The Godfather Part 2 (1974) Reaction! Best sequel of all time! NO CAP!!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • hey guys! finally did the Godfather 2 and what else can we tell you besides what you see in our reaction! For half of the movie, we were totally confused, and although we kinda got a hang of how Michael thinks yet he does so many things that blow our minds. Our brains were definitely challenged in this movie! Joy throughout the movie didn't even recognize that the young Vito was Robert de Niro! 😅
    For full-length or unedited reactions,
    👉 / mjoy4fun
    -----------------------------------------
    ➡ MJoy4Fun is an interracial couple from Romania and the Philippines. We mainly post reactions and vlogs on our channel! if you enjoyed this video, leave us a comment below! 😊
    -----------------------------------------
    Enjoyed this video? check our PLAYLISTS!!!
    War Film Reactions: • War Film Drama Reactions
    GOD OF WAR SAGA: • Playlist
    League of Legends: • Playlist
    Overwatch Animated Shorts: • Playlist
    World of Warcraft: • Playlist
    Tales of Runeterra: • Playlist
    Diablo: • Playlist
    Assassin's Creed: • Playlist
    Apex Legends: • Playlist
    Follow us on:
    Facebook: mjoy4fun

КОМЕНТАРІ • 699

  • @citypopFM
    @citypopFM 2 роки тому +273

    I don't think Michael mistreated Tom by excluding him from certain aspects of the business, I always felt he was protecting him from the darker parts of it. Michael loved Tom like a brother.

    • @LeviAckerman-cb5ji
      @LeviAckerman-cb5ji 2 роки тому +39

      Yes! But on a smaller scale, Tom was much more valuable to Michael as his lawyer than his consigliere.

    • @harish123az
      @harish123az 2 роки тому +50

      The book makes it clear it was Vito's idea and not Michael's. And reason for that was that they were planning to go legit. They didn't want Tom Hagen's name connected with anything shady because when they went legit, he would be their main guy for everything

    • @citypopFM
      @citypopFM 2 роки тому +16

      @@harish123az Yeah, I didn't read the book but by the first film's end, they made noise about going to Vegas and being legit, but you explained it perfectly. It's funny to think as massively successful as Godfather was, the studio balked at the idea of a sequel and never intended to make it happen. In those times, they thought a sequel would be a dud because "nobody wants to see the same story twice."

    • @chriskelly3481
      @chriskelly3481 2 роки тому +13

      He also needed Tom unsullied in order to be the new, legitimate face of the family. It was a HUGE position of trust and responsibility, especially for someone who wasn't "family"-family (even if still an adopted brother).

    • @johnnyskinwalker4095
      @johnnyskinwalker4095 2 роки тому +7

      Yes! by keeping Tom outside Mike was protecting him. And in many ways Tom could never betray him because of it.

  • @michaeljames6817
    @michaeljames6817 2 роки тому +89

    Vito didn't actually want a truce. He said there was a truce as long as he was alive, but he was planning their deaths with Michael the whole time, for when he died and Michael took over. The ending of Godfather 1 was just as much Vito's plan as it was Michael's.

  • @LeviAckerman-cb5ji
    @LeviAckerman-cb5ji 2 роки тому +467

    I think Michael would have been far better off if Apolonia had lived. She had a better understanding of old world Sicily. Having been directly affected by war, poverty, vendettas, and organized crime, Apolonia would have understood Michael in a way Kay never could. The two would have had at least 4 kids by now. She would have kept her family firm and strong throughout the chaos, the way Michael's Mom had done.

    • @natedoggg2002
      @natedoggg2002 2 роки тому +35

      I agree!

    • @MrAitraining
      @MrAitraining 2 роки тому +62

      Appolonia dying was the biggest hit to the family dynasty. She would have pumped out kids for michael non stop and not challenge him regarding his business.

    • @MrRondonmon
      @MrRondonmon 2 роки тому +6

      No, because the writer would have just brought here over to the USA and Michael would have been the same, LOL. After all, he was the writers vision, but I understand your point, in the real world if he was a REAL PERSON.

    • @vinniemoran7362
      @vinniemoran7362 2 роки тому +21

      Firstly, Michael would've been bored with Apollonia within a year. Secondly, Kay is the one who knew the real Michael. The real Michael never wanted to be godfather after all. Michael was working to make the Corleone family legitimate, so he could be done with this Mafia life. But all he was doing was losing more and more of his soul and humanity.

    • @LeviAckerman-cb5ji
      @LeviAckerman-cb5ji 2 роки тому +73

      @@vinniemoran7362 Firstly, Kay never knew the real Michael. She never truly knew his upbringing, his lineage, or the inner workings of his mind. How could she, when not even he knew? Apollonia was far closer to him because they have the same old country heritage, values, and traditions.
      The main reason he returned to Kay was his yearning for a family of his own. But he never got over losing Appolonia.
      Secondly, no way would Michael have been bored with Apollonia within a year, like some FWB he met through Tinder.
      He followed the old tradition of courtship which in itself took months. That combined with their time of marriage was already well over a year.

  • @steven2640
    @steven2640 2 роки тому +150

    Michael inherited his father's intelligence but didn't inherit his heart. No doubt this is in part because Vito came from nothing and could understand the hardships of everyday people while the Corleone children grew up with everything. Vito put a lot of faith in Michael to do better than him but would be disappointed to see how ruthless Michael has become and the destruction of the family.

    • @LuckySmurf
      @LuckySmurf 2 роки тому +2

      Kindness must skip a generation for Corleone men.

    • @michaeljames6817
      @michaeljames6817 2 роки тому +15

      I think part of it is due to trauma from WW2. He was a decorated war hero iow he killed a lot of people before joining the Mafia.

    • @gunkulator1
      @gunkulator1 2 роки тому +20

      Vito's heart is what almost gets him killed and makes him lose control of the family. He wouldn't do business with Sollozzo because he thought his business was too dirty. Michael himself was good hearted until his father was almost murdered. The Godfather saga shows how organized crime eventually robs you of your humanity. Those who try to stop the fall get killed or pushed aside.

    • @khalidamajoud4114
      @khalidamajoud4114 2 роки тому +2

      @@michaeljames6817 Interesting point.

    • @azizmooshoolov8922
      @azizmooshoolov8922 2 роки тому +1

      Michael also had it all put on him in short order, in addition to the fact he never wanted to be involved until his father was nearly assassinated.

  • @kmcleod31721
    @kmcleod31721 2 роки тому +98

    I always loved the flashback and the final end shot of Michael. Michael had achieved so much more than his father in regards to wealth, power and influence but in the end he lost EVERYTHING that was important to his father. A final shot of one of the most powerful men on the planet, but isolated and alone. A family reduced to tatters.

