Q-Timex Falcon Eye Reissue - Is The Beauty Skin Deep?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 285

  • @BensWatchClub
    @BensWatchClub  Рік тому +2

    Timex Falcon Eye (affiliate link): fave.co/3LmyGqW

  • @CalixaCal
    @CalixaCal 3 роки тому +71

    This is the most beautiful BLUE dial I've ever seen.

  • @jorgebarrerat
    @jorgebarrerat 3 роки тому +47

    The Falcon is the most original from the blue dial Q Timex, it has more personality like you said.

  • @theonelion
    @theonelion 3 роки тому +41

    I love the close-ups you do of the watches and the fact you point out when the second hand does or doesn't hit the mark is just good to know imo. Solid review man.

  • @jannilsson5872
    @jannilsson5872 3 роки тому +13

    ALL regular Quartz movements misses some indices if not equipped with some sort of correction. It could be a break, like in Grand Seiko 9f, or it could be a magnet in the seconds wheel like in the Omega 1538B (based on ETA255.461). Other quartz calibers with separate engines for the hands will have less of a play (like many cheap Casios). With knowledge comes understanding I like to think :)

  • @johnhanson5527
    @johnhanson5527 3 роки тому +4

    I got this watch @ $90! Found a site trying to clear out inventory and I love it!! Seriously the bracelet is insane!

  • @jevgenijivanov6824
    @jevgenijivanov6824 3 роки тому +9

    Super that Timex and Tissot starts produsing vintage quartz models - I like it!
    It would be super if Seiko will make 70s King Quartz and Grand Quartz

  • @SirLoinOfsteak85
    @SirLoinOfsteak85 3 роки тому +144

    I don't know how difficult it is to align a watch correctly, but I do know Seiko finds it completely impossible.

    • @motlay
      @motlay 3 роки тому +26

      I've found Casio nails it fairly consistently.

    • @paulandrews7622
      @paulandrews7622 3 роки тому +6

      motlay........ Agree !! Casio usually spot on !!

    • @MrMadvillan
      @MrMadvillan 3 роки тому +24

      if you know even a little about watchmaking youll understand that it’s quite difficult especially if you’re mass producing for affordability. There are ways to mitigate bounce but then you still have to regulate every watch that goes out and whoever cases the movement has to again align the movement. You then have to hope it doesn’t get jostled around in shipping bc a lot of parts are friction fitted. In a way that’s why mechanical watches are satisfying, because you don’t see that second hand is missing marks. I’d say if seconds not hitting bugs you, get a mechanical watch.

    • @SirLoinOfsteak85
      @SirLoinOfsteak85 3 роки тому +1

      @@MrMadvillan Makes sense. Seiko can't even align rehauts though... 😉

    • @MrMadvillan
      @MrMadvillan 3 роки тому +10

      @@SirLoinOfsteak85 yes bc seiko doesn’t do a rehaut, rolex does that. You’re talking about a dial ring or dial chapter ring good troll tho.

  • @ElectricBlakeGames
    @ElectricBlakeGames 3 роки тому +24

    Cool looking watch, good to know its bigger than size, as my wrist is the same size as yours

  • @MrOstefar
    @MrOstefar 3 роки тому +11

    Thanks for a good review as always Ben. I actually had one of the original ones in mint condition, bracelet (afaik MUCH worse than this reissue) and all. Not easy to forget this dial and case. If my mind serves me well, the crystal was faceted. Wouldnt run after a battery change and got junked... was about 15 years ago when Timex wasnt expected to rise again, and the watch itself was worthless. The in house Timex movements were rather low end. If I had known what I know now, I probably would have done some more work to make it running...

  • @sirravens
    @sirravens 3 роки тому +12

    Great review. Totally agree on quartz ticking second hands missing markers - so frustrating... I struggle to buy three-hand quartzes for this reason. Disagree on acrylic crystals though: prefer these to domed mineral crystals as you can just polish out the scratches - sapphire obviously better but won't give the same look.

  • @miguelschoedel7691
    @miguelschoedel7691 3 роки тому +3

    I love you’re honest and real reviews.

  • @GabrielGGabGattringer
    @GabrielGGabGattringer 3 роки тому +5

    The Falcon Eye is the only "Q" i would buy. And I still havn´t got one. Love the blue dial!

