Love this. Now my understanding is so much better on the atom. And about carbon 14, I'm interested in archaeology and wondered how the dating worked. Now in understand. Great lesson!
This and your other lectures makes us feel easy to enter, but suggest there is more depth and extention, and above all , the fact that the teacher is really interested in teh topics it makes them so attractive. You never sounds dismissive of detail or the elementary.
Many thanks for reading alot of literature review and providing information on the experiments that were done and more new insights. This is exactly the absolutely correct way of teaching and if a student learn this way, there are high chances of becoming a better researcher. It was never taught in school this way and that’s why was hard to follow- was more like mug it up! Many thanks for your efforts. From Germany.
Excellent video - as are all your videos. Very illuminating. I love re-learning all this - plus, for me, you fill in a lot of blanks - things I never really understood. One point, at 38 mins. - don't you mean that this nucleus has 6 neutrons? Atomic mass (12) subtract the protons (6) equals 6 neutrons. Perhaps I misunderstood.
Question (from a classically trained electronics technician): If a proton has a positive charge, and an electron has a negative charge, then wouldn't a neutron be negative with respect to a proton, and be positive with respect to an electron? I have always looked at voltage or current (or impedance or resistance or whatever) as being linear and am assuming that atomic 'charges' are in that realm of understanding. Does an item--like a neutron--have a charge value equal to zero, or is it's electromagnetic signature simply halfway between that of an electron and a proton? I am having trouble grasping the concept that an item, any item, can have no electric or electronic identity, since everything exists within a field, or fields.
Jason first let me thank you For these great videos ! My question is are the electrons also spinning on there axis while there in there wave motion and is the nucleus also in a wave at the same time with the electrons?
HELLO MR SORRY I DON'T KNOW YOUR NAME BUT YOU EXPLAIN VERY CLEAR BECAUSE MY ENGLISH IS NOT SO GOOD BUT I UNDRESTAND YOU VERY WELL I CONGRATULATE YOU 🙂🤝👍👍👍👍👍
Hello teacher. you mentioned that the mass is focused mostly in the nucleus. But then at 33:22 in this video, you show that the mass of the Proton and Neutron (which we simply call "1AMU ") is many, many more times LESS massive than the electron. This doesn't make sense if the mass is supposed to be focused in the nucleus? I didn't understand this part. :( Thanks for making these excellent videos; they are extremely helpful for me. :)
I’m not sure exactly what you’re referring to. I looked at that time in the video and I see that I wrote down that the proton and a neutron are very close to 1 atomic mass unit and the electron was 5.48x10^-4 amu. This is much smaller. It’s the same as 0.0005486. amu.
@@MathAndScience Aaaah, I see this. I apologize; I had the same confusion as the other commenter here. It makes sense now. I need to be more careful and take things more slowly. Thanks a million! :)
It can but it isn’t as abundant as regular hydrogen because it isn’t as stable. It’s called deuterium and the nucleus has 1 proton and 1 neutron: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium
I thought the same thing! The mass of the Proton and Neutron (which we simply call "1AMU ") is many, many more times LESS massive than the electron. This doesn't make sense if the mass is supposed to be focused in the nucleus? I didn't understand this part. :(
@@AirwavesEnglish My comment was in response to the comparison of the size of the atom to that of the nucleus, where he stated that the nucleus was a million times larger diameter than the diameter of the atom itself. (See frame 11.25) Again, 10^-4 is a million times larger than 10^-10 - - ( 10^-10 X 10^6 = 10^-4 )
I mean this with the greatest respect but I think you need to watch the video in slow down a little bit and write down the numbers that I’m writing down. I think you’re getting confused between Ångströms and meters and also confusing that with what I say later in terms of mass which is atomic mass units. These are all different units and I’m very clear with what I’m saying but I think you’re kind of mixing them up and getting confused.
I think you’re confusing Ångströms and meters. Please go take a look at that part of the video again. An Angstrom and a meter are totally different things
I’m not sure where you’re getting this, when you look at when I talk about the mass I’m very clearly stating that the electron is many thousands of times less massive than the proton and I write that on the board. I think you might be confusing the size of the atom with a mass of what goes inside of the Atom, I know there’s a lot of stuff going on but I think if you watch again a little slower you’ll understand.
Good lessons but take a breath, you talk like a rifle on full auto. Your enthusiasm is great but you jump all over the subject making it harder to make concise notes. Please stop saying little balls- we get it and it’s irritating.