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +20

      that's the price everyone could pay running after material things... Family, Love, Peace with God can't be bought with money... a Person who believes in God would say ''He did too much and lost everything'' but someone who doesn't believe in God would say ''he didn't do enough, and he complains about the years he lost trying so''

    • @Kenny-ep2nf
      @Kenny-ep2nf Рік тому

      it's definitely a consequence

  • @petresko1041
    @petresko1041 2 роки тому +41

    They brought Frank's brother into court to make him remember that you *never* go against family. If you did that in Sicily you would become an enemy to the family and his brother gave him that stare "Are you really going to go against the most sacred union we've honored for generations?".
    By bringing him Michael prevented Frank from testifying and breaking the code in front of his own family.
    Also you probably didn't notice, when hugging Fredo, Michael gave his right-hand man the look "Now's the time".

    • @rich_t
      @rich_t 2 роки тому

      They brought him there to give the message that if Pentangelli testified his brother would be killed.

  • @sirhoopalot1
    @sirhoopalot1 2 роки тому +44

    Vito commands respect while Michael rules by fear. The film juxtaposed the rise and fall of the family empire.

    • @sandranorman6451
      @sandranorman6451 Рік тому +4

      Think if Appolonia had lived, Michael’s life would have been a lot easier.

    • @crowfeedreactions
      @crowfeedreactions Рік тому

      Nope. Vito also ruled by fear. We see him after a lifetime of killing and putting down his enemies (almost all off-screen, except for his first kill). He was willing to share the spoils with other families, but then they got too ambitious and thought they would take it all. They were almost successful and would have been if not for Michael saving his father's empire.

    • @rosiii9
      @rosiii9 10 місяців тому

      ​​@@crowfeedreactions right? I don't understand that respect bs people talk about, Vito was feared as well, and he also acted for his own interests, not only for the family, to me the events that happen in the second movie are also his fault, he created an empire but didn't properly prepare any of his children and when he died everything went downhill because the one brother who had stayed out of the business his whole life had to take over, if the things that happened to michael (a brother's betrayal, the abortion) had happened to Vito he would have had the same reactions, you can't preach "family" when Michael killed Fredo and not do the same when Fredo betrayed Michael which could've resulted on his death, that's hypocrite

    • @messii648
      @messii648 7 місяців тому

      Vito’s calmness made them fear and respect him, he was really wise while Michael was young and all crazy compared to him but he changes as a person as he got older in the third but his past’s mistakes catches him up sadly

  • @Sunsets330
    @Sunsets330 2 роки тому +53

    I've been binge watching your channel the last couple of days and I have to say you guys are one of the best reactors on youtube. Your reactions are always honest and genuine with insights that are thought provoking. Thanks.

  • @midknightmiddleman5887
    @midknightmiddleman5887 2 роки тому +19

    This was a great movie. They showed us Vito’s life to contrast it with Michael’s. Vito was poor, but built his way up. He became powerful, but it wasn’t money that made him powerful. He made endearing relationships with people and he was respected. Michael, however, is a powerful figure. He’s got other powerful people by his side. But he’s not respected. He’s feared. Slowly, the people he loves and trusts are evaporating from his life

    • @crowfeedreactions
      @crowfeedreactions Рік тому +2

      This is not correct. Vito also ruled by fear. I guess everyone just forgot that the people who supposedly respected Vito so much tried to assassinate him in the street! :) Which is what set this whole thing off. Vito had respect for the number of years he had been in the business. But it only takes a few ambitious people to turn all that around. Michael, too, would have the same level of respect if he made it to his father's age and was still in the business. But we see Michael at a different point in the journey, when there are threats all around. We don't really see Vito's life in the Mafia, other than the beginning and the end. The middle probably looked much like Michael's life looked like.

  • @adamshame8980
    @adamshame8980 2 роки тому +34

    listening to the two of you analyzing the plot twists and evaluating Michael was so refreshing , i have seen this series literally dozens of times but watching your reaction brings a revitalization to an old favorite . thank you so much .

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +7

      Wow, thank you! we were quite scared to release our inner instinct towards commenting during reactions... we thought many will dislike it... but you are amoung couple of people who really like it! thank you

    • @adamshame8980
      @adamshame8980 2 роки тому +4

      @@MJoy4Fun your reactions come across as honest and sincere and that is what puts your channel up there with the best of the reaction channels ,this is not meant as a compliment only fact . i don' believe you two have any idea how much fun you bring to your audience, we are the ones who should be saying THANK YOU

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +3

      @@adamshame8980 you left us without words!! thank youuuu!!

  • @soulseer1191
    @soulseer1191 2 роки тому +5

    Al Pacino performance here is amazing, one of the best acting on history and he deserve the Oscar

    • @michaelceraso1977
      @michaelceraso1977 2 роки тому +3

      He absolutely deserved the Oscar, and hard to believe looking back that ART CARney won, ARt was fine but that was not even in the class of A Pacino

  • @mrkelso
    @mrkelso 2 роки тому +11

    You both pay better attention and in discussing the movie, you two "get it" better than any other reaction channel I have seen. It is truly a pleasure to watch. Thank you.

    • @isabelsilva62023
      @isabelsilva62023 Рік тому +2

      And they stop and do not talk over the dialogue of the movie, that is a rare thing among reactors.

  • @clarencewalker3925
    @clarencewalker3925 2 роки тому +5

    The man who portrayed Hyman Roth is Lee Strasberg. He's an acclaimed acting teacher and coach and taught nearly every actor in the movie.

  • @m.ericwatson968
    @m.ericwatson968 2 роки тому +36

    Really liked watching this with you two, seen it a dozen times but it's great to see others pick up the nuances; Michael was not like his Father after all, whom was a man of respect and who cherished family, not just his own but all families from the old country. Michael turned to violence, terror and revenge and isolated himself from his family and lost all his only trusted friends, he became emperor of a crime empire he inherited yet he himself becomes responsible for tearing it down from the inside.

    • @lethaldose2000
      @lethaldose2000 2 роки тому +4

      We don't see Vito being truly ruthless in 1933 during the Post Prohibition war. Which eventually created the 5 families of New YOrk. This is what Godfather 3 was supposed to be, but it got sidelines and Coppola eventually decided to finish the story of Michael Corleone instead.

  • @pliny8308
    @pliny8308 2 роки тому +16

    It was never Frank Pantangelo who was the traitor, and Michael never thought it was. He just wanted him to tolerate the Rozzato brothers because he wanted to stop Roth from thinking he was on to him. The Rozzato brothers just told Frank it was Michael who ordered his death to torture him mentally before killing him.

    • @frantaf
      @frantaf 2 роки тому +5

      That line confused everyone.

    • @rich_t
      @rich_t 2 роки тому

      I think it was done more to throw off the audience.

    • @crowfeedreactions
      @crowfeedreactions Рік тому

      @@rich_t It's weird, but I wasn't ever confused by that line. It was a kiss-off line. I never once thought Michael was ordering Frank to be killed. Frank was obviously loyal and you could tell that because he always said what he thought and never held back on Michael. A traitor would be more slippery, less confrontational in order to ensure he wasn't looked upon as a possible threat (like Michael was to Hyman Roth, for example).