  • @cougarbatterie
    @cougarbatterie 4 місяці тому +1

    I agree with you Ben when the second's hand doesn't hit the markers. It's simply annoying 😩

  • @Watchilluminator
    @Watchilluminator 3 роки тому +4

    Fully agree in the mentioned "issues" . A not matching second hand for example is annoying, or the disparate marker(s). Thanks for your review! However I ordered one today because of Cybermonday -30% ... so I paid 125 € at the end of the day, well knowing - from other reviews where they talked about their wrist size ;) - the watch will fit my wrist and even with the small
    issues it looks great. btw: The lume plays no role for me.

  • @LymanPhillips
    @LymanPhillips 3 роки тому +3

    I love that 70s style handset and hour markers. And the dial is nice as well. If I could get it at a decent price, I'd be tempted.

  • @michaelhargis7036
    @michaelhargis7036 3 роки тому +5

    That is an amazingly attractive watch. If they offered it In a 40/42mm I'd own one for sure. It's nice to see more Watch channels and reviewers shining some love on Timex. They're trying to get back into the game but they need to step it up just slightly. I for one am re-discovering my love for Quartz movements, again. Great review 👍

  • @PK-pc8yz
    @PK-pc8yz 3 роки тому +2

    When in need for a funky retro vibe, I simply put a Vostok Amphibia (420 or 710) on my wrist. A trustful automatic watch, with much beter quality control then the Falcon eye.

  • @MrMadvillan
    @MrMadvillan 3 роки тому +2

    I believe the lug design is referred to as _hooded_ And was fairly popular in the late 60 through the 70s. I have a few seikos with a similar lug. The timex has a hooded lugs but also a similar profile as the king seiko 45 where a cylindrical body is held by sculptural rails. This watch additionally reminds me of the seiko advan and ks specials which had a flamboyant styling, usually a colorful dial but also I believe the original movement was _ElectroMechanical_ . This meant it had a battery powered balance wheel and ticked more like a mechanical watch. Judging by Seiko Elnix and EL330/370 which we also electromechanical the original timex would have set you back many more hundreds, i’m guessing. Also pressed clasps were standard back then with even rolex having press, folded hollow bracelets. I think the timex falcon is prob the coolest and unique looking watch for the price. too back electromechanical isn’t done anymore.

  • @radovan1690
    @radovan1690 3 роки тому +3

    I was surprised to see that yours came in a basic box. When I bought mine it came in the regular q series box, but with a style on the inside that was unique to that specific watch itself.

  • @iainb1577
    @iainb1577 3 роки тому +4

    Those lugs manage to stop a beautiful dial from being on a desireable watch. I would genuinely be tempted, had it conventional lugs and accurate alignment.

    • @HGX1
      @HGX1 3 роки тому

      Agreed, it's beautiful in pictures but when you see it on a wrist it's pretty awkward looking. They should create a variant with traditional lugs or the same case style as the Tissot prx.

    • @jakekaywell5972
      @jakekaywell5972 2 роки тому

      @@HGX1 Nope. Fully retro angular case all the way!

  • @topx1674
    @topx1674 Рік тому

    Bought this watch after your review , bought it so cheap in sale , and this looks so freaking good on wrist and when the sun hits it , it shine like crazy , i have got compliments on this watch , people asking me what watch is that lol 😂🤣😂 .

  • @SerialWheeler
    @SerialWheeler Рік тому +1

    This needs to be $100 tops. Great review!

    • @Groesjeboy
      @Groesjeboy Рік тому

      I'm reviewing it again since its 99 euros at a Dutch outlet watch website

  • @Jaycelestra
    @Jaycelestra 3 роки тому +4

    The bracelet is actually beautiful! I have no problem wearing this type even with my hairy wrist 🤨

    • @paulwilliams5013
      @paulwilliams5013 3 роки тому +1

      agreed, ..and it's not the end of the world to shave your wrist in the watch area.

  • @djbethell
    @djbethell 2 роки тому

    Alignment is a continuous issue with Timex watches - I had to send two Waterbury watches back because of this and it's made me wary of buying from Timex ever again. This video has confirmed why I won't be a returning customer. Their bracelets are impossible to remove links from too.

  • @jerperderp
    @jerperderp 3 роки тому +1

    That Yu-Gi-Ho reference hit me hard. Good old days!

  • @karlroberts580
    @karlroberts580 3 роки тому +1

    I thought this watch was that cool that I bought one. I’ve not actually worn it yet, so I can’t comment on the the QC issues yours had Ben. My packaging was different though. Mine came in the higher end long thin box which my Marlin came in which is a bit nicer than the budget box you got. Bought this one definitely for the stunning blue dial and got it just under £110 in the 11.11 sale on the Timex website. I like the looks so much I also bought a vintage example too which I’m refurbishing.

