KPK, there is going to be population Collapse from 2040 onwards. The population growth is becoming negative in certain countries, for example in China and Japan. Global population is going to be below 5 billion by 2200. Don't worry about population.
Technology lo,law and order political system lo sophistication korukuni annintlo manaki animals ki teda undali ani cheppi ee vishayam lo matram animals laagane undali ani cheppe feminist(not RGV )hippocrisy ki naa hatsoff🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌,RGV enduku ledu ante his reason for saying so is different
Not according to the law. You can get a divorce if you and your wife don't agree. But, the ultimate right lies with the wife. The honourable Supreme court has clearly stated that.
RGV is missing a logic here, abbayyi cheppinattu kanali ante adi rape avuthundi anedi correct kaadu endukante rape means just forced sex… whether it leads to pregnancy or not is a secondary issue. Forced sex(rape) lo pregnant aithe ammayyi ki full right untundi whether to give birth or abort But Unforced sex(consensual sex) lo if pregnant aithe then if at least one of the mother/father says that be baby be born then baby must be born. It is a fundamental right of the parent asking for it & fundamental duty of the other parent to not stop it. This is not rape. RGV in some topics in a hurry making statements before thinking all scenarios.
It's you who missed the point of discussion, my friend. You are talking about what happens AFTER consensual sex. RGV basically was saying that wife can't be mentally forced to EVEN HAVE SEX for the purpose of having children. And you are wrong even according to your own logic. All women, married or unmarried, entitled to safe and legal abortion till 24 weeks of pregnancy, ruled SC. The Supreme Court ruled that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion and that the distinction between married and unmarried women in this matter is unconstitutional. And the honourable Supreme Court is currently considering criminalising marital rape as well. Individual liberty is to be given highest priority, except in a few exceptions. If one wants children and the wife doesn't, one can't force the wife to have sex. He should simply divorce her and get married to someone who wants to have children as well. One always has the option of divorcing if such a big difference of interests arises between the couple. In India, divorce is treated like a taboo, and those who get a divorce are ill treated in society, so people are conditioned to think they have a right to demand children from their wife. That was the point RGV was trying to make in the end. It can be grounds for husband to get a divorce if wife aborts a child without consent of the husband. You can only get a divorce but you have no FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to force your wife to have sex for the purpose of children or force your wife to give birth in an unwanted pregnancy according to her. If one pushes his wife for sex to ultimately have children when she doesn't want to, it can be an act of cruelty and be the grounds for divorce from the wife's side. And it can be an even bigger crime, if and when the honourable SC moves in the direction of criminalising marital rape. You have missed the point of RGV completely by assuming that consensual sex has already taken place.
RGV is right person to deal with any questions
KPK, there is going to be population Collapse from 2040 onwards. The population growth is becoming negative in certain countries, for example in China and Japan. Global population is going to be below 5 billion by 2200. Don't worry about population.
Technology lo,law and order political system lo sophistication korukuni annintlo manaki animals ki teda undali ani cheppi ee vishayam lo matram animals laagane undali ani cheppe feminist(not RGV )hippocrisy ki naa hatsoff🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌,RGV enduku ledu ante his reason for saying so is different
Humans will eventually be living lonely as technology cannot express emotions amd future remains dark.
అది భార్య భర్త... ఇద్దరూ కలిసి తీసుకోవలసిన నిర్ణయం.
I agree with u
Not according to the law. You can get a divorce if you and your wife don't agree. But, the ultimate right lies with the wife. The honourable Supreme court has clearly stated that.
RGV Rocks🔥👍
చెప్పాలంటే ఈ టాపిక్ నాకు నచ్చలే but
RGV గారు ఉన్నారు కాబట్టి చూసా...
Ippudu Em cheddam antav
RGV 🔥🔥💪🔥💪
Inko 5 videos rgv tho chesi Meru celebrity anchor ipotaru sir
Rgv rocks.
aantha badhagaa vuntey 4 mukkalu cheyyachugaa indiani
At 10:30 starts the theory
Verma ఏం నాలెడ్జ్రా నీది, నువ్ అసలు కేక. ఎక్సట్రీమ్ లెవెల్ థింకర్
)?(i)?(భారం+బాధ్యత=భూమి)?(i)?(
RGV is missing a logic here, abbayyi cheppinattu kanali ante adi rape avuthundi anedi correct kaadu endukante rape means just forced sex… whether it leads to pregnancy or not is a secondary issue.
Forced sex(rape) lo pregnant aithe ammayyi ki full right untundi whether to give birth or abort
But
Unforced sex(consensual sex) lo if pregnant aithe then if at least one of the mother/father says that be baby be born then baby must be born. It is a fundamental right of the parent asking for it & fundamental duty of the other parent to not stop it. This is not rape.
RGV in some topics in a hurry making statements before thinking all scenarios.
True bro...
Bro lord of the rings bauntadha
Parents Asking for a baby is not a Fundamental right brother u r missing
It's you who missed the point of discussion, my friend. You are talking about what happens AFTER consensual sex. RGV basically was saying that wife can't be mentally forced to EVEN HAVE SEX for the purpose of having children. And you are wrong even according to your own logic. All women, married or unmarried, entitled to safe and legal abortion till 24 weeks of pregnancy, ruled SC. The Supreme Court ruled that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion and that the distinction between married and unmarried women in this matter is unconstitutional. And the honourable Supreme Court is currently considering criminalising marital rape as well. Individual liberty is to be given highest priority, except in a few exceptions. If one wants children and the wife doesn't, one can't force the wife to have sex. He should simply divorce her and get married to someone who wants to have children as well. One always has the option of divorcing if such a big difference of interests arises between the couple. In India, divorce is treated like a taboo, and those who get a divorce are ill treated in society, so people are conditioned to think they have a right to demand children from their wife. That was the point RGV was trying to make in the end. It can be grounds for husband to get a divorce if wife aborts a child without consent of the husband. You can only get a divorce but you have no FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to force your wife to have sex for the purpose of children or force your wife to give birth in an unwanted pregnancy according to her. If one pushes his wife for sex to ultimately have children when she doesn't want to, it can be an act of cruelty and be the grounds for divorce from the wife's side. And it can be an even bigger crime, if and when the honourable SC moves in the direction of criminalising marital rape. You have missed the point of RGV completely by assuming that consensual sex has already taken place.
Which Indians Watches South Korean Dramas & Music?
It's just Absurd
Bore topic...
Neeku kodku vundali sir