  • @roymerritt9927
    @roymerritt9927 2 роки тому +7

    The man Michael looked at when he was embracing Fredo was his main bodyguard Al Neri who in the novel was a former Italian-American policeman who had taken the law into his own hands and was fired from the police department. And in the scene it clearly shows Michael after his mother's death was now designing to murder his brother for his betrayal. After his troubles with the police Neri turned ruthless and went to work for the mob. The actor who portrayed him Richard Bright was a longtime acting colleague of Al Pacino who had been in performances opposite Pacino numerous times when they were struggling actors. The most notable of them was "The Panic in Needle Park" an earlier vehicle in which Pacino revealed his great talent. He died in Feb. 2006 at the age of 68 when a tour bus struck him in a crosswalk in the upper west side of Manhattan. He most often played thugs, cops, drug addicts and other desperate New York types.

  • @innocentbystander1853
    @innocentbystander1853 2 роки тому +6

    I am Italian-American and grew up watching The Godfather & The Godfather II with my family so many times. I know both movies word by word, inside and out and I have to say that you both did a great job reacting to both movies and figuring out the story as well as understanding the characters. Bravo!

  • @windsaw151
    @windsaw151 2 роки тому +13

    Gratulations that you immediately knew how Michael realized Fredo was the traitor. You would be surprised how many viewers missed that passing comment. (myself included I have to admit)

  • @LanceJ.
    @LanceJ. 2 роки тому +6

    I love your reactions. I like how you pause the movie to talk instead of talking over the dialogue. Can’t wait to see more movies with you.

  • @juliell2139
    @juliell2139 2 роки тому +30

    Many say that when Michael showed up with Frank's brother, Frank changed his story to save his brother's life. I don't believe that. I think it was more that his brother was brought to show his intense shame at his brother being a rat. In the mafia, the law of "omerta" was king. Everyone went by it. It was a code of silence. It was meant that no one ever testifies or rats to the cops. Always look the other way. It was the unspoken rule. And Frank was breaking it. His brother was like "What the hell are you doing, Frank?". I don't believe it was like, "We have your brother and will kill him". Frank changed his story due to the shame.

    • @kristopherevans6283
      @kristopherevans6283 2 роки тому +6

      Absolutely!

    • @johnscott4196
      @johnscott4196 2 роки тому +3

      Agree

    • @bigounce5893
      @bigounce5893 2 роки тому +2

      No I believe micheal wouldn't hesitate to put a hit on both of em because he killed his own brother. But I do belive on the other topic as well in Sicily the mob truly uphold the oremta as their pride of loyalty so if and when micheal makes up his mind Frankie's whole family could be shamed back in Sicily.

    • @SissouLoveVideo
      @SissouLoveVideo Рік тому

      @@bigounce5893 Yeah I think it was a bit of both

  • @billyrayvalentine5079
    @billyrayvalentine5079 2 роки тому +5

    Michael needed Apollonia in his life. He would have easily been a family man and happy with her and would have easily been able to be warm to others. Her death just turned him completely cold and calculating. Great reaction guys!

  • @Griegg
    @Griegg 2 роки тому +23

    Michael came back from Sicily for three reasons: 1. Apollonia was killed in a booby trap set for him. 2. He had been warned already that his enemies knew he was there and it was too dangerous to stay.
    3. He knew Sonny had been killed. He had to come back to help what was left of his family.
    As for Kay, he didn’t love her. He needed her.

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +5

      can't say it better! Michael had Balls i'll give him that. sad story for Kay... but she saw how he was.. she had a choice.. when he almost like beg her to marry him, she had a choice

    • @lunamilo2065
      @lunamilo2065 2 роки тому +2

      Michael to Kay: “You were all that I loved & valued MOST in the world. I still love you Kay, don’t dread me. Every night I dream about you and how I lost you.”
      Al Pacino: “Michael loved Kay when he met her and he loved her throughout his life and he loves her to this day. He not only loved her but also admires her.”
      Random Internet clown Griegg: “Michael never loved Kay.”

    • @Griegg
      @Griegg 2 роки тому +3

      Michael didn’t marry Kay until he needed her. She bought his lies, knew how to behave, and could bear him children. That last quality of hers came in handy when his wife had been killed.
      Apollonia never would have had an abortion, or protested “this Sicilian thing…” Neither would have her Sicilian family.
      I didn’t read the book, but the book is irrelevant because the film is being discussed here, not the book.
      The first two films, masterpieces both, were the only ones of significant value. No additional sequels were needed or intended.
      Pacino does in fact love
      Keaton, but Michael disowned Kay for her abortion in the second film. That not love; it’s bitter and permanent resentment.

    • @lunamilo2065
      @lunamilo2065 Рік тому

      @@Griegg Yikes. Mike was already engaged to Kay at the beginning of the movie and novel. The characters are based on the novel and you are talking about something that happened in the first movie. Only a moron would say it is irrelevant to the movie. That quote was about Kay and Michael from Pacino. Has nothing to do with Keaton. Just admit you are wrong.
      How about you Mario Puzo and Coppola mentioning that Kay is Michael’s one true love in the script, screenplay and interviews? Will you believe then? After all you are an Internet rando and you surely wouldn’t insist to know more than the author, director, actor and the character himself? If you do then you are delusional. Already proved so by trying to dismiss what is said in the movie by Michael himself and then by Al Pacino in an official interview. Just say you were wrong and go.

  • @joannevincent2035
    @joannevincent2035 2 роки тому +3

    My parents were just like Michael and Kay - dad was 1st generation Sicilian-American, mom was Scots-Irish-American Wasp from a Kentucky dirt farm. They also met at the very end of WWII. The culture gap was immense - the marriage was a phenomenal failure ending in divorce after 17 years. Puzo and Coppola captured a very sad but true dynamic in the aftermath of the war.

  • @tiredoffools8929
    @tiredoffools8929 2 роки тому +9

    Definitely one of the greatest sequels ever made. It is arguably the best but can be debated by a handful of other sequels. Aliens (1986) , Terminator 2 (1991), and The Empire Strikes back (1980) as well.

  • @jmichaelbell5434
    @jmichaelbell5434 2 роки тому +4

    Beautiful! Watching you watching Godfather 2 gave me the same glorious feeling of watching it again, for the very first time!
    Hands down, the most genuine and thoughtful reaction to this classic I’ve watched and I’ve watched many many. 5-star

  • @rodglasgow1643
    @rodglasgow1643 2 роки тому +35

    It was enjoyable watching intelligent people react to this intelligent movie. The Godfather trilogy involves the viewer in the complex world of these criminal organizations with their plots and plans within plans. Your debates and speculations about what was going on and why were reasonable and just like what many of us did when seeing it for the first time. The rise and fall of Michael Corleone is a great modern tragedy and a gripping story. Thanks for the genuineness of your reactions. Hope your channel continues to grow.