  • @pegasodave
    @pegasodave 3 роки тому

    Some may have issues but I have had so many positive comments (especially from girls) you need to buy one -great value !!!!

  • @BosunM8James
    @BosunM8James 3 роки тому +1

    I don't normally gripe about misaligned second hands on quartz watches because it's fairly common with quartz movements. However, for a $100+ watch, I'd expect that second hand to line up with those marks.

  • @valengreymoon5623
    @valengreymoon5623 3 роки тому +2

    That case is very similar to the Grand Seiko 5645-8000. The bracelet is fairly close as well, aside from the clasp.

    • @fedomandez
      @fedomandez 3 роки тому

      My Lord Matic has a similar case (8060). I love it. Especially due to the faceted glass

    • @valengreymoon5623
      @valengreymoon5623 3 роки тому +1

      @@fedomandez Ah yes, I know the one. Always did like those hidden lug cases.

  • @patriotsquill
    @patriotsquill Рік тому +1

    A manual winding version of this watch would be amazing...

  • @counterpoint1494
    @counterpoint1494 3 роки тому +3

    My falcon eye came in a special box and packaging. Interesting yours didnt. I did get mine much closer to release tho

  • @Trex100
    @Trex100 3 роки тому +5

    It’s flawed, but looks freaking great in your footage.

  • @martintanz9098
    @martintanz9098 3 роки тому +3

    One of the first watches I ever owned as a child was a Timex Quartz, though not this model. Anyhow, I might consider it for around $100 but probably not at full list price of $179. I am actually fine with the watch being Quartz, and I really like how easy battery changes will be. I also like the acrylic crystal for a vintage vibe. However, I remember how much those cheap bracelets sucked, and would prefer something a little nicer. But at the right price, I could see myself changing out the bracelet for a nice leather strap, or even maybe a mesh bracelet.

  • @igorR061
    @igorR061 3 роки тому +1

    I have a Waterbury and a expedition, on both, seconds hand are really annoying to look at and really loud, but both are extremly accurate. Those reissues are kinda overpriced for what it offers, but they look nice, if Timex could improve the watch or over charge a bit less. I got the Q with coke bezel this black friday, closer to a "fair price".

  • @justme7920
    @justme7920 3 роки тому +2

    Orient Tristar comes with a blue dial and fits true to size.

    • @p_drizzle123
      @p_drizzle123 3 роки тому

      it's also not a complete piece of garbage!

    • @justme7920
      @justme7920 3 роки тому

      @@p_drizzle123 well it’s mechanical and costs half the price.

  • @davidstewart3868
    @davidstewart3868 3 роки тому +15

    Sorry Ben, but for that price I’ll get a Seiko, Casio or Citizen. The “new” reissued Timex watches just don’t impress me.

  • @TehBeckman
    @TehBeckman 3 роки тому

    I've purchased this watch straight from Timex, for much more money. But for me, at least, it did come in a much more 'retro' box. Long flat box that had some plush satin lining, it was pretty nice.

  • @mattsmiley8156
    @mattsmiley8156 3 роки тому

    Bangin video Ben. Was itching to pull the trigger on this. I don't have anything against quartz, but when the second hand misses the indicators this much...I just can't. Spot on video. I love that dial, though. Would be nice to see one with a miyota or seagull automatic/manual. But, it doesn't look like that will happen. It's a shame. I got a great deal on a 34mm Marlin on Amazon. Keep up the great work. Cheers.

  • @rick3670
    @rick3670 3 роки тому +1

    Interesting that, at approximately the 8:47 mark in this video, when pointing out the misalignment of the second hand? You showed a side-by-side comparison with a Seiko equipped with no markers, neither hour nor minutes. I’m aware that you were apparently underwhelmed with this particular piece, but a comparable quartz (anything by Casio) might’ve been a bit more apropos. Great review, all points both positive and not so positive, well covered. Thanks!

    • @alexandersmith855
      @alexandersmith855 3 роки тому

      I agree with the no marker dial makes any comparison shaky at best, though I would note the Timex Qs have Seiko movements. Best comparison would probably be a Lorus

  • @neilurwin9670
    @neilurwin9670 3 роки тому

    Brilliant Watch All The Best Of Health To You And The Wonderful Timepiece.

