escape MBTI.
Either way, credit to UA-cam for recommending this to me.
1:13:12
2:02:28
13:15
56:00
From UFC to Ludwig Von Mises , who would have guessed eh
Interesting how capitalists want to regard fascism as a form of socialism, while socialists consider it an extreme version of capitalism. It's the adult version of "I know you are, but what am I."
And your dad told you Santa existed, which was a malicious lie.
Giovanni Gentile was the editor at large of Italy's most popular MARXIST publication. He was frequently pictured with his comrades, as a paid up communist party member.
I'm looking at 2 years worth of pictures in 1918-1920 when Adolph was wearing his communist party colours.
Both socialists. Both of the national variety. Opposing globalism. A national socialism, though fascism and national socialism is different.
Black people were in Mussolini's govt. Muslims. Protestants. Catholics. Jews. No camps. A form of ultra national socialism. He opposes religion.
There is nothing right wing about fascism or national socialism.
The far right is the realm of religious purity and absolutism. An eye for an eye. Ultra conservative is not ultra nationalist.
Nationalism is not left or right.
Scotland today has a left wing nationalist party, who use ultra socialist idologies. Yes, you heard.
I tell you this as someone with a dissertation on Giovanni Gentile, and a former Marxist.
Your only argument will be to lie, and tell me with a straight face that they weren't marxists because Marxism dictates that there is no state.
Stalin's Vanguard and Mao's CCP.
that's that over already, before you even got a chance to type.
@@vegvisirphotography5632 Who are you talking to?
@@vegvisirphotography5632 Santa did exist (from 270-343 AD). And your referring to the SNP I suppose?
The free market ideal under classical liberalism and libertarianism to the extent these ideologies have been used, are the ”extreme version of capitalism” and fascism is not.
The socialists’ prime argument is that ”capitalism will lead to fascism or corporativism”, rather than to equate these ideologies. The fascists’ argument is comparatively simular, namely that capitalism paves the way for socialism by housing the same materialist principles as well as holding simular utilitarian ambitions.
Since seperation of powers is likely the most central thesis in the liberal ideology and Socialism and Fascism equally disregard this as fiction, I think if nothing else, we can safely assert that Socialistic and Fascistic views on power are more closely related than either are to Enlightenment liberalism
Thanks for sharing. However, MIses is not pronounced like 'nice' or mice (plural). It is pronounced like in 'niece'. It is Ludwig von *Mieses*. It is a German/Austrian name. But thanks for the job. Hope someone can correct how to pronounce Mises.
Please do Plato and Lao Tzu.
Back in the USSR (United States Socialist Republic).
What's a " Burr• go• see...? "
" Boor• go• see....? "
" Burg• gor• see...? "
" Boo• jew• wah• zee...?
CHAMA 🔥🗿 Money Moicano 💰
Recommended to here from crossroads joshua philip. Last journalist in America.
27:45
"The only means to acquire power and to preserve in a market economy not altered by a government-made privileges and restrictions is to serve the customers in the 'best' and cheapest* way."
Pff, yeah, I guess it's just harder to direct differently all those hundreds of millions of people to value things and obtain them by minimizing the amount of objective and emotional dissatisfaction & disenfranchisement in such a succinct way, right ?
There's still some enforcement and restriction left; and requirements (money) to obtain smth can still be lowered, but it's literally that our individual actions would be tied to the requirements and requirements and hardships for everyone else if we get it more easily; everything is freaking tied in, and that' supposed to be "optimal", because we can only think of the government (when it's theoretically/ideally not corrupted nor has a secret agenda) as doing the same action of getting for free in our place, right ?
It's the government. And it's 2021. Can't it try to affect the pricing of the companies themselves ? We know how investments can be risky and yet allows for increased purchasing power in the consumer base ever so slightly by giving away money with trust without having immediately/automatically exchanged with smth of equal "value" in the first place, can't the government due these kinds of "investments" of a different nature than getting translating or defaulting those prices to other people ? If it transcends the market ?
I'm not convinced on that idea yet, but it sounds like we can do more and have not enough yet, if even just that general idea just above, not even in theory
And sure, you could say that Socialist Statism differs from all other forms of authoritarianism in that it intentionally works "for" the people, but not necessarily "by" it, and more directly by taking the responsibility for obtaining needed/demanded goods away from their ability to "earn" it in the however ultimately subjective and changing ways that employees can value whatever activity (i.e. "labour" that you can offer them); which means that your value fluctuates with time, *inherently* , because of others' unchecked changes, and thus can f*** over you over without you even knowing it nor caring; it's not like either the organic/artificial price setters know much about the macroeconomic situation and the status of their consumer base before deciding how to price their objects or to decide what to do in the current quarter and the upcoming ones, and it's not like their "rational actors", same with teh consumers, they might not know as much as they should in order to complete what they need to do in the "democracy" of the marketplace, or to keep the companies sharp, with them being trapped and harmed by their own hubris or complacency...)
Socialism is capitalism, state owned. All ism's (least of all capitalism) are compromised by hypocrisy/corruption)
Like Idiotism and Wokeism nowadays
I appreciate seeing Antifa larping around demanding the abolition of the entire state, opposing all corporate entities.
Fully funded by Black Lives Matter Corporation.
2+2=4
A Woman is an adult female. 😘
Narrator mispronounces "von Mises" in first ten seconds. I believe "Mises," correctly pronounced, should rhyme with "cheeses".
I thought the opening of this book was about the Democrat Party in the 21st century.
America in 2020.
r
Businesses will take advantage of workers at every opportunity, you do need intervention to prevent that. Workers need to be able to have health and safety on the job.
Guessing you don't run a business then.
@@Qingeaton www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/this-day-in-history/triangle-shirtwaist-fire-in-new-york-city
@@Qingeatonof course not. Every schmuck that hasn't run a business has the same reply.
Nope. That's why you need a strong competition, it's the only clear way to avoid worker mistreatment. If owner 1 treats you badly you go to the next one and so forth until you find your place. If you don't l, then it's you who has to change, not the owners
I must warn you that almost everything that he talks about Russia and revolution of 1917 is utter rubbish. Clearly misinformed, poorly simplified and biased veiw, on extremely complex events.
Got an example??
How is he wrong? genuinely curious
He is still working on his comment it appears.
@@DKMperor learn more about Russian revolution 1917. Certainly the most critical event and time in the world history. Very interesting, very shocking, very educational how to prevent that monster from starting. America is doomed now.
I was born in Soviet Union and trying to scream about 1917 revolution.
@LanaW123 what books would you recommend?
This is the silliest historical revisionism, I can't take this ideologue seriously. Sloppy scholarship, junk premises, hasty inferences, and caricatures of every position that isn't his philosophically puerile individualism.
double negation- His economic theories have already been born out through empirical data and embraced as economic truths, although ignored (never refuted) by Keynesians and Progressives. Instead of offering shrill drive-by commentary, feel free to offer a well-reasoned counter argument. Of course to do that, you will actually have to learn (and be able to understand) what Mises has written. Until then, kindly shut the f**k up and go troll somewhere else.
@@patricksachs3655 you seem REALLY upset...
@@doublenegation7870 Not at all. Just giving your comment the respect it deserves.
@@patricksachs3655 settle down, dude. It's only the internet... take a deep breath.
"double negation" alright. Let's have those examples then?