I don’t mean no harm and you are a good teacher but you do a little too much talking and implementing irrelevant information (cork and so much more unneeded info) too much information can confuse a person and they loose the actual concept. Less is more sometimes. I care to hear about what’s relevant to the topic. You get thrown off topic too often. I’m nearly confused when I’m done watching your videos. Please try to stay on topic and less is more
![The Discovery of Atomic Structure (Chemistry & Physics) - [1-2-5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jeDP200x-HE/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Discovery of Atomic Structure (Chemistry & Physics) - [1-2-5]](/img/tr.png)
![What is Atomic Mass & Mass Defect on the Periodic Table? - [1-2-9]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XLCupmUZimY/mqdefault.jpg)
Absolutely incredible... As a student of chemistry can't thank you enough sir
Ditto! ❤🎉
You’ve made me fall in love with Math & Science! Binge watching all your content, thank you!!!
Awesome! Thank you!
You are one of the best chemistry teachers. God bless you.
Yilma Wako from the USA, though born and grew up in Ethiopia.
Love this. Now my understanding is so much better on the atom. And about carbon 14, I'm interested in archaeology and wondered how the dating worked. Now in understand. Great lesson!
You have a gift of teaching! Thank you sir.
You are a brilliant teacher. You made chemistry easy.
Jason thank you so much for these videos, you are the sole reason i am going to get through college chem
Excellent way of teaching and lecture delivery style 🎉
Watching from 🇳🇬 Nigeria 🇳🇬
Same 😭😭
This and your other lectures makes us feel easy to enter, but suggest there is more depth and extention, and above all , the fact that the teacher is really interested in teh topics it makes them so attractive. You never sounds dismissive of detail or the elementary.
Many thanks for reading alot of literature review and providing information on the experiments that were done and more new insights. This is exactly the absolutely correct way of teaching and if a student learn this way, there are high chances of becoming a better researcher. It was never taught in school this way and that’s why was hard to follow- was more like mug it up! Many thanks for your efforts.
From Germany.
Great lesson. Excellent lecturer.
Many thanks!
You're a brilliant teacher. Thank you so much.
Watching from 🇳🇬 NIGERIA 🇳🇬❤️
Though We studied all these things, Thanks, On your teaching , I understood many versions what we have been learning somewhat wrong.
Excellent video - as are all your videos. Very illuminating. I love re-learning all this - plus, for me, you fill in a lot of blanks - things I never really understood. One point, at 38 mins. - don't you mean that this nucleus has 6 neutrons? Atomic mass (12) subtract the protons (6) equals 6 neutrons. Perhaps I misunderstood.
Yes! I misspoke. Thanks!
I observed it also 🤦
You are such a wonderful teacher. Thank you so much!!!
Always following you from Liberia
You are the one I love to watch always
Very very useful lessons, I've already started to apply this knowledge in practical life,
Little confusion in buying the courses
Such a nice way of teaching
I love the “flavor” correlation 39:25 I’ll definitely remember what an isotope is now
Love this! Thank you so very much sir
Great perseverance.....Sir..Thank you very much indeed. Great job.
, Thank
Welcome!
thank you ! amazing! most informitive, usefull and encouraging of questioning why: explination of anything i have heard ,maybe ever.
Love your videos studying them because I start chem 1020 in two weeks.Your teaching is superb Sir! Also think you meant 11 here 46:35 lol
Very well explained. Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge 🙏🏻 love from India 🙏🏻
Can u put these vids In an order and make a playlist
You are incredibly good!
Watching today from Zimbabwe
Thank you for your good work
Thank you for helping me in Biology!
Happy to help!
Waiting from south Sudan 🇸🇸
Question (from a classically trained electronics technician): If a proton has a positive charge, and an electron has a negative charge, then wouldn't a neutron be negative with respect to a proton, and be positive with respect to an electron? I have always looked at voltage or current (or impedance or resistance or whatever) as being linear and am assuming that atomic 'charges' are in that realm of understanding. Does an item--like a neutron--have a charge value equal to zero, or is it's electromagnetic signature simply halfway between that of an electron and a proton? I am having trouble grasping the concept that an item, any item, can have no electric or electronic identity, since everything exists within a field, or fields.
REALLY, I LEARNED FROM YOU TOO MUCH
THANK YOU VERY MUCH 🙂🙂🙂🤝👍
Très belles explications.
Thank you so much for this
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
NUCLEAR PHYSICS & CHEMISTRY IS INTERESTING...!!!
Monica ogiji watching from Nigeria 🇳🇬 and Mr Jason I love u
I love ur lecture
More grace and wisdom sir
I wish I can have a personal lesson too
dude you are awesome
So thankful for u
Watching from DRC
Your videos are an addiction
48:00
Jason first let me thank you
For these great videos !