  • @HarryBunnGRVOTV
    @HarryBunnGRVOTV 3 роки тому

    100% agree re the movement, a better quality one with 3 tic’s per second would be great and I probably would have gone for one.

  • @nintendokings
    @nintendokings 3 роки тому +4

    Was not expecting a Yu-Gi-Oh card featured in this video

  • @breaktime3269
    @breaktime3269 3 роки тому

    Thanks Ben, really enjoyed your video, lovely watch, really good point about the second hand. Best regards

  • @bolchert
    @bolchert 3 роки тому

    This is one attractive watch. I love blue dial watches and the original design here. I would certainly pick one up, just not for that price tho.

  • @justinruffner8717
    @justinruffner8717 3 роки тому +10

    The watch is beautiful tho

  • @neilpiper9889
    @neilpiper9889 2 роки тому

    The only Timex I have liked is the Timex Marlin reissue with a Seagull St6 handwound mechanical movement. Beautiful, but at 34mm too small for me. It would suit you Ben.

  • @NathanChisholm041
    @NathanChisholm041 3 роки тому

    That's a nice Timex! They have been putting out some awesome watches of late. I recond this would look good on my 8 in wrist. Cheers

  • @raytsh
    @raytsh 3 роки тому

    Looks like the second hand actually alignes with the markers, great stuff!

  • @mrbacchus6127
    @mrbacchus6127 3 роки тому +4

    I can't knock it too hard for the seconds hand missing the indices. I just came off a video where a Longines vhf conquest was even farther off.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 3 роки тому

      LOL, last night I watched a video where a guy discovered a brand new misaligned Rolex Submariner!

  • @TomasWatchReviews
    @TomasWatchReviews 3 роки тому +1

    man, I wish you would make reviews more often..

  • @hashnlg
    @hashnlg 3 роки тому

    Great comparison to Pokémon cards Ben, your videos are great! Keep up the good content.

  • @201950201950
    @201950201950 3 роки тому +3

    That is one of the most attractive looking watches I've ever seen too bad it's only good as a movie prop.

  • @nicsamazingpinballchannel7688
    @nicsamazingpinballchannel7688 3 роки тому

    Spot on. The dial is attractive in a ridiculous way... but the poor seconds hand alignment, tinny bracelet (which will not work unless your wrist is at least 7"), and acrylic crystal makes it feel more like a novelty than a keeper for the asking price.
    I ended up selling mine. It's a fun look, but it wasn't quite able to justify a lasting spot in the watch box.
    A more enjoyable retro-cheap trio: Casio A168WA-1, Luch one hand (ZN version), and Armitron Griffy LED. All three for less than a Falcon, with enough left for lunch and a brew.

  • @danailhristov7617
    @danailhristov7617 3 роки тому +1

    Please do a review of that Citizen!

  • @jmmartin7766
    @jmmartin7766 3 роки тому

    As I was just commenting on another channel, this watch looks awsome. And it may very well be worth the price...
    But I have difficulty paying $100+ usd for a *Timex* (even a nice-looking 'retro' design) when, for a little less to a little more money, I can have a Seiko, Citizen, Pulsar, Bertucci, etc. with better features (like Eco Drive) and reputation.
    I think Timex has forgotten what made them a successful watch company in the first place: INEXPENSIVE, reliable watches!

  • @UsernameInvalidTHIS
    @UsernameInvalidTHIS 3 роки тому +1

    Nah, I hate the misalignment thing too. Wouldn't bother replacing a watch over it though. Caveat emptor.

  • @3rdstone1
    @3rdstone1 3 роки тому

    Great review as usual. I think it looks great, but the the price is a bit steep for what you get.

  • @Eu-ft8qj
    @Eu-ft8qj 2 роки тому

    Hi ben! Is your hour hand perfectly aligned??

  • @el_puma_real
    @el_puma_real 3 роки тому +2

    I want to love Timex, I really do. I’ve had my fair share of Timex watches in the past and with all of them there is always a few constants, 1. They’re loud 2. The seconds hand rarely lines up with the indices, and 3. Most of their watches use an acrylic crystal. Other than the brand name and Indiglo, there’s nothing but cheaply made, mass produced schlock. Great review.

  • @glenh4971
    @glenh4971 3 роки тому

    That was a good review. I like your attention to detail. The Timex brand reminds me of my childhood when I bought my first Timex watch. Timex needs to work on getting their quality up a little. I just bought a Casio Edifice watch for 100 dollars that I like much better than the watch in this review. My edifice model has analop and digital with no second hand which I actually prefer.