  • @Betts711
    @Betts711 2 роки тому +2

    Ok, I already know what should be printed on your T shirts and hoodies merch once you start it up - “Game Over”! Lol 😝 You guys are fun to watch!

  • @emilytrott
    @emilytrott 2 роки тому +2

    When Michael was in the bedroom looking out what he saw was the flash of light from the guns being fired. It travels much faster than the bullets. With his combat experience from the war he immediately hit the deck and crawled to cover. I don't know if at relatively close range like this must have been, whether there would be time to duck before the bullets came through the window, but that is what he saw.

  • @Onezy05
    @Onezy05 2 роки тому +1

    Fredo's lifeless body in the bobbing boat with the golden horizon in the background... forever one of my favourite movie shots.
    It looks as if it was taken straight from a painting.

  • @joetidd2178
    @joetidd2178 2 роки тому +11

    You guys are great, I love your reactions. It's so cool to see the younger generation discover how great these movies are. Keep up the good work!

    • @MFV030
      @MFV030 2 роки тому +1

      I was born in 95 and i’ve been watching/studying these flicks since i was about 12 years old .

  • @TTM9691
    @TTM9691 2 роки тому +5

    I love the way you guys react and discuss stuff, debate stuff. You both have great eyes and ears, and even when you're wrong about where you think the movie is going to go, it's always interesting what you are thinking!

  • @Oscar44443
    @Oscar44443 2 роки тому +7

    Michael had to become what he became for the family to stay and grow in power the most intriguing character in The series

    • @crowfeedreactions
      @crowfeedreactions Рік тому

      Exactly. Michael became EXACTLY who he needed to be in order to save the family. It's not what he wanted, it's not what his father wanted for him, but he was the only choice after Santino was killed and he took up that burden and he did his job. Truly heroic.

  • @MJ-we9vu
    @MJ-we9vu 2 роки тому +20

    Another great reaction by you guys. I love how you both bounce ideas off each other to figure out the intricacies of what's happening (although I might be throwing popcorn at you if you did it in a theater 😃). You're fun to watch because you get it. About Fredo. If you remember in the first movie when Michael went to Las Vegas to try to force Moe Green to sell his casino Fredo defended Green. Michael warned Fredo never to take sides against the family again. That's how you knew Fredo was doomed after Michael found out he was the traitor. John Cazale, the actor who played Fredo, had an interesting, although ultimately tragic life. He died of lung cancer in his early 40s and only made five pictures (both Godfathers, Dog Day Afternoon, The Conversation and The Deer Hunter). Every one of those pictures was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture and three of them won. His girlfriend, who stayed with him until he died, was Meryl Streep.
    For other classic films I still recommend Casablanca, which is usually included in Top Ten of all time movies like the Godfather and Airplane! for its quick paced jokes.

  • @menace2society456
    @menace2society456 2 роки тому +15

    The Godfather is as much about family as it is organised crime, in The Godfather it was the fall of Vito(his death) and the rise of Michael. The Godfather 2 is the rise of Vito and a kind of fall of Michael. Michael lost his Mother, his Wife, his Son(abortion) and Fredo.

  • @jflaugher
    @jflaugher 2 роки тому +5

    It was Hyman Roth who gave the order to kill Frank Pentangeli, though he had set up the scene so cleverly, making it look like Michael gave the order. Roth wanted to break Michael's bond with his closest most trustworthy allies.

  • @slchance8839
    @slchance8839 2 роки тому +3

    i love how you guys have so much respect for each other. you listen. you mill over what you've heard and then process.
    it's good conversation.
    i bet you'd be great dinner companions.

  • @dudermcdudeface3674
    @dudermcdudeface3674 2 роки тому +14

    Godfather 2 is one of those rare sequels that's so good, it turns the original into a prequel after the fact. It's "The" Godfather, and "The Godfather" is like Godfather 0.5.

    • @juniegyllenhaal3937
      @juniegyllenhaal3937 2 роки тому

      But it’s not better

    • @kurtrivero368
      @kurtrivero368 2 роки тому

      @@juniegyllenhaal3937 It is equal.

    • @citypopFM
      @citypopFM 2 роки тому

      As much as I love Brando, Godfather 2 is a slightly better film IMO. It's more complex yet pulls it off beautifully, everyone is on point acting wise, the storylines are brilliant, and it expands upon everything great about the first. I mean I love Terminator 1 but T2 is a better flick IMO too.

    • @brandonfranzen5191
      @brandonfranzen5191 2 роки тому

      The first is more enjoyable but the second is just superior

  • @marclevesque3147
    @marclevesque3147 2 роки тому +2

    I think Michael in the story, was transformed by the death of his first wife, it killed much of his humanity and innocence, coming back from that, he appears much colder and ruthless. or was he always like that, the last scene showing him sitting alone at the family table in his youth failing to connect or relate to the others, is a sign of him being an outsider, bad circumstances later formed him into what he ultimately became...

    • @crowfeedreactions
      @crowfeedreactions Рік тому

      He wasn't an outsider. His father PURPOSELY kept him apart, sending him to college when the other sons didn't go, keeping him out of the family business when the others were involved in it. It was Vito who had plans for Michael, not Michael's nature that caused him to be one step outside the family. He clearly loved his family though, enough that he would do anything, ANYTHING, so that they survived.

  • @Ian-lx1iz
    @Ian-lx1iz 2 роки тому +2

    Great reaction video, guys!
    It's very engrossing to watch along with you.
    (So much so - you've made me late!!)

  • @phj223
    @phj223 2 роки тому +8

    I've always regretted that Vito doesn't accept the groceries from the store owner who had to let him go, it's just heartbreaking to see him standing there with the basket still in his arms. ;( But it makes sense both cinematically as it makes you remember the scene, and it also shows the character and personality of Vito, as his pride won't let him accept a pity gift.

    • @Hexon66
      @Hexon66 2 роки тому +1

      A person who cannot accept charity, cannot be charitable. They will always look down on those who accept help. He would have considered it an obligation to be paid back, just like his policy as Don.

  • @dragonoftheeast7572
    @dragonoftheeast7572 2 роки тому +3

    It's amazing how you guys totally understood BOTH Godfathers really quickly... Most people don't get it that fast👍

  • @lino9222
    @lino9222 Рік тому +1

    I love your reactions I am 70 now and retired You two help keep me company thank you from Canada

  • @e.jamesshepard7183
    @e.jamesshepard7183 2 роки тому +1

    He told Frankie that Michael Corleone says hello to make him think Michael was the one behind his murder instead of Hyman Roth. And since frankie didnt die, that's why he's was going to testify against Michael.