My question is are the electrons also spinning on there axis while there in there wave motion and is the nucleus also in a wave at the same time with the electrons?
thanks you Sir
Superb
HELLO MR
SORRY I DON'T KNOW YOUR NAME
BUT YOU EXPLAIN VERY CLEAR
BECAUSE MY ENGLISH IS NOT SO GOOD
BUT I UNDRESTAND YOU VERY WELL
I CONGRATULATE YOU 🙂🤝👍👍👍👍👍
Nice 👍
The teacher you didn't have in high school.
Every nice 👍👍👍
Thanks for ❤❤
Hello teacher. you mentioned that the mass is focused mostly in the nucleus.
But then at 33:22 in this video, you show that the mass of the Proton and Neutron (which we simply call "1AMU ") is many, many more times LESS massive than the electron.
This doesn't make sense if the mass is supposed to be focused in the nucleus? I didn't understand this part. :(
Thanks for making these excellent videos; they are extremely helpful for me. :)
I’m not sure exactly what you’re referring to. I looked at that time in the video and I see that I wrote down that the proton and a neutron are very close to 1 atomic mass unit and the electron was 5.48x10^-4 amu. This is much smaller. It’s the same as 0.0005486. amu.
@@MathAndScience Aaaah, I see this. I apologize; I had the same confusion as the other commenter here. It makes sense now. I need to be more careful and take things more slowly. Thanks a million! :)
@@AirwavesEnglish No need to apologize at ALL - very happy to help!
Please I want to ask a question ❓
" thank you so much teach you're amazing teach"
Thanks so much!
So why doesn't hydrogen have a neutron in its atom?
It can but it isn’t as abundant as regular hydrogen because it isn’t as stable. It’s called deuterium and the nucleus has 1 proton and 1 neutron:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium
@@MathAndScience im aware of hydrogen isotopes, so why isn't normal hydrogen stable?
Are you great ♥️
You are!
How people knows that hydrogen has only one electron in its atom or helium has two ???
Good review and fills in spaces not covered before. Thank you very much.
Atom
🇮🇳👳indian student here 🇮🇳
Go back and recheck your math - 10 to the -4 power is 10 to the +6 LARGER than 10 to the -10 power.
I thought the same thing! The mass of the Proton and Neutron (which we simply call "1AMU ") is many, many more times LESS massive than the electron. This doesn't make sense if the mass is supposed to be focused in the nucleus? I didn't understand this part. :(
@@AirwavesEnglish My comment was in response to the comparison of the size of the atom to that of the nucleus, where he stated that the nucleus was a million times larger diameter than the diameter of the atom itself. (See frame 11.25) Again, 10^-4 is a million times larger than 10^-10 - - ( 10^-10 X 10^6 = 10^-4 )
I mean this with the greatest respect but I think you need to watch the video in slow down a little bit and write down the numbers that I’m writing down. I think you’re getting confused between Ångströms and meters and also confusing that with what I say later in terms of mass which is atomic mass units. These are all different units and I’m very clear with what I’m saying but I think you’re kind of mixing them up and getting confused.
I think you’re confusing Ångströms and meters. Please go take a look at that part of the video again. An Angstrom and a meter are totally different things
I’m not sure where you’re getting this, when you look at when I talk about the mass I’m very clearly stating that the electron is many thousands of times less massive than the proton and I write that on the board. I think you might be confusing the size of the atom with a mass of what goes inside of the Atom, I know there’s a lot of stuff going on but I think if you watch again a little slower you’ll understand.
If nucleus are SO strong, how come protons are SO far away, vibrating outside with a football field of space away from center??
Thank you sir ✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧
What does electrical charge mean....what does it mean when they say a proton is positively charged and an election is negatively charged?🙁
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
👍🌷❤👍
Good lessons but take a breath, you talk like a rifle on full auto. Your enthusiasm is great but you jump all over the subject making it harder to make concise notes. Please stop saying little balls- we get it and it’s irritating.
I don’t mean no harm and you are a good teacher but you do a little too much talking and implementing irrelevant information (cork and so much more unneeded info) too much information can confuse a person and they loose the actual concept. Less is more sometimes. I care to hear about what’s relevant to the topic. You get thrown off topic too often. I’m nearly confused when I’m done watching your videos. Please try to stay on topic and less is more
Arm chair quarter back...I love this guy s teaching method....you need to stop criticizing him and go to another site
Your videos are an addiction