  • @varanid9
    @varanid9 3 роки тому

    Beautiful watch. Since it's so cheap, and, everybody should own a Timex, I may get it. Problem is, the dial is very similar to my Yema Superman Heritage blue, and, frankly, I'm personally not a big fan of this thing's case design, though I appreciate what Timex tried to do here.

    • @spa2damax
      @spa2damax 2 роки тому

      Get a Marlin if you want one Timex. Best imo

  • @tmossify
    @tmossify 3 роки тому

    i would buy it just to take the dial and put it in a different case with maybe a different movement

  • @AM-zk7pj
    @AM-zk7pj 2 роки тому

    I liked the watch.. its size is perfect! But you said it right beauty is skin deep.
    That crystal, lug width And bracelet big turn off... 🤷
    I later found the seiko SUR344P.. that is exactly I needed! And is a perfect replacement of this watch

  • @_Grensgeval_
    @_Grensgeval_ 3 роки тому

    That's a beautiful blue colour!

  • @mr_dances
    @mr_dances 3 роки тому

    Looks fine on your wrist on the outdoor shots. I love the look of this watch, but the price point is a bit too steep for my liking. $100 is where I draw the line for quartz, and Timex offers great watches at that mark.

    • @mr_dances
      @mr_dances 3 роки тому

      @@watchesandcaps2566 to be honest, I haven't collected that many watches to begin with. I've only started it to buy automatics, even those are inexpensive. I do have a couple of quartz watches that I enjoy wearing though, my Casio being my daily and a Timex Fairfield chronograph as a good weekend watch. I guess I am still new as a collector but I enjoy gleaning information from Avid collectors like yourself.

  • @travislivengood2744
    @travislivengood2744 3 роки тому

    I deeply wish Timex could make movements that didn't sound broken and find a way to align the seconds tracks. I've given them three different tries and just keep being let down. that and perhaps stepping away from base metal cases and press fit case backs completely.

  • @888rogermoore
    @888rogermoore 3 роки тому

    I had one when they came out. Have it to my brother. Pretty but stopped working and it had a new battery. Now it’s living in a drawer

  •  3 роки тому

    Ben! when are you gonna critique the old fashioned orient tristar line?

  • @gori277
    @gori277 2 роки тому

    Very useful review. Subbed!

  • @mostirreverent
    @mostirreverent 3 роки тому

    I still have my original, the one with the silver and gold bracelet

  • @frazzl
    @frazzl 3 роки тому +2

    I have seen plenty of Tag and Tissot quartz watches where the seconds hand regular misses the markers. Want good alignment, Casio is the way to go!

  • @Ashfielder
    @Ashfielder 3 роки тому

    I was very tempted to pick up the watch, but I’m afraid the strap won’t adjust small enough for me.

  • @thomasflynn5366
    @thomasflynn5366 3 роки тому

    I love everything about this....except for the price. I'm thinking $75. The acrylic is in keeping with the retro look. If it scratches just polish it.

  • @haping1
    @haping1 3 роки тому

    Nice warch, but beside the misalignements, you can see the glue dots from the logo on the dial. Missed chance from Timex.

  • @Jonathan_wow
    @Jonathan_wow 2 роки тому

    One of the most crazy dials

  • @Eugen.
    @Eugen. 3 роки тому

    Why don't you try the Orient Neo 70's ( UG1U004V )? It's basically Orient's version of the Q-Timex idea. Would love to see a video comparing this Falcon Eye with the Orient Neo 70's (purple dial) because both of them are new vintage quartz watches at around 100usd, with very similar looks.

  • @briandd27
    @briandd27 2 роки тому

    It's much more recommended to get an original Falcon Eye. I have an original blue Falcon Eye and I love it.

  • @chrisr8112
    @chrisr8112 3 роки тому

    Beautiful dial, however over priced or under speced, you choose but it’s definitely one of them

  • @johnhanson5527
    @johnhanson5527 3 роки тому

    Btw idk if he mentions it but wearing this watch the seconds misalignment is less noticeable due to the distortion the crystal creates.

  • @PK-pc8yz
    @PK-pc8yz 3 роки тому +1

    Great vid!

  • @cadburries
    @cadburries 3 роки тому

    Hi Ben, please could you do a review on the DUFA watches that are sold on Amazon? Thank you!