  • @keithcaserta
    @keithcaserta 2 роки тому +4

    This is, IMO, the greatest movie of all time. I am of half-Sicilian descent (my grandfather and grandmother - separately - immigrated to the U S from Sicily). I have visited my cousins near Messina. The scenery, family episodes and ambiance ring true even today. Though my family had only a filament of connection to the mafia (my great uncle was a lawyer ...) I understand the deep family connections. For most of your viewers like me, I believe our resemblance to these people center around family. That is the Italian (in general), and Sicilian (in particular), contribution to the structure of society in the USA. If you experience the Italian/Sicilian warmth, you will understand.

  • @axelbaker8737
    @axelbaker8737 2 роки тому +3

    Okay, I have to point this out because it’s so subtle that everyone misses it: when Tom had that convo with Frank at the prison about the Roman Empire and how if you failed to assassinate the Emperor, you’d be given a chance to commit suicide to preserve your fortune, that was code. They were essentially saying that if Frank commits suicide, the Corleones won’t retaliate and go after his family.
    And the really subtle part is that when the convo was done and Tom shook Franks hand, Frank closed up his hand and put something in his pocket. Presumably that something was a razor blade that he later used to kill himself.
    Edit: just finished the vid and it looks like the figures out the meaning of the convo. Think the missed the “putting something in their pocket” part.

    • @Hexon66
      @Hexon66 2 роки тому

      I don't think many miss it. It's actually kind of a little too on the nose.

  • @da1calledj54
    @da1calledj54 2 роки тому +1

    U got that wrong sir. He loved his family. He just was not interested in being a criminal, but when his family was attacked he stepped up and saved the fam.

  • @gottfrieddon618
    @gottfrieddon618 2 роки тому +2

    I'm glad you guys are enjoying The Godfather Trilogy. It's always captivating to see the reactions of the people who watch the series for the first time. The Godfather is the essence of so many knowledge, and I personally apply some of them in daily life and business, not in criminal way, of course. Honor, Loyalty, Perseverance, Vigilance ..

  • @chefskiss6179
    @chefskiss6179 2 роки тому +26

    "The rent... stays... like before."
    Goosebumps. Every time.
    Loved this reaction vid by you both, especially the pausing to chit-chat. I hope you finish off the trilogy. To be fair, it is hard for an artist to replicate lightning in a bottle, but for story sake, I love the third instalment.
    I hope you finish it off with 1990's The Freshman, with Brando and Bruno Kirby in a cute is he/isn't he the godfather meta caper.

    • @citypopFM
      @citypopFM 2 роки тому +3

      I'm not a fan of Godfather 3, it's okay but not great, but the new director's cut was at least better. I hope they watch that version than the theatrical one.

  • @timfoley332
    @timfoley332 2 роки тому +18

    Remember Vito didn't want this life for Michael. And Michael goes to his mother and asks can a man lose his family. She says no. He says but times are changing. He loses his family even though he got into the business to protect it. Truly a tragic figure

  • @Donald_ekpe
    @Donald_ekpe 5 місяців тому

    Man, your analysis and observations on this was really profound. You understood it so well.

  • @rasalghul1263
    @rasalghul1263 2 роки тому +1

    I am so glad I clicked and decided to give this reaction a chance.. you guys are awesome

  • @Filimaua13
    @Filimaua13 2 роки тому +8

    Awesome reaction guys!
    I really do like how Godfather 2 is more complex than the original. Goes from a family drama of a father passing on the mantle to his son, to the story of the corruption of the American Dream.
    From the humble beginnings and rise of Vito to the slow decay and destruction of Michael. Showing the roots of how close knit and family orientated Vito was to the more distant and corporate minded Michael was despite how much he tried to be like his father. Its just as Michael said when he was talking to his mother "times are changing." The people who immigrated to America simply for a better life have descended into people of greed. I highly doubt family orientated people like Vito would have travelled to Cuba and sat through those boring meetings with strangers.
    Its natural that the story ends here hence why we never got another film after this for such a long time. Cos it was meant to be the end. What else is there to tell? Michael is doomed to go down a path of isolation as he always was an outsider. And we completed the backstory of how Vito became The Godfather. The story is complete. The ultimate epic tragedy, of the rise and fall of the Corleone Family.

  • @raec6349
    @raec6349 2 роки тому +7

    I really enjoyed your reactions for both of the Godfathers, you both followed the characters and the plot amazingly well! This movie series is one of my favorites of all time. React to the third!

  • @jaredb0308
    @jaredb0308 2 роки тому +1

    I love the fact how they show Don Vito Corleone story and the difference between him and Michael and how Michael life took a turn for the worse

  • @nelson6553
    @nelson6553 2 роки тому +2

    Its a complex story but you guys did a good job getting through it and figuring the story out- Good Job
    I really enjoyed your reaction and how you two contributed with each other - Great!!!!

  • @lastsigil7241
    @lastsigil7241 2 роки тому +1

    You guys have such good observational skills man. I will definitely watch more of your reactions ba.

  • @theodocious.magnifico
    @theodocious.magnifico 2 роки тому +2

    47:55 🤣 Best observation ever!

  • @Buugzy
    @Buugzy 2 роки тому +4

    In case you didn’t know, the bar scene where they try to kill Frank is an actual event! Carmine Persico tried to strangle Joe Gallos brother the same way

  • @illasbonez1708
    @illasbonez1708 2 роки тому +1

    When Marian said "Coz that's how he is." That's exactly it, Michael and his father faught this part of him his whole life. But in the end that is exactly how he is, down to his core.

  • @LiloFunk68
    @LiloFunk68 2 роки тому +4

    Great reaction. The bar scene with the attempted Pentangeli murder was based on a real life attempted murder of one of the Gallo Brothers, New York based mobsters from what was then known as the Profaci Family. The "Michael Corleone says hello!" line was improvised by the actor Danny Aiello. Coppola liked the line so left it in. It's important to remember that at THAT particular point in time Michael did NOT want Pentangeli dead. This would later change, obviously.
    As to why the character would say that there are at least two possibilities imo. (1) Hyman Roth lies to the Rosato Brothers and tells them that they have Michael's permission and (2) the character just likes mocking the victims he kills-similar to a murderer telling a religious person "Where is your God now?" as he kills him/her.

  • @suprchickn7745
    @suprchickn7745 2 роки тому +1

    Robert Duvall (Tom Haven) has been in some of the most amazing movies ever made going back to "To Kill A Mockingbird". Such a solid, natural actor.

  • @Red-Brick-Dream
    @Red-Brick-Dream 2 роки тому +1

    "IN MY HOME!!! IN MY BEDROOM, WHERE MY WIFE SLEEPS???"
    I think that outburst was mainly to test Frankie's reaction and read his face. If he really thought Pentangelli did it, he wouldn't have come personally, let alone without his men. It was that moment that he decided it must have been Roth. Frankie was a loyal soldier; not stupid, but not a schemer either. It wasn't his style.

