This game is an attempt to play a Romantic Era chess opening to perfection. Stockfish 17 calculated for over 8 hours in total for this game. In critical positions, the depth reached more than 70 moves. If a move is labeled as inaccurate, the Chess.com analysis is likely not strong enough to understand it. Check the description for more info :). This video took a long time to make so subscribe if you wanr to support my channel ^^
When I got into chess engines I was surprised how they can make even the craziest gambits work (This is a dubious version of the dubious Kings Gambit btw lmao). I really appreciate the comment :))
@@ahurax3710 The chesscom analysis is only calling one move brilliant. That move was a sac of a knight so its correct. Single exclemation mark means only move meaning its the only move to not lose a significant amount of evaluation. No basic move was called brilliant but i understand the confusion. Also of course the analysis likes the moves as this game was played by Stockfish 17 on very high depth so the play is of way higher quality then that of even the best human players.
This game is an attempt to play a Romantic Era chess opening to perfection. Stockfish 17 calculated for over 8 hours in total for this game. In critical positions, the depth reached more than 70 moves. If a move is labeled as inaccurate, the Chess.com analysis is likely not strong enough to understand it. Check the description for more info :).
This video took a long time to make so subscribe if you wanr to support my channel ^^
Its kinda rare to see engines use Kings gambit, when GMs themselves don't use Kings gambit because of the risk associated with it. Nice work.
When I got into chess engines I was surprised how they can make even the craziest gambits work (This is a dubious version of the dubious Kings Gambit btw lmao). I really appreciate the comment :))
黒い現実主義と白いロマン主義が伯仲していて美しい。
退廃的なBGMも気に入りました。
（訳：以下は翻訳されたものです）
コメントありがとうございます！それは私にとって大きなモチベーションです。
1:56 the rook promotion 😂💀💀💀💀
at like depth 40 Stockfish suddenly decided promoting to a rook is better i swear lmao
Song name?
j^p^n - wrong
i play Nf3 in the kings gambit its weird seeing a bot play Nc3
This was a pre arranged opening to make it more interesting :). Playing Nc3 is very dubious.
I don't understand 😂
wait what do u mean 😭
Brilliant move at every move thats false
I don't understand what you are trying to say but ty for the comment it helps alot 🤝
@@Julius-chess im saying that its literally briliant for every basic move
@@ahurax3710 The chesscom analysis is only calling one move brilliant. That move was a sac of a knight so its correct. Single exclemation mark means only move meaning its the only move to not lose a significant amount of evaluation. No basic move was called brilliant but i understand the confusion.
Also of course the analysis likes the moves as this game was played by Stockfish 17 on very high depth so the play is of way higher quality then that of even the best human players.