  • @embl236
    @embl236 3 роки тому

    I think this watch is stunning but not worth the price. But I would love other watches making dials like this....(Btw keep up the good videos!)

  • @Cleatus546
    @Cleatus546 11 місяців тому +1

    I'll stick with the great affordable Invictas

  • @DanaTheInsane
    @DanaTheInsane 2 роки тому

    Sounds about perfect for my wrist.

  • @motaman8074
    @motaman8074 3 роки тому +37

    I'm a Timex fan, but I feel the whole Q line is overpriced.

    • @OmarZ77
      @OmarZ77 3 роки тому +6

      I feel like they will go down in price with time, or at least I hope so. The Mk1 line also started off in the $90-100 range. Now they’re going for $28.

    • @motaman8074
      @motaman8074 3 роки тому

      @@OmarZ77 hope so

    • @Cleatus546
      @Cleatus546 11 місяців тому +1

      Considering the "quality" I would expect it to be priced at around $30.00 or so.

    • @sultanqasim7639
      @sultanqasim7639 8 місяців тому +1

      I agree, I just bought the LCA. Its a beautiful watch but I think I can justify its price (maybe at like 100 instead of 149) because it’s the only one on the market other than that Casio LF20W that has that LCA display.

  • @OwynDavies
    @OwynDavies 3 роки тому +3

    Nice Ben! Like every Timex Q reissue its overpriced; don't be fooled. Looks great but ridiculous money for what you get.

    • @damyr
      @damyr 3 роки тому +1

      I agree. It should cost 50% less.

  • @ionz75
    @ionz75 3 роки тому

    This watch would be an instant buy at about half the price point. Alternatively, give it a sapphire crystal and a smooth-sweeping movement and I'd gladly pay full price.

    • @jakekaywell5972
      @jakekaywell5972 2 роки тому

      Sapphire crystal, yes, but the movement should be quartz with the beat quartz is famous for. The Timex Q line was created specifically for that back when quartz technology was a new, luxurious thing after all.

  • @hankbannister
    @hankbannister 3 роки тому

    I got a "Henry of London" from Amazon for less than 80 € with a beautiful blue dial. Of course it's chinese, but I really like the blue dial with the golden elements. And it even has a real moonphase window, that tells me, that today is full moon :-)

  • @MammothBehemoth
    @MammothBehemoth 3 роки тому

    I actually like that strap. What is that called?
    If that Q didnt had concealed lugs, I might consider it. That's what bothered me for some reason

  • @marsoelflaco5722
    @marsoelflaco5722 3 роки тому +1

    Nice watch, but Timex seems to fall "just short" when it comes to their retro and quartz watches. I'd like to see sapphire crystals, better bracelets/leather straps, and 100 meter water resistance. That would increase the price, but these features would make the watches more competitive and appealing to consumers.
    Long live the Timex Ironman.✌🏽👍🏽

  • @Xanduur
    @Xanduur 2 роки тому

    Acrylic is EASY to polish out. I think the blue should have the silver accents and the green should have the gold accents.

  • @RossWristWatchLove
    @RossWristWatchLove 3 роки тому +1

    Nice video bro.

  • @Sandipan_Naskar
    @Sandipan_Naskar 3 роки тому

    Should I buy it as an investment?
    Please reply

  • @cosmicpig351
    @cosmicpig351 3 роки тому

    3 beats per second and I would probably buy it

  • @wynandnathaniel9972
    @wynandnathaniel9972 3 роки тому

    Hi there Ben, it's not your OCD kicking in. I hate it as well when markers don't get it properly! Did you got my email regarding the review of a Brunmontagne watch? It's a up and coming Dutch brand. Let me know!

  • @mat314159mat
    @mat314159mat 2 роки тому

    I would totally buy it if it was mechanical (with adequate pricing)

  • @AliasEveWatches
    @AliasEveWatches 3 роки тому

    Shame about all the other things because that dial is beautiful

  • @TheMasonator777
    @TheMasonator777 3 роки тому +3

    Is there a watch guy that isn’t OCD? Why else would you be obsessed with precision time instruments?

    • @laus7080
      @laus7080 3 роки тому

      I have actual OCD and I do not worry about minute details and pricision in watches as much as Ben does, I value artistic direction and overal look over tiny details. But I'm used to people misusing my diagnosis.

  • @haybob2527
    @haybob2527 3 роки тому

    You can't go wrong with a Beautiful Blue Dial...