  • @ivyfalls1
    @ivyfalls1 2 роки тому +2

    I really like your reactions. You two really get into the movie and make intelligent observations. So refreshing compared to most people that watch movies and make faces as if that is an intelligent reaction.

  • @jessied8585
    @jessied8585 2 роки тому +2

    The slap. I'm a 55 yr old woman and Michael Corleone had EVERY right to slap the crap out of Kay. She married into the family. She knew what she was getting into. She should have said I'll wait for you till you get straight in business, then marry him. Remember Italian Mafia, especially in those days were STRONG CATHOLICS and that's a big no no. She did it also to hurt him, she knew what she was doing. Knowing Michael, she's damn lucky slap her is all he did.

  • @arjaylee
    @arjaylee Рік тому +2

    Apolonia's death was the main tragedy of the story

  • @perrymalcolm3802
    @perrymalcolm3802 2 роки тому +2

    Beardy has exactly the right take on Vito and his real relationships with common people with real problems vs the others leaders n his kids.

  • @queegs73
    @queegs73 2 роки тому +14

    I’m enjoying watching you both react to The Godfather trilogy. You guys pause it to debate, make points, and guess what’s going to happen. Yes, we see Michael go down a dark path.
    In GF3 you will see how all those dark deeds have affected Michael after all the years in between GF2 and GF3. The third film seems to be gaining acceptance since it’s release. It was criticized by critics. But honestly, they could not realistically live up to the high bar set by the first two films. But GF3 does a fine job of wrapping up the Corleone saga. In GF3 there are some good lines and a very somber “confession scene” that leaves the viewer sad for Michael.
    Looking forward to the next video.

    • @marcuscato9083
      @marcuscato9083 2 роки тому +2

      It doesn’t live up to the first two movies, but people really exaggerate about how bad it is. It’s true that poor Sofia Coppola was not a professional caliber actress, but there are still plenty of good moments in it.

    • @MrAitraining
      @MrAitraining 2 роки тому

      @@marcuscato9083 my mIn problem was al pacino himself. He seemed to forget who he was playing. I get the redemption aspect and all that, but his Michael corleone was almost unrecognizable. I thought the church plot was very good and Joe mantegna was great but little else for me.

  • @damonmcfarland9364
    @damonmcfarland9364 2 роки тому +1

    of all the people I have seen react to the trilogy, you two have nailed it! I mean this. every scene every character. that is why i have subbed.

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +1

      🥰 thank you so much! The film was a masterpiece and it would be a shame to not get hooked on it. We almost named our cat "Michael Corleone" 🤣

    • @damonmcfarland9364
      @damonmcfarland9364 2 роки тому +1

      @@MJoy4Fun HAHAHA!!! must be quiet and unasumming before the cat POUCES!!! "Cat, do you renounce kitty litter?" (capo regime cats attacking one of the neighborhood cats) "I renounce kitty litter."

  • @Psergiorivera
    @Psergiorivera Рік тому +1

    Marion was right on about how this movie is all about the subtle way Vito leads with logic, and Michael leads with anger, power, frustration. For me, the best part was the scene where Vito tracks the Evil Don on top of the roofs, that was STUNNING.

  • @danielfardella1622
    @danielfardella1622 2 роки тому

    My father had Vito's personality and we are Sicilian. He always told us not to be impressed with La Cosa Nostra or Mafia and to never participate run that life, but go to school and become a good person. I miss him and moma very much, and now I am an old man. I saw these movies when they first came out and knew some of the actors in real life. I think it was a masterpiece, and the director Francis Coppola is of course Sicilian so he knew how to interpret Mario Puzo's book "The Godfather". I remember family acting just like the movie and today there is no one, but in my life I was happy that I chose to help people instead of hurt them. It is better to have God and friends than to have money and power.

  • @Al_NERi
    @Al_NERi Рік тому

    Sharp eyed viewers might notice some interesting cameo appearances in small roles: one of the FBI agents guarding Frank Pantagales is Harry Dean Stanton who would go on to play one of the doomed spacefarers in Ridley Scott's Alien and later still he starred as the treacherous Brain in John Carpenter's Escape From New York. Also, one of the Senator panelists in the Anti organized crime Senate hearings is the legendary King of indie film production Roger Corman, who gave Francis Ford Coppola his earliest breaks in the movie business- Coppola put him in the film as a personal honor/tribute. Other Corman alumni are known for putting him in small roles as a gesture of thanks- Joe Dante used him in The Howling (1980) and Jonathan Demme gave him a cameo part in Silence Of The Lambs. Roger Corman jump started the careers of many filmmakers and actors and remains a respected and beloved figure, both in Tinseltown and fandom circles. Many of the directors he helped and mentored are glad to pay him tribute with screen time in their own films.

  • @michaeladams7102
    @michaeladams7102 2 роки тому +5

    Another older classic you should check out is "The Outsiders", it has one of the best casts ever assembled.

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +1

      thank you for suggestion! will check it out

  • @jbo4547
    @jbo4547 2 роки тому +1

    You all are fantasticm i love your discussions throughout the reaction. You come from a different point of of view and its cool to see/hear your thoughts

  • @ryangilligan40
    @ryangilligan40 2 роки тому +1

    English is obviously your second language, but you guys put together a better examination of this film than most people whose English is their first language.
    👋

  • @kyleshockley1573
    @kyleshockley1573 2 роки тому +4

    Mario Puzo's version of Michael and his two brothers comes across as slightly different versions of eachother and their father. Michael sounds and acts more like Sonny, mostly in lines and actions that were cut from the book for the first film. I think both Coppola and Pacino brought a certain coldness and calmness to Michael's character that really brings the story and theme to another level.
    Kay's character and family are described as Protestant, professional, detached civic mindset, typical American. Not as involved with their children. She has a hard time understanding Michael's closer family dynamics and is pretty oblivious to the crime world undertones. Hence her line about how senators and presidents don't have people killed, because that's just not how (she thinks) things are done here. She really doesn't understand the family in the book, especially Michael's parents, though she tries to for his sake.
    I think Mister's observation about how governments operate like mafias is accurate. Or, mafias as start-up or aspiring governments and empires.
    It sort of plays into how as Americanized Michael becomes more powerful, he sort of reverts back to that part of Kay's character that they both shared being raised in America, as younger ideal persons, "professional," detached. The American cultural characteristic of independence that, to the world his family is from, makes him an outsider. He has his time in Sicily, but when he's in America is when he crosses that line and becomes ruthless. Same as his father. The effect from each place has its own characteristic way of delivering both softness and brutality: In Sicily it's more humble, familial, and extreme and tragic, but limited; in America it's more comfortable, professional, and total war with unlimited potential once unlocked. And no room to feel as much.
    Maybe Michael not having to live the brutality of the Sicilian experience as a child made him more a product of comfortable America and WWII. He just doesn't know when the war is over or to sue for peace. He'd never lost it all and had to flee like his father did, when his enemies didn't know when to stop. He never experienced tragedy until after he'd crossed that line into total war against his enemies even if he felt he was pushed into it, whether by the 5 Families or the Axis Powers. Again, the tragedy is personal in the Old World; it's more clinical and monumental in America. And it always comes from people not knowing when enough was enough.

  • @naimaismail4356
    @naimaismail4356 2 роки тому +12

    Michael's transformation from war hero, to ruthless Don makes him one of the most interesting characters in film. Still do not agree with him killing Fredo, that was too far.

    • @Hexon66
      @Hexon66 2 роки тому

      Or, it should make one question what constitutes a war hero, and what you have to do become one. Is it different if your side wins?

    • @naimaismail4356
      @naimaismail4356 2 роки тому

      @@Hexon66 interesting Question, I guess a war hero depends on what side you’re looking at history from.

  • @clarencewalker3925
    @clarencewalker3925 2 роки тому +1

    In addendum: These two should have their own tv show. Really!

  • @lehampton1
    @lehampton1 2 роки тому

    When the Rosato brothers tried to kill Pentangeli in the bar, the bartender yells “Carmine no! Not in here!”
    This is a reference to the actual event in the Colombo/Gallo war when Carmine Persico Jr changes loyalty away from the Gallos and over to the Colombo faction. He sets up a meeting with Larry Gallo in a bar and tries to garrote him but a beat cop walks in and Persico and his accomplices flee leaving Larry Gallo still alive but just barely.
    The bartender’s line is a nod to the real Carmine Persico Jr, by then head of the borgata after Joe Colombo was shot and left in a coma.

  • @giannag4581
    @giannag4581 2 роки тому +1

    As always I love your reactions. And you also show what we hope to see in the movies. ❤️

  • @Lakeshore14
    @Lakeshore14 2 роки тому

    I love your reactions to the Godfather movies. Everyone I know has watched these movies multiple times. Each time you watch it you see something that you didn’t see before. These movies are classic and have won many awards. They are always topics of discussion.

  • @pliny8308
    @pliny8308 2 роки тому +12

    Vito wanted the heads of the five families to be killed; he just knew he didn't have the power at that time. He left it to Michael. Kay was the wrong wife for Michael. Appollonia was the right wife for Michael. She would have been like his mother; she would have kept the family together, and maybe she would have softened him a bit, at least towards his own family.

    • @yes2day100
      @yes2day100 2 роки тому +1

      I prefer to think that Michael was the wrong husband for Kay. He lied to her, she believed him, and as she realized that he lied to her in the worst possible ways, the scales fell piece by piece from her eyes. He destroyed her life. Took her children away.

    • @gmunden1
      @gmunden1 2 роки тому

      Appolonia would have been the perect dutiful Sicilian wife. She would never involve herself in the family "business" by constantly questioning Michael. Kay was an outsider, a woman with a career, and opinion which is not a good fit for Michael, especially for that time in the 1940's. Kay was also in denial and thought Michael would "change". Her big mistake (aside from marrying into this family) was her defiance and vindictive comments about having an abortion. How did she think that he would let her walk off with their children? She should never have thrown that in his face. She should have said nothing and let him believe it was a miscarriage. It's still bad but at least she could have walked away without being shut out from visiting her children.

    • @yes2day100
      @yes2day100 2 роки тому +1

      @@gmunden1 SO, let me get this straight. Michael can lie repeatedly to her, and Michael can kill dozens of people including his own brother and his brother-in-law, and Michael can slap her, and deny her her children. But Kay is the bad one because she told him to his face what a cruel so and so he was, and that she didn't want to perpetuate that crime family? I agree that Appollonia would have been a meeker, more malleable, less challenging choice, and she would have just gone along with all the killing because she would never have allowed herself to look up from her kitchen stove. I'm sure Michael would have been happier. Kay certainly would have been happier. Maybe not Appollonia. But as between the two - Michael and Kay - in a marriage, Kay is the one who got shafted and somehow some people blame her for the fact that she finally stood up to her sociopath of a husband. BTW, I love the movie, and find Michael's arc one of the most fascinating in all filmdom, but if one doesn't come away from the Godfather movies knowing that Michael is a sociopath, then one has lost the plot.

    • @nindingu6349
      @nindingu6349 2 роки тому +1

      @@yes2day100 To be fair though, Kay kind of knew what she was going into when she decided to even get with Michael, but yeah, I do think she is in the right for standing up.

    • @zoluhwa3508
      @zoluhwa3508 2 роки тому

      Yes, Apollina was the right wife for Micheal. She would have been like Micheals mother, what i love about godfather 2 is that they showed Vito's life with his wife, when vito and clemenza brought the stolen rug the wife didn't ask how he got the rug knowing he got laid off and can't afford it (a person similar to Kay would probably never want a stolen thing in her home) and then micheal, clemenz and tessio were discussing criminal activities while eating spaghetti near the wife not hiding anything from her. Then later Vito's wife told him to help the old lady with the dog being evicted from her home, this show that people were also approaching the wife for favors....Apollina would have been like this, when she first saw micheal there was two armed man with him at all time, she's Sicilian and understand that mafioso culture. Michael wouldn't have to hide anything from her and lie to her. Kay on the other hand, micheal had to lie to her too keep her happy because she would never understand the "family business". And most importantly Apollina would never had an abortion to prevent future micheals from existing.

  • @natea2247
    @natea2247 2 роки тому +27

    When you watch Godfather 3, watch the new director's cut the released last year called Godfather Coda. That version is the director's vision. It is better than the theatrical cut and is pretty decent. Godfather Coda is more of an epilogue of the story. It might not be quite as good as 1 and 2 but it's worth watching especially to see the conclusion of these characters we've grown to know from the first two. Full title is called "Godfather Coda Death of Michael Corleone"

    • @chilenozo
      @chilenozo 2 роки тому

      I much prefer the old ending thou

  • @clee3133
    @clee3133 2 роки тому

    It's not that Michael doesn't love family, he does. He just doesn't want anyone, even his father, to dictate his life to him.

  • @johnscott4196
    @johnscott4196 2 роки тому

    I've watched lots of other reactors but I really like the way you guys frame the pics and the video. I like the way you think and discuss points but also let it flow. Smart couple.

  • @rxtsec1
    @rxtsec1 2 роки тому +4

    Marlon Brando (Best Actor) & Robert De Niro (Best Supporting actor) were the first actors to win a oscar for the same part. It's only happened one other time with Joker with Heath Ledger & Joaquin Phoenix. Al Pacino not winning best actor for this movie is considered the biggest snub in oscar history however he did it to himself. For part 1 he was nominated for best Supporting actor but boycotted the Oscars cause he felt he should have been nominated for Best actor

    • @imnotsuperstitiousbutiamal4186
      @imnotsuperstitiousbutiamal4186 2 роки тому

      Seriously, wow. He should of been lead actor and Brando supporting but it didn't happen that way, Brando had something like 15-20 mins. of screen time but can you do?

    • @rxtsec1
      @rxtsec1 2 роки тому

      @@imnotsuperstitiousbutiamal4186 Oscars doesn't do it that way, never had

    • @rxtsec1
      @rxtsec1 2 роки тому

      @@imnotsuperstitiousbutiamal4186 also as much as I loved Al in this one Brandon was slightly better for me personally

  • @jeanb.5405
    @jeanb.5405 Рік тому +1

    Michael plays Roth and Frank simultaneously but it was Roth who had tried to kill MIchael and then who ultimately tries to kill Frank and tells his guys the Rosato brothers, to say that it was a gift from Michael so when Michael goes on trial, Frank is going to witness against him because he thinks Michael tried to kill him..... Then when he realizes his crime boss brother from Italy is in town he is scared because they are not going to forgive him if he turns on the family. Then Tom goes to see Frank in prison to let him know that Michael will care for his family if he goes ahead and kills himself.

  • @Jasoux
    @Jasoux 10 місяців тому

    Marian and Joy.. you expose such relationship dynamics during the reaction video... it adds to the understanding and re-loving ths great movie
    The second Godfather film
    You're doing well

  • @MrRondonmon
    @MrRondonmon 2 роки тому +3

    I think you missed the overall point. Mike didn't want to be a part of the Mob, but once he got dragged in, it created a BEAST that he never wanted to be, the inertia of fear that he would be killed made him kill everyone else, he thought he had to kill them before they killed him. So the movie was designed to show how once you join the mob, your life will never be the same, you can be a gentle soul, and then become an evil soul. Don't kid yourself, his dad was evil also, it just wasn't emphasized, they kill people all the time, and threaten to kill if you do not pay them for protection. The mob are scum, evil people.

    • @Hexon66
      @Hexon66 2 роки тому

      I'm not sure I agree that Michael never wanted to be part of the family business. He certainly stated that at the start, but I feel that was the result of his experiences in the war. It would be like a mirror image of Rick Blaine in Casablanca, who had become cynical, against his nature, refused to help anyone. Rick would be considered an anti-hero, who finally can no longer resist his heroic nature, after suppressing it so long. Michael knows he is a villain, destined to be a villain, but wants to (perhaps halfheartedly) resist it. After all, while there is an attempt on his father's life was jolting, wouldn't that be a time for him to have a heart-to-heart with Vito, to reconsider the life of the family? Of course, but he isn't really that person, he is a villain. Perhaps to extend the metaphor, an anti-villain, who just can't resist his nature.

  • @bickrean5122
    @bickrean5122 2 роки тому +2

    I’ve watched I and II over hundred times each and never tied Vito’s “a man who doesn’t spend time with his family can never be a real man” quote and how Michael became. Kay and the kids being held like prisoners while Michael was out on “business”. Michael having no clue how his family actually was. Thanks for that observation.

  • @mrtomas0990
    @mrtomas0990 2 роки тому +1

    Michael was Vito's favourite son, but you right Michael never beleived in family values as much. Great points

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +1

      yeeea! he got blinded on how to act against enemies, or how to find the next snitch.. he never trusted anyone. His Father gain Respect and trust, things that he couldn't have... instead he got. Feared and Despised

  • @Kenny-ep2nf
    @Kenny-ep2nf Рік тому

    Michael was often misunderstood by other characters but deep down he had noble intentions.

  • @CaesiusX
    @CaesiusX 2 роки тому +2

    It's a fictional story. The *Corleones* are not real people. As I understand it, *Michael's* character, and even his father's, are both composites of different mobsters of known repute. _Terrific reaction, as always!_ 🙋🏼‍♂️

    • @Blandina11
      @Blandina11 2 роки тому +2

      Michael Corleone is loosely based on Joseph Bonanno and Vito Genovese. Bonanno became a boss of his own family at a very young age and he relocated some of his businesses to Arizona in the 1960s. Genovese had fled to Sicily in the 1930s due to murder charges and ordered the deaths of rival bosses in the 1950s.

    • @CaesiusX
      @CaesiusX 2 роки тому +1

      @@Blandina11 Thank you for taking the time to include that. While I was aware of this, I didn't feel that particular level of detail was worth putting in a UA-cam comment. Not with over 500 hours of video uploaded to UA-cam _every minute,_ and viewers watching over one billion hours of videos every single day. I feel it can be a waste of time¹ to include certain details in comments, especially here on UA-cam. . . The vast majority of which are generally quickly forgotten.²
      If you haven't already, perhaps you should post this as its own comment proper. Having that much detail in a _comment reply_ may not get the attention your effort deserves. 🤷🏼‍♂️
      Be well.🙋🏼‍♂️
      ··•✺•··
      ¹ ─ Primarily, but not exclusively, _my time._
      ² ─ Even more so when it comes to specific names likely never to be referenced again.

  • @lucideena9
    @lucideena9 2 роки тому

    You guys are a lot of fun. I'm in my seventies, and I remember seeing these movies when I was about your age. Watching the movie with people new to the movie is great.

  • @axelbaker8737
    @axelbaker8737 2 роки тому +1

    Hyman Roth has to be one of the best movie character names of all time.

  • @Wyrmwould
    @Wyrmwould 2 роки тому +3

    I envy the fact that you guys were able to enjoy these movies for the first time. I've seen all three more times than I can count. Like many people, I was disappointed in The Godfather Part 3, but I do strongly recommend that if you continue the series you watch the version known as Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone. That is the version that the director of the Godfather Trilogy (Francis Ford Coppola) prefers.

  • @fcruz43215
    @fcruz43215 2 роки тому +1

    You are both so entertaining. I enjoyed watching parts 1 and 2.

  • @danielrglass
    @danielrglass 2 роки тому

    Nice react guys! Your conversation and assumptions were the best, lol; keep going with more movies' reacts, cheers from Brazil \o/

  • @dvdknight1
    @dvdknight1 2 роки тому +1

    Great reactions to a great movie! You both are great together! Glad I found your channel!

    • @MJoy4Fun
      @MJoy4Fun  2 роки тому +2

      Thank you enjoyed it! We fell inlove with this film!

  • @samanthanickson6478
    @samanthanickson6478 2 роки тому +1

    vito was a better husband and father, being a don came second. michael was a better don, but put his family second. he didn’t see his father put in the hard work to keep everything together in the beginning, he expected that family would just fall in line with his demands, but hypocritically can’t remember his resistance to all of his fathers requests / all things bringing the family together. it was very important for him to be contrary to his father when he was younger; but somehow thought his being head of family would be easy street.

  • @jamesdean4317
    @jamesdean4317 2 роки тому

    I'm a Godfather fan but I never realised the thing you said at the end of the movie. That Michael never liked having family. And that made so much sense.